Day 13, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 13, 2024 by MaryO

UVA 2004
Cushing’s Conventions have always been special times for me – we learn a lot, get to meet other Cushies, even get referrals to endos!

As early as 2001 (or before) my pituitary function was dropping.  My former endo tested annually but did nothing to help me with the symptoms.

In the fall of 2002 my endo refused to discuss my fatigue or anything at all with me until I lost 10 pounds. He said I wasn’t worth treating in my overweight condition and that I was setting myself up for a heart attack. He gave me 3 months to lose this weight. Those 3 months included Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years.  Needless to say, I left his office in tears, again.

Fast forward 2 years to 2004.  I had tried for a while to get my records from this endo. He wouldn’t send them, even at doctors’ or my requests.

I wanted to go see Dr. Vance at UVa but I had no records so she wouldn’t see me until I could get them.

Finally, my husband went to the former endo’s office and threatened him with a court order. The office manager managed to come up with about 13 pages of records. For going to him from 1986 to 2001 including weeks and weeks at NIH and pituitary surgery, that didn’t seem like enough records to me.

In April of 2004, many of us from the message boards went to the UVa Pituitary Days Convention. That’s where the picture above comes in.  Other pictures from that convention are here.

By chance, we met a wonderful woman named Barbara Craven. She sat at our table for lunch on the last day and, after we learned that she was a dietitian who had had Cushing’s, one of us jokingly asked her if she’d do a guest chat for us. I didn’t follow through on this until she emailed me later. In the email, she asked how I was doing. Usually I say “fine” or “ok” but for some reason, I told her exactly how awful I was feeling.

Barbara emailed me back and said I should see a doctor at Johns Hopkins. I said I didn’t think I could get a recommendation to there, so SHE referred me. The doctor got right back to me, set up an appointment. Between his vacation and mine, that first appointment turned out to be Tuesday, Sept 14, 2004.

Just getting through the maze at Johns Hopkins was amazing. They have the whole system down to a science, moving from one place to another to sign in, then go here, then window 6, then… But it was very efficient.

My new doctor was wonderful. Understanding, knowledgeable. He never once said that I was “too fat” or “depressed” or that all this was my own fault. I feel so validated, finally.

He looked through my records, especially at my 2 previous Insulin Tolerance Tests (ITT). From those, he determined that my growth hormone has been low since at least August 2001 and I’ve been adrenal insufficient since at least Fall, 1999 – possibly as much as 17 years! I was amazed to hear all this, and astounded that my former endo not only didn’t tell me any of this, he did nothing. He had known both of these things – they were in the past records that I took with me. Perhaps that was why he had been so reluctant to share copies of those records. He had given me Cortef in the fall of 1999 to take just in case I had “stress” and that was it.

The new endo took a lot of blood (no urine!) for cortisol and thyroid stuff. I went back on Sept. 28, 2004 for arginine, cortrosyn and IGF testing.

He said that I would end up on daily cortisone – a “sprinkling” – and some form of GH, based on the testing the 28th.

For those who are interested, my new endo is Roberto Salvatori, M.D.
Assistant Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins

Medical School: Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
Residency: Montefiore Medical Center
Fellowship: Cornell University, Johns Hopkins University
Board Certification: Endocrinology and Metabolism, Internal Medicine

Clinical Interests: Neuroendocrinology, pituitary disorders, adrenal disorders

Research Interests: Control of growth hormone secretion, genetic causes of growth hormone deficiency, consequences of growth hormone deficiency.

Although I have this wonderful doctor, a specialist in growth hormone deficiency at Johns Hopkins, in November, 2004, my insurance company saw fit to over-ride his opinions and his test results based on my past pharmaceutical history! Hello??? How could I have a history of taking GH when I’ve never taken it before?

Of course, I found out late on a Friday afternoon. By then it was too late to call my case worker at the drug company, so we had to appeal on Monday. My local insurance person also worked on an appeal, but the whole thing was  just another long ordeal of finding paperwork, calling people, FedExing stuff, too much work when I just wanted to start feeling better by Thanksgiving.

As it turned out the insurance company rejected the brand of hGH that was prescribed for me. They gave me the ok for a growth hormone was just FDA-approved for adults on 11/4/04. The day this medication was approved for adults was the day after my insurance said that’s what is preferred for me. In the past, this form of hGH was only approved for children with height issues. Was I going to be a ginuea pig again?

The new GH company assigned a rep for me, submitted info to pharmacy, and waited for insurance approval, again.

I finally started the Growth Hormone December 7, 2004.

Was the hassle and 3 year wait worth it?

Stay tuned for April 15, 2016 when all will be revealed.

Read

Read Dr. Barbara Craven’s Guest Chat, October 27, 2004

Thanks for reading 🙂

MaryO

Filed under: adrenal crisis, Cushing's, Meetings and Conferences, pituitary, symptoms, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

Day 12, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 12, 2024 by MaryO

In March of 1987, after the endo finally  confirmed that I had Cushing’s, I was sent to a local hospital where they repeated all those same tests for another week and decided that it was not my adrenal gland (Cushing’s Syndrome) creating the problem. The doctors and nurses had no idea what to do with me, so they put me on the brain cancer ward.

When I left this hospital after a week, we didn’t know any more than we had before.

As luck would have it, NIH (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) was doing a clinical trial of Cushing’s. I live in the same area as NIH so it was not too inconvenient but very scary at first to think of being tested there. At that time I only had a choice of NIH, Mayo Clinic and a place in Quebec to do this then-rare pituitary surgery called a Transsphenoidal Resection.

My husband asked my endo if it were his wife, if he would recommend this surgery.  The endo responded that he was divorcing his wife – he didn’t care what happened to her.  Oh, my!

I chose NIH – closest and free. After I was interviewed by the doctors there, I got a letter that I had been accepted into the clinical trial.

The night before I was admitted, I signed my will.  I was sure I was going to die there.  If not during testing, as a result of surgery.

The first time I was there was for 6 weeks as an inpatient. More of the same tests.

There were about 12 of us there and it was nice not to be alone with this mystery disease. Many of these Cushies (mostly women) were getting bald, couldn’t walk, having strokes, had diabetes. One was blind, one had a heart attack while I was there. Several were from Greece.

My first roommate was a nurse.  She spent the entire first night screaming in pain.  I was very glad when they moved me to a new room!

Towards the end of my testing period, I was looking forward to the surgery just to get this whole mess over with – either a cure or dying. While I was at NIH, I was gaining about a pound a day!

During the time I was home the weekend  before surgery, a college classmate of mine (I didn’t know her) DID die at NIH of a Cushing’s-related problem. I’m so glad I didn’t find out until reading the alumnae magazine a couple months later!  She was the same class, same major, same home-town, same disease…

We have a Scottish doctor named James Lind to thank for the clinical trial.  He  conducted the first ever clinical trial in 1747 and developed the theory that citrus fruits cured scurvy.  Lind  compared the effects of various different acidic substances, ranging from vinegar to cider, on groups of afflicted sailors, and found that the group who were given oranges and lemons had largely recovered from scurvy after 6 days.

I’d like to think that I advanced the knowledge of Cushing’s at least a little bit by being a guinea  pig in 1987-1989.

From the NIH: http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx

Hope through Research

Several components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conduct and support research on Cushing’s syndrome and other disorders of the endocrine system, including the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Cancer Institute, and the National Center for Research Resources.

NIH-supported scientists are conducting intensive research into the normal and abnormal function of the major endocrine glands and the many hormones of the endocrine system. Researchers continue to study the effects of excess cortisol, including its effect on brain structure and function. To refine the diagnostic process, studies are under way to assess the accuracy of existing screening tests and the effectiveness of new imaging techniques to evaluate patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome. Researchers are also investigating jugular vein sampling as a less invasive alternative to petrosal sinus sampling. Research into treatment options includes study of a new drug to treat the symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH secretion.

Studies are under way to understand the causes of benign endocrine tumor formation, such as those that cause most cases of Cushing’s syndrome. In a few pituitary adenomas, specific gene defects have been identified and may provide important clues to understanding tumor formation. Endocrine factors may also play a role. Increasing evidence suggests that tumor formation is a multistep process. Understanding the basis of Cushing’s syndrome will yield new approaches to therapy.

The NIH supports research related to Cushing’s syndrome at medical centers throughout the United States. Scientists are also treating patients with Cushing’s syndrome at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, MD. Physicians who are interested in referring an adult patient may contact Lynnette Nieman, M.D., at NICHD, 10 Center Drive, Room 1-3140, Bethesda, MD 20892-1109, or by phone at 301-496-8935. Physicians interested in referring a child or adolescent may contact Constantine Stratakis, M.D., D.Sc., at NICHD, 10 Center Drive, Room 1-3330, Bethesda, MD 20892-1103, or by phone at 301-402-1998.

Filed under: Clinical trials, Cushing's | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Hiding In Plain Sight: Florid Cushing’s Disease Presenting As A Severe Extremity Cellulitis

Posted on April 12, 2024 by MaryO

Abstract

Disclosure: C.M. Godar: None. E.B. Noble: None. N.O. Vietor: None. T.S. Knee: None.

Background: Cushing’s syndrome may rarely present as an emergency known as Florid Cushing’s Syndrome. Patients can exhibit severe hyperglycemia, hypertension, hypokalemia, infections, and hypercoagulability. Cushing’s syndrome is a rare disease, and the constellation of clinical features can be overlooked if clinicians are not aware of the manifestations of hypercortisolism. We present the case of a patient with Cushing’s syndrome that went unrecognized with life-threatening sequelae.

Case presentation: A 52-year-old woman with well-controlled type 2 diabetes and hypertension was admitted to the hospital for severe left lower extremity cellulitis. Prior to hospitalization she had noted rapid weight gain, fatigue, weakness, mental clouding, and moodiness. She was admitted for antibiotics and surgical debridement. The infection persisted despite broad spectrum antibiotics, multiple surgical debridements, and skin grafting. She became bacteremic, and extremity amputation was considered. She additionally developed hypertensive emergency, refractory hypokalemia, and hyperglycemia to 396 mg/dL. Exam was notable for facial plethora, supraclavicular fullness, dorsocervical fat pad, and violaceous abdominal striae. Cushing’s Syndrome was suspected, and labs revealed a significantly elevated random serum cortisol of 60.5mcg/dL (Ref 6.2-19.4), significantly elevated 24H urine cortisol of 2157mcg/24H (Ref 0-50), and ACTH elevated to 81.8pg/mL (Ref 7.2-63.3) that confirmed Cushing’s Disease. MRI sella and octreotide scans did not localize a lesion. Inpatient therapy included multiple antihypertensive agents, insulin drip, aggressive potassium repletion, and initiation of ketoconazole to reduce cortisol levels. Ketoconazole was maximally dosed and she underwent surgical exploration and removal of a small pituitary microadenoma. Following surgery, she developed transient adrenal insufficiency requiring hydrocortisone and she no longer required antihypertensives, insulin, or potassium therapy. Follow up 7 years later has revealed no recurrence of Cushing’s Disease.

Discussion: Cushing’s Syndrome may present with a variety of clinical features and rarely may present as a medical emergency. Delay in diagnosis can lead to Florid Cushing’s Syndrome which carries high risk for morbidity and mortality. This case illustrates the need for clinician awareness of the features of Cushing’s Syndrome: hypertension, hyperglycemia, rapid weight gain, cushingoid exam features, hypokalemia, hirsutism, virilization, infection, and/or hypercoagulable state. Severe hypercortisolism was responsible for this patient’s refractory infection, and if not controlled, she likely would have endured a lower extremity amputation. Rapid detection with elevated random serum and/or urine cortisol and treatment with a cortisol-lowering agent is critical and lifesaving.

Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

This content is only available as a PDF.

Filed under: Cushing's, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Day 11, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge 2016

Posted on April 11, 2024 by MaryO

Blue and Yellow – we have those colors on ribbons, websites, T-shirts, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge logos and even cars.

This is the yellow PT cruiser I had rented for the Columbus, OH meeting in 2007.  I didn’t ask for yellow.  That’s just what the rental company gave me.  Somehow, they knew.

This meeting is the one when we all met at Hoggy’s for dinner although some of us travelers stayed at this hotel.

I’m the one in yellow and blue.

Later in 2007, I bought my own truly Cushie Car.  I even managed to get a butterfly on the tags.

So, where did all this blue and yellow come from, anyway?  The answer is so easy and without any thought that it will amaze you!

In July of 2000, I was talking with my dear friend Alice, who ran a wonderful menopause site, Power Surge.  We wondering why there weren’t many support groups online (OR off!) for Cushing’s and I wondered if I could start one myself and we decided that maybe I could.

This website (http://www.cushings-help.com) first went “live” July 21, 2000.  It was a one-page bit of information about Cushing’s.  Nothing fancy.  No message boards, no blogs, no wiki, no image galleries…  Certainly no Cushing’s Awareness Challenges.

I didn’t know much about HTML (yet!) but I knew a little from what Alice had taught me and I used on my music studio site.  I didn’t want to put as much work <COUGH!> into the Cushing’s site as I had on the music studio site so I used a now defunct  WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) web editor called Microsoft FrontPage.

One of their standard templates was – you guessed it! – blue and yellow.

TaDa!  Instant Cushie color scheme forever.  Turns out that the HTML that this software churned out was really awful and had to be entirely redone as the site grew.  But the colors stuck.

Now, in this day of mobile web browsers and people going online on their cellphones, the website is being redone yet again.  But the colors are still, and always, blue and yellow.

Filed under: Cushing's | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Related Factors of Delirium After Transsphenoidal Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection

Posted on April 11, 2024 by MaryO

Highlights

  • Aim to identify independent risk factors for postoperative delirium after pituitary adenoma surgery.
  • Select matched subjects by Propensity Score Matching to reduce potential biases caused by variables.
  • Enhance preoperative communication to minimize the occurrence of delirium, for patients at high risk of postoperative delirium.
  • Minimize surgery duration and general anesthesia, optimize perioperative sedation regimen.
  • Reducing unnecessary or excessive protective physical restraints.

Abstract

Objectives

The primary aim of this study is to explore the factors associated with delirium incidence in postoperative patients who have undergone endoscopic transsphenoidal approach surgery for pituitary adenoma.

Methods

The study population included patients admitted to Tianjin Huanhu Hospital’s Skull Base Endoscopy Center from January to December 2022, selected through a retrospective cohort study design. The presence of perioperative delirium was evaluated using the 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) scale, and the final diagnosis of delirium was determined by clinicians. Statistical analysis included Propensity Score Matching (PSM), χ2 Test, and Binary Logistic Regression.

Results

A total of 213 patients were included in this study, and the incidence of delirium was found to be 29.58 % (63/213). Among them, 126 patients were selected using PSM (delirium:non-delirium = 1:1), ensuring age, gender, and pathology were matched. According to the results of univariate analysis conducted on multiple variables, The binary logistic regression indicated that a history of alcoholism (OR = 6.89, [1.60–29.68], P = 0.010), preoperative optic nerve compression symptoms (OR = 4.30, [1.46–12.65], P = 0.008), operation time ≥3 h (OR = 5.50, [2.01–15.06], P = 0.001), benzodiazepines for sedation (OR = 3.94, [1.40–11.13], P = 0.010), sleep disorder (OR = 3.86, [1.40–10.66], P = 0.009), and physical restraint (OR = 4.53, [1.64–12.53], P = 0.004) as independent risk factors for postoperative delirium following pituitary adenoma surgery.

Conclusions

For pituitary adenoma patients with a history of alcoholism and presenting symptoms of optic nerve compression, as well as an operation time ≥3 h, enhancing communication between healthcare providers and patients, improving perioperative sleep quality, and reducing physical restraint may help decrease the incidence of postoperative delirium.

Introduction

In clinical practice, patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the postoperative period after endoscopic transsphenoidal tumorectomy of pituitary adenoma often experience episodes of delirium. According to a recent retrospective analysis conducted at a single center, the incidence of postoperative delirium among these patients was found to be 10.34 % (n = 360) [1]. Delirium is a common complication following neurosurgery, characterized by acute distraction, confusion in thinking, sleep disorders, and cognitive decline. The incidence of delirium in admitted patients after neurosurgery has been reported to be 19 %, with a range of 12 % to 26 % depending on clinical features and the methods used for delirium assessment [2], [3], [4]. The incidence of postoperative delirium varied across different types of neurosurgical diseases, as reported in a meta-analysis [2]. Specifically, the incidences were 8.0 % for patients with neurological tumors, 20 % for those undergoing functional neurosurgery, 24.0 % for microvascular decompression patients, 19.0 % for traumatic brain injury patients, 42.0 % for neurovascular patients, and 17.0 % for the mixed population undergoing neurosurgery procedures. Furthermore, the incidence rates of delirium in intensive care units (ICUs), general wards, or both combined were found to be 24.0 %, 17 %, and 18 %, respectively.

The aforementioned issue not only leads to prolonged hospital stays and increased healthcare costs, but also exerts a significant impact on patient consciousness and cognitive function. Therefore, early and accurate identification of delirium in post-neurosurgical patients is crucial. However, due to frequent co-occurrence with primary brain injury, related complications can also lead to cognitive impairment or even decreased levels of consciousness, posing challenges for timely and precise identification of delirium. Currently, the primary focus lies in the prevention of delirium within the neurosurgical ICU setting. Early identification and comprehensive pre-surgical assessment are positively significant measures for preventing postoperative delirium occurrence [5], [6]. In this study, a retrospective cohort design was employed to collect pertinent data and statistically analyze the incidence of delirium, as well as its associated influencing factors, among patients admitted to the neurosurgical ICU for pituitary adenoma treatment. And now it is reported as follows.

Section snippets

Patient selection

A retrospective cohort study design was employed to select 213 pituitary adenomas admitted to the Skull Base and Endoscopy Center of Tianjin Huanhu Hospital between January 2022 and December 2022 as the subjects for investigation, with a review of their medical records. The mean age was (50.03 ± 15.72) years, ranging from 20–79 years old (Fig. 1). Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their families, ensuring compliance with the requirements stated in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Inclusion criteria

a.

Propensity score matching

The present study enrolled a total of 213 patients with pituitary tumors, among whom 63 exhibited symptoms related to delirium while the remaining 150 did not. Consequently, the incidence rate of delirium was determined to be 29.58 % in this cohort of patients admitted to the intensive care unit following pituitary tumor surgery. The univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in age (≥65y old, 23.8 % vs. 23.3 %, P = 0.940) and gender (male, 49.2 % vs. 56.7 %, P = 0.318) between the

Background of perioperative delirium in transsphenoidal endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery

The pituitary gland is situated within the sella turcica and comprises two distinct components. The anterior pituitary, known as the adenohypophysis, functions as an endocrine organ responsible for secreting growth hormone, prolactin, adrenocorticotropic hormone, thyrotropin, follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. On the other hand, the posterior pituitary, referred to as the neurohypophysis, serves as a direct extension of the hypothalamus and acts as a storage site for

Conclusions

To enhance the evaluation of postoperative patients at risk of delirium, it is anticipated that optimizing doctor-nurse-patient communication and minimizing unnecessary and indiscriminate protective measures will mitigate the incidence of delirium following pituitary tumor surgery. This study is a single-center prospective study conducted at our institution, which has several inherent limitations. A large-scale multicenter prospective study is anticipated to further investigate the associated

Limitations

There are multiple factors that influence the occurrence of delirium following neurosurgery. This retrospective study solely focused on analyzing and comparing general patient data, medical history, and potential perioperative factors contributing to delirium, without considering any other known or unknown variables in this analysis. The pituitary gland functions as a neuroendocrine organ involved in the regulation of neuroendocrine processes. Changes in hormone levels following surgery for

Funding

All authors affirm that this study was conducted without any fund support from external organizations.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Shusheng Zhang: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Yanan Chen: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. Xiudong Wang: Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Jun Liu: Software, Formal analysis, Data curation. Yueda Chen: Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation. Guobin Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Treatments | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »