Day 20, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 20, 2026 by MaryO

And today, we talk about pink jeeps and ziplines…

How in the world did we get here in a Cushing’s Challenge?  I’m sliding these in because earlier I linked (possibly!) my growth hormone use as a cause of my cancer – and I took the GH due to Cushing’s issues.  Clear?  LOL

I had found out that I had my kidney cancer on Friday, April 28, 2006 and my surgery on May 9, 2006.  I was supposed to go on a Cushie Cruise to Bermuda on May 14, 2006.  My surgeon said that there was no way I could go on that cruise and I could not postpone my surgery until after that cruise.

I got out of the hospital on the day that the other Cushies left for the cruise and realized that I wouldn’t have been much (ANY!) fun and I wouldn’t have had any.

An especially amusing thread from that cruise is The Adventures of Penelopee Cruise (on the Cushing’s Help message boards).  Someone had brought a UFC jug and  decorated her and had her pose around the ship.

The beginning text reads:

Penelopee had a lovely time on Explorer of the Seas which was a five day cruise to Bermuda. She needed something to cheer her up since her brother, Tom, went off the deep end, but that’s another story!

Penelopee wanted to take in all of the sights and sounds of this lovely vessel. Every day she needed to do at least one special thing. Being a Cushie, she didn’t have enough spoons to do too much every day.

On the first day, she went sunning on the Libido deck……she didn’t last too long, only about 10 minutes. Goodness, look at her color! Do you think maybe her ACTH is too high?

Although I missed this trip, I was feeling well enough to go to Sedona, Arizona in August, 2006.  I convinced everyone that I was well enough to go off-road in a pink jeep,  DH wanted to report me to my surgeon but I survived without to much pain and posed for the header image.

In 2009, I figured I have “extra years” since I survived the cancer and I wanted to do something kinda scary, yet fun. So, somehow, I decided on ziplining. Tom wouldn’t go with me but Michael would so I set this up almost as soon as we booked a Caribbean cruise to replace the Cushie Cruise to Bermuda.

Each person had a harness around their legs with attached pulleys and carabiners. Women had them on their chests as well. In addition, we had leather construction gloves and hard hats.

We climbed to the top of the first platform and were given brief instructions and off we went. Because of the heavy gloves, I couldn’t get any pictures. I had thought that they would take some of us on the hardest line to sell to us later but they didn’t. They also didn’t have cave pictures or T-Shirts. What a missed opportunity!

This was so cool, so much fun. I thought I might be afraid at first but I wasn’t. I just followed instructions and went.

Sometimes they told us to break. We did that with the right hand, which was always on the upper cable.

After the second line, I must have braked too soon because I stopped before I got to the platform. Michael was headed toward me. The guide on the end of the platform wanted me to do some hand over hand maneuver but I couldn’t figure out what he was saying so he came and got me by wrapping his legs around me and pulling me to the platform.

After that, no more problems with braking!

The next platform was very high – over 70 feet in the air – and the climb up was difficult. It was very hot and the rocks were very uneven. I don’t know that I would have gotten to the next platform if Michael hadn’t cheered me on all the way.

We zipped down the next six lines up to 250-feet between platforms and 85-feet high in the trees, at canopy level. It seemed like it was all over too soon.

But, I did it! No fear, just fun.

Enough of adventures – fun ones like these, and scary ones like transsphenoidal surgery and radical nephrectomy!

Filed under: Cancer, Cushing's | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Day 7, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 7, 2026 by MaryO

On Becoming Empowered. Adapted from my blog post Participatory Medicine

The Society for Participatory Medicine - MemberThis is kind of a “cheat” post since it’s a compilation of other posts, web pages, message board posts and some original thoughts.  I wrote it to submit to Robin’s Grand Rounds, hosted  on her blog.

For all of my early life, I was the good, compliant, patient.  I took whatever pills the doctor prescribed, did whatever tests h/she (most always a he) wrote for.  Believed that whatever he said was the absolute truth.  He had been to med school.  He knew what was wrong with me even though he didn’t live in my body 24/7 and experience what I did.

I know a lot of people are still like this.  Their doctor is like a god to them.  He can do no wrong – even if they don’t feel any better after treatment, even if they feel worse.  “But the doctor said…”

Anyway, I digress.

All this changed for me in 1983.

At first I noticed I’d stopped having my periods and, of course, I thought I was pregnant. I went to my Gynecologist who had no explanation. Lots of women lose their periods for a variety of reasons so no one thought that this was really significant.

Then I got really tired, overly tired. I would take my son to a half hour Choir rehearsal and could not stay awake for the whole time. I would lie down in the back of the van, set an alarm and sleep for the 30 minutes.

A whole raft of other symptoms started appearing – I grew a beard (Hirsuitism), gained weight even though I was on Weight Watchers and working out at the gym nearly every day, lost my period, everything hurt, got what is called a “moon face” and a “buffalo hump” on the back of my neck. I also got stretch marks. I was very depressed but it’s hard to say if that was because of the hormone imbalance or because I felt so bad and no one would listen to me.

I came across a little article in the Ladies Home Journal magazine which said “If you have these symptoms…ask your doctor about Cushing’s”. After that, I started reading everything I could on Cushing’s and asking my doctors. Due to all my reading at the library and medical books I bought, I was sure I had Cushing’s but no one would believe me. Doctors would say that Cushing’s Disease is too rare, that I was making this up and that I couldn’t have it.

I asked doctors for three years – PCP, gynecologist, neurologist, podiatrist – all said the now-famous refrain.  It’s too rare.  You couldn’t have Cushing’s.  I kept persisting in my reading, making copies of library texts even when I didn’t understand them, keeping notes.  I just knew that someone, somewhere would “discover” that I had Cushing’s.

My husband was on the doctors’ sides.  He was sure it was all in my mind (as opposed to all in my head!) and he told me to just think “happy thoughts” and it would all go away.

A Neurologist gave me Xanax. Since he couldn’t see my tumor with his Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machine there was “no possibility” that it existed. Boy was he wrong!

Later in 1986 I started bruising incredibly easily. I could touch my skin and get a bruise. On New Year’s Day of 1987 I started bleeding under the skin. My husband made circles around the outside perimeter each hour with a marker, like the rings of a tree. When I went to my Internist the next day he was shocked at the size. He now thought I had a blood disorder so he sent me to a Hematologist/Oncologist.

Fortunately, the Hematologist/Oncologist ran a twenty-four hour urine test and really looked at me. Both he and his partner recognized that I had Cushing’s. Of course, he was sure that he did the diagnosis.  No matter that I had been pursuing this with other doctors for 3 years.

It was not yet determined if it was Cushing’s Disease (Pituitary) or Syndrome (Adrenal). However, he couldn’t help me any further so the Hematologist referred me to an Endocrinologist.

The Endocrinologist, of course, didn’t trust the other tests I had had done so I was back to square one. He ran his own multitude of tests. He had to draw blood at certain times like 9 AM. and 5 PM. There was a dexamethasone suppression test where I took a pill at 10 p.m. and gave blood at 9 am the next day. I collected gallons of urine in BIG boxes (Fun in the fridge!). Those were from 6 a.m. to 6 a.m. to be delivered to his office by 9 a.m. same day. I was always worried that I’d be stopped in rush hour and the police would ask about what was in that big container. I think I did those for a week. He also did standard neurological tests and asked lots of questions.

When the endo confirmed that I had Cushing’s in 1987 he sent me to a local hospital where they repeated all those same tests for another week and decided that it was not my adrenal gland (Cushing’s Syndrome) creating the problem. The doctors and nurses had no idea what to do with me, so they put me on the brain cancer ward.

When I left this hospital after a week, we didn’t know any more than we had before.

As luck would have it, NIH (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) was doing a clinical trial of Cushing’s. I live in the same area as NIH so it was not too inconvenient but very scary at first to think of being tested there. At that time I only had a choice of NIH, Mayo Clinic and a place in Quebec to do this then-rare pituitary surgery called a Transsphenoidal Resection. I chose NIH – closest and free. After I was interviewed by the Doctors there, I got a letter that I had been accepted into the clinical trial. The first time I was there was for 6 weeks as an inpatient. More of the same tests.

There were about 12 of us there and it was nice not to be alone with this mystery disease. Many of these Cushies (mostly women) were getting bald, couldn’t walk, having strokes, had diabetes. One was blind, one had a heart attack while I was there. Towards the end of my testing period, I was looking forward to the surgery just to get this whole mess over with. While I was at NIH, I was gaining about a pound a day!

The MRI still showed nothing, so they did a Petrosal Sinus Sampling Test. That scared me more than the prospect of surgery. (This test carries the risk of stroke and uncontrollable bleeding from the incision points.) Catheters were fed from my groin area to my pituitary gland and dye was injected. I could watch the whole procedure on monitors. I could not move during this test or for several hours afterwards to prevent uncontrolable bleeding from a major artery. The test did show where the tumor probably was located. Also done were more sophisticated dexamethasone suppression tests where drugs were administered by IV and blood was drawn every hour (they put a heplock in my arm so they don’t have to keep sticking me). I got to go home for a weekend and then went back for the surgery – the Transsphenoidal Resection. I fully expected to die during surgery (and didn’t care if I did) so I signed my will and wrote last letters to those I wanted to say goodbye to. During the time I was home just before surgery, a college classmate of mine (I didn’t know her) did die at NIH of a Cushing’s-related problem. I’m so glad I didn’t find out until a couple months later!

November 3, 1987, the surgeon, Dr. Ed Oldfield, cut the gum above my front teeth under my upper lip so there is no scar. He used tiny tools and microscopes. My tumor was removed successfully. In some cases (not mine) the surgeon uses a plug of fat from the abdomen to help seal the cut. Afterwards, I was in intensive care overnight and went to a neurology ward for a few days until I could walk without being dizzy. I had some major headaches for a day or two but they gave me drugs (morphine) for those. Also, I had cotton plugs in my nostrils. It was a big day when they came out. I had diabetes insipidus (DI) for a little while, but that went away by itself – thank goodness!

I had to use a foam product called “Toothies” to brush my teeth without hitting the incision. Before they let me go home, I had to learn to give myself an injection in my thigh. They sent me home with a supply of injectible cortisone in case my level ever fell too low (it didn’t). I was weaned gradually off cortisone pills (scary). I now take no medications. I had to get a Medic Alert bracelet. I will always need to tell medical staff when I have any kind of procedure – the effects of my excess cortisone will remain forever.

I went back to the NIH for several follow-up visits of a week each where they did all the blood and urine testing again. After a few years NIH set me free. Now I go to my “outside” endocrinologist every year for the dexamethasone suppression test, 24-hour urine and regular blood testing.

As I get further away from my surgery, I have less and less chance that my tumor will grow back. I have never lost all the weight I gained and I still have the hair on my chin but most of my other symptoms are gone. I am still and always tired and need a nap most days. I do not, however, still need to take whole days off just to sleep.

I consider myself very lucky that I was treated before I got as bad as some of the others on my floor at NIH but think it is crazy that these symptoms are not taken seriously by doctors.

My story goes on and if you’re interested some is on this blog and some is here:

Forbes Magazine | MaryO’s bio | Cushing’s and Cancer Blog | Guest Speakers | Interview Archive  1/3/08 | Cushing’s Awareness Day Testimonial Archive |

Because of this experience in getting a Cushing’s diagnosis – and later, a prescription for growth hormone – I was concerned that there were probably other people not being diagnosed with Cushing’s. When I searched online for Cushing’s, all the sites that came up were for dogs and horses with Cushing’s.  Not what I was looking for!

In July of 2000, I was talking with my dear friend Alice, who ran a wonderful menopause site, Power Surge, wondering why there weren’t many support groups online (OR off!) for Cushing’s.  This thought percolated through my mind for a few hours and I realized that maybe this was my calling.  Maybe I should be the one to start a network of support for other “Cushies” to help them empower themselves.

I wanted to educate others about the awful disease that took doctors years of my life to diagnose and treat – even after I gave them the information to diagnose me.  I didn’t want anyone else to suffer for years like I did.  I wanted doctors to pay more attention to Cushing’s disease.

The first website (http://www.cushings-help.com) went “live” July 21, 2000.  It was just a single page of information. The message boards began September 30, 2000 with a simple message board which then led to a larger one, and a larger.  Today, in 2016, we have over 12 thousand members and many others on Facebook.  Some “rare disease”!

The message boards are now very active and we have weekly online text chats, weekly live interviews, local meetings, conferences, email newsletters, a clothing exchange, a Cushing’s Awareness Day Forum, podcasts, phone support and much more. Because I wanted to spread the word to others not on “the boards” we have extended out to social networking sites – twitter groups, facebook groups, interviews, websites, chat groups, LinkedIn, Tumblr, Pinterest and much, much more.

People are becoming more empowered and participating in their own diagnoses, testing and treatment.  This have changed a lot since 1983!

When I had my Cushing’s nearly 30 years ago, I never thought that I would meet another Cushing’s patient in real life or online. Back then, I’d never even been aware that there was anything like an “online”. I’m so glad that people struggling with Cushing’s today don’t have to suffer anymore thinking that they’re the only one who deals with this.

Because of my work on the websites – and, believe me it is a ton of work! – I have had the honor of meeting over a hundred other Cushies personally at local meetings, conferences, at NIH (the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD where I had my final diagnosis and surgery). It occurred to me once that this is probably more than most endocrinologists will ever see in their entire career. I’ve also talked to countless others on the phone. Amazing for a “rare” disease!

I don’t know what pushed me in 1983, how I got the confidence and self-empowerment to challenge these doctors and their non-diagnoses over the years.  I’m glad that I didn’t suffer any longer than I did and I’m glad that I have a role in helping others to find the medical help that they need.

What do *YOU* think?  How are you becoming empowered?

Filed under: Clinical trials, Cushing's, Diagnostic Testing, pituitary, Rare Diseases, symptoms, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Day 6, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 6, 2026 by MaryO

In March of 1987, after the endo finally  confirmed that I had Cushing’s, I was sent to a local hospital where they repeated all those same tests for another week and decided that it was not my adrenal gland (Cushing’s Syndrome) creating the problem. The doctors and nurses had no idea what to do with me, so they put me on the brain cancer ward.

When I left this hospital after a week, we didn’t know any more than we had before.

As luck would have it, NIH (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) was doing a clinical trial of Cushing’s. I live in the same area as NIH so it was not too inconvenient but very scary at first to think of being tested there. At that time I only had a choice of NIH, Mayo Clinic and a place in Quebec to do this then-rare pituitary surgery called a Transsphenoidal Resection.

My husband asked my endo if it were his wife, if he would recommend this surgery.  The endo responded that he was divorcing his wife – he didn’t care what happened to her.  Oh, my!

I chose NIH – closest and free. After I was interviewed by the doctors there, I got a letter that I had been accepted into the clinical trial.

The night before I was admitted, I signed my will.  I was sure I was going to die there.  If not during testing, as a result of surgery.

The first time I was there was for 6 weeks as an inpatient. More of the same tests.

There were about 12 of us there and it was nice not to be alone with this mystery disease. Many of these Cushies (mostly women) were getting bald, couldn’t walk, having strokes, had diabetes. One was blind, one had a heart attack while I was there. Several were from Greece.

My first roommate was a nurse.  She spent the entire first night screaming in pain.  I was very glad when they moved me to a new room!

Towards the end of my testing period, I was looking forward to the surgery just to get this whole mess over with – either a cure or dying. While I was at NIH, I was gaining about a pound a day!

During the time I was home the weekend  before surgery, a college classmate of mine (I didn’t know her) DID die at NIH of a Cushing’s-related problem. I’m so glad I didn’t find out until reading the alumnae magazine a couple months later!  She was the same class, same major, same home-town, same disease…

We have a Scottish doctor named James Lind to thank for the clinical trial.  He  conducted the first ever clinical trial in 1747 and developed the theory that citrus fruits cured scurvy.  Lind  compared the effects of various different acidic substances, ranging from vinegar to cider, on groups of afflicted sailors, and found that the group who were given oranges and lemons had largely recovered from scurvy after 6 days.

I’d like to think that I advanced the knowledge of Cushing’s at least a little bit by being a guinea  pig in 1987-1989.

From the NIH: http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx

Hope through Research

Several components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conduct and support research on Cushing’s syndrome and other disorders of the endocrine system, including the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Cancer Institute, and the National Center for Research Resources.

NIH-supported scientists are conducting intensive research into the normal and abnormal function of the major endocrine glands and the many hormones of the endocrine system. Researchers continue to study the effects of excess cortisol, including its effect on brain structure and function. To refine the diagnostic process, studies are under way to assess the accuracy of existing screening tests and the effectiveness of new imaging techniques to evaluate patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome. Researchers are also investigating jugular vein sampling as a less invasive alternative to petrosal sinus sampling. Research into treatment options includes study of a new drug to treat the symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH secretion.

Studies are under way to understand the causes of benign endocrine tumor formation, such as those that cause most cases of Cushing’s syndrome. In a few pituitary adenomas, specific gene defects have been identified and may provide important clues to understanding tumor formation. Endocrine factors may also play a role. Increasing evidence suggests that tumor formation is a multistep process. Understanding the basis of Cushing’s syndrome will yield new approaches to therapy.

The NIH supports research related to Cushing’s syndrome at medical centers throughout the United States. Scientists are also treating patients with Cushing’s syndrome at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, MD. Physicians who are interested in referring an adult patient may contact Lynnette Nieman, M.D., at NICHD, 10 Center Drive, Room 1-3140, Bethesda, MD 20892-1109, or by phone at 301-496-8935. Physicians interested in referring a child or adolescent may contact Constantine Stratakis, M.D., D.Sc., at NICHD, 10 Center Drive, Room 1-3330, Bethesda, MD 20892-1103, or by phone at 301-402-1998.

Filed under: Clinical trials, Cushing's | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Day 1: Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 1, 2026 by MaryO

April is always Cushing’s Awareness Challenge month because Dr. Harvey Cushing was born on April 8th, 1869.

30-posts

Thanks to Robin for this wonderful past logo!  I’ve participated in these 30 days for Cushing’s Awareness several times so I’m not quite sure what is left to say this year but I always want to get the word out when I can.

As I see it, there have been some strides the diagnosis or treatment of Cushing’s since last year.  More drug companies are getting involved, more doctors seem to be willing to test, a bit more awareness, maybe.

April Fool's Day

How fitting that this challenge should begin on April Fool’s Day.  So much of Cushing’s  Syndrome/Disease makes us Cushies seem like we’re the April Fool.  Maybe, just maybe, it’s the doctors who are the April Fools…

Doctors tell us Cushing’s is too rare – you couldn’t possibly have it.  April Fools!

All you have to do is exercise and diet.  You’ll feel better.  April Fools!

Those bruises on your legs?  You’re just clumsy. April Fools!

Sorry you’re growing all that hair on your chin.  That happens as you age, you know.  April Fools!

Did you say you sleep all day?  You’re just lazy.  If you exercised more, you’d have more energy. April Fools!

You don’t have stretch marks.  April Fools!

You have stretch marks but they are the wrong [color/length/direction] April Fools!

The hump on the back of your neck is from your poor posture. April Fools!

Your MRI didn’t show a tumor.  You couldn’t have Cushing’s. April Fools!

This is all in your mind.  Take this prescription for antidepressants and go home.  April Fools!

If you have this one surgery, your life will get back to normal within a few months. April Fools!

What?  You had transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s?  You wasted your time and money. April Fools!

I am the doctor.  I know everything.  Do not try to find out any information online. You could not have Cushing’s.  It’s too rare…  April FOOL!

All this reminds me of a wonderful video a message board member posted a while ago:

So now – who is the April Fool?  It wasn’t me.  Don’t let it be you, either!

Filed under: Cushing's, Diagnostic Testing, Rare Diseases, symptoms, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Disease Remission and Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Cushing Disease: A Single Center Experience

Posted on February 1, 2026 by MaryO

Introduction

Transsphenoidal surgery is the primary treatment for patients with Cushing disease (CD). This study assessed the surgical and endocrinologic outcomes of patients with CD following endoscopic pituitary surgery using strict biochemical criteria to guide surveillance in patients not achieving early remission.

Methods

The medical records of all patients with CD who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery at a single institution between 2004 and 2025 were reviewed. Remission was defined as a fasting serum cortisol level <50 nmol/L (1.8 μg/dL) either basal or after 1 mg dexamethasone.

Results

A total of 125 patients were diagnosed with CD and had a primary endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery during the study period (median age 48 years [range: 14–79 years; M:F 93:32). Fifty-seven patients (45.6%) had a microadenoma, 41 (32.8%) had a macroadenoma, and 26 (20.8%) had no demonstrable focal lesion on pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (MRI-negative CD). The median length of follow-up was 3.1 years (range: 1 month to 16.7 years). Initial remission rates 3 months after surgery were: 72.0% for patients with MRI-negative CD, 77.2% for microadenomas, and 48.7% for macroadenomas. Age, male sex, MRI-negative, and single operation were predictors of remission. Patients who achieved remission at 3 months were significantly more likely to be in remission at last follow-up after accounting for patient and tumor characteristics. The 5-year recurrence rate following remission was 6.9%.

Conclusion

Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is an effective first-line treatment for patients with CD but a significant minority will relapse. Close biochemical surveillance of patients who fail to achieve remission may support the use of early adjuvant radiotherapy.

Key words

Cushing disease
Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery
Remission

Abbreviations

CD

Cushing’s Disease
CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid
DI

Diabetes insipidus
MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Introduction

Cushing disease (CD) is a rare endocrine disease caused by the circulation of excess cortisol due to hypersecretion of adrenocorticotrophic hormone from a pituitary adenoma. The annual incidence of CD is estimated to be between 1.2 and 2.4 million cases per year1, 2, 3 although it may be higher in selected patient populations such as those with poorly controlled diabetes and young patients with osteoporosis or hypertension.4 Untreated CD is associated with a very poor prognosis and a significantly reduced 5-year survival mandating prompt and effective treatment.5 Nevertheless, long-term management of patients with CD remains challenging.
In most cases of CD, the pituitary adenoma is benign and excellent remission rates have been reported with surgical treatment.6, 7, 8 Comparable remission rates of around 80% have been reported with both microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery,7,8 however the basal serum cortisol level used to define remission varies significantly in the literature (50–138 nmol/L). Several previous studies have also excluded macroadenomas and invasive tumors from longitudinal analysis. As such, there is a paucity of long-term clinical data for an unselected population undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery for CD. Furthermore, there is little evidence concerning the optimal management of patients who fail to enter complete biochemical remission (basal serum cortisol level <50 nmol/L [1.8 μg/dL]) following their initial surgical treatment.
The aim of this study was to assess the treatment pathway and long-term outcomes of consecutive patients treated at a regional treatment center over a 20-year period. All surgical cases were performed using a purely endoscopic approach and we evaluated the impact surgical experience on clinical outcomes. We assessed biochemical remission rates immediately following surgery (within 2 weeks of surgery), at 3 months and at the patient’s most recent follow-up appointment and analyzed predictors of successful remission in our patient group. For those who did not achieve biochemical remission, we detail the treatment course of patients placed under surveillance and those who underwent adjuvant therapy. In doing so, we illustrate a complete picture of the surgical outcomes and subsequent management of an unselected population that may be encountered during the treatment of patients with CD at a dedicated regional center.

Methods

Study Population

We analyzed the medical records of all patients diagnosed with CD who underwent primary surgical treatment at King’s College Hospital, London, between January 2004 and January 2025. Patients were identified from our prospective pituitary multidisciplinary database and cross-referenced with data from the hospital’s clinical coding department and operative database.

Preoperative Investigations

Serum cortisol was measured by chemiluminescent assay (Siemens ADVIA Centaur XP) with a sensitivity of 0.0362 nmol/L. A diagnosis of Cushing syndrome was confirmed by a serum cortisol measurement of >50 nmol/L after administering a 1-mg low-dose dexamethasone suppression test. Additional 24-hour urinary free cortisol measurements (>50 μg/24 hours), late night salivary cortisol measurements (>4 nmol/L), plasma adrenocorticotrophic hormone levels (pg/mL), and 48-hour 2-mg low-dose dexamethasone suppression tests were performed as required. All patients with confirmed Cushing syndrome underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary gland and in equivocal cases patients also underwent corticotrophin-releasing hormone stimulation, high-dose dexamethasone suppression test, and/or inferior petrosal sinus sampling before proceeding to surgery.

Surgical Procedure

Surgery was performed via an endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach in all study patients as described by Jho9 and Cappabianca.10 Image guidance was used in patients with complex or atypical sinus or vascular anatomy, those with very small microadenomas, and in patients undergoing repeat surgery. Complete hypophysectomy (sellar clearance) was performed for patients with MRI-negative Cushing disease. The histological pseudocapsular technique was employed to permit wide exposure of the sella, pituitary, and parasellar region.11,12 If a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was identified intraoperatively, an autologous adipose tissue graft was positioned in the pituitary fossa and sphenoid sinus and in selected cases a vascularized naso-septal flap was also positioned over the defect.

Postoperative Investigations and Follow-up

Our postoperative protocol included endocrinologic assessment in the early postoperative period, within 72 hours of surgery, and again within the first 2 weeks following surgery. The patient’s initial treatment strategy was defined as any surgical management within 30 days of the patient’s first surgical procedure. If a postoperative CSF leak was suspected, samples of fluid were sent for confirmatory testing of β-2-transferrin. Management of the CSF leak was determined by its severity and included observation alone, insertion of a lumbar drain and a period of bed rest, and surgical repair. Postoperative diabetes insipidus was defined as patients with polyuria requiring ongoing desmopressin therapy 6 months after surgery.
Long-term biochemical assessment of cortisol status was performed on an annual basis, or more frequently depending on the patient’s individual status. A routine postoperative MRI scan was also performed 3 months postoperatively. Remission was defined as an early morning serum cortisol of <50 nmol/L (1.8 μg/dL) requiring substitutive therapy at 3 months postoperatively. Patients who failed to enter remission were considered for further pituitary surgery, radiotherapy, medical treatment, and/or bilateral adrenalectomy. Recurrence was defined as the re-emergence of clinical features of cortisol excess supported by biochemical evidence of cortisol excess as described above. Persistent disease was defined as such was defined as a postoperative basal cortisol(s) > 50 nmol/.

Data Collection

We reviewed the biochemical, radiologic, medical, and surgical records of all study patients. The following data were collected: demographic features, preoperative endocrinologic measurements, radiologic MRI features of the tumor (including tumor visibility on MRI and size), procedural complications (including CSF leak, meningitis, diabetes insipidus [DI], hematoma, visual complications, or new cranial nerve deficits), postoperative endocrinologic assessments, and any further treatments performed.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical data are summarized using frequencies and percentages and continuous data are described using means, standard deviations, medians, and ranges. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using Fisher’s Exact test. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed in which remission statuses at (i) 3 months and (ii) last follow-up were used as outcome variables. The list of predictors of each outcome included patient characteristics (sex, age), tumor category, number of operations performed, and the presence of postoperational complications, which were decided a priori. Subgroup analyses were also performed based on tumor category—microadenomas, macroadenomas, and MRI-negative CD.
Data were collated in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). All statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022; r-project.org). P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by King’s College Hospital’s research committee without the need for informed consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethics standards of the institution’s research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

A total of 125 patients including 93 (74.4%) female patients and 32 (25.6%) male patients were diagnosed with CD and had primary endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery during the study period. The median age was 48 years (range: 14–79 years). Fifty-seven patients (45.6%) had a microadenoma, 41 (32.8%) had a macroadenoma, and 26 (20.8%) had no demonstrable focal lesion on pituitary MRI (MRI-negative CD). The median length of follow-up was 3.1 years (range: 1 month to 16.7 years). Of the 125 patients included in our study, 88 patients (70.4%) had a single operation during their initial treatment strategy. Thirty-seven patients (29.6%) had more than 1 operation; 4 patients (3.2%) had 3 operations during the study period. A summary of the baseline characteristics of our patients can be found in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population

Number of Patients 125
Patient variables
 Age Median 48 (range: 14–79) years
 Male 32 (25.6%)
Pituitary characteristics
 Microadenoma 57 (45.6%)
 Macroadenoma 41 (32.8%)
 No focal lesion on pituitary MRI (MRI-negative Cushing’ disease) 26 (20.8%)
Operative variables
 Single operation 88 (70.4%)
 More than 1 operation 33 (26.4%)
 3 operations 4 (3.2%)

Perioperative Complications

Forty patients (32.0%) had a complication following their surgery (Table 2). The overall complication rate for patients undergoing a single procedure was 23.9% (21 of 88) and was significantly lower than the complication rate in patients who had multiple operations: 51.3% (19 of 37) (P = 0.002). The complication rates for different tumor types were not significantly different: microadenoma 33.3% (19 of 57), macroadenoma 36.6% (15 of 41), MRI-negative CD 23.1% (6 of 26) (P = 0.274). There was a significant difference between complications in the second period; Period 1: 8.7% (2 of 23) and Period 2: 37.3% (38 of 102) (P = 0.008).

Table 2. Procedural Complications Encountered in Our Series

Complication N (%)
Any complication 40 (32.0%)
Persistent diabetes insipidus 18 (14.4%)
Cerebrospinal fluid leak 17 (13.6%)
Meningitis 2 (1.6%)
Ventriculitis 1 (0.8%)
Bleeding/haematoma 4 (3.2%)
Visual deterioration 2 (1.6%)
Death 3 (2.4%)
Eighteen patients (14.4%) developed persistent DI following surgery (requiring treatment for more than 6 months which we considered as a complication). Separately, in 12 patients (9.6%) the DI was transient and resolved spontaneously within 6 months of surgery, and 34 patients (27.2%) recovered from transient DI before discharge.
A confirmed postoperative CSF leak occurred in 17 patients (13.6%) and was significantly higher in patients who had multiple procedures; the CSF leak rate was 16.2% (6 of 37) in patients who had multiple procedures versus 12.5% (11 of 88) in those who only had a single procedure (P = 0.004). The type of tumor did not affect the CSF leak rate (P = 0.737). In 3 (2.4%) patients, the leak settled with observation alone. Three (2.4%) patients were managed with only a lumbar drain and 11 (8.8%) patients underwent surgical repair either as an executive decision or after failed lumbar drain. There were 2 (1.6%) cases with new cranial nerve deficits following surgery presenting with visual deterioration and a partial sixth nerve palsy. Two patients developed meningitis (1.6%), 1 (0.8%) developed ventriculitis. Four patients (3.2%) developed postoperative bleeding or hematoma requiring surgical attention.
Three (2.4%) patients died in the immediate perioperative period. One (0.8%) patient developed acute respiratory failure and suffered a cardiac arrest. Significant intraoperative bleeding was encountered in the other 2 cases (1.6%); 1 (0.8%) subsequently died of acute cardiorespiratory instability and the other (0.8%) died because of multiorgan failure following a prolonged stay on the intensive care unit.

Disease Remission

The overall remission rate 2 weeks following surgery was 59.0% (72 of 122), increasing to 60.7% (74 of 122) at 3 months. The remission rate 3 months following surgery was 72.0% (18 of 25) for patients with MRI-negative CD, 77.2% (44 of 57) for microadenomas, and 48.7% (19/39) for macroadenomas. Following adjuvant treatment and further surgery, the overall remission rate at last follow up was 68.0% (85 of 125).
Age, patient sex, tumor category and the number of operations were significant predictors of remission at three months. Age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07, P = 0.009), male sex (aOR: 4.15, 95% CI: 1.64–10.53, P = 0.003), MRI-negative CD (aOR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.24–4.07, P = 0.008), and single operation (aOR: 3.87, 95% CI: 1.56–9.61, P = 0.004), were predictors of remission at 3 months (Table 3).

Table 3. Multivariable Logistic Regression for Predictors of Remission at Last Follow-up

Outcome Predictor Multivariable Analysis
Adjusted OR (95% CI) P Value
Remission at 3 months Age 1.04 (95%CI: 1.01–1.07) 0.009
Sex† 3.31 (95%CI: 1.31–8.40) 0.011
MRI-negative Cushing disease‡ 1.88 (95%CI: 1.06–3.35) 0.031
Single operation§ 3.87 (95%CI: 1.56–9.61) 0.004
Remission at last follow-up Age 1.00 (95%CI: 0.97–1.04) 0.904
Sex† 2.92 (95%CI: 0.89–9.62) 0.003
MRI-negative Cushing disease‡ 1.84 (95%CI: 0.89–3.79) 0.008
Single operation§ 1.24 (95%CI: 0.36–4.24) 0.730
Remission at 3 months∗ 27.0 (95%CI: 8.47–83.33) <0.001
∗
No remission is used as the reference group.
†
Female is used as the reference group.
‡
Microadenoma is used as the reference group.
§
Multiple operation is used as the reference group.
Additionally, patients were more likely to be in remission at last follow-up if they had achieved remission at 3 months, compared with those who had not (aOR: 31.25, 95% CI: 11.2–90.9, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, this remained significant (aOR: 27.0, 95% CI: 8.47–83.33, P < 0.001).
Of the 72 patients who entered remission following surgery, 5 patients (6.9%) had relapsed at their last follow-up. Further intervention was performed/planned in all patients exhibiting recurrence, including repeat surgery and radiotherapy. Four of the 5 recurrences (80.0%) happened within the first 5 years.

Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy

In total, 48.0% (60 of 125) and 40.8% (51 of 125) patients required growth hormone replacement therapy at three months and at last endocrine follow up. Nine (15.0%) patients who initially needed growth hormone replacement, no longer required it at last endocrine follow-up.

Secondary Intervention

Patients with persistent disease are very likely to require a secondary intervention within a short time after initial surgery. The rate of secondary endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery was more common in patients with persistent disease (22 of 53, 41.5%) than those in initial remission (15 of 72, 20.8%) (aOR: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.48–8.38, P = 0.004). The ongoing management of patients with active disease with was tailored to the patient and included medical therapy with metyrapone, chemotherapy (temozolamide), bilateral adrenalectomy, and radiotherapy; either alone or in combination.

DISCUSSION

In one of the largest modern series in the literature, we reviewed the treatment pathway and long-term outcomes of consecutive patients treated for CD at a single regional treatment center over a 20-year period. Several previous studies have examined the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing microscopic surgery and a recent meta-analysis compared the early clinical outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic surgery.7 However, there remains little evidence concerning the optimal long-term management of CD patients who do not immediately enter remission following surgery. Given the potential complications of CD and the challenges in managing recurrent disease, our center considers treating any patient with a cortisol of >50 nmol/L (1.8 μg/dL).

Remission

A postoperative cortisol of <50nmol/L is a good predictor of remission but not a guarantee and patients should be advised accordingly. The most conclusive finding of our study was that patients who achieved remission at 3 months were 3 times as likely to still be in remission at their last follow-up, having accounted patient and tumor characteristics. The overall initial 3-month remission rate for patients in our series was 60.7% and is comparable to other studies that have used a similarly low early morning serum cortisol level of <50 nmol/L (1.8 μg/dL) to define remission.13, 14, 15 Despite this, patients achieving early remission remain at risk of relapse with a 5-year recurrence rate of 6.9%. In addition, those with persistent disease are very likely to require a secondary intervention within a short time after initial surgery.
Using an early morning serum cortisol level of 50 nmol/L(1.8 μg/dL). to define remission enabled us to label a subgroup of patients with moderately lowered cortisol levels (50–150 nmol/L [1.8–5.4 μg/dL]) that were placed under close surveillance. It has been demonstrated that patients with postoperative cortisol of 55–137nmol/L (equivalent to 2–5.4 μg/dL) have a higher risk of late recurrence.12 We considered patients with a cortisol of greater than 150 nmol/L to be candidates for early secondary intervention without delay.
Radiotherapy, delivered by conventional external beam radiotherapy or via stereotactic radiosurgery, is typically used as a second-line treatment in CD patients after failure of initial or repeat pituitary surgery.8 In other centers, patients with similar moderately lowered cortisol level would have been labeled as being in remission and would not have been offered adjuvant radiotherapy. However, by closely observing the biochemical trends of these patients in the months following surgery we were able to offer further intervention at an earlier stage, thus avoiding the potentially harmful sequelae of untreated CD. In future work, it would be helpful to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with moderately lowered serum cortisol levels who received early adjuvant therapy with patients who had similar biochemical results but did not receive adjuvant treatment.
Finally, we observed a statistically and clinically significant association between patient sex and tumor type on remission—a finding not previously reported. The underlying reasons for this result are unclear but further work should examine if, and how, the biology and histologic characteristics of adenomas changes with sex and age.9,16, 17, 18

Complications

Previous studies elected not to report the overall complication rate, hence at first sight, our overall complication rate of 32.0% may appear high even though the rate of individual specific complications are similar to those previously reported (Table 2).7, 8,15, 19 Postoperative complications were significantly higher in patients who underwent more procedures.
The overall perioperative mortality rate of 2.4% (n = 3) observed in this series is comparable with other published studies.7,8 One patient developed acute respiratory failure in the early postoperative period and died on day 3 following surgery. In the other cases significant intracavernous and intracranial bleeding was encountered and controlled; one patient subsequently developed acute cardiorespiratory instability and died on day 5; the other developed multiorgan failure and died following a prolonged stay on the intensive care unit. Following an internal review of these deaths we lowered our threshold for giving preoperative medical treatment such as ketoconazole or metyrapone in potential high-risk cases, particularly in those patients presenting with more severe clinical features at diagnosis. Preoperative medical treatment improves the quality of the tissues and increases the patient’s physiological reserve in preparation for surgery.14 In the ERCUSYN study, patients with severe clinical features who were treated preoperatively experienced comparable outcomes to those patients with milder features who were not treated with medical treatment before surgery. This justifies our approach to treat the more severe cases medically in the first instance. Nevertheless, preoperative medical treatment may confound the interpretation of early postoperative serum cortisol levels so close monitoring of these patients is required in the first few months following surgery.14 Since this change in practice, no deaths have occurred in patients undergoing surgery for CD at our unit.

Limitations

CD is a rare disease, and this study offers one of the larger modern series with practical illustrations of multidisciplinary practice at a tertiary pituitary center. Despite its size, this study did confirm that patients who achieved remission at 3 months were more likely to be in remission at the last follow-up. Patient and tumor characteristics were also important factors to consider. This study is nonetheless limited by lack of data on residual tumors found in postoperative MRIs. As such, we were unable to investigate further on the subgroup of patients without biochemical remission who had residual tumors. Furthermore, we do not fully know the proportion of MRI-negative patients who harbored an adenoma on histopathology, which may have skewed our findings. Further multi-institutional research is required to determine if patients with moderately lowered serum cortisol levels who receive early adjuvant radiotherapy have improved long-term clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Despite good initial remission rates following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery, this study demonstrated significant recurrence of CD. Nevertheless, patients who achieved initial biochemical remission (serum cortisol <50 nmol/L [1.8 μg/dL]) at 3 months were significantly more likely to achieve long-term biochemical remission. Selected patients with moderately lowered serum cortisol (serum cortisol 50–150 nmol/L [1.8–5.4 μg/dL]) responded well to early adjuvant radiotherapy but further research is required to determine their long-term clinical outcomes.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jonathan Shapey: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Keng Siang Lee: Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Vanitha Karunakaran: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. Mohamed Okasha: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Proma Dey: Data curation. Sabina Pate: Data curation. Mariusz T. Grzeda: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Jackie Gilbert: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Paul V. Carroll: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Benjamin Whitelaw: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Konstantinos Barkas: Data

curation, Writing – review & editing. Eleni Maratos: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Sinan Barazi: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Simon Aylwin: Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Nick WM. Thomas: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

References

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Next Page »