From Knee Pain Consultation to Pituitary Surgery: The Challenge of Cushing Disease Diagnosis

Abstract

Cushing syndrome (CS) is a rare endocrinological disorder resulting from chronic exposure to excessive cortisol. The term Cushing disease is used specifically when this is caused by excessive secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by a pituitary tumor, usually an adenoma. This disease is associated with a poor prognosis, and if left untreated, it has an estimated 5-year survival rate of 50%. We present the case of a 66-year-old female patient who received a referral to endocrinology for an evaluation of obesity due to right knee arthropathy. Taking into consideration her age, she was screened for osteoporosis, with results that showed diminished bone density. Considering this, combined with other clinical features of the patient, suspicion turned toward hypercortisolism. Laboratory findings suggested that the CS was ACTH-dependent and originated in the pituitary gland. After a second look at the magnetic resonance imaging results, a 4-mm lesion was identified on the pituitary gland, prompting a transsphenoidal resection of the pituitary adenoma.

Introduction

Chronic excessive exposure to glucocorticoids leads to the diverse clinical manifestations of Cushing syndrome (CS), which has an annual incidence ranging from 1.8 to 3.2 cases per million individuals [1]. The syndrome’s signs and symptoms are not pathognomonic, and some of its primary manifestations, such as obesity, hypertension, and glucose metabolism alterations, are prevalent in the general population [2], making diagnosis challenging. Endogenous CS falls into 2 categories: adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent (80%-85% of cases), mostly due to a pituitary adenoma, or ACTH-independent (15%-20% of cases), typically caused by adrenal adenomas or hyperplasia [3]. Cushing disease (CD) represents a specific form of CS, characterized by the presence of an ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor [1]. Untreated CD is associated with high morbidity and mortality compared to the general population [1], with a 50% survival rate at 5 years [2]. However, surgical removal of a pituitary adenoma can result in complete remission, with mortality rates similar to those of the general population [2]. This article aims to highlight the challenges of suspecting and diagnosing CD and to discuss the current management options for this rare condition.

Case Presentation

A 66-year-old woman received a referral to endocrinology for an evaluation of obesity due to right knee arthropathy. During physical examination, she exhibited a body mass index of 34.3 kg/m2, blood pressure of 180/100, a history of non-insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes mellitus with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.9% (nondiabetic: < 5.7%; prediabetic: 5.7% to 6.4%; diabetic: ≥ 6.5%) and hypertension. Additionally, the patient complained of proximal weakness in all 4 limbs.

Diagnostic Assessment

Upon admission, densitometry revealed osteoporosis with T scores of −2.7 in the lumbar spine and −2.8 in the femoral neck. Hypercortisolism was suspected due to concomitant arterial hypertension, central obesity, muscle weakness, and osteoporosis. Physical examination did not reveal characteristic signs of hypercortisolism, such as skin bruises, flushing, or reddish-purple striae. Late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) screening yielded a value of 8.98 nmol/L (0.3255 mcg/dL) (reference value [RV] 0.8-2.7 nmol/L [0.029-0.101 mcg/dL]) and ACTH of 38.1 pg/mL (8.4 pmol/L) (RV 2-11 pmol/L [9-52 pg/mL]). A low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) was performed (cutoff value 1.8 mcg/dL [49 nmol/L]), with cortisol levels of 7.98 mcg/dL (220 nmol/L) at 24 hours and 20.31 mcg/dL (560 nmol/L) at 48 hours. Subsequently, a high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (HDDST) was conducted using a dose of 2 mg every 6 hours for 2 days, for a total dose of 16 mg, revealing cortisol levels of 0.0220 nmol/L (0.08 ng/mL) at 24 hours and 0.0560 nmol/L (0.0203 ng/mL) at 48 hours, alongside 24-hour urine cortisol of 0.8745 nmol/L (0.317 ng/mL) (RV 30-145 nmol/24 hours [approximately 11-53 μg/24 hours]) [4].

These findings indicated the presence of endogenous ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism of pituitary origin. Consequently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was requested, but the results showed no abnormalities. Considering ectopic ACTH production often occurs in the lung, a high-resolution chest computed tomography scan was performed, revealing no lesions.

Treatment

Upon reassessment, the MRI revealed a 4-mm adenoma, prompting the decision to proceed with transsphenoidal resection of the pituitary adenoma.

Outcome and Follow-Up

The histological analysis revealed positive staining for CAM5.2, chromogranin, synaptophysin, and ACTH, with Ki67 staining at 1%. At the 1-month follow-up assessment, ACTH levels were 3.8 pmol/L (17.2 pg/mL) and morning cortisol was 115.8621 nmol/L (4.2 mcg/dL) (RV 5-25 mcg/dL or 140-690 nmol/L). Somatomedin C was measured at 85 ng/mL (RV 70-267 ng/mL) and prolactin at 3.5 ng/mL (RV 4-25 ng/mL). At the 1-year follow-up, the patient exhibited a satisfactory postoperative recovery. However, she developed diabetes insipidus and secondary hypothyroidism. Arterial hypertension persisted. Recent laboratory results indicated a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 5.4%. Medications at the time of follow-up included prednisolone 5 milligrams a day, desmopressin 60 to 120 micrograms every 12 hours, losartan potassium 50 milligrams every 12 hours, and levothyroxine 88 micrograms a day.

Discussion

CD is associated with high mortality, primarily attributable to cardiovascular outcomes and comorbidities such as metabolic and skeletal disorders, infections, and psychiatric disorders [1]. The low incidence of CD in the context of the high prevalence of chronic noncommunicable diseases makes early diagnosis a challenge [2]. This case is relevant for reviewing the diagnostic approach process and highlighting the impact of the availability bias, which tends to prioritize more common diagnoses over rare diseases. Despite the absence of typical symptoms, a timely diagnosis was achieved.

Once exogenous CS is ruled out, laboratory testing must focus on detecting endogenous hypercortisolism to prevent misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment [5]. Screening methods include 24-hour urinary free cortisol (UFC) for total cortisol load, while circadian rhythm and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function may be evaluated using midnight serum cortisol and LNSC [5]. An early hallmark of endogenous CS is the disruption of physiological circadian cortisol patterns, characterized by a constant cortisol level throughout the day or no significant decrease [2]. Measuring LNSC has proven to be useful in identifying these patients. The LNSC performed on the patient yielded a high result.

To assess HPA axis suppressibility, tests such as the overnight and the standard 2-day LDDST [5] use dexamethasone, a potent synthetic corticosteroid with high glucocorticoid receptor affinity and prolonged action, with minimal interference with cortisol measurement [6]. In a normal HPA axis, cortisol exerts negative feedback, inhibiting the secretion of corticotropin-releasing-hormone (CRH) and ACTH. Exogenous corticosteroids suppress CRH and ACTH secretion, resulting in decreased synthesis and secretion of cortisol. In pathological hypercortisolism, the HPA axis becomes partially or entirely resistant to feedback inhibition by exogenous steroids [56]. The LDDST involves the administration of 0.5 mg of dexamethasone orally every 6 hours for 2 days, with a total dose of 4 mg. A blood sample is drawn 6 hours after the last administered dose [6]. Following the LDDST, the patient did not demonstrate suppression of endogenous corticosteroid production.

After diagnosing CS, the next step in the diagnostic pathway involves categorizing it as ACTH-independent vs ACTH-dependent. ACTH-independent cases exhibit low or undetectable ACTH levels, pointing to adrenal origin. The underlying principle is that excess ACTH production in CD can be partially or completely suppressed by high doses of dexamethasone, a response not observed in ectopic tumors [6]. In this case, the patient presented with an ACTH of 38.1 pg/mL (8.4 pmol/L), indicative of ACTH-dependent CD.

Traditionally, measuring cortisol levels and conducting pituitary imaging are standard practices for diagnosis. Recent advances propose alternative diagnostic methods such as positron emission tomography (PET) scans and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) tests [7]. PET scans, utilizing radioactive tracers, offer a view of metabolic activity in the adrenal glands and pituitary region, aiding in the identification of abnormalities associated with CD. Unfortunately, the availability of the aforementioned tests in the country is limited.

Once ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism is confirmed, identifying the source becomes crucial. A HDDST is instrumental in distinguishing between a pituitary and an ectopic source of ACTH overproduction [26]. The HDDST involves administering 8 mg of dexamethasone either overnight or as a 2-day test. In this case, the patient received 2 mg of dexamethasone orally every 6 hours for 2 days, totaling a dose of 16 mg. Simultaneously, a urine sample for UFC is collected during dexamethasone administration. The HDDST suppressed endogenous cortisol production in the patient, suggesting a pituitary origin.

In ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism, CD is the predominant cause, followed by ectopic ACTH syndrome and, less frequently, an ectopic CRH-secreting tumor [35]. With the pretest probability for pituitary origin exceeding 80%, the next diagnostic step is typically an MRI of the pituitary region. However, the visualization of microadenomas on MRI ranges from 50% to 70%, requiring further testing if results are negative or inconclusive [5]. Initial testing of our patient revealed no pituitary lesions. Following a pituitary location, ACTH-secreting tumors may be found in the lungs. Thus, a high-resolution chest computed tomography scan was performed, which yielded negative findings. Healthcare professionals must keep these detection rates in mind. In instances of high clinical suspicion, repeating or reassessing tests and imaging may be warranted [3], as in our case, ultimately leading to the discovery of a 4-mm pituitary adenoma.

It is fundamental to mention that the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline on Treatment of CS recommends that, when possible, all patients presenting with ACTH-dependent CS and lacking an evident causal neoplasm should be directed to an experienced center capable of conducting inferior petrosal sinus sampling to differentiate between pituitary and nonpituitary or ectopic cause [8]. However, in this instance, such a referral was regrettably hindered by logistical constraints.

Regarding patient outcomes and monitoring in CD, there is no consensus on defining remission criteria following tumor resection. Prolonged hypercortisolism results in suppression of corticotropes, resulting in low levels of ACTH and cortisol after surgical intervention. Typically, remission is identified by morning serum cortisol values below 5 µg/dL (138 nmol/L) or UFC levels between 28 and 56 nmol/d (10-20 µg/d) within 7 days after surgical intervention. In our case, the patient’s morning serum cortisol was 115.8621 nmol/L (4.2 µg/dL), indicating remission. Remission rates in adults are reported at 73% to 76% in selectively resected microadenomas and at 43% in macroadenomas [8], highlighting the need for regular follow-up visits to detect recurrence.

Following the surgery, the patient experienced diabetes insipidus, a relatively common postoperative occurrence, albeit usually transient [8]. It is recommended to monitor serum sodium levels during the first 5 to 14 days postsurgery for early detection and management. Additionally, pituitary deficiencies may manifest following surgery. In this patient, prolactin levels were compromised, potentially impacting sexual response. However, postoperative somatomedin levels were normal, and gonadotropins were not measured due to the patient’s age group, as no additional clinical decisions were anticipated based on those results. Secondary hypothyroidism was diagnosed postoperatively.

Moving forward, it is important to emphasize certain clinical signs and symptoms for diagnosing CD. The combination of low bone mineral density (Likelihood Ratio [LR] +21.33), central obesity (LR +3.10), and arterial hypertension (LR + 2.29) [9] has a higher positive LR than some symptoms considered “characteristic,” such as reddish-purple striae, plethora, proximal muscle weakness, and unexplained bruising [210]. It is essential to give relevance to the signs the patient may present, emphasizing signs that have been proven to have an increased odds ratio (OR) such as osteoporosis (OR 3.8), myopathies (OR 6.0), metabolic syndrome (OR 2.7) and adrenal adenoma (OR 2.4) [9‐11]. The simultaneous development and worsening of these conditions should raise suspicion for underlying issues. Understanding the evolving nature of CD signs highlights the importance of vigilance during medical examinations, prioritizing the diagnostic focus, and enabling prompt initiation of treatment.

Recognizing the overlap of certain clinical features in CS is fundamental to achieving a timely diagnosis.

Learning Points

  • CS diagnosis is challenging due to the absence of pathognomonic signs and symptoms and the overlap of features present in many pathologies, such as metabolic syndrome.
  • Early detection of CS is crucial, given its association with high morbidity and mortality resulting from chronic exposure to glucocorticoids.
  • Recognizing the combination of low bone mineral density, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes as valuable clinical indicators is key in identifying CS.
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to achieve a comprehensive diagnostic approach.

Acknowledgments

We extend our gratitude to Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Bogotá for providing essential resources and facilities that contributed to the successful completion of this case report. Special acknowledgment is reserved for the anonymous reviewers, whose insightful feedback significantly enhanced the quality of this manuscript during the peer-review process. Their contributions are sincerely appreciated.

Contributors

All authors made individual contributions to authorship. A.B.O. was involved in the diagnosis and management of this patient. M.A.G., J.M.H., and A.B.O. were involved in manuscript drafting and editing. All authors reviewed and approved the final draft.

Funding

This research received no public or commercial funding.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to the current study.

Informed Patient Consent for Publication

Signed informed consent could not be obtained from the patient or a proxy but has been approved by the treating institution.

Data Availability Statement

Restrictions apply to the availability of some or all data generated or analyzed during this study to preserve patient confidentiality or because they were used under license. The corresponding author will on request detail the restrictions and any conditions under which access to some data may be provided.

References

1

Hakami
OA

,

Ahmed
S

,

Karavitaki
N

.

Epidemiology and mortality of Cushing’s syndrome

.

Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab

.

2021

;

35

(

1

):

101521

.

2

Nieman
LK

,

Biller
BMK

,

Findling
JW

, et al.

The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline

.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

.

2008

;

93

(

5

):

1526

1540

.

3

Gutiérrez Restrepo
J

,

Latorre Sierra
G

,

Campuzano Maya
G

.

Síndrome de cushing

.

Med Lab

.

2009

;

15

:

411

430

.

4

Petersenn
S

,

Newell-Price
J

,

Findling
JW

, et al.

High variability in baseline urinary free cortisol values in patients with Cushing’s disease

.

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)

.

2014

;

80

(

2

):

261

269

.

5

Lila
AR

,

Sarathi
V

,

Jagtap
VS

,

Bandgar
T

,

Menon
P

,

Shah
NS

.

Cushing’s syndrome: stepwise approach to diagnosis

.

Indian J Endocrinol Metab

.

2011

;

15

(

Suppl4

):

S317

S321

.

6

Dogra
P

,

Vijayashankar
NP

.

Dexamethasone suppression test. In: StatPearls StatPearls Publishing; 2024

. Accessed January 29, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542317/

7

Müller
OA

,

Dörr
HG

,

Hagen
B

,

Stalla
GK

,

von Werder
K

.

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF)-stimulation test in normal controls and patients with disturbances of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis

.

Klin Wochenschr

.

1982

;

60

(

24

):

1485

1491

.

8

Nieman
LK

,

Biller
BMK

,

Findling
JW

, et al.

Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline

.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

.

2015

;

100

(

8

):

2807

2831

.

9

Aron
DC

.

Cushing’s syndrome: why is diagnosis so difficult?
Rev Endocr Metab Disord

.

2010

;

11

(

2

):

105

116

.

10

Braun
LT

,

Vogel
F

,

Zopp
S

, et al.

Whom should we screen for cushing syndrome? the Endocrine Society practice guideline recommendations 2008 revisited

.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

.

2022

;

107

(

9

):

e3723

e3730

.

11

Schneider
HJ

,

Dimopoulou
C

,

Stalla
GK

,

Reincke
M

,

Schopohl
J

.

Discriminatory value of signs and symptoms in Cushing’s syndrome revisited: what has changed in 30 years?
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)

.

2013

;

78

(

1

):

153

154

.

Abbreviations

 

  • ACTH

    adrenocorticotropic hormone

  • CD

    Cushing disease

  • CRH

    corticotropin-releasing hormone

  • CS

    Cushing syndrome

  • HDDST

    high-dose dexamethasone suppression test

  • HPA

    hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal

  • LDDST

    low-dose dexamethasone suppression test

  • LNSC

    late-night salivary cortisol

  • MRI

    magnetic resonance imaging

  • OR

    odds ratio

  • RV

    reference value

  • UFC

    urinary free cortisol

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Day 15, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Today’s Cushing’s Awareness Challenge post is about kidney cancer (renal cell carcinoma). You might wonder how in the world this is related to Cushing’s. I think it is, either directly or indirectly.

I alluded to this a couple days ago when I said:

I finally started the Growth Hormone December 7, 2004.
Was the hassle and 3 year wait worth it?
Stay tuned for tomorrow, April 15, 2016 when all will be revealed.

So, as I said, I started Growth Hormone for my panhypopituitarism on December 7, 2004.  I took it for a while but never really felt any better, no more energy, no weight loss.  Sigh.

April 14 2006 I went back to the endo and found out that the arginine test that was done in 2004 was done incorrectly. The directions were written unclearly and the test run incorrectly, not just for me but for everyone who had this test done there for a couple years. My endo discovered this when he was writing up a research paper and went to the lab to check on something.

So, I went off GH again for 2 weeks, then was retested. The “good news” was that the arginine test is only 90 minutes now instead of 3 hours.

Wow, what a nightmare my arginine retest started! I went back for that Thursday, April 27, 2006. Although the test was shorter, I got back to my hotel and just slept and slept. I was so glad that I hadn’t decided to go right home after the test.

Friday I felt fine and drove back home, no problem. I picked up my husband for a biopsy he was having and took him to an outpatient surgical center. While I was there waiting for the biopsy to be completed, I started noticing blood in my urine and major abdominal cramps.

There were signs all over that no cellphones were allowed so I sat in the restroom (I had to be in there a lot, anyway!) and I left messages for several of my doctors on what I should do. It was Friday afternoon and most of them were gone 😦  I finally decided to see my PCP after I got my husband home.

When Tom was done with his testing, his doctor took one look at me and asked if I wanted an ambulance. I said no, that I thought I could make it to the emergency room ok – Tom couldn’t drive because of the anaesthetic they had given him. I barely made it to the ER and left the car with Tom to park. Tom’s doctor followed us to the ER and instantly became my new doctor.

They took me in pretty fast since I was in so much pain, and had the blood in my urine. At first, they thought it was a kidney stone. After a CT scan, my new doctor said that, yes, I had a kidney stone but it wasn’t the worst of my problems, that I had kidney cancer. Wow, what a surprise that was! I was admitted to that hospital, had more CT scans, MRIs, bone scans, they looked everywhere.

My new “instant doctor” felt that he wasn’t up to the challenge of my surgery, so he called in someone else.  My next new “instant doctor” came to see me in the ER in the middle of the night.  He patted my hand, like a loving grandfather might and said “At least you won’t have to do chemotherapy”.  And I felt so reassured.

It wasn’t until later, much after my surgery, that I found out that there was no chemo yet that worked for my cancer.  I was so thankful for the way he told me.  I would have really freaked out if he’d said that nothing they had was strong enough!

My open radical nephrectomy was May 9, 2006 in another hospital from the one where the initial diagnosis was made. My surgeon felt that he needed a specialist from that hospital because he believed preop that my tumor had invaded into the vena cava because of its appearance on the various scans. Luckily, that was not the case.

My entire left kidney and the encapsulated cancer (10 pounds worth!) were removed, along with my left adrenal gland and some lymph nodes. Although the cancer (renal cell carcinoma AKA RCC) was very close to hemorrhaging, the surgeon believed he got it all.

He said I was so lucky. If the surgery had been delayed any longer, the outcome would have been much different. I will be repeating the CT scans every 3 months, just to be sure that there is no cancer hiding anywhere. As it turns out, I can never say I’m cured, just NED (no evidence of disease). This thing can recur at any time, anywhere in my body.

I credit the arginine re-test with somehow aggravating my kidneys and revealing this cancer. Before the test, I had no clue that there was any problem. The arginine test showed that my IGF is still low but due to the kidney cancer I couldn’t take my growth hormone for another 5 years – so the test was useless anyway, except to hasten this newest diagnosis.

So… either Growth Hormone helped my cancer grow or testing for it revealed a cancer I might not have learned about until later.

My five years are up now.  When I was 10 years free of this cancer my kidney surgeon *thought* it would be ok to try the growth hormone again.  I was a little leery about this, especially where I didn’t notice that much improvement.

What to do?

BTW, I decided to…

Day 13, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

UVA 2004
Cushing’s Conventions have always been special times for me – we learn a lot, get to meet other Cushies, even get referrals to endos!

As early as 2001 (or before) my pituitary function was dropping.  My former endo tested annually but did nothing to help me with the symptoms.

In the fall of 2002 my endo refused to discuss my fatigue or anything at all with me until I lost 10 pounds. He said I wasn’t worth treating in my overweight condition and that I was setting myself up for a heart attack. He gave me 3 months to lose this weight. Those 3 months included Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years.  Needless to say, I left his office in tears, again.

Fast forward 2 years to 2004.  I had tried for a while to get my records from this endo. He wouldn’t send them, even at doctors’ or my requests.

I wanted to go see Dr. Vance at UVa but I had no records so she wouldn’t see me until I could get them.

Finally, my husband went to the former endo’s office and threatened him with a court order. The office manager managed to come up with about 13 pages of records. For going to him from 1986 to 2001 including weeks and weeks at NIH and pituitary surgery, that didn’t seem like enough records to me.

In April of 2004, many of us from the message boards went to the UVa Pituitary Days Convention. That’s where the picture above comes in.  Other pictures from that convention are here.

By chance, we met a wonderful woman named Barbara Craven. She sat at our table for lunch on the last day and, after we learned that she was a dietitian who had had Cushing’s, one of us jokingly asked her if she’d do a guest chat for us. I didn’t follow through on this until she emailed me later. In the email, she asked how I was doing. Usually I say “fine” or “ok” but for some reason, I told her exactly how awful I was feeling.

Barbara emailed me back and said I should see a doctor at Johns Hopkins. I said I didn’t think I could get a recommendation to there, so SHE referred me. The doctor got right back to me, set up an appointment. Between his vacation and mine, that first appointment turned out to be Tuesday, Sept 14, 2004.

Just getting through the maze at Johns Hopkins was amazing. They have the whole system down to a science, moving from one place to another to sign in, then go here, then window 6, then… But it was very efficient.

My new doctor was wonderful. Understanding, knowledgeable. He never once said that I was “too fat” or “depressed” or that all this was my own fault. I feel so validated, finally.

He looked through my records, especially at my 2 previous Insulin Tolerance Tests (ITT). From those, he determined that my growth hormone has been low since at least August 2001 and I’ve been adrenal insufficient since at least Fall, 1999 – possibly as much as 17 years! I was amazed to hear all this, and astounded that my former endo not only didn’t tell me any of this, he did nothing. He had known both of these things – they were in the past records that I took with me. Perhaps that was why he had been so reluctant to share copies of those records. He had given me Cortef in the fall of 1999 to take just in case I had “stress” and that was it.

The new endo took a lot of blood (no urine!) for cortisol and thyroid stuff. I went back on Sept. 28, 2004 for arginine, cortrosyn and IGF testing.

He said that I would end up on daily cortisone – a “sprinkling” – and some form of GH, based on the testing the 28th.

For those who are interested, my new endo is Roberto Salvatori, M.D.
Assistant Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins

Medical School: Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
Residency: Montefiore Medical Center
Fellowship: Cornell University, Johns Hopkins University
Board Certification: Endocrinology and Metabolism, Internal Medicine

Clinical Interests: Neuroendocrinology, pituitary disorders, adrenal disorders

Research Interests: Control of growth hormone secretion, genetic causes of growth hormone deficiency, consequences of growth hormone deficiency.

Although I have this wonderful doctor, a specialist in growth hormone deficiency at Johns Hopkins, in November, 2004, my insurance company saw fit to over-ride his opinions and his test results based on my past pharmaceutical history! Hello??? How could I have a history of taking GH when I’ve never taken it before?

Of course, I found out late on a Friday afternoon. By then it was too late to call my case worker at the drug company, so we had to appeal on Monday. My local insurance person also worked on an appeal, but the whole thing was  just another long ordeal of finding paperwork, calling people, FedExing stuff, too much work when I just wanted to start feeling better by Thanksgiving.

As it turned out the insurance company rejected the brand of hGH that was prescribed for me. They gave me the ok for a growth hormone was just FDA-approved for adults on 11/4/04. The day this medication was approved for adults was the day after my insurance said that’s what is preferred for me. In the past, this form of hGH was only approved for children with height issues. Was I going to be a ginuea pig again?

The new GH company assigned a rep for me, submitted info to pharmacy, and waited for insurance approval, again.

I finally started the Growth Hormone December 7, 2004.

Was the hassle and 3 year wait worth it?

Stay tuned for April 15, 2016 when all will be revealed.

Read

Read Dr. Barbara Craven’s Guest Chat, October 27, 2004

Thanks for reading 🙂

MaryO

Related Factors of Delirium After Transsphenoidal Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection

Highlights

  • Aim to identify independent risk factors for postoperative delirium after pituitary adenoma surgery.
  • Select matched subjects by Propensity Score Matching to reduce potential biases caused by variables.
  • Enhance preoperative communication to minimize the occurrence of delirium, for patients at high risk of postoperative delirium.
  • Minimize surgery duration and general anesthesia, optimize perioperative sedation regimen.
  • Reducing unnecessary or excessive protective physical restraints.

Abstract

Objectives

The primary aim of this study is to explore the factors associated with delirium incidence in postoperative patients who have undergone endoscopic transsphenoidal approach surgery for pituitary adenoma.

Methods

The study population included patients admitted to Tianjin Huanhu Hospital’s Skull Base Endoscopy Center from January to December 2022, selected through a retrospective cohort study design. The presence of perioperative delirium was evaluated using the 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) scale, and the final diagnosis of delirium was determined by clinicians. Statistical analysis included Propensity Score Matching (PSM), χ2 Test, and Binary Logistic Regression.

Results

A total of 213 patients were included in this study, and the incidence of delirium was found to be 29.58 % (63/213). Among them, 126 patients were selected using PSM (delirium:non-delirium = 1:1), ensuring age, gender, and pathology were matched. According to the results of univariate analysis conducted on multiple variables, The binary logistic regression indicated that a history of alcoholism (OR = 6.89, [1.60–29.68], P = 0.010), preoperative optic nerve compression symptoms (OR = 4.30, [1.46–12.65], P = 0.008), operation time ≥3 h (OR = 5.50, [2.01–15.06], P = 0.001), benzodiazepines for sedation (OR = 3.94, [1.40–11.13], P = 0.010), sleep disorder (OR = 3.86, [1.40–10.66], P = 0.009), and physical restraint (OR = 4.53, [1.64–12.53], P = 0.004) as independent risk factors for postoperative delirium following pituitary adenoma surgery.

Conclusions

For pituitary adenoma patients with a history of alcoholism and presenting symptoms of optic nerve compression, as well as an operation time ≥3 h, enhancing communication between healthcare providers and patients, improving perioperative sleep quality, and reducing physical restraint may help decrease the incidence of postoperative delirium.

Introduction

In clinical practice, patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the postoperative period after endoscopic transsphenoidal tumorectomy of pituitary adenoma often experience episodes of delirium. According to a recent retrospective analysis conducted at a single center, the incidence of postoperative delirium among these patients was found to be 10.34 % (n = 360) [1]. Delirium is a common complication following neurosurgery, characterized by acute distraction, confusion in thinking, sleep disorders, and cognitive decline. The incidence of delirium in admitted patients after neurosurgery has been reported to be 19 %, with a range of 12 % to 26 % depending on clinical features and the methods used for delirium assessment [2], [3], [4]. The incidence of postoperative delirium varied across different types of neurosurgical diseases, as reported in a meta-analysis [2]. Specifically, the incidences were 8.0 % for patients with neurological tumors, 20 % for those undergoing functional neurosurgery, 24.0 % for microvascular decompression patients, 19.0 % for traumatic brain injury patients, 42.0 % for neurovascular patients, and 17.0 % for the mixed population undergoing neurosurgery procedures. Furthermore, the incidence rates of delirium in intensive care units (ICUs), general wards, or both combined were found to be 24.0 %, 17 %, and 18 %, respectively.

The aforementioned issue not only leads to prolonged hospital stays and increased healthcare costs, but also exerts a significant impact on patient consciousness and cognitive function. Therefore, early and accurate identification of delirium in post-neurosurgical patients is crucial. However, due to frequent co-occurrence with primary brain injury, related complications can also lead to cognitive impairment or even decreased levels of consciousness, posing challenges for timely and precise identification of delirium. Currently, the primary focus lies in the prevention of delirium within the neurosurgical ICU setting. Early identification and comprehensive pre-surgical assessment are positively significant measures for preventing postoperative delirium occurrence [5], [6]. In this study, a retrospective cohort design was employed to collect pertinent data and statistically analyze the incidence of delirium, as well as its associated influencing factors, among patients admitted to the neurosurgical ICU for pituitary adenoma treatment. And now it is reported as follows.

Section snippets

Patient selection

A retrospective cohort study design was employed to select 213 pituitary adenomas admitted to the Skull Base and Endoscopy Center of Tianjin Huanhu Hospital between January 2022 and December 2022 as the subjects for investigation, with a review of their medical records. The mean age was (50.03 ± 15.72) years, ranging from 20–79 years old (Fig. 1). Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their families, ensuring compliance with the requirements stated in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Inclusion criteria

a.

Propensity score matching

The present study enrolled a total of 213 patients with pituitary tumors, among whom 63 exhibited symptoms related to delirium while the remaining 150 did not. Consequently, the incidence rate of delirium was determined to be 29.58 % in this cohort of patients admitted to the intensive care unit following pituitary tumor surgery. The univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in age (≥65y old, 23.8 % vs. 23.3 %, P = 0.940) and gender (male, 49.2 % vs. 56.7 %, P = 0.318) between the

Background of perioperative delirium in transsphenoidal endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery

The pituitary gland is situated within the sella turcica and comprises two distinct components. The anterior pituitary, known as the adenohypophysis, functions as an endocrine organ responsible for secreting growth hormone, prolactin, adrenocorticotropic hormone, thyrotropin, follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. On the other hand, the posterior pituitary, referred to as the neurohypophysis, serves as a direct extension of the hypothalamus and acts as a storage site for

Conclusions

To enhance the evaluation of postoperative patients at risk of delirium, it is anticipated that optimizing doctor-nurse-patient communication and minimizing unnecessary and indiscriminate protective measures will mitigate the incidence of delirium following pituitary tumor surgery. This study is a single-center prospective study conducted at our institution, which has several inherent limitations. A large-scale multicenter prospective study is anticipated to further investigate the associated

Limitations

There are multiple factors that influence the occurrence of delirium following neurosurgery. This retrospective study solely focused on analyzing and comparing general patient data, medical history, and potential perioperative factors contributing to delirium, without considering any other known or unknown variables in this analysis. The pituitary gland functions as a neuroendocrine organ involved in the regulation of neuroendocrine processes. Changes in hormone levels following surgery for

Funding

All authors affirm that this study was conducted without any fund support from external organizations.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Shusheng Zhang: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Yanan Chen: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. Xiudong Wang: Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Jun Liu: Software, Formal analysis, Data curation. Yueda Chen: Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation. Guobin Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Talus Avascular Necrosis as a Rare Complication of Cushing’s Disease

Abstract

Avascular necrosis (AVN), also called osteonecrosis, stems from blood supply interruption to the bone and is often idiopathic. It has risk factors like trauma, alcohol, and corticosteroids. AVN in the talus (AVNT) is less common than in the femoral head. Most cases of talar osteonecrosis are associated with trauma, while a smaller proportion is linked to systemic conditions such as sickle cell disease or prolonged prednisone use. Glucocorticoids are a key nontraumatic cause. We report a middle-aged woman with Cushing’s syndrome symptoms, such as hypertension and moon face, since her youth. A few years ago, she experienced pain and swelling in her ankle, which was diagnosed as atraumatic AVNT and treated with hindfoot fusion. Years later, she was diagnosed with Cushing’s disease caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-producing pituitary adenoma in laboratory tests and imaging, which was resected in 2020. She experienced significant weight loss, and her Cushing’s syndrome symptoms were relieved after tumor resection. Mechanisms behind AVN in hypercortisolism involve fat cell hypertrophy, fat embolization, osteocyte apoptosis, and glucocorticoid-induced hypertension. Traditional X-rays may miss early AVN changes; MRI is preferred for early detection. Although there are some cases of femoral AVN caused by endogenous hypercortisolism in the literature, as far as we know, this is the first case of AVNT due to Cushing’s disease. AVNT treatment includes conservative approaches, hindfoot fusion, and core decompression. Cushing’s disease is a rare cause of AVNT, and a multidisciplinary approach aids in the rapid diagnosis of elusive symptoms.

Introduction

Avascular necrosis (AVN), also known as osteonecrosis, is a condition arising from the temporary interruption or permanent cessation of blood supply to a bone, leading to tissue necrosis or its demise. While AVN is frequently idiopathic, certain established risk factors are known including trauma, alcohol abuse, and the use of exogenous corticosteroids [1]. While not as prevalent as in the femoral head, AVN of the talus (AVNT) in the ankle presents a painful and disabling issue for patients and poses a challenging dilemma for orthopedic surgeons [2]. About 75% of cases of talar osteonecrosis stem from traumatic injuries, while approximately 25% of nontraumatic instances are typically associated with systemic conditions such as sickle cell disease or prolonged use of prednisone, which impede blood flow. [3]

The use of glucocorticoids is one of the most important non-traumatic causes of AVN. Nevertheless, there are some case reports where AVN in the femoral head is reported as a manifestation of endogenous hypercortisolism, particularly associated with Cushing’s syndrome [4-12].

In this article, we describe the case of a middle-aged woman who was diagnosed with idiopathic severe progressive AVNT for two years. She had retrogradely diagnosed masked symptoms of Cushing’s disease since her youth, but the diagnosis was confirmed after undergoing ankle arthrodesis.

Case Presentation

A 43-year-old woman visited our office in June 2018 with a complaint of severe pain and swelling in her left ankle, which had persisted for the past two years. She had hypertension since her youth and blurry vision since 2013 but had no other significant medical or family history. She was also diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) in 2015 when she lost her husband. She had no history of smoking, alcohol consumption, or addiction. She had not experienced any significant trauma during this period and sought consultations from various specialties, including neurology, psychology, internal medicine, nephrology, rheumatology, and orthopedics. She had received a platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection in the ankle, but it did not improve her symptoms. Despite undergoing various diagnostic workups, no precise diagnosis had been established.

Back in 2013, she remembers suddenly experiencing blurry vision in her right eye. This condition underwent a misdiagnosis, which almost led to a loss of vision. She had been struggling with her eye problems until her last visit, during which she received intravitreal bevacizumab injections. Additionally, she previously had iron deficiency anemia, which was treated with ferrous sulfate before 2018.

In our first visit, during the physical examination, the pain was localized in the ankle mortise with some posterolateral pain along the course of the peroneal tendons posterior to the fibula. Based on the physical examination and available ankle radiographs, we diagnosed AVNT. The patient subsequently underwent ankle arthroscopy through the standard anterior portals, the joint was cleaned, the synovium was shaved, and a small incision was conducted for peroneal assessment; this procedure revealed a subchondral collapse and extensive necrosis in the talus. Following the procedure, she experienced a partial improvement in her symptoms. However, six months later, she returned with a recurrence of symptoms (Figure 1). Upon further inquiry, she mentioned that her symptoms had recurred a month ago when she was dancing at a family party. Radiographs showed a stress fracture in her fibula and extensive AVNT. This diagnosis was confirmed through a CT scan, MRI, and bone scan (Figure 2).

Ankle-X-ray-six-months-after-arthroscopy
Figure 1: Ankle X-ray six months after arthroscopy

Pain had reduced for four months, then pain increased with activity and disabled her after a night of dancing. Subchondral fracture and fibular stress fracture are evident (A and B, respectively).

MRI,-CT-scan,-and-technetium-99m-(Tc-99m)-bone-scan
Figure 2: MRI, CT scan, and technetium-99m (Tc-99m) bone scan

Coronal MRI confirmed avascular necrosis of the talar dome with subchondral fracture (A and B, respectively). CT scan (C) and Tc-99 bone scan (D) images also revealed the pathologies.

In the second visit after arthroscopy, upon confirmation of a fibular stress fracture and significant subchondral collapse, and following a discussion of the next available options with the patient, the second procedure was performed as an ankle arthrodesis with an anterior approach. A 6 cm longitudinal incision was made anteriorly, and through the plane between the tibialis anterior and extensor hallucis longus, the ankle joint was accessed. Joint preparation was done with an osteotome, ensuring a bleeding surface on both sides. Then, manual compression with provisional pin fixation in the corrective position was performed. The fusion was planned at less than 5 degrees of valgus, 10 degrees of external rotation, and approximately 10 degrees of plantar flexion, suitable for the high-heeled shoes that she was using in her daily living activities. After confirming fluoroscopy in two planes, final 6.5 mm cannulated cancellous screws were used, and fixation was augmented with an anterior molded 4.5 mm narrow dynamic compression plate (DCP), according to our previously published anterior ankle fusion technique [13]. The foot was placed in a splint for 10 days, after which stitches were removed, and a cast was applied for four weeks. Then, walking with gradual, as-tolerated weight-bearing was initiated (Figure 3). Three months after surgery, she was pain-free, and by the sixth month, she could walk without any boot or brace, only using high-heeled shoes.

Post-operative-radiographies
Figure 3: Post-operative radiographies

Six months after the ankle surgery, a huge osteonecrosis and fibular stress fracture were managed with an acceptable, painless ankle fusion (not solid) despite the remaining necrosis (A and B, respectively). In 2024, four years after the tumor resection, complete healing of talus necrosis and solid fusion were achieved (C and D, respectively).

In 2020, two years after her ankle surgery, she was referred to an endocrinologist due to excessive weight gain and hirsutism. The biochemical assessment revealed the following: cortisol (8 AM) (chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA)) was 96 µg/dl (normal range: 4.82 – 19.5 µg/dl), and it was 22.1 µg/dl after overnight dexamethasone (normal range: < 1.8 µg/dl). Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) (CLIA) was 44.4 pg/ml (normal range: 7.2-63.3 pg/ml), and cortisol measured 5.7 µg/dl after the 48-hour low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (normal < 5 µg/dl). The results, along with symptoms (Table 1), are documented in the laboratory tests (Table 2). She was diagnosed with Cushing’s syndrome, which was subsequently confirmed as Cushing’s disease due to an ACTH-producing pituitary adenoma observed in the MRI and Brain CT (Figure 4).

Sign/symptom Severity
Weight Gain Severe
Hirsutism Severe
Hypertension Severe
Easy bruising Severe
Depression Severe
Moon face Moderate (masked with makeup)
Lethargy Moderate
Headache Moderate
Peripheral edema       _
Buffalo hump       _
Myopathy       _
Acne       _
Purple striae       _
Table 1: Cushing’s disease symptoms and signs

The hyphens in the table indicate that the patient does not have those symptoms or signs.

Laboratory test Result Reference range
Cortisol (8 AM) (CLIA) 96 µg/dl 4.82-19.5 µg/dl
Cortisol (8 AM) (after overnight dexamethasone) (CLIA) 22.1 µg/dl <1.8 µg/dl
ACTH (CLIA) 44.4 pg/ml 7.2-63.3 pg/ml
Cortisol after 48 hours of LDDST (CLIA) 5.7 µg/dl < 5 µg/dl
Table 2: Laboratory tests

CLIA: chemiluminescence immunoassay; ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone; LDDST: low-dose dexamethasone suppression test

Brain-MRI
Figure 4: Brain MRI

Finally, a pituitary adenoma was diagnosed using a Brain MRI as the cause of Cushing’s disease symptoms (A and B).

Finally, she underwent a tumor resection and had a dramatic response after treatment (30 kg weight loss). She revealed that she had Cushing’s syndrome symptoms since she was young. These symptoms included a puffy face, which she covered with makeup, high blood pressure, and hirsutism. In January 2024, four years after her brain surgery, during our last visit, her symptoms had significantly improved. She reported no problems with her ankle, and talus necrosis was completely healed, with a solid fusion achieved in radiographs (Figure 3).

Discussion

As far as we are aware, this case presentation represents the first instance of AVNT attributed to Cushing’s disease in the existing literature. Nevertheless, some individuals with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome have been reported to experience AVN of the femoral head [4-12].

Cushing’s syndrome is an uncommon endocrine condition marked by manifestations of hypercortisolism. The predominant cause is often an adenoma in the anterior pituitary gland that produces ACTH, referred to as Cushing’s disease [14]. The presentation of Cushing’s syndrome can vary significantly in both adults and children, influenced by the extent and duration of hypercortisolemia. However, the typical signs and symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome are widely known [15]. Although some individuals may perceive these alterations as normal and physiological, the disease can go unnoticed for an extended period, as in our case, in which it remained undiagnosed for more than 20 years.

However, it is known that steroid use is a significant contributing factor to the occurrence of bone osteonecrosis, accounting for up to 40% of non-traumatic instances of AVN [16]. The mechanisms leading to AVN due to either endogenous hypercortisolism or excess exogenous glucocorticoids are not completely understood. There are just some hypotheses that suggest that the hypertrophy of fat cells, embolization of fat, and osteocytes’ apoptosis result in impaired blood flow in the bone, ultimately causing ischemic tissue necrosis [17]. An alternative proposed theory suggests that elevated levels of glucocorticoids may cause insulin resistance and subsequently contribute to AVN [18].

Traditional X-rays often fail to detect the initial changes of AVN (as observed in our case). MRI stands as the preferred method for identifying AVN in its early phases, providing an opportunity for timely therapeutic interventions [19,20].

In an analysis of 321 cases of AVNT, the predominant treatment modalities included conservative therapies (n = 104), hindfoot fusion (n = 62), and core decompression (n = 85) [21]. These approaches reflect the primary methods employed in contemporary clinical practice for addressing AVNT.

After all, we confirmed the AVNT diagnosis using MRI and bone scan and managed it with hindfoot fusion. Subsequently, the underlying issue, endogenous hypercortisolism due to an ACTH-producing pituitary adenoma, was identified and treated through resection of the tumor (Figure 5).

Case-report-timeline
Figure 5: Case report timeline

* Avascular necrosis in the talus

Conclusions

Cushing’s syndrome is a rare endocrine disorder characterized by excessive cortisol levels, commonly caused by an ACTH-producing adenoma in the pituitary gland, known as Cushing’s disease. Cushing’s disease may be one of the rare causes of AVNT. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first instance of AVNT due to Cushing’s disease described in the literature. Since atraumatic AVNT is rare in itself, a multidisciplinary approach can lead us to a more rapid and proper diagnosis, as each symptom may be masked or considered rare within its subspecialty field.

References

  1. Chang CC, Greenspan A, Gershwin ME: Osteonecrosis: current perspectives on pathogenesis and treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1993, 23:47-69. 10.1016/s0049-0172(05)80026-5
  2. Zhang H, Fletcher AN, Scott DJ, Nunley J: Avascular osteonecrosis of the talus: current treatment strategies. Foot Ankle Int. 2022, 43:291-302. 10.1177/10711007211051013
  3. Parekh SG, Kadakia RJ: Avascular necrosis of the talus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021, 29:e267-78. 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00418
  4. Belmahi N, Boujraf S, Larwanou MM, El Ouahabi H: Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: an exceptional complication of Cushing’s disease. Ann Afr Med. 2018, 17:225-7. 10.4103/aam.aam_75_17
  5. Salazar D, Esteves C, Ferreira MJ, Pedro J, Pimenta T, Portugal R, Carvalho 😧 Avascular femoral necrosis as part of Cushing syndrome presentation: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2021, 15:287. 10.1186/s13256-021-02882-7
  6. Alaya Z, Braham M, Bouajina E: Aseptic femur head necrosis revealing Cushing’s disease: a rare presentation. J Clin Surg Res. 2020, 1:10.31579/2768-2757/002
  7. Phillips KA, Nance EP Jr, Rodriguez RM, Kaye JJ: Avascular necrosis of bone: a manifestation of Cushing’s disease. South Med J. 1986, 79:825-9. 10.1097/00007611-198607000-00011
  8. Koch CA, Tsigos C, Patronas NJ, Papanicolaou DA: Cushing’s disease presenting with avascular necrosis of the hip: an orthopedic emergency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999, 84:3010-2. 10.1210/jcem.84.9.5992
  9. Modroño N, Torán CE, Pavón I, Benza ME, Guijarro G, Navea 😄 Cushinǵs syndrome and avascular hip necrosis: presentation of two patients [Article in Spanish]. Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2014, 214:e93-6. 10.1016/j.rce.2014.05.003
  10. Camporro F, Bulacio E, Gutiérrez Magaldi I: Bilateral osteonecrosis of the hip secondary to endogenous Cushing’s syndrome due to a recently-diagnosed carcinoid tumour of the lung [Article in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc). 2016, 147:228. 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.03.042
  11. Ha JS, Cho HM, Lee HJ, Kim SD: Bilateral avascular necrosis of the femoral head in a patient with asymptomatic adrenal incidentaloma. Hip Pelvis. 2019, 31:120-3. 10.5371/hp.2019.31.2.120
  12. Anand A, Jha CK, Singh PK, Sinha U, Ganesh A, Bhadani PP: Avascular necrosis of femur as a complication of Cushing’s syndrome due to adrenocortical carcinoma. Am Surg. 2023, 89:2701-4. 10.1177/00031348221129510
  13. Gharehdaghi M, Rahimi H, Mousavian A: Anterior ankle arthrodesis with molded plate: technique and outcomes. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2014, 2:203-9.
  14. Lindholm J, Juul S, Jørgensen JO, et al.: Incidence and late prognosis of cushing’s syndrome: a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86:117-23. 10.1210/jcem.86.1.7093
  15. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, Montori VM: The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 93:1526-40. 10.1210/jc.2008-0125
  16. Konarski W, Poboży T, Konarska K, Śliwczyński A, Kotela I, Hordowicz M, Krakowiak J: Osteonecrosis related to steroid and alcohol use-an update on pathogenesis. Healthcare (Basel). 2023, 11:1846. 10.3390/healthcare11131846
  17. Chan KL, Mok CC: Glucocorticoid-induced avascular bone necrosis: diagnosis and management. Open Orthop J. 2012, 6:449-57. 10.2174/1874325001206010449
  18. Hartmann K, Koenen M, Schauer S, Wittig-Blaich S, Ahmad M, Baschant U, Tuckermann JP: Molecular actions of glucocorticoids in cartilage and bone during health, disease, and steroid therapy. Physiol Rev. 2016, 96:409-47. 10.1152/physrev.00011.2015
  19. Kaste SC, Karimova EJ, Neel MD: Osteonecrosis in children after therapy for malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011, 196:1011-8. 10.2214/AJR.10.6073
  20. Pierce TP, Jauregui JJ, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Mont MA: Imaging evaluation of patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015, 8:221-7. 10.1007/s12178-015-9279-6
  21. Gross CE, Haughom B, Chahal J, Holmes GB Jr: Treatments for avascular necrosis of the talus: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014, 7:387-97. 10.1177/1938640014521831

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/221491-talus-avascular-necrosis-as-a-rare-complication-of-cushings-disease-a-case-report?score_article=true#!/