Simultaneous Pituitary and Adrenal Adenomas in a Patient with Non ACTH Dependent Cushing Syndrome

Posted on April 23, 2026 by MaryO

Highlights

•

Cushing syndrome (CS) is a rare disorder with a variety of underlying etiologies.

•

CS is expected to affect 0.2 to 5 people per million per year.

•

Adrenal-dependent CS is an uncommon variant of CS.

•

This study reports a rare occurrence of pituitary and adrenal adenoma with CS.

Abstract

Introduction

Cushing syndrome is a rare disorder with a variety of underlying etiologies, that can be exogenous or endogenous (adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent or ACTH-independent). The current study aims to report a case of ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome with adrenal adenoma and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma.

Case report

A 37–year–old female presented with amenorrhea for the last year, associated with weight gain. She had a moon face, buffalo hump, and central obesity. A 24-hour urine collection for cortisol was performed, revealing elevated cortisol. Cortisol level was non-suppressed after administering dexamethasone. MRI of the pituitary revealed a pituitary microadenoma, and the CT scan of the abdomen with adrenal protocol revealed a left adrenal adenoma.

Discussion

Early diagnosis may be postponed due to the variety of clinical presentations and the referral of patients to different subspecialists based on their dominant symptoms (gynecological, dermatological, cardiovascular, psychiatric); it is, therefore, critical to consider the entire clinical presentation for correct diagnosis.

Conclusion

Due to the diversity in the presentation of CS, an accurate clinical, physical and endocrine examination is always recommended.

Keywords

Cushing syndrome
Cushing’s disease
Adrenal adenoma
Pituitary adenoma
Urine free cortisol

1. Introduction

Cushing syndrome (CS) is a collection of clinical manifestations caused by an excess of glucocorticoids [1]. CS is a rare disorder with a variety of underlying etiologies that can be exogenous due to continuous corticosteroid therapy for any underlying inflammatory illness or endogenous due to either adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent or ACTH-independent [2], [3]. Cushing syndrome is expected to affect 0.2 to 5 people per million per year. Around 10% of such cases involve children [4], [5]. ACTH-dependent glucocorticoid excess owing to pituitary adenoma accounts for the majority (60–70%) of endogenous CS, with primary adrenal causes accounting for only 20–30% and ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors accounting for the remaining 5–10% [6]. Adrenal-dependent CS is an uncommon variant of CS caused mostly by benign (90%) or malignant (8%) adrenal tumors or, less frequently, bilateral micronodular (1%) or macronodular (1%) adrenal hyperplasia [7].

The current study aims to report a case of ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome with adrenal adenoma and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. The report has been arranged in line with SCARE guidelines and includes a brief literature review [8].

2. Case report

2.1. Patient’s information

A 37–year–old female presented with amenorrhea for the last year, associated with weight gain. She denied having polyuria, polydipsia, headaches, visual changes, dizziness, dryness of the skin, cold intolerance, or constipation. She had no history of chronic disease and denied using steroids. She visited an internist, a general surgeon, and a gynecologist and was treated for hypothyroidism. She was put on Thyroxin 100 μg daily, and oral contraceptive pills were given for her menstrual problems. Last time, the patient was referred to an endocrinology clinic, and they reviewed the clinical and physical examinations.

2.2. Clinical examination

She had a moon face, buffalo hump, central obesity, pink striae over her abdomen, and proximal weakness of the upper limbs. After reviewing the history and clinical examination, CS was suspected.

2.3. Diagnostic assessment

Because the thyroid function test revealed low thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free T3, and freeT4, the patient was sent for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary, which revealed a pituitary microadenoma (7 ∗ 6 ∗ 5) mm (Fig. 1). Since the patient was taking thyroxin and oral contraceptive pills, the investigations were postponed for another six weeks due to the contraceptive pills’ influence on the results of the hormonal assessment for CS. After six weeks of no medication, a 24-hour urinary free cortisol (UFC) was performed three times, revealing elevated cortisol levels (1238, 1100, and 1248) nmol (normal range, 100–400) nmol. A dexamethasone suppression test was done (after administering dexamethasone tab 1 mg at 11 p.m., serum cortisol was measured at 9 a.m.). The morning serum cortisol level was 620 nmol (non-suppressed), which normally should be less than 50 nmol. The ACTH level was below 1 pg/mL.

Fig. 1

  1. Download : Download high-res image (103KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Fig. 1. Contrast enhanced T1W weighted MRI (coronal section) showing small 7 mm hypo-enhanced microadenoma (yellow arrow) in right side of pituitary gland with mild superior bulge.

Based on these findings, ACTH independent CS was suspected. The computerized tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen with adrenal protocol revealed a left adrenal adenoma (33 mm × 25 mm) without features of malignancy (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

  1. Download : Download high-res image (168KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Fig. 2. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen with IV contrast, coronal section, showing 33 mm × 25 mm lobulated enhanced left adrenal tumor (yellow arrow), showing absolute washout on dynamic adrenal CT protocol, consistent with adrenal adenoma.

2.4. Therapeutic intervention

The patient was referred to the urologist clinic for left adrenalectomy after preparation for surgery and perioperative hormonal management. She underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy and remained in the hospital for two days. The histopathology results supported the diagnosis of adrenal adenoma.

2.5. Follow-up

She was released home after two days on oral hydrocortisone 20 mg in the morning and 10 mg in the afternoon. After one month of follow-up, serum cortisol was 36 nmol, with the resolution of some features such as weight reduction (3 kg) and skin color (pink striae became white).

3. Discussion

Cushing’s syndrome is a serious and well-known medical condition that results from persistent exposure of the body to excessive glucocorticoids, either from endogenous or, most frequently, exogenous sources [9]. The average age of diagnosis is 41.4 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 3:1 [10]. ACTH-dependent CS accounts for almost 80% of endogenous CS, while ACTH-independent CS accounts for nearly 20% [10]. This potentially fatal condition is accompanied by several comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, coagulopathy, cardiovascular disease, infections, and fractures [11]. Exogenous CS, also known as iatrogenic CS, is more prevalent than endogenous CS and is caused by the injection of supraphysiologic glucocorticoid dosages [12]. ACTH-independent CS is induced by uncontrolled cortisol release from an adrenal gland lesion, most often an adenoma, adrenocortical cancer, or, in rare cases, ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia or primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease [13].

The majority of data suggests that early diagnosis is critical for reducing morbidity and mortality. Detection is based on clinical suspicion initially, followed by biochemical confirmation [14]. The clinical manifestation of CS varies depending on the severity and duration of glucocorticoid excess [14]. Some individuals may manifest varying symptoms and signs because of a rhythmic change in cortisol secretion, resulting in cyclical CS [15]. The classical symptoms of CS include weight gain, hirsutism, striae, plethora, hypertension, ecchymosis, lethargy, monthly irregularities, diminished libido, and proximal myopathy [16]. Neurobehavioral presentations include anxiety, sadness, mood swings, and memory loss [17]. Less commonly presented features include headaches, acne, edema, abdominal pain, backache, recurrent infection, female baldness, dorsal fat pad, frank diabetes, electrocardiographic abnormalities suggestive of cardiac hypertrophy, osteoporotic fractures, and cardiovascular disease from accelerated atherosclerosis [10]. The current case presented with amenorrhea, weight gain, moon face, buffalo hump, and skin discoloration of the abdomen.

Similar to the current case, early diagnosis may be postponed due to the variety of clinical presentations and the referral of patients to different subspecialists based on their dominant symptoms (gynecological, dermatological, cardiovascular, psychiatric); it is, therefore, critical to consider the entire clinical presentation for correct diagnosis [18]. Weight gain may be less apparent in children, but there is frequently an arrest in growth with a fall in height percentile and a delay in puberty [19].

The diagnosis and confirmation of the etiology can be difficult and time-consuming, requiring a variety of laboratory testing and imaging studies [20]. According to endocrine society guidelines, the initial assessment of CS must include one or more of the three following tests: 24-hour UFC measurement; evaluation of the diurnal variation of cortisol secretion by assessing the midnight serum or salivary cortisol level; and a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test, typically the 1 mg overnight test [21]. Although UFC has sufficient sensitivity and specificity, it does not function well in milder cases of Cushing’s syndrome [22]. In CS patients, the typical circadian rhythm of cortisol secretion is disrupted, and a high late-night cortisol serum level is the earliest and most sensitive diagnostic indicator of the condition [23]. In the current case, the UFC was elevated, and cortisol was unsuppressed after administration of dexamethasone.

All patients with CS should have a high-resolution pituitary MRI with a gadolinium-based contrast agent to prove the existence or absence of a pituitary lesion and to identify the source of ACTH between pituitary adenomas and ectopic lesions [24]. Adrenal CT scan is the imaging modality of choice for preoperatively localizing and subtyping adrenocortical lesions in ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome [9]. MRI of the pituitary gland of the current case showed a microadenoma and a CT scan of the adrenals showed left adrenal adenoma.

Surgical resection of the origin of the ACTH or glucocorticoid excess (pituitary adenoma, nonpituitary tumor-secreting ACTH, or adrenal tumor) is still the first-line treatment of all forms of CS because it leaves normal adjacent structures and results in prompt remission and inevitable recovery of regular adrenal function [12], [25]. Laparoscopic (retroperitoneal or transperitoneal) adrenalectomy has become the gold standard technique for adrenal adenomas since it is associated with fewer postoperative morbidity, hospitalization, and expense when compared to open adrenalectomy [17]. In refractory cases, or when a patient is not a good candidate for surgery, cortisol-lowering medication may be employed [26]. The current case underwent left adrenalectomy.

Symptoms of CS, such as central obesity, muscular wasting or weakness, acne, hirsutism, and purple striae generally improve first and may subside gradually over a few months or even a year; nevertheless, these symptoms may remain in 10–30% of patients [27]. Glucocorticoid replacement is essential after adrenal-sparing curative surgery until the pituitary-adrenal function returns, which might take up to two years, especially if adrenal adenomas have been resected [25]. Chronic glucocorticoid excess causes lots of new co-morbidities, lowering the quality of life and increasing mortality. The most common causes of mortality in CS are cardiovascular disease and infections [28]. After one month of follow-up, serum cortisol was 36 nmol, and several features, such as weight loss (3 kg) and skin color, were resolved (pink striae became white).

In conclusion, the coexistence of adrenal adenoma and pituitary adenoma with CS is a rare possibility. Due to the diversity in the presentation of CS, an accurate clinical, physical and endocrine examination is always recommended. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard for treating adrenal adenoma.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s family for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.

Ethical approval

Approval is not necessary for case report (till 3 cases in single report) in our locality.

The family gave consent for the publication of the report.

Funding

None.

Guarantor

Fahmi Hussein Kakamad, Fahmi.hussein@univsul.edu.iq.

Research registration number

Not applicable.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Abdulwahid M. Salh: major contribution of the idea, literature review, final approval of the manuscript.

Rawa Bapir: Surgeon performing the operation, final approval of the manuscript.

Fahmi H. Kakamad: Writing the manuscript, literature review, final approval of the manuscript.

Soran H. Tahir, Fattah H. Fattah, Aras Gh. Mahmood, Rawezh Q. Salih, Shaho F. Ahmed: literature review, final approval of the manuscript.

Declaration of competing interest

None to be declared.

References

Filed under: adrenal, Cushing, Cushing's | Tagged: , , | Leave a comment »

Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Cushing’s Syndrome

Posted on April 8, 2026 by MaryO

D. Lynn Loriaux, M.D., Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 2017; 376:1451-1459April 13, 2017DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1505550

More than a century ago, Harvey Cushing introduced the term “pluriglandular syndrome” to describe a disorder characterized by rapid development of central obesity, arterial hypertension, proximal muscle weakness, diabetes mellitus, oligomenorrhea, hirsutism, thin skin, and ecchymoses.1 Cushing knew that this syndrome was associated with adrenal cancer,2 and he suspected that some cases might have a pituitary component.

On September 6, 1911, he performed a craniotomy on one of his patients (referred to as Case XLV) but found no pituitary tumor.3 In his description of the case, he goes on to say that “we may perchance be on the way toward the recognition of the consequences of hyperadrenalism.”2 With time, it became clear that the disorder could be caused by small basophilic adenomas of the pituitary gland,4 and the pluriglandular syndrome became known as Cushing’s syndrome.

Fuller Albright provided the next conceptual advance in an extraordinary report, published in the first volume of the Laurentian Hormone Conference, “The Effects of Hormones on Osteogenesis in Man”5:

It has been our concept that protoplasm in general, like the protoplasmic matrix of bone, is constantly being anabolized and catabolized at one and the same time; a factor which increases catabolism would lead to very much the same net result as a factor which inhibits anabolism, but there would be some differences; it is my belief that the “S” hormone [cortisol] is anti-anabolic rather than catabolic. . . . The anti-anabolism . . . is contrasted with the increased anabolism due to an excess of the “N” hormone [testosterone] in the adreno-genital syndrome. This anti-anabolism of protoplasm in Cushing’s syndrome accounts for not only the osteoporosis, but the muscular weakness, the thin skin, probably the easy bruisability, and possibly the atrophy of the lymphoid tissues and thymus.

Nonetheless, in the intervening years, the physical examination of patients suspected to have glucocorticoid excess focused on the anabolic changes, essentially to the exclusion of the antianabolic changes. With the rapid increase in the rate of obesity in the general population, Cushing’s syndrome can no longer be reliably separated from the metabolic syndrome of simple obesity on the basis of anabolic signs alone. However, the antianabolic changes in Cushing’s syndrome are very effective in making this distinction. This review focuses on the problems introduced into the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome by the obesity epidemic and on ways to alter the traditional approach, using the antianabolic changes of excess cortisol to separate patients with Cushing’s syndrome from obese patients with the insulin-resistant metabolic syndrome.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564) published his transformational work on human anatomy, De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem, in 1543. It is the book that corrected many of Galen’s anatomical errors. The book was met with considerable hostility. As an example, Jacobus Sylvius (Jacques Dubois, 1478–1555), the world’s leading anatomist at the time and Vesalius’s former mentor, on being asked his opinion of the work, replied, “Galen is not wrong. It is man that has changed, and not for the better.”6 This was not true then, but it is true now.

Approximately one third of the U.S. population is obese. The worldwide prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among obese persons is conservatively estimated at 10%; that is, approximately 12 million people have the obesity-related metabolic syndrome.7,8 The clinical picture of this syndrome is almost the same as that of Cushing’s syndrome.9,10 The prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome is about 75 cases per 1 million population, or 24,000 affected persons. On the basis of these prevalence estimates, the chance that a person with obesity, hypertension, hirsutism, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia has Cushing’s syndrome is about 1 in 500. In Harvey Cushing’s era, when obesity was rare, making the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome was the most certain aspect of the management of this disorder. Today, making the diagnosis is the least certain aspect in the care of patients with Cushing’s syndrome.

The metabolic syndrome caused by glucocorticoid hypersecretion can be differentiated from the obesity-associated metabolic syndrome with the use of a careful assessment of Albright’s antianabolic effects of cortisol. These effects — osteopenia, thin skin, and ecchymoses — are present in patients with Cushing’s syndrome but not in patients with simple obesity.

Patients in whom osteoporosis is diagnosed radiographically are more likely to have Cushing’s syndrome than those who do not have osteoporosis, with a positive likelihood ratio of 11.11-13 Today, a z score of −2 at the lumbar spine supports this criterion. Skinfold thickness is conveniently measured with an electrocardiographic caliper that has the points dulled with a sharpening stone and the screws tightened so that the gap is maintained when the caliper is removed from the skinfold. The skin over the proximal phalanx of the middle finger of the nondominant hand is commonly used for this measurement

 

(Figure 1 FIGURE 1Measurement of Skinfold Thickness.). A thickness of less than 2 mm is considered to be thin skin. Patients who have thin skin are more likely to have Cushing’s syndrome, with a positive likelihood ratio of 116

 

(Figure 2 FIGURE 2 Comparison of Skinfold Thickness in Patients with Cushing’s Syndrome and Those with Other Conditions Related to Insulin Resistance.).13-15 Finally, patients who have three or more ecchymoses that are larger than 1 cm in diameter and not associated with trauma such as venipuncture are more likely to have Cushing’s syndrome than are patients without such findings, with a positive likelihood ratio of 4.13,16

If we know the prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome in the population of persons with the obesity-related metabolic syndrome, we can begin to calculate the probability that a person has Cushing’s syndrome, using the likelihood ratios for the antianabolic features observed on physical examination. Likelihood ratios can be converted into probabilities with the use of Bayes’ theorem. This conversion is markedly facilitated by the Fagan nomogram for this purpose.17

The prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome is not known, but it can be estimated. Two persons per 1 million population die from adrenal cancer every year.18 The current life span for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma, after diagnosis, is between 2 and 4 years.19,20 Allowing 3 years to make the diagnosis, the prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome is 6 cases per million. In most case series of Cushing’s syndrome, an average of 8% of patients have adrenal carcinoma.21 If 6 per million is 8% of the group, the total Cushing’s syndrome group is 75 persons per million, or 24,000 persons. If all 24,000 patients are included in the metabolic syndrome group, comprising 12 million people, the prevalence of Cushing’s syndrome is 0.002, or 0.2%. With a probability of 0.2% and a likelihood ratio of 116 for thin skin, 18 for osteopenia, and 4 for ecchymoses, the probability that a patient with these three findings has Cushing’s syndrome is 95%.

URINARY FREE CORTISOL

The diagnosis of all endocrine diseases requires a clinical presentation that is compatible with the disease, as well as identification of the pathophysiological cause. An assessment for excess glucocorticoid effects can be made by measuring the 24-hour urinary free cortisol level.22 There are two kinds of free cortisol: plasma protein-unbound cortisol and cortisol unconjugated to sulfuric or hyaluronic acid. Protein-unbound cortisol is filtered in the glomerulus and then reabsorbed in the collecting system. About 3% of filtered cortisol ends up in the urine. This free cortisol in the urine is unconjugated. Thus, the urinary free cortisol level is a direct reflection of the free, bioactive cortisol level in plasma. The free cortisol level is quantified in a 24-hour urine sample by averaging the increased secretion of cortisol in the morning and the decreased secretion in the afternoon and at night. Urinary creatinine is also measured to determine whether the collection is complete. Creatinine levels of less than 1.5 g per day for men and less than 1 g per day for women indicate incomplete collection, and the test should be repeated in patients with these levels.

Unconjugated cortisol can be extracted directly from urine with a nonpolar lipid solvent. After extraction, the cortisol is purified by means of high-pressure liquid chromatography and then quantified with a binding assay, usually radioimmunoassay. Free cortisol also can be quantitated directly by means of mass spectroscopy. The urinary free cortisol assay of choice uses high-pressure liquid chromatographic separation followed by mass spectrometric quantitation.23 With the use of this assay, the urinary free cortisol level in healthy adults ranges from 8 to 51 μg per 24 hours (mean [±SD], 23±8). Clinical depression increases urinary free cortisol excretion, and most studies show that the level of urinary free cortisol ranges from 10 to 60 μg per day in patients with typical clinical signs and symptoms of depression. If we use 60 μg per day as the cutoff between normal values (<60 μg per day) and elevated values (≥60 μg per day), urinary free cortisol excretion of 62 μg per day or more has a positive likelihood ratio of 11.24 Thus, in a patient presenting with obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and hirsutism who has thin skin, osteopenia, ecchymoses, and an elevated urinary free cortisol level, the probability of Cushing’s syndrome is 1 (100%). For such patients, the clinician should move directly to a differential diagnostic evaluation.

DEXAMETHASONE-SUPPRESSION TEST

The dexamethasone-suppression test is commonly used in the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. This test was developed by Grant Liddle in the early 1960s as a differential diagnostic test to separate corticotropin-dependent from corticotropin-independent Cushing’s syndrome. This is now done by measuring the plasma corticotropin level. Unfortunately, dexamethasone suppression has continued to be used as a screening test for Cushing’s syndrome.

The control group for this test comprises patients with obesity and depression in whom cortisol secretion is not suppressed in response to an oral dose of 1 mg of dexamethasone at midnight. Of the current U.S. population of 360 million people, approximately one third (120 million people) are obese. Of those who are obese, 10% (12 million people) have depression. In half these patients (6 million people), the plasma cortisol level will not be suppressed in response to a dexamethasone challenge. On the basis of my estimate of the current prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome (24,000 cases) and the estimate of the at-risk population (6 million persons), the positive predictive value of the dexamethasone-suppression test is only 0.4%. Thus, this test should not influence what the physician does next and should no longer be used for this purpose.

OUTLIERS

For patients with convincing evidence of Cushing’s syndrome on physical examination and an elevated 24-hour urinary free cortisol level, the differential diagnostic process outlined below should be initiated. However, a small group of patients will not meet these criteria.

Some patients have a strongly positive physical examination but low or zero urinary free cortisol excretion. Plasma corticotropin levels are suppressed in these patients. These patients are receiving exogenous glucocorticoids. The glucocorticoid must be identified, and a plan must be made for its discontinuation. Sometimes the glucocorticoid is being given by proxy (e.g., by a parent to a child), and no history of glucocorticoid administration can be found. Nevertheless, the glucocorticoid must be identified and discontinued.

Other patients have few or no clinical signs of Cushing’s syndrome but do have elevated urinary free cortisol excretion. Plasma corticotropin is measurable in these patients. They are usually identified during an evaluation for arterial hypertension. All such patients should undergo inferior petrosal sinus sampling to determine the source of corticotropin secretion. Ectopic sources are almost always neoplastic and are usually in the chest.25 Patients with eutopic secretion usually have the syndrome of generalized glucocorticoid resistance.26

Finally, a few patients have convincing findings on physical examination coupled with a normal urinary free cortisol level. In such cases, the clinician should make sure that urinary free cortisol is being measured with high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, that renal function is normal, and that the collections are complete. “Periodic” Cushing’s syndrome must be ruled out by measuring urinary free cortisol frequently over the course of a month.27 If these efforts fail, the patient should be followed for a year, with urinary free cortisol measurements performed frequently. No additional tests should be performed until the situation is sorted out. More tests would be likely to lead to an unnecessary surgical procedure.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

The differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is shown in Figure 3

FIGURE 3Differential Diagnosis of Cushing’s Syndrome.. If plasma corticotropin is measurable, the disease process is corticotropin-dependent. If corticotropin is not measurable, the process is corticotropin-independent.

Corticotropin-dependent causes of Cushing’s syndrome are divided into those in which the corticotropin comes from the pituitary (eutopic causes) and those in which the corticotropin comes from elsewhere (ectopic causes). This differentiation is made with the measurement of corticotropin in inferior petrosal sinus plasma and the simultaneous measurement of corticotropin in peripheral (antecubital) plasma immediately after corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation of pituitary corticotropin secretion. In samples obtained 4, 6, and 15 minutes after stimulation with corticotropin-releasing hormone, eutopic corticotropin secretion is associated with a ratio of the central-plasma corticotropin level to the peripheral-plasma corticotropin level of 3 or more. Ectopic corticotropin secretion is associated with a central-to-peripheral corticotropin ratio of less than 3. The positive predictive value of this test is 1 (Figure 4

FIGURE 4Maximal Ratio of Corticotropin in Inferior Petrosal Sinus Plasma to Corticotropin in Peripheral Plasma in Patients with Cushing’s Syndrome, Ectopic Corticotropin Secretion, or Adrenal Disease.).28

Although some authorities suggest that inferior petrosal sinus sampling can safely be bypassed in patients with corticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome and a well-defined pituitary adenoma, I disagree. The incidence of nonfunctioning pituitary microadenomas is between 15% and 40%.29 This means that up to 40% of patients with ectopic secretion of corticotropin have an incidental pituitary abnormality. If it is assumed that the pituitary abnormality is responsible for corticotropin secretion, 15 to 40% of patients with ectopic secretion of corticotropin will be misdiagnosed and submitted to a transsphenoidal exploration of the sella turcica and pituitary gland. The prevalence of ectopic corticotropin secretion in the population of patients with undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome is about 10%, accounting for 2400 patients. Up to 40% of these patients, or 960, have an incidental pituitary tumor. The mortality associated with transsphenoidal microadenomectomy is 1%.30 If all 360 to 960 patients undergo this procedure, there will be up to 10 deaths from an operation that can have no benefit. For this reason alone, all patients with corticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome should undergo inferior petrosal sinus sampling to confirm the source of corticotropin secretion before any surgical intervention is contemplated.

Patients with eutopic corticotropin secretion are almost certain to have a corticotropin-secreting pituitary microadenoma. An occasional patient will have alcohol-induced pseudo–Cushing’s syndrome. The slightest suggestion of alcoholism should lead to a 3-week abstinence period before any surgery is considered.31

Patients with ectopic corticotropin secretion are first evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the chest. In two thirds of these patients, a tumor will be found.25 If nothing is found in the chest, MRI of the abdominal and pelvic organs is performed. If these additional imaging studies are also negative, there are two options: bilateral adrenalectomy or blockade of cortisol synthesis. If blockade is chosen, the patient should undergo repeat scanning at 6-month intervals.32 If no source is found by the end of the second year, it is unlikely that the source will ever be found, and bilateral adrenalectomy should be performed for definitive treatment (Doppman JL: personal communication).

Corticotropin-independent Cushing’s syndrome is usually caused by an adrenal neoplasm. Benign tumors tend to be small (<5 cm in diameter) and secrete a single hormone, cortisol. The contralateral adrenal gland is suppressed by the cortisol secreted from the tumorous gland. If the value for Hounsfield units is less than 10 and the washout of contrast material is greater than 60% at 15 minutes, the tumor is almost certainly benign.33 Such tumors can be treated successfully with laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

The syndromes of micronodular and macronodular adrenal dysplasia usually affect both adrenal glands. The nodules secrete cortisol. Corticotropin is suppressed, as is the internodular tissue of the adrenal glands. Percutaneous bilateral adrenalectomy, followed by glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid treatment, is curative.

Adrenal tumors secreting more than one hormone (i.e., cortisol and androgen or estrogen) are almost always malignant. Surgical removal of all detectable disease is indicated, as is a careful search for metastases. If metastases are found, they should be removed. This usually requires an open adrenalectomy. It goes without saying that adrenal tumors, nodules, and metastases should be treated by the most experienced endocrine cancer surgeon available.

If the plasma cortisol level on the morning after a transsphenoidal microadenomectomy is 0, the operation was a success. The patient should be treated with oral hydrocortisone, at a dose of 12 mg per square meter of body-surface area once a day in the morning, and a tetracosactide (Cortrosyn) stimulation test should be performed at 3-month intervals. When the tetracosactide-stimulated plasma cortisol level is higher than 20 μg per deciliter (551 μmol per liter), cortisol administration can be stopped. The same rule applies in the case of a unilateral adrenalectomy. If the adrenalectomy is bilateral, cortisol, at a dose of 12 to 15 mg per square meter per day, and fludrocortisone (Florinef), at a dose of 100 μg per day, should be prescribed as lifelong therapy.

SUMMARY

The obesity epidemic has led to necessary changes in the evaluation and treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome. The most dramatic change is the emphasis on the antianabolic alterations in Cushing’s syndrome, which can provide a strong basis for separating patients with Cushing’s syndrome from the more numerous patients with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. More can be done along these lines. Likelihood ratios are known for proximal muscle weakness and can be known for brain atrophy and growth failure in children.

The dexamethasone-suppression test, although still very popular, no longer has a role in the evaluation and treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Only three biochemical tests are needed: urinary free cortisol, plasma corticotropin, and plasma cortisol measurements. Urinary free cortisol excretion is the test that confirms the clinical diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. To be trustworthy, it must be performed in the most stringent way, with the use of high-pressure liquid chromatography followed by mass spectrometric quantitation of cortisol. Measurement of plasma corticotropin is used to separate corticotropin-dependent from corticotropin-independent causes of Cushing’s syndrome and to separate eutopic from ectopic secretion of corticotropin. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling should be performed in all patients with corticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome because of the high prevalence of nonfunctioning incidental pituitary adenomas among such patients. Measurement of plasma cortisol has only one use: determining the success or failure of transsphenoidal microadenomectomy or adrenalectomy. If the plasma cortisol level is not measurable on the morning after the operation (<5 μg per deciliter [138 μmol per liter]), the procedure was a success; if it is measurable, the operation failed. The surgeon must not administer intraoperative or postoperative synthetic glucocorticoids until the plasma cortisol level has been measured.

Successful evaluation of a patient who is suspected of having Cushing’s syndrome requires an endocrinologist who is skilled in physical diagnosis. Also required is a laboratory that measures urinary free cortisol using high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry and that can measure plasma cortisol and plasma corticotropin by means of radioimmunoassay.

Inferior petrosal sinus sampling is performed by an interventional radiologist. The treatment for all causes of Cushing’s syndrome, other than exogenous glucocorticoids, is surgical, and neurosurgeons, endocrine surgeons, and cancer surgeons are needed. This level of multidisciplinary medical expertise is usually found only at academic medical centers. Thus, most, if not all, patients with Cushing’s syndrome should be referred to such a center for treatment.

Disclosure forms provided by the author are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

SOURCE INFORMATION

From the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Loriaux at the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., L607, Portland, OR 97239-3098, or at .

From http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1505550

Filed under: adrenal, Cushing, Cushing's, Helpful Doctors, pituitary | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Day 8, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 8, 2026 by MaryO

It’s Here!

Dr. Cushing was born in Cleveland Ohio. The fourth generation in his family to become a physician, he showed great promise at Harvard Medical School and in his residency at Johns Hopkins Hospital (1896 to 1900), where he learned cerebral surgery under William S. Halsted.

After studying a year in Europe, he introduced the blood pressure sphygmomanometer to the U.S.A. He began a surgical practice in Baltimore while teaching at Johns Hopkins Hospital (1901 to 1911), and gained a national reputation for operations such as the removal of brain tumors. From 1912 until 1932 he was a professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School and surgeon in chief at Peter Bent Brigham Hospital in Boston, with time off during World War I to perform surgery for the U.S. forces in France; out of this experience came his major paper on wartime brain injuries (1918). In addition to his pioneering work in performing and teaching brain surgery, he was the reigning expert on the pituitary gland since his 1912 publication on the subject; later he discovered the condition of the pituitary now known as “Cushing’s disease“.

Read more about Dr. Cushing

Today, April 8th, is Cushing’s Awareness Day. Please wear your Cushing’s ribbons, t-shirts, awareness bracelets or Cushing’s colors (blue and yellow) and hand out Robin’s wonderful Awareness Cards to get a discussion going with anyone who will listen.

And don’t just raise awareness on April 8.  Any day is a good day to raise awareness.

harvey-book

I found this biography fascinating!

I found Dr. Cushing’s life to be most interesting. I had previously known of him mainly because his name is associated with a disease I had – Cushing’s. This book doesn’t talk nearly enough about how he came to discover the causes of Cushing’s disease, but I found it to be a valuable resource, anyway.
I was so surprised to learn of all the “firsts” Dr. Cushing brought to medicine and the improvements that came about because of him. Dr. Cushing introduced the blood pressure sphygmomanometer to America, and was a pioneer in the use of X-rays.

He even won a Pulitzer Prize. Not for medicine, but for writing the biography of another Doctor (Sir William Osler).

Before his day, nearly all brain tumor patients died. He was able to get the number down to only 5%, unheard of in the early 1900s.

This is a very good book to read if you want to learn more about this most interesting, influential and innovative brain surgeon.

What Would Harvey Say?

harvey-book

(BPT) – More than 80 years ago renowned neurosurgeon, Dr. Harvey Cushing, discovered a tumor on the pituitary gland as the cause of a serious, hormone disorder that leads to dramatic physical changes in the body in addition to life-threatening health concerns. The discovery was so profound it came to be known as Cushing’s disease. While much has been learned about Cushing’s disease since the 1930s, awareness of this rare pituitary condition is still low and people often struggle for years before finding the right diagnosis.

Read on to meet the man behind the discovery and get his perspective on the present state of Cushing’s disease.

* What would Harvey Cushing say about the time it takes for people with Cushing’s disease to receive an accurate diagnosis?

Cushing’s disease still takes too long to diagnose!

Despite advances in modern technology, the time to diagnosis for a person with Cushing’s disease is on average six years. This is partly due to the fact that symptoms, which may include facial rounding, thin skin and easy bruising, excess body and facial hair and central obesity, can be easily mistaken for other conditions. Further awareness of the disease is needed as early diagnosis has the potential to lead to a more favorable outcome for people with the condition.

* What would Harvey Cushing say about the advances made in how the disease is diagnosed?

Significant progress has been made as several options are now available for physicians to use in diagnosing Cushing’s disease.

In addition to routine blood work and urine testing, health care professionals are now also able to test for biochemical markers – molecules that are found in certain parts of the body including blood and urine and can help to identify the presence of a disease or condition.

* What would Harvey Cushing say about disease management for those with Cushing’s disease today?

Patients now have choices but more research is still needed.

There are a variety of disease management options for those living with Cushing’s disease today. The first line and most common management approach for Cushing’s disease is the surgical removal of the tumor. However, there are other management options, such as medication and radiation that may be considered for patients when surgery is not appropriate or effective.

* What would Harvey Cushing say about the importance of ongoing monitoring in patients with Cushing’s disease?

Routine check-ups and ongoing monitoring are key to successfully managing Cushing’s disease.

The same tests used in diagnosing Cushing’s disease, along with imaging tests and clinical suspicion, are used to assess patients’ hormone levels and monitor for signs and symptoms of a relapse. Unfortunately, more than a third of patients experience a relapse in the condition so even patients who have been surgically treated require careful long-term follow up.

* What would Harvey Cushing say about Cushing’s disease patient care?

Cushing’s disease is complex and the best approach for patients is a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals working together guiding patient care.

Whereas years ago patients may have only worked with a neurosurgeon, today patients are typically treated by a variety of health care professionals including endocrinologists, neurologists, radiologists, mental health professionals and nurses. We are much more aware of the psychosocial impact of Cushing’s disease and patients now have access to mental health professionals, literature, patient advocacy groups and support groups to help them manage the emotional aspects of the disease.

Learn More

Novartis is committed to helping transform the care of rare pituitary conditions and bringing meaningful solutions to people living with Cushing’s disease. Recognizing the need for increased awareness, Novartis developed the “What Would Harvey Cushing Say?” educational initiative that provides hypothetical responses from Dr. Cushing about various aspects of Cushing’s disease management based on the Endocrine Society’s Clinical Guidelines.

For more information about Cushing’s disease, visit www.CushingsDisease.com or watch educational Cushing’s disease videos on the Novartis YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/Novartis.

From http://www.jsonline.com/sponsoredarticles/health-wellness/what-would-harvey-cushing-say-about-cushings-disease-today8087390508-253383751.html

Filed under: Cushing, Cushing's, Helpful Doctors, pituitary | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Complete Surgical Resection of Cortisol Secreting Neuroendocrine Thymic Tumour

Posted on November 13, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

Introduction

Neuroendocrine tumours of the thymus are extremely rare, with an estimated incidence of about 1 in 5 million people. Although data is limited, complete surgical resection remains the most significant prognostic factor for improved survival and disease-free outcomes, with adjuvant radiotherapy playing a role in cases where resection margins are close. This case report details the management of a cortisol secreting pT1bN0 atypical carcinoid of the thymus in a 43-year-old male.

Case report

43-year-old male presented with Cushing’s syndrome and was diagnosed with a cortical secreting atypical carcinoid of the thymus. He underwent a robotic thymectomy. Recurrent disease on a DOTATATE-PET CT scan resulted in a second surgery involving complete resection of the mediastinal tumour which had invaded the pericardium, as well as wedge resection of the lung and lymph node sampling. This was followed by adjuvant radiotherapy due to close proximity of the lesion to the margin (< 3 mm).

Discussion

Although paraneoplastic syndromes such as Cushing’s syndrome are rare manifestations of thymic neuroendocrine tumours and can result in challenging diagnoses, it is vital to have a high index of suspicion towards ectopic ACTH secretion in order to facilitate timely initiation of multimodal disease management for these patients including surgery and radiotherapy.

Conclusion

Surgical management has been shown to offer the greatest prognosis in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. Adjuvant radiotherapy plays a role where resection margins are close.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Neuroendocrine tumours of the thymus (NETT) are extremely rare, with an estimated incidence of about 1 in 5 million people [1], accounting for about 2–5% of thymic tumours and 0.4–3.4% of all carcinoid tumours [2]. Around 50% of neuroendocrine tumours of the thymus are hormonally active, with patients presenting with paraneoplastic symptoms such as Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic production of ACTH. A review of 157 cases showed that males have a 3:1 increased risk of developing NETTs compared to women [3], with patients typically being heavy smokers and diagnosed between 40 and 60 years old. Atypical carcinoid tumours are differentiated from typical carcinoid tumours by their increased mitotic rate (2–10 per 2mm2/10 HPF) or areas of focal necrosis and account for about 40–50% of all thymic neuroendocrine tumours [1]. We present a case of a male patient who underwent complete excision and adjuvant radiotherapy for a neuroendocrine carcinoma with elevated mitotic count.

Case report

A previously fit and well 43-year-old male initially presented with features of Cushing’s syndrome, namely weight gain, hypertension and skin changes. He had a past medical history of polycystic kidney disease and asthma. The Cushing’s syndrome was found to be related to a 56 mm cortisol secreting pT1bN0 neuroendocrine carcinoma of the thymus. He underwent a right sided robotic thymectomy in July 2021.

A DOTATATE PET CT scan showed recurrence of his thymic carcinoid at the level of the groove between the right main pulmonary artery and right atrium, growing very close to the phrenic nerve. It was advised for him to undergo complete excision of the lesion requiring a joint approach from cardiac and thoracic surgeons. The patient subsequently underwent a median sternotomy, removal of recurrent mediastinal tumour invading the pericardium and wedge resection of the lung, lymph node sampling.

The patient was positioned supine. Femoral vessels were prepared in case there was bleeding which necessitated emergency bypass. Median sternotomy was performed with an oscillating saw due to previous right robotic thymectomy. The pericardium was opened. The tumour was identified at the level of the pulmonary vein and the cavo-atrial junction. En bloc resection of the tumour and the pericardium was performed, dissecting it away from the superior vena cava and the right atrium and wedge resection of the right lower lobe. The right phrenic was identified and spared. Due to previous surgery the phrenic nerve was surrounded by adhesions. A diaphragmatic plication was performed with 4 Ethibond no.5 sutures considering the risk of nerve palsy during dissection. The pericardium was reconstructed with a Prolene mesh fixed with Prolene 3/0.

Histology of the mediastinal tissue and right lung tissue sent showed a mitotic rate of more than 10 which according to the WHO classification of thoracic tumours, would make this a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. However, the morphological features were not of large cell type and therefore the tumour was best described as a NETT with elevated mitotic count. Histology confirmed the diagnosis as being a Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. The tumour had been excised completely with a 1.3 mm margin around the lesion. The patient required adjuvant radiotherapy due to the close proximity of the lesion to the margin (< 3 mm). A dose of 60 Gy over 30 daily fractions was selected in this postoperative adjuvant setting.

Discussion

This patient presented initially with Cushing’s syndrome associated with a cortisol secreting atypical carcinoid of the thymus. The excess glucocorticoid secretion presenting in the symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome can result from an ACTH secreting tumour of the pituitary which would be defined as Cushing’s disease, or less frequently from non-pituitary tumours secreting ACTH which would be defined as ectopic ACTH secretion [4]. Once the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is made, it is essential to differentiate whether this is Cushing’s disease or an ectopic ACTH secretion. Current guidelines advise that inferior petrosal sinus sampling is the gold standard in distinguishing Cushing’s disease from ectopic ACTH secretion where a pituitary MRI is negative [5]. However, due to high cost, invasive nature and the risk of thromboembolic complications, investigations such as the CRH test and high dose dexamethasone suppression test are often preferred. A retrospective analysis looked at 719 patients with neuroendocrine tumours treated in EKPA-Laiko Hospital in Athens, Greece. They found that the prevalence of endocrine neoplastic syndromes in patients with neuroendocrine tumours was only 1.9% [6]. Kamp et al. studied the prevalence of specifically ectopic ACTH syndrome in 918 patients who had been diagnosed with either thoracic or gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. They found that 29 patients, or 3.2% had ectopic ACTH syndrome, with most of these cases being thoracic tumours and 4 of these patients having thymic tumours [7]. This study highlights that although the incidence of ectopic ACTH secretion in thoracic neuroendocrine tumours is relatively rare, resulting in challenging diagnosis, it is important to maintain a high index of suspicion in order to facilitate timely initiation of multimodal management such as surgery and radiotherapy.

A retrospective study at Fukuoka University Hospital looking at 9 cases of NETTs and 16 cases of thymic carcinomas, showed complete resection to be a statistically significant prognostic factor, with the 5-year survival rate and 5-year disease free survival rate being 87.5% and 75% in the thymic neuroendocrine tumour group, and 58.9% and 57.1% in the thymic carcinoma group respectively [8]. Chen et al. looked at a total of 104 patients diagnosed with NETTs, of which 97 underwent surgical resection, with 79 undergoing radical resection. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were found to be 91.8%, 70.2% and 54.6% respectively, with radical resection being found to be a significant factor in the overall survival of patients with NETTs [9]. Due to the rarity of NETTs, few cases are reported, and these studies are limited by their being retrospective in nature and spanning over several decades, possibly affecting the consistency and standardisation of patient treatment. However, it is important to note that complete radical resection of the tumour was consistently shown to be a strong prognostic factor in the overall survival and disease-free survival of patients and this should be attempted wherever possible.

The gentleman in our case required post operative radiotherapy due to the close proximity of the lesion to the margins. A large retrospective study looked at 205 patients treated for neuroendocrine thymic tumours, with 81 patients receiving radiotherapy and 70 out of the 81 receiving it as adjuvant therapy. In this particular study, radiotherapy was not shown to have any significant impact on survival outcomes [10]. An analysis of 12 cases of NETTs noted that 5 of the 6 patients who had presented with local recurrence during follow up had not received any post operative radiotherapy [11, 12], suggesting that adjuvant radiotherapy had resulted in better outcomes in terms of disease-free survival. A large retrospective analysis looking at 1489 patients diagnosed with NETTs or thymic carcinomas, found that the two factors which influenced positive survival outcomes were surgical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. On sub-analysis, it was found that adjuvant radiotherapy had a good prognosis of survival in patients with margin positive tumours and was an independent predictor of survival for both thymic carcinomas and NETTs [12]. Wen et al. analysed 3947 patients in a retrospective study, including 293 neuroendocrine thymic tumours, 2788 thymomas and 866 thymic carcinomas. It was shown that post operative radiotherapy had a significant positive impact on overall survival and cancer specific survival in Masaoka-Koga stage III-IV thymic neuroendocrine tumour patients, as well as had a favourable impact on the overall survival of stage IIB patients [13]. Although these studies provide evidence of the benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy for favourable outcomes and prolonged survival, the last two studies are limited in that due to the rarity of neuroendocrine thymic tumours, they made up only 11 out of 329 (3.3%) of the thymic tumours analysed by Bakhos et al. and 7.4% of cases analysed by Wen et al.l, and the outcomes should therefore be interpreted with caution. The importance of multidisciplinary care involving maximal radical surgical excision as well as the involvement of oncologists and radiotherapists in the management of thoracic carcinoid tumours such as this, is emphasised in Busetto et al. [14].

Conclusion

Neuroendocrine tumours of the thymus (NETT) are exceedingly rare and often present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their aggressive nature and associated paraneoplastic syndromes like Cushing’s syndrome. Complete surgical resection remains the most significant prognostic factor for improved survival and disease-free outcomes, with adjuvant radiotherapy playing a role in cases where resection margins are close. Although the data is limited by the rarity of the disease, existing studies suggest that a multidisciplinary, patient-specific approach, including surgery and radiotherapy, offers the best chance of long-term survival.

Fig. 1

figure 1

Axial CT showing the carcinoid tumour (demonstrated by arrow) in close proximity to innominate vein

Fig. 2

figure 2

DOTATE PET demonstrating significant uptake in carcinoid tumour

Fig. 3

figure 3

Intraoperative visualisation right phrenic nerve (demonstrated by forceps) overlying carcinoid tumour

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Bohnenberger H, Dinter H, König A, Ströbel P. Neuroendocrine Tumors Thymus Mediastinum J Thorac Dis [Internet]. 2017.

  2. Lau J, Ioan Cvasciuc T, Simpson D, C de Jong M, Parameswaran R. Continuing challenges of primary neuroendocrine tumours of the thymus: A concise review. Eur J Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2022.

  3. Chaer R, Massad MG, Evans A, Snow NJ, Geha AS. Primary neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03547-6.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Isidori AM, Kaltsas GA, Pozza C, Frajese V, Newell-Price J, Reznek RH, et al. The ectopic adrenocorticotropin syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, management, and long-term follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-1542.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ilias I, Torpy DJ, Pacak K, Mullen N, Wesley RA, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion: twenty years’ experience at the National Institutes of Health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-2527.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daskalakis K, Chatzelis E, Tsoli M, Papadopoulou-Marketou N, Dimitriadis GK, Tsolakis AV et al. Endocrine paraneoplastic syndromes in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocrine [Internet]. 2018.

  7. Kamp K, Alwani RA, Korpershoek E, Franssen GJH, de Herder WW, Feelders RA. Prevalence and clinical features of the ectopic ACTH syndrome in patients with gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Endocrinol [Internet]. 2015.

  8. Midorikawa K, Miyahara S, Nishino N, Ueda Y, Waseda R, Shiraishi T, et al. Analysis of 25 surgical cases of thymic neuroendocrine tumors and thymic carcinoma. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02723-w.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  9. Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhou M, Guo C, Li S. Real-world clinicopathological features and outcome of thymic neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective single-institution analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02366-x.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  10. Filosso PL, Yao X, Ahmad U, Zhan Y, Huang J, Ruffini E, et al. Outcome of primary neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus: a joint analysis of the international thymic malignancy interest group and the European society of thoracic surgeons databases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.061.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tiffet O, Nicholson AG, Ladas G, Sheppard MN, Goldstraw P. A clinicopathologic study of 12 neuroendocrine tumors arising in the thymus. Chest [Internet]. 2003.

  12. Bakhos CT, Salami AC, Kaiser LR, Petrov RV, Abbas AE. Thymic neuroendocrine tumors and thymic carcinoma: demographics, treatment, and survival. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556984520949287.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Wen J, Chen J, Chen D, Liu D, Xu X, Huang L, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic value of surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for patients with thymic neuroendocrine tumors: a propensity-matched study based on the SEER database. Thorac Cancer. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12868.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  14. Busetto A, Comacchio GM, Verzeletti V, Fares Shamshoum, Fortarezza F, Pezzuto F et al. Bilateral metachronous typical and atypical carcinoid tumors of the lung. Thorac Cancer. 2025;16(8).

Download references

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgements.

Funding

This report has not received funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK

    Puiyee Sophia Chan, Akshay J. Patel, Ishaan Chauhan & Andrea Bille

  2. Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Vincent Drive, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, England, UK

    Akshay J. Patel

Contributions

PSC and AJP wrote the main manuscript text and IC and AB prepared Figs. 1, 2 and 3. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akshay J. Patel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013).

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for the publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editorial office of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Filed under: Cushing, Rare Diseases | Tagged: , , | Leave a comment »

Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumor With Metastasis to the Breast Causing Ectopic Cushing’s Syndrome

Posted on April 9, 2025 by MaryO

Ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion (EAS) is responsible for approximately 10%–18% of Cushing’s syndrome cases. Thymic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) comprise 5%–16% of EAS; therefore, they are very rare and the data about this particular tumors is scarce.

We present a case of a 34-year-old woman with a rapid onset of severe hypercortisolism in April 2016. After initial treatment with a steroid inhibitor (ketoconazole) and diagnostics including 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT, it was shown to be caused by a small thymic NET.

After a successful surgery and the resolution of all symptoms, there was a recurrence after 5 years of observation caused by a metastasis to the breast, shown in the 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT result and confirmed with a breast biopsy.

Treatment with a steroid inhibitor (metyrapone) and tumor resection were again curative. The last disease relapse appeared 7 years after the initial treatment, with severe hypercortisolism treated with osilodrostat. There was a local recurrence in the mediastinum, and a thoracoscopic surgery was performed with good clinical and biochemical effect.

The patient remains under careful follow-up. Our case stays in accordance with recent literature data, showing that patients with thymic NETs are younger than previously considered and that the severity of hypercortisolism does not correlate with the tumor size. The symptoms of EAS associated with thymic NET may develop rapidly and may be severe as in our case. Nuclear medicine improves the effectiveness of the tumor search, which is crucial in successful EAS therapy. Our case also underlines the need for lifelong monitoring of patients with thymic NETs and EAS.

1 Introduction

Ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion (EAS) represents between 9% and 18% of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent Cushing’s syndrome (CS) cases (1–3). The tumors secreting ACTH may occur in many locations and present with different histopathological differentiation, resulting in various clinical outcomes. In the past, most of the EAS cases were associated with small cell lung cancer, characterized by rapid tumor progression and unfavorable prognosis. Recently, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) from the foregut prevail in the clinical series of EAS, with most common locations in the lungs, thymus, and pancreas (1).

EAS is often associated with severe hypercortisolism. Typical Cushing’s appearance may not be present due to the rapid onset of the disease. Patients with this type of hypercortisolism need urgent treatment because they have the highest mortality of all forms of CS (4). A retrospective review of 43 patients with EAS reported deaths in 27 patients (62.8%) and a median overall survival of 32.2 months. The leading causes of mortality were the progression of primary malignancies and systemic infections; two patients died from pulmonary embolism (5).

Prompt surgical removal of the tumor secreting ACTH is the mainstay of the therapy. However, finding the tumor causing EAS can be challenging due to its small size and variety of locations. Most authors recommend a combination of computed tomography (CT) scanning of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary, as the first-line examinations (1, 6, 7). However, the sensitivity of standard imaging modalities is suboptimal (8). In the analysis of 231 patients with EAS, cross-sectional imaging revealed the source of ACTH in 52.4% of them at initial evaluation, and another 29% was found during follow-up or due to nuclear medicine functional imaging, while 18.6% remained occult (9). Nuclear medicine improves the sensitivity of conventional radiology in the case of EAS, with the use of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) expected to be useful in identifying EAS tumors with high proliferative activity and 68gallium-labeled somatostatin analogues (68Ga DOTA-TATE) PET/CT with the potential to detect NETs. In the head-to-head comparison, the detection rate of the source of EAS was 75% for 68Ga DOTA-TATE and 60% for 18F-FDG PET/CT, while the highest sensitivity (90%) was achieved when both methods were combined (10).

Thymic NETs comprise 2%–5% of all thymic neoplasms and may cause some paraneoplastic syndromes, with the most frequent being myasthenia gravis, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, and hypercortisolism (11). EAS associated with thymic NETs are rare, representing between 5% and 16% of EAS in published case series (1). Because of the rarity and heterogeneity of the disease, no evidence-based guidelines are available.

We present a case of a patient with thymic NET causing EAS, with metastasis to the breast after 5 years of post-surgical remission and another local recurrence 7 years after the first operation.

Our case is unique because thymic NETs causing EAS are known as an aggressive disease with a median recurrence time of 24 months after thymectomy (12). There are only a few cases described of metastases to the breast from thymic NETs causing EAS (13–16). Moreover, 68Ga-SSTR PET/CT was very helpful in detecting both primary and metastatic ectopic ACTH-secreting tumor, which underlines its role in the diagnostic workout of EAS.

2 Case description

A 32-year-old woman with no relevant medical history was admitted to the endocrinology department in April 2016 due to the rapid onset of symptoms: weight gain, hypertension, skin changes, and oligomenorrhoea.

The measurements at initial physical examination were as follows: body mass index (BMI)—29 kg/m2, blood pressure—180/90 mmHg, and heart rate—88/min. She had plethora, acne, moon face, buffalo hump, central obesity, many red striae in the abdominal area, and mild hirsutism. The baseline laboratory findings are presented in Table 1, with hypokalemia, diabetes, leukocytosis, high levels of serum cortisol, ACTH, and chromogranin A, and increased urine-free cortisol (UFC) secretion. There was no suppression of serum cortisol or UFC after a high-dose dexamethasone test. ACTH-dependent CS was diagnosed, and EAS was suspected. The patient’s family history was negative for endocrine diseases or genetic disorders.

Table 1

www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Laboratory results at diagnosis (April 2016).

The first-line cross-sectional imaging studies (chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT and MRI of the pituitary gland) did not reveal the source of ACTH. Only a symmetrical enlargement of adrenals was observed. 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT revealed an oval lesion in the anterior mediastinum (1.9 × 1.3 cm) with a subtle overexpression of somatostatin receptors (SUV max. 2.8, Figures 1A, B). The chest MRI confirmed a mass 1.5 × 2.0 × 2.5 cm, with high T2-weighted signal and high contrast enhancement, suggestive of NET. The patient was given ketoconazole (600 mg daily), spironolactone, potassium supplementation, antihypertensive drugs, and thromboembolic prophylaxis. In June 2016, thoracoscopic removal of the mediastinal tumor was performed. In the histopathological examination, the tumor was encapsulated, without evidence of invasion, and no lymph node metastases were described. The immunophenotype of the tumor was as follows: CgA (+), Syn (+), CKAE1+E3 (+) “dot-like”, S100 (-), calcitonin (-), EMA (+/-), Ki67 3% to 4% in hot spots, no necrosis, mitotic index 0/10HPF with conclusion: thymic NET—typical carcinoid (low-grade). The presence of paraganglioma was also taken into consideration, as such cases were described (17). However, the significant reaction with cytokeratin and lack of S100 protein expression made this diagnosis less probable.

Figure 1

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scans. (A, B) Before the first surgery (April 2016). (C, D) Before the second surgery (May 2021). (E, F) Before the third surgery (January 2023).

The postoperative morning serum cortisol concentration was below 5 µg/dL, indicating biochemical remission. The patient received hydrocortisone substitution for a month. The clinical signs of CS disappeared, and there was a normalization of UFC.

During 5 years of follow-up, the patient got pregnant and delivered a healthy child. Genetic counseling was performed, and no germline mutation of MEN1 gene was identified. Other clinical manifestations of MEN1 (like primary hyperparathyroidism and pituitary secreting tumors) were excluded.

In May 2021, the patient experienced a sudden recurrence of CS symptoms. The laboratory findings confirmed severe hypercortisolism (Table 2); therefore, treatment with steroid inhibitor metyrapone was administered. The patient tolerated only 750 mg daily; there were side effects (skin rash and tachycardia) with higher doses. The chest MRI revealed no recurrence in the location of the primary tumor, only a lesion in the right breast (1.2 × 1.0 × 1.1 cm) with atypical contrast enhancement. The 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT result showed a subtle overexpression of the tracer (SUV max 1.9) in the right breast (Figures 1C, D). Breast ultrasonography confirmed a hypoechogenic, hypervascular mass in the right breast, BIRADS 3/4, diagnosed as NET in the breast biopsy. The tumor was removed in July 2021 without complications. The histopathological samples were compared with the primary lesion, confirming the metastasis from thymic NET to the breast—tumor size 0.7 × 1.5 cm, clear surgical margins (8 mm) with Ki67 3% (NET G2), and no lymph node metastases. After the breast surgery, the cortisol levels normalized in blood and urine and the CS symptoms disappeared. 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT were performed, showing no pathological increase of radiotracer uptake in post-operative locations or mediastinal lymph nodes. The patient consulted with the oncology team, and no adjuvant therapy was recommended.

Table 2

www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Laboratory results during 7 years of observation.

The next recurrence of the disease occurred in February 2023, with the symptoms developing suddenly during a very short period (1 to 2 weeks), additionally with significant mental deterioration (concentration disorders, anxiety, severe mood swing). The laboratory findings confirmed excessive hypercortisolism (Table 2). The patient was given osilodrostat (the initial dose was 20 mg daily but later reduced to 10 mg daily for 2 weeks until surgery) and symptomatic treatment with good clinical and biochemical effect. The 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT result showed a slightly increased uptake of the tracer in the left mediastinum, between cervical vessels, 0.9 × 1.2 cm (Figures 1E, F)—probably a local recurrence. Thoracotomy was performed in February 2023, with subsequent clinical and biochemical improvement (Table 2). In the histopathological examination, mediastinal NET G1 was diagnosed, without necrosis, mitotic activity 0/2 mm2, immunophenotype CgA (+), CD56 (+), Ki 67 1%, CK AE1/AE3 (+), CD117 (+), p40 (-), TdT (-), PAX8 (-), and the presence of tumor cell embolism in the vessels. One metastatic lesion was found in the pericardium (the maximal dimension of the tissue was 13 mm, resected radically). Two metastatic lesions in the fat tissue were found (one tissue fragment from the mediastinum, max. 16 mm diameter, and the second tissue fragment was surrounding the jugular vein, max. diameter up to 40 mm, both resected radically). Two of the 10 resected lymph nodes had metastatic lesions: one from the area of the jugular vein, diameter 11 mm, with capsular invasion, and the second lymph node N2R with capsular invasion, both resected radically. The symptoms of hypercortisolism disappeared, and the cortisol values were normalized after the operation. The patient is currently under careful monitoring, without signs of clinical or biochemical recurrence. 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT is performed every 6 months.

3 Discussion

Our case is representative for thymic NETs causing EAS presented in literature, but it also shows some distinct features, giving new insight into this rare condition.

In recent series, ACTH-secreting thymic NETs occurred often in young adults, like our patient. The typical age of presentation is 21–35 years in the largest case series, and 7.4% were children under 15 years (12, 13). In contrast, the former series of thymic NETs showed a peak incidence in the sixth decade of life (11).

ACTH-secreting thymic NETs show a slight male preponderance (58.6%); however, the patient’s gender does not seem to relate with the disease outcome (12). There was only an association between male sex and larger tumor size preoperatively as found in one case series (13).

Thymic NETs causing EAS are very rarely associated with MEN1; we have also excluded it in our patient. On the contrary, 30% of thymic NETs not associated with CS are found in patients with MEN1, mostly male smokers (18). It is not clear why thymic NETs with EAS are less likely caused by MEN1 gene mutation, but the possibility of this genetic predisposition should always be taken into consideration.

Thymic NETs associated with EAS are generally considered aggressive, presenting significant cellular atypia in the histopathological examination (19). However, the biology of the tumors is variable. In the histopathological examination of 92 thymic NETs secreting ACTH, the most common subtype was atypical NET (46.7%), while 30.4% of the cases were typical NETs and 21.7% were carcinomas, with the median Ki-67 10%, ranging from 1% to 40%. The median tumor size among 112 patients was 4.7 cm, ranging from 1 to 20 cm, and 55.7% of patients had metastases at presentation (12). It proves the significant heterogeneity of the disease.

Our patient had typical NET with small dimensions and localized disease at the time of diagnosis. Despite this, we observed aggressive Cushing’s syndrome with a short duration of symptoms and life-threatening hypokalemia. It has been observed that there is no correlation between tumor size and hormone levels (12). Thymic NETs associated with EAS are often large, which simplifies the diagnosis and localization. However, in the case of incidental sellar mass or small thymic tumor, the differential diagnosis might be difficult. The highest sensitivity in distinguishing thymic EAS from Cushing’s disease was documented in inferior petrosal sinus sampling and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation test (12, 20).

In severe cases, when small ACTH-secreting NET needs to be found urgently, PET/CT is a very helpful diagnostic tool. In a prospective study comprising 20 patients with histologically proven EAS, the 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT result correctly identified the tumor in 75%, with SUV max. ranging from 1.4 to 20.7, while the 18F-FDG PET/CT findings had a slightly worse result (identified 60% tumors), with SUV max. ranging from 1.8 to 10.0. Those methods are believed to be complementary in case of localization and discrimination of EAS. The 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT result revealed tumor in six cases with a negative 18F-FDG PET/CT result, while the 18F-FDG PET/CT procedure was diagnostic in three cases with a negative 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake; the combined sensitivity of both methods was 90% (10). The typical first-line diagnostic modalities’ (CT and MRI) sensitivities range from 52% to 66% (9). Our case remains in accordance with those results, showing difficulties in localizing the ACTH source in first-line radiological methods and with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT being the most useful diagnostic tool. It should also be noted that the 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake was only mildly elevated both in primary tumor and its recurrences despite excessive hormonal activity. We did not perform 18F-FDG PET/CT until second operation, as it was believed to be rather helpful in poorly differentiated tumors and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was diagnostic. Later, we performed it in search for other metastatic tumors, but the examination showed no tumor spread.

The recommended treatment of thymic NETs regarded radically resectable is thymectomy by median sternotomy or thoracotomy and lymph node dissection (11, 21, 22). According to the last version of the ESMO Guidelines, available literature suggests no benefit from adjuvant therapy in ThCs. The majority of the authors of the Guidelines panel suggest individually discussing eventual postoperative therapies, including RT and/or systemic therapies, balancing the pros and cons only in selected patients with advanced stage R0 or R1-2 resection (22). Data on systemic therapies in thymic NETs are scarce; therefore, they should be discussed in a multidisciplinary expert team in case of morphologically progressive tumors, high tumor burden, or refractory hormonal syndromes. Somatostatin analogs are recommended as the first-line systemic therapy in typical carcinoids (22). We considered the adjuvant therapy with somatostatin analogs; however, due to the low uptake in PET examination and complete resolution of symptoms as well as the radical type of surgical removal, we did not decide to initiate such therapy. Other systemic treatment options include everolimus (second line in typical carcinoids or first line in atypical carcinoids), chemotherapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and interferon-α (22, 23). There is also data on the benefits of combining long-acting lanreotide with temozolomide in progressive thymic NETs (24).

Due to the variable availability of steroid inhibitors during the course of the disease, our patient received three different preparations at each disease relapse. Both ketoconazole and osilodrostat were well tolerated and reduced the hypercortisolism within a few days, but metyrapone caused significant side effects (see below—”Patient’s perspective”), and it was not possible to normalize the cortisol values with this steroid inhibitor. It is worth noting that when using the most recent steroid inhibitor—osilodrostat—we initiated the therapy with a high dose without a previous dose titration. This strategy might be used in the case of severe hypercortisolism and proved effective and safe in our patient (25).

Most commonly, metastases from thymic NET producing ACTH are localized in lymph nodes, bone, lung, pleura, and, less commonly, liver and parotid gland (13). There are very few cases of EAS-related thymic NETs with breast metastases described in the literature, with some histopathological variability (one case related to atypical carcinoid, another to combined large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and atypical carcinoid, and third case of neuroendocrine carcinoma). All of them were female patients between 24 and 36 years of age, with mediastinal lymph nodes metastases at the time of presentation; one also had distant metastases to the bones (13–15). Contrary to the reported cases, our patient had typical carcinoid (confirmed by three independent pathologists from different centers) but similarly presented with severe hypercortisolism. It suggests that there is no connection between tumor differentiation and the severity of hypercortisolism. Interestingly, in a review of 661 patients with metastatic NETs from Sweden, there were 20 patients with NETs and breast metastases, and among them only one case of thymic NET (Ki 67 12%), but without EAS. A total of 11 patients with breast metastases had a primary tumor in the small intestine and eight in the lung (16).

Our case underlines the necessity of long-term follow-up in EAS, as the recurrences occurred 5 and 7 years after the initial successful treatment. According to guidelines, follow-up after treatment of thymic NETs should be life-long (22).

The strength of our report is the presentation of a thymic NET with metastasis to the breast, diagnosed and treated with many currently available tools and with a long period of follow-up. The limitation is the low number of other similar cases to compare, which is a consequence of the rarity of this disease.

In conclusion, our case proves that thymic NETs with EAS might present in young patients with well-differentiated character in histopathological examination and severe, life-threatening hypercortisolism despite the small size of the primary lesion. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is a very helpful tool to localize the tumor. Finally, life-long follow-up should be performed despite complete remission after surgery.

4 Patient’s perspective

The first symptoms that I observed were face edema and mood changes. I rapidly lost muscle mass (approximately 6 kg in 2 weeks), and I was not able to climb stairs, especially with my child’s pram. The most difficult to accept were changes in my appearances—hirsutism, losing hair, changes of my facial features. My sense of pain (for example, during medical procedures) was diminished. Other disruptive symptoms were intensive sweating, increased appetite, thirst, brain fog, and digestive problems. At every relapse, the disease manifestations were fluctuating, all of them intensifying at the same time, which was very difficult for me. Also stress evoked disease symptoms. I experienced a strange feeling of warm during cortisol outbursts.

As for the treatment, I did not tolerate metyrapone well. I had skin rash, anxiety attacks with heart palpitations, and a metallic taste in my mouth. Other drugs (ketoconazole, osilodrostat) were better for me.

After operations of the relapses, the symptoms diminished very quickly, especially the most difficult ones. My blood pressure and glycemia normalized within a few days. Other manifestations, like loss of hair or skin changes, persisted up to 3 months.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because the data are potentially identifiable. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to Aleksandra Zdrojowy-Wełna, aleksandra.zdrojowy-welna@umw.edu.pl.

Ethics statement

This study was exempt from ethical approval procedures being a case report of a single patient who has voluntarily provided oral and written consent to participate in the study and to have her case published for the sake of helping us better understand the clinical picture and the course of thymic neuroendocrine tumors with EAS and share it with the medical community for awareness about it. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

AZ-W: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. MB: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JS: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. AJ-P: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JK-P: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Barbara Górnicka and Prof. Michał Jeleń for their collaboration throughout the patient’s treatment.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The handling editor AJ declared a past co-authorship with the author MB.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

 

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1492187/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Young J, Haissaguerre M, Viera-Pinto O, Chabre O, Baudin E, Tabarin A. Management of endocrine disease: Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic ACTH secretion: an expert operational opinion. Eur J Endocrinol. (2020) 182:29–58. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0877

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Feelders R, Sharma S, Nieman L. Cushing`s syndrome: epidemiology and developments in disease management. Clin Epidemiol. (2015) 7:281–93. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S44336

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet Lond Engl. (2015) 386:913–27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61375-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Javanmard P, Duan D, Geer EB. Mortality in patients with endogenous cushing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. (2018) 47:313–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2018.02.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ejaz S, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Busaidy NL, Hu MI, Waguespack SG, Jimenez C, et al. Cushing syndrome secondary to ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion: the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience. Cancer. (2011) 117:4381–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.v117.19

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Sookur PA, Sahdev A, Rockall AG, Isidori AM, Monson JP, Grossman AB, et al. Imaging in covert ectopic ACTH secretion: a CT pictorial review. Eur Radiol. (2009) 19:1069–78. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1274-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Yogi-Morren D, Habra MA, Faiman C, Bena J, Hatipoglu B, Kennedy L, et al. Pituitary MRI findings in patients with pituitary and ectopic ACTH-dependent cushing syndrome: does A 6- mm pituitary tumor size cut-off value exclude ectopic acth syndrome? Endocr Pract. (2015) 21:1098–103. doi: 10.4158/EP15662.OR

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ilias I, Torpy DJ, Pacak K, Mullen N, Wesley RA, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion: twenty years’ Experience at the national institutes of health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2005) 90:4955–62. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2527

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Isidori AM, Sbardella E, Zatelli MC, Boschetti M, Vitale G, Colao A, et al. Conventional and nuclear medicine imaging in ectopic cushing’s syndrome: A systematic review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2015) 100:3231–44. doi: 10.1210/JC.2015-1589

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Liu Q, Zang J, Yang Y, Ling Q, Wu H, Wang P, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga- DOTATATE PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in localizing tumors with ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion: a prospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2021) 48:4386–95. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05370-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gaur P, Leary C, Yao JC. Thymic neuroendocrine tumors: a SEER database analysis of 160 patients. Ann Surg. (2010) 251:1117–21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dd4ec4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Guerrero-Pérez F, Peiró I, Marengo AP, Teulé A, Ruffinelli JC, Llatjos R, et al. Ectopic Cushing’s syndrome due to thymic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. (2021) 22:1041–56. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09660-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Neary NM, Lopez-Chavez A, Abel BS, Boyce AM, Schaub N, Kwong K, et al. Neuroendocrine ACTH-producing tumor of the thymus—Experience with 12 patients over 25 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2012) 97:2223–30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3355

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Dzialach L, Wojciechowska-Luzniak A, Maksymowicz M, Witek P. Case report: A challenging case of severe Cushing’s syndrome in the course of metastatic thymic neuroendocrine carcinoma with a synchronous adrenal tumor. Front Endocrinol. (2024). doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1399930/full

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Gaur S, Ayyappan AP, Nahleh Z. Breast metastases from an adrenocorticotropic hormone secreting thymic neuro-endocrine tumor. Breast Dis. (2013) 34:81–6. doi: 10.3233/BD-130354

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Crona J, Granberg D, Norlén O, Wärnberg F, Stålberg P, Hellman P, et al. Metastases from neuroendocrine tumors to the breast are more common than previously thought. A diagnostic pitfall? World J Surg. (2013) 37:1701–6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2037-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Li B, Yan Z, Huang H. Case report: an unusual case of ectopic ACTH syndrome caused by mediastinal paraganglioma. Front Endocrinol. (2021) 12:790975. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.790975

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ferolla P, Falchetti A, Filosso P, Tomassetti P, Tamburrano G, Avenia N, et al. Thymic neuroendocrine carcinoma (carcinoid) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome: the Italian series. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2005) 90:2603–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1155

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Moran CA, Suster S. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (Carcinoid tumor) of the thymus. Am J Clin Pathol. (2000) 114:100–10. doi: 10.1309/3PDN-PMT5-EQTM-H0CD

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Kakade HR, Kasaliwal R, Jagtap VS, Bukan A, Budyal SR, Khare S, et al. Ectopic acth- secreting syndrome: A single-center experience. Endocr Pract. (2013) 19:1007–14. doi: 10.4158/EP13171.OR

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Girard N. Neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus: the oncologist point of view. J Thorac Dis. (2017) 9:1491–500. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.18

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Baudin E, Caplin M, Garcia-Carbonero R, Fazio N, Ferolla P, Filosso PL, et al. Lung and thymic carcinoids: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. (2021) 32:439–51. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.01.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Ferolla P, Brizzi MP, Meyer T, Mansoor W, Mazieres J, Do Cao C, et al. Efficacy and safety of long-acting pasireotide or everolimus alone or in combination in patients with advanced carcinoids of the lung and thymus (LUNA): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. (2017) 18:1652–64. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30681-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Ferolla P, Berruti A, Spada F, Brizzi MP, Ibrahim T, Marconcini R, et al. Efficacy and safety of lanreotide autogel and temozolomide combination therapy in progressive thoracic neuroendocrine tumors (Carcinoid): results from the phase 2 ATLANT study. Neuroendocrinology. (2023) 113:332–42. doi: 10.1159/000526811

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Fleseriu M, Biller BMK. Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome with osilodrostat: practical applications of recent studies with case examples. Pituitary. (2022) 25:795–809. doi: 10.1007/s11102-022-01268-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ectopic Cushing`s syndrome, thymic neuroendocrine tumor, thymic NET, ectopic ACTH secretion, case report

Citation: Zdrojowy-Wełna A, Bolanowski M, Syrycka J, Jawiarczyk-Przybyłowska A and Kuliczkowska-Płaksej J (2025) Case Report: Thymic neuroendocrine tumor with metastasis to the breast causing ectopic Cushing’s syndrome. Front. Oncol. 15:1492187. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1492187

Received: 11 September 2024; Accepted: 31 January 2025;
Published: 25 February 2025.

Edited by:

Aleksandra Gilis-Januszewska, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Poland

Reviewed by:

Piero Ferolla, Umbria Regional Cancer Network, Italy
Lukasz Dzialach, Warsaw Medical University, Poland

Copyright © 2025 Zdrojowy-Wełna, Bolanowski, Syrycka, Jawiarczyk-Przybyłowska and Kuliczkowska-Płaksej. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Aleksandra Zdrojowy-Wełna, aleksandra.zdrojowy-welna@umw.edu.pl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.

Find out more

People also looked at

Supplementary Material
  • Data Sheet 1.pdf

Filed under: Cushing | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Next Page »