Sterotherapeutics Announces First Patient Dosed in Phase 2 Clinical Trial Evaluating ST-002 for Cushing’s Syndrome

DOYLESTOWN, Pa., June 24, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Sterotherapeutics LLC, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on rare endocrine diseases, today announced that the first patient has been successfully dosed in its ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating ST-002 for the treatment of Cushing’s Syndrome.

This milestone follows the successful Investigator Meeting held earlier this year in Athens, Greece, marking the official trial activation. The multicenter European study is designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of ST-002, a novel therapeutic candidate for patients suffering from Cushing’s Syndrome — a rare, debilitating condition caused by chronic exposure to excess cortisol.

“We are pleased to announce the dosing of the first patient in our Phase 2 trial of ST-002,” said Dr. Manohar Katakam, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of Sterotherapeutics. “This achievement is a testament to the dedication of our clinical teams and the commitment of our investigators. ST-002 has the potential to change the treatment landscape for patients who currently have limited therapeutic options.”

Cushing’s Syndrome can lead to serious complications including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD). With no universally effective treatment available, the initiation of patient dosing marks a critical advancement toward addressing this high unmet medical need.

“Our teams have worked diligently to reach this important moment,” added Dr. Constantine Stratakis, MD, PhD, Executive Medical Director of Sterotherapeutics and Professor of Pediatrics, Endocrinology and Genetics. “We remain focused on generating high-quality data that will inform the future development of ST-002 and provide hope for patients living with this challenging disorder and its associated complications, including diabetes and MASLD, the latter being assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and targeted measurements in our clinical study”

The trial is being conducted across multiple sites, with additional sites expected to open in the coming months. ST-002 has previously received Orphan Drug Designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), reinforcing its potential value for patients with rare diseases and enabling regulatory incentives for development.

For more information about the trial or to inquire about participation, please contact: info@sterotx.com

About Sterotherapeutics:

Sterotherapeutics, based in the USA, is a clinical-stage company dedicated to developing novel therapeutics for orphan diseases with significant unmet needs. The company’s lead programs, ST-002 for Cushing’s Syndrome and ST-003 for primary sclerosing cholangitis, have demonstrated strong preclinical and early clinical results, with favorable safety profiles and well-understood mechanisms of action. Both programs have received Orphan Drug Designation from the U.S. FDA. Learn more at www.sterotx.com

Postoperative Initiation of Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Cushing’s Disease (PIT-CD):

Abstract

Background

Pituitary surgical intervention remains the preferred treatment for Cushing’s disease (CD) while postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant risk. Whether to prescribe pharmacological thromboprophylaxis presents a clinical dilemma, balancing the benefit of reducing VTE risk with the potential for increasing hemorrhagic events in these patients. Currently, strong evidence and established protocols for routine pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in this population are lacking. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial is warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of combined pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis in reducing postoperative VTE risk in patients with CD.

Methods

This investigator-initiated, multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis compared to mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone in postoperative patients with CD. A total of 206 patients diagnosed with CD who will be undergoing transsphenoidal surgery will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either combined pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis (intervention) or mechanical thromboprophylaxis only (control). The primary outcome is the risk of VTE within 12 weeks following surgery.

Discussion

This trial represents a significant milestone in evaluating the efficacy of combined pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis in reducing VTE events in postoperative CD patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04486859, first registered on 22 July 2020.

Peer Review reports

Administrative information

Note: the numbers in curly brackets in this protocol refer to SPIRIT checklist item numbers. The order of the items has been modified to group similar items (see http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/spirit-2013-statement-defining-standard-protocol-items-for-clinical-trials/).

Title {1} Postoperative Initiation of Thromboprophylaxis in patients with Cushing’s Disease (PIT-CD): a randomized control trial
Trial registration {2a and 2b} ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04486859, first registered on 22 July 2020

WHO Trial Registration Data Set (Supplement)

Protocol version {3} Date: 1 July 2021, Version 5.0
Funding {4} The trial is supported by Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (SHDC2020CR2004A).
Author details {5a} Nidan Qiao, Min He, Zhao Ye, Wei Gong, Zengyi Ma, Yifei Yu, Zhenyu Wu, Lin Lu, Huijuan Zhu, Yong Yao, Zhihong Liao, Haijun Wang, Huiwen Tan, Bowen Cai, Yerong Yu, Ting Lei, Yan Yang, Changzhen Jiang, Xiaofang Yan, Yanying Guo, Yuan Chen, Hongying Ye, Yongfei Wang, Nicholas A. Tritos, Zhaoyun Zhang, Yao Zhao.
Name and contact information for the trial sponsor {5b} Investigator initiated trial, principal investigators, post-production correspondence:

Yao Zhao (YZ), Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 mid Wulumuqi Rd, Shanghai 200040, China. Email: zhaoyao@huashan.org.cn

Zhaoyun Zhang (ZZ), Department of Endocrinology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 mid Wulumuqi Rd, Shanghai 200040, China. Email: zhangzhaoyun@fudan.edu.cn

Role of sponsor {5c} The trial sponsor holds responsibility for all key elements of the trial’s execution, including its design, data collection, management, analysis, interpretation of results, and reporting. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board monitors data safety and participant protection to ensure the trial’s integrity and the safety of participants.

Introduction

Background and rationale {6a}

Cushing’s disease (CD) is characterized by hypercortisolism resulting from an adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma [1]. Tumor-directed surgical intervention remains the preferred treatment for this condition. Patients with Cushing’s disease commonly experience a hypercoagulable state due to activation of the coagulation system [2], suppression of anticoagulation and fibrinolytic pathways, and enhanced platelet activation, significantly increasing their risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Postoperative VTE risk is further exacerbated by factors such as intravenous medications, blood loss, and prolonged bed rest. Multiple studies report postoperative VTE risks in patients with CD ranging from 3 to 20% [2,3,4,5].

The Endocrine Society and Pituitary Society recommends considering perioperative thromboprophylaxis as a strategy to reduce VTE risk in patients with CD [16]. However, this recommendation was based on a single study that investigated perioperative prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with Cushing’s syndrome [7]. The study was limited by its small sample size, single-center nature, and retrospective design. Crucial details such as the optimal timing for initiation, choice of anticoagulant, and duration of therapy were not established. Recent surveys of European and US centers indicate that thromboprophylaxis protocols are not routinely employed, and there is considerable heterogeneity in prophylactic practices across centers [89].

The primary risk associated with thromboprophylaxis is postoperative hemorrhage. In patients with CD, although the risk of bleeding is significantly lower than after a typical craniotomy, complications such as intrasellar hemorrhage and nasal bleeding may still occur. Due to its retrospective nature, the aforementioned study cannot conclusively determine whether the benefits of thromboprophylaxis outweigh its risks. Consequently, guidelines from hematology and neurosurgical societies have concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to support a standardized VTE prophylaxis regimen for neurosurgical patients [10,11,12]. Nevertheless, both the American Society of Hematology and European guidelines suggest that a combination of pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis may be justified for higher-risk subgroups [1013].

Objectives {7}

Due to conflicting recommendations and lack of a definitive study to determine whether the benefits outweigh the risks regarding the use of pharmacological antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with CD following pituitary surgery, we initiated this study, called Postoperative Initiation of Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Cushing’s Disease (PIT-CD). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the combined use of pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis reduces VTE events compared to mechanical prophylaxis alone in postoperative CD patients.

Trial design {8}

Our hypothesis was that pharmacological prophylaxis in combination with intermittent pneumatic compression would be superior to intermittent pneumatic compression alone.

The PIT-CD study is an open-label, multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial with open-label treatment designed to assess the efficacy of combined pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis compared to mechanical prophylaxis alone. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The patient flow is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient flow

Methods: participants, interventions and outcomes

Study setting {9}

This study was initiated in tertiary centers across China with expertise in managing patients with CD. Currently, seven centers (see Supplements) are actively recruiting patients for the study.

Eligibility criteria {10}

Inclusion criteria

Patients are eligible for inclusion if they meet the following criteria:

  1. 1.Age between 18 and 65 years (inclusive)
  2. 2.Diagnosed with CD and scheduled to undergo transsphenoidal surgery
  3. 3.Either newly diagnosed or recurrent disease

A diagnosis of CD is confirmed based on the following criteria:

  1. A.Twenty-four-hour urine free cortisol > upper normal boundary and low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (overnight or over two days): serum cortisol > 1.8 µg/dL
  2. B.8 AM serum adrenocorticotropic hormone > 20 pg/mL
  3. C.High-dose dexamethasone suppression test: serum cortisol or 24-h urine cortisol suppression > 50%
  4. D.Inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) indicates elevated adrenocorticotropic hormone central gradient consistent with secretion from a central source

Patients are diagnosed with CD if both criteria A and B are met, in addition to either C or D. In patients with tumors smaller than 6 mm on MRI, IPSS indicating a central source is essential.

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded from the study if they meet any of the following criteria:

  1. 1.History of VTE before surgery or within 24 h post-surgery
  2. 2.Acute bacterial endocarditis
  3. 3.Major bleeding events within the previous 6 months
  4. 4.Thrombocytopenia
  5. 5.Active gastrointestinal ulcers
  6. 6.History of stroke
  7. 7.High risk of bleeding due to clotting abnormalities
  8. 8.Participation in other clinical trials within the last three months
  9. 9.Contraindications to rivaroxaban (e.g., renal dysfunction with eGFR < 50 mL/min)
  10. 10.Presence of malignant diseases
  11. 11.Severe mental or neurological disorders
  12. 12.Presence of intracranial vascular abnormalities
  13. 13.Contraindications to mechanical prophylactic anticoagulation
  14. 14.Pregnancy
  15. 15.Any other condition that researchers deem inappropriate for study participation (e.g., oral contraceptive use, history of thrombophilia)

Who will obtain informed consent? {26a}

Patients with CD are provided with detailed information about the clinical trial, including known and foreseeable risks and potential adverse events. Investigators are required to thoroughly explain these details to the patients or their guardians if the patients lack capacity to provide consent. Following a comprehensive explanation and discussion, both the patients or their guardians and the investigators sign and date the informed consent form.

Additional consent provisions for collection and use of participant data and biological specimens {26b}

N/A. Biological specimens are unnecessary in this trial. Participant data was not intended to be included in any other ancillary studies.

Interventions

Explanation for the choice of comparators {6b}

Participants in the control arm of the study will be required to use a limb compression system twice daily, for 30 min each session, from the 2nd to the 7th day post-surgery. The intermittent pneumatic compression devices are the standard of care in the prevention deep vein thrombosis in many literatures [1415].

Intervention description {11a}

Participants in the intervention arm of the study will be required to use the same limb compression system, also for 30 min twice daily from the 2nd to the 7th day post-surgery. Additionally, participants will receive subcutaneous injections of low molecular weight heparin (4000 IU) once daily from the 2nd to the 4th day post-surgery. Starting on the 5th day and continuing through the 28th day post-surgery, participants will take oral rivaroxaban tablets (10 mg) once daily.

Criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions {11b}

Participants have the right to withdraw their consent at any time without providing a reason, thereby terminating their participation in the study. Any withdrawal and the reasons, if known, will be documented. Criteria for premature termination include the following: occurrence of the primary outcome (patients will still be monitored for safety for 12 weeks), failure to meet inclusion criteria, fulfillment of exclusion criteria, or loss of contact.

Strategies to improve adherence to interventions {11c}

Several strategies will be employed to maintain adherence to interventions in this trial. Participants will receive thorough preoperative education on the importance of pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis in preventing VTE if they are assigned to the intervention arm or the importance of mechanical prophylaxis if they are assigned to the control arm. Detailed instructions on the use of the limb compression system and administration of rivaroxaban will be provided. Pill counts will be performed to document adherence in the intervention group.

Relevant concomitant care permitted or prohibited during the trial {11d}

N/A. Participants in both groups will receive treatment according to the current standard-of-care.

Provisions for post-trial care {30}

Participants experiencing adverse events will be followed until the events are resolved. Other participants will be regularly followed in accordance with clinical routine clinical practice. Participants in the trial are compensated in the event of trial-associated harms.

Outcomes {12}

Primary outcome

The primary outcome of the study is the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 12 weeks after surgery. VTE is defined as either deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), regardless of whether the cases are symptomatic or asymptomatic.

Secondary outcomes

The secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) risk of DVT within 12 weeks after surgery; (2) risk of PE within 12 weeks after surgery; (3) risk of symptomatic DVT, symptomatic PE, or symptomatic VTE within 12 weeks after surgery; (4) risk of VTE-associated mortality within 12 weeks after surgery; (5) risk of all-cause mortality within 12 weeks after surgery.

“Symptomatic” is defined as the presence of one or more of the following symptoms attributed to VTE: pain or swelling in the affected leg; chest pain, dyspnea, or decreased oxygen saturation.

Safety outcomes

Safety outcomes include the following: (1) major bleeding; (2) minor bleeding; (3) hemorrhage-associated surgery; (4) hemorrhage-associated readmission; (5) coagulation disorders (APTT or INR > 2.5 normal upper boundary); (6) thrombocytopenia; (7) increase in liver function tests.

Major bleeding is defined according to the Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [16]. This includes fatal bleeding; bleeding that is symptomatic and occurs in a critical area or organ; extrasurgical site bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 20 g/L or more, or leading to transfusion of two or more units of whole blood or red cells; surgical site bleeding that requires a second intervention.

Participant timeline {13}

A schema of all trial procedures and clinical visits is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments

Sample size {14}

Our estimates are based on a retrospective study examining the effects of preventive anticoagulation during the perioperative period in Cushing syndrome [7]. This study reported that the risk of postoperative VTE was lower in patients receiving preventive anticoagulants (6%) compared to those who did not (20%). Therefore, we assume that the risk of the primary outcome in the control group is 20%, while in the intervention group it is 5% within 12 weeks. Based on these assumptions, we calculated the required sample size for each group to be is 93 using PASS software, with an alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 0.9. Accounting for an estimated 10% dropout rate, the total number of patients required is 206.

Recruitment {15}

Clinical investigators will receive training on communicating with potential patients and their relatives, documenting screening logs, and other standard operating procedures during the kick-off meeting at each participating center. All centers will recruit patients competitively, and recruitment progress will be monitored to track the process. The estimated recruitment rate is 8 to 10 patients per month, with an expected recruitment period of 2 years.

Assignment of interventions: allocation

Sequence generation {16a}

The randomization procedure is computer- and web-based, and is stratified by age (≤ 35 years old vs. > 35 years old), sex (female vs. male) and disease duration (≤ 2 years vs. > 2 years).

Concealment mechanism {16b}

Participants are randomized using a web-based randomization system (edc.fudan.edu.cn). This system maintains allocation concealment by withholding the randomization code until screening is complete.

Implementation {16c}

Investigators will enroll participants, with the stratified block algorithms generating a random allocation sequence. Participant assignment through the randomization system is not subject to influence by the clinical investigators.

Assignment of interventions: blinding

Who will be blinded {17a}

This is an open-label trial, meaning that both the treating physicians and the participants are aware of the treatment allocation. However, a separate group of clinical outcome assessors (Clinical Event Committee, CEC), who are blinded to the treatment allocation, will determine the clinical outcomes. Similarly, lower limbs ultrasound and pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessments will be adjudicated by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) that is blinded to the treatment allocation. Statisticians remain blinded to treatment allocation prior to the final analysis, and the interim analyses will be conducted by a separate team from the one undertaking the final analysis.

Procedure for unblinding if needed {17b}

N/A. The design is open label.

Data collection and management

Plans for assessment and collection of outcomes {18a}

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) will be assessed using bilateral lower limb ultrasound. Asymptomatic participants will undergo evaluation at prespecified intervals (day 4, day 7, week 4, and week 12 post-intervention), while symptomatic individuals will receive immediate imaging upon presentation of clinical manifestations such as unilateral or bilateral lower extremity edema or pain. Pulmonary embolism (PE) screening will be performed via pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTA) at day 7 in asymptomatic cases, with expedited assessment triggered by acute symptoms (e.g., chest pain, dyspnea) or radiographic evidence of DVT detected during lower limb ultrasonography. These events will be adjudicated by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). A CEC will be convened to assess other outcomes.

Plans to promote participant retention and complete follow-up {18b}

The initial intervention for participants takes place during the patient’s inpatient stay, during which researchers will provide detailed information about the required procedures. Participants will undergo routine follow-up at 4 weeks and 12 weeks post-surgery, with VTE-related follow-up arranged during these routine visits. Transportation and examination expenses for follow-up visits are reimbursable.

Data of those who discontinue will also be documented.

Data management {19}

Data will be kept, both on paper and in electronic databases, for at least 5 years. Data will be entered by clinical investigators using electronic case report forms (eCRFs) on a web-based platform (http://crip-ec.shdc.org.cn). The investigators will be introduced to the platform and trained in data entry during the initial kick-off meeting before the recruitment of the first study participant. Access to the study database will be restricted to authorized clinical investigators, who will use a personal ID and password to gain entry.

Confidentiality {27}

When adding a new participant to the database, identifying data (e.g., Chinese name) are entered on a form that is printed but not saved on the server. On this form, participants will be represented by a unique ID. The printed form is kept in a locked space accessible only to the principal investigator and may be used to unblind personal data if necessary.

Plans for collection, laboratory evaluation and storage of biological specimens for genetic or molecular analysis in this trial/future use {33}

N/A. There will be no biological specimens collected.

Statistical methods

Statistical methods for primary and secondary outcomes {20a}

The primary analysis will be conducted on the full analysis data set, adhering to the intention-to-treat principle, which includes all patients randomized in the study. Generalized linear models (GLMs) with binomial distribution will be employed to analyze primary, secondary, and safety outcomes. Treatment effects for these outcomes will be quantified as risk differences (RDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additionally, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated using a logistic regression model, and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated using a Cox Proportional model.

Safety analyses will be based on all randomized patients who have received the study treatment. The risk and percentages of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be summarized by treatment group. Instances of subject death will be summarized and listed. All analyses will be performed using the SAS system, version 9.4.

Interim analyses {21b}

The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) plans to convene the interim analysis meeting after randomization and 12-week follow-up visits are completed for 103 participants. The significance level for interim analysis (primary outcome) is set at 0.001 according to the Haybittle–Peto boundary principle.

Based on these analyses, the DSMB will advise the steering committee on whether the randomized comparisons in this study have demonstrated a clear benefit of the intervention. If the p-values from the interim analysis for both groups are less than 0.001, recruitment will be halted, and the study will meet the criteria for early termination. If the p-values are greater than or equal to 0.001, recruitment will continue until the planned sample size is achieved, with the final analysis significance level set at 0.049.

Methods for additional analyses (e.g., subgroup analyses) {20b}

For both primary and secondary outcomes, pre-specified subgroup analyses will be conducted based on sex, age, disease duration, and magnitude of urine free cortisol elevation.​

Methods in analysis to handle protocol non-adherence and any statistical methods to handle missing data {20c}

The primary analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat data set, which includes all randomized patients and is based on the treatment arm to which they were assigned, regardless of the therapy they actually received. A per-protocol analysis will also be performed to account for non-adherence. If appropriate, multiple imputation will be used to address any missing data in the dataset. The prespecified statistical analysis plan (SAP), developed by independent biostatisticians blinded to treatment allocation, will be prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov prior to database lock.

Plans to give access to the full protocol, participant-level data and statistical code {31c}

The trial was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier NCT04486859. Updates to reflect significant protocol amendments will be submitted. The statistical analysis protocol will also be updated prior to database locking. The datasets and statistical code are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Oversight and monitoring

Composition of the coordinating centre and trial steering committee {5d}

The trial steering committee is composed of four Chinese experts and two international experts from outside of China. Investigators in participating centers are required to attend a training course during a kick-off event organized by the principal investigator. Each investigator must confirm that they have been properly introduced to trial-specific procedures. An IRC will adjudicate primary outcomes. An independent CEC will be responsible for ensuring high-quality outcomes and minimizing inconsistencies or bias in the clinical trial data.

Composition of the data monitoring committee, its role and reporting structure {21a}

The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) consists of three members, including one statistician. The DSMB will regularly receive blinded statistical reports and monitor serious adverse events throughout the trial to assess patient safety and determine if the trial should be terminated prematurely due to safety concerns.

An initial DSMB meeting will be conducted to ensure that DSMB members fully understand the research protocol, review and approve the DSMB charter, assess the monitoring plans for safety and efficacy data, and discuss the statistical methods, including stopping rules. A second DSMB meeting will be conducted to review the interim analysis. The interim analyses and the treatment allocation data will be provided by an independent trial statistician and provided confidentially to the DSMB chairman. An ad hoc DSMB meeting may be convened by either the principal investigators or the DSMB if imminent safety issues arise during the trial.

Adverse event reporting and harms {22}

Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) are defined according to the ICH GCP guidelines. All AEs and SAEs reported by study participants or observed by investigators within the study period must be documented in the eCRF and reported to the DSMB. Additionally, SAEs must be reported to the IRB.

Anticipated adverse events, including both major and minor bleeding events (e.g., epistaxis necessitating readmission), as well as coagulation disorders, thrombocytopenia, and elevated liver function tests, will be prospectively monitored in all trial participants. Unanticipated adverse events (not pre-specified in Section {12}) will be captured through spontaneous reporting. All adverse event data will be classified and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 to ensure consistency. For reporting, we will disclose all protocol-specified adverse events from Section {12}, alongside any unanticipated events higher than Grade 3.

Frequency and plans for auditing the trial conduct {23}

The trial conduct will be regularly audited to ensure compliance with the study protocol and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Audits will be conducted by independent monitors from Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Developing Centers. These audits will involve reviewing study documentation, informed consent forms, source data verification, and adherence to the protocol. Audits will also assess data entry accuracy and the overall management of the trial. The frequency of these audits will be determined based on the recruitment rate, safety concerns, and previous audit findings.

Plans for communicating important protocol amendments to relevant parties (e.g., trial participants, ethical committees) {25}

Any modifications to the study protocol will require protocol amendments, which will be promptly submitted for approval to the Institutional Review Board. These changes will only be implemented after receiving approval from the Institutional Review Board. Once approved, ClinicalTrials.gov will be updated to reflect any significant changes. If necessary, protocol training to implement the amendments will be provided by the study team to participating centers.

Dissemination plans {31a}

After database closure and data analysis, the trial statistician will prepare a report detailing the main study results. Following this, a meeting of the investigators will be convened to discuss the findings before drafting a scientific manuscript for peer review and publication in a major scientific journal. Additionally, efforts will be made to present the results at key international conferences of neuroendocrine societies.

Discussion

This trial represents a significant milestone in evaluating the efficacy of combined pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis in reducing VTE events in postoperative CD patients. To date, no similar randomized controlled trials have addressed this specific clinical question.

Transnasal transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection is the preferred surgical approach for patients with CD. Compared to craniotomy, transsphenoidal surgery has a significantly lower risk of bleeding. The published literature indicates a bleeding risk of 0.02% following transsphenoidal surgery [17], whereas the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage after craniotomy ranges from 1% to 1.5% [18]. Therefore, for clinical practicality and safety, this study will exclusively include patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection.

Early meta-analyses indicated that low molecular weight heparin is generally safer, with a relatively lower bleeding risk compared to rivaroxaban, particularly when used for thrombosis prevention after hip and knee replacement surgeries [19]. However, recent studies have shown that rivaroxaban may have no significant difference in major bleeding and non-major bleeding risks compared to enoxaparin in thromboprophylaxis following non-major orthopedic surgeries of the lower limbs [20]. Given the risk of postoperative bleeding and the potential bleeding side effects of oral medications, LMWH was chosen for initial postoperative treatment because of its relatively lower bleeding risk. As patients prepare for discharge, the more convenient oral medication was selected for ongoing prophylaxis.

Patients who develop early VTE on the first day after surgery or despite anticoagulant use will be included in a further post hoc analysis. This will help identify risk factors for VTE. This analysis will aim to determine why VTE occurred despite anticoagulant use and explore whether specific factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, body mass index, or disease duration, are associated with increased risk. Based on our findings, recommendations may include earlier initiation of prophylaxis, dosage adjustments, or extended duration of treatment for high-risk patients.

Trial status

This protocol is based on trial protocol version 5.0, dated July 1, 2021. The first patient was enrolled in December 2020, and the final patient is expected to be enrolled by the end of 2024. While the original plan anticipated completing recruitment by December 2022, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted many districts and cities in China, leading to lockdowns that have severely delayed the implementation and recruitment for this trial.

Data availability {29}

Data will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CD:
Cushing’s disease
VTE:
Venous thromboembolism
DVT:
Deep vein thrombosis
PE:
Pulmonary embolism
CEC:
Clinical events committee
IRC:
Independent Review Committee
CTA:
Computed tomography angiography
eCRFs:
Electronic case report forms
AE:
Adverse events
SAE:
Severe adverse events
DSMB:
Data Safety Monitoring Board

References

  1. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, Ben-Shlomo A, Bertherat J, Biermasz NR, et al. Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(12):847–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  2. Feelders RA, Nieman LK. Hypercoagulability in Cushing’s syndrome: incidence, pathogenesis and need for thromboprophylaxis protocols. Pituitary. 2022;25(5):746–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-022-01261-9.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  3. White AJ, Almeida JP, Filho LM, Oyem P, Obiri-Yeboah D, Yogi-Morren D, et al. Venous Thromboembolism and Prevention Strategies in Patients with Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg. 2024;S1878–8750(24):01460–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.090.

    Article Google Scholar

  4. Waqar M, Chadwick A, Kersey J, Horner D, Kearney T, Karabatsou K, et al. Venous thromboembolism chemical prophylaxis after endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery. Pituitary. 2022;25(2):267–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-021-01195-8.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wagner J, Langlois F, Lim DST, McCartney S, Fleseriu M. Hypercoagulability and Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events in Endogenous Cushing’s Syndrome: A Systematic Meta-Analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;9:805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00805.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Murad MH, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, et al. Treatment of Cushing’s Syndrome: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(8):2807–31. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-1818.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. Boscaro M, Sonino N, Scarda A, Barzon L, Fallo F, Sartori MT, et al. Anticoagulant prophylaxis markedly reduces thromboembolic complications in Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(8):3662–6. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.8.8703.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  8. White AJ, Almeida JP, Petitt JC, Yogi-Morren D, Recinos PF, Kshettry VR. Significant Variability in Postoperative Thromboprophylaxis in Cushing’s Disease Patients: A Survey of the North American Skull Base Society and the AANS/CNS Joint Tumor Section. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023;85(5):540–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772698.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  9. Isand K, Feelders R, Brue T, Toth M, Deutschbein T, Reincke M, et al. High prevalence of venous thrombotic events in Cushing’s syndrome: data from ERCUSYN and details in relation to surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2024;190(1):75–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad176.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Anderson DR, Morgano GP, Bennett C, Dentali F, Francis CW, Garcia DA, et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients. Blood Adv. 2019;3(23):3898–944. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000975.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  11. Nyquist P, Bautista C, Jichici D, Burns J, Chhangani S, DeFilippis M, et al. Prophylaxis of Venous Thrombosis in Neurocritical Care Patients: An Evidence-Based Guideline: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0221-y.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Raksin PB, Harrop JS, Anderson PA, Arnold PM, Chi JH, Dailey AT, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Prophylaxis and Treatment of Thromboembolic Events. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(1):E39–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy367.

From https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-025-08923-6

Challenges of Cushing’s Syndrome and Bariatric Surgery

Abstract

Cushing’s disease (CD), caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma, is challenging to diagnose, especially in obese patients post-bariatric surgery.

This report discusses a misdiagnosed case of CD in a 42-year-old obese male with hypertension. CD was suspected only after surgery, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a pituitary macroadenoma.

Despite transsphenoidal surgery and ketoconazole therapy, the patient suffered liver failure and died.

Among 20 CD reviewed cases in the literature, 65% were misdiagnosed. MRI and immunohistochemistry confirmed tumors, with 55% achieving remission post-surgery. Screening for CD before bariatric surgery may prevent mismanagement and complications.

Therapeutic Options for the Prevention of Thromboses in Cushing’s Syndrome

Abstract

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome, or hypercortisolism, occurs after prolonged exposure to excess cortisol, and can be characterized by moon facies, central fat redistribution, proximal limb muscle weakness and wasting, and abdominal striae. Medical literature points to a relationship between hypercortisolism and hypercoagulability, with higher rates of venous thromboembolism noted. Current guidelines recommend prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), but there is little evidence to support LMWH over other forms of anticoagulation.

Methods

We utilized TriNetX US Collaborative Network (TriNetX, LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) to investigate the efficacy of different forms of anticoagulation in patients with hypercortisolism, defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Adult patients with hypercortisolism and prescribed enoxaparin, a form of LMWH, were compared to patients with hypercortisolism prescribed unfractionated heparin, warfarin, apixaban, and aspirin at 81 mg. Groups were propensity-matched according to age at index event, sex, race, ethnicity, and comorbid conditions. The outcomes studied included pulmonary embolism (PE), upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UE DVT), lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LE DVT), superficial venous thrombosis (superficial VT), bleeding, transfusion, and all-cause mortality.

Results

No significant differences in outcomes were noted between enoxaparin and heparin, warfarin, or apixaban in patients with hypercortisolism of any cause. Uniquely, the enoxaparin cohort had significantly higher risk of PE, LE DVT, and all-cause mortality compared to the aspirin 81 mg cohort (PE: hazard ratio (HR) 1.697, 95%CI 1.444-1.994, p=0.0345; LE DVT: HR 1.492, 95%CI 1.28-1.738, p=0.0017; mortality: HR 1.272, 95%CI 1.167-1.386, p=0.0002). With further sub-analysis of pituitary-dependent (Cushing’s Disease), enoxaparin continued to demonstrate a higher risk for LE DVT (HR 1.677, 95%CI 1.353-2.079, p=0.0081), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.597, 95%CI 1.422-1.794, p=0.0005).

Conclusion

Although LMWH is currently recommended as the gold standard for anticoagulation in patients with hypercortisolism, our evidence suggests that low-dose antiplatelets such as aspirin 81 mg could outperform it. Further research is warranted to confirm and replicate our findings.

Introduction

Cortisol is produced within the zona fasciculata of the adrenal cortex and is typically released under stress [1]. Cushing’s Syndrome, first defined in 1912 by American neurosurgeon Harvey Cushing, is a state of prolonged hypercortisolism, presenting with classic phenotypic manifestations, including moon facies, central fat deposition, proximal limb muscle weakness and muscle wasting, and abdominal striae [2]. Cushing’s syndrome can be exogenous (medication-induced/iatrogenic) or endogenous (ectopic adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), pituitary-dependent, or adrenal adenoma/carcinoma) [3]. Pituitary adenomas causing ACTH-dependent cortisol excess account for 80% of endogenous cases of Cushing’s Syndrome and are more specifically termed Cushing’s Disease [4]. Overall, however, the most common cause of Cushing’s Syndrome is iatrogenic, from exogenous corticosteroid administration [5].

Hypercortisolism has also been demonstrated to affect coagulation, though the mechanism is unclear [6]. Both venous thromboemboli and pulmonary emboli rates are increased among these patients [7]. The Endocrine Society Guidelines for Treatment of Cushing Syndrome describe altered coagulation profiles that take up to one year to normalize [8]. As a result, limited guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation in Cushing syndrome; while low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the gold standard, there is little evidence behind this recommendation [9]. Furthermore, few studies assessed individual Cushing’s Syndrome subtypes and associated clotting risks or anticoagulation impact. It is currently unknown whether the antagonistic effects of cortisol will be augmented or hindered by anticoagulation other than LMWH.

This retrospective multicenter study aimed to address this paucity in data by analyzing differences among various forms of anticoagulation. Patients with Cushing syndrome who were on one of three common anticoagulants, or aspirin, were compared to patients with Cushing’s Syndrome on enoxaparin, an LMWH considered the gold standard for prophylaxis in this population. Primary objectives included end-points concerning thromboses (such as pulmonary embolism (PE), upper and lower extremity deep vein thromboses (DVTs), and superficial venous thrombosis (VT)). Secondary objectives included analyzing safety profiles (bleeding, transfusion requirements, and all-cause mortality).

Materials & Methods

Eligibility criteria

TriNetX Global Collaborative network (TriNetX, LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States), a nationwide database of de-identified health data across multiple large healthcare organizations (HCOs), was utilized to compile patients according to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes (Figure 1).

Flow-chart-for-inclusion-and-exclusion-criteria-for-the-study

ICD-10 codes included those related to Cushing’s Syndrome and one of five studied medications: enoxaparin, heparin, apixaban, warfarin, and aspirin, included in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. ICD-10 codes also included those related to outcomes, including PE, upper extremity (UE) DVT, lower extremity (LE) DVT, superficial VT, bleeding, transfusion, and all-cause mortality (Table 3). Measures of association involved calculating risk differences and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the proportion of patients experiencing each outcome across cohorts.

Cushing’s Syndrome Type ICD-10 Code
Cushing Syndrome (unspecified) Drug-Induced Cushing Syndrome (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.2)
Other Cushing Syndrome (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.8)
Cushing Syndrome, Unspecified (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.9)
Pituitary-Dependent Cushing Disease (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.0)
Cushing Syndrome (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24)
Ectopic ACTH Syndrome (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.3)
Cushing Syndrome (pituitary) Pituitary-Dependent Cushing Disease (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.0  )
Medication ICD-10 Code
Enoxaparin NLM:RXNORM:67108
Warfarin NLM:RXNORM:11289
Heparin NLM:RXNORM:5224
Apixaban NLM:RXNORM:1364430
Aspirin NLM:RXNORM:1191
Outcome ICD-10 Codes
Pulmonary Embolism Pulmonary Embolism UMLS:ICD10CM:I26
Upper Extremity DVT Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of unspecified upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.629
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of unspecified upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.729
Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.621
Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of left upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.622
Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of upper extremity, bilateral UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.623
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.721
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of left upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.722
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of upper extremity, bilateral UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.723
Lower Extremity DVT Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.409
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.509
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.50
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity, bilateral UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.503
Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.40
Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.402
Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.401
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.502
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.501
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of left femoral vein UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.512
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of right femoral vein UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.511
Acute embolism and thrombosis of right iliac vein UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.421
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of femoral vein, bilateral UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.513
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified distal lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.5Z9
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified tibial vein UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.549
Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.4
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.5
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of other specified deep vein of unspecified lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.599
Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified proximal lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.4Y9
Superficial VT Embolism and thrombosis of superficial veins of unspecified lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.819
Acute embolism and thrombosis of superficial veins of unspecified upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.619
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of superficial veins of unspecified upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.719
Bleeding Hematemesis UMLS:ICD10CM:K92.0
Hemoptysis UMLS:ICD10CM:R04.2
Hemorrhage from respiratory passages UMLS:ICD10CM:R04
Hemorrhage from other sites in respiratory passages UMLS:ICD10CM:R04.8
Hemorrhage from other sites in respiratory passages UMLS:ICD10CM:R04.89
Melena UMLS:ICD10CM:K92.1
Hemorrhage of anus and rectum UMLS:ICD10CM:K62.5
Epistaxis UMLS:ICD10CM:R04.0
Transfusion Transfusion of Nonautologous Whole Blood into Peripheral Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30233H1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Whole Blood into Central Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30243H1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Red Blood Cells into Peripheral Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30233N1
Transfusion, blood or blood components UMLS:CPT:36430
Transfusion of Nonautologous Red Blood Cells into Central Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30243N1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Frozen Red Cells into Peripheral Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30233P1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Red Blood Cells into Peripheral Artery, Percutaneous Approach (deprecated 2020) UMLS:ICD10PCS:30253N1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Frozen Red Cells into Central Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30243P1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Red Blood Cells into Central Artery, Percutaneous Approach (deprecated 2020) UMLS:ICD10PCS:30263N1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Frozen Red Cells into Peripheral Artery, Percutaneous Approach (deprecated 2020) UMLS:ICD10PCS:30253P1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Frozen Red Cells into Central Artery, Percutaneous Approach (deprecated 2020) UMLS:ICD10PCS:30263P1
Transfusion of blood product UMLS:SNOMED:116859006
Transfusion of red blood cells UMLS:SNOMED:116863004
Mortality Deceased Deceased (demographic)

Cohort definitions

For each medication listed, two cohorts were compared: (i) a cohort of patients with hypercortisolism on enoxaparin and (ii) a cohort of patients with hypercortisolism on heparin, warfarin, apixaban, or aspirin at 81 mg (Table 4). The cohorts strictly assessed only adult patients (defined as at least 18 years of age); pediatric patients were not analyzed.

Cohort Run
Enoxaparin 146 HCOs with 99 providers responding with 12,885 patients
Heparin 145 HCOs with 97 providers responding with 16,376 patients
Warfarin 145 HCOs with 82 providers responding with 3,230 patients
Apixaban 146 HCOs with 91 providers responding with 3,982 patients
Aspirin (81 mg) 144 HCOs with 51 providers responding with 8,200 patients

Statistical analysis

Index events and time windows were defined to analyze patient outcomes. The index event was defined as the first date a patient met the inclusion criteria for a cohort. The time window was defined as the five years after the index event during which a pre-defined outcome could occur. Outcomes of interest were identified using ICD-10 codes as outlined in Table 1, and included PE, UE DVT, LE DVT, superficial VT, bleeding, transfusion, and all-cause mortality. Cohorts were propensity score-matched 1:1 according to age at index event, sex, race and ethnicity, and comorbid conditions, including endocrine, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary conditions (Table 5). Propensity score-matching was performed using TriNetX, with a greedy (nearest) neighbor matching algorithm (caliper of 0.1 pooled standard deviations).

Variable ICD-10 Code
Demographics Age at Index (AI)
Female (F)
Black/African American (2054-5)
Male (M)
White (2106-3)
American Indian/Alaskan Native (1002-5)
Unknown Race (UNK)
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander (2076-8)
Unknown Gender (UN)
Not Hispanic/Latino (2186-5)
Hispanic/Latino (2135-2)
Other Race (2131-1)
Asian (2028-9)
Diagnosis Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (E00-E89)
Factors influencing health status and contact with health services (Z00-Z99)
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue (M00-M99)
Diseases of the circulatory system (I00-I99)
Diseases of the digestive system (K00-K95)
Diseases of the nervous system (G00-G99)
Diseases of the respiratory system (J00-J99)
Diseases of the genitourinary system (N00-N99)
Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism (D50-D89)
Neoplasms (C00-D49)
Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (L00-L99)

Three analytical approaches were performed for this study, including measures of association, survival analysis, and frequency analysis. The measure of association analysis involved calculating RRs (and risk differences) with 95%CIs, comparing the proportion of patients across each cohort experiencing an outcome. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier estimators (evaluating time-to-event outcomes), with Log-Rank testing incorporated to compare the survival curves. Furthermore, Cox proportional hazard models were incorporated to provide an estimate of the hazard ratios (HR) and 95%CIs. Patients who exited a cohort before the end of the time window were excluded from the survival analysis. The frequency analysis was performed by calculating the proportion of patients in each cohort who experienced an outcome during the defined period of five years.

For statistically significant associations, an E-value was calculated to assess the potential impact of unmeasured confounders, quantifying the minimum strength of association that would be required by an unmeasured confounder to explain the observed effect (beyond our measured covariates); an E-value of above 2.0 was considered modestly robust, and above 3 was considered strongly robust. Additionally, a limited sensitivity analysis assessing Pituitary Cushing’s (the most common cause of endogenous Cushing’s Syndrome) was performed. All analyses were conducted through TriNetX, with statistical significance defined as a p-value < 0.05.

Results

Cushing’s syndrome, unspecified

Enoxaparin and Heparin

After propensity-score matching, 8,658 patients were identified in each cohort. The average age at index event for the enoxaparin cohort was 54.5 + 16.5 years, compared to 53.1 + 17.3 years for the heparin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 6,216 females (71.8%), compared to 6,000 (69.3%) in the heparin cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 6035 (69.7%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 987 (11.4%) African American patients, 753 (8.7%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 216 (2.5%) Asian patients. The heparin cohort was similar in ethnicity, with 5,800 (67.0%) Caucasian patients, 1,099 (12.7%) African American patients, 753 (8.7%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 268 (3.1%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin and heparin cohorts demonstrated no significant differences in PE (HR 1.171, 95%CI 1.017-1.348, p=0.1797), UE DVT (HR 1.067, 95%CI 0.837-1.362, p=0.8051), LE DVT (HR 1.066, 95%CI 0.931-1.222, p=0.1922), superficial VT (HR 0.974, 95%CI 0.672-1.41, p=0.4576), bleeding (HR 0.948, 95%CI 0.855-1.05, p=0.3547), transfusion (HR 0.873, 95%CI 0.786-0.969, p=0.1767), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.036, 95%CI 0.966-1.11, p=0.9954). A comprehensive summary of the results is demonstrated in Table 6.

p-value Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT S VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 0.1797 0.8051 0.1922 0.4576 0.3547 0.1767 0.9954
enoxaparin warfarin 0.3828 0.6 0.1963 0.0995 0.7768 0.5715 0.15
enoxaparin apixaban 0.6491 0.6275 0.723 0.4198 0.4356 0.4299 0.2628
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 0.0345 0.587 0.0017 0.4218 0.246 0.2057 0.0002
HR Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT S VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 1.171 1.067 1.066 0.974 0.948 0.873 1.036
enoxaparin warfarin 0.936 0.969 0.708 0.655 0.961 1.127 1.042
enoxaparin apixaban 0.798 0.666 0.684 4.059 0.933 1.089 1.041
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 1.697 1.398 1.492 1.718 1.107 1.347 1.272
95% CIs Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT Superficial VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 1.017-1.348 0.837-1.362 0.931-1.222 0.672-1.41 0.855-1.05 0.786-0.969 0.966-1.11
enoxaparin warfarin 0.755-1.161 0.692-1.356 0.583-0.859 0.376-1.142 0.812-1.137 0.95-1.336 0.93-1.167
enoxaparin apixaban 0.608-1.047 0.431-1.03 0.593-0.788 1.156-14.258 0.771-1.129 0.892-1.33 0.912-1.189
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 1.444-1.994 1.06-1.845 1.28-1.738 1.011-2.92 0.986-1.243 1.185-1.532 1.167-1.386

Enoxaparin and Warfarin

After propensity-score matching, 2,786 patients were identified in each cohort. The average age at index event for the enoxaparin cohort was 54.8 + 16.4 years, compared to 58.9 + 15.9 years for the warfarin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 2,020 female patients (72.5%) compared to 1,861 (66.8%) in the warfarin cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 2,000 (71.8%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 334 (12.0%) African American patients, 220 (7.98%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 64 (2.3%) Asian patients. The warfarin cohort was similar, with 2,056 (73.8%) Caucasian patients, 312 (11.2%) African American patients, 170 (6.1%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 92 (3.3%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin and warfarin cohorts demonstrated no significant differences in PE (HR 0.936, 95%CI 0.755-1.161, p=0.3828), UE DVT (HR 0.969, 95%CI 0.692-1.356, p=0.6), LE DVT (HR 0.708, 95%CI 0.583-0.859, p=0.1963), superficial VT (HR 0.655, 95%CI 0.376-1.142, p=0.0995), bleeding (HR 0.961, 95%CI 0.812-1.137, p=0.7768), transfusion (HR 1.127, 95%CI 0.95-1.336, p=0.5715), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.042, 95%CI 0.93-1.167, p=0.15) (Table 6).

Enoxaparin and Apixaban

After propensity-score matching, 2,429 patients were identified in each cohort. The average age at index event for the enoxaparin cohort was 54.6 + 16.4 years, compared to 61.2 + 15.2 years for the apixaban cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 1,746 female patients (71.9%) compared to 1,571 (64.7%) in the apixaban cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 1632 (67.2%) were Caucasian patients, 318 (13.1%) African American patients, 219 (9.0%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 68 (2.8%) Asian patients. A similar composition was noted in the apixaban cohort, with 1,683 (69.3%) Caucasian patients, 321 (13.2%) African American patients, 141 (5.8%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 53 (2.2%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin and apixaban cohorts demonstrated no significant differences in PE (HR 0.798, 95%CI 0.608-1.047, p=0.6491), UE DVT (HR 0.666, 95%CI 0.431-1.03, p=0.6275), LE DVT (HR 0.684, 95%CI 0.593-0.788, p=0.723), superficial VT (HR 4.059, 95%CI 1.156-14.258, p=0.4198), bleeding (HR 0.933, 95%CI 0.771-1.129, p=0.4356), transfusion (HR 1.089, 95%CI 0.892-1.33, p=0.4299), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.041, 95%CI 0.912-1.189, p=0.2628) (Table 6).

Enoxaparin and Aspirin 81 mg

After propensity-score matching, 6,433 patients were identified in each cohort. The average age at index event for the enoxaparin cohort was 54.5 + 16.6 years, compared to the aspirin 81 mg cohort at 58.8 + 14.9 years. The enoxaparin cohort had 4664 female patients (72.5%) compared to 4,445 (69.1%) in the aspirin 81 mg cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 4,522 (70.3%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 766 (11.9%) African American patients, 521 (8.1%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 193 (3.0%) Asian patients. Similar demographics were noted within the Aspirin 81 mg cohort, with 4,670 (72.6%) Caucasian patients, 817 (12.7%) African American patients, 425 (6.6%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 167 (2.6%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin cohort demonstrated a significantly higher risk of PE (HR 1.697, 95%CI 1.444-1.994, p=0.0345), LE DVT (HR 1.492, 95%CI 1.28-1.738, p=0.0017), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.272, 95%CI 1.167-1.386, p=0.0002) compared to the aspirin 81 mg cohort (Figure 2). There was no significant difference in rates of UE DVT (HR 1.398, 95%CI 1.06-1.845, p=0.587), superficial VT (HR 1.718, 95%CI 1.011-2.92, p=0.4268), bleeding (HR 1.107, 95%CI 0.986-1.243, p=0.246), or transfusion (HR 1.347, 95%CI 1.185-1.532, p=0.2057) (Table 6). Due to a significant difference between enoxaparin and Aspirin 81 mg, an E-value was calculated for PE (E-value = 2.783), LE DVT (E-value = 2.348), and all-cause mortality (E-value = 1.860).

Kaplan-Meier-survival-curve-for-pituitary-Cushing's-subtype-(mortality,-LE-DVT,-and-PE)

Pituitary hypercortisolism (Cushing’s disease)

Enoxaparin and Heparin

Propensity-score matching identified 5,602 patients per cohort. The average age at index for the enoxaparin cohort was 53.9 + 16.7 years, compared to 53.7 + 16.9 years in the heparin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 4,088 female patients (72.97%) compared to 4,066 (72.58%) in the heparin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort was predominantly Caucasian patients (n=3,948; 70.47%), followed by 641 (11.45%) African American patients, 424 (7.57%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 139 (2.48%) Asian patients. The heparin cohort was also predominantly Caucasian (n=3,947; 70.46%), followed by 669 (11.94%) African American patients, 401 (7.16%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 148 (2.64%) Asian patients. There were no significant differences in rates of PE (HR 1.208, 95%CI 1.007 – 1.451, p=0.5803), UE DVT (HR 1.156, 95%CI 0.841 – 1.59, p=0.6863), LE DVT (HR 1.246, 95%CI 1.063 – 1.46, p=0.8996), superficial VT (HR 1.347, 95%CI 0.874 – 2.075, p=0.3731), bleeding (HR 0.916, 95%CI 0.809 – 1.037, p=0.1578), transfusion (HR 0.912, 95%CI 0.798 – 1.042, p=2119), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.935 – 1.112, p=0.8734). A comprehensive summary of the results is demonstrated in Table 7.

p-value Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT Superficial VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 0.5189 0.2468 0.7586 0.7708 0.5894 0.6273 0.8433
enoxaparin warfarin 0.4842 0.7763 0.9651 0.682 0.1996 0.5309 0.399
enoxaparin apixaban 0.1047 0.0423 0.647 0.4824 0.2698 0.1122 0.1044
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 0.9651 0.6358 0.8448 0.9765 0.1167 0.4854 0.5001
HR Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT Superficial VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 1.186 1.332 1.232 1.183 0.876 0.963 1.016
enoxaparin warfarin 0.804 0.76 0.688 0.815 1.008 1.009 0.976
enoxaparin apixaban 0.875 0.761 0.954 3.068 1.084 1.359 1.115
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 1.173 1.157 1.226 1.165 0.908 0.915 1.028
95% CIs Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT Superficial VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 0.983-1.433 0.941-1.885 1.032-1.47 0.776-1.803 0.769-0.998 0.808-1.147 0.929-1.112
enoxaparin warfarin 0.612-1.055 0.467-1.235 0.539-0.877 0.447-1.489 0.816-1.246 0.76-1.34 0.843-1.13
enoxaparin apixaban 0.659-1.162 0.456-1.271 0.736-1.236 0.843-11.166 0.845-1.381 0.962-1.921 0.944-1.317
enoxaparin aspirin 81mg 0.969-1.419 0.827-1.619 1.03-1.46 0.763-1.78 0.797-1.035 0.772-1.085 0.938-1.127

Enoxaparin and Warfarin

Propensity-score matching was performed with 1,694 patients per cohort identified. The average age at index for the enoxaparin cohort was 58.1 + 15.8 years, compared to 58.1 + 15.9 years in the warfarin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 1,142 female patients (67.41%) compared to 1,143 (67.47%) in the warfarin cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 1,224 (72.2%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 194 (11.45%) African American patients, 97 (5.73%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 57 (3.37%) Asian patients. The warfarin cohort had similar demographics, with 1,223 (72.2%) Caucasian patients, followed by 194 (11.45%) African American patients, 102 (6.02%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 65 (3.84%) Asian patients. There were no significant differences in rates of PE (HR 0.907, 95%CI 0.694 – 1.186, p=0.8117), UE DVT (HR 0.988, 95%CI 0.628 – 1.555, p=0.9848), LE DVT (HR 0.739, 95%CI 0.589 – 0.929, p=0.4445), superficial VT (HR 0.815, 95%CI 0.44 – 1.511, p=0.8098), bleeding (HR 1.001, 95%CI 0.814 – 1.231, p=0.0987), transfusion (HR 1.106, 95%CI 0.889 – 1.376, p=0.4904), or all-cause mortality (HR 0.951, 95%CI 0.83 – 1.089, p=0.1656) (Table 7).

Enoxaparin and Apixaban

Propensity-score matching identified 1,489 patients per cohort. The enoxaparin cohort was 61.1 + 15.1 years old at the index event, versus the apixaban cohort at 61.4 + 14.9 years. The enoxaparin cohort had 1,054 (70.79%) female patients compared with 1,029 (69.11%) in the apixaban cohort. The enoxaparin cohort was primarily Caucasian patients (n=1,105; 74.21%), followed by 179 (12.02%) African American patients, 74 (4.97%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 27 (1.81%) Asian patients. The apixaban cohort demonstrated similar demographics with 1,080 (72.53%) Caucasian patients, followed by 180 (12.09%) African American patients, 76 (5.1%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 27 (1.81%) Asian patients. There were no significant differences in rates of PE (HR 0.949, 95%CI 0.673 – 1.339, p=0.4372), UE DVT (HR 0.832, 95%CI 0.472 – 1.466, p=0.1538), LE DVT (HR 1.166, 95%CI 0.869 – 1.566, p=0.8595), superficial VT (HR 5.323, 95%CI 1.19 – 23.815, p=0.493), bleeding (HR 1.218, 95%CI 0.948 – 1.565, p=0.4021), transfusion (HR 1.319, 95%CI 0.993 – 1.753, p=0.1663), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.131, 95%CI 0.966 – 1.325, p=0.0839) (Table 7).

Enoxaparin and Aspirin 81 mg

Propensity-score matching revealed 3,475 patients per cohort. The enoxaparin cohort was 58.8 + 15.3 years at index event, compared to the aspirin cohort at 58.2 + 14.3 years. The enoxaparin cohort had 2,438 (70.16%) female patients compared to the aspirin cohort with 2,445 (70.36%). Within the enoxaparin cohort, 2,539 (73.06%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 378 (10.88%) African American patients, 182 (5.24%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 74 (2.13%) Asian patients. The aspirin cohort demonstrated similar demographics with 2,554 (73.5%) Caucasian patients, followed by 363 (10.45%) African American patients, 196 (5.64%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 68 (1.96%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin cohort demonstrated significantly increased risk of LE DVT (HR 1.677, 95%CI 1.353 – 2.079, p=0.0081) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.597, 95%CI 1.422 – 1.794, p=0.0005) (Figure 3). There were no significant differences in rates of PE (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.354 – 2.236, p=0.2408), UE DVT (HR 1.773, 95%CI 1.108 – 2.837, p=0.8625), superficial VT (HR 4.273, 95%CI 1.969 – 9.273, p=0.5196), bleeding (HR 1.093, 95%CI 0.937 – 1.275, p=0.8554), or transfusion (HR 1.896, 95%CI 1.556 – 2.311, p=0.2609) (Table 7). Due to a significant difference between enoxaparin and Aspirin 81 mg, an E-value was calculated for LE DVT (E-value = 2.744) and all-cause mortality (E-value = 2.574).

Kaplan-Meier-survival-curve-for-pituitary-Cushing's-subtype-(mortality-and-LE-DVT)

Discussion

The concept of hypercoagulability in the setting of hypercortisolemia has been documented since the 1970s [10]. Estimates suggest an 18-fold risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with Cushing’s syndrome compared to the general population [11]. Furthermore, venous thromboembolism accounts for up to 11% of all deaths in Cushing’s syndrome [12]. Patients are often noted to have a “coagulation paradox” in Cushing’s syndrome, whereby there is a heightened risk for thrombosis, with concurrent bruising of the skin; thromboembolism is due to an imbalance between pro- and anti-coagulant pathways, whereas bruising is due to atrophy of the skin and capillary fragility [11]. As noted by Feelders and Nieman, two prominent phases for the development of thromboembolic events include the untreated (active) hypercortisolemia and the postoperative phases [11]. Population-based studies have demonstrated a heightened risk for venous thromboembolism prior to diagnosis (in some studies as early as three years before diagnosis) [9].

Despite this heightened risk for venous thromboembolic events, there appears to be a lack of awareness amongst institutions (and individual practitioners), along with improper management. Fleseriu and colleagues, however, do note that in 2020, the awareness of hypercoagulability in Cushing’s syndrome increased around fourfold in two years, with routine prophylaxis increasing to 75% (from 50%) perioperatively (however, most patients only received prophylaxis for up to two weeks postoperatively) [13]. Another survey was performed by the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions, noting concerns of heterogeneity with timing, type, and duration of prophylaxis, noting most centers do not have a thromboprophylaxis protocol (identifying only one reference center had a standardized thromboprophylaxis protocol for Cushing’s syndrome) [14]. From the European survey, it was noted that prophylaxis was initiated at diagnosis in 48% of patients, with 17% preoperatively, 26% on the day before (or of) surgery, 13% postoperatively, and 9% “depending on the presentation”. With regards to discontinuation of thromboprophylaxis, in centers with a standardized protocol (35% of reference centers), 38% of centers stopped at one month post-operatively, 25% between two and four weeks, and 37% between one week before and two weeks after surgery, between four and six days postoperatively, and at three months postoperatively. When cessation was individualized (in the remaining 65% of reference centers), 60% discontinued thromboprophylaxis once the patient was mobile, 40% with achievement of remission, 27% regarding patient status, and 7% dependent upon hemostatic parameters [14].

There is limited guidance concerning thromboprophylaxis recommendations in Cushing’s syndrome. For example, the Endocrine Society merely recommends assessing the risk of thrombosis in Cushing’s syndrome and administering perioperative prophylaxis if undergoing surgery, but provides no further recommendations [8]. The Pituitary Society highlights the absence of standardized practice for both pre- and postoperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with Cushing’s syndrome [15]. There appears to only be one set of guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in Cushing’s syndrome, known as the “Delphi Panel Consensus”, which forms the basis for the guidelines from the European Society for Endocrinology [9]. The Delphi Panel Consensus recommends considering anticoagulation for all patients with Cushing’s syndrome (in the absence of contraindications), regardless of the underlying etiology, and is recommended in the presence of risk factors [9]. Moreover, thromboprophylaxis is advised to begin at the time of diagnosis [9]. Currently, there is not enough evidence to provide a recommendation for thromboprophylaxis in mild autonomous cortisol secretion [9]. As with any medical patient, thromboprophylaxis should be initiated in all patients with active Cushing’s syndrome who are hospitalized (without contraindications) [9, 15]. Apart from chemical prophylaxis, anti-embolic stockings are not recommended due to the risk of skin fragility and friability [9]. The Delphi Consensus Panel furthermore advises to continue prophylactic anticoagulation for at least three months after biochemical remission (eucortisolemia) has occurred, and note those without additional risk factors (such as obesity, immobility, prior history of venous thromboembolism, or cardiac risk factors) can be considered candidates to stop the medication; one caveat, however, is for patients medically managed with mitotane (which can alter liver function and coagulation factor metabolism), there is an increased risk of bleeding, for which careful monitoring of renal function and bleeding risk is advised [9]. The Pituitary Society provides additional recommendations, such as discontinuing estrogen therapy in women (if used for contraception) [15]. While the Delphi Consensus Panel does not comment upon pediatric patients, the Pituitary Society advises against the use of thromboprophylaxis in the pediatric population due to bleeding risks [15].

The Delphi Consensus Panel furthermore recommend considering thromboprophylaxis at the time of inferior petrosal sinus sampling (if not started before this), due to the risk of thrombosis associated with this intervention; for those who are receiving prophylaxis, it is recommended to continue throughout the procedure, however, if has not been started, it is advised to initiate 12 hours post procedure. Similarly, if thromboprophylaxis was not considered earlier in a patient’s course, it should be reconsidered in the perioperative period, with the last dose of LMWH administered 24 hours prior to surgery and reinitiated 24 hours postoperatively [9]. Isand et al. recommend continuing thromboprophylaxis for three months after cortisol levels normalize (< 5 μg/dL) and when patients can mobilize [9]. In patients for whom a venous thromboembolism develops, patients are advised to receive a therapeutic dose of anticoagulation (preferably LMWH) for three to six months, followed by prophylaxis for three months after resolution of Cushing’s syndrome [9]. The Delphi Consensus Panel provides a summary of their recommendations, shown in Figure 4.

Algorithm-for-thromboprophylaxis-in-Cushing's-syndrome

Although intuitively, one may expect the procoagulant profile of Cushing’s syndrome to resolve upon attainment of eucortisolemia with medical management, studies have failed to demonstrate a reduction in venous thromboembolism with medical therapy [16]. Additionally, while one may expect resolution of hypercoagulability with surgical intervention (transsphenoidal sinus surgery or adrenalectomy), the risk maintains in the postoperative period, comparable to that of orthopedic surgery, at times up to one year and beyond to normalize [17]; data from European Register on Cushing’s Syndrome (ERCUSYN) database suggest the risk is greatest six months postoperatively [18]. The estimated risk for postoperative venous thromboembolism in pituitary-dependent Cushing’s is around 4.3% (compared to 0% with a non-functional pituitary adenoma); regarding adrenal surgery, the risk is estimated at around 2.6% [11]. Although the underlying mechanism for the persistent risk for venous thromboembolism remains unknown, it is hypothesized that a sudden drop in cortisol can lead to an inflammatory response (itself activating the coagulation cascade) [16]. Lopes and colleagues note an increase in the number of lymphocytes (because of loss of Th1 cell suppression), with increases in cytokines (such as interferon-gamma, interleukin-2, and transforming growth factor-beta) [16]. Comorbidities such as osteoporosis and myopathy (from hypercortisolemia) may be associated with decreased mobility in the postoperative period, influencing the risk for thrombosis [16].

Whilst all subtypes of Cushing’s syndrome can be associated with a heightened risk for venous thromboembolism (pituitary adenoma, adrenal adenoma, medication-induced, ectopic ACTH, and adrenal carcinoma), the latter two are often associated with malignant disease, which itself poses a risk for hypercoagulability from the underlying neoplasm [11]. Patients with Cushing’s syndrome have been found to demonstrate a reduction in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), alongside increases in clot lysis time, procoagulant factors (such as factor VIII, von-Willebrand factor and fibrinogen) and fibrinolysis inhibitors (including plasminogen activator-inhibitor-1, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, and alpha-2 antiplasmin) [11,12,17]. Varlamov et al. have also noted an increase in thrombin, thromboxane A2, and platelets. Other studies have additionally demonstrated elevated proteins C and S as well as antithrombin III, which are hypothesized to be increased as a compensatory mechanism from the state of hypercoagulability [12]. Barbot et al. demonstrate elevation in factor VIII and von-Willebrand factor within the first few months after transsphenoidal sinus surgery, along with abnormally large von-Willebrand multimers (which are typically found in the cellular components), which can induce spontaneous platelet aggregation [17].

Lopes et al. note that altered von-Willebrand factor levels are not a constant feature reported in Cushing’s syndrome, and state it depends upon the polymorphism of the gene promoter, providing an example of haplotype 1 of the gene promoter conferring the greatest risk for elevated von-Willebrand factor levels by cortisol [16]. Barbot and colleagues furthermore note ABO blood groupings as an additional influencer of the procoagulant state; as an example, blood group-O patients have a near one-quarter reduction in levels of von-Willebrand factor [17]. Feelders and Nieman note heterogeneity in coagulation profiles based on individual characteristics and differing assay techniques [11]. van Haalen and colleagues note an absence of a correlation between severity of hypercortisolism and hemostatic abnormalities [14]; this is echoed by Varlamov et al., stating there is no linear relationship between coagulation parameters and venous thromboembolic events, nor with urinary free cortisol elevation [12]. Varlamov and colleagues further note that a subset of patients may have unaltered coagulation parameters, for which they advise against stratifying patients’ risk based on coagulation parameters [12].

In 2016, Zilio and colleagues posed a scoring system to stratify patients with active Cushing’s syndrome, including both clinical and biochemical parameters, including age (> 69 = 2 points), reduction in mobility (2 points), acute severe infection (1 point), prior cardiovascular event(s) (1 point), midnight plasma cortisol (> 3.15 times upper limit of normal = 1 point), and shortened aPTT (1 point) [19]. Lopes et al. describe the stratification as follows: 2 points (low risk), 3 points (moderate risk), 4 points (high risk), and > 5 points (very high risk) [16]. It should be noted, however, that Zilio et al.’s study was performed on only 176 patients and has not been validated in other studies [19]. Further drawbacks include the failure to account for postoperative events (a major source of venous thromboembolism in Cushing’s syndrome), and despite the stratification categories, no recommendations for treatment are provided.

LMWH is the first-line medication, consistent across differing societies. Despite being the gold standard, there are limited studies demonstrating a beneficial reduction in venous thromboembolic events in such cohorts; similarly, studies are lacking in analysis of the other classes of anticoagulants in head-to-head comparisons against LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in hypercortisolism. Another limitation is the fact that certain studies solely address thromboprophylaxis in the postoperative period. As an example, McCormick et al. performed one of the only trials comparing unfractionated heparin and LMWH (enoxaparin), noting no differences in hemorrhagic complications or thromboses; however, this was analyzed in patients undergoing transsphenoidal sinus surgery [10].

The current study retrospectively analyzed the various anticoagulant agents for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in Cushing’s syndrome (of any subtype), compared to the gold standard, LMWH (in this study, enoxaparin). When analyzing Cushing’s syndrome, our study demonstrated no significant differences in outcomes between enoxaparin and warfarin, apixaban, or unfractionated heparin; however, aspirin 81 mg demonstrated a lower risk of all-cause mortality, PE, and LE DVT. With subanalysis of Cushing’s disease (pituitary-related), there was no significant difference between enoxaparin and warfarin, apixaban or unfractionated heparin; aspirin 81 mg again noted a reduced all-cause mortality and LE DVT (but did not lower the risk of PE, compared with Cushing’s syndrome of all types combined). With E-value sensitivity analysis, the association remained moderately robust with PE (all Cushing’s types combined), LE DVT (all Cushing’s types and pituitary Cushing’s), and mortality (solely pituitary Cushing’s), however, mortality was weak-to-moderate with Cushing’s syndrome of all types (Table 8).

Outcome Hazard Ratio E-value Interpretation
PE (All Cushing’s Types) 1.697 2.783 Moderate
LE DVT (All Cushing’s Types) 1.492 2.348 Moderate
LE DVT (Pituitary) 1.677 2.744 Moderate
Mortality (All Cushing’s Types) 1.272 1.860 Weak
Mortality (Pituitary) 1.597 2.574 Moderate

Aspirin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, was first identified to irreversibly inhibit platelet function in the 1950s by Dr. Lawrence Craven [20]. Data is scarce in terms of aspirin’s role in thromboprophylaxis in hypercortisolemia. In 1999, Semple and Laws Jr. initially reported the use of aspirin postoperatively for six weeks (starting postoperative day one) in patients with Cushing’s disease who underwent transsphenoidal sinus surgery; while the authors mentioned a reduction in rates of venous thromboemboli, no factual data was provided (including dose of aspirin, complications experienced, and number of venous thromboemboli before and after) [21]. In 2015, Smith et al. performed an additional study with 81 mg of aspirin again administered starting postoperative day one (alongside sequential compression devices and mobilization), reporting that none of the 82 patients developed DVTs (with only two cases of epistaxis) [22]. It was not until 1994, however, in the Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaborations’ meta-analysis, that aspirin demonstrated a reduced risk for venous thromboembolism, with similar findings replicated in the Pulmonary Embolism Prevention trial in 2000 and the WARFASA (Warfarin and Aspirin) and ASPIRE (Aspirin to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism) trials in 2012 [23]. In 2012, the American College of Chest Physicians [24,25] were the first to recommend aspirin as thromboprophylaxis following total hip or knee replacement, followed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in 2018 (advising LMWP followed by aspirin) and the American Society of Hematology in 2019 (advising either aspirin or oral anticoagulation after total hip or knee replacement) [25]. Despite recognition of the reduction in venous thromboembolism by aspirin (and its incorporation into guidelines), its role in thromboprophylaxis is largely limited to orthopedic surgery. The mechanisms of aspirin and its reduction in venous thromboembolism is not entirely understood, but believed to occur via differing mechanisms, including inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 (which reduces thromboxane A2, a promoter of platelet aggregation), prevention of thrombin formation and thrombin-mediated coagulant reactions, acetylation of proteins involved in coagulation (such as fibrinogen), and enhancing fibrinolysis [23,26].

Strengths and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, a study specifically comparing the impact of aspirin with that of LMWP in Cushing’s syndrome has not been performed; as a result, our study adds to the paucity of literature pertaining to this topic. Notable strengths in the study include a large sample size (allowing robust comparisons amongst treatment arms), incorporation of propensity-score matching (allowing for internal validity through balancing baseline comparison groups), and comprehensive measurable outcomes.

Limitations to our study are multifold, and include retrospective design, for which intrinsic biases are inherent and can affect causal inference (despite matching techniques). Furthermore, data collection (via TriNetX) relied on correct ICD-10 coding, which could be a source of potential error if conditions and medications are coded improperly, or if our queries missed ICD-10 codes that could also correspond with outcomes. Similarly, TriNetX also relies on queries of healthcare organizations, many of which may not have responded with data, which could inaccurately skew the results. Although TriNetX uses global data, the majority of patient data was derived from the United States population, which could result in less generalizable data to the global public. These findings should be interpreted within the correct context and with caution to prevent misrepresentation. Compliance was a variable that could not be controlled for. Moreover, those who had taken the medication before the index event were excluded from analysis. While aspirin 81 mg demonstrated a reduction in LE DVT and mortality in Cushing’s disease along with PE with Cushing’s syndrome, we only performed a subgroup analysis concerning pituitary-related causes of Cushing’s syndrome (Cushing’s disease); it remains unclear why the risk of PE was not reduced in the latter subgroup. Due to limitations in ICD-10 coding, further subgroup analyses were not performed (such as adrenal adenoma, adrenal adenocarcinoma, or ectopic ACTH syndrome), for which the implications of treating with aspirin 81 mg cannot be inferred from our data. Similarly, further subgroup analyses, such as gender and race, were not performed. Our study assessed adult patients with Cushing’s syndrome, and not pediatric patients, which limits the applicability of our findings to such a cohort. Further studies are required to confirm and replicate our findings in a prospective fashion, stratifying subtypes of Cushing’s Syndrome.

Conclusions

Cushing’s syndrome is associated with a heightened risk for venous thromboembolism, regardless of the underlying etiology. Currently, LMWHs such as enoxaparin remain the gold standard for both thromboprophylaxis and treatment in such patients. There is limited data to support superiority over alternative agents. Our study analyzed enoxaparin against warfarin, unfractionated heparin, and apixaban, for which there was no significant risk difference. When compared to aspirin, enoxaparin demonstrated a greater risk for the development of PE, LE DVT, and all-cause mortality. Further prospective trials are required to replicate our findings and confirm the superiority of aspirin over LMWH.

References

  1. Ulrich-Lai YM, Figueiredo HF, Ostrander MM, Choi DC, Engeland WC, Herman JP: Chronic stress induces adrenal hyperplasia and hypertrophy in a subregion-specific manner. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 291:E965-73. 10.1152/ajpendo.00070.2006
  2. Lindholm J: Cushing’s syndrome: historical aspects. Pituitary. 2000, 3:97-104. 10.1023/a:1009905808033
  3. Raff H, Carroll T: Cushing’s syndrome: from physiological principles to diagnosis and clinical care. J Physiol. 2015, 593:493-506. 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.282871
  4. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK: Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2006, 367:1605-17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68699-6
  5. Savas M, Mehta S, Agrawal N, van Rossum EF, Feelders RA: Approach to the patient: diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022, 107:3162-74. 10.1210/clinem/dgac492
  6. Suarez MG, Stack M, Hinojosa-Amaya JM, et al.: Hypercoagulability in Cushing syndrome, prevalence of thrombotic events: a large, single-center, retrospective study. J Endocr Soc. 2020, 4:bvz033. 10.1210/jendso/bvz033
  7. St-Jean M, Lim DS, Langlois F: Hypercoagulability in Cushing’s syndrome: from arterial to venous disease. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021, 35:101496. 10.1016/j.beem.2021.101496
  8. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Murad MH, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Tabarin A: Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015, 100:2807-31. 10.1210/jc.2015-1818
  9. Isand K, Arima H, Bertherat J, et al.: Delphi panel consensus on recommendations for thromboprophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in endogenous Cushing’s syndrome: a position statement. Eur J Endocrinol. 2025, 192:R17-27. 10.1093/ejendo/lvaf017
  10. McCormick JP, Sun M, Shafqat I, Heaney AP, Bergsneider M, Wang MB: Venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis in Cushing Disease patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2022, 27:10.1016/j.inat.2021.101371
  11. Feelders RA, Nieman LK: Hypercoagulability in Cushing’s syndrome: incidence, pathogenesis and need for thromboprophylaxis protocols. Pituitary. 2022, 25:746-9. 10.1007/s11102-022-01261-9
  12. Varlamov EV, Langlois F, Vila G, Fleseriu M: Management of endocrine disease: cardiovascular risk assessment, thromboembolism, and infection prevention in Cushing’s syndrome: a practical approach. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021, 184:R207-24. 10.1530/EJE-20-1309
  13. Fleseriu M, Biller BM, Grossman A, Swearingen B, Melmed S: Hypercoagulability in Cushing’s disease: a risk awareness and prophylaxis survey on behalf of the Pituitary Society. 15th International Pituitary Congress: Program and Abstracts. The Pituitary Society, Orlando, FL; 2017. 35.
  14. van Haalen FM, Kaya M, Pelsma IC, et al.: Current clinical practice for thromboprophylaxis management in patients with Cushing’s syndrome across reference centers of the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022, 17:178. 10.1186/s13023-022-02320-x
  15. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, et al.: Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9:847-75. 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7
  16. Lopes V, Marques O, De Sousa Lages A: Preventive strategies for hypercoagulation in Cushing’s syndrome: when and how. Thromb J. 2023, 21:72. 10.1186/s12959-023-00515-1
  17. Barbot M, Daidone V, Zilio M, et al.: Perioperative thromboprophylaxis in Cushing’s disease: what we did and what we are doing?. Pituitary. 2015, 18:487-93. 10.1007/s11102-014-0600-y
  18. Isand K, Feelders R, Brue T, et al.: High prevalence of venous thrombotic events in Cushing’s syndrome: data from ERCUSYN and details in relation to surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2024, 190:75-85. 10.1093/ejendo/lvad176
  19. Zilio M, Mazzai L, Sartori MT, et al.: A venous thromboembolism risk assessment model for patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrine. 2016, 52:322-32. 10.1007/s12020-015-0665-z
  20. Zaorsky NG, Buyyounouski MK, Li T, Horwitz EM: Aspirin and statin nonuse associated with early biochemical failure after prostate radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012, 84:e13-7. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.050
  21. Semple PL, Laws ER Jr: Complications in a contemporary series of patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease. J Neurosurg. 1999, 91:175-9. 10.3171/jns.1999.91.2.0175
  22. Smith TR, Hulou MM, Huang KT, Nery B, de Moura SM, Cote DJ, Laws ER: Complications after transsphenoidal surgery for patients with Cushing’s disease and silent corticotroph adenomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2015, 38:E12. 10.3171/2014.10.FOCUS14705
  23. Diep R, Garcia D: Does aspirin prevent venous thromboembolism?. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020, 2020:634-41. 10.1182/hematology.2020000150
  24. Maddukuri RK, Chava H, Kondaveeti ST, Mutthineni MV, Vegesana BP: Aspirin for prophylaxis of VTE in patients with hip/ knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Indian J Pharmacol. 2024, 56:420-9. 10.4103/ijp.ijp_732_21
  25. Spoladore R, Milani M, Spreafico LP, Agnelli G, Savonitto S: Prevention of thromboembolism after a fracture: is aspirin enough?. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024, 26:i102-7. 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae025
  26. Undas A, Brummel-Ziedins KE, Mann KG: Antithrombotic properties of aspirin and resistance to aspirin: beyond strictly antiplatelet actions. Blood. 2007, 109:2285-92. 10.1182/blood-2006-01-010645

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/371036-therapeutic-options-for-the-prevention-of-thromboses-in-cushings-syndrome-a-propensity-matched-retrospective-cohort-analysis#!/

A Prospective Trial With Ketoconazole Induction Therapy and Octreotide Maintenance Treatment for Cushing’s Disease

Abstract

Context and Objective

The lack of efficacy of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST2) preferring somatostatin analogs in patients with Cushing’s disease (CD) results from a downregulating effect of hypercortisolism on SST2 expression. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of a strategy with sequential treatment of ketoconazole to reduce cortisol levels and potentially restore SST2 expression followed by octreotide as maintenance therapy in patients with CD.

Patients and Design

Fourteen adult patients with CD were prospectively enrolled. Patients started with ketoconazole. Once cortisol levels were normalized, octreotide was initiated. After 2 months of combination therapy, patients were maintained on octreotide monotherapy until the end of the study period (9 months). Treatment success was defined by normalization of urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels.

Results

Ketoconazole was able to normalize UFC levels in 11 (79%) patients. Octreotide effectively sustained normal levels of UFC in 3 patients (27%) (responders). Four patients (36%) showed a partial response. The remaining 4 (36%) patients developed hypercortisolism as soon as ketoconazole was stopped (nonresponders). Octreotide responders had lower UFC levels at baseline when compared to partial responders and nonresponders (1.40 ± 0.07 vs 2.05 ± 0.20 UNL, P = 0.083). SST2 mRNA was highly expressed in adenomas of 2 responder patients (0.803 and 0.216 copies per hprt).

Conclusion

Sequential treatment with ketoconazole to lower cortisol levels followed by octreotide to maintain biochemical remission according to UFC may be effective in a subset of patients with mild CD, suggesting that cortisol-mediated suppression of SST2 expression is a reversible process.

Transsphenoidal adenomectomy is the first-line treatment of Cushing’s disease (CD) [1-3]. Medical therapy can be used as an adjunctive preoperative treatment or in persistent or recurrent disease [245]. Pharmacological treatment of CD can be divided into 3 approaches: pituitary-directed therapy, steroids synthesis inhibitors, and glucocorticoid receptor antagonists [4]. Because of limited efficacy and side effects, a combination of drugs is often necessary to achieve biochemical control [25-8].

Steroid synthesis inhibitors are often used as a first-line medical treatment modality. Ketoconazole and metyrapone can normalize cortisol production in about 50% to 60% of patients, whereas the recently introduced steroidogenic enzyme inhibitor osilodrostat has an efficacy of up to 80% [9-11]. Pharmacotherapy targeting the corticotroph tumor itself may be a more rational approach since it exerts effects at the cause of the disease [2512]. The most commonly used drugs in this category are cabergoline, a dopamine agonist, and pasireotide, a second-generation somatostatin analog [2313]. Cabergoline inhibits ACTH secretion through agonism of the dopamine type 2 receptor, expressed in the majority of corticotroph tumors [1415]. However, cabergoline is able to normalize the cortisol secretion in less than half the patients, and a substantial number of patients escape from treatment [481617]. Several small studies show promising effects of cabergoline combined with ketoconazole [78]. Pasireotide exhibits high-affinity binding to somatostatin receptor subtype (SST) 5, which is the SST expressed at the highest level in corticotroph pituitary adenomas. Pasireotide shows moderate efficacy in normalizing cortisol levels in a subset of patients with mild to moderate hypercortisolism, with hyperglycemia as an important side effect [131819].

Octreotide, a somatostatin analog with high binding affinity to SST2, was shown to lower ACTH production in patients with corticotroph tumor progression following bilateral adrenalectomy but was unsuccessful in patients with active CD [2021]. Table 1 provides an overview of the clinical studies using octreotide in CD. Tumoral pituitary corticotroph cells express about 5 to 10 times higher SST5 compared to SST2, which may explain the reduced efficacy of octreotide compared to pasireotide in inhibiting ACTH secretion in primary cultures of human corticotroph tumors as well as in vivo [1328]. This is explained by selective suppressive effects of high cortisol concentrations in active CD on SST2 expression, resulting in an absent treatment response to octreotide [132930]. Hence, it may be hypothesized that normalizing or lowering cortisol levels in patients with CD can result in a reciprocal increase in SST2 expression by corticotroph tumor cells. Under such conditions, the use of octreotide could play a potential role in CD management based on its safer toxicity profile compared to pasireotide [31].

 

Table 1.

Literature review: octreotide treatment in patients with Cushing’s disease

Study n Maximal octreotide dose Response criteria Full response Partial response No response Maximal treatment duration
Invitti et al, 1990 [22] 3 1200 µg/day UFC 1 2 49 days
Lamberts et al, 1989 [20] 3 100 µg (single injection) Serum cortisol 3 Trial 12 hours
Arregger et al, 2012 [21] 2 Oct-lar (20 mg/month) UFC 2 4 months
Woodhouse et al, 1993 [23] 4 100-500 µg (every 8 hours) Serum cortisol 4 Trial 24-72 hours
El-Shafie et al, 2015 [24] 6 100 µg (every 8 hours) Serum cortisol 6 Trial 72 hours
Ambrosi et al, 1990 [25] 4 100 µg (single injection) Serum cortisol 4 Trial 7 hours (CRH stimulus)
Stalla et al, 1994 [26] 5 100 µg (30 and 180 minutes) serum cortisol 5 Trial 400 minutes (CRH stimulus)
Vignati et al, 1996 [27] 3 100 µg (single injection)/300 µg/day Serum cortisol/UFC 1 2 Trial 8 hours/75 days
Total 30 0 2 (7%) 28

Abbreviation: Oct-lar, long acting repeatable octreotide; UFC, urinary free cortisol.

We previously demonstrated that in corticotroph adenomas obtained from CD patients who were in biochemical remission before surgery, induced by medical treatment, SST2 mRNA expression was significantly higher compared to corticotroph tumor tissue from patients with hypercortisolism at the time of operation [32]. In fact, SST2 mRNA levels in adenomas from these normocortisolemic patients were comparable to those of GH-producing adenomas, which are usually responsive to SST2-preferring somatostatin analogs [32]. In this pilot study, we, therefore, aim to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a sequential regimen with ketoconazole induction therapy to reduce cortisol levels in CD and potentially restore SST2 expression at the level of the corticotroph adenoma, followed by octreotide treatment to reduce ACTH secretion.

Methods

Study Population

Adult patients with recently diagnosed treatment-naïve CD or with persistent or recurrent hypercortisolism after transsphenoidal surgery were eligible for enrollment. Patients already on medical treatment for CD were included only after a drug washout period of 4 weeks and following confirmation of hypercortisolism. Exclusion criteria included elevated liver enzymes, renal insufficiency, history of pituitary radiotherapy, symptomatic cholelithiasis, and pregnancy.

The study protocol was approved by the ethical committees of the participating centers. All patients gave their written informed consent. The trial was registered by the Dutch Trial Register (nr. NL37105.078.11).

Diagnostic Workup of CD

Upon clinical evidence of CD, the diagnosis was biochemically established by elevated 24-h urinary free cortisol (UFC) concentrations (3 samples), failure in suppressing plasma cortisol after 1 mg of dexamethasone, and increased midnight saliva cortisol levels. ACTH dependency was defined on the basis of normal to high ACTH plasma levels. Additionally, plasma cortisol diurnal rhythm was assessed with measurement at 9 Am, 5 Pm, 10 Pm, and midnight. Once a diagnosis of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism was confirmed, magnetic resonance imaging was performed to detect a pituitary tumor. In the absence of a lesion, or a lesion of less than 6 mm, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling was performed to confirm central ACTH overproduction.

Drug Regimen Protocol

After inclusion, patients were followed monthly for up to 9 months. All patients started with ketoconazole; the initial dose depended on the severity of hypercortisolism, with 600 mg per day for mild hypercortisolism [UFC ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)] and 800 mg per day for a higher level of hypercortisolism (UFC >1.5 times the ULN). (Fig. 1). If necessary, the dose of ketoconazole could be uptitrated to 1200 mg per day after 2 months to achieve biochemical remission according to UFC excretion. Once UFC levels were normalized, long acting repeatable (LAR) octreotide treatment was initiated at a dose of 20 mg every 4 weeks. If UFC concentrations remained normal after 2 months of combined therapy (ketoconazole plus octreotide), ketoconazole was discontinued and patients were maintained on octreotide monotherapy until the end of the study period. If the UFC level (mean of 2 samples) was increased above the ULN, the octreotide dose was increased from 20 to 30 mg every 4 weeks. This may have occurred earlier, while octreotide was still combined with ketoconazole, or later, on octreotide monotherapy.

 

Study protocol. If UFC excretion (mean of 2 collections) increases again (above the ULN) under octreotide/ketoconazole combination therapy or octreotide monotherapy (20 mg every 4 weeks), the octreotide dosage will be increased to 30 mg every 4 weeks.

Figure 1.

Study protocol. If UFC excretion (mean of 2 collections) increases again (above the ULN) under octreotide/ketoconazole combination therapy or octreotide monotherapy (20 mg every 4 weeks), the octreotide dosage will be increased to 30 mg every 4 weeks.

Abbreviations: CAB, cabergoline; UFC, urinary free cortisol.; ULN, upper limit of normal.

Response to octreotide was defined as the maintenance of normal UFC levels after ketoconazole discontinuation until the end of the study period, while partial response was defined as normal UFC levels maintained for at least 1 month after ketoconazole discontinuation and/or a >50% decrease of UFC levels at the last follow-up visit compared to the baseline value. Lack of response to octreotide was defined by the inability of octreotide to maintain normal UFC levels after discontinuation of ketoconazole. In this respect, a persistently elevated UFC concentration for 2 consecutive months was considered as treatment failure, after which the study protocol was terminated earlier, before the study period of 9 months. In case of biochemical remission, octreotide monotherapy was maintained until the end of the study period of 9 months, after which octreotide could be continued or replaced by another treatment modality.

In case ketoconazole therapy for 3 months failed to control cortisol production, a different treatment regimen was introduced. Cabergoline instead of octreotide was added to ketoconazole in an attempt to achieve biochemical control. Cabergoline, starting at 0.5 mg every other day, was gradually increased up to 1 and eventually 2 mg every other day, as needed, and ketoconazole was gradually reduced from 1200 to 400 mg per day within 4 weeks. If successful, this combination treatment (ketoconazole and cabergoline) was maintained until the end of the study period.

Side-effects Monitoring

Between the visits, patients were contacted by telephone for monitoring of adverse events. At each visit, laboratory evaluation was performed of pituitary function, hematology, blood chemistry, liver enzymes and renal function, hemoglobin A1c, glucose, and insulin levels.

During treatment with ketoconazole, concentrations of liver enzymes (aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma glutamyl transferase) were regularly measured. In case of an increase in liver enzymes (>4x ULN), the ketoconazole dose was decreased by 50%. If dose reduction did not lead to normalization of liver enzyme concentrations, ketoconazole was stopped with termination of the study. If relative adrenal insufficiency developed with steroid withdrawal complaints, the cortisol-lowering medication was stopped and eventually restarted at a lower dose. In case of absolute adrenal insufficiency hydrocortisone replacement therapy was started in addition to interruption of study medication. Electrocardiography was performed at baseline and at follow-up visits.

Assessment of Treatment Efficacy

Twenty-four-hour urinary cortisol excretion (2 collections) was measured at each monthly visit. Plasma cortisol diurnal rhythm (CDR) was assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months. Recovery of CDR was defined by a serum cortisol concentration at midnight of less than 67% of that at 0900 hours (Pm/am ratio >0.67) [33]. Biochemical remission was defined as normalization of UFC concentrations, ie, the mean of 2 collections below the ULN.

Assessment of Clinical Parameters

Physical examination including measurement of blood pressure, heart rate, weight, height, body mass index, and waist circumference was performed at baseline and assessed monthly. Additionally, a routine laboratory examination, including full blood count, electrolytes, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, liver enzymes, lipase, amylase, bilirubin, glucose, insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin, was conducted at each visit.

Quantitative PCR

Eleven patients underwent surgery after the study period. In 4 patients, sufficient corticotroph pituitary adenoma tissue was available to assess SST2 mRNA expression. To assess the purity of the samples, GH mRNA relative to pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) mRNA was calculated. Only samples with a GH/POMC ratio less than 10% for normal pituitary tissue were used in this analysis [34].

Quantitative PCR was performed following a protocol as previously described [35]. Briefly, poly A+ mRNA was isolated from corticotroph adenoma cells using oligo (dT)25 dynabeads (Invitrogen, Breda, The Netherlands). Subsequently, 23 µL H2O was added for elution, and 10 µL of poly A mRNA was used to synthesize cDNA using a commercial RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Scientific, Breda, The Netherlands). The assay for RT-qPCR was performed using Taqman Universal PCR mastermix (Applied Biosystems, Breda, The Netherlands) supplemented with sst2 forward and reverse primers and probes. (Supplementary Table S1) [36]. The expression of SST2 mRNA was determined relative to the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) housekeeping gene.

Immunohistochemistry

From 4 patients, representative adenoma tissue was available for immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC was performed on 4-µm thick whole slide sections from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, on a validated and accredited automated slide stainer (Benchmark ULTRA System, VENTANA Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, following deparaffinization and heat-induced antigen retrieval, the tissue samples were incubated with rabbit anti-SST2A antibody (Biotrend; NB-49-015-1ML, dilution 1:25) for 32 minutes at 37°C, followed by Optiview detection (#760-500 and #760-700, Ventana). Counterstain was done by hematoxylin II for 12 minutes and a blue coloring reagent for 8 minutes. Each tissue slide contained a fragment of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded pancreatic tissue as an on-slide positive control. A semiquantitative immunoreactivity scoring system (IRS) was used by 2 independent investigators to assess SST2 immunostaining. IRS is based on 2 scales: first, the fraction of positive-stained cells > 80%, 51% to 80%, 10% to 50%, <10% and 0 and second, the intensity of immunostaining as strong, moderate, weak, and negative. The product of these 2 factors was used to calculate the IRS final score (range from 0 to 12) [37].

Statistical Analysis

Given the proof-of-concept nature of the present study, no formal statistical power and sample size calculations were performed. Patients were grouped according to the level of response to treatment in responders, partial responders, and nonresponders. For statistical comparisons, partial responders and nonresponders were grouped together and compared to responders.

Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SEM. Categorical variables are expressed as counts and percentages. For comparisons between groups, Student’s t-test was used. For paired comparisons (baseline vs follow-up), paired t-test was used. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. GraphPad Prism version 5.01 was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Study Population

Sixteen patients with CD were prospectively enrolled, of whom 14 started the study protocol. One patient withdrew at baseline, and 1 patient was excluded because of pseudo-Cushing’s syndrome due to a psychiatric disorder. The mean age was 48.6 years; 64% (n = 9) were female; 86% (n = 12) were newly diagnosed and naïve in treatment; and 71% (n = 10) presented with mild hypercortisolism, defined as a UFC level <2 times the ULN, at baseline. The average treatment duration in this study was 6 months. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (93%), followed by diabetes mellitus (50%) and dyslipidemia (43%). The majority of patients (79%, n = 11) exhibited a flattened cortisol rhythm with persistently high levels of plasma cortisol throughout the day (Table 2).

 

Table 2.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population

Characteristics Population (n = 14)
Female sex, no. (%) 9 (64.28)
Age at study, mean (median), years 48.64 (48)
Status of CD, no. (%)
 Newly diagnosed 12 (86)
 Persistent 1 (7.1)
 Recurrent 1 (7.1)
UFC level, times ULN, mean (median) 1.84 (1.76)
ACTH, mean, pg/mL 10.23 ± 6.8
Severity of CD, no. (%)a
 Mild 10 (71.42)
 Moderate 4 (28.57)
 Severe 0 (0)
Disturbed circadian diurnal rhythm, no. (%)b 11 (78.6)
Months of study completed, mean (median) 6.43 (7)
MRI, no. (%)
 Nonvisible adenomas 3 (21)
 Microadenomas 9 (64)
 Macroadenomas 2 (14)
Comorbidities, no. (%)
 Diabetes 7 (50)
 Hypertension 13 (92.85)
 Heart/vascular disease 3 (21.42)
 Dyslipidemia 6 (42.85)
 Obesity 5 (35.71)

Abbreviations: CD, Cushing’s disease; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; UFC, urinary free cortisol; ULN, upper limit of normal.

aMild hypercortisolism was defined as UFC level less than 2 times the ULN, moderate hypercortisolism as UFC level between 2 and 5 times the ULN, and severe hypercortisolism as UFC level above 5 times the ULN.

bDisturbed circadian diurnal rhythm was defined as serum cortisol concentration at 2400 hours/serum cortisol concentration at 0900 hours (Pm/am ratio) above 0.67 [33].

Ketoconazole Treatment

All patients started treatment with ketoconazole monotherapy at a dose of 600 to 800 mg per day depending on baseline UFC level. In 11 patients (79%), normal values of UFC were achieved after 1 or 2 months of treatment. One patient developed symptoms of hypocortisolism with nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. Ketoconazole was discontinued and restarted a week later with a lower dose (200 mg/day), also resulting in normal UFC levels. Another patient discontinued the treatment in the first week because of clinical intolerance. A transient increase in liver enzymes was observed in 5 patients (39%), but no patient had to stop the study protocol because of liver toxicity. Most patients who achieved normal values of UFC (n = 11 out of 14; 79%) lost weight (mean weight loss = 7 ± 4.6 kg) during ketoconazole treatment. No abnormalities were found on electrocardiography during treatment with ketoconazole and octreotide mono- or combination therapy.

According to the study protocol, octreotide (20 mg every 28 days) was added to ketoconazole in the 11 patients who achieved normal cortisoluria. With the combination treatment, 9 patients (82%) sustained normal UFC levels. In 2 patients with recurrent hypercortisolism, increasing the dose of octreotide from 20 to 30 mg/4 weeks normalized UFC levels. Ketoconazole treatment was then stopped, and all patients continued octreotide (20 or 30 mg per month) monotherapy.

Octreotide Treatment

Octreotide monotherapy maintained normal levels of UFC in 3 patients (27%) (responders, Fig 2A). Four (36%) other patients showed a partial response to octreotide (Fig. 2B shows the responses in the individual patients). In 3 of these patients, normal UFC levels were sustained for 1 or 2 months following discontinuation of ketoconazole, and in the other partial responder, the UFC levels at the last follow-up visit had decreased by 57% compared to the baseline levels. The remaining 4 patients developed hypercortisolism as soon as ketoconazole was stopped (nonresponders, Fig. 2C). Responders to octreotide monotherapy had lower UFC levels at baseline when compared to partial responders and nonresponders, with a trend to statistical significance (P = .083) (Table 3). No differences were observed between the 2 groups (responders vs partial responders and nonresponders) related to age, sex, number of comorbidities, and baseline and follow-up cortisol diurnal rhythm (Table 3).

 

Levels of UFC under sequential KTC and Octr treatment. (A) Octr responders (n = 3, patients 7, 8, 13). All patients started treatment with KTC monotherapy at a dose of 600 mg per day. Subsequently, Octr (20 mg every 28 days) was added to the treatment regimen. After 2 months of combined therapy, KTC was discontinued. In 2 cases, this led to a gradual increase in UFC levels requiring a higher dose of Octr (30 mg/month). All 3 patients then remained in remission under Octr monotherapy. (B) Octr partial responders (n = 4, patients 5, 10, 14, and 16). The patients followed different treatment schedules. Patient 5 started with KTC monotherapy followed by 1 month of combined treatment (KTC + Octr) and subsequent Octr monotherapy. Under Octr treatment, the patient was in remission for 2 months. Patient 10 started with KTC monotherapy, followed by 3 months of combined treatment (KTC + Octr) because of an escape of the treatment requiring an increase in the dose of Octr from 20 to 30 mg/month and subsequently went on Octr 30 mg/month monotherapy. Under Octr treatment, the patient was in remission for 2 months. Patient 14 started with KTC monotherapy, achieving remission of the disease in the second month, followed by 2 months of combined treatment (KTC + Octr) and subsequent Octr monotherapy. Under Octr treatment, the patient was in remission for 1 month. The last patient (no. 16) started with KTC monotherapy, achieving a normal cortisol level, followed by combined treatment and subsequent Octr monotherapy. UFC levels at follow-up had decreased by 57% compared to baseline. (C) Octr nonresponders (n = 4, patients 2, 4, 12, and 15). All patients started treatment with KTC monotherapy at a dose of 600 to 800 mg per day. Subsequently, Octr was added to the treatment for 2 months. KTC was discontinued in the third month, which led to a gradual increase in UFC levels. Despite the increased dose of Octr (30 mg/month), all patients failed to maintain disease remission. Data represent mean ± SEM.

Figure 2.

Levels of UFC under sequential KTC and Octr treatment. (A) Octr responders (n = 3, patients 7, 8, 13). All patients started treatment with KTC monotherapy at a dose of 600 mg per day. Subsequently, Octr (20 mg every 28 days) was added to the treatment regimen. After 2 months of combined therapy, KTC was discontinued. In 2 cases, this led to a gradual increase in UFC levels requiring a higher dose of Octr (30 mg/month). All 3 patients then remained in remission under Octr monotherapy. (B) Octr partial responders (n = 4, patients 5, 10, 14, and 16). The patients followed different treatment schedules. Patient 5 started with KTC monotherapy followed by 1 month of combined treatment (KTC + Octr) and subsequent Octr monotherapy. Under Octr treatment, the patient was in remission for 2 months. Patient 10 started with KTC monotherapy, followed by 3 months of combined treatment (KTC + Octr) because of an escape of the treatment requiring an increase in the dose of Octr from 20 to 30 mg/month and subsequently went on Octr 30 mg/month monotherapy. Under Octr treatment, the patient was in remission for 2 months. Patient 14 started with KTC monotherapy, achieving remission of the disease in the second month, followed by 2 months of combined treatment (KTC + Octr) and subsequent Octr monotherapy. Under Octr treatment, the patient was in remission for 1 month. The last patient (no. 16) started with KTC monotherapy, achieving a normal cortisol level, followed by combined treatment and subsequent Octr monotherapy. UFC levels at follow-up had decreased by 57% compared to baseline. (C) Octr nonresponders (n = 4, patients 2, 4, 12, and 15). All patients started treatment with KTC monotherapy at a dose of 600 to 800 mg per day. Subsequently, Octr was added to the treatment for 2 months. KTC was discontinued in the third month, which led to a gradual increase in UFC levels. Despite the increased dose of Octr (30 mg/month), all patients failed to maintain disease remission. Data represent mean ± SEM.

Abbreviations: KTC, ketoconazole; Octr, octreotide; UFC, urinary free cortisol (24 hours).

 

Table 3.

Clinical characteristics of responder compared to partial/nonresponder patients

Characteristics Responders Partial/nonresponders P-value
No. of patients 3 8
Age (years) (mean ± SEM) 39.67 ± 6.88 52 ± 4.30 .163
Number of comborbidities (mean ± SEM) 2.33 ± 0.33 2.38 ± 0.57 .967
Initial UFC (mean ± SEM) 1.40 ± 0.07 2.05 ± 0.20 .083
Baseline CDR, Pm/am ratio (mean ± SEM) 0.85 ± 0.14 0.91 ± 0.10 .752
Follow-up CDR, Pm/am ratio (mean ± SEM) 0.61 ± 0.17 0.81 ± 0.11 .43

Abbreviations: CDR, circadian diurnal rhythm; UFC, urinary free cortisol.

Responders

Individual patient numbers in brackets refer to the patient numbers in Figs. 2 and 3 and Supplementary Table S1 [36]. In 2 (patients 8 and 13) of the 3 responders, UFC levels gradually increased after discontinuation of ketoconazole treatment, requiring an increase in the octreotide dose from 20 to 30 mg that ultimately induced sustained normalization of UFC levels (Fig. 2A). Overall, among responders, the mean UFC levels at baseline was 1.40 ± 0.07 times the ULN and 0.62 ± 0.19 times the ULN at follow-up at the end of the study period (P = .09). Regarding the CDR, 2 patients (no. 7 and 13) at baseline exhibited disturbed CDR, and in 1 patient (no. 8), it was slightly altered. Full recovery of the CDR at follow-up was observed in 2 patients (no. 7 and 8), including the 1 (no. 8) with discrete alteration, while in another (patient 13), there was a partial recovery. On average, patients exhibited a numerically lower cortisol Pm/am ratio at follow-up as compared to baseline (baseline Pm/am ratios 0.86 ± 0.14 and 0.62 ± 0.09 at follow-up, P = .15). In terms of clinical features of CD, 2 (no. 7 and 13) of the 3 patients showed improvement in weight, waist circumference, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure during the treatment period, with the remaining patient (no. 8) showing a worsening of these parameters (Supplementary Table S2) [36].

 

mRNA expression level of SST2 in corticotroph tumors. SST2 mRNA expression in responder (n = 2), partial responder (n = 1), and nonresponder (n = 1). SST2 mRNA expression level in somatotroph tumors (filled bar) was included for comparison (n = 10; ratio over HPRT, mean ± SEM: 0.27 ± 0.08), as published previously by our group using a similar protocol [32].

Figure 3.

mRNA expression level of SST2 in corticotroph tumors. SST2 mRNA expression in responder (n = 2), partial responder (n = 1), and nonresponder (n = 1). SST2 mRNA expression level in somatotroph tumors (filled bar) was included for comparison (n = 10; ratio over HPRT, mean ± SEM: 0.27 ± 0.08), as published previously by our group using a similar protocol [32].

Abbreviations: HPRT, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase; non-resp, nonresponder; partial resp, partial responder; pt, patient.

Partial Responders

Among the 4 patients (patients 5, 10, 14, and 16) with a partial response to octreotide monotherapy, UFC levels were sustained for 1 to 2 months in 3 patients with a gradual increase after ketoconazole discontinuation (Fig. 2B). In another patient, UFC levels at follow-up had decreased by at least 50% compared to baseline, albeit still at abnormal levels (Fig. 2B, patient 16). For all 4 patients, the mean UFC at baseline was 2.32 ± 0.33 and 2.18 ± 0.34 times the ULN at follow-up at the end of the study period (P = .83). No significant change in CDR was observed, with a plasma cortisol Pm/am ratio of 0.99 ± 0.14 at baseline compared to 0.94 ± 0.07 at follow-up. Three out of 4 partial responders (patients 5, 14, and 16) showed improvement in weight and waist circumference at follow-up. Blood pressure control improved in 2 patients (no. 14 and 16). In 1 patient (no. 5), blood pressure was normal at baseline and remained unchanged throughout the study period. One partial responder (patient 10) showed worsening of all these clinical parameters (Supplementary Table S2) [36].

Nonresponders

In the nonresponder group, UFC increased in all 4 patients (no. 2, 4, 12, and 15) immediately after ketoconazole discontinuation despite increased doses of octreotide up to 30 mg/month (Fig. 2C). In 3 (patients 2, 4, and 15) out of 4 nonresponders, UFC levels were unchanged during follow-up compared to baseline. In 1 patient (no. 12), the UFC level at follow-up was doubled compared to baseline. The cortisol Pm/am ratio did not improve during treatment (P = .20). Three (patients 2, 4, and 12) of 4 nonresponders lost weight at follow-up. Blood pressure remained unchanged in all 4 patients (Supplementary Table S2) [36].

Ketoconazole-Cabergoline Combination Treatment

Finally, in 2 patients with baseline UFC levels of 2.31 and 1.55 ULN, hypercortisolism could not be controlled with ketoconazole monotherapy. The addition of cabergoline did not result in a normalization of UFC. Patients remained uncontrolled during the study period, and an alternative treatment modality was implemented.

In Vitro Studies

Corticotroph tumor tissue was available for the assessment of SST2 mRNA in 4 patients: 2 responders (patients 8 and 13), 1 partial responder (patient 5), and 1 nonresponder (patient 15) (Fig. 3) who underwent transsphenoidal surgery after the trial. Of these, all but 1 patient had normalized UFC levels before surgery. The nonresponder (patient 15) had slightly elevated UFC (1.22 times the ULN). SST2 mRNA expression was highest in the tissue of the 2 responder patients (patient 8, relative expression 0.803 and patient 13, 0.216 normalized to hprt). It is important to highlight that these SST2 mRNA expression values (0.803 and 0.216) were comparable to SST2 expression in GH-secreting tumors (mean of 0.27 ± 0.30, normalized to hprt, n = 10) as we have previously published [32]. Corticotroph tumor tissue of the partial responder (patient 5) also expressed SST2, albeit at a lower level than the 2 responder patients (0.146 normalized to hprt). SST2 expression was low in corticotroph tumor tissue of the nonresponder (0.08 normalized to hprt).

Paraffin-embedded tissue was available for IHC in 4 patients, of which 1 was a responder (patient 7), 2 were partial responders (patients 5 and 10), and 1 was a nonresponder (patient 15). Both mRNA and protein expression were available and assessed for 2 patients who were a partial responder (patient 5) and a nonresponder (patient 15). Before surgery, UFC levels were slightly elevated in 1 partial responder (patient 10) and the nonresponder (patient 15; UFC 1.17 and 1.22 times the ULN, respectively) but normal in the other patients. The IRS for SST2 was higher in the responder compared to the nonresponder patient (IRS 4 and 0, respectively) (Fig. 4). One partial responder (patient 5) had a high IRS for SST2 (IRS 8) with more than 80% of the adenoma cells staining positive for SST2. The second partial responder (patient 10) had no adenoma cells staining positive for SST2 (IRS 0). This patient had slightly elevated UFC levels prior to surgery (described earlier).

 

Representative immunohistochemistry of SST2 in corticotroph tumors. Representative photomicrographs of SST2 immunohistochemical staining in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 4 corticotroph adenomas of patients included in this study. (A) Adenoma patient 7 (responder) (IRS 4); (B) adenoma patient 5 (partial responder) (IRS 8); (C) adenoma patient 10 (partial responder) (IRS 0); (D) adenoma patient 15 (nonresponder) (IRS 0). (E) Positive control SST2 staining in human pancreatic islets. In most corticotroph adenomas, small blood vessels were SST2 positive (see arrows in panel D).

Figure 4.

Representative immunohistochemistry of SST2 in corticotroph tumors. Representative photomicrographs of SST2 immunohistochemical staining in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 4 corticotroph adenomas of patients included in this study. (A) Adenoma patient 7 (responder) (IRS 4); (B) adenoma patient 5 (partial responder) (IRS 8); (C) adenoma patient 10 (partial responder) (IRS 0); (D) adenoma patient 15 (nonresponder) (IRS 0). (E) Positive control SST2 staining in human pancreatic islets. In most corticotroph adenomas, small blood vessels were SST2 positive (see arrows in panel D).

Abbreviation: IRS, immunoreactivity scoring system.

Discussion

Selective downregulation of SST2 expression in corticotroph tumor cells by high cortisol levels is thought to impair the efficacy of SST2 preferring somatostatin analogs in the treatment of CD [2930]. The transcriptional regulation of SST2 is modulated by glucocorticoids (GC), as it was demonstrated that GC inhibits SST2 promoter activity through GC-responsive elements, resulting in a decrease in SST2 expression [29]. Because this process may be reversible, we examined in a prospective pilot study whether lowering cortisol production with ketoconazole can enhance inhibition of ACTH secretion via subsequent treatment with octreotide in patients with CD. The existing literature of clinical studies using octreotide in CD consisted of case reports (Table 1). This is the first prospective study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of octreotide in CD. Our data may indicate that the sequential strategy treatment with ketoconazole and octreotide can induce sustained biochemical remission in a subset of patients with mild CD.

Several in vivo and in vitro studies provide evidence that SST2 expression in corticotroph tumor cells can recover after suppression of cortisol production or antagonizing cortisol action [27333839]. As mentioned, we previously demonstrated that SST2 expression is higher in corticotroph tumors of patients operated under controlled cortisol production compared to those of patients with hypercortisolism at the time of operation [32]. However, SST2 expression was only significantly higher at the mRNA level but not at the protein level. Evidence that SST2 expression can also increase at the protein level was provided by case descriptions of 2 patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome [38]. In both patients, the source of ectopic ACTH production was initially occult with negative somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. However, after treatment with mifepristone, antagonizing the effects of cortisol at a tissue level, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy could identify a neuroendocrine lung tumor in both patients, indicating SST2 protein expression. This was recently confirmed by similar observations in 2 patients with an ACTH-producing neuroendocrine lung tumor [39]. In addition, in vitro studies with the selective GC receptor antagonist relacorilant demonstrated the reversal of GC-induced downregulation of SST2 expression in the AtT20 corticotroph tumor cell line [39]. Finally, indirect evidence comes from an older preliminary study in which a further decrease in UFC levels was observed in 4 ketoconazole-treated patients after the addition of octreotide. The ketoconazole dose could subsequently be reduced in 3 patients [27].

The sequential treatment with ketoconazole and octreotide in the present study led to a partial or complete response in 7 out of 11 patients, with 3 of them exhibiting sustained biochemical remission throughout the follow-up period. At the first stage, ketoconazole monotherapy led to normal UFC levels in 79% of the cases. This efficacy is higher compared to previous studies that reported an efficacy of approximately 50% to 60% and can be explained by the fact that the majority of patients had mild hypercortisolism [1140-43]. Additionally, the clinical benefit of controlling cortisol secretion was evident with the observed weight loss in most responders to ketoconazole.

Subsequently, the combined therapy (ketoconazole and octreotide) was able to maintain biochemical remission according to UFC levels. No additive effect was observed with add-on treatment during a period of 2 months of combined ketoconazole-octreotide therapy. Following this stage, ketoconazole was stopped, and treatment was continued with octreotide monotherapy that was able to maintain normal UFC levels in 3 (27%) patients. Since the majority of reported cases using octreotide for CD treatment showed failure to induce biochemical remission, as summarized in Table 1, these results suggest that, in a subset of patients, ketoconazole-induced biochemical remission may have indeed led to upregulation of SST2 with subsequent effectiveness of octreotide.

This is supported by the observed dose dependency in the response to octreotide in both the ketoconazole-octreotide combination phase and the octreotide monotherapy phase. In 2 patients treated with ketoconazole and octreotide, UFC levels increased above the ULN after initial normalization but returned to normal values after a dose increase of octreotide. In 2 of the 3 responders to octreotide monotherapy, an increased dose of octreotide was required, and effective, after an initial increase in UFC levels was observed following ketoconazole discontinuation. Of note, given the size of the present study, a starting dose of octreotide cannot be defined based on our data. A previous study showed that ketoconazole can inhibit ACTH secretion in rat corticotroph cells in vitro; therefore, central effects of ketoconazole in vivo cannot be fully excluded [44]. However, sustained normal UFC levels under octreotide monotherapy in 1 responder patient and the dose-dependent response to octreotide in 2 other responders suggest that a central residual effect of ketoconazole is unlikely to explain the response to octreotide.

Interestingly, among the 3 patients considered as responders based on the UFC levels, clinical improvement was observed in 2 patients in terms of weight loss, waist circumference, and blood pressure control. Notably, the small sample size and limited follow-up reduce our ability to assess the long-term clinical impact of the ketoconazole-octreotide sequential strategy.

A common feature of the 3 patients in whom the strategy was most effective is that they had mildly elevated UFC levels at baseline as compared to patients in whom the strategy failed. This is similar to what was observed in studies with another somatostatin analog, pasireotide, which has been shown to be more effective in patients with less severe hypercortisolism [1819]. It is important to acknowledge that octreotide has a safer side-effect profile as compared to pasireotide, which is known to induce or worsen hyperglycemia via inhibition of incretin release. Octreotide could, therefore, be a potentially interesting option to maintain remission in (mild) CD after induction therapy with a steroid synthesis inhibitor [31].

When analyzing the 4 nonresponders and 4 partial responders in the trial, in whom, despite ketoconazole effectively reducing cortisol secretion, octreotide monotherapy was unable to maintain normocortisolism, the reasons for a failed response remain speculative. It is possible that because of more severe baseline hypercortisolism in these patients, as compared to the responders, a longer duration of biochemical remission is necessary in order to restore SST2 expression to adequate levels. Alternatively, corticotroph tumors in these cases may not express an adequate amount of SST2, regardless of the cortisolemic state.

Expression of SST2, defined by either immunohistochemical or mRNA level, is positively correlated with octreotide efficacy in GH-secreting tumors [4546]. Accordingly, the 2 responder patients to octreotide in whom cortisol levels were normalized before surgery had higher SST2 mRNA expression compared to partial/nonresponder patients, and these SST2 mRNA expression levels were comparable to the levels in somatotroph tumors [32]. The strategy of lowering cortisol levels to increase SST2 expression may have contributed to octreotide efficacy in these patients. Accordingly, an intermediate level of SST2 mRNA was found in the partial responder, whereas the nonresponder patient had a low level of SST2 mRNA. Regarding SST2 protein expression, a responder patient had an intermediate level of SST2, which may explain the efficacy of octreotide treatment. Consistently, the nonresponder patient to octreotide had no SST2 expression as determined by IHC, which may be explained by preoperative hypercortisolism with concomitant effects on SST2 expression level (mRNA and protein). The partial responders had contradictory results, 1 with high and the other with no SST2 expression by IHC. The partial responder with no SST2 protein expression also had high cortisol levels, which may have contributed to this negative result.

The present study needs to be analyzed in light of its inherent limitations. The single-arm design and small sample size, ie, 14 patients with 3 full responders to octreotide, only permits a descriptive analysis without more robust statistics. This is an important limitation, even considering that, given the rarity of CD, the existing literature consists mostly of case reports. Additionally, the period of 9 months of follow-up limited our ability to more thoroughly appreciate the potential clinical benefits associated with the reduction of UFC levels observed with the sequential treatment strategy tested in this trial. The protocol included ACTH measurements every 3 months, so the impact of octreotide treatment on ACTH secretion was not evaluated in the present study. Finally, in corticotroph tumors, only in selected cases sufficient appropriate tissue was available for mRNA and protein analysis. Generally, adenoma tissue pieces in CD are (very) small, representing a challenge to obtaining enough tissue for molecular studies. This is a well-known problem with respect to in vitro studies with corticotroph adenomas.

In conclusion, a treatment strategy consisting of sequential treatment with ketoconazole to lower cortisol levels, followed by octreotide to maintain biochemical remission, may be effective in a subset of patients with mild CD. Additional studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm the long-term efficacy of this strategy for the medical treatment of CD.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for this manuscript.

Disclosures

R.A.F. received speakers fees and research grants from Recordati and Corcept.

Data Availability

Some or all datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Clinical Trial Information

Dutch Trial Register nr. NL37105.078.11.

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. See the journal About page for additional terms.