Medic Alert Bracelets

Posted on December 16, 2025 by MaryO

Since the last topic was about Adrenal Insufficiency, it seemed that a great next topic would be about Medic Alert Bracelets.

Many doctors insist that everyone who has had pituitary or adrenal surgery have a bracelet – and some will even tell patients what they should say on them.

While I was still a patient at the NIH (National Institutes of Health) after my pituitary surgery, I was given my first bracelet along with my kit in care of adrenal crisis.  I had to learn to give myself a shot before I could go home.

Now, my endo checks mine at every visit to be sure I’m wearing my bracelet and reads it to be sure it’s still legible and checks to see what the text says.

He feels that the bracelets – and he insists that they LOOK like medic alert bracelets, not disguised as jewelry – are life savers.

I’m not so sure – I read stories on the message boards that people have gone into AI (adrenal insufficiency and no one has ever looked at their bracelet.  That was certainly the case for young Sam.  Her mom had instructions everywhere, none were heeded and the situation rapidly turned disastrous.

…We have dealt with Addison’s for 7 years; but I have handled everything. Apparently the vials of solu-cortef with step-by-step instructions hanging on the bulletin board in the kitchen, medicine cabinet and in every vehicle somehow missed his attention…  (read the whole story at survive the journey: Stars Go Blue)

A Paramedic wrote on the message boards:

I’d like to add a couple things from the perspective of a Paramedic…

A lot of us are not taught about adrenal insufficiency during our education….nor do many of us (if any at all) have a protocol to administer Injectable for AI unless we are able to contact the ER doctor for permission. So…if any of you should have an AI crisis please gently nudge your paramedic to contact the receiving physician for permission to administer the medication. I know this sounds like a lot of responsibility on the part of the patient…but you have to realize that we’re taught to recognize the most common life threats and endocrine disorders (other than diabetes) most usually do not present with life threats (we all know that as cushing’s is more recognized that this will change)…and our protocols cover the most common life threats….so while we may recognize that you are hypotensive and need fluids (IV) and are sweaty, nauseated, decreased level of responsiveness etc…we are not equipped to deal with the actual cause unless you help educate us….

Also…please don’t get angry with us….if we are having problems understanding…just gently insist that a call be made to your doctor or the receiving ED (usually not feasible for us to call your doctor since they do not come to the phone for just anybody but if you have access to them, as many cushies do, it would be great to talk to them)…

Paramedicine is evolving….someday soon, hopefully, our education will include more diagnostic skills…untill just in the past 5 years or so we were NEVER to make a diagnosis at all…just treat the symptoms!!!! So there is hope out there for futher understanding of such a critical problem for those without adrenal (or asleep adrenals) glands….

The medical alert jewerly is a life-saver and we do look for it….

So, the questions for discussion are:

  • Do you have a medical alert bracelet
  • Does your doctor check on it or suggest proper wording.
  • If you have one, has any medical staff read it during a crisis
  • And… what does yours say?

Filed under: adrenal crisis, Cushing's, pituitary | Tagged: , , , , | 15 Comments »

Adrenal Crisis

Posted on December 8, 2025 by MaryO

Robin wrote a great blog post about Jackie and Sam dealing with Adrenal Crisis.  This is a very important article that all should read.  Be your own advocate!

New PDF! Managing Adrenal Insufficiency

New Podcast! Podcast: Adrenal Crisis

If left untreated, adrenal insufficiency can cause serious illness or death. But by working with their doctors and nurses, patients can learn how to manage this condition.

A Paramedic wrote on the message boards:

I’d like to add a couple things from the perspective of a Paramedic…

A lot of us are not taught about adrenal insufficiency during our education….nor do many of us (if any at all) have a protocol to administer Injectable for AI unless we are able to contact the ER doctor for permission. So…if any of you should have an AI crisis please gently nudge your paramedic to contact the receiving physician for permission to administer the medication. I know this sounds like a lot of responsibility on the part of the patient…but you have to realize that we’re taught to recognize the most common life threats and endocrine disorders (other than diabetes) most usually do not present with life threats (we all know that as cushing’s is more recognized that this will change)…and our protocols cover the most common life threats….so while we may recognize that you are hypotensive and need fluids (IV) and are sweaty, nauseated, decreased level of responsiveness etc…we are not equipped to deal with the actual cause unless you help educate us….

Also…please don’t get angry with us….if we are having problems understanding…just gently insist that a call be made to your doctor or the receiving ED (usually not feasible for us to call your doctor since they do not come to the phone for just anybody but if you have access to them, as many cushies do, it would be great to talk to them)…

Paramedicine is evolving….someday soon, hopefully, our education will include more diagnostic skills…untill just in the past 5 years or so we were NEVER to make a diagnosis at all…just treat the symptoms!!!! So there is hope out there for futher understanding of such a critical problem for those without adrenal (or asleep adrenals) glands….

The medical alert jewerly is a life-saver and we do look for it….

Be sure to print this page to carry with you.

From the NIH. This information was developed by the patient care staff of the Clinical Center to help patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) understand their condition and how to take care of it. It explains what causes adrenal insufficiency and how it can be controlled. If left untreated, adrenal insufficiency can cause serious illness or death. But by working with their doctors and nurses, patients can learn how to manage this condition.

National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Information Service

6 Information Way
Bethesda, MD 20892–3569
Phone: 1–888–828–0904
TTY: 1–866–569–1162
Fax: 1–703–738–4929
Email: // <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy41985 = 'endoandmeta' + '@';
addy41985 = addy41985 + 'info' + '.' + 'niddk' + '.' + 'nih' + '.' + 'gov';
var addy_text41985 = 'endoandmeta' + '@' + 'info' + '.' + 'niddk' + '.' + 'nih' + '.' + 'gov';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy_text41985 );
document.write( ‘‘ );
//n
// –>
// ]]>endoandmeta@info.niddk.nih.gov // <![CDATA[
document.write( '‘ );
// ]]>This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it // <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Internet: http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/

The National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Information Service is an information dissemination service of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). The NIDDK is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The NIDDK conducts and supports biomedical research. As a public service the NIDDK has established information services to increase knowledge and understanding about health and disease among patients, health professionals and the public.

Publications produced by the NIDDK are carefully reviewed by both NIDDK scientists and outside experts.

This publication is not copyrighted. The NIDDK encourages users of this publication to duplicate and distribute as many copies as desired.

From http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/creutz/alert.htm

DebMV suggested that you should have a Medic Alert bracelet from medicalert.org

Toll free number in the USA is: by phone 7 days a week, 24 hours a day: 888-633-4298
209-668-3333 from outside the U.S.

Lorrie got this important info for us.

Alternative names:

adrenal crisis; Addisonian crisis; acute adrenal insufficiency

Definition:

An abrupt, life-threatening state caused by insufficient cortisol, a hormone produced and released by the adrenal gland.

Causes, incidence, and risk factors:

The two adrenal glands are located on top of the kidneys. They consist of the outer portion, called the cortex, and the inner portion, called the medulla. The cortex produces three types of hormones, which are called corticosteroids. The androgens and estrogens affect sexual development and reproduction. The glucocorticoids maintain glucose regulation, suppress the immune response, and provide for the response to stress (cortisol). The mineralocorticoids regulate sodium and potassium balance. These hormones are essential for life.

Acute adrenal crisis is an emergency caused by decreased cortisol. The crisis may occur in a person with Addison’s disease, or as the first sign of adrenal insufficiency. More uncommonly, it may be caused by a pituitary gland disorder. It may also be caused by sudden withdrawal of corticosteroids, removal or injury of the adrenal glands, or destruction of the pituitary gland. Risk factors are stress, trauma, surgery, or infection in a person with Addison’s disease, or injury or trauma to the adrenal glands or the pituitary gland. The incidence is 4 out of 100,000 people.

Prevention:

People who have Addison’s disease should be taught to recognize signs of potential stress that may precipitate an acute adrenal crisis (cause it to occur suddenly and unexpectedly). Most people with Addison’s disease are taught to give themselves an emergency injection of hydrocortisone in times of stress. It is important for the individual with Addison’s disease to always carry a medical identification card that states the type of medication and the proper dose needed in case of an emergency. Never omit medication. If unable to retain medication due to vomiting, notify the health care provider.

Symptoms:

  • headache
  • profound weakness
  • fatigue
  • slow, sluggish, lethargic movement
  • nausea
  • vomiting
  • low blood pressure
  • dehydration
  • high fever
  • chills shaking
  • confusion or coma
  • darkening of the skin
  • rapid heart rate
  • joint pain
  • abdominal pain
  • unintentional weight loss
  • rapid respiratory rate
  • unusual and excessive sweating on face and/or palms
  • skin rash or lesion may be present
  • flank pain
  • appetite, loss

Signs and tests:

  • An ACTH (cortrosyn) stimulation test shows low cortisol.
  • The cortisol level is low.
  • The fasting blood sugar may be low.
  • The serum potassium is elevated.
  • The serum sodium is decreased.
  • This disease may also alter the results of the following tests:
    • sodium, urine
    • 17-hydroxycorticosteroids

Treatment:

In adrenal crisis, an intravenous or intramuscular injection of hydrocortisone (an injectable corticosteroid) must be given immediately. Supportive treatment of low blood pressure is usually necessary. Hospitalization is required for adequate treatment and monitoring. Low blood pressure may be treated with intravenous fluids. If infection is the cause of the crisis, antibiotic therapy is indicated.

Expectations (prognosis):

Death may occur due to overwhelming shock if early treatment is not provided.

Complications:

  • shock
  • coma
  • seizures

Filed under: adrenal, adrenal crisis, Cushing's, podcast | Tagged: , , , | 2 Comments »

A Preliminary Model to Tailor Osilodrostat In Patients With Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH)-Dependent Cushing’s syndrome

Posted on October 10, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, osilodrostat has become one of the most commonly used steroidogenesis inhibitors in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. The starting dose is usually determined based on the product characteristics, the prescriber’s experience, and cortisol levels. However, no study has attempted to determine whether there was a dose–response relationship between osilodrostat and cortisol reduction. In this study, we developed a preliminary kinetic–pharmacodynamic model to tailor osilodrostat in patients with Adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH)-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. We first analyzed the decrease in cortisol 48 hours after initiation or dose change of osilodrostat in 18 patients. Simulations were then performed for different doses of osilodrostat to evaluate the variation in cortisol concentrations. Our results report the first dose–response relationship between osilodrostat dose and cortisol levels, which should be helpful in identifying the optimal dosing regimen in patients with Cushing’s syndrome and in individualizing treatment to approximate a nychthemeral rhythm.

osilodrostat, Cushing’s syndrome, Cushing’s disease, cortisol, adrenal insufficiency
Issue Section:

Brief Report

Significance

The current preliminary study is a first step in trying to better understand the effect of osilodrostat on cortisol, which should help determine the optimal dose for each patient.

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome is a rare condition in which increased cortisol levels lead to a wide range of comorbidities and increased mortality. Surgery is usually regarded as the first-line and most effective treatment.1 In some cases, cortisol-lowering drugs are necessary, mainly after failed surgery.2,3 Among several steroidogenesis inhibitors such as ketoconazole and metyrapone,4,5 osilodrostat, which acts through inhibition of 11β-hydroxylase, is now being considered an effective drug in controlling cortisol hypersecretion. Initially designed as a CYP11B2 inhibitor, the study by Ménard et al.6 involving both animal models and healthy human subjects showed that osilodrostat reduced cortisol levels from a dose of 1 mg/day, while lower doses exerted an anti-aldosterone effect. Since then, several clinical trials and retrospective studies emphasized its efficacy in all etiologies of Cushing’s syndrome.7-9 While the usual recommended starting dose is 2 mg twice a day, precise studies on the short-term effect of osilodrostat on plasma cortisol are lacking. These data could, however, be of interest to tailor the treatment. Moreover, baseline urinary free cortisol (UFC) level is not able to predict response to osilodrostat.10 Taking advantage of serial cortisol measurements performed in inpatient clinics in our center at the time osilodrostat became available, we developed a pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic model of plasma cortisol variation as a function of osilodrostat dose in patients with Adrenocorticotropin-hormone (ACTH)-dependent Cushing’s syndrome.

Patients and methods

Clinical data and hormonal measurements

We retrospectively included patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, who had serial measurements of plasma cortisol (every 4 hours for 24 hours) before and after the first osilodrostat dose between 2019 and 2024. These measurements were part of our standard of care approach when osilodrostat became available in our tertiary expert center as a thorough evaluation of the efficacy and tolerance of a new drug. The initial dose ranged from 2 to 15 mg/day, depending on the severity of hypercortisolism. Subsequently, osilodrostat dose was gradually adjusted based on the successive cortisol measurements described above. Sex, age at diagnosis, and etiologies were recorded, as well as plasma cortisol measurements 48 hours after the initiation or any change in the osilodrostat dose and time elapsed since change of dose and last administration were recorded. All plasma cortisol measurements were performed with the same Elecsys II Cortisol, Cobas (Roche Diagnostics) assay in the hormonal laboratory of our center; cross-reactivity with 11-deoxycortisol is 4.9%. According to our institutional policy, this retrospective study did not require specific signed informed consent from patients as the data collected were anonymized. It was thus approved by the Ethics Committee of Assistance Publique—Hopitaux de Marseille (RGPD PADS reference RUXXX2). The current study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Pharmacokinetics and statistical analysis

The pharmacodynamic parameters of osilodrostat on cortisol concentrations were analyzed using a kinetic–pharmacodynamic (PD) model in the software Nonlinear Mixed Effects Modeling version 7.4 (NONMEM Icon Development Solutions, Ellicott City, MD, United States). PK analysis from a previously published study6 was used to predict plasma concentration in our patients. The PK parameters were described in the article, and mean concentration values were obtained by digitizing the graph of osilodrostat vs time using the software WebPlotDigitizer version 4.2.11 With these data, a one-compartment population PK model was used to predict osilodrostat concentrations for different dosing regimens. Direct and indirect relationship between osilodrostat-predicted concentration and variation of cortisol concentrations were evaluated to consider a delay. The variation of cortisol concentrations was calculated with reference to a session without treatment. Several functions were tested to describe the relationship such as linear and sigmoidal. Model selection and evaluation were done by the likelihood ratio test (objective function), goodness-of-fit plots (observed vs predicted variation of cortisol concentrations, observed vs individual predictions, normalized prediction distribution errors vs time and variation of cortisol predictions), bootstrap, and visual predictive checks. Graphical analysis was performed with the R software version 4.4.012 using the ggplot2 package.13 Simulations were performed for different doses of osilodrostat to evaluate the variation on cortisol concentrations using the package rxode2.14

Results

Of the patients who were prescribed osilodrostat at least once between 2019 and 2024, 18 were presenting ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, 12 women (66.6%) and 6 men (33.3%). Mean age was 53.2 ± 15 years. The cause of Cushing’s syndrome was Cushing’s disease in 16 patients (88.9%), ectopic ACTH secretion in 1 patient (5.6%), and ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism of uncertain diagnosis in 1 patient (5.6%). Clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. It should be noted that none of the patients included were Asian.

 

 

Table 1.

Open in new tab

Clinical characteristics of patients with all included patients and differentiated according to gender.

All patientsa Women Men
Age at diagnosis 53.2 ± 15 54 ± 17.2 51.5 ± 10.5
Weight 81.7 ± 13.7 79.5 ± 12.7 86.2 ± 15.6
% of CD 88.9 83.3 100
ULN of 24 hour UFC 4.4 ± 8.3 5.5 ± 10.3 2.5 ± 1.8
Osilodrostat starting dose 3.3 ± 2.2 3.7 ± 2.4 2.5 ± 1.4
Cortisol before osilodrostat intake 422.9 ± 159.2 414.7 ± 176.6 439.4 ± 130.7
Cortisol 4 hour after osilodrostat 404 ± 165.6 408.2 ± 200.1 395.5 ± 70.8

 

Abbreviations: CD, Cushing’s disease; ULN, upper limit range; UFC, urinary free cortisol.

aOf note, none of the included patients were Asian.

In their article, Ménard et al.6 showed that the dose–exposure relationship was not strictly proportional. A one-compartment model was enhanced by increasing the relative bioavailability with the dose and was estimated that the dose resulting in a 50% increase in bioavailability was 1.06 mg. The PK parameters derived from Ménard et al.6 were fixed and used to predict osilodrostat concentration in our patients. A direct relationship between the predicted osilodrostat concentrations and variation of cortisol concentrations (%) gave a better fit than an indirect model. The drug effect was modeled with the following sigmoidal function (Eq. 1);

(1)

where Imax is the maximal inhibition and IC50 is the apparent half-maximal inhibitory concentration.

The estimated PD parameters were IC50 and Imax. Their values as well as the relative standard errors (RSE%) and the corresponding bootstrap IC50 are shown in Table 2. Final parameters were used to simulate n = 500 profiles following a single dose of osilodrostat.

 

 

 

Table 2.

Open in new tab

Pharmacodynamic parameters of osilodrostat’s effects on the variation of cortisol concentrations.

Parameters Unit Estimation RSE% Bootstrap
0.025 0.975
KA (fixed)a 1/hour 4.03 — — —
CL/F (fixed)a L/hour 18.3 — — —
V/F (fixed)a L 125 — —
Imax % 44.5 18.7 12.51 90.9
IC50 mg/L 0.011 37.4 0.0001 0.10
Interindividual variability (ω)
 Imax 0.40 30.9 0.003 1.86
 IC50 3.78 41.0 0.003 9.22
Residual unexplained variability (σ)
 Additive % 23.8 12.2 18.2 29.9

 

Abbreviations: CL/F, apparent clearance; IC50, osilodrostat concentration associated with half the maximal inhibition of the cortisol variation; Imax, maximum inhibitory effect of osilodrostat on the variation of cortisol; KA, first-order absorption rate constant; RSE, relative standard error; V/F, apparent volume of distribution.

 

aAdapted from Ménard et al.6

The effects on plasma cortisol variation are depicted in Figure 1. Cortisol concentration declines during the first hour after taking osilodrostat, from 24% for a 1 mg dose to over 42% for a 20 mg dose. Thereafter, from the first hour onward, cortisol increases progressively, with loss of treatment efficacy occurring around the 10th-15th hour for 1 and 2 mg, while for doses above 5 mg, a moderate effect persists over the following hours. Figure 2 shows the variation in cortisol concentration for a 2 mg dose, with median decrease in cortisol variation of 31%, ranging from 0% to 67.5%, with, as mentioned above, a maximum effect 1 hour after osilodrostat intake, and a progressive increase in cortisol levels, mainly during the 12 hours following treatment. The same analysis for 10 mg revealed a median reduction in cortisol of 38%, ranging from 5% to 80%. Figure 3 describes the relationship between osilodrostat concentration and cortisol variation, showing that the maximum effect corresponds to the maximum concentration and that a decrease in osilodrostat concentration results in an increase in cortisol level.

Relationship between time since last administration of osilodrostat and cortisol concentrations.

Figure 1.

Relationship between time since last administration of osilodrostat and cortisol concentrations.

Open in new tabDownload slide

Visual predictive variation on cortisol concentrations following 2 or 10 mg osilodrostat administration.

Figure 2.

Visual predictive variation on cortisol concentrations following 2 or 10 mg osilodrostat administration.

Open in new tabDownload slide

Relation between osilodrostat concentration and cortisol variation.

Figure 3.

Relation between osilodrostat concentration and cortisol variation.

Open in new tabDownload slide

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that attempts to define a dose/efficacy relationship between osilodrostat dose and the variation of plasma cortisol. First, our results suggest that the effect of osilodrostat appears immediately after the peak of concentration, 1 hour after treatment intake, which highlights the parallel evolution of osilodrostat and cortisol concentrations. This is unusual, as typically effect peak takes few hours, following concentration peak.15 The relationship between osilodrostat concentration and the effect on cortisol is not linear but sigmoidal with a rapid increase in concentrations producing a rapid significant effect, leading to a maximal effect. Because elimination is a slower process than absorption, the effect’s decline will also be slower: this means that efficiency remains stable during the first 5 hours, with a further progressive increase of cortisol and a loss of efficiency around 10-15 hours after intake. This confirms the need for two intakes per day, with one early in the morning and the other 12 hours later in the evening. In addition, even if our simulation suggests a wide interindividual variability, we were able to determine the impact of different doses of osilodrostat on the percent decrease in plasma cortisol levels. For instance, 20 mg osilodrostat leads to an estimated 42% decrease in cortisol concentration. Interestingly, Ferrari et al.16 recently showed that patients controlled with two doses of osilodrostat for at least 1 month had the same efficacy with a single intake (combing both doses) at 4 or 7 Pm. This is quite surprising and will need to be evaluated in future studies: our preliminary model could give more precise information on this point.

Cushing’s syndrome is also characterized by a loss of circadian rhythm leading to increased comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease.17,18 This is why 24 hour UFC can only be considered an imperfect marker of glucocorticoid overexposure even though it is an easy-to-use marker, as exemplified by its use in all the clinical trials performed on cortisol-lowering drugs.7,8,10,19 Predicting the efficacy of osilodrostat on plasma cortisol might be helpful to tailor the treatment as a titrating approach. Of note, some studies suggested that there might be an inpatient variability of cortisol secretion in Cushing’s syndrome,20 and this might account for a bias in our results. However, none of our patients had cyclical Cushing’s syndrome. Moreover, 12 patients in our cohort had at least two cortisol cycles (every 4 hours during the day) before starting treatment. A comparison of these two cycles using Student’s t-test showed no significant difference (P = .7), indicating no obvious spontaneous variability. Our preliminary report gives interesting insights into the maximal efficacy expected for a single dose of osilodrostat, thus defining the initial dosage needed to rapidly control hypercortisolism, as opposed to the dose currently recommended by the manufacturer (2 mg twice daily). Thus, our results could help define an optimal dose in the morning, but also in the evening, with the aim of re-establishing a circadian profile. This will, however, have to be confirmed on an interventional study focusing on comorbidities, quality of life and their potential improvements while using this PK model.

The main limitation of this proof-of-concept study is the large CI. This may be due to the relatively low number of patients and the fact that cortisol was measured every 4 hours instead of every hour, but also to the large variability in efficacy between subjects. Due to the number of patients included in the analysis, it was not possible to investigate further if a covariate, such as the gender, may explain these differences between individuals. It is important to highlight that although our model predicts cortisol levels 1 hour post intake as the most reliable predictor of future efficacy, cortisol measurements were taken every 4 hours. Thus, this finding should be confirmed in prospective studies with more frequent cortisol measurements, particularly 1 hour after osilodrostat administration. While the kinetic–pharmacodynamic approach used in this study can present with some inherent limitations, this type of approach is regularly used to define the modalities of use for a medication in a new indication. A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling allows the use of data from the routine clinical follow-up of patients. This method is thus effective and particularly well-suited for sparse data. Finally, a larger study could include closer measurements of cortisol. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the best method for avoiding cross-reactivity with steroid precursors and could be used for these measurements. However, we used the Elecsys Cortisol II Immunoassay, which shows <5% cross-reactivity with 11-deoxycortisol; thus, our results are credible.

In conclusion, we designed a kinetic–pharmacodynamic model to adapt osilodrostat in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Our model shows that cortisol level 1 hour after treatment is the best indicator of future efficacy. Moreover, depending on the initial cortisol level and the goal to be achieved, different doses should be prescribed. Despite wide inter-patient variability, we believe our model provides insight into the minimal dose necessary to decrease cortisol levels and the maximal efficacy expected for a given dose. Thus, it should help physicians tailor the treatment to reach maximal efficacy in the shortest possible time. The next step will be to analyze whether this percent decrease remains stable on a long-term basis or becomes more important with time, as suggested by some clinical cases showing delayed adrenal insufficiency on stable doses of osilodrostat.21

Authors’ contributions

Cecilia Piazzola (Conceptualization [equal], Formal analysis [equal], Writing—original draft [equal]), Frederic Castinetti (Conceptualization [equal], Formal analysis [equal], Writing—review & editing [equal]), Katharina von Fabeck (Conceptualization [equal], Writing—review & editing [equal]), and Nicolas Simon (Conceptualization [equal], Methodology [equal], Supervision [equal], Validation [equal], Writing—original draft [equal], Writing—review & editing [equal])

Funding

This work received an unrestricted educational grant from Recordati Rare Diseases.

To see the references and the original article, please go here: https://academic.oup.com/ejendo/article/193/4/K11/8255719?login=false

 

Filed under: adrenal crisis, Clinical trials, Cushing's, pituitary, Treatments | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

Cushing’s Syndrome in a Young Woman Due to Prolonged Betamethasone Nasal Drop Use

Posted on August 11, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

Background

Cushing’s syndrome is an uncommon but serious condition caused by long-term exposure to elevated cortisol levels, which is usually iatrogenic in origin. Although systemic corticosteroids are the most frequent agents, the association of intranasal corticosteroids with this condition is remarkably rare.

Case presentation

This report is about a 21-year-old Iranian woman using betamethasone nasal drops for nasal obstruction. The patient presented with weight gain, Amenorrhea, mood disturbances, red purplish striae, and mild hirsutism. Hormonal assessments revealed suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates the underappreciated systemic effects of intranasal betamethasone to induce Cushing’s syndrome. It serves as a pivotal reminder of the need for vigilance in prescribing practices and reinforces the importance of early diagnosis to ensure favorable patient outcomes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is an endocrine disease caused by long-term or high-dose glucocorticoid use [1]. Although iatrogenic cases are commonly associated with oral or injectable glucocorticoids [2], few reports described CS after the use of intranasal steroid sprays (INS) such as betamethasone in adults [3,4,5,6,7]. Currently, INS is widely used for managing conditions such as allergic rhinitis, nasal polyposis, and other upper airway disorders owing to their localized effects and limited systemic absorption [8, 9]. However, prolonged use, high doses, or using potent formulations can lead to significant systemic absorption, resulting in Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis suppression, and frank CS [10]. Betamethasone nasal spray, a cornerstone in the treatment of nasal congestion, has the potential for systemic absorption by the nasal mucosa, particularly with prolonged or excessive use [11].

This report presents the case of a young woman who developed CS following the overuse of betamethasone nasal drops. It also highlights the importance of detailed patient histories when diagnosing CS and highlights the critical need to educate patients on the proper use and potential risks of steroid therapies to prevent complications. This case report adheres to the case report (CARE) guidelines [12].

Case presentation

This is the case of a 21-year-old Iranian female who presented with a history of rapid weight gain (30 kg in 8 months), irregular menstrual cycles, and significant mood changes. Her body mass index (BMI) was calculated at 40.07 kg/m2, classifying her as obese, and her blood pressure was recorded at 115/75 mmHg. In addition, she exhibited red–purple striae on her abdomen and limbs and mild hirsutism (modified Ferriman–Gallwey Score (FGS) score = 10), prompting admission for further evaluation after multiple outpatient visits yielded no definitive diagnosis.

Figure 1 is a clinical photograph (with patient consent) or an illustration of the red–purple striae.

Fig. 1

figure 1

Clinical photograph showcasing the red–purplish striae on the patient’s abdomen, arms, and lower limbs

Upon admission, the patient’s history revealed prolonged use of betamethasone 0.1% 1 mg/mL nasal drops, administered at a daily dosage of 5 cc, in combination with oxymetazoline (a sympathomimetic nasal preparation) at a daily dosage of 1 cc, over approximately 12 months, to address nasal obstruction. Her symptoms began 6 months after starting the nasal drops. Further medication history revealed no other corticosteroid use. Notably, the patient had a past diagnosis of polycystic ovary (PCO) syndrome made on the basis of Rotterdam 2003 criteria (oligomenorrhea since menarche and clinically androgen excess) but did not undergo treatment or maintain laboratory records.

A detailed hormonal evaluation was undertaken. Morning plasma cortisol less than 0.05 µg/dL and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) less than 5 (10–56 pg/mL) measurements were abnormally low. Her 24-hour urine-free cortisol concentrations of 1.04 µg/24 h were significantly reduced, indicating suppression of the HPA axis secondary to prolonged exogenous corticosteroid exposure. All tests were repeated several times by endocrinologists during the time course of disease manifestations.

Table 1 summarizes the hormonal test results to clearly display the abnormalities.

Table 1 Hormonal and biochemical test results with reference values

Imaging studies before admission included a computed tomography (CT) scan of the adrenal glands, which showed that both adrenal glands were of normal size. However, a dynamic pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an 11 mm pituitary gland, despite there being no rationale for imaging studies in this scenario.

The patient was counseled extensively about the condition, and betamethasone nasal drops were discontinued immediately. Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) consultation revealed normal findings and the psychiatric team diagnosed her with major depressive disorder (MDD). She was discharged on 15 mg prednisolone with a structured tapering plan to allow for gradual recovery of adrenal function and to prevent acute adrenal insufficiency. Follow-up appointments were scheduled to monitor her clinical progress and re-evaluate her HPA axis recovery.

Discussion

This case highlights the rare but significant occurrence of iatrogenic CS secondary to prolonged use of intranasal betamethasone. Although oral corticosteroids are well-known to cause HPA axis suppression, INS is generally considered safer owing to their localized effects and lowering systemic absorption side effects. However, the associated potential of systemic absorption in INS remains a concern [13]. As demonstrated in this case, prolonged use of potent formulations such as betamethasone can lead to significant systemic effects, particularly when administered inappropriately or at high doses.

Betamethasone nasal drops, although effective for treating nasal congestion and inflammation [14, 15], carry a potential risk of systemic absorption through the nasal mucosa. Factors, such as prolonged use [6, 16, 17], and high potency [18], can significantly increase systemic bioavailability. R. J. Perry et al. [19] in study of seven children highlights that even patients receiving doses within conventional safety ranges may exhibit varying sensitivity to glucocorticoids, leading to symptomatic adrenal suppression or glucocorticoid excess. Unlike newer corticosteroid compounds, such as fluticasone or mometasone, which undergo extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver, betamethasone exhibits minimal hepatic metabolism, contributing to its prolonged systemic activity [20, 21]. This pharmacokinetic profile underscores the need for careful regulation and monitoring of its use, even in ostensibly localized therapies.

The clinical manifestations in this patient, including central obesity, striae, hirsutism, and mood changes, were classic features of CS and guided the diagnostic process [22]. Scutelnicu et al. [23] reported a case of a patient in the second trimester of pregnancy who, owing to chronic sinusitis, underwent intranasal betamethasone spray therapy. The patient manifested extensive striae on the lower limbs, as well as edema in the legs, arms, and face, accompanied by a weight gain of 22 kg over 3 months. After switching the patient’s treatment to an alpha-1 adrenergic agonist spray, the condition was managed uneventfully without any symptoms of adrenal insufficiency.

Requesting imaging assessments, including a CT scan and MRI, as a first step further complicated the diagnostic process. This highlights a common diagnostic pitfall: the use of imaging as an initial approach can lead to the discovery of incidentalomas, which may misdirect clinical attention. Such findings risk overshadowing the primary etiology of the condition, potentially resulting in misdiagnosis or delayed treatment. This emphasizes the importance of prioritizing functional assessments over imaging in the early diagnostic workup to avoid unwarranted diagnostic confusion and ensure accurate identification of the underlying pathology.

Management involved the immediate cessation of betamethasone nasal drops and initiation of a structured tapering regimen with prednisolone to support adrenal recovery. The importance of stress-dose precautions during intercurrent illnesses was emphasized, alongside comprehensive patient education to prevent future misuse of corticosteroids. The gradual improvement in adrenal function during follow-up highlights the reversibility of glucocorticoid-induced adrenal suppression with appropriate intervention.

Conclusion

This case underscores several critical lessons. First, it emphasizes the importance of heightened awareness among healthcare providers regarding the potential systemic effects of topical corticosteroids, particularly potent formulations such as betamethasone. Second, it highlights the need for thorough history-taking and detailed patient education to prevent corticosteroid misuse. This report contributes to the limited body of literature on iatrogenic CS from intranasal corticosteroids, particularly in adults. Documenting the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and successful management of this case, provides valuable insights into preventing, recognizing, and treating similar cases. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between therapeutic benefit and potential harm in corticosteroid therapy and advocates for ongoing research to establish safer prescribing practices.

Data availability

The data analyzed and generated in this study can be accessed through the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CS:
Cushing’s syndrome
INS:
Intranasal corticosteroids
HPA axis:
Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis
BMI:
Body mass index
FGS:
Ferriman–Gallwey Score
PCO:
Polycystic ovary
ACTH:
Adrenocorticotropic hormone
CT:
Computed tomography
MRI:
Magnetic resonance imaging
ENT:
Ear, nose, and throat
MDD:
Major depressive disorder

References

  1. Cristante J, Chabre O. Factitious, or iatrogenic but unexpected Cushing’s syndrome. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2023;84(3):370–2.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):913–27.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scutelnicu A, Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu AM, Gica N, Botezatu R, Peltecu G, et al. Iatrogenic cushing’s syndrome as a consequence of nasal use of betamethasone spray during pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol. 2020;16(4):511–7.

    CAS Google Scholar

  4. Sakamoto M, Morita K, Okamura E, Uchino T, Okamoto K, Ozawa Y, et al. A case of iatrogenic cushing syndrome due to overuse of nasal steriod and concurrent administration of clarithromycin. Teikyo Med J. 2018;41(4):161–8.

    Google Scholar

  5. Nutting CM, Page SR. Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome due to nasal betamethasone: a problem not to be sniffed at! Postgrad Med J. 1995;71(834):231–2.

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  6. Stevens DJ. Cushing’s syndrome due to the abuse of betamethasone nasal drops. J Laryngol Otol. 1988;102(3):219–21.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dow A, Yu R, Carmichael J. Too little or too much corticosteroid? Coexisting adrenal insufficiency and Cushing’s syndrome from chronic, intermittent use of intranasal betamethasone. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2013;2013:13–0036.

    Google Scholar

  8. Bachert C, Desrosiers MY, Hellings PW, Laidlaw TM. The role of biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(3):1099–106.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bachert C, Han JK, Wagenmann M, Hosemann W, Lee SE, Backer V, et al. EUFOREA expert board meeting on uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and biologics: definitions and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(1):29–36.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Quddusi S, Browne P, Toivola B, Hirsch IB. Cushing syndrome due to surreptitious glucocorticoid administration. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(3):294–6.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Grayson JW, Harvey RJ. Topical corticosteroid irrigations in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019;9(S1):S9–15.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Global Adv Health Med. 2013;2(5):38–43.

    Google Scholar

  13. McDonnell J, Weller K, Pien LC. Safety of intranasal steroids: an updated perspective. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020;20(11):69.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Scadding GK. Other anti-inflammatory uses of intranasal corticosteroids in upper respiratory inflammatory diseases. Allergy. 2000;55(s62):19–23.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Chong LY, Head K, Hopkins C, Philpott C, Burton MJ, Schilder AG. Different types of intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4(4):Cd011993.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Findlay CA, Macdonald JF, Wallace AM, Geddes N, Donaldson MD. Childhood Cushing’s syndrome induced by betamethasone nose drops, and repeat prescriptions. BMJ. 1998;317(7160):739–40.

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  17. Reynolds C, Agrawal P, McCann A, O’Sullivan T, Chroinin MN, O’Riordan SMP. Cushing syndrome and adrenal insufficiency induced by high dose prolonged intranasal betamethasone. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104:A275.

    Google Scholar

  18. Oluwayemi IO, Oduwole AO, Oyenusi E, Onyiriuka AN, Abdullahi M, Fakeye-Udeogu OB, et al. Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome in children following nasal steroid. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17:237.

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  19. Perry RJ, Findlay CA, Donaldson MDC. Cushing’s syndrome, growth impairment, and occult adrenal suppression associated with intranasal steroids. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87(1):45–8.

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  20. Matera MG, Rinaldi B, Calzetta L, Rogliani P, Cazzola M. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled corticosteroids for asthma treatment. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2019;58: 101828.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Krzyzanski W, Milad MA, Jobe AH, Peppard T, Bies RR, Jusko WJ. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of intramuscular and oral dexamethasone and betamethasone in Indian women. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2021;48(2):261–72.

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  22. Savas M, Mehta S, Agrawal N, van Rossum EFC, Feelders RA. Approach to the patient: diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(11):3162–74.

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  23. Scutelnicu A, Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu AM, Gica N, Botezatu R, Peltecu G, et al. Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome as a consequence of nasal use of betamethasone spray during pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2020;16(4):511–7.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammadsadra Shamohammadi

  2. M.D., Endocrinologist Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences at Rasool Akram General Hospital, Tehran, Iran

    Delaram Eskandari

  3. Professor of Endocrinology Department of Endocrinology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Amir Ziaee

  4. Assistant Professor of Endocrinology & Metabolism Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital Iran University of Medical Sciences Medical Doctor at Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Seyed Hossein Samadanifard

  5. Assistant Professor of Endocrinology & Metabolism Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Haleh Chehrehgosha

  6. M.D., Endocrinologist Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences at Rasool Akram General Hospital, Tehran, Iran

    Amir Hossein Ghanooni

Contributions

MS and DE wrote the original draft; AZ and SHS collected the data. DE and HC were the patient’s doctors; MS and AHG reviewed, edited, and supervised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delaram Eskandari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences under approval number IR.IUMS.REC.1404.208.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Filed under: adrenal crisis, Cushing's, Rare Diseases | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Adrenal Insufficiency May Be Misdiagnosed as Anxiety

Posted on November 23, 2024 by MaryO

The hormone cortisol is produced by the adrenal glands, so adrenal insufficiency (also called Addison’s disease) is caused when the adrenal glands do not produce cortisol normally. Low cortisol can actually cause anxiety and depression, so some patients may really have anxiety — though doctors need to do further testing and/or evaluation to see that it is caused by their hormone levels, not a mental illness.

“I have adrenal insufficiency, which can cause depression and anxiety as a sign and symptom of low cortisol. After attempting hospitalization for depression, we found that I’d been living on almost undetectable cortisol for at least a year,” Sarah Reilley said. “Now that I’m on hydrocortisone replacement, my depression and anxiety are nearly gone and serve to warn me when my cortisol is dangerously low! I’m really lucky to be alive.”

Read about other conditions that may be misdiagnosed as anxiety here: https://themighty.com/topic/chronic-illness/misdiagnosed-anxiety-symptoms/

Filed under: Addison's disease, adrenal, adrenal crisis | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Next Page »