Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cushing’s Disease: Single-Center Experience in 70 Patients

Posted on October 16, 2023 by MaryO

Context: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a modern precision radiotherapy technique for the treatment of the pituitary adenoma.

Objective: Aim to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of IMRT in treating Cushing’s Disease (CD).

Methods: 70 of 115 patients with CD treated with IMRT at our institute from April 2012 to August 2021 were included in the study. The radiation doses were usually 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions. After IMRT, endocrine evaluations were performed every 6 months and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) annually. Endocrine remission was defined as suppression of 1 mg dexamethasone test (DST) or normal 24-hour urinary free cortisol level (24hUFC). The outcome of endocrine remission, endocrine recurrence, tumor control and complications were retrieved from medical record.

Results: At a median follow-up time of 36.8 months, the endocrine remission rate at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years were 28.5%, 50.2%, 62.5% and 74.0%, respectively. The median time to remission was 24 months (95%CI: 14.0-34.0). Endocrine recurrence was found in 5 patients (13.5%) till the last follow-up. The recurrence-free rate at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after endocrine remission was 98.2%, 93.9%, 88.7% and 88.7%, respectively. The tumor control rate was 98%. The overall incidence of new onset hypopituitarism was 22.9%, with hypothyroidism serving as the most common individual axis deficiency. Univariate analysis indicated that only higher Ki-67 index (P=0.044) was significant favorable factors for endocrine remission.

Conclusion: IMRT was a highly effective second-line therapy with low side effect profile for CD patients. Endocrine remission, tumor control and recurrence rates were comparable to previous reports on FRT and SRS.

Introduction

Cushing’s disease (CD) is characterized by hypersecretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from pituitary adenoma. As the state of hypercortisolemia considerably increases morbidity and mortality, normalizing cortisol levels is regarded as the major treatment goal in patients with CD (1). Transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy (TSS) is now established as the first-line treatment of CD. Despite the satisfactory remission rate that can be achieved with TSS (ranging from 59-97%), delayed recurrences have also been reported in up to 50% of patients (2).

The Endocrine Society guidelines suggest a shared decision-making approach in patients who underwent a noncurative surgery or for whom surgery was not possible (3). Second-line therapeutic options include repeat transsphenoidal surgery, medical therapy, radiotherapy and bilateral adrenalectomy. Radiotherapy (RT) is generally used in patients who have failed TSS or have recurrent CD, as well as in progressively growing or invasive corticotroph tumors (3, 4).

Both stereotactic radiosurgery(SRS)and fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) have been used in the treatment of CD. Conventional radiotherapy as one of the technique for FRT has been used with a long experience, but its benefits were hindered by high risk of toxicity, mainly attributed to the harm to healthy surrounding structures (4). Previous studies on conventional RT in treating CD showed high efficacy (tumor control rate of 92-100% and hormonal control rate of 46-89%), but RT-induced hypopituitarism (30-58%) and recurrence (16-21%) were also commonly reported (1, 4–7). Modern precise radiotherapy, especially intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), can spare the surrounding normal structure better by a more conformal and precise dose distribution (8). However, a large cohort study on long-term efficacy and toxicity of IMRT for CD is still lacking. Therefore, in the current study, we aim to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in treating CD. We also investigated the predictors of endocrine remission in aid of further management.

Methods

Patient

We collected 115 cases of Cushing’s disease treated at our center from April 2012 to August 2021. Patients were excluded under the following conditions: (1) follow-up time less than 3 months, (2) lacking evaluation of serum cortisol (F), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) or 24-hour urinary free cortisol (24hUFC) before or after RT, (3) underwent uni or bilateral adrenalectomy, (4) having received RT at other institutes before admitted to our center. At last, a total of 70 cases were included in this study.

Radiotherapy parameters

RT was administrated by a linear accelerator (6 MV X-ray). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was applied for all patients. Including fix-filde IMRT (FF-IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or Tomotherapy. We immobilized the patient with an individualized thermoplastic head mask and then conducted a computed tomography (CT) simulation scan at 2- to 3-mm intervals. The target volume and organs at risks (OARs) were delined with a contrast enhanced T1-weighted image (T1WI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusing with planning CT. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined with the lesion visible on MRI or CT. The clinical target volume (CTV) included microscopic disease, especially when the tumor invaded cavernous sinus and surrounding bones. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as CTV plus a margin of 2- to 3-mm in three dimensions. The prescription dose was defined at 100% isodoseline to cover at least 95% PTV. The maximum dose was limited to less than 54 Gy for the brain stem and optic pathway structures. Radiotherapy was performed once a day and five fractions a week during five to six weeks. The total dose was 45-60 Gy, delivered in 25-30 fractions, with most patients (78.6%) receiving 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions. The fractionated dose was 1.8-2.0 Gy.

Data collection and clinical evaluation

Baseline characteristics were collected at the last outpatient visit before RT, including demographic characteristics, biochemical data, tumor characteristics and details of previous treatments. After RT, endocrine evaluations were performed every 6 months. Endocrine remission was considered when 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST)<1.8 mg/dl. If 1mg DST results were lacking, then 24hUFC within the normal range was used as a remission criterion. Patients who regained elevated hormone levels after achieving remission were considered to have endocrine recurrence. For patients receiving medications that could interfere with the metabolism of cortisol, hormonal evaluation was performed at least 3 months after the cessation of the therapy.

Tumor size was measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before RT and annually after the completion of RT. Any reduction in or stabilization of tumor size was considered as tumor control. Tumor recurrence was defined as an increase of 2 millimeters in 2 dimensions comparing to MRI before RT, or from invisible tumor to a visible tumor on MRI (9).

Anterior pituitary function was assessed before RT and every 6 months during the follow-up after RT. RT-induced hypopituitarism was defined as the development of new onset hormone deficiency after RT. The diagnostic criteria for growth hormone deficiency (GHD), central hypothyroidism and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) refer to previous literature (10–12). Panhypopituitarism referred to three or more anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies (13).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 25.0. Longitudinal analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method. For time-dependent variable, Log rank test was used for univariate analysis and Cox regression for multivariate analysis. The cut-off of F, ACTH and 24hUFC were defined as their median value. All variants in the univariate analysis were included in the model of multivariate analysis. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Plot was created with GraphPad Prism version 9.4.

Results

Patient characteristics

Of 70 cases included in the study, the median age was 32 years (range, 11-66 years). 60 (85.7%) were female and 10 (14.3%) were male (F:M= 6:1). The median follow-up time was 36.8 months (range, 3.0-111.0 months). 68 patients received RT as a second-line treatment because of incomplete tumor resection, failure to achieve complete endocrine remission or recurrence postoperative, and 2 were treated with RT alone because of contraindication of surgery. The frequency of surgical treatment was 1 for 42 patients, 2 for 21 and more than 3 for 5. A total of 8 patients received medical treatment before RT. 5 of them used pasireotide, 2 used ketoconazole and 1 used mifepristone. The median ACTH level was 58.7 pg/ml (range 14.9-265 pg/ml), F, 26.2μg/dl (range 11.8-72.6 μg/dl) and 24hUFC, 355.7 μg/24hr (range 53.5-3065 μg/24hr) before RT. Tumor size evaluation was performed in all 70 patients before RT. Among them, 36 patients showed no visible residual tumor identified on MRI and only 5 patients showed tumor size more than 1 cm. Hypopituitarism was found in 31 patients (38.8%) before RT. HH was the most common (21 patients, 26.3%), followed by central hypothyroidism (13 patients, 16.3%) and GHD (9 patients, 11.3%). Panhypopituitarism was found in 4 patients (5.0%). (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.orgTable 1 Patient characteristics.

Endocrine remission

Endocrine remission was achieved in 37 of 70 patients during the follow-up. Six of them were evaluated by 1mg DST. The hormonal remission rate at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years were 28.5%, 50.2%, 62.5% and 74.0%, respectively, gradually increasing with follow-up time (Figure 1). The median time to remission was 24.0 months (95%CI: 14.0-34.0 months). Univariate analysis indicated that only higher Ki-67 index (P=0.044) was significant favorable factors for endocrine remission. There was no significant correlation between remission and age, sex, tumor size, the frequency of surgery, medication prior RT. The hormone levels (F, ACTH and 24hUFC prior RT) were divided into high and low groups by the median value, and were also not found to be associated with endocrine remission (Table 2). Since only Ki-67 was significant in the univariate analysis and all other parameters were far from significant, a multivariate analysis was no longer performed.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.orgFigure 1 Endocrine remission rate during the follow-up after RT.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.orgTable 2 Univariate predictors of endocrine remission.

Endocrine recurrence was found in 5 patients till the last follow-up, with an overall recurrence rate of 13.5% (5/37). The median time to recurrence after reaching endocrine remission was 22.5 months. The recurrence-free rate at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after endocrine remission was 98.2%, 93.9%, 88.7% and 88.7%, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.orgFigure 2 Recurrence free rate after endocrine emission.

Tumor control

A total of 51 patients had repeated MRI examinations before and after treatment. During the follow-up, 20 patients showed reduction and 30 patoents remained stable in tumor size, with a tumor control rate of 98%. Only 1 patient showed enlargement tumor 1 year after RT, with F, ACTH and 24hUFC increase continuously.

Complications

At the last follow-up, 16 patients developed new onset hypopituitarism after RT. The overall incidence of RT-induced hypopituitarism was 22.9%. Hypothyroidism was the most common of hypopituitarism (8 patients), followed by HH (7 patients), adrenal insufficiency (4 patients) and GHD (3 patients). Only 1 patient (1.3%) with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) comorbidity complained of progressively worsening visual impairment during the follow up. No cerebrovascular event or radiation associated intracranial malignancy was found in our cohort.

Discussion

Efficacy and radiotherapy techniques

RT has been emerged as an effective second-line treatment for CD for many years. Although conventional fractionated RT has been used for a long experience in patients with CD, study on the modern precise radiotherapy, particularly IMRT, is rare and reports limited evidence on its long-term treatment outcome. IMRT can be implemented in many different techniques, such as fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FF-IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and tomotherapy. Compared with conventional RT, IMRT allows a better target volume conformity while preserves adequate coverage to the target (14, 15). Our study reported that IMRT for CD has an endocrine remission rate of 74.0% at 5 years, with a median time to remission of 24.0 months (95%CI: 14.0-34.0 months). The endocrine remission rate at 5 years was comparable to those reported in previous series of FRT, with a median time to remission within the reported range (4.5-44 months) (9, 16–18) (Table 3). Compared with SRS in treating CD, the endocrine remission rate and median time to remission were also similar. Pivonello et al (19) summarized 36 studies of SRS for CD between 1986 to 2014, the mean endocrine remission rate was 60.8% and the median time to remission was 24.5 months. Tumor control rate was 98% in our cohort, only one patient showed enlargement tumor with elevating hormones. This local control rate was also comparable to that reported in a series of pituitary adenoma treated with FRT (93-100%) and SRS(92-96%) (9, 16–18, 20, 21). Indeed, despite the lack of controlled studies about SRS and FRT in treating CD, many reviews that summarize the biochemical control and tumor contral of both are similar (2, 6, 19).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.orgTable 3 Literature review of FRT and SRS in patients with CD published in recent years.

The overall endocrine recurrence rate in our study was 13.5%, with a median time to recurrence of 22.5 months. We, for the first time, reported the actuarial recurrence free rate at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years in CD patients treated with IMRT. The recurrence free rate at 3 and 5 years was 88.7% in our study. Outcomes were comparable to those reported in patients treated with conventional RT or SRS, with a mean recurrence rate and a median recurrence time of 15.9% (range, 0-62.5%) and 28.1 months, or 12.3% (range, 0-100%) and 33.5 months, according to a review conducted by Pivonello et al (19).

At 2020, we reported the outcomes of pituitary somatotroph adenomas treated with IMRT at our institution (20). Compared with pituitary somatotroph adenomas, CD has a similar 5-year remission rate (74.0% vs 74.3%) but a shorter median time to remission (24.0m vs 36.2m) (Figure 3). The tumor contral rates were similar, at 98% and 99%, respectively. The endocrine recurrence rate was significantly different, with CD being about one-fold higher than the pituitary somatotroph adenoma (13.8% vs 6.1%). This may be due to the majority of microadenomas in CD and that of macroadenomas in pituitary somatotroph adenomas.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.orgFigure 3 Endocrine remission rate of CD and pituitary somatotroph adenoma.

Predictors of endocrine remission

In the univariate analysis, we found that only Ki-67 index ≥ 3% was correlated with better endocrine remission (p=0.044). Cortisol levels before RT and tumor size were not predictors of endocrine remission. For surgery in treating CD, higher preoperative ACTH level was considered as unfavorable prognostic factor for endocrine remission in a few studies (22, 23). For radiotherapy, some previous studies also have reported a faster endocrine remission in patients with lower serum cortisol level. Minniti et al. reported that hormone level was normalized faster in patients with lower urinary and plasma cortisol level at the time of RT (16). Apaydin also reported that low postoperative cortisol and 1mg DST was a favorable factors for faster remission in patients treated with gamma knife surgery (GKS) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), although no significant relationship was found between remission rate and plasma cortisol level prior RT in both studies (9, 16). Castinetti et al. found that initial 24hUFC was a predicative factor of endocrine remission in patients treated with GKS, which was not reported in our cohort treated with IMRT (24). However, the discrepancy between the results can be attributed to various factors, including selection bias of retrospective study, duration of follow-up, endocrine remission criteria and cut-off value.

Tumor size before RT was considered as a significant predictor for endocrine remission in some published series of patients treated with SRS. Jagannathan et al. reported a significant relationship between preoperative tumor volume and endocrine remission in patients with CD treated with GKS (25). However no significant correlation between tumor size and endocrine remission was found in series of patients treated with FRT (5, 9, 16, 17). But our study found no significant correlation between tumor size (visible or no-visible residual tumor on MRI) before RT and endocrine remission. The frequency of surgery before RT was also not found to be associated with endocrine remission in our study, which reached a similar conclusion with some previous studies (9, 17, 18, 26). Abu Dabrh et al. reported a higher remission rate in patients receiving TSS prior RT in their meta-analysis (5). Similar result was also reported in a review on the treatment outcome of GKS in patients with CD, that postoperative GKS was more effective than primary GK (19). However, analysis on this parameter was difficult in our cohort considering the low number of patients who received IMRT as the first-line treatment.

Reports on the effect of medical treatment on endocrine remission have been controversial. Some studies reported a negative effect of medical treatment at the time of SRS on endocrine remission in patients with CD. Castinetti et al. showed a significant higher rate of endocrine remission in patients who were not receiving ketoconazole at the time of GKS, compared to those who were (27). Sheehan et al. also found a significantly shorter time to remission in patients who discontinued ketoconazole at the time of GKS (28). However, no such correlation was found in patients treated with FRT (9, 17). Like previous studies on FRT, we also noted no significant relationship between preradiation use of medication and endocrine remission, but our statistical analysis may be hindered by the low proportion of patients undergoing medical treatment before RT. Moreover, the anticortisolic drugs used in previous studies were mainly ketoconazole or cabergoline, while most of our patient have received pasireotide, whose effect have not been well-studied yet. Further studies are necessary to understand the effect of somatostatin receptor ligands on the outcome of radiotherapy in patients with CD.

Complications

Hypopituitarism is the most common complication secondary to radiotherapy, with the rate of new-onset hypopituitarism ranging widely in previous report. Pivonello et al. reviewed series of CD patients who were treated with conventional RT with a follow-up of at least 5 years (19). The reported mean and median rates of hypopituitarism were 50% and 48.3%, respectively (range, 0-100%). As regards FRT, the overall rate of new-onset hypopituitarism was 22.2-40% at a median follow-up ranging from 29-108 months, with both incidence and severity increasing with longer follow-up (9, 16–19). The incidence of hypopituitarism in our series was 22.9%, which was within the reported range of new onset hypopituitarism after FRT. Lower rate of hypopituitarism after SRS compared to conventional RT has been recognized in previous reviews (2, 6). Our study showed that new onset hypopituitarism was less prevalent after IMRT than after conventional RT. This can be attributed to a higher precision in contouring the target volume and OARs, allowing these modern radiotherapy techniques to provide a better protection to hypothalamus-pituitary axes. In previous studies, potential risk factors for new onset hypopituitarism included suprasellar extension, higher radiation dose to the tumor margin and lower isodose line prescribed (29, 30). Sensitivity of individual hormonal axes to RT varies in different series. In our study, central hypothyroidism was the most common individual axis deficiency, followed by HH, adrenal insufficiency and GHD. This sequence was similar to that reported by Sheehan et al., whose series included 64 CD patients treated with SRS, as well as some other series (29, 31). It is noted in some studies that GHD is the most vulnerable axes (19, 32, 33). Limited number of patients undergoing stimulation test may underestimate the prevalence of GHD in our study and some previous series, and longer follow-up is needed to generate a more accurate, time-dependent rate of new onset hypopituitarism.

In our study, only one patient complained of mild visual impairment, which was comparable to the rate ranging from 0-4.5% in previous series of FRT treating pituitary adenoma (9, 16–18, 26, 32, 34, 35). This patient had concomitant SLE and the associated microangiopathy may render the optic nerve intolerant to radiotherapy. Cranial nerve damage was acknowledged as an uncommon complication, with an estimated risk of vision deterioration below 1% if single radiation dose was no more than 2.0 Gy and total dose no more than 45-50 Gy (2, 36). The actuarial rate of optic neuropathy at 10 years was 0.8% in a series containing 385 patients with pituitary adenoma (37). No patient in our cohort developed cerebrovascular accident or secondary brain tumor. This finding was consistent with the low actuarial prevalence of these complications reported in other published series of FRT. Secondary brain tumor was extremely rare after SRS, with an overall incidence of 6.80 per patients-year, or a cumulative incidence of 0.00045% over 10 years in a multicenter cohort study containing 4905 patients treated with GKS (38). Ecemis et al. reviewed cohort studies of conventional RT in treating pituitary adenoma from 1990 to 2013 and found that 1.42% of patients developed secondary brain tumor, with a latency period of 19.6 years for meningioma, 11 years for glioma and 9 years for astrocytoma (39). As for cerebrovascular accident, Minniti et al. reported two patients (in a total of 40 patients) who had stroke 6 and 8 years after FRT (16). Data was still limited for FRT. Considering the low incidence and long latency period, large, controlled cohort study with long follow-up of FRT is still needed to accurately evaluate these complications.

Limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, not all patients rigorously followed regular follow-up time points, making time-dependent statistical analysis less accurate. In addition, the excessively low number of cases with 1mg DST as the endocrine remission criterion may affect the accuracy of the remission rate.Moreover, a median follow-up time of about 3 years hampered evaluation on some late complications, including cerebrovascular events and secondary brain tumor.

In conclusion, our study revealed that IMRT was a highly effective second-line therapy with low side effect profile for CD patients, and it’s endocrine remission, tumor control and recurrence rates were comparable to previous reports on FRT and SRS.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

1. Conceptualization: FZ and HZ 2. Data curation: XL and ZX. 3. Funding acquisition: FZ. 4. Investigation: XL and ZX 5. Methodology: WW 6. Resources: XL, SS and XH 7. Validation: LL and HZ. 8. Writing – original draft: ZX 9. Writing – review and editing: XL. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

Supported by grants National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (No.2022-PUMCH-B-052) and National Key R&D Program of China, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China.(Grant No. 2022YFC2407100, 2022YFC2407101).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Katznelson L. Role of radiation in the treatment of Cushing disease. Pituitary (2022) 25(5):740–2. doi: 10.1007/s11102-022-01234-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ironside N, Chen CJ, Lee CC, Trifiletti DM, Vance ML, Sheehan JP. Outcomes of pituitary radiation for Cushing’s disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am (2018) 47(2):349–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2018.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Murad MH, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, et al. Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2015) 100(8):2807–31. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1818

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Gheorghiu ML, Fleseriu M. Stereotactic radiation therapy in pituitary adenomas, is it better than conventional radiation therapy? Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) (2017) 13(4):476–90. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2017.476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Abu Dabrh AM, Singh Ospina NM, Al Nofal A, Farah WH, Barrionuevo P, Sarigianni M, et al. Predictors of biochemical remission and recurrence after surgical and radiation treatments of cushing disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Pract (2016) 22(4):466–75. doi: 10.4158/EP15922.RA

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Gheorghiu ML. Updates in the outcomes of radiation therapy for Cushing’s disease. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab (2021) 35(2):101514. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2021.101514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Minniti G, Brada M. Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for Cushing’s disease. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol (2007) 51(8):1373–80. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302007000800024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Castinetti F, Brue T, Ragnarsson O. Radiotherapy as a tool for the treatment of Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol/European Fed Endocr Societies (2019) 180(5):D9–D18. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0092

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Apaydin T, Ozkaya HM, Durmaz SM, Meral R, Kadioglu P. Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiotherapy in Cushing’s disease: A single center experience. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes (2021) 129(7):482–91. doi: 10.1055/a-1217-7365

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Fleseriu M, Hashim IA, Karavitaki N, Melmed S, Murad MH, Salvatori R, et al. Hormonal replacement in hypopituitarism in adults: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2016) 101(11):3888–921. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Higham CE, Johannsson G, Shalet SM. Hypopituitarism. Lancet (2016) 388(10058):2403–15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30053-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, Matsumoto AM, Snyder PJ, Swerdloff RS, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with androgen deficiency syndromes: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2010) 95(6):2536–59. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Jazbinsek S, Kolenc D, Bosnjak R, Faganel Kotnik B, Zaletel Zadravec L, et al. Prevalence of endocrine and metabolic comorbidities in a national cohort of patients with craniopharyngioma. Horm Res Paediatr (2020) 93(1):46–57. doi: 10.1159/000507702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ramos-Prudencio R, Perez-Alvarez SI, Flores-Balcazar CH, de Leon-Alfaro MA, Herrera-Gonzalez JA, Elizalde-Cabrera J, et al. Radiotherapy for the treatment of pituitary adenomas: A dosimetric comparison of three planning techniques. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother (2020) 25(4):586–93. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bortfeld T. IMRT: a review and preview. Phys Med Biol (2006) 51(13):R363–79. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Minniti G, Osti M, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Esposito V, Cantore G, Maurizi Enrici R. Long-term follow-up results of postoperative radiation therapy for Cushing’s disease. J Neurooncol (2007) 84(1):79–84. doi: 10.1007/s11060-007-9344-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Budyal S, Lila AR, Jalali R, Gupta T, Kasliwal R, Jagtap VS, et al. Encouraging efficacy of modern conformal fractionated radiotherapy in patients with uncured Cushing’s disease. Pituitary (2014) 17(1):60–7. doi: 10.1007/s11102-013-0466-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Sherry AD, Khattab MH, Xu MC, Kelly P, Anderson JL, Luo G, et al. Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for refractory Cushing’s disease. Pituitary (2019) 22(6):607–13. doi: 10.1007/s11102-019-00992-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pivonello R, De Leo M, Cozzolino A, Colao A. The treatment of Cushing’s disease. Endocr Rev (2015) 36(4):385–486. doi: 10.1210/er.2013-1048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Lian X, Shen J, Gu Z, Yan J, Sun S, Hou X, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for pituitary somatotroph adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2020) 105(12):4712–e4721. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa651

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mackley HB, Reddy CA, Lee SY, Harnisch GA, Mayberg MR, Hamrahian AH, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas: the preliminary report of the Cleveland Clinic experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2007) 67(1):232–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Dai C, Fan Y, Liu X, Bao X, Yao Y, Wang R, et al. Predictors of immediate remission after surgery in Cushing’s disease patients: A large retrospective study from a single center. Neuroendocrinol (2021) 111(11):1141–50. doi: 10.1159/000509221

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Cannavo S, Almoto B, Dall’Asta C, Corsello S, Lovicu RM, De Menis E, et al. Long-term results of treatment in patients with ACTH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas. Eur J Endocrinol/European Fed Endocr Societies (2003) 149(3):195–200. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1490195

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Castinetti F, Nagai M, Morange I, Dufour H, Caron P, Chanson P, et al. Long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery in secretory pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2009) 94(9):3400–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2772

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Jagannathan J, Sheehan JP, Pouratian N, Laws ER, Steiner L, Vance ML. Gamma Knife surgery for Cushing’s disease. J Neurosurg (2007) 106(6):980–7. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.980

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Colin P, Jovenin N, Delemer B, Caron J, Grulet H, Hecart AC, et al. Treatment of pituitary adenomas by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: a prospective study of 110 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2005) 62(2):333–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Castinetti F, Nagai M, Dufour H, Kuhn JM, Morange I, Jaquet P, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery is a successful adjunctive treatment in Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol/European Fed Endocr Societies (2007) 156(1):91–8. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02323

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Sheehan JP, Xu Z, Salvetti DJ, Schmitt PJ, Vance ML. Results of gamma knife surgery for Cushing’s disease. J Neurosurg (2013) 119(6):1486–92. doi: 10.3171/2013.7.JNS13217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Xu Z, Lee Vance M, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP. Hypopituitarism after stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery (2013) 72(4):630–7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182846e44

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Cordeiro D, Xu Z, Mehta GU, Ding D, Vance ML, Kano H, et al. Hypopituitarism after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: a multicenter, international study. J Neurosurg (2018), 1188–96. doi: 10.3171/2018.5.Jns18509

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Scheick S, Amdur RJ, Kirwan JM, Morris CG, Mendenhall WM, Roper S, et al. Long-term outcome after fractionated radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma: the curse of the secretory tumor. Am J Clin Oncol (2016) 39(1):49–54. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Minniti G, Traish D, Ashley S, Gonsalves A, Brada M. Fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for secreting and nonsecreting pituitary adenomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2006) 64(5):542–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02506.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Degerblad M, Brismar K, Rahn T, Thoren M. The hypothalamus-pituitary function after pituitary stereotactic radiosurgery: evaluation of growth hormone deficiency. J Intern Med (2003) 253(4):454–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01125.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Plitt AR, El Ahmadieh TY, Aoun SG, Wardak Z, Barnett SL. Fractionated cyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy for perioptic pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg (2019) 126:e1359–64. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kong DS, Lee JI, Lim DH, Kim KW, Shin HJ, Nam DH, et al. The efficacy of fractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: long-term results of 125 consecutive patients treated in a single institution. Cancer (2007) 110(4):854–60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22860

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Becker G, Kocher M, Kortmann RD, Paulsen F, Jeremic B, Muller RP, et al. Radiation therapy in the multimodal treatment approach of pituitary adenoma. Strahlenther Onkol (2002) 178(4):173–86. doi: 10.1007/s00066-002-0826-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Erridge SC, Conkey DS, Stockton D, Strachan MW, Statham PF, Whittle IR, et al. Radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas: long-term efficacy and toxicity. Radiother Oncol (2009) 93(3):597–601. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Wolf A, Naylor K, Tam M, Habibi A, Novotny J, Liscak R, et al. Risk of radiation-associated intracranial Malignancy after stereotactic radiosurgery: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol (2019) 20(1):159–64. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30659-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Ecemis GC, Atmaca A, Meydan D. Radiation-associated secondary brain tumors after conventional radiotherapy and radiosurgery. Expert Rev Neurother (2013) 13(5):557–65. doi: 10.1586/ern.13.37

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cushing’s disease, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, radiotherapy, pituitary adenoma, ACTH

Citation: Lian X, Xu Z, Sun S, Wang W, Zhu H, Lu L, Hou X and Zhang F (2023) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cushing’s disease: single-center experience in 70 patients. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1241669. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1241669

Received: 17 June 2023; Accepted: 31 August 2023;
Published: 26 September 2023.

Edited by:

Luiz Augusto Casulari, University of Brasilia, Brazil

Reviewed by:

Luiz Eduardo Armondi Wildemberg, Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer (IECPN), Brazil
Carolina Leães Rech, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Brazil

Copyright © 2023 Lian, Xu, Sun, Wang, Zhu, Lu, Hou and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fuquan Zhang, zhangfq@pumch.cn

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

From https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1241669/full

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Pituitary Surgery Outcome in Patients 75 Years and Older

Posted on October 5, 2023 by MaryO

Abstract

Background

As the population ages, the number of elderly patients with an indication for pituitary surgery is rising. Information on the outcome of patients aged over 75 is limited. This study reports a large series assessing the feasibility of surgical resection in this specific age range, focusing on surgical complications and postoperative results.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients with pituitary adenomas and Rathke’s cleft cysts was conducted. All patients were aged 75 years or over and treated by a single expert neurosurgical team. A control population included 2379 younger adult patients operated by the same surgeons during the same period.

Results

Between 2008 and 2022, 155 patients underwent surgery. Indication was based on vision impairment in most patients (79%). Median follow-up was 13 months (range: 3–96). The first surgery was performed with an endoscopic transsellar approach, an extended endonasal transtuberculum approach and a microscopic transcranial approach in 96%, 3%, and 1% of patients, respectively. Single surgery was sufficient to obtain volume control in 97% of patients. From Kaplan-Meier estimates, 2-year and 5-year disease control with a single surgery were 97.3% and 86.2%, respectively. Resection higher than 80% was achieved in 77% of patients. No vision worsening occurred. In acromegaly and Cushing’s disease, endocrine remission was obtained in 90% of non-invasive adenomas. Surgical complications were noted in 5% of patients, with 30-day mortality, hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, and epistaxis occurring in 0.6%, 0.6%, 1.9%, 0.6%, and 1.3% respectively. New endocrine anterior deficits occurred in only 5%, while no persistent diabetes insipidus was noted. Compared with younger patients, the complication rate was not statistically different.

Conclusions

Surgery beyond the age of 75, mainly relying on an endoscopic endonasal transsellar approach, is effective and safe, provided that patients are managed in tertiary centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Abbreviations

CSF:
Cerebrospinal fluid
ASA:
American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System

References

  1. Albano L, Losa M, Barzaghi LR, Niranjan A, Siddiqui Z, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Mortini P (2021) Gamma Knife radiosurgery for pituitary tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 13(19):4998

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander TD, Chitguppi C, Collopy S et al (2022) Surgical outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection in elderly versus younger patients. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 83(4):405–410

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  3. Baussart B, Declerck A, Gaillard S (2021) Mononostril endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163(3):655–659

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Baussart B, Racy E, Gaillard S (2022) Double pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base repair after endoscopic expanded endonasal approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 164(4):1111–1114

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Baussart B, Venier A, Jouinot A, Reuter G, Gaillard S (2022) Closure strategy for endoscopic pituitary surgery: experience from 3015 patients. Front Oncol 12:1067312

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Biamonte E, Betella N, Milani D, Lasio GB, Ariano S, Radice S, Lavezzi E, Mazziotti G, Lania A (2021) Impact of age on postsurgical outcomes of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Endocrine 72(3):915–922

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Castinetti F, Nagai M, Dufour H, Kuhn J-M, Morange I, Jaquet P, Conte-Devolx B, Regis J, Brue T (2007) Gamma Knife radiosurgery is a successful adjunctive treatment in Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol 156(1):91–98

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chalif EJ, Couldwell WT, Aghi MK (2022) Effect of facility volume on giant pituitary adenoma neurosurgical outcomes. J Neurosurg 14:1–10

    Google Scholar

  9. Chen SH, Sprau A, Chieng L, Buttrick S, Alam ES, Ali SC, Madhavan K, Sargi ZB, Komotar R (2019) Transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas in elderly patients. World Neurosurg 121:e670–e674

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ciric I, Ragin A, Baumgartner C, Pierce D (1997) Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. Neurosurgery 40(2):225–236 (discussion 236-237)

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Cossu G, Jouanneau E, Cavallo LM et al (2022) Surgical management of giant pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: meta-analysis and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section. Brain Spine 2:100878

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  12. Ding D, Mehta GU, Patibandla MR et al (2019) Stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: an international multicenter retrospective cohort study. Neurosurg 84(3):717–725

    Article Google Scholar

  13. Eichberg DG, Di L, Shah AH, Luther E, Richardson AM, Sarkiss CA, Ivan ME, Komotar RJ (2019) Brain tumor surgery is safe in octogenarians and nonagenarians: a single-surgeon 741 patient series. World Neurosurg 132:e185–e192

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Engel JS, Tran J, Khalil N, Hladkowicz E, Lalu MM, Huang A, Wong CL, Hutton B, Dhesi JK, McIsaac DI (2023) A systematic review of perioperative clinical practice guidelines for care of older adults living with frailty. Br J Anaesth 130(3):262–271

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, Barr CE, Dodge WE, Vance ML, McCutcheon IE (2004) The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer 101(3):613–619

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Falk Erhag H, Guðnadóttir G, Alfredsson J, Cederholm T, Ekerstad N, Religa D, Nellgård B, Wilhelmson K (2023) The association between the clinical frailty scale and adverse health outcomes in older adults in acute clinical settings – a systematic review of the literature. Clin Interv Aging 18:249–261

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  17. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I et al (2021) Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(12):847–875

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  18. Frara S, Rodriguez-Carnero G, Formenti AM, Martinez-Olmos MA, Giustina A, Casanueva FF (2020) Pituitary tumors centers of excellence. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 49(3):553–564

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Gaillard S (2014) The transition from microscopic to endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery in high-caseload neurosurgical centers: the experience of Foch Hospital. World Neurosurg 82(6 Suppl):S116-120

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Giustina A, Chanson P, Bronstein MD et al (2010) A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(7):3141–3148

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Gondim JA, Almeida JP, de Albuquerque LAF, Gomes E, Schops M, Mota JI (2015) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery in elderly patients with pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 123(1):31–38

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Horvath B, Kloesel B, Todd MM, Cole DJ, Prielipp RC (2021) The evolution, current value, and future of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. Anesthesiology 135(5):904–919

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Kinoshita Y, Taguchi A, Tominaga A, Arita K, Yamasaki F (2021) Pseudocapsular resection in elderly patients with non-functioning pituitary adenoma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 210:106997

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993) Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33(4):610–617 (discussion 617-618)

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Lee C-C, Sheehan JP (2016) Advances in Gamma Knife radiosurgery for pituitary tumors. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 23(4):331–338

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Leiner T, Nemeth D, Hegyi P, Ocskay K, Virag M, Kiss S, Rottler M, Vajda M, Varadi A, Molnar Z (2022) Frailty and emergency surgery: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 9:811524

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Lin H-S, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE (2016) Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 16(1):157

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  28. Lu VM, Ravindran K, Perry A, Graffeo CS, Dawood HY, Van Gompel JJ, Mekary RA, Smith TR (2020) Recurrence of Rathke’s cleft cysts based on gross total resection of cyst wall: a meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 43(3):957–966

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Maiuri F, Corvino S, Lorenzetti M, Franca RA, Esposito F, Caro Del Basso De M (2023) Intracranial meningiomas in patients aged ≥80 years: pathological features and surgical problems. World Neurosurg 173:e498–e508

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Marcus HJ, Khan DZ, Borg A et al (2021) Pituitary society expert Delphi consensus: operative workflow in endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection. Pituitary 24(6):839–853

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  31. Melmed S (ed) (2017) The pituitary, 4th edn. Elsevier/Academic Press, London, United Kingdom, San Diego

    Google Scholar

  32. Melmed S, Kaiser UB, Lopes MB et al (2022) Clinical biology of the pituitary adenoma. Endocr Rev 43(6):1003–1037

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  33. Memel Z, Chesney K, Pangal DJ, Bonney PA, Carmichael JD, Zada G (2019) Outcomes following transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in the elderly: a retrospective single-center review. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 16(3):302–309

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Messerer M, De Battista JC, Raverot G, Kassis S, Dubourg J, Lapras V, Trouillas J, Perrin G, Jouanneau E (2011) Evidence of improved surgical outcome following endoscopy for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma removal. Neurosurg Focus 30(4):E11

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Micko A, Oberndorfer J, Weninger WJ, Vila G, Höftberger R, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E (2019) Challenging Knosp high-grade pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 132(6):1739–1746

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  36. Minniti G, Esposito V, Piccirilli M, Fratticci A, Santoro A, Jaffrain-Rea M-L (2005) Diagnosis and management of pituitary tumours in the elderly: a review based on personal experience and evidence of literature. Eur J Endocrinol 153(6):723–735

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  37. Minniti G, Filippi AR, Osti MF, Ricardi U (2017) Radiation therapy for older patients with brain tumors. Radiat Oncol 12(1):101

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  38. Minniti G, Scaringi C, Poggi M, Jaffrain Rea ML, Trillò G, Esposito V, Bozzao A, Enrici MM, Toscano V, Enrici RM (2015) Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large and invasive non-functioning pituitary adenomas: long-term clinical outcomes and volumetric MRI assessment of tumor response. Eur J Endocrinol 172(4):433–441

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  39. Mortini P, Nocera G, Roncelli F, Losa M, Formenti AM, Giustina A (2020) The optimal numerosity of the referral population of pituitary tumors centers of excellence (PTCOE): a surgical perspective. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 21(4):527–536

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  40. Nidadavolu LS, Ehrlich AL, Sieber FE, Oh ES (2020) Preoperative evaluation of the frail patient. Anesth Analg 130(6):1493–1503

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  41. Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H, Patil N, Waite K, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2019) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016. Neuro Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v1–v100

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  42. Pereira MP, Oh T, Joshi RS et al (2020) Clinical characteristics and outcomes in elderly patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. Neurosurg Focus 49(4):E19

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  43. Quah BL, Edwards-Bailey A, Gnanalingham K, Pathmanaban O, Vasilopoulos H, Roncaroli F, Kearney T, Balogun J, Karabatsou K (2022) Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for biochemically and clinically non-functioning adenohypophyseal tumours in the elderly: experience from a single UK centre. Endocrine 75(3):872–882

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  44. Robenshtok E, Benbassat CA, Hirsch D, Tzvetov G, Cohen ZR, Iraqi HM, Gorshtein A, Toledano Y, Shimon I (2014) Clinical course and outcome of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas in the elderly compared with younger age groups. Endocr Pract 20(2):159–164

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  45. Saleh A, Thirukumaran C, Mesfin A, Molinari RW (2017) Complications and readmission after lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients: an analysis of 2,320 patients. Spine J 17(8):1106–1112

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  46. Sheehan JM, Douds GL, Hill K, Farace E (2008) Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma in elderly patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150(6):571–574 (discussion 574)

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  47. Sheehan JP, Starke RM, Mathieu D et al (2013) Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the management of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a multicenter study: clinical article. JNS 119(2):446–456

    Article Google Scholar

  48. Sherlock M, Ayuk J, Tomlinson JW, Toogood AA, Aragon-Alonso A, Sheppard MC, Bates AS, Stewart PM (2010) Mortality in patients with pituitary disease. Endocr Rev 31(3):301–342

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  49. Spina A, Losa M, Mortini P (2019) Pituitary adenomas in elderly patients: clinical and surgical outcome analysis in a large series. Endocrine 65(3):637–645

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  50. Tardivo V, Penner F, Garbossa D, Di Perna G, Pacca P, Salvati L, Altieri R, Grottoli S, Zenga F (2020) Surgical management of pituitary adenomas: does age matter? Pituitary 23(2):92–102

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  51. Thakur JD, Corlin A, Mallari RJ et al (2021) Pituitary adenomas in older adults (≥ 65 years): 90-day outcomes and readmissions: a 10-year endoscopic endonasal surgical experience. Pituitary 24(1):14–26

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  52. Trouillas J, Jaffrain-Rea M-L, Vasiljevic A, Raverot G, Roncaroli F, Villa C (2020) How to classify the pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET)s in 2020. Cancers (Basel) 12(2):E514

    Article Google Scholar

  53. Tuleasca C, Ducos Y, Leroy H-A, Chanson P, Knafo S, Levivier M, Aghakhani N, Parker F (2020) Transsphenoidal resection for pituitary adenoma in elderly versus younger patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(6):1297–1308

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  54. Villa C, Vasiljevic A, Jaffrain-Rea ML et al (2019) A standardised diagnostic approach to pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs): a European Pituitary Pathology Group (EPPG) proposal. Virchows Arch 475(6):687–692

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  55. Wilson PJ, Omay SB, Kacker A, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2018) Endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery in the elderly. J Neurosurg 128(2):429–436

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  56. Yunoue S, Tokimura H, Tominaga A et al (2014) Transsphenoidal surgical treatment of pituitary adenomas in patients aged 80 years or older. Neurosurg Rev 37(2):269–276 (discussion 276-277)

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  57. Zhan R, Ma Z, Wang D, Li X (2015) Pure endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas in the elderly: surgical outcomes and complications in 158 patients. World Neurosurg 84(6):1572–1578

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  58. Zietlow KE, Wong S, Heflin MT, McDonald SR, Sickeler R, Devinney M, Blitz J, Lagoo-Deenadayalan S, Berger M (2022) Geriatric preoperative optimization: a review. Am J Med 135(1):39–48

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France

    Marta Garvayo, Vincent Reina, Stephan Gaillard & Bertrand Baussart

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Marta Garvayo & Mahmoud Messerer

  3. Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Cochin, 75014, Paris, France

    Chiara Villa, Anne Jouinot, Jérôme Bertherat, Guillaume Assié & Bertrand Baussart

  4. Department of Neuropathology, La Pitié-Salpêtière University Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France

    Chiara Villa

  5. Department of Endocrinology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne Billancourt, France

    Mirella Hage & Marie-Laure Raffin-Sanson

  6. Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines UFR Des Sciences de La Santé Simone Veil, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France

    Mirella Hage & Marie-Laure Raffin-Sanson

  7. Department of Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Centre de Référence Des Maladies Endocriniennes Rares de La Croissance Et du Développement, CRMERC, Endo-ERN, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France

    Carine Courtillot & Anne Bachelot

  8. Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie Et Physiopathologie Endocriniennes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service d’Endocrinologie Et Des Maladies de La Reproduction, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de L’Hypophyse, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

    Peter Kamenicky & Philippe Chanson

  9. Sorbonne University, Endocrine Unit, Reproductive Medicine, Centre de Référence Des Maladies Endocriniennes Rares de La Croissance Et du Développement (CRMERC), Endo-ERN (Id 739527), Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Camille Vatier & Sophie Christin-Maitre

  10. Inserm UMRS938, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Sorbonne University, 75012, Paris, France

    Camille Vatier

  11. INSERM UMR-833, Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France

    Sophie Christin-Maitre

  12. Department of Endocrinology, Center of Rare Adrenal Diseases, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

    Jérôme Bertherat & Guillaume Assié

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bertrand Baussart.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

From https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-023-05809-x

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Treatments | Tagged: , , | Leave a comment »

Cushing’s Syndrome in Pregnancy in Which Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy was Safely Performed by a Retroperitoneal Approach

Posted on October 2, 2023 by MaryO

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the standard treatment for adrenal tumors caused by Cushing’s syndrome. However, few pregnant women have undergone adrenalectomy because of the risk of general anesthesia and surgery.

Case presentation

A 28-year-old woman presented with gradually worsening Cushing’s signs at around 12 weeks of pregnancy. Magnetic resonance imaging displayed a 38-mm left adrenal tumor, which was the cause of the adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. Metyrapone was started, which increased androgen levels. Since the management of Cushing’s syndrome by medication alone is challenging, unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy by a retroperitoneal approach was performed at 23 weeks of the pregnancy. No perioperative complications were noted.

Conclusion

Adrenalectomy is considered safe in pregnant women with Cushing’s syndrome. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy by retroperitoneal approach should be chosen and performed between 14 and 30 weeks of pregnancy to prevent mother and fetal complications.

Abbreviations & Acronyms

  • CS
  • Cushing’s syndrome
  • MRI
  • magnetic resonance imaging

Keynote message

We report a rare case of adrenalectomy performed via a retroperitoneal approach for Cushing’s syndrome in a pregnant woman. Cushing’s syndrome may affect the fetus, and surgery can be considered in addition to medical management. Adrenalectomy should be performed in the second trimester of pregnancy. Pneumoperitoneal pressure, position, and surgical approaches must receive careful attention.

Introduction

CS is characterized by excessive cortisol secretion and characteristic symptoms such as full moon-like facial features and central obesity. Premenopausal women with CS rarely become pregnant because excessive glucocorticoid secretion inhibits the synthesis of gonadotropins, leading to impaired ovarian and endometrial function, and causing amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea.1 Furthermore, even when women with CS become pregnant, the incidence of severe complications is high. CS can cause maternal hypertension, diabetes/glucose intolerance, osteopenia/osteoporosis, preeclampsia, pulmonary edema, heart failure, opportunistic infections, and even death. Additionally, CS can potentially cause stillbirth, prematurity, and intrauterine fetal growth restriction.1–6 Therefore, CS must be detected at an early stage in pregnancy; however, CS may go undetected because of the overlapping signs of preeclampsia and/or gestational diabetes.

A cortisol-secreting adrenal tumor is the underlying cause of CS, and laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the standard treatment to it. Medical treatment of CS can include medications that inhibit 11β-hydroxylase, such as metyrapone and osilodrostat, but surgical treatment is considered if the disease is difficult to control with medical treatment. Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy is performed in 1%–2% of pregnant women.7 Although general anesthesia is relatively safe during pregnancy, the indication for the surgery must be carefully considered because of potential risks such as neurodevelopmental delay, sudden death, etc.

Herein, we present a case of a pregnant woman diagnosed with CS who underwent unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy by a retroperitoneal approach without any problems.

Case presentation

The patient was a 28-year-old primiparous woman. Since around 12 weeks of pregnancy, she has experienced facial and lower limb edema; gained 6-kg weight in 1 month; increased facial acne; and experienced subcutaneous bleeding on the forearms, red abdominal dermatitis, proximal muscle weakness, palpitations, insomnia, and decreased vision in eyes. Her symptoms gradually worsened from 14 weeks, and she was referred to our hospital to clarify the cause at 18 weeks of pregnancy.

Adrenal CS was suspected on the basis of her Cushing’s signs, cortisol 25 μg/dL, and adrenocorticotropic hormone <1.5 pg/mL. She had hypokalemia, hypogammaglobulinemia, and liver dysfunction, and her condition was rapidly worsening. Given her pregnant state, she was admitted for intensive testing for the case of CS from 19 weeks of pregnancy. MRI revealed a well-defined 38-mm left adrenal tumor, which was the cause of the adrenal CS (Fig. 1). She was started on metyrapone with 250 mg per day, which increased androgens (0.53–0.69 ng/mL in 1 week). We considered that the management of CS by medication alone would be challenging and performed adrenalectomy during her pregnancy. The dose of metyrapone was increased to 1000 mg per day eventually.

Details are in the caption following the image

Magnetic resonance imaging on admission shows a left adrenal tumor with a long axis of 38 mm (arrowhead). Signal reduction was partially observed on opposed-phase images, leading to diagnosis of cortical adenoma.

She was admitted to the hospital at 23 weeks and 2 days of gestation, and laparoscopic left adrenalectomy was performed via a retroperitoneal approach in the right lateral and jackknife position on the following day (Fig. S1). During the surgery, blood pressure was carefully controlled by an anesthesiologist and the patient’s position and fetal heart rate were monitored by an obstetrician. The operation time, insufflation time, and general anesthesia time were 68, 59, and 123 min, respectively, and the blood loss volume was 75 mL, without any complications. Pathological findings revealed an adrenocortical adenoma. The specimen was positive for one of the nine Weiss criteria (Fig. 2).

Details are in the caption following the image

(a) Intraoperative findings of the retroperitoneal approach. Arrowheads indicate the tumor. (b) Gross appearance of the resected adrenal tumor; a brownish-toned, substantial mass, 60 × 34 × 15 mm in size. (c, d) Hematoxylin–eosin staining showed that nodular lesion with a fibrous capsule, with foci of homogeneous cells with eosinophilic or pale, foamy sporangia and small round nuclei.

Postoperatively, metyrapone was discontinued and both lower leg edema, facial acne, fatigue, and muscle weakness improved. Metyrapone was discontinued after surgery. Hydrocortisone, which had been administered at 150 mg/day during the perioperative period, was reduced every few weeks and was taken at 30 mg/day at delivery. She delivered by cesarean section at 38 weeks and 2 days of gestation, with good outcomes for the mother and her infant. Hydrocortisone was discontinued 15 weeks after delivery.

We showed the changes in cortisol and ACTH from the first visit to postpartum (Fig. 3).

Details are in the caption following the image

The transition of Cortisol and ACTH. Cortisol decreases rapidly after surgery and rises again before delivery. As cortisol improved, ACTH also increased.

Discussion

CS seldom occurs during pregnancy. Symptoms such as weight gain, skin striae, fatigue, and a round face can also occur in normal pregnancies. The dexamethasone suppression test can result in false positives because of ACTH produced by placenta in normal pregnancy. During pregnancy, there is a physiological state of high cortisol levels. The disappearance of diurnal rhythm is a useful indicator for diagnosis of CS in pregnancy because circadian rhythm is maintained in normal pregnancy. Useful diagnostic criteria include urine cortisol levels greater than three times the upper limit of normal, loss of diurnal cortisol rhythm, and presence of adrenal tumors on MRI.

The pharmacologic treatment of endogenous cortisol is complex, and hormonal management is challenging. While the management of the cortisol levels is important, metyrapone is a risk factor for gestational hypertension and may inhibit fetal cortisol production by crossing the placenta.1–6, 8–12

In this case, because androgens were also elevated and drug management was expected to be challenging, the surgery was aggressively considered. Despite the reports of successful adrenalectomy is after 28 weeks of gestation,6, 13, 14 The surgery should be performed by an experienced team between 14 and 30 weeks of pregnancy, that is, after organogenesis phase and before the fetus grows too large.1, 13, 15

A few pregnant women with adrenal CS undergo adrenalectomy. However, the laparoscopic approach is safe, and maternal and fetal complications were higher in women who did not undergo surgery.16 Less postoperative pain, faster wound healing, and faster postoperative recovery are the main advantages of laparoscopic surgery.17

In pregnant women, pneumoperitoneal pressure should be kept <12 mmHg because increased intraabdominal pressure decreases placental blood flow and can cause fetal acidosis due to the absorption of carbon dioxide used for insufflation.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be safely performed through both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.18 However, in pregnant women, performing the surgery by the retroperitoneal approach in the lateral position is preferable to prevent putting pressure on the fetus during the surgery. The retroperitoneal approach is advantageous, as less pressure is placed on the uterus and adhesions are prevented. After taking the lateral position, the obstetrician is advised to check the position and confirm that the abdomen is not compressed and that the fetal heart rate is normal.

Conclusions

We present a case of a pregnant woman diagnosed with adrenal CS who underwent a unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy by a retroperitoneal approach without any problems. Adrenalectomy is a useful treatment when CS is difficult to control despite metyrapone and other medical support.

Author contributions

Nobuyoshi Takeuchi: Conceptualization; methodology; project administration; writing – original draft. Yusuke Imamura: Conceptualization; methodology; supervision; writing – review and editing. Kazuki Ishiwata: Data curation; supervision. Manato Kanesaka: Data curation; supervision. Yusuke Goto: Data curation; supervision. Tomokazu Sazuka: Data curation; supervision. Sawako Suzuki: Data curation; supervision. Hisashi Koide: Data curation; supervision. Shinichi Sakamoto: Data curation; supervision. Tomohiko Ichikawa: Data curation; supervision.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Informed consent for the release of the case report and accompanying images has been obtained from the patient.

Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial

Not applicable.

From https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iju5.12637

Filed under: adrenal, Cushing's, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Birthday of the Message Boards

Posted on September 30, 2023 by MaryO
September 30, 2000 - Birth of the Message Boards

September 30, 2000 – Birth of the Message Boards

Today  is the birthday, or anniversary, of the boards starting September 30, 2000 (The rest of the site started earlier that year in July)

As of today, we have 73,357 members who have made well over 380,324 posts.

Find the message boards here: http://cushings.invisionzone.com/

Filed under: adrenal, adrenal crisis, Cancer, Clinical trials, Cushing's, Diagnostic Testing, FAQ, growth hormone, Helpful Doctors, Interview, Meetings and Conferences, pituitary, podcast, Rare Diseases, Thankfulness, Treatments | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

Etomidate in the Treatment Of Cushing Syndrome

Posted on September 25, 2023 by MaryO

Cushing syndrome is a metabolic disease caused by chronic exposure to high levels of glucocorticoids. It can present as an endocrine emergency due to a rapid increase in circulating cortisol leading to increased risk of cardiovascular disease and infection. Etomidate rapidly reduces plasma cortisol levels by inhibiting the action of 11β-hidroxilase. We report the case of a patient with severe hypercortisolaemia accompanied by metabolic and psychiatric disorders in whom administration of etomidate reduced preoperative levels of cortisol.

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome is a metabolic disease caused by chronic exposure to high levels of glucocorticoids. The main causes are ectopic ACTH secretion, adrenal tumours (adenomas or carcinomas), adrenal hyperplasia, and administration of exognous glucocorticoids—the latter being the most common aetiology.1

In most cases, Cushing’s syndrome presents an indolent course for years before diagnosis is made, although it can sometime present as an endocrine emergency due to a rapid increase in circulating cortisol levels.2 In these cases, treatment to control hypercortisolaemia must be started quickly due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with the potentially life-threatening metabolic, infectious, and neuropsychiatric alterations that occur in this syndrome.1, 2, 3, 4

The options for treating Cushing’s syndrome include surgery, radiotherapy, and pharmacological treatment. The most commonly used drugs are adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors (ketoconazole, metyrapone),3 but this treatment is not always well tolerated and its efficacy is limited.2 Etomidate is a drug from the imidazole family that inhibits the enzyme 11β-hydroxylase, and can reduce cortisol secretion within 48−72 h.2

Section snippets

Case report

Our patient was a 27-year-old woman with no known drug allergies or personal history of interest. She was studied in April 2021 for anxious-depressive symptoms with rapidly evolving paranoid ideation and hirsutism. A Nugent test was performed, which was positive (46.1 mcg/dl), and cortisol in urine was measured (2715 mcg/24 h), leading to a diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome.

A CT scan showed a large mass on the right adrenal gland, compatible with a primary adrenal gland tumour (Fig. 1).

Discussion

Endogenous Cushing’s syndrome is characterized by over-production of cortisol. In patients such as ours, the syndrome presents in its most serious form, with very high hypercortisolaemia and metabolic, cardiovascular, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Cushing’s syndrome is a medical emergency due to its association with several comorbidities and its high rate of mortality.5 The first therapeutic option is surgical resection of the underlying tumour; however, the accompanying hypercortisolaemia

Conclusion

In its severe form, Cushing’s syndrome is a medical emergency that must be rapidly controlled.

Etomidate is both safe and effective, and has shown promising results in the treatment of severe hypercortisolaemia.

We believe that these patients should be admitted to the Anaesthesia Intensive Care Unit during etomidate therapy in order to monitor their level of consciousness, lung function, and haemodynamics, and to closely monitor cortisol and electrolyte levels.

Ethical considerations

Informed consent was obtained for the use of patient information for teaching and research purposes in accordance with our hospital protocol.

Conflict of interests

None.

Funding

The authors have not received any funding for this manuscript.

References (8)

  • A. Ferriere et al.

    Cushing’s syndrome: Treatment and new therapeutic approaches

    Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2020)
  • Juszczak A, Morris D, Grossman A. Cushing’s Syndrome [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc; 2000 [revised…
  • T.B. Carroll et al.

    Continuous Etomidate Infusion for the Management of Severe Cushing Syndrome: Validation of a Standard Protocol

    J Endocr Soc

    (2018)
  • V.A. Preda et al.

    Etomidate in the management of hypercortisolaemia in Cushing’s syndrome: a review

    Eur J Endocrinol

    (2012)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text

© 2023 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Filed under: Cushing's, Rare Diseases, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »