The Outcome of Abnormal Glucose Metabolism and Its Clinical Features in Patients With Cushing’s Disease After Curative Surgery

Posted on July 27, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the outcomes of abnormal glucose metabolism and its clinical characteristics in patients with Cushing’s disease (CD) who achieved biochemical remission after surgery.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with CD who achieved biochemical remission and underwent regular follow-up after surgery were enrolled. Pre- and postoperative clinical data were collected and analyzed.

Result

151CD patients were included, of whom 80 (53 %) had preoperative abnormal glucose metabolism, including 56 with diabetes mellitus (DM) and 24 with impaired glucose regulation (IGR). At one year after surgery, 57 patients exhibited improved glucose metabolism, accompanied by a significant reduction in the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Improvements were mainly observed at 3 and 6 months after surgery. At one-year after surgery, there were 20 patients with diabetes and 16 with IGR. Compared to those with NGT, these individuals exhibited a higher prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, fatty liver, and abnormal bone metabolism.

Conclusion

CD patients demonstrated a high incidence of abnormal glucose metabolism. Notably, approximately two-thirds demonstrated improved glucose metabolism one year after curative surgery, with the greatest improvements observed at 3- to 6-month postoperative follow-up.

Introduction

Cushing’s disease (CD) is characterized by excessive endogenous cortisol production caused by pituitary adrenocorticotropic hormone adenoma and is the main cause of Cushing’s syndrome (CS). Surgical resection of the tumor is the preferred treatment. Prolonged exposure to hypercortisolism increases the risk of metabolic abnormalities, including obesity, hypertension, glucose and lipid abnormalities, osteoporosis, etc. Additionally, it significantly elevates the risk of infection, thrombosis, and hypokalemia. Abnormal glucose metabolism is a common complication of CS, with an incidence ranging from 13.1 % to 47 %[1], and diabetes is an independent risk factor for mortality in CD patients[2].
Previous clinical studies have found that metabolic abnormalities such as diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia improve in CS patients who achieve biochemical remission after surgical treatment. However, the concept of improvement in glucose metabolism, the incidence of improvement, and its related factors are inconsistent in various reports. Previous studies primarily assessed the outcome of glucose metabolism based on plasma glucose results at a single fixed follow-up time after surgery. The lack of regular follow-up data makes it difficult to clearly understand the trend of postoperative plasma glucose changes, and there are no clinical data on when glucose metabolism begins to improve or change. Therefore, this study retrospectively analyzed the follow-up data of patients with Cushing’s disease in our hospital before and after surgery, and monitored the changes in glucose metabolism, to explore the characteristics and clinical features of such changes in patients with Cushing’s disease who achieved remission from CD following surgery..

Access through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your organization

Section snippets

Subjects

This study enrolled hospitalized patients with Cushing’s disease at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2014 to February 2020. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Age ≥ 18 years; (2) diagnosis of Cushing’s disease according to the 2021 Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Cushing’s Disease, confirmed by pathology[3]; (3) biochemical remission after transsphenoidal surgery; (4) complete preoperative data and regular follow-up visits (including visits at 1, 3, 6, and

Patients’ baseline characteristics

A total of 168 patients with CD were admitted to Huashan Hospital from 2014 to 2020 with pathological diagnosis and regular postoperative follow-up; however, 17 patients were excluded due to no biochemical remission after surgery or relapse during follow-up (Fig. 1). Ultimately, 151 patients (32 males and 119 females) were included in this study. The baseline characteristics of the included patients were shown in Table 1. There were 80 cases (53 %) complicated with abnormal glucose metabolism

Discussion

CD was a rare disease often associated with abnormal glucose metabolism. Based on medical history and OGTT screening, we found that over half (53 %) of CD patients exhibited abnormal glucose metabolism before surgery, with 37.1 % being diagnosed with diabetes. Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of diabetes in CS patients ranged from 13.1 % to 47 %, and most reports falling between 35 % and 45 %, which is consistent with our findings [1,12,13]. However, it should be noted that CD

Author contributions

Q.C. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Q.C., Y.L., X.L., Q.S., W.S., and H.Z. collected the data. Y.L., Z.Z., M.H., S.Z., and H.Y. recruited patients. J.Z., Y.S., and S.Z. conducted the study design and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qiaoli Cui: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Yujia Li: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Xiaoyu Liu: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Quanya Sun: Investigation, Data curation. Wanwan Sun: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Min He: Project administration, Investigation. Jie Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the patients who participated in this study and all the doctors who contributed to the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. This work was supported by grants from the Multidisciplinary Diagnosis and Treatment (MDT) demonstration project in research hospitals (Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, NO: DGF501069/017), National Science and Technology Major Project (NO: 2023ZD0506800，2023ZD0506802), 2023 Ningbo International Cooperation Program (NO: 2023H024).

References (16)

  • R.N. Clayton et al.

    Mortality in patients with Cushing’s disease more than 10 years after remission: a multicentre, multinational, retrospective cohort study

    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol

    (2016)
  • M. Fleseriu et al.

    Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update

    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol

    (2021)
  • C. Scaroni et al.

    Glucose Metabolism Abnormalities in Cushing Syndrome: from Molecular Basis to Clinical Management

    Endocr Rev

    (2017)
  • C. Dai et al.

    Surgical outcome of transsphenoidal surgery in Cushing’s disease: a case series of 1106 patients from a single center over 30 years

    Endocrine

    (2022)
  • E. Valassi et al.

    Delayed remission after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with Cushing’s disease

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2010)
  • X. He et al.

    Glucocorticoid Withdrawal Syndrome following treatment of endogenous Cushing Syndrome

    (2022)
  • E.V. Varlamov et al.

    Perioperative Management of a Patient with Cushing Disease

    J Endocr Soc

    (2022)
  • Q. Cui et al.

    The recovery time of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis after curative surgery in Cushing’s disease and its related factor

    Endocrine

    (2023)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Reconstructive Liposuction for Residual Lipodystrophy After Remission of Cushing’s Disease

Posted on July 3, 2025 by MaryO

​Abstract

Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is often presented due to an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary adenoma, characterized by high chronic cortisol levels. Surgical resection of the pituitary adenoma is the primary treatment, but long-term metabolic and physical sequelae can persist, affecting psychological well-being and social functioning. Glucocorticoids are directly involved in alterations of fat metabolism, favoring centripetal adiposity. Even after hormonal normalization, patients may experience residual lipodystrophy. Impairment of body image may cause psychological distress and social isolation. The objective is to illustrate the potential therapeutic value of reconstructive liposuction in restoring body image and psychological well-being in a patient with persistent lipodystrophy after Cushing’s disease remission.

We report a case of a 16-year-old female with recurrent Cushing’s disease secondary to a pituitary microadenoma, confirmed by elevated urinary free cortisol and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It was initially treated with transsphenoidal resection in 2019; disease recurrence was confirmed and again treated in 2024. Despite intervention, the prolonged hypercortisolism developed into secondary lipodystrophy, leading to severe body image dissatisfaction and social withdrawal. Thyroid function remained euthyroid, ruling out metabolic contributors. Because of the psychological distress caused by persistent fat redistribution, the patient underwent elective liposuction in 2025. Postoperative follow-up revealed reduced psychological distress and improved well-being and self-esteem. Reconstructive liposuction can play a key role in the treatment and management of persistent post-CS lipodystrophy, contributing significantly to psychological recovery. Prospective studies evaluating surgical criteria and long-term psychosocial outcomes are needed to define eligibility criteria and assess outcomes, leading to the development of clinical guidelines for aesthetic interventions in post-CS recovery.

Introduction

Corticotroph pituitary adenomas (corticotropinomas) are pituitary tumors that secrete excess adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), causing endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS). Most of these adenomas are sporadic and monoclonal, although in some rare cases, they are associated with germline mutations (e.g., in USP8) or genetic syndromes [1,2]. Clinically, excess ACTH causes a classic presentation with centripetal obesity, purple striae, muscle asthenia, hypertension, and emotional disturbances such as depression or anxiety [3-5]. Chronically elevated cortisol levels promote fat deposition in central body regions – face, neck, torso, and abdomen – at the expense of relative thinning of the limbs [3], leading to lipodystrophy that can seriously affect the patient’s quality of life.

At the molecular level, glucocorticoids stimulate the differentiation of preadipocytes into mature adipocytes and enhance lipoprotein lipase activity in peripheral fat tissues [6], thereby increasing the uptake of circulating fatty acids and the storage of triglycerides. At the same time, they increase hepatic lipogenesis and modulate cortisol receptor homeostasis (e.g., 11β-HSD1 in adipose tissue), favoring visceral fat distribution [6]. Although glucocorticoids can induce acute lipolysis, they exert chronic lipogenic effects – especially in subcutaneous adipose tissue – which promotes fat accumulation in the face, neck, and trunk [6]. This central adiposity, characteristic of CS, is further enhanced by increased hepatic lipogenesis and the overexpression of 11β-HSD1 in adipose tissue, which amplifies the local action of cortisol [6].

Case Presentation

In 2019, a 16-year-old female patient was initially diagnosed with a 4 × 3 mm pituitary microadenoma (Figure 1), following clinical suspicion of Cushing’s disease. The diagnosis was confirmed through imaging studies and endocrinological testing, which revealed consistently elevated urinary free cortisol levels ranging from 459 to 740.07 µg/24 hours (normal range: <50 µg/24 hours), indicative of endogenous hypercortisolism. No dynamic load tests (such as dexamethasone suppression or ACTH stimulation) were performed, as the diagnosis was supported by the clinical context and laboratory findings. Moreover, no clinical or biochemical evidence of adrenal insufficiency was observed during follow-up.

T1-weighted-sagittal-MRI-scan-showing-a-corticotroph-pituitary-microadenoma-(4-×-3-mm)-circled-in-red
Figure 1: T1-weighted sagittal MRI scan showing a corticotroph pituitary microadenoma (4 × 3 mm) circled in red

The lesion is localized within the anterior pituitary gland, consistent with an ACTH-secreting adenoma causing Cushing’s disease in the patient.

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone

The patient underwent transsphenoidal endonasal resection of the pituitary tumor in 2019. Although initially successful, disease recurrence was confirmed, and a second endonasal transsphenoidal surgery was performed in 2024. Despite these interventions, the prolonged hypercortisolism led to the development of secondary lipodystrophy, manifesting as centripetal fat accumulation, a dorsal fat pad, and disproportionate truncal adiposity (Figure 2). These physical alterations had a significant psychosocial impact, as reported by the patient during follow-up visits, resulting in body image dissatisfaction, low self-esteem, and social withdrawal. No formal psychometric scales were administered.

Preoperative-and-intraoperative-images-of-the-patient
Figure 2: Preoperative and intraoperative images of the patient

A and B panels show the anterior and posterior views prior to liposuction, demonstrating centripetal adipose accumulation characteristic of Cushing’s syndrome. The C panel shows the intraoperative stage following abdominal and flank liposuction, with placement of drainage tubes, and visible reduction in subcutaneous fat volume.

A thyroid function panel revealed a slightly elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level (4.280 μUI/mL; reference range: 0.270-4.200), with total and free T3 and T4 values within normal limits, ruling out clinically significant hypothyroidism as a confounding factor for her phenotype. The biochemical profile suggested a euthyroid state, despite borderline TSH elevation, which was interpreted as a subclinical or adaptive response to chronic cortisol excess (Table 1).

Parameter Normal Range Patient’s Value
Cortisol (µg/24 hour) 58.0 – 403.0 459.5 – 740.07
TSH (µUI/mL) 0.270 – 4.200 4.280
Total T3 (ng/mL) 0.80 – 2.00 1.02
Free T3 (pg/mL) 2.00 – 4.40 3.33
Total T4 (µg/dL) 4.50 – 12.00 8.63
Free T4 (ng/dL) 0.92 – 1.68 1.36
Table 1: Comparison between the patient’s hormone levels and standard reference ranges

A persistently elevated 24-hour urinary cortisol range is observed, consistent with endogenous hypercortisolism. The thyroid profile remains within normal limits, with a mildly elevated TSH in the absence of overt thyroid dysfunction. These findings support the functional and metabolic profile characteristic of Cushing’s syndrome.

TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone

The procedure targeted lipodystrophic regions identified through clinical examination and patient concerns, rather than formal imaging or anthropometric measurements. It aimed to restore body contour, alleviate somatic distress, and improve her overall self-perception and quality of life. Postoperative follow-up revealed patient-reported improvements in body image and psychological well-being. While these outcomes were not evaluated with formal instruments, the clinical improvement was evident and significant from the patient’s perspective, highlighting the role of plastic surgery not only as a reconstructive tool, but also as a therapeutic strategy for restoring dignity and social functioning in patients recovering from CS.

Discussion

After successful treatment of the pituitary adenoma, many metabolic parameters improve; however, fat distribution usually only partially reverses. Longitudinal studies show that, in the medium term, weight and abdominal circumference decrease, and there is some redistribution of fat toward the limbs following cortisol remission [3].

For example, Bavaresco et al. (2024) observed that, after hormone levels normalized, total fat was reduced and part of it shifted from the visceral area to the legs [3]. Nevertheless, their review highlights that a significant proportion of patients continue to present with residual visceral adiposity and moderate obesity (body mass index, or BMI >25), despite hormonal control [7]. In our case, truncal adiposity persisted based on clinical assessment, though no formal anthropometric measurements were performed.

Although liposuction is not traditionally considered first-line therapy for cortisol-induced lipodystrophy secondary to Cushing’s disease, increasing evidence from related lipodystrophic syndromes supports its clinical utility. For instance, in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated cervicodorsal lipodystrophy, Barton et al. (2021) conducted a 15-year retrospective analysis comparing liposuction and excisional lipectomy, finding that 80% of patients undergoing liposuction alone experienced recurrence, while none of the patients treated with excisional lipectomy showed recurrence – albeit with a higher risk of postoperative seroma formation [7]. These findings underscore that, while liposuction may be less durable than excision, it remains a viable option for selected cases, especially when used for contouring or as an adjunct [7]. Similarly, the Endocrine Society guidelines on lipodystrophy management emphasize the importance of personalized approaches, particularly when localized adipose accumulation contributes to persistent metabolic dysfunction or psychological distress [8]. Akinci et al. (2024) also highlight that, even in partial or atypical lipodystrophy syndromes, patients often report substantial impairment in quality of life due to disfiguring fat redistribution [9]. In this context, liposuction should not be dismissed as merely cosmetic but considered part of a functional and psychosocial rehabilitation strategy. The present case exemplifies this rationale, as the patient – despite biochemical remission of Cushing’s disease – continued to experience debilitating body image disturbances and emotional distress, which were ameliorated following targeted liposuction. This supports the integration of body-contouring procedures into multidisciplinary care protocols for endocrine-related lipodystrophies, especially when residual physical stigma persists after hormonal normalization [7-9].

Body image disorders, such as those secondary to CS or lipodystrophy, significantly impact self-perception, self-esteem, and social functioning. For example, a study by Alcalar et al. (2013) reported that patients with active Cushing’s disease had significantly lower SF-36 scores – particularly in emotional role functioning and mental health domains – compared to controls [10]. Similarly, Akinci et al. (2024) described that patients with partial lipodystrophy demonstrated marked reductions in EQ-5D index values and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, indicating impaired health-related quality of life [9]. These findings underscore that fat redistribution disorders can substantially compromise psychosocial well-being, even after endocrine remission.

This is especially relevant in women, where sociocultural stereotypes surrounding female physical appearance reinforce thinness, symmetry, and youthfulness as standards of personal value and social acceptance [1]. This societal context amplifies body dissatisfaction when visible physical changes occur, even after the clinical remission of endocrine diseases, often leading to social withdrawal, anxiety, or depression [3,10]. Within this framework, plastic surgery – such as reconstructive liposuction – has proven to be a valuable therapeutic tool, offering physical restoration that can enhance self-confidence and promote social reintegration [4]. Postoperative follow-up in our case revealed patient-reported improvements in body image and psychological well-being. While these outcomes were not assessed using formal psychometric tools, the clinical benefit was evident from the patient’s perspective. This aligns with prior findings demonstrating the psychosocial value of reconstructive surgery, which can enhance self-esteem and social reintegration after physical disfigurement [11,12]. These observations underscore the role of plastic surgery not only as a reconstructive intervention, but also as a therapeutic strategy for restoring dignity and quality of life in patients recovering from CS.

Although validated psychometric instruments such as the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI) and the Dysmorphic Concern Questionnaire (DCQ) are available to assess body image disturbances, these were not applied in our case. Nonetheless, they represent useful tools for evaluating subjective impact in both clinical practice and research settings. The BIQLI evaluates the effect of body image on various aspects of life – social interactions, self-worth, sexuality, and emotional well-being – using a Likert scale ranging from -3 (very negative impact) to +3 (very positive impact), providing a quantifiable assessment of its influence on quality of life [5]. The DCQ, on the other hand, identifies dysfunctional concerns about perceived physical flaws by assessing behaviors such as avoidance, mirror checking, and concealment; higher scores are associated with suspected body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) [6]. These tools are useful for initial diagnosis, surgical candidate selection, and postoperative follow-up, as they objectively measure subjective changes related to body image. Their advantages include ease of use, clinical validity, and applicability in research settings. However, they also have limitations: they do not replace comprehensive psychological evaluation, may be influenced by cultural context, and do not detect deeper psychiatric comorbidities. Therefore, a multidisciplinary and ethically grounded approach – integrating plastic surgery, endocrinology, and psychology – is essential to ensure safe and patient-centered treatment planning.

Aesthetic liposuction is associated with significant improvements in perceived body image and patient quality of life [11]. For example, Papadopulos et al. (2019) observed statistically significant increases in perception of one’s own body appearance and high satisfaction with postoperative results [12]. These aesthetic gains were accompanied by psychological improvements: the same study documented an increase in emotional stability and a reduction in postoperative anxiety [12]. Similarly, Kamundi (2023) found that nearly all assessed dimensions of quality of life improved after liposuction (p < 0.05 in most of them). Altogether, these findings suggest that liposuction not only corrects physical alterations typical of CS, but also strengthens self-esteem and psychological well-being by substantially improving satisfaction with one’s body image [11].

Moreover, self-esteem influences adherence to medical treatments and lifestyle changes. By improving self-image through reconstructive surgery, it is plausible that the patient feels more motivated to maintain healthy habits, such as diet and regular exercise, that prevent metabolic relapse [12,13].

Nonetheless, it is important to emphasize that liposuction, in this context, should be viewed as a reconstructive complement, not a primary treatment. There are no established protocols or formal guidelines that explicitly include plastic surgery in the care of cured CS; the decision is personalized, based on the residual functional and psychological impact.

Conclusions

Reconstructive plastic surgery, though not a primary therapeutic approach for CS, plays a key role in enhancing patients’ quality of life following remission. Liposuction, in particular, offers a safe and effective solution for persistent lipodystrophy, providing aesthetic benefits with minimal scarring, rapid recovery, and low complication rates in properly selected patients.

This case underscores the importance of addressing both physical and psychosocial sequelae after endocrine stabilization. A multidisciplinary approach – encompassing endocrinology, neurosurgery, and plastic surgery – not only restores physical appearance but also contributes to emotional recovery, self-esteem, and overall patient satisfaction.

References

  1. Tatsi 😄 Cushing syndrome/disease in children and adolescents. Endotext [Internet]. Feingold KR, Ahmed SF, Anawalt B, et al. (ed): MDText.com, Inc., South Dartmouth (MA); 2000.
  2. Mir N, Chin SA, Riddell MC, Beaudry JL: Genomic and non-genomic actions of glucocorticoids on adipose tissue lipid metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2021, 22:8503. 10.3390/ijms22168503
  3. Bavaresco A, Mazzeo P, Lazzara M, Barbot M: Adipose tissue in cortisol excess: what Cushing’s syndrome can teach us?. Biochem Pharmacol. 2024, 223:116137. 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116137
  4. Nieman LK: Molecular derangements and the diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2022, 43:852-77. 10.1210/endrev/bnab046
  5. Patni N, Chard C, Araujo-Vilar D, Phillips H, Magee DA, Akinci B: Diagnosis, treatment and management of lipodystrophy: the physician perspective on the patient journey. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024, 19:263. 10.1186/s13023-024-03245-3
  6. Peckett AJ, Wright DC, Riddell MC: The effects of glucocorticoids on adipose tissue lipid metabolism. Metabolism. 2011, 60:1500-10. 10.1016/j.metabol.2011.06.012
  7. Barton N, Moore R, Prasad K, Evans G: Excisional lipectomy versus liposuction in HIV-associated lipodystrophy. Arch Plast Surg. 2021, 48:685-90. 10.5999/aps.2020.02285
  8. Brown RJ, Araujo-Vilar D, Cheung PT, et al.: The diagnosis and management of lipodystrophy syndromes: a multi-society practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016, 101:4500-11. 10.1210/jc.2016-2466
  9. Akinci B, Celik Gular M, Oral EA: Lipodystrophy syndromes: presentation and treatment. Endotext [Internet]. Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al. (ed): MDText.com, Inc., South Dartmouth (MA); 2024.
  10. Alcalar N, Ozkan S, Kadioglu P, Celik O, Cagatay P, Kucukyuruk B, Gazioglu N: Evaluation of depression, quality of life and body image in patients with Cushing’s disease. Pituitary. 2013, 16:333-40. 10.1007/s11102-012-0425-5
  11. Kamundi RK: Determining the Impact of Liposuction on Patient Satisfaction of Quality of Life and Body Image: A Prospective Study in Nairobi, Kenya. University of Nairobi, Nairobi; 2023.
  12. Papadopulos NA, Kolassa MJ, Henrich G, Herschbach P, Kovacs L, Machens HG, Klöppel M: Quality of life following aesthetic liposuction: a prospective outcome study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019, 72:1363-72. 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.04.008
  13. Saariniemi KM, Salmi AM, Peltoniemi HH, Charpentier P, Kuokkanen HOM: Does liposuction improve body image and symptoms of eating disorders?. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015, 3:461. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000440

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/376886-reconstructive-liposuction-for-residual-lipodystrophy-after-remission-of-cushings-disease-a-case-report#!/

​

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Rare Diseases, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Double Synchronous Functional Pituitary Adenomas Causing Acromegaly and Subclinical Cushing Disease

Posted on July 1, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

Double pituitary adenomas with growth hormone (GH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion are very rare. They are responsible for acromegaly with hypercortisolism. Subclinical corticotropic adenomas are exceptional.
Herein, we report the case of a patient with double functional pituitary adenomas causing acromegaly and subclinical Cushing’s disease. A 45-year-old woman was referred to our Department for suspected acromegaly. Her past medical history included diabetes mellitus treated with oral antidiabetic drugs and hypertension.
On physical examination, she had a large prominent forehead, thickened lips, increased interdental spacing, prognathism, and enlarged hands and feet. No signs of hypercortisolism were found. Biological investigations showed an elevated insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level at 555 ng/mL, a GH nadir after 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at 2 ng/mL, a morning cortisol level at 158 ng/mL, an ACTH level at 64 pg/mL, a thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level at 2.26 mIU/L, and a free thyroxine (FT4) level at 12.8 pmol/L. Cortisol level after low-dose dexamethasone suppression test was 86 ng/mL.
The diagnosis of acromegaly associated with Cushing’s disease was established. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging showed a pituitary macroadenoma with no clear limits. The patient underwent transsphenoidal tumor resection. The pathological examination revealed two separate pituitary adenomas. The positivity to ACTH and GH was 100% and 80%, respectively.
This case emphasizes the necessity of an evaluation of all the pituitary axes in case of adenoma in order not to miss a double hormonal secretion or more even in the absence of suggestive clinical signs.

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Rare Diseases | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Postoperative Initiation of Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Cushing’s Disease (PIT-CD):

Posted on June 28, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

Background

Pituitary surgical intervention remains the preferred treatment for Cushing’s disease (CD) while postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant risk. Whether to prescribe pharmacological thromboprophylaxis presents a clinical dilemma, balancing the benefit of reducing VTE risk with the potential for increasing hemorrhagic events in these patients. Currently, strong evidence and established protocols for routine pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in this population are lacking. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial is warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of combined pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis in reducing postoperative VTE risk in patients with CD.

Methods

This investigator-initiated, multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis compared to mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone in postoperative patients with CD. A total of 206 patients diagnosed with CD who will be undergoing transsphenoidal surgery will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either combined pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis (intervention) or mechanical thromboprophylaxis only (control). The primary outcome is the risk of VTE within 12 weeks following surgery.

Discussion

This trial represents a significant milestone in evaluating the efficacy of combined pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis in reducing VTE events in postoperative CD patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04486859, first registered on 22 July 2020.

Peer Review reports

Administrative information

Note: the numbers in curly brackets in this protocol refer to SPIRIT checklist item numbers. The order of the items has been modified to group similar items (see http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/spirit-2013-statement-defining-standard-protocol-items-for-clinical-trials/).

Title {1} Postoperative Initiation of Thromboprophylaxis in patients with Cushing’s Disease (PIT-CD): a randomized control trial
Trial registration {2a and 2b} ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04486859, first registered on 22 July 2020

WHO Trial Registration Data Set (Supplement)
Protocol version {3} Date: 1 July 2021, Version 5.0
Funding {4} The trial is supported by Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (SHDC2020CR2004A).
Author details {5a} Nidan Qiao, Min He, Zhao Ye, Wei Gong, Zengyi Ma, Yifei Yu, Zhenyu Wu, Lin Lu, Huijuan Zhu, Yong Yao, Zhihong Liao, Haijun Wang, Huiwen Tan, Bowen Cai, Yerong Yu, Ting Lei, Yan Yang, Changzhen Jiang, Xiaofang Yan, Yanying Guo, Yuan Chen, Hongying Ye, Yongfei Wang, Nicholas A. Tritos, Zhaoyun Zhang, Yao Zhao.
Name and contact information for the trial sponsor {5b} Investigator initiated trial, principal investigators, post-production correspondence:

Yao Zhao (YZ), Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 mid Wulumuqi Rd, Shanghai 200040, China. Email: zhaoyao@huashan.org.cn

Zhaoyun Zhang (ZZ), Department of Endocrinology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 mid Wulumuqi Rd, Shanghai 200040, China. Email: zhangzhaoyun@fudan.edu.cn
Role of sponsor {5c} The trial sponsor holds responsibility for all key elements of the trial’s execution, including its design, data collection, management, analysis, interpretation of results, and reporting. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board monitors data safety and participant protection to ensure the trial’s integrity and the safety of participants.

Introduction

Background and rationale {6a}

Cushing’s disease (CD) is characterized by hypercortisolism resulting from an adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma [1]. Tumor-directed surgical intervention remains the preferred treatment for this condition. Patients with Cushing’s disease commonly experience a hypercoagulable state due to activation of the coagulation system [2], suppression of anticoagulation and fibrinolytic pathways, and enhanced platelet activation, significantly increasing their risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Postoperative VTE risk is further exacerbated by factors such as intravenous medications, blood loss, and prolonged bed rest. Multiple studies report postoperative VTE risks in patients with CD ranging from 3 to 20% [2,3,4,5].

The Endocrine Society and Pituitary Society recommends considering perioperative thromboprophylaxis as a strategy to reduce VTE risk in patients with CD [1, 6]. However, this recommendation was based on a single study that investigated perioperative prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with Cushing’s syndrome [7]. The study was limited by its small sample size, single-center nature, and retrospective design. Crucial details such as the optimal timing for initiation, choice of anticoagulant, and duration of therapy were not established. Recent surveys of European and US centers indicate that thromboprophylaxis protocols are not routinely employed, and there is considerable heterogeneity in prophylactic practices across centers [8, 9].

The primary risk associated with thromboprophylaxis is postoperative hemorrhage. In patients with CD, although the risk of bleeding is significantly lower than after a typical craniotomy, complications such as intrasellar hemorrhage and nasal bleeding may still occur. Due to its retrospective nature, the aforementioned study cannot conclusively determine whether the benefits of thromboprophylaxis outweigh its risks. Consequently, guidelines from hematology and neurosurgical societies have concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to support a standardized VTE prophylaxis regimen for neurosurgical patients [10,11,12]. Nevertheless, both the American Society of Hematology and European guidelines suggest that a combination of pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis may be justified for higher-risk subgroups [10, 13].

Objectives {7}

Due to conflicting recommendations and lack of a definitive study to determine whether the benefits outweigh the risks regarding the use of pharmacological antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with CD following pituitary surgery, we initiated this study, called Postoperative Initiation of Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Cushing’s Disease (PIT-CD). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the combined use of pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis reduces VTE events compared to mechanical prophylaxis alone in postoperative CD patients.

Trial design {8}

Our hypothesis was that pharmacological prophylaxis in combination with intermittent pneumatic compression would be superior to intermittent pneumatic compression alone.

The PIT-CD study is an open-label, multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial with open-label treatment designed to assess the efficacy of combined pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis compared to mechanical prophylaxis alone. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The patient flow is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient flow

Methods: participants, interventions and outcomes

Study setting {9}

This study was initiated in tertiary centers across China with expertise in managing patients with CD. Currently, seven centers (see Supplements) are actively recruiting patients for the study.

Eligibility criteria {10}

Inclusion criteria

Patients are eligible for inclusion if they meet the following criteria:

  1. 1.Age between 18 and 65 years (inclusive)
  2. 2.Diagnosed with CD and scheduled to undergo transsphenoidal surgery
  3. 3.Either newly diagnosed or recurrent disease

A diagnosis of CD is confirmed based on the following criteria:

  1. A.Twenty-four-hour urine free cortisol > upper normal boundary and low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (overnight or over two days): serum cortisol > 1.8 µg/dL
  2. B.8 AM serum adrenocorticotropic hormone > 20 pg/mL
  3. C.High-dose dexamethasone suppression test: serum cortisol or 24-h urine cortisol suppression > 50%
  4. D.Inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) indicates elevated adrenocorticotropic hormone central gradient consistent with secretion from a central source

Patients are diagnosed with CD if both criteria A and B are met, in addition to either C or D. In patients with tumors smaller than 6 mm on MRI, IPSS indicating a central source is essential.

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded from the study if they meet any of the following criteria:

  1. 1.History of VTE before surgery or within 24 h post-surgery
  2. 2.Acute bacterial endocarditis
  3. 3.Major bleeding events within the previous 6 months
  4. 4.Thrombocytopenia
  5. 5.Active gastrointestinal ulcers
  6. 6.History of stroke
  7. 7.High risk of bleeding due to clotting abnormalities
  8. 8.Participation in other clinical trials within the last three months
  9. 9.Contraindications to rivaroxaban (e.g., renal dysfunction with eGFR < 50 mL/min)
  10. 10.Presence of malignant diseases
  11. 11.Severe mental or neurological disorders
  12. 12.Presence of intracranial vascular abnormalities
  13. 13.Contraindications to mechanical prophylactic anticoagulation
  14. 14.Pregnancy
  15. 15.Any other condition that researchers deem inappropriate for study participation (e.g., oral contraceptive use, history of thrombophilia)

Who will obtain informed consent? {26a}

Patients with CD are provided with detailed information about the clinical trial, including known and foreseeable risks and potential adverse events. Investigators are required to thoroughly explain these details to the patients or their guardians if the patients lack capacity to provide consent. Following a comprehensive explanation and discussion, both the patients or their guardians and the investigators sign and date the informed consent form.

Additional consent provisions for collection and use of participant data and biological specimens {26b}

N/A. Biological specimens are unnecessary in this trial. Participant data was not intended to be included in any other ancillary studies.

Interventions

Explanation for the choice of comparators {6b}

Participants in the control arm of the study will be required to use a limb compression system twice daily, for 30 min each session, from the 2nd to the 7th day post-surgery. The intermittent pneumatic compression devices are the standard of care in the prevention deep vein thrombosis in many literatures [14, 15].

Intervention description {11a}

Participants in the intervention arm of the study will be required to use the same limb compression system, also for 30 min twice daily from the 2nd to the 7th day post-surgery. Additionally, participants will receive subcutaneous injections of low molecular weight heparin (4000 IU) once daily from the 2nd to the 4th day post-surgery. Starting on the 5th day and continuing through the 28th day post-surgery, participants will take oral rivaroxaban tablets (10 mg) once daily.

Criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions {11b}

Participants have the right to withdraw their consent at any time without providing a reason, thereby terminating their participation in the study. Any withdrawal and the reasons, if known, will be documented. Criteria for premature termination include the following: occurrence of the primary outcome (patients will still be monitored for safety for 12 weeks), failure to meet inclusion criteria, fulfillment of exclusion criteria, or loss of contact.

Strategies to improve adherence to interventions {11c}

Several strategies will be employed to maintain adherence to interventions in this trial. Participants will receive thorough preoperative education on the importance of pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis in preventing VTE if they are assigned to the intervention arm or the importance of mechanical prophylaxis if they are assigned to the control arm. Detailed instructions on the use of the limb compression system and administration of rivaroxaban will be provided. Pill counts will be performed to document adherence in the intervention group.

Relevant concomitant care permitted or prohibited during the trial {11d}

N/A. Participants in both groups will receive treatment according to the current standard-of-care.

Provisions for post-trial care {30}

Participants experiencing adverse events will be followed until the events are resolved. Other participants will be regularly followed in accordance with clinical routine clinical practice. Participants in the trial are compensated in the event of trial-associated harms.

Outcomes {12}

Primary outcome

The primary outcome of the study is the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 12 weeks after surgery. VTE is defined as either deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), regardless of whether the cases are symptomatic or asymptomatic.

Secondary outcomes

The secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) risk of DVT within 12 weeks after surgery; (2) risk of PE within 12 weeks after surgery; (3) risk of symptomatic DVT, symptomatic PE, or symptomatic VTE within 12 weeks after surgery; (4) risk of VTE-associated mortality within 12 weeks after surgery; (5) risk of all-cause mortality within 12 weeks after surgery.

“Symptomatic” is defined as the presence of one or more of the following symptoms attributed to VTE: pain or swelling in the affected leg; chest pain, dyspnea, or decreased oxygen saturation.

Safety outcomes

Safety outcomes include the following: (1) major bleeding; (2) minor bleeding; (3) hemorrhage-associated surgery; (4) hemorrhage-associated readmission; (5) coagulation disorders (APTT or INR > 2.5 normal upper boundary); (6) thrombocytopenia; (7) increase in liver function tests.

Major bleeding is defined according to the Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [16]. This includes fatal bleeding; bleeding that is symptomatic and occurs in a critical area or organ; extrasurgical site bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 20 g/L or more, or leading to transfusion of two or more units of whole blood or red cells; surgical site bleeding that requires a second intervention.

Participant timeline {13}

A schema of all trial procedures and clinical visits is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments

Sample size {14}

Our estimates are based on a retrospective study examining the effects of preventive anticoagulation during the perioperative period in Cushing syndrome [7]. This study reported that the risk of postoperative VTE was lower in patients receiving preventive anticoagulants (6%) compared to those who did not (20%). Therefore, we assume that the risk of the primary outcome in the control group is 20%, while in the intervention group it is 5% within 12 weeks. Based on these assumptions, we calculated the required sample size for each group to be is 93 using PASS software, with an alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 0.9. Accounting for an estimated 10% dropout rate, the total number of patients required is 206.

Recruitment {15}

Clinical investigators will receive training on communicating with potential patients and their relatives, documenting screening logs, and other standard operating procedures during the kick-off meeting at each participating center. All centers will recruit patients competitively, and recruitment progress will be monitored to track the process. The estimated recruitment rate is 8 to 10 patients per month, with an expected recruitment period of 2 years.

Assignment of interventions: allocation

Sequence generation {16a}

The randomization procedure is computer- and web-based, and is stratified by age (≤ 35 years old vs. > 35 years old), sex (female vs. male) and disease duration (≤ 2 years vs. > 2 years).

Concealment mechanism {16b}

Participants are randomized using a web-based randomization system (edc.fudan.edu.cn). This system maintains allocation concealment by withholding the randomization code until screening is complete.

Implementation {16c}

Investigators will enroll participants, with the stratified block algorithms generating a random allocation sequence. Participant assignment through the randomization system is not subject to influence by the clinical investigators.

Assignment of interventions: blinding

Who will be blinded {17a}

This is an open-label trial, meaning that both the treating physicians and the participants are aware of the treatment allocation. However, a separate group of clinical outcome assessors (Clinical Event Committee, CEC), who are blinded to the treatment allocation, will determine the clinical outcomes. Similarly, lower limbs ultrasound and pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessments will be adjudicated by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) that is blinded to the treatment allocation. Statisticians remain blinded to treatment allocation prior to the final analysis, and the interim analyses will be conducted by a separate team from the one undertaking the final analysis.

Procedure for unblinding if needed {17b}

N/A. The design is open label.

Data collection and management

Plans for assessment and collection of outcomes {18a}

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) will be assessed using bilateral lower limb ultrasound. Asymptomatic participants will undergo evaluation at prespecified intervals (day 4, day 7, week 4, and week 12 post-intervention), while symptomatic individuals will receive immediate imaging upon presentation of clinical manifestations such as unilateral or bilateral lower extremity edema or pain. Pulmonary embolism (PE) screening will be performed via pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTA) at day 7 in asymptomatic cases, with expedited assessment triggered by acute symptoms (e.g., chest pain, dyspnea) or radiographic evidence of DVT detected during lower limb ultrasonography. These events will be adjudicated by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). A CEC will be convened to assess other outcomes.

Plans to promote participant retention and complete follow-up {18b}

The initial intervention for participants takes place during the patient’s inpatient stay, during which researchers will provide detailed information about the required procedures. Participants will undergo routine follow-up at 4 weeks and 12 weeks post-surgery, with VTE-related follow-up arranged during these routine visits. Transportation and examination expenses for follow-up visits are reimbursable.

Data of those who discontinue will also be documented.

Data management {19}

Data will be kept, both on paper and in electronic databases, for at least 5 years. Data will be entered by clinical investigators using electronic case report forms (eCRFs) on a web-based platform (http://crip-ec.shdc.org.cn). The investigators will be introduced to the platform and trained in data entry during the initial kick-off meeting before the recruitment of the first study participant. Access to the study database will be restricted to authorized clinical investigators, who will use a personal ID and password to gain entry.

Confidentiality {27}

When adding a new participant to the database, identifying data (e.g., Chinese name) are entered on a form that is printed but not saved on the server. On this form, participants will be represented by a unique ID. The printed form is kept in a locked space accessible only to the principal investigator and may be used to unblind personal data if necessary.

Plans for collection, laboratory evaluation and storage of biological specimens for genetic or molecular analysis in this trial/future use {33}

N/A. There will be no biological specimens collected.

Statistical methods

Statistical methods for primary and secondary outcomes {20a}

The primary analysis will be conducted on the full analysis data set, adhering to the intention-to-treat principle, which includes all patients randomized in the study. Generalized linear models (GLMs) with binomial distribution will be employed to analyze primary, secondary, and safety outcomes. Treatment effects for these outcomes will be quantified as risk differences (RDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additionally, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated using a logistic regression model, and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated using a Cox Proportional model.

Safety analyses will be based on all randomized patients who have received the study treatment. The risk and percentages of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be summarized by treatment group. Instances of subject death will be summarized and listed. All analyses will be performed using the SAS system, version 9.4.

Interim analyses {21b}

The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) plans to convene the interim analysis meeting after randomization and 12-week follow-up visits are completed for 103 participants. The significance level for interim analysis (primary outcome) is set at 0.001 according to the Haybittle–Peto boundary principle.

Based on these analyses, the DSMB will advise the steering committee on whether the randomized comparisons in this study have demonstrated a clear benefit of the intervention. If the p-values from the interim analysis for both groups are less than 0.001, recruitment will be halted, and the study will meet the criteria for early termination. If the p-values are greater than or equal to 0.001, recruitment will continue until the planned sample size is achieved, with the final analysis significance level set at 0.049.

Methods for additional analyses (e.g., subgroup analyses) {20b}

For both primary and secondary outcomes, pre-specified subgroup analyses will be conducted based on sex, age, disease duration, and magnitude of urine free cortisol elevation.​

Methods in analysis to handle protocol non-adherence and any statistical methods to handle missing data {20c}

The primary analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat data set, which includes all randomized patients and is based on the treatment arm to which they were assigned, regardless of the therapy they actually received. A per-protocol analysis will also be performed to account for non-adherence. If appropriate, multiple imputation will be used to address any missing data in the dataset. The prespecified statistical analysis plan (SAP), developed by independent biostatisticians blinded to treatment allocation, will be prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov prior to database lock.

Plans to give access to the full protocol, participant-level data and statistical code {31c}

The trial was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier NCT04486859. Updates to reflect significant protocol amendments will be submitted. The statistical analysis protocol will also be updated prior to database locking. The datasets and statistical code are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Oversight and monitoring

Composition of the coordinating centre and trial steering committee {5d}

The trial steering committee is composed of four Chinese experts and two international experts from outside of China. Investigators in participating centers are required to attend a training course during a kick-off event organized by the principal investigator. Each investigator must confirm that they have been properly introduced to trial-specific procedures. An IRC will adjudicate primary outcomes. An independent CEC will be responsible for ensuring high-quality outcomes and minimizing inconsistencies or bias in the clinical trial data.

Composition of the data monitoring committee, its role and reporting structure {21a}

The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) consists of three members, including one statistician. The DSMB will regularly receive blinded statistical reports and monitor serious adverse events throughout the trial to assess patient safety and determine if the trial should be terminated prematurely due to safety concerns.

An initial DSMB meeting will be conducted to ensure that DSMB members fully understand the research protocol, review and approve the DSMB charter, assess the monitoring plans for safety and efficacy data, and discuss the statistical methods, including stopping rules. A second DSMB meeting will be conducted to review the interim analysis. The interim analyses and the treatment allocation data will be provided by an independent trial statistician and provided confidentially to the DSMB chairman. An ad hoc DSMB meeting may be convened by either the principal investigators or the DSMB if imminent safety issues arise during the trial.

Adverse event reporting and harms {22}

Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) are defined according to the ICH GCP guidelines. All AEs and SAEs reported by study participants or observed by investigators within the study period must be documented in the eCRF and reported to the DSMB. Additionally, SAEs must be reported to the IRB.

Anticipated adverse events, including both major and minor bleeding events (e.g., epistaxis necessitating readmission), as well as coagulation disorders, thrombocytopenia, and elevated liver function tests, will be prospectively monitored in all trial participants. Unanticipated adverse events (not pre-specified in Section {12}) will be captured through spontaneous reporting. All adverse event data will be classified and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 to ensure consistency. For reporting, we will disclose all protocol-specified adverse events from Section {12}, alongside any unanticipated events higher than Grade 3.

Frequency and plans for auditing the trial conduct {23}

The trial conduct will be regularly audited to ensure compliance with the study protocol and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Audits will be conducted by independent monitors from Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Developing Centers. These audits will involve reviewing study documentation, informed consent forms, source data verification, and adherence to the protocol. Audits will also assess data entry accuracy and the overall management of the trial. The frequency of these audits will be determined based on the recruitment rate, safety concerns, and previous audit findings.

Plans for communicating important protocol amendments to relevant parties (e.g., trial participants, ethical committees) {25}

Any modifications to the study protocol will require protocol amendments, which will be promptly submitted for approval to the Institutional Review Board. These changes will only be implemented after receiving approval from the Institutional Review Board. Once approved, ClinicalTrials.gov will be updated to reflect any significant changes. If necessary, protocol training to implement the amendments will be provided by the study team to participating centers.

Dissemination plans {31a}

After database closure and data analysis, the trial statistician will prepare a report detailing the main study results. Following this, a meeting of the investigators will be convened to discuss the findings before drafting a scientific manuscript for peer review and publication in a major scientific journal. Additionally, efforts will be made to present the results at key international conferences of neuroendocrine societies.

Discussion

This trial represents a significant milestone in evaluating the efficacy of combined pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis in reducing VTE events in postoperative CD patients. To date, no similar randomized controlled trials have addressed this specific clinical question.

Transnasal transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection is the preferred surgical approach for patients with CD. Compared to craniotomy, transsphenoidal surgery has a significantly lower risk of bleeding. The published literature indicates a bleeding risk of 0.02% following transsphenoidal surgery [17], whereas the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage after craniotomy ranges from 1% to 1.5% [18]. Therefore, for clinical practicality and safety, this study will exclusively include patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection.

Early meta-analyses indicated that low molecular weight heparin is generally safer, with a relatively lower bleeding risk compared to rivaroxaban, particularly when used for thrombosis prevention after hip and knee replacement surgeries [19]. However, recent studies have shown that rivaroxaban may have no significant difference in major bleeding and non-major bleeding risks compared to enoxaparin in thromboprophylaxis following non-major orthopedic surgeries of the lower limbs [20]. Given the risk of postoperative bleeding and the potential bleeding side effects of oral medications, LMWH was chosen for initial postoperative treatment because of its relatively lower bleeding risk. As patients prepare for discharge, the more convenient oral medication was selected for ongoing prophylaxis.

Patients who develop early VTE on the first day after surgery or despite anticoagulant use will be included in a further post hoc analysis. This will help identify risk factors for VTE. This analysis will aim to determine why VTE occurred despite anticoagulant use and explore whether specific factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, body mass index, or disease duration, are associated with increased risk. Based on our findings, recommendations may include earlier initiation of prophylaxis, dosage adjustments, or extended duration of treatment for high-risk patients.

Trial status

This protocol is based on trial protocol version 5.0, dated July 1, 2021. The first patient was enrolled in December 2020, and the final patient is expected to be enrolled by the end of 2024. While the original plan anticipated completing recruitment by December 2022, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted many districts and cities in China, leading to lockdowns that have severely delayed the implementation and recruitment for this trial.

Data availability {29}

Data will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CD:
Cushing’s disease
VTE:
Venous thromboembolism
DVT:
Deep vein thrombosis
PE:
Pulmonary embolism
CEC:
Clinical events committee
IRC:
Independent Review Committee
CTA:
Computed tomography angiography
eCRFs:
Electronic case report forms
AE:
Adverse events
SAE:
Severe adverse events
DSMB:
Data Safety Monitoring Board

References

  1. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, Ben-Shlomo A, Bertherat J, Biermasz NR, et al. Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(12):847–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  2. Feelders RA, Nieman LK. Hypercoagulability in Cushing’s syndrome: incidence, pathogenesis and need for thromboprophylaxis protocols. Pituitary. 2022;25(5):746–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-022-01261-9.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  3. White AJ, Almeida JP, Filho LM, Oyem P, Obiri-Yeboah D, Yogi-Morren D, et al. Venous Thromboembolism and Prevention Strategies in Patients with Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg. 2024;S1878–8750(24):01460–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.090.

    Article Google Scholar

  4. Waqar M, Chadwick A, Kersey J, Horner D, Kearney T, Karabatsou K, et al. Venous thromboembolism chemical prophylaxis after endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery. Pituitary. 2022;25(2):267–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-021-01195-8.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wagner J, Langlois F, Lim DST, McCartney S, Fleseriu M. Hypercoagulability and Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events in Endogenous Cushing’s Syndrome: A Systematic Meta-Analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;9:805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00805.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Murad MH, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, et al. Treatment of Cushing’s Syndrome: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(8):2807–31. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-1818.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. Boscaro M, Sonino N, Scarda A, Barzon L, Fallo F, Sartori MT, et al. Anticoagulant prophylaxis markedly reduces thromboembolic complications in Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(8):3662–6. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.8.8703.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  8. White AJ, Almeida JP, Petitt JC, Yogi-Morren D, Recinos PF, Kshettry VR. Significant Variability in Postoperative Thromboprophylaxis in Cushing’s Disease Patients: A Survey of the North American Skull Base Society and the AANS/CNS Joint Tumor Section. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023;85(5):540–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772698.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  9. Isand K, Feelders R, Brue T, Toth M, Deutschbein T, Reincke M, et al. High prevalence of venous thrombotic events in Cushing’s syndrome: data from ERCUSYN and details in relation to surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2024;190(1):75–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad176.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Anderson DR, Morgano GP, Bennett C, Dentali F, Francis CW, Garcia DA, et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients. Blood Adv. 2019;3(23):3898–944. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000975.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  11. Nyquist P, Bautista C, Jichici D, Burns J, Chhangani S, DeFilippis M, et al. Prophylaxis of Venous Thrombosis in Neurocritical Care Patients: An Evidence-Based Guideline: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0221-y.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Raksin PB, Harrop JS, Anderson PA, Arnold PM, Chi JH, Dailey AT, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Prophylaxis and Treatment of Thromboembolic Events. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(1):E39–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy367.

From https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-025-08923-6

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Treatments | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

Challenges of Cushing’s Syndrome and Bariatric Surgery

Posted on June 26, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

Cushing’s disease (CD), caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma, is challenging to diagnose, especially in obese patients post-bariatric surgery.

This report discusses a misdiagnosed case of CD in a 42-year-old obese male with hypertension. CD was suspected only after surgery, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a pituitary macroadenoma.

Despite transsphenoidal surgery and ketoconazole therapy, the patient suffered liver failure and died.

Among 20 CD reviewed cases in the literature, 65% were misdiagnosed. MRI and immunohistochemistry confirmed tumors, with 55% achieving remission post-surgery. Screening for CD before bariatric surgery may prevent mismanagement and complications.

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »