We Have Lost Another Cushie.

I don’t have permission yet to post any details but suffice it to say, losing even one Cushing’s patient is one too many.

We have a list of those that we know about here http://www.cushie.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=… and I’m sure that there are many more that we never hear about.

Cushing’s can be fatal.  

“Cushing’s disease is a rare disorder, with three to five cases per million people. It can affect all ages and both genders but is most common in otherwise healthy young women,” says Beverly M.K. Biller, MD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Neuroendocrine Unit, senior author of the study. “Often misdiagnosed, Cushing’s is associated with a broad range of health problems – causing physical changes, metabolic abnormalities and emotional difficulties – and if not controlled, significantly increases patients’ risk of dying much younger than expected.

 

If you think you have Cushing’s, please keep fighting as long as you need to to get help.  We don’t need any more names on the In Memory list!

Boston, Pituitary Day, 2012

On behalf of the Brain Science Foundation, the Department of Neurosurgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the BWH Pituitary/Neuroendocrine Center, you are invited to attend Pituitary Day. This program will take place on Saturday, March 24, 2012, from 7:45 AM to 5:00 PM at the Bornstein Amphitheater at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.

 

 Pituitary Day is a conference that unites patients, caregivers, family and friends with leading clinicians, researchers, nurses and other experts to discuss the latest in pituitary diagnosis and treatment. By way of a series of presentations and panel discussions, we will discuss basic and new information related to pituitary disorders, including physical and psychological aspects, and other important patient issues.

 

Our expectation is for this to be a truly remarkable and empowering experience and we hope you will consider joining us this year. For more information, please contact Sarah Donnelly at 781-239-2903 or sarah@brainsciencefoundation.org.

 

When

Saturday March 24, 2012 from 7:45 AM to 5:00 PM EDT

Where

Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Bornstein Amphitheater 

45 Francis Street

Boston, MA 02115 

Click to Register

 

 

Experimental drug reduces cortisol levels, improves symptoms in Cushing’s disease

International phase 3 trial is largest study ever of rare endocrine disorder

 

A new investigational drug significantly reduced urinary cortisol levels and improved symptoms of Cushing’s disease in the largest clinical study of this endocrine disorder ever conducted. Results of the clinical trial conducted at centers on four continents appear in the March 8 New England Journal of Medicine and show that treatment with pasireotide cut cortisol secretion an average of 50 percent and returned some patient’s levels to normal. 

“Cushing’s disease is a rare disorder, with three to five cases per million people. It can affect all ages and both genders but is most common in otherwise healthy young women,” says Beverly M.K. Biller, MD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Neuroendocrine Unit, senior author of the study. “Often misdiagnosed, Cushing’s is associated with a broad range of health problems – causing physical changes, metabolic abnormalities and emotional difficulties – and if not controlled, significantly increases patients’ risk of dying much younger than expected.”

One of several conditions that lead to Cushing’s syndrome – chronically elevated secretion of the hormone cortisol – Cushing’s disease is caused by a benign pituitary tumor that oversecretes the hormone ACTH, inducing increased cortisol secretion by the adrenal glands. Symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome include weight gain, hypertension, mood swings, irregular or absent periods, abnormalities of glucose processing – insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes – and cardiovascular disease. Since those symptoms are associated with many health problems, physicians may not consider the rare possibility of Cushing’s. The diagnosis can be difficult to make and usually requires the expertise of an endocrinologist. Since cortisol levels normally fluctuate during the day, a single blood test probably would not identify chronic elevation, so the most common diagnostic test measures a patient’s 24-hour urinary output. 

First-line treatment for Cushing’s disease is surgical removal of the ACTH-secreting tumor, which can lead to remission in 65 to 90 percent of patients who are treated by expert pituitary surgeons. But symptoms return in 10 to 30 percent of those patients, requiring repeat surgery, radiation therapy or treatment with drugs that interfere with part of the cortisol control system. Until last month, there was no specific FDA-approved medical treatment for Cushing’s syndrome; and while the newly approved drug mifepristone should benefit some patients, it does not affect the pituitary source of the condition or reduce cortisol levels. 

The current phase 3 trial of pasireotide – the first drug that blocks ACTH secretion by binding to somatostatin receptors on the pituitary tumor – was sponsored by Novartis Pharma and enrolled 162 patients at 62 sites in 18 countries. Almost 85 percent of participants had either persistent disease that had not responded to surgery or had recurrent disease. The other 15 percent were recently diagnosed but not appropriate candidates for surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups, one starting at two daily 600-microgram injections of pasireotide, the other receiving 900-microgram doses. Three months into the 12-month trial, participants whose urinary cortisol levels remained more than twice the normal range had their dosage levels increased. During the rest of the trial, dosage could be further increased, if necessary, or reduced if side effects occurred. 

At the end of the study period, many patients had a significant decrease in their urinary cortisol levels, with 33 achieving levels within normal range at their original dosage by month 6 of the trial. Participants whose baseline levels were less than five times the upper limit of normal were more likely to achieve normal levels than those with higher baseline levels, and the average urinary cortisol decrease across all participants was about 50 percent. Many Cushing’s disease symptoms decreased, and it became apparent within the first two months whether or not an individual was going to respond to pasireotide. 

Transient gastrointestinal discomfort, known to be associated with medications in the same family as pasireotide, was an expected side effect. But the investigators observed elevated glucose levels in 73 percent of participants, something not seen to the same extent with other medications in this family. That will require close attention, since many Cushing’s patients already have trouble metabolizing glucose. Biller explains, “Those patients who already were diabetic had the greatest increases in blood sugar, and those who were pre-diabetic were more likely to become diabetic than those who began with normal blood sugar. However, elevations were even see in those who started at normal glucose levels, so this is real and needs to be monitored carefully.” 

Additional trials of pasireotide are in the works, and a phase 3 study of a long-acting version of the drug was recently announced. Biller notes that the potential addition of pasireotide to available medical treatments for Cushing’s disease would have a number of advantages. “It’s very important to have medications that work at different parts of the cortisol control system – which is the case for the currently used medications that work at the adrenal gland level, pasireotide which works at the pituitary gland, and mifepristone which blocks the action of cortisol at receptors in the body. Having more options that work in different ways is valuable because not all patients respond to one medicine and some may be unable to tolerate a specific drug’s side effects. 

“As we have more drugs available to treat Cushing’s,” she adds. “I think in the long run we may start using combinations of drugs, which is the approach we use in some patients with acromegaly, another disorder in which a pituitary tumor causes excess hormone secretion. Ultimately we hope to be able to give lower doses leading to fewer overall side effects, but that remains to be determined by future studies.” Biller is a professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. 

Annamaria Colao, MD, PhD, University of Naples, Italy, is the lead author of the New England Journal report. Additional co-authors are Stephan Petersenn, MD, University of Duisberg-Essen, Germany; John Newell-Price, MD, PhD, University of Sheffield, U.K.; James Findling, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Feng Gu, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China; Mario Maldonado, MD, Ulrike Schoenherr, Dipl-Biol, and David Mills, MSc, Novartis Pharma; and Luiz Roberto Salgado, MD, University of São Paulo Medical School, Brazil. 

Massachusetts General Hospital, founded in 1811, is the original and largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. The MGH conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the United States, with an annual research budget of more than $750 million and major research centers in AIDS, cardiovascular research, cancer, computational and integrative biology, cutaneous biology, human genetics, medical imaging, neurodegenerative disorders, regenerative medicine, reproductive biology, systems biology, transplantation biology and photomedicine.

From http://www.massgeneral.org/about/pressrelease.aspx?id=1444#.T2I2Ue9AMtQ.facebook

Retroperitoneal Adrenal-Sparing Surgery for the Treatment of Cushing’s Syndrome Caused by Adrenocortical Adenoma: 8-Year Experience With 87 Patients

Hong-chao He, Jun Dai, Zhou-jun Shen, Yu Zhu, Fu-kang Sun, Yuan Shao, Rong-ming Zhang, Hao-fei Wang, Wen-bin Rui and Shan Zhong

 

Abstract

Background  

The objective of this study was to present our 8-year experience with partial adrenalectomy via the retroperitoneal approach for the treatment of Cushing’s adenoma.

Methods  

A total of 93 patients who underwent adrenal surgery for Cushing’s adenoma from March 2003 to December 2010 were enrolled in this study. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were reviewed from the database. Student’s t test was used to analyze the continuous data, and the χ2 test was used to analyze the categoric data. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results  

Adrenal-sparing surgery was performed in 87 cases (31 by open surgery, 56 by retroperitoneal laparoscopy). Six patients underwent open/laparoscopic total adrenalectomy because of recurrent disease or a large size. The cure rate in our series was 97.8%. Hypertension resolved in 34 of 64 patients (53.1%), diabetes in 7 of 27 patients (25.9%) and obesity in 28 of 48 patients (58.3%). One patient died during the postoperative period. The intraoperative complication rate for the open surgery group was significantly higher than that for the retroperitoneal laparoscopy group (9.1 vs. 1.7%).

Conclusions  

The retroperitoneal approach is reliable and safe for treating Cushing’s syndrome. The laparoscopic technique can decrease the prevalence of intraoperative complications. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy can be performed with extremely low morbidity and achieves an excellent outcome, although death may occur during the postoperative period in high-risk patients. Postoperative management plays an important role in the surgical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome.

 

Jun Dai is listed as co-first author.

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document

From http://www.springerlink.com/content/034754537j7586k2/

 

The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study (AVIS) for Identifying the Major Subtypes of Primary Aldosteronism

  1. Gian Paolo Rossi
  2. Marlena Barisa
  3. Bruno Allolio
  4. Richard J. Auchus
  5. Laurence Amar,
  6. Debbie Cohen
  7. Christoph Degenhart
  8. Jaap Deinum
  9. Evelyn Fischer
  10. Richard Gordon,
  11. Ralph Kickuth
  12. Gregory Kline
  13. Andre Lacroix
  14. Steven Magill
  15. Diego Miotto,
  16. Mitsuhide Naruse
  17. Tetsuo Nishikawa
  18. Masao Omura
  19. Eduardo Pimenta,
  20. Pierre-François Plouin
  21. Marcus Quinkler
  22. Martin Reincke
  23. Ermanno Rossi,
  24. Lars Christian Rump
  25. Fumitoshi Satoh
  26. Leo Schultze Kool
  27. Teresa Maria Seccia,
  28. Michael Stowasser
  29. Akiyo Tanabe
  30. Scott Trerotola
  31. Oliver Vonend
  32. Jiri Widimsky Jr.,
  33. Kwan-Dun Wu
  34. Vin-Cent Wu and 
  35. Achille Cesare Pessina

Author Affiliations


  1. University of Padova (G.P.R., M.B., T.M.S., A.C.P.), Department of Medicine (DIMED) Internal Medicine 4, Padova, 35128 Italy; University Hospital Würzburg (B.A.), Department of Internal Medicine I, Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Würzburg, 97080 Germany; University of Texas (R.J.A.), Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75390; Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (L.A., P.-F.P.), Hypertension Unit, Paris, 75908 France; Hospital of The University of Pennsylvania (D.C.), Department of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104; University Hospital Innenstadt (C.D.), Department of Clinical Radiology, Munich, 80336 Germany; Radboud University Nijmegen (J.D.), Department of Internal Medicine, Nijmegen, 6225GA Netherlands; University Hospital Innenstadt (E.F., M.R.), Department of Endocrinology, Munich, Germany; University of Queensland School of Medicine (R.G., E.P., M.S.), Greenslopes Hospital, Endocrine Hypertension Research Centre, Brisbane, 4120 Australia; University Hospital Würzburg (R.K.), Institute of Radiology, Würzburg, Germany; University of Calgary (G.K.), Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, T2N4J8 Canada; Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (A.L.), Department of Medicine, Montreal, H2W 1T8 Canada; Medical College of Wisconsin (S.M.), Endocrinology Clinic Community Memorial Medical Commons, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin 53051; University of Padova (D.M.), Department of Medicine (DIMED) Radiology, Padova, Italy; National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center (M.N.), Department of Endocrinology Clinical Research Institute, Kyoto, 612-8555 Japan; Yokohama Rosai Hospital (T.N., M.O.), Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Yokohama City, 222-0036 Japan; Clinical Endocrinology (M.Q.), Charité Campus Mitte, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, 10117 Germany; Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Nuova (E.R.), Department of Internal Medicine, Reggio Emilia, 42123 Italy; Department of Nephrology (L.C.R., O.V.), Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, 40225 Germany; Tohoku University Hospital (F.S.), Department of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Vascular Medicine, Sendai, 980-8574 Japan; Department of Radiology (L.S.K.), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Institute of Clinical Endocrinology (A.T.), Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, 162-8666 Japan; Hospital of The University of Pennsylvania (S.T.), Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Charles University in Prague (J.W.), General Faculty Hospital, Third Department of Medicine, Prague, 12808 Czech Republic; and National Taiwan University Hospital (K.-D.W., V.-C.W.), Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei, 10048 Taiwan
  1. Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Gian Paolo Rossi, M.D., FACC, FAHA, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital via Giustiniani, 2, 35126 Padova, Italy. E-mail: gianpaolo.rossi@unipd.it.

 

Abstract

Context: In patients who seek surgical cure of primary aldosteronism (PA), The Endocrine Society Guidelines recommend the use of adrenal vein sampling (AVS), which is invasive, technically challenging, difficult to interpret, and commonly held to be risky.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the complication rate of AVS and the ways in which it is performed and interpreted at major referral centers.

Design and Settings: The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study conducted at major referral centers for endocrine hypertension worldwide.

Participants: Eligible centers were identified from those that had published on PA and/or AVS in the last decade.

Main Outcome Measure: The protocols, interpretation, and costs of AVS were measured, as well as the rate of adrenal vein rupture and the rate of use of AVS.

Results: Twenty of 24 eligible centers from Asia, Australia, North America, and Europe participated and provided information on 2604 AVS studies over a 6-yr period. The percentage of PA patients systematically submitted to AVS was 77% (median; 19–100%, range). Thirteen of the 20 centers used sequential catheterization, and seven used bilaterally simultaneous catheterization; cosyntropin stimulation was used in 11 centers. The overall rate of adrenal vein rupture was 0.61%. It correlated directly with the number of AVS performed at a particular center (P = 0.002) and inversely with the number of AVS performed by each radiologist (P = 0.007).

Conclusions: Despite carrying a minimal risk of adrenal vein rupture and at variance with the guidelines, AVS is not used systematically at major referral centers worldwide. These findings represent an argument for defining guidelines for this clinically important but technically demanding procedure.

  • Received October 14, 2011.
  • Accepted January 31, 2012.

From http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/early/2012/03/01/jc.2011-2830.abstract?rss=1