Delirium Induced by Rapid Titration of Osilodrostat in a Patient With Cushing’s Disease

Abstract

Cushing’s disease frequently presents with psychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. Osilodrostat, an 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, is used for persistent or recurrent cases, but rapid titration may precipitate adrenal insufficiency and psychiatric complications.

We report a woman in her early 40s with a history of major depressive disorder treated with clomipramine. After transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease, she remained hypercortisolemic, and hydrocortisone replacement was continued postoperatively for safety due to unstable cortisol secretion. Cortisol secretion was unstable, with day-to-day fluctuations. Osilodrostat was initiated at 2 mg/day. Shortly thereafter, urinary free cortisol (UFC) increased, and between days 3 and 5, she developed depressive symptoms, depersonalization, and suicidal ideation. These were judged to be related to cortisol elevation, and osilodrostat was rapidly titrated, reaching 40 mg/day by day 9. Depressive symptoms improved as UFC decreased. However, from day 9, she developed delirium with fluctuating consciousness, disorientation, purposeless hyperactivity, and stereotyped speech, peaking on days 10-12. During this period, blood pressure decreased, accompanied by tachycardia and fever. Infection and metabolic abnormalities were clinically excluded. Symptoms resolved spontaneously by day 14, with amnesia for the episode, and she was discharged on day 20 without recurrence.

This case illustrates a rare clinical course where depressive symptoms during cortisol elevation and delirium during cortisol reduction occurred sequentially in the same patient following rapid osilodrostat titration. The episode suggests that abrupt cortisol fluctuations may induce psychiatric symptoms even under hydrocortisone supplementation. Clinicians should avoid rapid titration and ensure close collaboration between endocrinology and psychiatry when psychiatric symptoms arise during treatment.

Introduction

Cushing’s disease is caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secreting pituitary adenoma, leading to chronic hypercortisolism. In addition to physical features such as central obesity, moon face, and hypertension, psychiatric symptoms including depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment are frequently observed [1-3]. Depression occurs in 40-60% of patients and is associated with increased suicide risk. Anxiety and cognitive impairment are also common, and psychiatric symptoms may even precede the physical manifestations. Thus, psychiatrists may encounter such patients at an early stage, and it is clinically important to consider underlying endocrine disorders [1,3]. The first-line treatment is transsphenoidal surgery, but remission is not always achieved [4].

Osilodrostat, an oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, is primarily used for the treatment of persistent or recurrent Cushing’s disease. By inhibiting cortisol synthesis, it effectively lowers circulating cortisol levels, thereby improving the clinical manifestations of hypercortisolism. The phase III LINC 3 trial demonstrated its efficacy [5], but adverse events such as adrenal insufficiency and psychiatric symptoms have been reported [6-8]. Acute adrenal insufficiency can present with hypotension, tachycardia, fever, and gastrointestinal symptoms, and in severe cases with impaired consciousness or delirium [9]. To minimize these risks, gradual titration in 2-mg increments at intervals of at least two weeks is recommended [6].

For monitoring treatment efficacy, urinary free cortisol (UFC) is widely used as a reliable marker reflecting total cortisol secretion over 24 hours and serves as a standard index of disease activity and treatment response [1,2].

Case Presentation

The patient was a 43-year-old woman with a history of major depressive disorder since her early twenties, treated mainly with clomipramine. Although she experienced recurrent episodes, she was able to continue working as a clinical psychologist, with occasional sick leave. Her past history included papillary thyroid carcinoma treated surgically, followed by hypothyroidism managed with levothyroxine 75 µg/day.

In her thirties, she developed treatment-resistant hypertension. In March 2024, inferior petrosal sinus sampling confirmed Cushing’s disease. In April 2024, she underwent transsphenoidal surgery and started hydrocortisone replacement at 30 mg/day. However, hypercortisolism and elevated ACTH persisted. Cortisol levels showed marked day-to-day fluctuations rather than being consistently elevated, and replacement therapy was continued for safety.

In June 2024, she was admitted to our endocrinology department because of persistent disease activity. Psychiatry was consulted due to her psychiatric history. At admission, she was alert, cooperative, and exhibited neither depressive nor psychotic symptoms. Clomipramine was continued. Physical examination revealed a BMI of 27.5, central obesity, moon face, and violaceous striae. Blood pressure was 155/105 mmHg. Routine chemistry and thyroid function were within normal limits. Endocrinological work-up confirmed persistent hypercortisolism: the 24-hour UFC was markedly elevated (409.2 µg/day; normal < 50 µg/day), midnight serum cortisol was inappropriately high (14.3 µg/dL; normally suppressed at night), and dexamethasone suppression testing failed to suppress morning cortisol (9.7 µg/dL after 0.5 mg dexamethasone). Corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation testing demonstrated an exaggerated ACTH response (63.6 → 105.0 pg/mL), consistent with pituitary-dependent Cushing’s disease. Postoperative brain MRI showed only expected surgical changes without new lesions.

Figure 1 illustrates the clinical course in this case. Osilodrostat was initiated at 2 mg/day on day 1. UFC unexpectedly rose thereafter, and between days 3 and 5, she developed depressed mood, depersonalization, and suicidal ideation. These psychiatric symptoms were judged to be associated with increased cortisol secretion. Antidepressant adjustment was not attempted. Instead, priority was given to endocrine control, and osilodrostat was rapidly up-titrated. Although the risk of adrenal insufficiency was considered, treatment was deemed safe under hydrocortisone supplementation. By day 9, the dose of osilodrostat reached 40 mg/day, UFC decreased, and depressive symptoms improved.

Timeline-of-clinical-events-and-interventions-in-the-present-case.
Figure 1: Timeline of clinical events and interventions in the present case.

Panel (A) shows the osilodrostat dosage and 24-hour urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels; panel (B) depicts vital signs (sBP, systolic blood pressure; BT, body temperature); and panel (C) illustrates psychiatric symptoms and the dosages of antipsychotic medications, all plotted against treatment days.

However, from day 9 onward, delirium and psychomotor agitation emerged, peaking on days 10-12. She displayed fluctuating consciousness, global disorientation, impaired attention, purposeless hyperactivity, stereotyped behaviors, and repetitive utterances of meaningless numbers. She wandered barefoot and occasionally shouted fragmented phrases such as “Say you love me.” Anxiety and insomnia were prominent, but hallucinations and self-disturbances were absent.

At that time, her vital signs showed a decline in blood pressure from 155/105 mmHg to 125/59 mmHg, a pulse rate of 110/min, and a temperature of 38.3°C. Electrolytes and glucose were normal, and no inflammatory response or other signs of infection were detected. Because of marked psychomotor agitation, imaging and EEG were not performed. Risperidone and haloperidol were given but were ineffective.

At onset, the delirium was interpreted as a manifestation of hypercortisolism, partly because it occurred during a holiday when comprehensive evaluation was not feasible. Osilodrostat was therefore not reduced. As her symptoms improved spontaneously and she remained stable under hydrocortisone supplementation, the dose was maintained. Since the delirium resolved completely and did not recur, additional imaging or EEG was not performed.

By day 14, delirium had resolved, and the patient reported amnesia for the episode. No recurrence occurred, and she was discharged on day 20 at her and her family’s request. Outpatient follow-up confirmed stable status without recurrence of delirium.

Discussion

This case illustrates an unusual clinical course in which qualitatively distinct psychiatric symptoms appeared sequentially during rapid titration of osilodrostat. The initial depressive phase coincided with a transient rise in UFC and may have been related to unstable cortisol secretion that had already been observed prior to admission. Although not sufficient for a formal diagnosis, such variability is reminiscent of cyclical Cushing’s disease [10], which has also been associated with mood fluctuations [1,3]. Previous studies have demonstrated the link between hypercortisolism and depression [1,3], and our case is consistent with these findings during the early phase of treatment.

In contrast, the subsequent delirium phase was accompanied by hypotension, tachycardia, and fever, resembling adrenal insufficiency. Similar neuropsychiatric manifestations, including delirium and psychosis, have been described in previous reports of adrenal insufficiency [8,9]. However, unlike those cases, where symptoms typically emerged after drug withdrawal, delirium in our patient developed rapidly following dose escalation. This temporal pattern suggests that even transient cortisol reductions may precipitate acute neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Taken together, these observations both align with and extend prior findings linking cortisol dysregulation to psychiatric manifestations. Our case supports previous evidence that hypercortisolism is associated with depressive symptoms [1,3], whereas hypocortisolism predisposes to delirium or psychosis [8,9]. Importantly, it also highlights a dynamic aspect of this relationship: abrupt cortisol fluctuations themselves, regardless of direction, may transiently disrupt neuroendocrine homeostasis and trigger psychiatric symptoms. This interpretation is consistent with reports of cyclical Cushing’s disease showing alternating mood states [10], but it differs in that the fluctuation here was iatrogenic and temporally linked to rapid pharmacologic titration.

Pharmacological factors may have further amplified these effects. Clomipramine and antipsychotics such as haloperidol and risperidone are known to cause confusion or agitation, particularly under hormonal stress. It is therefore plausible that psychotropic drug interactions and cortisol fluctuations acted synergistically to produce the observed neuropsychiatric manifestations.

This report has several limitations. The onset of delirium occurred during a holiday, and severe agitation precluded blood sampling for serum cortisol, ACTH testing, or therapeutic steroid administration. Thus, strict diagnostic criteria for adrenal insufficiency could not be fulfilled. Nonetheless, the clinical presentation, with hypotension, tachycardia, fever, and altered consciousness, was consistent with an adrenal insufficiency-like state. Electrolytes, glucose, and inflammatory markers remained within normal limits, making infection or metabolic causes unlikely. However, structural or neurological contributors could not be completely excluded because imaging and EEG were not performed. Although the clinical picture resembled adrenal insufficiency, true adrenal crisis was unlikely given the normal electrolyte levels, spontaneous recovery, and maintained oral intake. Therefore, this episode may be better characterized as a state of functional adrenal dysregulation rather than frank adrenal insufficiency.

Conclusions

This case highlights a rare course in which depressive symptoms during cortisol elevation and delirium during cortisol reduction occurred sequentially in the same patient following rapid titration of osilodrostat. The episode suggests that even under hydrocortisone supplementation, abrupt cortisol fluctuations can induce psychiatric symptoms. However, because some observations were paradoxical and certain assessments could not be performed during the acute phase, these interpretations should be made with caution. The episode may represent a state of functional adrenal dysregulation rather than distinct phases of hyper- or hypocortisolism.

This case offers two clinical lessons. First, osilodrostat should be titrated gradually according to established guidelines. Second, if psychiatric symptoms arise during treatment, they are best managed through close collaboration between endocrinology and psychiatry.

References

  1. Pivonello R, Simeoli C, De Martino MC, et al.: Neuropsychiatric disorders in Cushing’s syndrome. Front Neurosci. 2015, 9:129. 10.3389/fnins.2015.00129
  2. Sharma ST, Nieman LK, Feelders RA: Cushing’s syndrome: epidemiology and developments in disease management. Clin Epidemiol. 2015, 7:281-93. 10.2147/CLEP.S44336
  3. Sonino N, Fava GA, Raffi AR, Boscaro M, Fallo F: Clinical correlates of major depression in Cushing’s disease. Psychopathology. 1998, 31:302-6. 10.1159/000029054
  4. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, et al.: Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9:847-75. 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7
  5. Pivonello R, Fleseriy M, Newell-Price J, et al.: Efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s disease (LINC 3): a multicentre phase 3 study with a double-blind, randomised withdrawal phase. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8:748-61. 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30240-0
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Osilodrostat prescribing information. (2020). Accessed: October 18, 2025: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/212801s000lbl.pdf.
  7. Gadelha M, Bex M, Feelders RA, et al.: Randomized trial of osilodrostat for the treatment of Cushing disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022, 107:e2882-95. 10.1210/clinem/dgac178
  8. Ekladios C, Khoury J, Mehr S, Feghali K: Osilodrostat-induced adrenal insufficiency in a patient with Cushing’s disease. Clin Case Rep. 2022, 10:e6607. 10.1002/ccr3.6607
  9. Arlt W: Society for Endocrinology endocrine emergency guidance: Emergency management of acute adrenal insufficiency (adrenal crisis) in adult patients. Endocr Connect. 2016, 5:G1-3. 10.1530/EC-16-0054
  10. Meinardi JR, Wolffenbuttel BH, Dullaart RP: Cyclic Cushing’s syndrome: a clinical challenge. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007, 157:245-54. 10.1530/EJE-07-0262

Related Factors of Delirium After Transsphenoidal Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection

Highlights

  • Aim to identify independent risk factors for postoperative delirium after pituitary adenoma surgery.
  • Select matched subjects by Propensity Score Matching to reduce potential biases caused by variables.
  • Enhance preoperative communication to minimize the occurrence of delirium, for patients at high risk of postoperative delirium.
  • Minimize surgery duration and general anesthesia, optimize perioperative sedation regimen.
  • Reducing unnecessary or excessive protective physical restraints.

Abstract

Objectives

The primary aim of this study is to explore the factors associated with delirium incidence in postoperative patients who have undergone endoscopic transsphenoidal approach surgery for pituitary adenoma.

Methods

The study population included patients admitted to Tianjin Huanhu Hospital’s Skull Base Endoscopy Center from January to December 2022, selected through a retrospective cohort study design. The presence of perioperative delirium was evaluated using the 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) scale, and the final diagnosis of delirium was determined by clinicians. Statistical analysis included Propensity Score Matching (PSM), χ2 Test, and Binary Logistic Regression.

Results

A total of 213 patients were included in this study, and the incidence of delirium was found to be 29.58 % (63/213). Among them, 126 patients were selected using PSM (delirium:non-delirium = 1:1), ensuring age, gender, and pathology were matched. According to the results of univariate analysis conducted on multiple variables, The binary logistic regression indicated that a history of alcoholism (OR = 6.89, [1.60–29.68], P = 0.010), preoperative optic nerve compression symptoms (OR = 4.30, [1.46–12.65], P = 0.008), operation time ≥3 h (OR = 5.50, [2.01–15.06], P = 0.001), benzodiazepines for sedation (OR = 3.94, [1.40–11.13], P = 0.010), sleep disorder (OR = 3.86, [1.40–10.66], P = 0.009), and physical restraint (OR = 4.53, [1.64–12.53], P = 0.004) as independent risk factors for postoperative delirium following pituitary adenoma surgery.

Conclusions

For pituitary adenoma patients with a history of alcoholism and presenting symptoms of optic nerve compression, as well as an operation time ≥3 h, enhancing communication between healthcare providers and patients, improving perioperative sleep quality, and reducing physical restraint may help decrease the incidence of postoperative delirium.

Introduction

In clinical practice, patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the postoperative period after endoscopic transsphenoidal tumorectomy of pituitary adenoma often experience episodes of delirium. According to a recent retrospective analysis conducted at a single center, the incidence of postoperative delirium among these patients was found to be 10.34 % (n = 360) [1]. Delirium is a common complication following neurosurgery, characterized by acute distraction, confusion in thinking, sleep disorders, and cognitive decline. The incidence of delirium in admitted patients after neurosurgery has been reported to be 19 %, with a range of 12 % to 26 % depending on clinical features and the methods used for delirium assessment [2], [3], [4]. The incidence of postoperative delirium varied across different types of neurosurgical diseases, as reported in a meta-analysis [2]. Specifically, the incidences were 8.0 % for patients with neurological tumors, 20 % for those undergoing functional neurosurgery, 24.0 % for microvascular decompression patients, 19.0 % for traumatic brain injury patients, 42.0 % for neurovascular patients, and 17.0 % for the mixed population undergoing neurosurgery procedures. Furthermore, the incidence rates of delirium in intensive care units (ICUs), general wards, or both combined were found to be 24.0 %, 17 %, and 18 %, respectively.

The aforementioned issue not only leads to prolonged hospital stays and increased healthcare costs, but also exerts a significant impact on patient consciousness and cognitive function. Therefore, early and accurate identification of delirium in post-neurosurgical patients is crucial. However, due to frequent co-occurrence with primary brain injury, related complications can also lead to cognitive impairment or even decreased levels of consciousness, posing challenges for timely and precise identification of delirium. Currently, the primary focus lies in the prevention of delirium within the neurosurgical ICU setting. Early identification and comprehensive pre-surgical assessment are positively significant measures for preventing postoperative delirium occurrence [5], [6]. In this study, a retrospective cohort design was employed to collect pertinent data and statistically analyze the incidence of delirium, as well as its associated influencing factors, among patients admitted to the neurosurgical ICU for pituitary adenoma treatment. And now it is reported as follows.

Section snippets

Patient selection

A retrospective cohort study design was employed to select 213 pituitary adenomas admitted to the Skull Base and Endoscopy Center of Tianjin Huanhu Hospital between January 2022 and December 2022 as the subjects for investigation, with a review of their medical records. The mean age was (50.03 ± 15.72) years, ranging from 20–79 years old (Fig. 1). Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their families, ensuring compliance with the requirements stated in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Inclusion criteria

a.

Propensity score matching

The present study enrolled a total of 213 patients with pituitary tumors, among whom 63 exhibited symptoms related to delirium while the remaining 150 did not. Consequently, the incidence rate of delirium was determined to be 29.58 % in this cohort of patients admitted to the intensive care unit following pituitary tumor surgery. The univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in age (≥65y old, 23.8 % vs. 23.3 %, P = 0.940) and gender (male, 49.2 % vs. 56.7 %, P = 0.318) between the

Background of perioperative delirium in transsphenoidal endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery

The pituitary gland is situated within the sella turcica and comprises two distinct components. The anterior pituitary, known as the adenohypophysis, functions as an endocrine organ responsible for secreting growth hormone, prolactin, adrenocorticotropic hormone, thyrotropin, follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. On the other hand, the posterior pituitary, referred to as the neurohypophysis, serves as a direct extension of the hypothalamus and acts as a storage site for

Conclusions

To enhance the evaluation of postoperative patients at risk of delirium, it is anticipated that optimizing doctor-nurse-patient communication and minimizing unnecessary and indiscriminate protective measures will mitigate the incidence of delirium following pituitary tumor surgery. This study is a single-center prospective study conducted at our institution, which has several inherent limitations. A large-scale multicenter prospective study is anticipated to further investigate the associated

Limitations

There are multiple factors that influence the occurrence of delirium following neurosurgery. This retrospective study solely focused on analyzing and comparing general patient data, medical history, and potential perioperative factors contributing to delirium, without considering any other known or unknown variables in this analysis. The pituitary gland functions as a neuroendocrine organ involved in the regulation of neuroendocrine processes. Changes in hormone levels following surgery for

Funding

All authors affirm that this study was conducted without any fund support from external organizations.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Shusheng Zhang: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Yanan Chen: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. Xiudong Wang: Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Jun Liu: Software, Formal analysis, Data curation. Yueda Chen: Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation. Guobin Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.