Cushing’s Syndrome Presenting as Non-Atherosclerotic Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure

Abstract

Cushing’s syndrome is a rare cause of myocardial infarction and heart failure. Herein, we report a female patient who presented acute myocardial infarction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The patient was found to have hypercortisolism secondary to adrenocortical adenoma and responded well to therapy. This case underlines the effects of hypercortisolism on the cardiovascular system. The clinical presentation of this patient is unique because non-atherosclerotic myocardial infarction is rarely reported in Cushing’s syndrome patients.

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome is an endocrine condition associated with excessive secretion of cortisol. Hypertension, vascular atherosclerosis, and chronic cardiac remodelling and dysfunction are commonly recognized cardiovascular complications in Cushing’s syndrome patients.1 Herein, we report a rare case of Cushing’s syndrome patient with a primary diagnosis of non-atherosclerotic myocardial infarction and heart failure (HF).

Case Report

A 61-year-old female with a past medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was admitted with sudden onset chest pain on 6 February 2018. Electrocardiogram showed ST-segment elevation in leads V3–V5. Blood biochemical results of 1 h after the onset of chest pain: cardiac troponin I (cTnI) 0.06 ug/L↑, creatine kinase (CK) 63 U/L, creatine phosphokinase-MB (CK-MB) 22 U/L, aspartate transferase (AST) 19 U/L, and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) 482 U/L. Myocardial injury markers were markedly elevated at the time point of 18 h after onset: cTnI 13.9 ug/L↑, CK 613 U/L↑, CK-MB 102 U/L↑, AST 112 U/L↑, and LDH 833 U/L↑. Due to the acute ECG changes and elevated myocardial injury markers, the patient was preliminarily diagnosed as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and underwent coronary angiography, which showed no stenosis, occlusion or dissection of coronary arteries (Figure 1). Echocardiography showed enlarged left atrial dimension (LAD, 55 mm) and left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVDd, 57 mm), and reduced ejection fraction (EF, 33%). The patient was treated for STEMI and HF, and was started on aspirin, statin, diuretic of furosemide and spirolactone, metoprolol, and Sacubitril/valsartan (SV, initiated June, 2020). The patient was strictly adherent to the medication prescribed (Table 1).

Details are in the caption following the image

Coronary angiogram demonstrating no significant obstruction in coronary artery circulation.
Table 1. Echocardiography results
2020-06-22 2020-09-02 2021-03-29 2021-06-02 2021-09-01 2021-10-22 2021-12-21
LAD (mm) 55 55 46 52 47 44 41
LVDd (mm) 57 57 53 55 54 51 55
IVS (mm) 10 10 11 10 10 10 11
LVPW (mm) 11 11 11 10 11 9 10
EF (%) 33 30 31 39 47 49 52.5
  • EF, ejection fraction; IVS, interventricular septum; LAD, left atrium dimension; LVDd, left ventricular end diastolic dimension; LVPW, left ventricular posterior wall.

However, the patient’s condition was not improved despite optimized medication. On 26 January 2021, the patient was re-admitted with recurrent chest distress and oedema, with new symptoms of facial plethora, centripetal obesity, and hyperglycaemia (Figure S1). Abdominal CT scan showed a right adrenal adenoma (Figure 2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed enlarged LVDd (62 mm), and reduced EF, with delayed myocardial enhancement and evidence of myocardial fibrosis and fatty deposits (Figure 3). Laboratory findings showed hypokalaemia: potassium 3.0 mmol/L, elevated serum cortisol level, low plasma ACTH level, and positive 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test. Based on the above findings, the patient was diagnosed with Cushing’s syndrome and started treatment with the glucocorticoid receptor inhibitor mifepristone on 5 February 2021.

Details are in the caption following the image

Abdominal CT scan showed adrenal adenoma at the right.

Details are in the caption following the image

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed enlarged LVDd, reduced EF, with delayed myocardial enhancement, evidence of myocardial fibrosis and fatty deposits.

With mifepristone added to the previous medical therapy (aspirin, statin, sacubitril/valsartan, metoprolol and diuretic of furosemide and spirolactone, and mifepristone), the patient’s condition and cardiac function improved, and echocardiography (21 December 2021) showed increased EF (52.5%). The patient underwent partial adrenalectomy on 22 December 2021. Postoperative pathology confirmed adrenal cortical adenoma. At last follow-up on 29 May 2023, the patient showed marked improvement in face and body shape, with no complaints of chest distress or oedema (Figure S2).

Discussion

In this case, the patient was first evaluated for STEMI due to her symptoms of chest pain, and the elevated ST-segment on ECG, along with the moderately elevated troponin I and other cardiac enzyme levels. However, coronary atherosclerotic heart disease was ruled out by the normal cardiac catheterization. We presume that a possible reason for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) might be vasospastic angina due to abnormal hormone levels with Cushing’s syndrome, leading to increased excessive myocardial metabolic demand and relative myocardial hypoxia, which eventually induced myocardial infarction. Although coronary atherosclerotic heart disease is the main cause of AMI, many non-atherosclerotic processes can lead to an imbalance between decreased coronary blood flow and increased myocardial metabolic demand. To date, non-atherosclerotic myocardial infarction has rarely been reported in Cushing’s syndrome patients. Vieira JT et al. reported that a patient with Cushing’s disease was considered to have spontaneous coronary artery dissection, which is a rare reason for AMI.2

Cushing’s syndrome is associated with an increased risk of cardiac failure,3 with both structural alterations and functional impairment. In our case, the patient’s CMR imaging showed typical features of cardiac geometry, function, and fibrosis, in accordance with previous reports.4 The underlying mechanisms may be the enhanced responsiveness to angiotensin II and activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor in direct response to cortisol excess.5

Our patient responded well to the therapy of conventional anti-HF medication of sacubitril/valsartan, metoprolol, and diuretic, once mifepristone was added. This favourable response to the pharmacological regimen supports the benefits of the agents for the normalization of excess cortisol. This case indicates that early diagnosis and effective treatment of Cushing’s syndrome may be crucial in preventing irreversible cardiac dysfunction secondary to cardiovascular events and heart failure.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81900409 and 82172182) and the PLA Youth Training Project for Medical Science (19QNP037).

Conflict of interest

The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

From https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.14548

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone-Dependent Cushing’s Syndrome Complicated With Gastric Ulcer Perforation in a 30-Year-Old Saudi Female

Abstract

Gastrointestinal perforation is a well-addressed complication of exogenous hypercortisolism; however, patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) do not usually experience this condition in clinical practice. The literature on this subject is limited and consists solely of clinical case reports/series with only 23 instances of gastrointestinal perforation occurring in individuals with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome. This is mainly attributed to the rarity of Cushing’s syndrome itself and the low chance of occurrence of such complications.

We report a case of a recently diagnosed adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent Cushing’s syndrome in a 30-years-old female who presented initially with a three-month history of progressive weight gain, generalized weakness, acne, menstrual irregularity, and severe hypokalemia, and then developed a gastric ulcer perforation only one month after her ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome diagnosis and was managed through emergent surgery.

Introduction

A disorder of the endocrine system characterized by excessive cortisol production, known as Cushing’s syndrome, rarely occurs. The main causes are pituitary tumors, ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting tumors, or adrenal tumors that secrete cortisol independently [1]. Patients initially present with a wide range of symptoms, including weight gain, proximal myopathy, skin thinning, and abdominal striae [1]. Additionally, several metabolic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, can occur, especially when the diagnosis is not established at an early stage [2]. There is a possibility of gastrointestinal complications among patients receiving exogenous glucocorticoids. However, there is limited information on gastrointestinal complications associated with endogenous hypercortisolemia [3,4]. Thus far, only 23 instances have been published addressing the co-occurrence of gastrointestinal perforation with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome [5-17]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reporting gastric perforation in an ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, while the vast majority reported diverticular, sigmoid, or duodenal perforation with Cushing’s syndrome [5-17]. Herein, we describe the medical history, physical examination, and investigatory findings of a 30-year-old female with a recent diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome that was complicated by gastric ulcer perforation, necessitating an urgent exploratory laparotomy. The primary motivator of this case report was the rarity of the described condition, the atypical location of the perforation in such patient group, and the relatively young age of the patient.

Case Presentation

History and examination

A 30-year-old female with a history of mental retardation was admitted to our emergency department (ER) with progressive weakness and fatigue. Upon taking the history, she had been having menstrual irregularities, progressive weight gain, and generalized weakness, which was significant enough to limit her physical activity and hinder her movement for the past three months. Initial vital signs showed that the patient had a body temperature of 37°C, a pulse rate of 90 beats per minute, and a blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg. On physical examination, the patient had a moon face with supraclavicular fullness, dorsocervical fat pad, purple abdominal striae, facial signs of hirsutism, and acne all over the face, shoulders, chest, and back.

Investigations

In the initial laboratory examination, hypokalemia of 2.1 mEq/L, hyperglycemia of 12.1 mmol/L, and metabolic alkalosis were detected (Table 1). The cortisol level after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test was 2204 nmol/L (normal range 140-690), ACTH 123 pg/mL (normal range 7.2-63.3), DHEA-S 27.85 umol/L (normal range 2.6-13.9), And 24-hour urine cortisol level was 1560 mg/day (normal range 30-350) (Table 1). No suppression was observed in cortisol level with 8 mg dexamethasone suppression test.

Parameter Initial presentation Perforation presentation Refrence range
Na+ 143 mEq/L 139 mmol/L 135-147 mEq/L
Cl- 85 mEq/L 105 mmol/L 98-108 mEq/L
K+ 2.1 mEq/L 2.8 mmol/L 3.5-5.0 mEq/L
Mg2+ 0.79 mmol/L 0.77 mmol/L 0.85-1.110 mmol/L
PO3- 0.88 mmol/L 1.23 mmol/L 0.97-1.46 mmol/L
PH 7.54 7.36 7.35-7.45
PCO2 67.5 mmHg 42.7 mmHg 35-45 mmHg
PO2 27.7 mmHg 62.2 mmHg 75-100 mmHg
HCO3 49.8 mEq/L 23.6 mEq/L 22-26 mEq/L
Random blood glucose 12.1 mmol/L 24.1 mmol/L <5.5 mmol/L
Hemoglobin 13.5 g/dL 14.9 g/dL 13.7-16.8 g/dL
White blood cells 9,720 /uL 11,100 /uL 3,300-8,600 /uL
Lymphocyte 0.48% 0.33%
Neutrophil 8.55% 9.66%
Eosinophil 0.0% 0.0%
TSH 0.55 mIU/L Was not ordered 0.4-4.0 mIU/L
Cortisol 2204 nmol/L 4842 nmol/L 140-690 nmol/L
ACTH 123 pg/mL Was not ordered 7.2-63.3 pg/mL
Table 1: Laboratory findings on initial presentation and on perforation day

TSH – thyroid stimulating hormone; ACTH – adrenocorticotropic hormone

A series of CT scans for the neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed and failed to localize any tumors acting as an ectopic source. A pituitary MRI was performed, and no adenoma was found. To complete the diagnostic workup, we decided to do an inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) and PET scan with Gallium 68; however, the patient’s family refused and requested discharge and outpatient follow-ups. These results, together with the biochemical and clinical findings, supported the diagnostic hypothesis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome.

Treatment/management

When addressing the issue of hypokalemia that the patient presented with initially, it was found to be resistant and difficult to correct. The patient was put on spironolactone 50 mg BID, and potassium chloride 20 mEq q8h, and her potassium level barely reached 3.5 mmol/L after several days. In addition, her magnesium level was corrected with magnesium oxide 800 mg every six hours. Her blood glucose level was controlled with insulin glargine 6 units daily and Novorapid as per the sliding scale. The patient was discharged on spironolactone tablets 50 mg BID (oral), potassium chloride 20 mEq q8h, cholecalciferol, calcium carbonate, insulin glargine 6 units daily, and Novorapid 4 units TID before meals.

Follow-up and outcomes

Seven days after discharge, she presented to the ER complaining of a new onset of abdominal pain, constipation, and reduced urine output. Her Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 15, her blood pressure measurement was 146/90 mmHg, her pulse rate was 66 beats per minute, her respiratory rate was 21 breaths per minute, and her temperature was 36.7°C. Upon physical examination, the patient had distended non-tender abdomen without any other significant findings. Blood work was done, including renal functions, and all parameters, including potassium, were within normal limits. A chest X-ray was also performed and revealed no evidence of pneumoperitoneum. The patient was clinically stable after managing her abdominal pain with acetaminophen injection and administering fleet enema for constipation. After instructions on when to come again to the ER were given, the patient was discharged home on lactulose and paracetamol, and a close outpatient follow-up appointment was scheduled.

Five days after the ER visit, the patient presented again to the ER. She was still complaining of severe non-resolving abdominal pain, constipation, and reduced urine output. Upon physical examination in the ER, the patient was found to have developed a new onset of lower limb edema, abdominal rebound tenderness, and abdominal rigidity and guarding. She was hypotensive with a blood pressure of 91/46 mmHg, pulse rate of 80 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, temperature of 38.2 °C, and SpO2 of 96%. The only significant laboratory finding was her potassium level dropping low to 2.8 mEq/L (Table 1). An X-ray of the chest was requested and showed a large pneumoperitoneum (Figure 1).

Posteroanterior-chest-X-ray-at-the-time-of-gastric-perforation-displaying-severe-air-under-the-diaphragm-with-bilateral-obstruction-indicating-massive-pneumoperitoneum-(red-arrow)
Figure 1: Posteroanterior chest X-ray at the time of gastric perforation displaying severe air under the diaphragm with bilateral obstruction indicating massive pneumoperitoneum (red arrow)

Abdominal CT was also urgently performed and confirmed the presence of gastric perforation likely related to an underlying perforated peptic ulcer with 0.8 cm defect at the distal greater curvature (Figures 23).

Coronal-section-CT-image-of-abdomen-and-pelvis-at-the-time-of-gastric-perforation-showing-features-of-gastric-perforation-likely-related-to-the-underlying-perforated-peptic-ulcer-with-0.8-cm-defect-at-the-distal-greater-curvature-
Figure 2: Coronal-section CT image of abdomen and pelvis at the time of gastric perforation showing features of gastric perforation likely related to the underlying perforated peptic ulcer with 0.8 cm defect at the distal greater curvature
Horizontal-section-CT-image-showing-features-of-gastric-perforation-likely-related-to-the-underlying-perforated-peptic-ulcer-with-0.8-cm-defect-at-the-distal-greater-curvature
Figure 3: Horizontal-section CT image showing features of gastric perforation likely related to the underlying perforated peptic ulcer with 0.8 cm defect at the distal greater curvature

The patient underwent an emergent gastric wedge resection for gastric perforation, and the pathology reported evidence of gastric ulcer with no evidence of malignancy. Furthermore, Helicobacter pylori test was performed on the sample, and it came back positive. The patient tolerated the surgery very well, and postoperative recovery was without any complications.

Later, the patient was prescribed metyrapone 250 mg Q4h, which was then increased to 500 mg Q4h four days after surgery, and her cortisol level significantly dropped to 634nmol/L. During that time, a gastrin level test was also performed to exclude the presence of gastrinomas, and the level was 45 pg/ml (normal range 13-115).

Discussion

A small percentage of the population suffers from Cushing’s syndrome, which is an endocrine disorder characterized by an endogenous overproduction of glucocorticoids, resulting in hypercortisolemia [1]. It is estimated to affect 0.7 to 2.4 people per million annually [1]. Hypercortisolemia alters psychologic, metabolic, and cardiovascular functions, resulting in increased mortality and morbidity rates, particularly if the diagnosis is delayed and long-term exposure to high cortisol levels occurs [2]. Women are more likely to suffer from this condition than men, and people in their 40s to 60s are most vulnerable to it [1]. Patients initially present with a wide range of symptoms, including weight gain, proximal myopathy, skin thinning, and abdominal striae [1]. Additionally, several metabolic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, can occur [1]. Due to the rarity of this condition, there is often a significant delay in diagnosis and treatment, which could eventually lead to complications from prolonged hypercortisolism.

From another standpoint, in a systematic review, the incidence of peptic ulcer perforation ranges from 3.8 to 14 per 100,000 individuals in the general population [18]. In under-developed countries, patients are typically young, tobacco-using males [19]. However, patients in industrialized countries are typically older with multiple co-morbidities and are on long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or steroid use [19]. Patients may present with an abrupt onset of abdominal discomfort, abdominal rigidity, and tachycardia in the early stages of a perforated peptic ulcer [19]. Later, abdominal distention, pyrexia, hypotension, fever, and vomiting can occur [19]. Furthermore, when the diagnosis is made early, a perforated ulcer often has a good prognosis. However, the risk of adverse events increases if there is a delay in the diagnosis [20]. Therefore, making an early detection through different imaging modalities is crucial [20]. A history of peptic ulcer disease, NSAIDs, physiological stress, smoking, corticosteroids, and Helicobacter pylori are some of the well-established risk factors for a perforated peptic ulcer [20].

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori among Saudi patients is high; in one study, the overall prevalence was 46.5% in patients with dyspepsia using gastric biopsy [21]. Several studies have explored the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal perforation, but the results have been mixed. Some studies have suggested a higher prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among individuals with gastrointestinal perforation compared to those without, indicating a potential association. However, other studies have found no significant difference in the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection between perforated and non-perforated gastrointestinal ulcer cases [22]. Furthermore, they suggested that the presence of other risk factors like the use of NSAIDs, smoking, and alcohol may interact with Helicobacter pylori infection and contribute to the development of complications such as gastrointestinal perforation [22]. However, in our case, the patient did not have any established risk factors for gastric perforation, such as NSAIDs, smoking, or alcohol. Therefore, considering the low incidence of gastrointestinal perforation and high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori, the conflicting data regarding the association between Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal perforation, and the lack of established risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation in our patient, we suggest that prolonged excess glucocorticoids from Cushing’s syndrome may have contributed to the gastric perforation either independently or synergistically with Helicobacter pylori since hypercortisolism can lead to a weakened gastrointestinal wall integrity due to decreased collagen turnover and disruption of mucosal protection by prostacyclin [15]. In addition, because of hypercortisolism, perforation may not be contained or healed initially due to the immunosuppressive effects of hypercortisolism, whether endogenous or exogenous [15]. Additionally, high levels of cortisol may delay the diagnosis and treatment since it may mask the symptoms of the perforation [14]. Moreover, our patient was treated for severe hypokalemia with potassium supplementation for an extended period of time. Previous studies have linked potassium chloride supplementation to gastrointestinal ulceration and perforation, making this a possible additive cause of our patient’s condition [23,24].

A limited number of studies have addressed gastrointestinal perforations associated with endogenous hypercortisolemia [5-17]. The correlation between Cushing’s syndrome and gastrointestinal perforation is highlighted in our study and in the case reports that have been previously published (Table 2). Similar to our case, a female predominance was seen in gastrointestinal perforation among the reported cases of Cushing’s syndrome [6,7,12,13,15,16]. Additionally, the average age at which gastrointestinal perforation occurred in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism ranged from 45 to 80, which is a noticeably higher age range than the case we are presenting here (aged 30) [6-10,12]. Furthermore, unlike our case, in which gastrointestinal perforation occurred four months after the onset of Cushing’s symptoms, Intestinal perforation occurs approximately 9.8 months after Cushing’s symptoms first appear [15]. Furthermore, in our patient, gastric perforation occurred while she was hypercortisolemic and not in a remission state. Hence, in association with Helicobacter pylori infection, severe hypercortisolemia could have been a secondary contributing factor to gastric perforation. The complications of gastric ulceration, specifically with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome, have been addressed in two case reports [25,26]. It must be noted, however, that neither case is similar to ours. A case of gastric perforation was reported by Kubicka et al. in a patient who had a confirmed diagnosis of gastrinoma, and the patient was diagnosed with ectopic Cushing’s syndrome seven months after gastric perforation [25]. Therefore, since ectopic Cushing’s syndrome was diagnosed seven months after the perforation, it is more likely that the gastrinoma contributed to this complication. In contrast, our patient’s serum gastrin level was within the normal range, ruling out gastrinoma. Further, Hoshino et al. reported a case of gastrointestinal bleeding in a 39-year-old man with a confirmed diagnosis of Cushing’s disease secondary to pituitary adenoma [26]. He was found to have gastric ulceration and bleeding along with Helicobacter pylori infection and elevated cortisol levels [26]. In spite of the patient not developing a gastric perforation, it was suggested by the author that hypercortisolism might be a contributing factor for gastric ulcer complications by slowing down the ulcer healing process [26]

Reference Year of publication Age, gender Highest cortisol level plasma cortisol (PC, nmol/L) / UFC (nmol/L) Cause of Cushing’s syndrome Time from onset of Cushing’s symptoms to perforation (months) Reported site of gastrointestinal perforation
Current 2023 30, Female PC 4842 ACTH-dependant 4 Gastric perforation
Ishinoda et al. [17] 2023 24, Male PC 1647 Cushing’s disease 12 Sigmoid colon perforation
Wijewickrama et al. [16] 2021 32, Female PC 1147 Pituitary microadenoma 1 Diverticular perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 72, Female UFC 5296 Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor 12 Diverticular perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 61, Female PC 1925 Metastatic medullary carcinoma of thyroid 12 Sigmoid colon and diverticular perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 68, Female UFC 410 Cushing’s disease 12 Sigmoid colon perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 71, Female UFC 1533 Cushing’s disease 4 Diverticular perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 54, Male UFC 374 Cushing’s disease 3 Sigmoid colon perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 52, Female UFC 885 Cushing’s disease 16 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 80, Female UFC 5601 Lung carcinoid 36 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 60, Female UFC 72726 Metastatic islet cell carcinoma 36 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 31, Male UFC 1297 Cushing’s disease 20 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 52, Female UFC 2371 Lung carcinoid 4 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 67, Male UFC 3836 Ectopic ACTH 10 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 51, Male UFC 13552 Metastatic thymic carcinoma 4 Diverticular perforation
Kaya et al. [9] 2016 70, Male PC 1432 Small cell lung cancer 1 Diverticular perforation
Dacruz et al. [12] 2016 60, Female UFC 4481 Metastatic parotid tumor 5 Sigmoid colon and diverticular perforation
Matheny et al. [10] 2016 67, Male UFC 11119 Metastatic medullary carcinoma of thyroid 4 Diverticular perforation
Flynn et al. [13]   2016 63, Female UFC 12465 Pheochromocytoma 1 Perforation at the splenic flexure
Balestrieri et al. [11] 2016 75, Male PC 2272 Neuroendocrine tumor 1 Intestinal perforation
Hara et al, [8] 2013 79, Male PC 1230 Cushing’s disease 6 Diverticular perforation
De Havenon et al. [7] 2011 71, Female PC 2593 Cushing’s disease 9 Diverticular perforation
Lutgers et al. [6] 2010 55, Female UFC 10152 Right pheochromocytoma 1 Sigmoid colon and diverticular perforation
Drake et al. [5] 1998 35, Male PC 1442 Islet cell tumor 4 Duodenal perforation and rupture of pancreatic pseudocyst
Table 2: Current case and previous reported 23 cases of patients with Cushing’s syndrome and gastrointestinal perforation

UFC – urinary free cortisol; PC – plasma cortisol; ACTH – adrenocorticotropic hormone

Conclusions

A high blood cortisol level can be associated with various clinical manifestations and diverse sets of complications. This case report sheds light on one of the less common complications of hypercortisolism in patients with Cushing’s syndrome, which is gastrointestinal perforation. Our report further supports the published evidence that gastrointestinal perforation is a rare but potentially fatal complication among patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Moreover, it highlights the possibility of developing gastric perforations in this patient group, even at younger ages than expected. This should elicit a high clinical suspicion and demand prompt investigation of Cushing’s syndrome patients in a hypercortisolism state presenting with modest gastrointestinal symptoms.

References

  1. Pivonello R, De Martino MC, De Leo M, Lombardi G, Colao A: Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008, 37:135-49. 10.1016/j.ecl.2007.10.010
  2. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK: Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2006, 367:1605-17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68699-6
  3. Goethals L, Nieboer K, De Smet K, De Geeter E, Tabrizi NH, Van Eetvelde E, de Mey J: Cortisone associated diverticular perforation. JBR-BTR. 2011, 94:348-9. 10.5334/jbr-btr.705
  4. Piekarek K, Israelsson LA: Perforated colonic diverticular disease: the importance of NSAIDs, opioids, corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008, 23:1193-7. 10.1007/s00384-008-0555-4
  5. Drake WM, Perry LA, Hinds CJ, Lowe DG, Reznek RH, Besser GM: Emergency and prolonged use of intravenous etomidate to control hypercortisolemia in a patient with Cushing’s syndrome and peritonitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998, 83:3542-4. 10.1210/jcem.83.10.5156
  6. Lutgers HL, Vergragt J, Dong PV, de Vries J, Dullaart RP, van den Berg G, Ligtenberg JJ: Severe hypercortisolism: a medical emergency requiring urgent intervention. Crit Care Med. 2010, 38:1598-601. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e47b7a
  7. de Havenon A, Ehrenkranz J: A perforated diverticulum in Cushing’s disease. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2011, 2:215-7. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2011.06.009
  8. Hara T, Akutsu H, Yamamoto T, Ishikawa E, Matsuda M, Matsumura A: Cushing’s disease presenting with gastrointestinal perforation: a case report. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2013, 2013:130064. 10.1530/EDM-13-0064
  9. Kaya T, Karacaer C, Açikgöz SB, Aydemir Y, Tamer A: Severe hypokalaemia, hypertension, and intestinal perforation in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016, 10:OD09-11. 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17198.7127
  10. Matheny LN, Wilson JR, Baum HB: Ectopic ACTH production leading to diagnosis of underlying medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2016, 4:2324709616643989. 10.1177/2324709616643989
  11. Balestrieri A, Magnani E, Nuzzo F: Unusual Cushing’s syndrome and hypercalcitoninaemia due to a small cell prostate carcinoma. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2016, 2016:6308058. 10.1155/2016/6308058
  12. Dacruz T, Kalhan A, Rashid M, Obuobie K: An ectopic ACTH secreting metastatic parotid tumour. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2016, 2016:4852907. 10.1155/2016/4852907
  13. Flynn E, Baqar S, Liu D, et al.: Bowel perforation complicating an ACTH-secreting phaeochromocytoma. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2016, 2016:10.1530/EDM-16-0061
  14. Sater ZA, Jha S, McGlotten R, Hartley I, El Lakis M, Araque KA, Nieman LK: Diverticular perforation: A fatal complication to forestall in Cushing syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018, 103:2811-4. 10.1210/jc.2018-00829
  15. Shahidi M, Phillips RA, Chik CL: Intestinal perforation in ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Biomed Res Int. 2019, 2019:9721781. 10.1155/2019/9721781
  16. Wijewickrama PS, Ratnasamy V, Somasundaram NP, Sumanatilleke M, Ambawatte SB: A challenging case of Cushing’s disease complicated with multiple thrombotic phenomena following trans-sphenoidal surgery; a case report. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021, 21:29. 10.1186/s12902-021-00701-0
  17. Ishinoda Y, Uto A, Meshino H, et al.: Bowel perforation associated with Cushing’s disease: a case report with literature review. Endocr J. 2023, 70:933-9. 10.1507/endocrj.EJ23-0110
  18. Lau JY, Sung J, Hill C, Henderson C, Howden CW, Metz DC: Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion. 2011, 84:102-13. 10.1159/000323958
  19. Chung KT, Shelat VG: Perforated peptic ulcer – an update. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017, 9:1-12. 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.1
  20. Weledji EP: An overview of gastroduodenal perforation. Front Surg. 2020, 7:573901. 10.3389/fsurg.2020.573901
  21. Akeel M, Elmakki E, Shehata A, Elhafey A, Aboshouk T, Ageely H, Mahfouz MS: Prevalence and factors associated with H. pylori infection in Saudi patients with dyspepsia. Electron Physician. 2018, 10:7279-86. 10.19082/7279
  22. Thirupathaiah K, Jayapal L, Amaranathan A, Vijayakumar C, Goneppanavar M, Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah VP: The association between Helicobacter pylori and perforated gastroduodenal ulcer. Cureus. 2020, 12:e7406. 10.7759/cureus.7406
  23. Farquharson-Roberts MA, Giddings AE, Nunn AJ: Perforation of small bowel due to slow release potassium chloride (slow-K). Br Med J. 1975, 3:206. 10.1136/bmj.3.5977.206
  24. Payan H, Blaustein A: Potassium chloride and small bowel perforation. Gastroenterology. 1965, 48:877-8. 10.1016/S0016-5085(65)80073-7
  25. Kubicka E, Zawadzka K, Syrycka J, Kałużny M, Pawluś A, Bolanowski M: A case of gastrinoma associated with ectopic Cushing syndrome. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020, 130:328-9. 10.20452/pamw.15201
  26. Hoshino C, Satoh N, Narita M, Kikuchi A, Inoue M: Another ‘Cushing ulcer’. BMJ Case Rep. 2011, 2011:10.1136/bcr.02.2011.3888

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/196132-adrenocorticotropic-hormone-dependent-cushings-syndrome-complicated-with-gastric-ulcer-perforation-in-a-30-year-old-saudi-female-a-case-report-and-a-review-of-the-literature#!/

Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Treatment Outcomes of Cushing’s Disease In Children: a Multicenter Study

Abstract

Objective

Since Cushing’s disease (CD) is less common in the paediatric age group than in adults, data on this subject are relatively limited in children. Herein, we aim to share the clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic features of paediatric CD cases.

Design

National, multicenter and retrospective study.

Patients

All centres were asked to complete a form including questions regarding initial complaints, physical examination findings, diagnostic tests, treatment modalities and follow-up data of the children with CD between December 2015 and March 2017.

Measurements

Diagnostic tests of CD and tumour size.

Results

Thirty-four patients (M:F = 16:18) from 15 tertiary centres were enroled. The most frequent complaint and physical examination finding were rapid weight gain, and round face with plethora, respectively. Late-night serum cortisol level was the most sensitive test for the diagnosis of hypercortisolism and morning adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level to demonstrate the pituitary origin (100% and 96.8%, respectively). Adenoma was detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 70.5% of the patients. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA) was the most preferred treatment (78.1%). At follow-up, 6 (24%) of the patients who underwent TSA were reoperated due to recurrence or surgical failure.

Conclusions

Herein, national data of the clinical experience on paediatric CD have been presented. Our findings highlight that presenting complaints may be subtle in children, the sensitivities of the diagnostic tests are very variable and require a careful interpretation, and MRI fails to detect adenoma in approximately one-third of cases. Finally, clinicians should be aware of the recurrence of the disease during the follow-up after surgery.

From https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cen.14980