High-resolution Contrast-enhanced MRI With Three-Dimensional Fast Spin Echo Improved the Diagnostic Performance for Identifying Pituitary Microadenomas In Cushing’s Syndrome

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the diagnostic performance of high-resolution contrast-enhanced MRI (hrMRI) with three-dimensional (3D) fast spin echo (FSE) sequence by comparison with conventional contrast-enhanced MRI (cMRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (dMRI) with 2D FSE sequence for identifying pituitary microadenomas.

Methods

This single-institutional retrospective study included 69 consecutive patients with Cushing’s syndrome who underwent preoperative pituitary MRI, including cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI, between January 2016 to December 2020. Reference standards were established by using all available imaging, clinical, surgical, and pathological resources. The diagnostic performance of cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI for identifying pituitary microadenomas was independently evaluated by two experienced neuroradiologists. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) were compared between protocols for each reader by using the DeLong test to assess the diagnostic performance for identifying pituitary microadenomas. The inter-observer agreement was assessed by using the κ analysis.

Results

The diagnostic performance of hrMRI (AUC, 0.95–0.97) was higher than cMRI (AUC, 0.74–0.75; p ≤ .002) and dMRI (AUC, 0.59–0.68; p ≤ .001) for identifying pituitary microadenomas. The sensitivity and specificity of hrMRI were 90–93% and 100%, respectively. There were 78% (18/23) to 82% (14/17) of the patients, who were misdiagnosed on cMRI and dMRI and correctly diagnosed on hrMRI. The inter-observer agreement for identifying pituitary microadenomas was moderate on cMRI (κ = 0.50), moderate on dMRI (κ = 0.57), and almost perfect on hrMRI (κ = 0.91), respectively.

Conclusions

The hrMRI showed higher diagnostic performance than cMRI and dMRI for identifying pituitary microadenomas in patients with Cushing’s syndrome.

Key Points

• The diagnostic performance of hrMRI was higher than cMRI and dMRI for identifying pituitary microadenomas in Cushing’s syndrome.

• About 80% of patients, who were misdiagnosed on cMRI and dMRI, were correctly diagnosed on hrMRI.

• The inter-observer agreement for identifying pituitary microadenomas was almost perfect on hrMRI.

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome, caused by excessive exposure to glucocorticoids, is associated with considerable morbidity and increased mortality [1]. Cushing’s syndrome has diverse manifestations, including central obesity, moon facies, purple striae, and hypertension [2]. Cushing’s disease, due to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) hypersecretion from pituitary adenomas, is the most common etiology of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome [12]. According to the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, transsphenoidal surgery is the first-line treatment for Cushing’s disease [3]. The identification of pituitary adenomas on preoperative MRI can significantly increase the postoperative remission rate from 50 to 98% [4]. Therefore, it is critical to identify pituitary adenomas on MRI before surgery.

However, there are considerable challenges in identifying ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas. This is because about 90% of the tumors are microadenomas (less than 10 mm in size) and the median diameter at surgery is about 5 mm [56]. Conventional contrast-enhanced MRI (cMRI) using a two-dimensional (2D) fast spin echo (FSE) sequence has been routinely used to acquire images with 2- to 3-mm slice thickness, but some microadenomas are difficult to be identified on cMRI, resulting in false negatives reported in up to 50% of patients with Cushing’s disease [7]. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (dMRI) increases the sensitivity of identifying pituitary adenomas to 66% [8], but it also increases false positives at the same time [910]. The 3D spoiled gradient recalled (SPGR) sequence has been introduced in high-resolution contrast-enhanced MRI (hrMRI) to acquire images with 1- to 1.2-mm slice thickness. It is reported that the 3D SPGR sequence is superior to the 2D FSE sequence in the identification of pituitary adenomas with a sensitivity of up to 80% [11,12,13], but it cannot satisfy the clinical needs that about 20% of the lesions are still missed. Therefore, techniques are needed that can help better identify pituitary adenomas, particularly microadenomas. Previously, the 3D FSE sequence was recommended in patients with hyperprolactinemia [14]. Recently, the 3D FSE sequence has developed rapidly and can provide superior image quality with diminished artifacts [15]. Sartoretti et al demonstrated in a very effective fashion that the 3D FSE sequence is a reliable alternative for pituitary imaging in terms of image quality [16]. However, to our knowledge, few studies have investigated the diagnostic performance of 3D FSE sequences for identifying ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas, particularly microadenomas.

The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of hrMRI with 3D FSE sequence by comparison with cMRI and dMRI with 2D FSE sequence for identifying ACTH-secreting pituitary microadenomas in patients with Cushing’s syndrome.

Materials and methods

This single-institutional retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Study participants

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of 186 consecutive patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, who underwent a combined protocol of cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI from January 2016 to December 2020. Postoperative patients with Cushing’s disease (n = 97), patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome who underwent pituitary exploration (n = 2), and patients with macroadenomas (n = 5) or lack of pathology (n = 13) were excluded from the study. Finally, 69 patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome were included in the current study (Fig. 1) and the patients included were all surgically confirmed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of patient inclusion/exclusion process and image analysis. ACTH adrenocorticotropic hormone, CD Cushing’s disease, EAS ectopic ACTH syndrome, T1WI T1-weighted imaging, T2WI T2-weighted imaging

MRI protocol

All the patients were imaged on a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner (Discovery MR750w, GE Healthcare) using an 8-channel head coil. The MRI protocol included coronal T2-weighted imaging, coronal T1-weighted imaging, and sagittal T1-weighted imaging before contrast injection. After contrast injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) at 0.05 mmol/kg (0.1 mL/kg) with a flow rate of 2 mL/s followed by a 10-mL saline solution flush, dMRI and cMRI with 2D FSE sequence were obtained first, and hrMRI with 3D FSE sequence using variable flip angle technique was performed immediately afterward. Detailed acquisition parameters are presented in Table S1.

Image analysis: diagnostic performance

Image interpretation was independently conducted by two experienced neuroradiologists (F.F. and H.Y. with 25 and 16 years of experience in neuroradiology, respectively), who were blinded to patient information. The evaluation order of cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI sequences was randomized. The identification of pituitary microadenomas on images was scored based on a three-point scale (0 = poor; 1 = fair; 2 = excellent). Scores of 1 or 2 represented the identification of the lesion. Reference standards were established by using all available imaging, clinical, surgical, and pathological resources, with a multidisciplinary team approach.

Image analysis: image quality

Two readers (Z.L. and B.H. with 4 years of experience in radiology, respectively) were asked to assess the image quality of cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI. Before exposure to images used in the current study, these readers underwent a training session to make sure that they were comparable to the experienced neuroradiologists in terms of image quality assessment. Images were presented in a random order. Image quality was assessed by using a 5-point Likert scale [17], including overall image quality (1 = non-diagnostic; 2 = poor; 3 = fair; 4 = good; 5 = excellent), sharpness (1 = non-diagnostic; 2 = not sharp; 3 = a little sharp; 4 = moderately sharp; 5 = satisfyingly sharp), and structural conspicuity (1 = non-diagnostic; 2 = poor; 3 = fair; 4 = good; 5 = excellent). An example of image quality assessment is shown in Table S2. Final decision was made through a consensus agreement.

The mean signal intensity of pituitary microadenomas, pituitary gland, and noise on cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI was measured using an operator-defined region of interest. For noise, a 10-mm2 region of interest was placed in the background, and noise was defined as the standard deviation of the signal intensity of the background [17]. For pituitary microadenomas and pituitary gland, the region of interest should include a representative portion of the structure. The mean signal intensity of the pituitary microadenoma was replaced with that of the pituitary gland when no microadenoma was identified. A signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was defined as the mean signal intensity of the pituitary microadenoma divided by noise. A contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was defined as the absolute difference of the mean signal intensity between the normal pituitary gland and pituitary microadenomas divided by noise [17]. Supplementary Fig. 1 shows how to measure the SNR and CNR with the region of interest in a contrast-enhanced pituitary MRI. Supplementary Fig. 2 shows the selection of images for the SNR and CNR calculation.

Statistical analysis

The κ analysis was conducted to assess the inter-observer agreement for identifying pituitary microadenomas. The κ value was interpreted as follows: below 0.20, slight agreement; 0.21–0.40, fair agreement; 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80, substantial agreement; greater than 0.80, almost perfect agreement.

To assess the diagnostic performance of cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI for identifying pituitary microadenomas, the receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and the area under curves (AUCs) were compared between MR protocols for each reader by using the DeLong test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to evaluate the difference in image quality scores and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate SNR and CNR measurements between MR protocols. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc Statistical Software (version 20.0.15; MedCalc Software) and SPSS Statistics (version 22.0; IBM).

Results

Clinical characteristics

A total of 69 patients (median age, 39 years; interquartile range [IQR], 29–54 years; 38 women [55%]) with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome were included in the study and their clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Among the 69 patients, 60 (87%) patients were diagnosed with Cushing’s disease and 9 (13%) were ectopic ACTH syndrome. The median disease course was 36 months (IQR, 12–78 months). The median serum cortisol, ACTH, and 24-h urine free cortisol level before surgery were 33.0 μg/dL (IQR, 25.1–40.1 μg/dL; normal range 4.0–22.3 μg/dL), 77.2 ng/L (IQR, 55.0–124.0 ng/L; normal range 0–46 ng/L), and 422.0 μg (IQR, 325.8–984.6 μg; normal range 12.3–103.5 μg), respectively. The median serum cortisol and 24-h urine free cortisol level after surgery were 3.0 μg/dL (IQR, 1.8–18.4 μg/dL) and 195.6 μg (IQR, 63.5–1240.3 μg), respectively. The median diameter of pituitary microadenomas was 5 mm (IQR, 4–5 mm), ranging from 3 to 9 mm.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the patients

Diagnostic performance of cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI for identifying pituitary microadenomas

The inter-observer agreement for identifying pituitary microadenomas by κ statistic between two readers was moderate on cMRI (κ = 0.50), moderate on dMRI (κ = 0.57), and almost perfect on hrMRI (κ = 0.91), respectively.

The diagnostic performance for identifying pituitary microadenomas on cMRI, dMRI, hrMRI, and combined cMRI and dMRI is summarized in Table 2. For reader 1, the diagnostic performance of hrMRI (AUC, 0.95; 95%CI: 0.87, 0.99) was higher than that of cMRI (AUC, 0.75; 95%CI: 0.63, 0.85; p = 0.002), dMRI (AUC, 0.59; 95%CI: 0.47, 0.71; p < 0.001), and combined cMRI and dMRI (AUC, 0.65; 95%CI: 0.53, 0.76; p = 0.001). For reader 2, the diagnostic performance of hrMRI (AUC, 0.97; 95%CI: 0.89, 1.00) was higher than that of cMRI (AUC, 0.74; 95%CI: 0.63, 0.84; p = 0.001), dMRI (AUC, 0.68; 95%CI: 0.56, 0.79; p = 0.001), and combined cMRI and dMRI (AUC, 0.70; 95%CI: 0.58, 0.80; p = 0.003).

Table 2 Diagnostic performance of cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI for identifying pituitary microadenomas

For reader 1, 23 of the 69 patients (33%) were misdiagnosed on both cMRI and dMRI, but 18 of the 23 misdiagnosed patients (78%) were correctly diagnosed on hrMRI. For reader 2, 17 of the 69 patients (25%) were misdiagnosed on both cMRI and dMRI, but 14 of the 17 misdiagnosed patients (82%) were correctly diagnosed on hrMRI.

Figure 2 shows that a 5-mm pituitary microadenoma was identified on preoperative pituitary MRI. The margin of the lesion was fully delineated on hrMRI, but not on cMRI and dMRI. Figure 3 shows that a 3-mm pituitary microadenoma was missed on cMRI, but identified on dMRI and hrMRI. Figure 4 shows that a 5-mm pituitary microadenoma was correctly diagnosed on hrMRI, but missed on cMRI or dMRI. Figure 5 shows that a 4-mm pituitary microadenoma was evident on coronal images as well as reconstructed axial and reconstructed sagittal images on hrMRI.

Fig. 2

figure 2

Images in a 56-year-old man with Cushing’s disease. The 5-mm pituitary microadenoma (arrow) can be identified on (a) coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image and (b) coronal dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image obtained with two-dimensional (2D) fast spin echo (FSE) sequence, but the margin is not fully delineated. The lesion (arrow) is well delineated on (c) coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image on high-resolution MRI obtained with 3D FSE sequence. d Intraoperative endoscopic photograph during transsphenoidal surgery after exposure of the sellar floor shows a round pituitary microadenoma (arrow)

Fig. 3

figure 3

Images in a 34-year-old woman with Cushing’s disease. No tumor is identified on (a) coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image obtained with two-dimensional (2D) fast spin echo (FSE) sequence. The 3-mm pituitary microadenoma (arrow) with delayed enhancement is identified on the left side of the pituitary gland on (b) coronal dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image obtained with 2D FSE sequence and (c) coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image on high-resolution MRI obtained with 3D FSE sequence. d Intraoperative endoscopic photograph during transsphenoidal surgery shows a 3-mm pituitary microadenoma (arrow)

Fig. 4

figure 4

Images in a 43-year-old man with Cushing’s disease. The lesion is missed on (a) coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image and (b) coronal dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image obtained with two-dimensional (2D) fast spin echo (FSE) sequence. c Coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image on high-resolution MRI obtained with 3D FSE sequence shows a round pituitary microadenoma (arrow) measuring approximately 5 mm with delayed enhancement on the left side of the pituitary gland. d Intraoperative endoscopic photograph for microsurgical resection of the 5-mm pituitary microadenoma (arrow)

Fig. 5

figure 5

Images in a 48-year-old woman with Cushing’s disease. Preoperative high-resolution contrast-enhanced MRI using three-dimensional fast spin echo sequence shows a 4-mm pituitary microadenoma (arrow) with delayed enhancement is well delineated on the left side of the pituitary gland on (a) coronal, (b) reconstructed axial, and (c) reconstructed sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. d Intraoperative endoscopic photograph during transsphenoidal surgery after exposure of the sellar floor shows a round pituitary microadenoma (arrow)

Image quality of cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI

Image quality scores of cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI are presented in Table 3. Scores for overall image quality, sharpness, and structural conspicuity on hrMRI (overall image quality, 5.0 [IQR, 5.0–5.0]; sharpness, 5.0 [IQR, 4.5–5.0]; structural conspicuity, 5.0 [IQR, 5.0–5.0]) were higher than those on cMRI (overall image quality, 4.0 [IQR, 3.5–4.0]; sharpness, 4.0 [IQR, 3.0–4.0]; structural conspicuity, 4.0 [IQR, 4.0–4.0]; p < 0.001 for all) and dMRI (overall image quality, 4.0 [IQR, 4.0–4.0]; sharpness, 4.0 [IQR, 4.0–4.0]; structural conspicuity, 4.0 [IQR, 4.0–4.5]; p < 0.001 for all).

Table 3 Image quality scores on cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI

The SNR and CNR measurements are shown in Table 4. The SNR of the pituitary microadenomas on hrMRI (67.5 [IQR, 51.2–92.1]) was lower than that on cMRI (82.3 [IQR, 61.8–127.2], p < 0.001), but higher than that on dMRI (53.9 [IQR, 35.2–72.6], p = 0.001). The CNR on hrMRI (26.2 [IQR, 15.1–41.0]) was higher than that on cMRI (10.6 [IQR, 0–42.6], p = 0.023) and dMRI (11.2 [IQR, 0–29.8], p < 0.001).

Table 4 SNR and CNR on cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI

Discussion

The identification of pituitary microadenomas is considerably challenging but critical in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Our study demonstrated that hrMRI with 3D FSE sequence had higher diagnostic performance (AUC, 0.95–0.97) than cMRI (AUC, 0.74–0.75; p ≤ 0.002) and dMRI (AUC, 0.59–0.68; p ≤ 0.001) for identifying pituitary microadenomas. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies specifically evaluating the identification of pituitary microadenomas on hrMRI with 3D FSE sequence by comparison with cMRI and dMRI in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, and this is the largest study conducted in ACTH-secreting microadenomas with a sensitivity of more than 90%.

Recently, techniques for pituitary evaluation have developed rapidly. Because of false negatives and false positives on cMRI and dMRI using 2D FSE sequence [7910], a 3D SPGR sequence was introduced for identifying pituitary adenomas. Previous studies demonstrated that the 3D SPGR sequence performed better than the 2D FSE sequence in the identification of pituitary adenomas with a sensitivity of up to 80% [11,12,13]. In patients with hyperprolactinemia, the 3D FSE sequence was recommended [14] and the 3D FSE sequence has rapidly developed recently with superior image quality [1516], suggesting that the 3D FSE sequence may be a reliable alternative for identifying pituitary adenomas. However, to our knowledge, few studies have investigated the diagnostic performance of the 3D FSE sequence for identifying ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas. To fill the gaps, we conducted the current study and revealed that images obtained with the 3D FSE sequence had higher sensitivity (90–93%) in identifying pituitary microadenomas, than that in previous studies using the 3D SPGR sequence [811,12,13].

There is a trade-off between spatial resolution and image noise. The reduced slice thickness can overcome the partial volume averaging effect, but it is associated with increased image noise [17]. Strikingly, our study showed that hrMRI had higher image quality scores than cMRI and dMRI, in terms of overall image quality, sharpness, and structural conspicuity. The SNR of the pituitary microadenomas on cMRI was slightly higher than that on hrMRI in our study. This is because the SNR was calculated as the mean signal intensity of the pituitary gland (instead of the pituitary microadenoma) divided by noise when no microadenoma was identified, and the mean signal intensity of the pituitary gland is higher than that of the pituitary microadenoma. About 40% of pituitary microadenomas were missed on cMRI, whereas less than 10% of pituitary microadenomas were missed on hrMRI. Given the situation mentioned above, the SNR on hrMRI was lower than that on cMRI. However, the CNR on hrMRI was significantly higher than that on cMRI and dMRI. Therefore, hrMRI in our study can dramatically improve the spatial resolution with high CNR, enabling the better identification of pituitary microadenomas.

The identification of pituitary adenomas on preoperative MRI in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome could help the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and aids surgical resection of lesions. It should be noted that most of the pituitary adenomas in patients with Cushing’s disease are microadenomas [56]. In our study, all the tumors are microadenomas with a median diameter of 5 mm (IQR, 4–5 mm), making the diagnosis more challenging. The sensitivity of identifying pituitary adenomas decreased from 80 to 72% after excluding macroadenomas in a previous study [12], whereas the sensitivity of identifying pituitary microadenomas in our study was 90–93% on hrMRI. In the current study, hrMRI performed better than cMRI, dMRI, and combined cMRI and dMRI, with high AUC (0.95–0.97), high sensitivity (90–93%), and high specificity (100%), superior to previous studies [811,12,13]. The high sensitivity of hrMRI for identifying pituitary adenomas will help surgeons improve the postoperative remission rate [4]. The high specificity of hrMRI will assist clinicians to consider ectopic ACTH syndrome, and then perform imaging to identify ectopic tumors. Besides, the inter-observer agreement for identifying pituitary microadenomas was almost perfect on hrMRI (κ = 0.91), which was moderate on cMRI (κ = 0.50) and dMRI (κ = 0.57). Therefore, hrMRI using the 3D FSE sequence is a potential alternative that can significantly improve the identification of pituitary microadenomas.

Limitations of the study included its retrospective nature and the relatively small sample size in patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome as negative controls. The bias may be introduced in the patient inclusion process. Only those patients who underwent all the cMRI, dMRI, and hrMRI scans were included. In fact, some patients will bypass hrMRI when obvious pituitary adenomas were detected on cMRI and dMRI. These patients were not included in the current study because of lack of hrMRI findings. Given the situation, the sensitivity of identifying pituitary adenomas will be higher with the enrollment of these patients. Besides, the timing of the sequence acquisition after contrast injection is essential [16] and bias may be introduced due to the postcontrast enhancement curve of both the pituitary gland and the microadenoma [14]. In the future, a prospective study with different sequence acquisition orders is needed to minimize possible interference caused by the postcontrast enhancement curve. Moreover, a larger sample size is also needed to verify the diagnostic performance of hrMRI using 3D FSE sequence for identifying pituitary microadenomas and to determine whether it can replace 2D FSE or 3D SPGR sequences for routinely evaluating the pituitary gland.

In conclusion, hrMRI with 3D FSE sequence showed higher diagnostic performance than cMRI and dMRI for identifying pituitary microadenomas in patients with Cushing’s syndrome.

Abbreviations

ACTH:
Adrenocorticotropic hormone
AUC:
Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve
cMRI:
Conventional contrast-enhanced MRI
CNR:
Contrast-to-noise ratio
dMRI:
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
FSE:
Fast spin echo
hrMRI:
High-resolution contrast-enhanced MRI
IQR:
Interquartile range
SNR:
Signal-to-noise ratio
SPGR:
Spoiled gradient re

called

References

  1. Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK (2015) Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 386:913–927

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Loriaux DL (2017) Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 376:1451–1459

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW et al (2015) Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:2807–2831

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  4. Yamada S, Fukuhara N, Nishioka H et al (2012) Surgical management and outcomes in patients with Cushing disease with negative pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. World Neurosurg 77:525–532

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vitale G, Tortora F, Baldelli R et al (2017) Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in Cushing’s disease. Endocrine 55:691–696

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jagannathan J, Smith R, DeVroom HL et al (2009) Outcome of using the histological pseudocapsule as a surgical capsule in Cushing disease. J Neurosurg 111:531–539

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. Boscaro M, Arnaldi G (2009) Approach to the patient with possible Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:3121–3131

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kasaliwal R, Sankhe SS, Lila AR et al (2013) Volume interpolated 3D-spoiled gradient echo sequence is better than dynamic contrast spin echo sequence for MRI detection of corticotropin secreting pituitary microadenomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 78:825–830

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lonser RR, Nieman L, Oldfield EH (2017) Cushing’s disease: pathobiology, diagnosis, and management. J Neurosurg 126:404–417

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Potts MB, Shah JK, Molinaro AM et al (2014) Cavernous and inferior petrosal sinus sampling and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of Cushing’s disease. J Neurooncol 116:593–600

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Grober Y, Grober H, Wintermark M, Jane JA, Oldfield EH (2018) Comparison of MRI techniques for detecting microadenomas in Cushing’s disease. J Neurosurg 128:1051–1057

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Fukuhara N, Inoshita N, Yamaguchi-Okada M et al (2019) Outcomes of three-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the identification of pituitary adenoma in patients with Cushing’s disease. Endocr J 66:259–264

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Patronas N, Bulakbasi N, Stratakis CA et al (2003) Spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state technique is superior to conventional postcontrast spin echo technique for magnetic resonance imaging detection of adrenocorticotropin-secreting pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1565–1569

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Magnaldi S, Frezza F, Longo R, Ukmar M, Razavi IS, Pozzi-Mucelli RS (1997) Assessment of pituitary microadenomas: comparison between 2D and 3D MR sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 15:21–27

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Lien RJ, Corcuera-Solano I, Pawha PS, Naidich TP, Tanenbaum LN (2015) Three-Tesla imaging of the pituitary and parasellar region: T1-weighted 3-dimensional fast spin echo cube outperforms conventional 2-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39:329–333

    PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Sartoretti T, Sartoretti E, Wyss M et al (2019) Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D T1w black blood turbo spin echo versus 2D T1w turbo spin echo sequence in pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 120:108667

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Kim M, Kim HS, Kim HJ et al (2021) Thin-slice pituitary MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction: diagnostic performance in a postoperative setting. Radiology 298:114–122

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Kai Sun, Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, for his guidance on the statistical analysis in this study.

Funding

This study has received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 82071899), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grants 2016YFC1305901, 2020YFA0804500), the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (grants 2017-I2M-3–008, 2021-I2M-1–025), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant L182067) and National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-B-067, 2022-PUMCH-B-114).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zeyu Liu and Bo Hou contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
  2. Hui You and Feng Feng contributed equally to this work and share corresponding authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng Distinct, Beijing, 100730, China

    Zeyu Liu, Bo Hou, Hui You, Mingli Li & Feng Feng

  2. Department of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng Distinct, Beijing, 100730, China

    Lin Lu, Lian Duan & Huijuan Zhu

  3. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng Distinct, Beijing, 100730, China

    Kan Deng & Yong Yao

  4. State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng Distinct, Beijing, 100730, China

    Yong Yao, Huijuan Zhu & Feng Feng

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hui You or Feng Feng.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Feng Feng.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no conflict of interest.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Happy 23rd Birthday!

happybirthday-2015

It’s unbelievable but the idea for Cushing’s Help and Support arrived 23 years ago last night.  That’s a long time for anything online.

I was talking with my dear friend Alice, who ran a wonderful menopause site called Power Surge, wondering why there weren’t many support groups online (OR off!) for Cushing’s and I wondered if I could start one myself and we decided that I could.

The first website (http://www.cushings-help.com) first went “live” July 21, 2000 and the message boards September 30, 2000. Hopefully, with these sites, I’m making some helpful differences in someone else’s life!

The message boards are very active and we have weekly online text chats, occasional live interviews, local meetings, email newsletters, a clothing exchange, a Cushing’s Awareness Day Forum, podcasts, phone support and much more.

Whenever one of the members of the boards gets into NIH, I try to go to visit them there. Other board members participate in the “Cushie Helper” program where they support others with one-on-one support, doctor/hospital visits, transportation issues and more.

Of course, we now have a Facebook page and 2 groups.  Both are secret, so if you want to join, please email  or PM me for an invitation.

Other sites in the Cushing’s Help “Family”

maryo colorful zebra

Cushing Syndrome – A Review

Abstract

Importance  Cushing syndrome is defined as a prolonged increase in plasma cortisol levels that is not due to a physiological etiology. Although the most frequent cause of Cushing syndrome is exogenous steroid use, the estimated incidence of Cushing syndrome due to endogenous overproduction of cortisol ranges from 2 to 8 per million people annually. Cushing syndrome is associated with hyperglycemia, protein catabolism, immunosuppression, hypertension, weight gain, neurocognitive changes, and mood disorders.

Observations  Cushing syndrome characteristically presents with skin changes such as facial plethora, easy bruising, and purple striae and with metabolic manifestations such as hyperglycemia, hypertension, and excess fat deposition in the face, back of the neck, and visceral organs. Cushing disease, in which corticotropin excess is produced by a benign pituitary tumor, occurs in approximately 60% to 70% of patients with Cushing syndrome due to endogenous cortisol production. Evaluation of patients with possible Cushing syndrome begins with ruling out exogenous steroid use. Screening for elevated cortisol is performed with a 24-hour urinary free cortisol test or late-night salivary cortisol test or by evaluating whether cortisol is suppressed the morning after an evening dexamethasone dose. Plasma corticotropin levels can help distinguish between adrenal causes of hypercortisolism (suppressed corticotropin) and corticotropin-dependent forms of hypercortisolism (midnormal to elevated corticotropin levels). Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling, and adrenal or whole-body imaging can help identify tumor sources of hypercortisolism. Management of Cushing syndrome begins with surgery to remove the source of excess endogenous cortisol production followed by medication that includes adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors, pituitary-targeted drugs, or glucocorticoid receptor blockers. For patients not responsive to surgery and medication, radiation therapy and bilateral adrenalectomy may be appropriate.

Conclusions and Relevance  The incidence of Cushing syndrome due to endogenous overproduction of cortisol is 2 to 8 people per million annually. First-line therapy for Cushing syndrome due to endogenous overproduction of cortisol is surgery to remove the causative tumor. Many patients will require additional treatment with medications, radiation, or bilateral adrenalectomy.

Cushing’s Syndrome: A New Drug Allows You To Avoid Surgery

In Italy it is estimated that there are about 3,000 patients suffering from Cushing’s syndrome, while in Europe the number rises to over 50,000.

The Cushing’s syndrome, a disease caused by the excessive production of cortisol by the pituitary gland due to a benign tumor of the gland, has seen a breakthrough in its treatment. Thanks to a new drug called osilodrostat, approved in 2020 by the Food and Drug Administration and subsequently by Aifa in Italy, patients unfit for surgery can benefit from a treatment that offers the same effects as a scalpel. Furthermore, this drug reduced symptoms in 80% of cases.

Cushing’s syndrome has been dubbed “full moon face disease” due to its most obvious visible effects, such as a rounding of the face caused by fat accumulation and visible weight gain also on the waist and back. Despite its symptomatic relevance, the disease has long been poorly understood by both healthcare professionals and the general public. To raise awareness of this syndrome, the #Thiscushing campaign has been launched, which aims to spread knowledge about the disease. The campaign recently stopped in Rome, during the Congress of the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), where a photographic exhibition was organized which represents moments of daily life of people affected by Cushing’s syndrome and their difficulties.

Despite the debilitating symptoms, Cushing’s syndrome is often underdiagnosed, resulting in delays in diagnosis of up to 5-7 years. The disease presents a wide range of symptoms, ranging from difficulty performing even simple daily activities such as tying your shoes or getting out of bed, to common manifestations such as high cholesterol, hypertension and hyperglycemia, which can be confused with symptoms of other less common pathologies. serious. It is for this reason that the EIS experts are appealing for the inclusion of Cushing’s syndrome in the list of rare pathologies recognized by the Ministry of Health, in order to facilitate timely diagnosis and faster access to the necessary treatments.

In Italy it is estimated that there are approx 3000 patients affected by Cushing’s syndrome, while in Europe the number rises to over 50,000. The disease mainly affects young women between 20 and 30 years old and is characterized by an excessive production of the hormone cortisol. If surgery to remove the pituitary tumor is not possible or unsuccessful, drug therapy with the new active ingredient osilodrostat may be a valid alternative for these patients.

Severe Osteoporosis in a Young Man with Bilateral Cushing’s Syndrome

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is challenging; however, through the clinical picture and the search for secondary causes of osteoporosis, it was possible to reach the diagnosis of the case reported. There was an independent, symptomatic ACTH hypercortisolism manifested by typical phenotypic changes, severe secondary osteoporosis and arterial hypertension in a young patient.

Case presentation

A 20-year-old Brazilian man with low back pain for 8 months. Radiographs showed fragility fractures in the thoracolumbar spine, and bone densitometry showed osteoporosis, especially when evaluating the Z Score (− 5.6 in the lumbar spine). On physical examination, there were wide violaceous streaks on the upper limbs and abdomen, plethora and fat increase in the temporal facial region, hump, ecchymosis on limbs, hypotrophy of arms and thighs, central obesity and kyphoscoliosis. His blood pressure was 150 × 90 mmHg. Cortisol after 1 mg of dexamethasone (24.1 µg/dL) and after Liddle 1 (28 µg/dL) were not suppressed, despite normal cortisoluria. Tomography showed bilateral adrenal nodules with more severe characteristics. Unfortunately, through the catheterization of adrenal veins, it was not possible to differentiate the nodules due to the achievement of cortisol levels that exceeded the upper limit of the dilution method. Among the hypotheses for the differential diagnosis of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia are primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia, McCune–Albright syndrome and isolated bilateral primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia or associated with Carney’s complex. In this case, primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia or carcinoma became important etiological hypotheses when comparing the epidemiology in a young man and the clinical-laboratory-imaging findings of the differential diagnoses. After 6 months of drug inhibition of steroidogenesis, blood pressure control and anti-osteoporotic therapy, the levels and deleterious metabolic effects of hypercortisolism, which could also impair adrenalectomy in the short and long term, were reduced. Left adrenalectomy was chosen, given the possibility of malignancy in a young patient and to avoid unnecessary definitive surgical adrenal insufficiency if the adrenalectomy was bilateral. Anatomopathology of the left gland revealed expansion of the zona fasciculate with multiple nonencapsulated nodules.

Conclusion

The early identification of Cushing’s syndrome, with measures based on the assessment of risks and benefits, remains the best way to prevent its progression and reduce the morbidity of the condition. Despite the unavailability of genetic analysis for a precise etiological definition, it is possible to take efficient measures to avoid future damage.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cushing’s syndrome may be exogenous or endogenous and, in this case, can be ACTH-dependent or independent. In the case reported, there was an independent, symptomatic ACTH hypercortisolism manifested by typical phenotypic changes, severe secondary osteoporosis and arterial hypertension in a young patient. Osteoporosis secondary to hypercortisolism occurs due to chronic reduction in bone formation, loss of osteocytes and increased reabsorption caused by intense binding of cortisol to glucocorticoid receptors present in bone cells [1]. In addition, excess cortisol impairs vitamin D metabolism and reduces endogenous parathyroid hormone secretion, intestinal calcium reabsorption, growth hormone release, and lean body mass [2]. Subclinical Cushing disease occurs in up to 11% of individuals diagnosed with early-onset osteoporosis and 0.5–1% of hypertension patients. [3] A cross-sectional study published in 2023 revealed a prevalence of 81.5% bone loss in 19 patients with Cushing’s syndrome [2]. The prevalence of osteopenia ranges from 60 to 80%, and the prevalence of osteoporosis ranges from 30 to 65% in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Additionally, the incidence of fragility fractures ranges from 30 to 50% in these patients [4] and is considered the main cause of morbidity affecting the quality of life. The diagnosis is challenging, given the presence of confounding factors; however, through the clinical picture and the search for secondary causes of osteoporosis, it was possible to reach a syndromic diagnosis. Early identification of this syndrome, with measures based on the assessment of risks and benefits, remains the best way to prevent progression and reduce morbidity related to this disease [2].

Case presentation

A 20-year-old Brazilian male patient reported low back pain that had evolved for 8 months, with no related trauma. He sought emergency care and performed spinal radiographs on this occasion (03/2019). Due to the several alterations observed in the images, he was referred to the Orthopedics Service of the Hospital of Federal University of Juiz de Fora, which prescribed orthopedic braces, indicated physical therapy and was referred again to the Osteometabolic Diseases outpatient clinic of the Endocrinology and Rheumatology Services of the Hospital of Federal University of Juiz de Fora on 10/2019.

The radiographs showed a marked reduction in the density of bone structures, scoliotic deviation with convexity toward the left and reduction in the height of the lumbar vertebrae, with partial collapses of the vertebral bodies at the level of T12, L1, L2, L3 and L5, with recent collapses in T12 and L1, suggesting bone fragility fractures. The same can be seen in posterior magnetic resonance imaging (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

figure 1

Radiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of lumbosacral spine in profile

Bone scintigraphy on 08/2019 did not reveal hyper flow or anomalous hyperemia in the topography of the thoracolumbar spine, and in the later images of the exam, there was a greater relative uptake of the tracer in the lumbar spine (vertebrae T10–T12, L2–L4), of nonspecific aspect, questioning the presence of osteoarticular processes or ankylosing spondylitis.

It was also observed in the bone densitometry requested in October 2019, performed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), low bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total femur, when comparing the results to evaluating the Z Score (Table 1).

Table 1 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Thus, the diagnosis of osteoporosis was established, and treatment with vitamin D 7000 IU per week was started due to vitamin D3 insufficiency associated with the bisphosphonate alendronate 70 mg, also weekly. The patient had a past pathological history of fully treated syphilis (2018) and perianal condyloma with a surgical resection on 09/2017 and 02/2018. In the family history, it was reported that a maternal uncle died of systemic sclerosis. In the social context, the young person denied drinking alcohol and previous or current smoking.

On physical examination, there were no lentiginous skin areas or blue nevi; however, wide violet streaks were observed on the upper limbs and abdomen, with plethora and increased fat in the temporal facial region and hump (Fig. 2a, b), limb ecchymosis, hypotrophy of the arms and thighs, central obesity and kyphoscoliosis. Systemic blood pressure (sitting) was 150 × 90 mmHg, BMI was 26.09 kg/m2, and waist circumference was 99 cm, with no reported reduction in height, maintained at 1.55 m.

Fig. 2

figure 2

Changes in the physical examination. a Violet streaks on the upper limbs, b Violet streaks on abdomen

An investigation of secondary causes for osteoporosis was initiated, with the following laboratory test results (Table 2).

Table 2 Laboratory tests

Computed tomography of the abdomen with adrenal protocol performed on 08/13/2020 characterized isodense nodular formation in the body of the left adrenal and in the lateral portion of the right adrenal, measuring 1.5 cm and 0.6 cm, respectively. The lesions had attenuation of approximately 30 HU, showing enhancement by intravenous contrast, with an indeterminate washout pattern in the late phase after contrast (< 60%) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

figure 3

Computed tomography abdomen with adrenal protocol

After contact with the interventional radiology of the Hospital of Federal University of Juiz de Fora, catheterization of adrenal veins was performed on 10/2020; however, it was not possible to perform adequate lesion characterization due to obtaining serum cortisol levels that extrapolated the dilutional upper limit of the method (Table 3).

Table 3 Adrenal catheterization

The calculation of the selectivity index was 6.63 (Reference Value (RV) > 3), confirming the good positioning of the catheter within the vessels during the procedure. The calculated lateralization index was 1.1296 (VR < 3), denoting bilateral hormone production. However, as aldosterone was not collected from a peripheral vein, it was not possible to obtain the contralateral rate and define whether there was contralateral suppression of aldosterone production [5].

Due to pending diagnoses for a better therapeutic decision and Cushing’s syndrome in clear evolution and causing organic damage, it was decided, after catheterization, to make changes in the patient’s drug prescription. Ketoconazole 400 mg per day was started, the dose of vitamin D was increased to 14,000 IU per week, and ramipril 5 mg per day was prescribed due to secondary hypertension. In addition, given the severity of osteoporosis, it was decided to replace previously prescribed alendronate with zoledronic acid.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen was performed on 06/19/2021, which demonstrated lobulated nodular thickening in the left adrenal gland with areas of decreased signal intensity in the T1 out-phase sequence, denoting the presence of fat, and homogeneous enhancement using contrast, measuring approximately 1.7 × 1.5 × 1.3 cm, suggestive of an adenoma. There was also a small nodular thickening in the lateral arm of the right adrenal, measuring approximately 0.8 × 0.6 cm, which was difficult to characterize due to its small dimensions and nonspecific appearance.

PPNAD or carcinoma became an important etiological hypothesis for the case described when comparing the epidemiology in a young man and the clinical-laboratory-imaging findings of the differential diagnoses. According to a dialog with the patient and family, the group of experts opted for unilateral glandular surgical resection on the left side (11/11/2021), where more significant changes were visualized, as there was a possibility of malignancy in a young patient and to avoid a definitive adrenal insufficiency condition because of bilateral adrenalectomy. This would first allow the analysis of the material and follow-up of the evolution of the condition with the permanence of the contralateral gland.

In the macroscopic analysis of the adrenalectomy specimen, adrenal tissue weighing 20 g and measuring 9.3 × 5.5 × 2.0 cm was described, completely surrounded by adipose tissue. The gland has a multinodular surface and varies between 0.2 and 1.6 cm in thickness, showing a cortex of 0.1 cm in thickness and a medulla of 1.5 cm in thickness (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

figure 4

Left adrenal

The microscopic analysis described the expansion of the zona fasciculate, with the formation of multiple nonencapsulated nodules composed of polygonal cells with ample and eosinophilic cytoplasm and frequent depletion of intracytoplasmic lipid content. No areas of necrosis or mitotic activity were observed. The histopathological picture is suggestive of cortical pigmented micronodular hyperplasia of the adrenal gland.

For the final etiological definition and an indication of contralateral adrenalectomy, which could be unnecessary and would avoid chronic corticosteroid therapy, or else, it would be necessary to protect the patient from future complications with the maintenance of the disease in the right adrenal gland, it would be essential to search for mutations in the PRKAR1A, PDE11A, PDE8B and PRKACA genes [15]; however, such genetic analysis is not yet widely available, and the impossibility of carrying it out at the local level did not allow a complete conclusion of the case.

Discussion

Through the clinical picture presented and the research of several secondary causes for osteoporosis, it was possible to arrive at the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome [6]. There was symptomatic independent ACTH hypercortisolism, manifested by typical phenotypic changes, severe secondary osteoporosis, and arterial hypertension in a young patient.

The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is always challenging, given the presence of confounding factors such as the following:

  • Physiological states of hypercortisolism—pseudo Cushing (strenuous exercise, pregnancy, uncontrolled diabetes, sleep apnea, chronic pain, alcohol withdrawal, psychiatric disorders, stress, obesity, glucocorticoid resistance syndromes);
  • Cyclic or mild—subclinical Cushing’s pictures;
  • Frequent and, even unknown, short- and long-term use of corticosteroids under different presentations;
  • Increase in the general population incidence of diabetes and obesity;
  • Screening tests with singularities for collection and individualized for different patient profiles.

It is important to note that the basal morning cortisol measurement is not the ideal test to assess hypercortisolism and is better applied to the assessment of adrenal insufficiency. However, the hypercortisolism of the case was unequivocal, and this test was also shown to be altered several times. As no test is 100% accurate, the current guidelines suggest the use of at least two first-line functional tests that focus on different aspects of the pathophysiology of the hypothalamic‒pituitary‒adrenal axis to confirm the hypercortisolism state: 24-hours cortisol, nocturnal salivary cortisol, morning serum cortisol after suppression with 1 mg of dexamethasone or after Liddle 1. Given that night-time salivary cortisol would require hospitalization, the other suggested tests were chosen, which are easier to perform in this context [78].

Subsequently, tests were performed to determine the cause of hypercortisolism, such as serum ACTH levels and adrenal CT. The suppressed ACTH denoted the independence of its action. CT showed bilateral adrenal nodules with more severe features: solid lesion, attenuation > 10 UI on noncontrast images, and contrast washout speed < 60% in 10 minutes. In this case, it is essential to make a broad clinical decision and dialog with the patient to weigh and understand the risks and benefits of surgical treatment [9].

Among the main diagnostic hypotheses for the differential diagnosis of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia are primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia, McCune–Albright syndrome (MAS) and bilateral primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia (PPNAD) isolated or associated with Carney’s complex. Another possibility would be bilateral adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent macronodular hyperplasia secondary to long-term adrenal stimulation in patients with Cushing’s disease (ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor) or ectopic ACTH production, but the present case did not present with ACTH elevation.

Primary macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (nodules > 1 cm) predominates in women aged 50–60 years and may also be detected in early childhood (before 5 years) in the context of McCune–Albright syndrome. Most cases are considered sporadic; however, there are now several reports of familial cases whose presentation suggests autosomal dominant transmission. Several pathogenic molecular causes were identified in the table, indicating that it is a heterogeneous disease [10]. The pathophysiology occurs through the expression of anomalous ectopic hormone receptors or amplified eutopic receptors in the adrenals. It usually manifests in an insidious and subclinical way, with cortisol secretion mediated through receptors for gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), vasopressin (ADH), catecholamines, interleukin 1 (IL-1), leptin, luteinizing hormone (LH), serotonin or others. Nodular development is not always synchronous or multiple; thus, hypercortisolism only manifests when there is a considerable increase in the number of adrenocortical cells, with severe steroidogenesis observed by cortisoluria greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. Patients with mild Cushing’s syndrome should undergo screening protocols to identify aberrant receptors, as this may alter the therapeutic strategy. If there is evidence of abnormal receptors, treatment with beta-blockers is suggested for patients with beta-adrenergic receptors or with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (and sex steroid replacement) for patients with LH/hCG receptors. In patients in whom aberrant hormone receptors are not present or for whom no specific pharmacological blockade is available or effective, the definitive treatment is bilateral adrenalectomy, which is known to make the patient dependent on chronic corticosteroid therapy [11]. Studies have shown the effectiveness of unilateral surgery in the medium and long term, opting for the resection of the adrenal gland of greater volume and nodularity by CT, regardless of the values obtained by catheterization of adrenal veins, but with the possibility of persistence or recurrence in the contralateral gland. Another possibility would be total unilateral adrenalectomy associated with subtotal contralateral adrenalectomy [12].

In McCune–Albright syndrome (MAS), there are activating mutations in the G-protein GNAS1 gene, generating autonomic hyperfunction of several tissues, endocrine or not, and there may be, for example, a constant stimulus similar to ACTH on the adrenal gland. In this case, pituitary levels of ACTH are suppressed, and adrenal adenomas with Cushing’s syndrome appear. Hypercortisolism may occur as an isolated manifestation of the syndrome or be associated with the triad composed of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, café au lait spots with irregular borders and gonadal hyperfunction with peripheral precocious puberty. The natural history of Cushing’s syndrome in McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS) is heterogeneous, with some children evolving with spontaneous resolution of hypercortisolism, while others have a more severe condition, eventually requiring bilateral adrenalectomy [13].

PPNAD predominates in females, in people younger than 30 years, multiple and small (< 6 mm) bilateral pigmented nodules (surrounded by atrophied cortex), which can reach 1.5 cm in adulthood, with family genetic inheritance (66%) or sporadic inheritance (33%), and as part of the Carney complex reported in 40% of cases. In 70% of cases, inactivating mutations are identified in the PKA regulatory 1-alpha subunit (PRKAR1A), a tumor suppressor gene [14]. Osteoporosis is often associated with this condition [15]. One test that can distinguish patients with PPNAD from other primary adrenocortical lesions is cortisoluria after sequential suppression with low- and high-dose dexamethasone. In contrast to most patients with primary adrenocortical disease, who demonstrate no change in urinary cortisol, 70% of PPNAD patients have a paradoxical increase in urinary cortisol excretion [16]. The treatment of choice for PPNAD is bilateral adrenalectomy due to the high recurrence rate for primary adrenal disease [17].

Carney complex is a multiple neoplastic syndrome with autosomal dominant transmission, characterized by freckle-like cutaneous hyperpigmentation (lentiginosis), endocrine tumors [(PPNAD), testicular and/or thyroid tumors and acromegaly] and nonendocrine tumors, including cutaneous, cardiac, mammary, and osteochondral myxomas, among others. In the above case, the transthoracic echocardiogram of the patient on 03/18/2021 showed cavities of normal dimensions, preserved systolic and diastolic functions, no valve changes and no lentiginous skin areas and blue nevi, making the diagnosis of the syndrome less likely. The definitive diagnosis of Carney requires two or more main manifestations. Several related clinical components may suggest the diagnosis but not define it. The diagnosis can also be made if a key criterion is present and a first-degree relative has Carney or an inactivating mutation of the gene encoding PRKAR1A [18].

The adenoma is usually small in size (< 3 cm), similar to the nodules in this case; however, it is usually unilateral, with an insidious and mild evolution, especially in adult women over 35 years of age, producing only 1 steroid class. Carcinomas are usually large (> 6 cm), and only 10% are bilateral. They should be suspected mainly when the tumor presents with hypercortisolism associated with hyperandrogenism. They have a bimodal age distribution, with peaks in childhood and adolescence, as well as at the end of life [3].

Conclusion

Early identification of Cushing’s syndrome, with measures based on the assessment of risks and benefits, remains the best way to prevent progression and reduce morbidity [2]. After 6 months of drug inhibition of steroidogenesis, blood pressure control and anti-osteoporotic therapy, the objective was to minimize the levels and deleterious metabolic effects of hypercortisolism, which could also harm the surgical procedure in the short and long term through infections, dehiscence, nonimmediate bed mobilization and cardiovascular events. Unilateral adrenalectomy was chosen, given the possibility of malignancy in a young patient and to avoid definitive surgical adrenal insufficiency if the adrenalectomy was bilateral. Despite the unavailability of genetic analysis for a precise etiological definition, it is possible to take efficient measures to avoid unnecessary consequences or damage.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional file 1]. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the link https://ufjfedubr-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/barbara_reis_ufjf_edu_br/EVpIR005sPZGlQvMJhIwSaUB0Hig4KOjhkG4D4cMggUwHA?e=Dk8tng.

Abbreviations

ACTH:
Adrenocorticotropic hormone
PPNAD:
Bilateral primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia
DXA:
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
GIP:
Gastric inhibitory peptide
GnRH:
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone
IL-1:
Interleukin 1
BMD:
Low bone mineral density
LH:
Luteinizing hormone
MAS:
McCune–Albright syndrome
PRKAR1A:
PKA regulatory 1-alpha subunit
ADH:
Vasopressin

References

  1. Pedro AO, Plapler PG, Szejnfeld VL. Manual brasileiro de osteoporose: orientações práticas para os profissionais de saúde. 1st ed. São Paulo: Editora Clannad; 2021. ISBN 978-65-89832-00-3.

  2. Naguib R, Elkemary EZ, Elsharkawi KM. The severity of bone loss: a comparison between Cushing’s disease and Cushing’s syndrome. J Endocrinol Metab. 2023;13(1):33–8. https://doi.org/10.14740/jem857.

    Article Google Scholar

  3. Vilar L, et al. Endocrinologia Clínica. 6th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2016.

    Google Scholar

  4. Wang D, Dang CX, Hao YX, Yu X, Liu PF, Li JS. Relationship between osteoporosis and Cushing syndrome based on bioinformatics. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(43): e31283.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Williams TA, Reincke M. Management of Endocrine Disease: diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism: the Endocrine Society guideline 2016 revisited. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179(1):R19–29. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0990.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N, National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), et al. UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. Nieman LK. Diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome in the modern era. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2018;47(2):259–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2018.02.001.

    Article Google Scholar

  8. Herr K, Muglia VF, Koff WJ, Westphalen AC. Imaging of the adrenal gland lesions. Radiol Bras. 2014;47(4):228–39. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1762.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  9. Hsiao HP, Kirschner LS, Bourdeau I, Keil MF, Boikos SA, Verma S, et al. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity, overlap with other tumor syndromes, and atypical glucocorticoid hormone secretion in adrenocorticotropin-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia compared with other adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2930–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-0516.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  10. Mircescu H, Jilwan J, N’Diaye N, et al. Are ectopic or abnormal membrane hormone receptors frequently present in adrenal Cushing’s syndrome? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(10):3531–6. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.10.6865.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Miller BS, Auchus RJ. Evaluation and treatment of patients with hypercortisolism: a review. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(12):1152–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3280.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Haddad NG, Eugster EA. Peripheral precocious puberty including congenital adrenal hyperplasia: causes, consequences, management and outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;33(3):101273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2019.04.007.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Bonnet-Serrano F, Bertherat J. Genetics of tumors of the adrenal cortex. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018;25(3):R131–52. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-17-0361.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Carney JA, Young WF Jr. Primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease and its associated conditions. Endocrinologist. 1992;2:6.

    Article Google Scholar

  15. Stratakis CA, Sarlis N, Kirschner LS, Carney JA, Doppman JL, Nieman LK, et al. Paradoxical response to dexamethasone in the diagnosis of primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(8):585–91. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-131-8-199910190-00006.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Powell AC, Stratakis CA, Patronas NJ, Steinberg SM, Batista D, Alexander HR, et al. Operative management of Cushing syndrome secondary to micronodular adrenal hyperplasia. Surgery. 2008;143(6):750–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.022.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Almeida MQ, Stratakis CA. Carney complex and other conditions associated with micronodular adrenal hyperplasias. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24(6):907–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2010.10.006.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  18. Hannah-Shmouni F, Stratakis CA. A gene-based classification of primary adrenocortical hyperplasias. Horm Metab Res. 2020;52(3):133–41. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1107-2972.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Serviço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Bárbara Oliveira Reis, Christianne Toledo Sousa Leal, Danielle Guedes Andrade Ezequiel, Ana Carmen dos Santos Ribeiro Simões Juliano, Flávia Lopes de Macedo Veloso, Leila Marcia da Silva, Lize Vargas Ferreira, Mariana Ferreira & Gabriel Zeferino De Oliveira Souza

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the conception and design of the work and have approved the submitted version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bárbara Oliveira Reis.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Surgical removal of adrenal gland.