Novel Cushing’s Syndrome Drug Improves Hypertension, Hyperglycemia

The investigational selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator relacorilant led to improvements in blood pressure, fasting glucose, and weight for patients with adrenal hypercortisolism, a pair of phase III studies showed.

In pooled data from the GRACE and GRADIENT trials, adults with adrenal hypercortisolism and hypertension on relacorilant had a significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (-10.1 and -6.3 mm Hg, respectively) compared with placebo (1.5 and 2.2 mm Hg, respectively; both P<0.01), according to Corin Badiu, MD, PhD, of the Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy and National Institute of Endocrinology in Bucharest, Romania.

At week 22, relacorilant patients had an average blood pressure of 128/81 mm Hg compared with 135/84 mm Hg with placebo, Badiu reported at ENDO 2025, the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.

As for those with hyperglycemia with or without hypertension at baseline, relacorilant significantly improved fasting glucose and glucose area under the curve (-0.7 and -2.4 mmol/L per hour, respectively) compared with placebo (0.4 and 1.3 mmol/L per hour, respectively; both P<0.05).

Relacorilant-treated participants also lost 4.1 kg (9 lb) compared with 1 kg (2.2 lb) in placebo patients (P<0.01).

“We expected a good hypertension control and an improved control of diabetes [with relacorilant],” Badiu told MedPage Today.

Acting as a selective cortisol modulator, relacorilant works by binding to the glucocorticoid receptor but not to other hormone receptors in the body. It was granted orphan drug designation by the FDA.

It works differently than other agents indicated for endogenous hypercortisolism (also known as Cushing’s syndrome) like the nonselective glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone (Korlym), which can be difficult to use given its drug-drug interactions and side effects like endometrial hypertrophy and vaginal bleeding.

If approved, relacorilant could be a treatment option for patients with mild autonomous hypercortisolism with resistant hypertension or difficult-to-treat diabetes who are avoiding or reluctant to surgery, or have had previous unsuccessful surgery, said Badiu.

Because metabolic issues are so prevalent in endogenous hypercortisolism, Badiu advised healthcare providers to take “an active attitude for screening for endogenous autonomous hypercortisolism in every individual patient with metabolic syndrome.”

After confirmation of an endogenous hypercortisolism diagnosis, providers should present all available treatment options from surgery to medical treatment in a personalized manner, using multidisciplinary management — cardiology, endocrinology, imaging, surgery, rheumatology, psychology, etc. — in order to make appropriate decisions, he recommended.

The GRACE and GRADIENT trials recruited participants ages 18 to 80 with endogenous hypercortisolism along with hypertension, hyperglycemia (defined as impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes), or both.

At baseline, patients given relacorilant had an average weight of 88.6 kg (195.3 lb) and waist circumference was 110.9 cm. Those with hypertension with or without hyperglycemia had average 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressures of 139.1 mm Hg and 86.4 mm Hg, respectively. For those with hyperglycemia with or without hypertension, average HbA1c was 6.5%, glucose area under the curve was 23.6 mmol/L per hour, and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test was 11.8 mmol/L.

Participants on relacorilant had their dose titrated from 100 mg to 400 mg once daily based on tolerability and efficacy.

Treatment was safe and well-tolerated among patients, said Badiu, with no new emerging safety signal. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity.

As for adverse events of interest, there were no cases of relacorilant-induced irregular vaginal bleeding with endometrial hypertrophy or adrenal insufficiency, no events of relacorilant-induced QT prolongation, and no increases in cortisol concentrations and relacorilant-induced hypokalemia.

“Lack of hypokalemia as an adverse event was an additional positive finding,” said Badiu. “Some long-term effects on mood, sleep behavior, coagulation profile, bone metabolism, liver steatosis, and body composition are still subject to detailed analysis.”

Developer Corcept Therapeutics submitted a new drug application for relacorilant to the FDA late last year; a decision on approval is expected by the end of 2025. The drug is also currently being studied for ovarian, adrenal, and prostate cancers.

From https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/endo/116508

 

Impact of Remission Status in Endogenous Cushing’s Syndrome on Cancer Incidence

Abstract

Objective
Endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) has been linked with an increased risk of cancer. We aimed to evaluate the association between cancer risk and disease remission post-surgery in adrenal CS and Cushing’s disease (CD).
Design
A nationwide retrospective matched-cohort study of patients with CS diagnosed between 2000-2023 in Israel, using Clalit Health Services’ database. Methods Patients with CS were matched 1:5 with controls by age, sex, socioeconomic status, and BMI. Remission status post-surgery was assessed within two years after the diagnosis of CS. The outcome measured was time to first diagnosis of malignancy, at least three years post-CS diagnosis, excluding those who died or developed cancer earlier. Malignancy risk, stratified by remission status, was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards with death as a competing event.
Results
The cohort comprised 388 cases and 1,862 controls [mean age at diagnosis, 47.4±16.8 years; 1,534 (68.2%) women]. Among patients with CD, those who did not achieve remission within 2 years post diagnosis (n=69) had a higher risk of malignancy compared to those who achieved remission (n=99) (HR 3.89, 95% CI 1.41-10.75). Cancer risk in patients with CD who achieved remission was similar to that of the controls (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.23-1.47). In patients with adrenal CS, the risk of cancer was comparable between those who did not achieve early remission (n=39) and those who did (n=113) (HR 1.68, 95% CI 0.83-3.40).
Conclusion
Though cancer risk is higher in both CD and adrenal CS, we have shown that achieving surgical remission within 2 years may attenuate cancer risk in patients with CD, but not in those with adrenal CS.

Cancer risk elevated for adults after Cushing’s syndrome diagnosis

I certainly know this to be true :(  I’m an 18 year survivor of yet another disease that I shouldn’t have gotten:  kidney cancer.

 

Key takeaways:

  • Adults with Cushing’s syndrome have a 78% higher risk for any cancer compared with controls.
  • Cushing’s syndrome is tied to a higher risk for genitourinary cancers, thyroid cancer and adrenocortical carcinoma.

Adults diagnosed with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome have a higher risk for developing cancer compared with controls without the condition, according to data published in the European Journal of Endocrinology.

In a retrospective analysis of data from the Clalit Health Services’ electronic health record database in Israel, 19% of adults with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome were diagnosed with cancer during a median follow-up of 14.7 years compared with 11.1% of adults without Cushing’s syndrome (HR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.44-2.2).

Adults with Cushing's syndrome have an increased risk for any type of cancer vs. controls. Data were derived from Rudman Y, et al. Eur J Endocrinol. 2024;doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvae098.

Adults diagnosed with Cushing’s syndrome also had a greater risk for genitourinary cancers (HR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.02-2.61), thyroid cancer (HR = 3.68; 95% CI, 1.68-8.01) and adrenocortical carcinoma (HR = 24.72; 95% CI, 2.89-211.56) than controls.

Amit Akirov

“Our study is the first to demonstrate an elevated cancer risk in patients with Cushing’s syndrome, highlighting the importance of raising awareness and the need to establish guideline recommendations for cancer screening in this population, especially for genitourinary, thyroid and gynecological cancers,” Amit Akirov, MD, associate professor in the faculty of medicine at Tel Aviv University and in the Endocrine Institute at Rabin Medical Center in Petach-Tikva, Israel, told Healio.

Akirov and colleagues obtained health record data for 609 adults diagnosed with Cushing’s syndrome from 2000 to June 2023 (mean age at diagnosis, 48.1 years; 65% women; 41.2% with Cushing’s disease, 32.8% with adrenal Cushing’s syndrome; 25.9% with undetermined etiology). Those with Cushing’s syndrome were matched, 1:5, by age, sex, socioeconomic status and BMI with a control group of 3,018 adults who were never tested for hypercortisolism. The outcome of interest was the first diagnosis of any malignant cancer after Cushing’s syndrome diagnosis with the except of nonmelanoma skin cancer.

The increased risk for cancer among those with Cushing’s syndrome was observed both among adults younger than 60 years (HR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.63-2.84) and those aged 60 years and older (HR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.02-1.98). Adults with obesity and Cushing’s syndrome had a higher risk for cancer than those with obesity and no hypercortisolism (HR = 2.21; 95% CI, 1.44-3.4). No difference in cancer risk was seen among adults without obesity.

Akirov told Healio that the researchers suspected the presence of Cushing’s syndrome could increase cancer risk prior to conducting the study.

“While some studies suggest that excess growth hormone or prolactin may be linked to an increased cancer risk, this association had not been previously examined in patients with Cushing’s syndrome,” Akirov said in an interview. “However, we hypothesized that elevated cortisol levels could provide a foundation for tumor development.”

Adults with Cushing’s disease had a higher risk for any cancer (HR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.15-2.36) and gynecological cancers (HR = 3.65; 95% CI, 1.16-11.52) than matched controls. Those with adrenal Cushing’s syndrome had an increased risk for any malignancy (HR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.7-3.29), lung cancer (HR = 3.06; 95% CI, 1.11-8.42), genitourinary cancers (HR = 2.42; 95% CI, 1.22-4.82), thyroid cancer (HR = 4.97; 95% CI, 1.24-19.87) and adrenocortical carcinoma diagnosed more than 5 years after Cushing’s syndrome diagnosis (HR = 19.73; 95% CI, 2.21-176.5) than controls.

More research is needed to confirm the findings, further assess which cancers adults with Cushing’s syndrome are at the greatest risk for being diagnosed with and whether there are any predictors for cancer in Cushing’s syndrome, according to Akirov.

For more information:

Amit Akirov, MD, can be reached at amit.akirov@gmail.com.

Published by:endocrine today logo
Sources/Disclosures

Disclosures: Akirov reports receiving occasional scientific fees for consulting and serving on advisory board for CTS Pharma, Medison and Neopharm. Please see the study for all other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.

 

Day 15, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Today’s Cushing’s Awareness Challenge post is about kidney cancer (renal cell carcinoma). You might wonder how in the world this is related to Cushing’s. I think it is, either directly or indirectly.

I alluded to this a couple days ago when I said:

I finally started the Growth Hormone December 7, 2004.
Was the hassle and 3 year wait worth it?
Stay tuned for tomorrow, April 15, 2016 when all will be revealed.

So, as I said, I started Growth Hormone for my panhypopituitarism on December 7, 2004.  I took it for a while but never really felt any better, no more energy, no weight loss.  Sigh.

April 14 2006 I went back to the endo and found out that the arginine test that was done in 2004 was done incorrectly. The directions were written unclearly and the test run incorrectly, not just for me but for everyone who had this test done there for a couple years. My endo discovered this when he was writing up a research paper and went to the lab to check on something.

So, I went off GH again for 2 weeks, then was retested. The “good news” was that the arginine test is only 90 minutes now instead of 3 hours.

Wow, what a nightmare my arginine retest started! I went back for that Thursday, April 27, 2006. Although the test was shorter, I got back to my hotel and just slept and slept. I was so glad that I hadn’t decided to go right home after the test.

Friday I felt fine and drove back home, no problem. I picked up my husband for a biopsy he was having and took him to an outpatient surgical center. While I was there waiting for the biopsy to be completed, I started noticing blood in my urine and major abdominal cramps.

There were signs all over that no cellphones were allowed so I sat in the restroom (I had to be in there a lot, anyway!) and I left messages for several of my doctors on what I should do. It was Friday afternoon and most of them were gone 😦  I finally decided to see my PCP after I got my husband home.

When Tom was done with his testing, his doctor took one look at me and asked if I wanted an ambulance. I said no, that I thought I could make it to the emergency room ok – Tom couldn’t drive because of the anaesthetic they had given him. I barely made it to the ER and left the car with Tom to park. Tom’s doctor followed us to the ER and instantly became my new doctor.

They took me in pretty fast since I was in so much pain, and had the blood in my urine. At first, they thought it was a kidney stone. After a CT scan, my new doctor said that, yes, I had a kidney stone but it wasn’t the worst of my problems, that I had kidney cancer. Wow, what a surprise that was! I was admitted to that hospital, had more CT scans, MRIs, bone scans, they looked everywhere.

My new “instant doctor” felt that he wasn’t up to the challenge of my surgery, so he called in someone else.  My next new “instant doctor” came to see me in the ER in the middle of the night.  He patted my hand, like a loving grandfather might and said “At least you won’t have to do chemotherapy”.  And I felt so reassured.

It wasn’t until later, much after my surgery, that I found out that there was no chemo yet that worked for my cancer.  I was so thankful for the way he told me.  I would have really freaked out if he’d said that nothing they had was strong enough!

My open radical nephrectomy was May 9, 2006 in another hospital from the one where the initial diagnosis was made. My surgeon felt that he needed a specialist from that hospital because he believed preop that my tumor had invaded into the vena cava because of its appearance on the various scans. Luckily, that was not the case.

My entire left kidney and the encapsulated cancer (10 pounds worth!) were removed, along with my left adrenal gland and some lymph nodes. Although the cancer (renal cell carcinoma AKA RCC) was very close to hemorrhaging, the surgeon believed he got it all.

He said I was so lucky. If the surgery had been delayed any longer, the outcome would have been much different. I will be repeating the CT scans every 3 months, just to be sure that there is no cancer hiding anywhere. As it turns out, I can never say I’m cured, just NED (no evidence of disease). This thing can recur at any time, anywhere in my body.

I credit the arginine re-test with somehow aggravating my kidneys and revealing this cancer. Before the test, I had no clue that there was any problem. The arginine test showed that my IGF is still low but due to the kidney cancer I couldn’t take my growth hormone for another 5 years – so the test was useless anyway, except to hasten this newest diagnosis.

So… either Growth Hormone helped my cancer grow or testing for it revealed a cancer I might not have learned about until later.

My five years are up now.  When I was 10 years free of this cancer my kidney surgeon *thought* it would be ok to try the growth hormone again.  I was a little leery about this, especially where I didn’t notice that much improvement.

What to do?

BTW, I decided to…

Challenging Case of Ectopic ACTH Secretion from Prostate Adenocarcinoma

Abstract

Cushing’s syndrome (CS) secondary to ectopic adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)-producing prostate cancer is rare with less than 50 cases reported. The diagnosis can be challenging due to atypical and variable clinical presentations of this uncommon source of ectopic ACTH secretion. We report a case of Cushing’s syndrome secondary to prostate adenocarcinoma who presented with symptoms of severe hypercortisolism with recurrent hypokalaemia, limb oedema, limb weakness, and sepsis. He presented with severe hypokalaemia and metabolic alkalosis (potassium 2.5 mmol/L and bicarbonate 36 mmol/L), with elevated 8 am cortisol 1229 nmol/L. ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome was diagnosed with inappropriately normal ACTH 57.4 ng/L, significantly elevated 24-hour urine free cortisol and unsuppressed cortisol after 1 mg low-dose, 2-day low-dose, and 8 mg high-dose dexamethasone suppression tests. 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT showed an increase in DOTANOC avidity in the prostate gland, and his prostate biopsy specimen was stained positive for ACTH and markers for neuroendocrine differentiation. He was started on ketoconazole, which was switched to IV octreotide in view of liver dysfunction from hepatic metastases. He eventually succumbed to the disease after 3 months of his diagnosis. It is imperative to recognize prostate carcinoma as a source of ectopic ACTH secretion as it is associated with poor clinical outcomes, and the diagnosis can be missed due to atypical clinical presentations.

1. Introduction

Ectopic secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is responsible for approximately 10–20% of all causes of Cushing syndrome [1]. The classic sources of ectopic ACTH secretion include bronchial carcinoid tumours, small cell lung carcinoma, thymoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET), and phaeochromocytomas [2]. Ectopic adrenocorticotropic syndrome (EAS) is diagnostically challenging due to its variable clinical manifestations; however, prompt recognition and treatment is critical. Ectopic ACTH production from prostate carcinoma is rare, and there are less than 50 cases published to date. Here, we report a case of ectopic Cushing’s syndrome secondary to prostate adenocarcinoma who did not present with the typical physical features of Cushing’s syndrome, but instead with features of severe hypercortisolism such as hypokalaemia, oedema, and sepsis.

2. Case Presentation

A 61-year-old male presented to our institution with recurrent hypokalaemia, lower limb weakness, and oedema. He had a history of recently diagnosed metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma, for which he was started on leuprolide and finasteride. Other medical history includes poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and hypertension of 1-year duration. He presented with hypokalaemia of 2.7 mmol/L associated with bilateral lower limb oedema and weakness, initially attributed to the intake of complementary medicine, which resolved with potassium supplementation and cessation of the complementary medicine. One month later, he was readmitted for refractory hypokalaemia of 2.5 mmol/L and progression of the lower limb weakness and oedema. On examination, his blood pressure (BP) was 121/78 mmHg, and body mass index (BMI) was 24 kg/m2. He had no Cushingoid features of rounded and plethoric facies, supraclavicular or dorsocervical fat pad, ecchymoses, and no purple striae on the abdominal examination. He had mild bilateral lower limb proximal weakness and oedema.

His initial laboratory findings of severe hypokalaemia with metabolic alkalosis (potassium 2.5 mmol/L and bicarbonate 36 mmol/L), raised 24-hour urine potassium (86 mmol/L), suppressed plasma renin activity and aldosterone, central hypothyroidism, and elevated morning serum cortisol (1229 nmol/L) (Table 1) raised the suspicion for endogenous hypercortisolism. Furthermore, hormonal evaluations confirmed ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome with inappropriately normal ACTH (56 ng/L) and failure of cortisol suppression after 1 mg low-dose, 2-day low-dose, and 8 mg high-dose dexamethasone suppression tests (Table 2). His 24-hour urine free cortisol (UFC) was significantly elevated at 20475 (59–413) nmol/day.

Table 1 
Investigations done during his 2nd admission.
Table 2 
Diagnostic workup for hypercortisolism.

To identify the source of excessive cortisol secretion, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary fossa and computed tomography (CT) of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis were performed. Pituitary MRI was unremarkable, and CT scan showed the known prostate lesion with extensive liver, lymph nodes, and bone metastases (Figure 1). To confirm that the prostate cancer was the source of ectopic ACTH production, gallium-68 labelled somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography (PET)/CT (68Ga-DOTANOC) was done, which showed an increased DOTANOC avidity in the inferior aspect of the prostate gland (Figure 2). Immunohistochemical staining of his prostate biopsy specimen was requested, and it stained positive for ACTH and markers of neuroendocrine differentiation (synaptophysin and CD 56) (Figures 3 and 4), establishing the diagnosis of EAS secondary to prostate cancer.

Figure 1 
CT thorax abdomen and pelvis showing prostate cancer (blue arrow) with liver metastases (red arrow).
Figure 2 
Ga68-DOTANOC PET/CT demonstrating increased DOTANOC avidity seen in the inferior aspect of the right side of the prostate gland (red arrow).
Figure 3 
Hematoxylin and eosin staining showing acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate featuring enlarged, pleomorphic cells infiltrating as solid nests and cords with poorly differentiated glands (Gleason score 5 + 4 = 9).
Figure 4 
Positive ACTH immunohistochemical staining of prostate tumour (within the circle).

The patient was started on potassium chloride 3.6 g 3 times daily and spironolactone 25 mg once daily with normalisation of serum potassium. His BP was controlled with the addition of lisinopril and terazosin to spironolactone and ketoconazole, and his blood glucose was well controlled with metformin and sitagliptin. To manage the hypercortisolism, he was treated with ketoconazole 400 mg twice daily with an initial improvement of serum cortisol from 2048 nmol/L to 849 nmol/L (Figure 5). Systemic platinum and etoposide-based chemotherapy was recommended for the treatment of his prostate cancer after a multidisciplinary discussion, but it was delayed due to severe bacterial and viral infection. With the development of liver dysfunction, ketoconazole was switched to intravenous octreotide 100 mcg three times daily as metyrapone was not readily available in our country. However, the efficacy was suboptimal with marginal reduction of serum cortisol from 3580 nmol/L to 3329 nmol/L (Figure 5). The patient continued to deteriorate and was deemed to be medically unfit for chemotherapy or bilateral adrenalectomy. He was referred to palliative care services, and he eventually demised due to cancer progression within 3 months of his diagnosis.

Figure 5 
The trend in cortisol levels on pharmacological therapy.

3. Discussion

Ectopic ACTH secretion is an uncommon cause of Cushing’s syndrome accounting for approximately 9–18% of the patients with Cushing’s syndrome [3]. Clinical presentation is highly variable depending on the aggressiveness of the underlying malignancy, but patients typically present with symptoms of severe hypercortisolism such as hypokalaemiaa, oedema, and proximal weakness which were the presenting complaints of our patient [4]. The classical symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome are frequently absent due to the rapid clinic onset resulting in diagnostic delay [5].

Prompt diagnosis and localisation of the source of ectopic ACTH secretion are crucial due to the urgent need for treatment initiation. The usual sources include small cell lung carcinoma, bronchial carcinoid, medullary thyroid carcinoma, thymic carcinoid, and pheochromocytoma. CT of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis should be the first-line imaging modality, and its sensitivity varies with the type of tumour ranging from 77% to 85% [6]. Functional imaging such as 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET and gallium-68 labelled somatostatin receptor PET/CT can be useful in localising the source of occult EAS, determining the neuroendocrine nature of the tumour or staging the underlying malignancy [36]. As prostate cancer is an unusual cause of EAS, we proceeded with 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in our patient to localise the source of ectopic ACTH production.

The goals of management in EAS include treating the hormonal excess and the underlying neoplasm as well as managing the complications secondary to hypercortisolism [3]. Prompt management of the cortisol excess is paramount as complications such as hyperglycaemia, hypertension, hypokalaemia, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, and psychosis can develop especially when UFC is more than 5 times the upper limit of normal [3]. Ideally, surgical resection is the first-line management, but this may not be feasible in metastatic, advanced, or occult diseases.

Pharmacological agents are frequently required with steroidogenesis inhibitors such as ketoconazole and metyrapone, which reduce cortisol production effectively and rapidly [36], the main drawback of ketoconazole being its hepatic toxicity. The efficacy of ketoconazole is reported to be 44%, metyrapone 50–75%, and ketoconazole-metyrapone combination therapy 73% [37]. Mitotane, typically used in adrenocortical carcinoma, is effective in controlling cortisol excess but has a slow onset of action [38]. Etomidate infusion can be used for short-term rapid control of severe symptomatic hypercortisolism and can serve as a bridge to definitive therapy [9]. Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, is indicated mainly in difficult to control hyperglycaemia secondary to hypercortisolism [8]. Somatostatin analogue has been proposed as a possible pharmacological therapy due to the expression of somatostatin receptors by ACTH secreting tumours [810]. Bilateral adrenalectomy should be considered in patients with severe symptomatic hypercortisolism and life-threatening complications who cannot be optimally managed with medical therapies, especially in patients with occult EAS or metastatic disease [38]. Bilateral adrenalectomy results in immediate improvement in cortisol levels and symptoms secondary to hypercortisolism [11]. However, surgical complications, morbidity, and mortality are high in patients with uncontrolled hypercortisolism [8], and our patient was deemed by his oncologist and surgeon to have too high a risk for bilateral adrenalectomy. For the treatment of prostate carcinoma, platinum and etoposide-based chemotherapies have been used, but their efficacy is limited with a median survival of 7.5 months [412]. The side effects of chemotherapy can be severe with an enhanced risk of infection due to both cortisol and chemotherapy-mediated immunosuppression. Prompt control of hypercortisolism prior to chemotherapy and surgical procedure is strongly suggested to attenuate life-threatening complications such as infection, thrombosis, and bleeding with chemotherapy or surgery as well as to improve prognosis [313].

There are rare reports of ectopic ACTH secretion from prostate carcinoma. These tumours were predominantly of small cell or mixed cell type, and pure adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation are less common [45]. There is a strong correlation between the prognosis and the types of malignancy in patients with EAS, and patients with prostate carcinoma have a poor prognosis [4]. These patients had metastatic disease at presentation, and the median survival was weeks to months despite medical treatment, chemotherapy, and even bilateral adrenalectomy [4], as seen with our patient who passed away within 3 months of his diagnosis.

In conclusion, adenocarcinoma of the prostate is a rare cause of EAS. The diagnosis and management are complex and challenging requiring specialised expertise with multidisciplinary involvement. The presentation can be atypical, and it is imperative to suspect and recognise prostate carcinoma as a source of ectopic ACTH secretion. Prompt initiation of treatment is important, as it is a rapidly progressive and aggressive disease associated with intense hypercortisolism resulting in high rates of mortality and morbidity.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Pathology Department of Changi General Hospital for their contribution to this case.

References

  1. I. Ilias, D. J. Torpy, K. Pacak, N. Mullen, R. A. Wesley, and L. K. Nieman, “Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion: twenty years’ experience at the national institutes of health,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 4955–4962, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Newell-Price, P. Trainer, M. Besser, and A. Grossman, “The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cushing’s syndrome and pseudo-cushing’s states,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 647–672, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Young, M. Haissaguerre, O. Viera-Pinto, O. Chabre, E. Baudin, and A. Tabarin, “Management of endocrine disease: cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic ACTH secretion: an expert operational opinion,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. R29–R58, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. S. Elston, V. B. Crawford, M. Swarbrick, M. S. Dray, M. Head, and J. V. Conaglen, “Severe Cushing’s syndrome due to small cell prostate carcinoma: a case and review of literature,” Endocrine Connections, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. R80–R86, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. O. M. Alshaikh, A. A. Al-Mahfouz, H. Al-Hindi, A. B. Mahfouz, and A. S. Alzahrani, “Unusual cause of ectopic secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone: cushing syndrome attributable to small cell prostate cancer,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 249–254, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Sundin, R. Arnold, E. Baudin et al., “ENETS consensus guidelines for the standards of care in neuroendocrine tumors: radiological, nuclear medicine and hybrid imaging,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 212–244, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J.-B. Corcuff, J. Young, P. Masquefa-Giraud, P. Chanson, E. Baudin, and A. Tabarin, “Rapid control of severe neoplastic hypercortisolism with metyrapone and ketoconazole,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 172, no. 4, pp. 473–481, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. K. Nieman, B. M. K. Biller, J. W. Findling et al., “Treatment of cushing’s syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 2807–2831, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. B. Carroll, W. J. Peppard, D. J. Herrmann et al., “Continuous etomidate infusion for the management of severe cushing syndrome: validation of a standard protocol,” Journal of the Endocrine Society, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Von Werder, O. A. Muller, and G. K. Stalla, “Somatostatin analogs in ectopic corticotropin production,” Metabolism, vol. 45, pp. 129–131, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. Klomjit, D. J. Rowan, A. G. Kattah, I. Bancos, and S. J. Taler, “New-onset resistant hypertension in a newly diagnosed prostate cancer patient,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1214–1217, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. Nadal, M. Schweizer, O. N. Kryvenko, J. I. Epstein, and M. A. Eisenberger, “Small cell carcinoma of the prostate,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 213–219, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. A. Collichio, P. D. Woolf, and M. Brower, “Management of patients with small cell carcinoma and the syndrome of ectopic corticotropin secretion,” Cancer, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1361–1367, 1994.View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2022 Wanling Zeng and Joan Khoo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

From https://www.hindawi.com/journals/crie/2022/3739957/