A Case 0f Hailey–Hailey Disease Accompanied by Cushing’s Syndrome and Adrenal Insufficiency Due to Long-Term Usage of Topical Steroids With Review of Literature

Posted on August 14, 2025 by MaryO
Abstract

Hailey–Hailey disease (HHD), or familial benign chronic pemphigus, is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by recurrent vesicles and erosions in intertriginous areas. Topical corticosteroids are the primary treatment, but their potential systemic side effects are often overlooked. Prolonged use on compromised skin can lead to excessive absorption, increasing the risk of iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome and adrenal insufficiency.

Here, we report the case of a 50-year-old woman with HHD who had been using topical clobetasol or betamethasone for over 10 years, reaching doses up to 50 g/day.

She developed Cushingoid features, metabolic abnormalities, and suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. After tapering off topical corticosteroids, she developed adrenal insufficiency and associated withdrawal symptoms. Following the initiation of hydrocortisone replacement therapy, psychiatric symptoms, impaired glucose tolerance, and osteoporotic fractures emerged, suggesting exacerbation of iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome.

This case highlights the risk of systemic complications from chronic topical corticosteroid use, particularly in high-absorption areas. Gradual dose reduction, close endocrine monitoring, and individualized tapering strategies are essential to prevent severe outcomes.

Clinicians should be aware of potential adrenal suppression and consider endocrine evaluation in patients receiving prolonged, high-dose topical corticosteroid therapy.

Filed under: adrenal, Cushing's, Rare Diseases | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Exogenous Cushing Syndrome and Hip Fracture Due to Over-the-Counter Supplement (Artri King)

Posted on August 18, 2023 by MaryO

​

Abstract

The most common cause of Cushing syndrome (CS) is exposure to exogenous glucocorticoids. There is an increasing incidence of adulterated over-the-counter (OTC) supplements containing steroids. We present a case of Artri King (AK)-induced CS in a 40-year-old woman who presented with an intertrochanteric fracture of her right femur. Laboratory testing revealed suppressed cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone, which was consistent with suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Following the cessation of the AK supplement, the patient’s HPA axis recovered, and the clinical manifestations of CS improved. This case emphasizes the need for better regulation of OTC supplements and the need for cautious use.

Introduction

Cushing syndrome (CS) is a condition that occurs because of high blood levels of glucocorticoids (GCs). These patients can present with a variety of systemic signs and symptoms, including truncal obesity, easy bruising of the skin, violaceous abdominal striae, resistant hypertension, dysglycemia, as well as osteoporosis. CS can occur because of adrenal etiologies such as adrenal adenoma, adrenal cancer, or adrenal hyperplasia or from an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-producing pituitary adenoma or ectopic tumor. However, the most common cause of CS is the exogenous administration of GCs [1]. While exogenous GCs are often medically prescribed for the treatment of inflammatory conditions, some patients may be accidentally exposed to exogenous GCs from over-the-counter (OTC) supplements. We present a case of a young woman who developed exogenous CS and suffered a hip fracture as a result of taking an OTC supplement, Artri King (AK), adulterated with GCs.

Case Presentation

A 40-year-old obese woman presented to the hospital following a fall at home. She reported a snapping noise and sudden right hip pain while trying to stand up, and subsequently fell to the floor. She had noted right-sided hip pain for several days preceding her fall. She was evaluated in the emergency department where computed tomography (CT) imaging of the right lower extremity showed an intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur (Figure 1). The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation of her right femur. The patient reported an unexplained weight gain of approximately 40 lbs in the preceding five months with a peak weight of 223 lbs (101 kg) and a body mass index (BMI) of 37 kg/m2. The patient denied taking any medications or supplements at the time of hospitalization. The endocrinology team was consulted to evaluate for causes of secondary osteoporosis in this young woman.

A-CT-scan-showing-the-right-intertrochanteric-fracture-of-the-right-femur-(yellow-arrows)
Figure 1: A CT scan showing the right intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur (yellow arrows)

Diagnostic assessment

Her vital signs showed a blood pressure of 142/96 mmHg, heart rate of 68 beats per minute, temperature of 98.1°F (36.7°C), and 98% oxygenation on room air. Physical examination did not reveal abdominal striae or buffalo hump. She did have supraclavicular fat deposition and central obesity. No proximal muscle weakness was present.

Laboratory tests were pertinent for decreased 25-hydroxy vitamin D, increased parathyroid hormone (PTH), and normal calcium (Table 1). These findings were consistent with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to vitamin D deficiency. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan revealed osteoporosis (Figures 2, 3 and Tables 2, 3). Further testing showed normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH), thus ruling out hyperthyroidism and primary ovarian insufficiency as possible causes of reduced bone mineral density (Table 1). Random cortisol was checked as hypercortisolism was suspected but it was found to be decreased along with decreased ACTH as well (Table 4). A cosyntropin stimulation test was performed, which showed decreased baseline cortisol with inappropriately decreased cortisol levels at 30 minutes and 60 minutes (Table 5). Given the discordance between the patient’s presentation and the lab results, assay interference was suspected, and further evaluation of the adrenal function was performed. Repeat labs using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) assay again confirmed persistently low cortisol (Table 4). A 24-hour free urine cortisol was too low to quantify per assay despite the adequate volume. Further evaluation showed overall low adrenal steroids, including deoxycorticosterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, 11-deoxycortisol, pregnenolone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, corticosterone, and progesterone.

Lab test Patient’s value Reference range
25-hydroxy vitamin D 12.8 ng/ml 30-100 ng/ml
Parathyroid hormone (PTH) 86.2 pg/ml 10-66 pg/ml
Serum calcium 9.5 ng/dl 8.8-10.5 mg/dl
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) 2.49 mIU/L 0.36-3.74 mIU/L
Estradiol 57.1 pg/ml 19.8-144.2 pg/ml
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) 5.4 mIU/ml 2.5-10.4 mIU/ml
Luteinizing hormone (LH) 6 mIU/ml 1.9-12.5 mIU/ml
Table 1: Patient’s lab values on admission
Dual-energy-X-ray-absorptiometry-(DEXA)-scan-of-the-femoral-neck-showing-osteopenia
Figure 2: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan of the femoral neck showing osteopenia
Dual-energy-X-ray-absorptiometry-(DEXA)-scan-of-the-lumbar-spine-showing-osteoporosis
Figure 3: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan of the lumbar spine showing osteoporosis
Region Area (cm2) Bone mineral content (g) Bone mineral density (g/cm2) T-score Peak reference Z-score Age-matched
Femoral neck 4.76 3.53 0.742 -1.0 87 -0.7 91
Total 33.39 26.14 0.783 -1.3 83 -1.1 85
Table 2: Summary of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan results of the femoral neck
Region Area (cm2) Bone mineral content (g) Bone mineral density (g/cm2) T-score Peak reference Z-score Age-matched
L1 10.79 7.56 0.701 -2.6 71 -2.4 73
L2 11.79 9.06 0.768 -2.4 75 -2.1 77
L3 12.70 9.98 0.786 -2.7 73 -2.4 75
L4 15.57 11.42 0.733 -3.0 69 -2.7 71
Total 50.86 38.03 0.748 -2.7 71 -2.5 73
Table 3: Summary of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan results of the lumbar spine
Lab test Patient’s values while on Artri King Patient’s values four weeks off of Artri King Reference range
Random cortisol (routine assay) <0.64 μg/dL 7.3 μg/dL 5-25 μg/dL
Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 1.5 pg/ml 12 pg/ml 7.2-63.3 pg/ml
Random cortisol (using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) assay) 0.526 μg/dL N/A 5-25 μg/dL
Table 4: Patient’s cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone levels before and after stopping Artri King
Cosyntropin stimulation test Patient value Reference range
Baseline cortisol 1.64 μg/dL 5-25 μg/dL
Cortisol after 30 minutes 1.33 μg/dL >18 μg/dL
Cortisol after 60 minutes 6.48 μg/dL >18 μg/dL
Table 5: Results of cosyntropin test while on Artri King

Treatment

She was started on teriparatide as well as vitamin D and calcium supplementation for the treatment of osteoporosis. Based on the aforementioned testing and the apparent symptoms of hypercortisolism, the patient was questioned again about the potential intake of steroids. She then recalled that she had been taking AK, an OTC supplement promoted for joint pain and arthritis. She reported that she had been taking two tablets of the supplement three times a day intermittently for the past three years. The patient neglected to bring it to the medical team’s attention before because she was under the impression that it was a multivitamin and did not have implications on her diagnosis. She was asked to stop the supplement and was educated about potential adrenal insufficiency symptoms and GC withdrawal.

Outcome and follow up

Repeat labs after four weeks off AK showed improved cortisol and ACTH levels indicating recovery of her hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (Table 4). She lost 25 lbs in this time span with lifestyle modification. She continues teriparatide for osteoporosis, and monitoring of her bone mineral density is planned.

Discussion

This patient initially presented with a pathological fracture of her right femoral head. Given her young age, causes of secondary osteoporosis, including CS, were explored. The prevalence of osteoporosis in CS patients is 50% [2]. The effects of GC on bone health have been well studied. The major mechanism by which GC affects bone mineral density is by impairment of bone formation. GCs increase osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis and decrease osteoblast function through their catabolic effects, which result in a dramatic decrease in bone formation rate. A prolonged lifespan of osteoclasts is observed with GC. A decrease in bone formation markers such as P1NP and osteocalcin has been observed in patients treated with GC [3]. Long-term GC use is associated with increased risk for fractures with a reported global prevalence of fractures of 30-50%. The risk for vertebral fractures is even higher, particularly in the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Interestingly, the risk for fracture with GC use peaks early in the course of treatment, often as early as three months into treatment, and declines rapidly after GC discontinuation [4]. An increased fracture risk has been described even with relatively low doses of GC (2.5-7.5 mg of prednisone or other equivalently dosed GC) and even with short-term use of under 30 days [5].

Our patient’s initial labs confirmed adrenal suppression despite our initial suspicion of CS, given her ongoing weight gain, central obesity, and osteoporosis. However, no obvious source of exogenous GC was identified. In most cases, the source of exogenous GC is easily identified through medication reconciliation; however, in our case, the patient was inadvertently exposed to steroids from an unregulated supplement, AK. The supplement’s ingredients were listed as glucosamine, chondroitin, collagen, vitamin C, curcumin, methylsulfonylmethane, nettle, and omega-3 fatty acids, with no mention of any steroid components. In a letter to the editor of the Internal Medicine magazine, several doctors published their concerns about a recent increase in CS cases associated with the use of AK and other similarly unregulated products [6]. Based on our literature search, three similar cases were published [7,8]. The reported cases developed CS after taking Artri King for several months, but none of them presented with a fracture.

A warning by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) was issued on April 20, 2022, indicating that FDA laboratory testing of this supplement confirmed the presence of undeclared drug ingredients, including dexamethasone, methocarbamol, and diclofenac. The FDA, however, was unable to confirm the exact amount of dexamethasone that these supplements contained [9]. Adverse events, including liver toxicity and death, were reported by the FDA.

One study revealed that between 2007 and 2016, the FDA had issued more than 700 warnings about the sale of dietary supplements that contained unlisted and potentially dangerous ingredients. The majority of these supplements included those marketed for sexual enhancement, weight loss, or muscle building [10]. This case highlights the risks of undisclosed ingredients in OTC supplements.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we recommend that a thorough reconciliation of medication and supplements be obtained for all patients with CS. Supplements should be stopped and HPA axis testing should be repeated in patients with suspected exogenous GC exposure, even if steroids are not declared in the ingredients. It is also important to monitor such patients for adrenal insufficiency due to GC withdrawal and consider GC tapering if necessary. Our patient showed improvement in cortisol levels with no overt symptoms of adrenal insufficiency without the need for GC therapy. This case demonstrates the first case of AK-induced CS resulting in a pathological fracture. Given the increased use and availability of OTC supplements, this case highlights on the importance of detailed history-taking and the role of supplements in causing CS. This case also stresses the need for further education and counseling of our patients as well as tighter control on the manufacturing and sale of these supplements.

References

  1. Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK: Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2015, 386:913-27. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61375-1
  2. Mancini T, Doga M, Mazziotti G, Giustina A: Cushing’s syndrome and bone. Pituitary. 2004, 7:249-52. 10.1007/s11102-005-1051-2
  3. Briot K, Roux 😄 Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. RMD Open. 2015, 1:e000014. 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000014
  4. Canalis E, Mazziotti G, Giustina A, Bilezikian JP: Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: pathophysiology and therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2007, 18:1319-28. 10.1007/s00198-007-0394-0
  5. Waljee AK, Rogers MA, Lin P, et al.: Short term use of oral corticosteroids and related harms among adults in the United States: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2017, 357:j1415. 10.1136/bmj.j1415
  6. Del Carpio-Orantes L, Quintín Barrat-Hernández A, Salas-González A: Iatrogenic Cushing syndrome due to fallacious herbal supplements. The case of Ortiga Ajo Rey and Artri King. Med Int Mex. 2021, 37:599-602.
  7. Patel R, Sherf S, Lai NB, Yu R: Exogenous Cushing syndrome caused by a “Herbal” supplement. AACE Clin Case Rep. 2022, 8:239-42. 10.1016/j.aace.2022.08.001
  8. Mikhail N, Kurator K, Martey E, Gaitonde A, Cabrera C, Balingit P: Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome caused by adulteration of a health product with dexamethasone. JSM Clin Case Rep. 2022, 3:
  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Public notification: Artri King contains hidden drug ingredients. (2022). Accessed: February 25, 2023: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/medication-health-fraud/public-notification-artri-king-contains-hidden-drug-ingredients.
  10. Tucker J, Fischer T, Upjohn L, Mazzera D, Kumar M: Unapproved pharmaceutical ingredients included in dietary supplements associated with US Food and Drug Administration warnings. JAMA Netw Open. 2018, 1:e183337. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3337

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/153927-exogenous-cushing-syndrome-and-hip-fracture-due-to-over-the-counter-supplement-artri-king#!/

​

Filed under: Cushing's, symptoms | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

No Synthetic Steroid Version of Korlym at This Time

Posted on December 11, 2021 by MaryO

Teva Pharmaceuticals suffered a fresh legal setback on Tuesday in its effort to market a generic version of the synthetic steroid Korlym to treat Cushing’s syndrome.

The Israeli drugmaker failed to convince the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board improperly denied its bid to cancel a patent held by Corcept Therapeutics covering a method for using Korlym to treat the hormone disorder.

Menlo Park, California-based Corcept last year made over $353 million from sales of Korlym, the company’s only drug, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Corcept’s patent relates to using a specific dose of Korlym’s active ingredient mifepristone and another drug to treat Cushing’s syndrome, which creates an excess of the hormone cortisol and causes high blood sugar, among other things.

Corcept sued Teva in New Jersey in 2018, alleging its proposed generic version of Korlym infringed the patent and others, in a case that is still ongoing. Teva asked the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to cancel the patent because earlier publications made it obvious that Corcept’s method would work to treat the disorder.

The board ruled for Corcept last year, and Teva appealed. Teva told the Federal Circuit that the PTAB held it to an improperly high standard for proving that the patent was invalid based on prior art.

Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Kimberly Moore, joined by Circuit Judges Pauline Newman and Jimmie Reyna, rejected Teva’s argument on Tuesday. Moore said the board found that a person of ordinary skill wouldn’t have reasonably expected Corcept’s treatment to be safe and effective before Corcept created it.

Moore also rejected Teva’s argument that the prior art disclosed a range of potential dosages that covered Corcept’s treatment.

Teva, Corcept and lawyers for the two companies didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

The case is Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc v. Corcept Therapeutics Inc, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 21-1360.

For Teva: John Rozendaal of Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox

For Corcept: Eric Stops of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan

From https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/teva-loses-bid-cancel-corcept-drug-patent-federal-circuit-2021-12-07/

Filed under: Cushing's, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Short-Term Oral Corticosteroid Use Tied to Higher Risks of GI Bleeds, Sepsis, Heart Failure

Posted on August 8, 2020 by MaryO

Study Authors: Tsung-Chieh Yao, Ya-Wen Huang, et al.; Beth I. Wallace, Akbar K. Waljee

Target Audience and Goal Statement: Primary care physicians, rheumatologists, pulmonologists, dermatologists, gastroenterologists, cardiologists

The goal of this study was to examine the associations between oral corticosteroid bursts and severe adverse events among adults in Taiwan.

Question Addressed:

  • What were the associations between steroid bursts and severe adverse events, specifically gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, sepsis, and heart failure?

Study Synopsis and Perspective:

It has long been known that long-term use of corticosteroids can be both effective and toxic. Long-term use is associated with adverse effects such as infections, GI bleeding/ulcers, cardiovascular disease (CVD), Cushing syndrome, diabetes and metabolic syndromes, cataracts, glaucoma, and osteoporosis. Most clinical practice guidelines caution against long-term steroid use unless medically necessary.

Action Points

  • In a retrospective cohort study and self-controlled case series, prescriptions for oral steroid bursts were found to be associated with increased risks for gastrointestinal bleeding, sepsis, and heart failure within the first month after initiation, despite a median exposure of just 3 days.
  • Note that the risks were highest 5 to 30 days after exposure, and attenuated during the subsequent 31 to 90 days.

Instead, clinical practice guidelines recommend steroid bursts for inflammatory ailments such as asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. Waljee and colleagues noted in 2017 that they are most commonly used for upper respiratory infections, suggesting that many people are receiving steroids in the real world.

In a retrospective cohort study and self-controlled case series, prescriptions for oral steroid bursts — defined as short courses of oral corticosteroids for 14 or fewer days — were found to be associated with increased risks for GI bleeding, sepsis, and heart failure within the first month after initiation, despite a median exposure of just 3 days, according to Tsung-Chieh Yao, MD, PhD, of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taoyuan, and colleagues.

The risks were highest 5 to 30 days after exposure, and attenuated during the subsequent 31 to 90 days, they reported in Annals of Internal Medicine.

The self-controlled case series was based on national medical claims records. Included were adults, ages 20-64, covered by Taiwan’s National Health Insurance in 2013-2015.

Out of a population of more than 15.8 million, study authors identified 2,623,327 people who received a steroid burst during the study period. These individuals were age 38 on average, and 55.3% were women. About 85% had no baseline comorbid conditions.

The most common indications for the steroid burst were skin disorders and respiratory tract infections.

The incidence rates among patients prescribed steroid bursts were 27.1 per 1,000 person-years for GI bleeding (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.75-1.84), 1.5 per 1,000 person-years for sepsis (IRR 1.99, 95% CI 1.70-2.32), and 1.3 per 1,000 person-years for heart failure (IRR 2.37, 95% CI 2.13-2.63).

Absolute risk elevations were similar in patients with and without comorbid conditions, meaning that the potential for harm was not limited to those at high risk for these adverse events.

The study authors acknowledged that they could not adjust for disease severity and major lifestyle factors such as alcohol use, smoking, and body mass index; because these factors were static, the effect could be eliminated using the self-controlled case series design. Their reliance on prescription data also meant they could not tell if patients actually complied with oral corticosteroid therapy. Furthermore, the exclusion of the elderly and younger populations also left room for underestimation of the risks of steroid bursts, they said.

Source References: Annals of Internal Medicine 2020; DOI: 10.7326/M20-0432

Editorial: Annals of Internal Medicine 2020; DOI: 10.7326/M20-4234

Study Highlights and Explanation of Findings:

Over the 3-year study period, steroid bursts were commonly prescribed to adults. Such prescriptions were written for common conditions, including skin disorders and upper respiratory tract infections. The highest risks for GI bleeding, sepsis, and heart failure occurred within the first month after receipt of the steroid burst, and this risk was attenuated during the subsequent 31 to 90 days.

“Our findings are important for physicians and guideline developers because short-term use of oral corticosteroids is common and the real-world safety of this approach remains unclear,” the researchers wrote. Notably, one corticosteroid that fits the bill is dexamethasone — a medication that holds promise for the treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients, although it is not generally prescribed orally for these patients.

Based on preliminary results, the NIH’s COVID-19 treatment guidelines panel recommended the use of “dexamethasone (at a dose of 6 mg per day for up to 10 days) in patients with COVID-19 who are mechanically ventilated and in patients with COVID-19 who require supplemental oxygen but who are not mechanically ventilated.” In addition, they recommend “against using dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 who do not require supplemental oxygen.”

“We are now learning that bursts as short as 3 days may increase risk for serious AEs [adverse events], even in young and healthy people. As providers, we must reflect on how and why we prescribe corticosteroids to develop strategies that prevent avoidable harms,” wrote Beth Wallace, MD, and Akbar Waljee, MD, both of the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and Michigan Medicine.

On the basis of the reported risk differences in the study, Wallace and Waljee calculated that one million patients exposed to corticosteroid bursts experienced 41,200 GI bleeding events, 400 cases of sepsis, and 4,000 cases of new heart failure per year that were directly attributed to this brief treatment.

“Although many providers already avoid corticosteroids in elderly patients and those with comorbid conditions, prescribing short bursts to ‘low-risk’ patients has generally been viewed as innocuous, even in cases where the benefit is unclear. However, Yao and colleagues provide evidence that this practice may risk serious harm, making it difficult to justify in cases where corticosteroid use lacks evidence of meaningful benefit,” they wrote in an accompanying editorial.

“Medication-related risks for AEs can, of course, be outweighed by major treatment benefit. However, this study and prior work show that corticosteroid bursts are frequently prescribed for self-limited conditions, where evidence of benefit is lacking,” Wallace and Waljee noted.

“As we reflect on how to respond to these findings, it is useful to note the many parallels between use of corticosteroid bursts and that of other short-term medications, such as antibiotics and opiates. All of these treatments have well-defined indications but can cause net harm when used — as they frequently are — when evidence of benefit is low,” they emphasized.

Last Updated August 07, 2020
Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine (Retired), Harvard Medical School, Boston

Primary Source

Annals of Internal Medicine

Source Reference: Yao TC, et al “Association between oral corticosteroid bursts and severe adverse events: a nationwide population-based cohort study” Ann Intern Med 2020; DOI: 10.7326/M20-0432.

Secondary Source

Annals of Internal Medicine

Source Reference: Wallace BI, Waljee AK “Burst case scenario: why shorter may not be any better when it comes to corticosteroids” Ann Intern Med 2020; DOI: 10.7326/M20-4234.

Additional Source

MedPage Today

Source Reference: Lou N “Sobering Data on Risks of Short-Term Oral Corticosteroids” 2020.

From https://www.medpagetoday.org/primarycare/generalprimarycare/87959?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2020-08-08&eun=g1406328d0r&utm_term=NL_Daily_DHE_dual-gmail-definition&vpass=1

Filed under: Rare Diseases | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Night Cortisol Levels for Diagnosing Cushing’s Syndrome Less Accurate in Clinical Practice

Posted on August 5, 2018 by MaryO

Salivary cortisol levels can be used to diagnose Cushing’s syndrome with relatively high reliability, but each test center should establish its own measurement limits depending on the exact method used for the test, a study from Turkey shows.

Researchers, however, caution that late-night salivary cortisol measurements in clinical practice is likely to be less accurate than that seen in controlled studies, and some patients might require additional tests for a correct diagnosis.

The study, “Diagnostic value of the late-night salivary cortisol in the diagnosis of clinical and subclinical Cushing’s syndrome: results of a single-center 7-year experience,” was published in the Journal of Investigative Medicine

In healthy individuals, the levels of cortisol — a steroid hormone secreted by the adrenal glands — go through changes over a 24-hour period, with the lowest levels normally detected at night.

But this circadian rhythm is disrupted in certain diseases such as Cushing’s syndrome, where night cortisol levels can be used as a diagnostic tool.

Among the tests that can be used to detect these levels are late-night serum cortisol (LNSeC) and late-night salivary cortisol (LNSaC) tests. Since it uses saliva samples, LNSaC is more practical and does not require hospitalization, so it is often recommended for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome.

So far, though, there has been no consensus regarding cutoff values and the sensitivity of the test.

Mustafa Kemal Balci, MD, and his team at the Akdeniz University in Turkey aimed to evaluate the diagnostic use of LNSaC in patients with clinical Cushing’s syndrome and in those with subclinical Cushing’s syndrome — people with excess cortisol but without signs of the disease.

The study involved 58 patients with clinical Cushing’s syndrome (CCS), 53 with subclinical Cushing’s syndrome (SCS), and 213 patients without Cushing’s syndrome who were used as controls.

Saliva and serum cortisol levels were measured in all patients, and statistical tests were used to study differences in these levels among the three groups of patients.

In CSC patients, the median cortisol levels were 0.724 micrograms per deciliter of blood (µg/dL), which dropped to 0.398 and 0.18 in patients with subclinical disease and controls.

The optimal cutoff point to distinguish patients with clinical Cushing’s was set at 0.288 µg/dL, where 89.6% of patients identified as positive actually have the disease (sensitivity), and 81.6% of patients deemed as negative were without the disease (specificity).

With a lower cutoff point — 0.273 µg/dL — researchers were also able to identify patients with subclinical disease with high sensitivity and specificity.

While the test showed high sensitivity and specificity values for clinical Cushing’s syndrome, its diagnostic performance was lower than expected in daily clinical practice, researchers said.

“The diagnostic performance of late-night salivary cortisol in patients with subclinical Cushing’s syndrome was close to its diagnostic performance in patients with clinical Cushing’s syndrome,” researchers wrote.

However, regarding the application of this test in other centers, they emphasize that “each center should determine its own cut-off value based on the method adopted for late-night salivary cortisol measurement, and apply that cut-off value in the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome.”

From https://cushingsdiseasenews.com/2018/07/31/late-night-salivary-cortisol-levels-questioned-diagnosis-cushings-syndrome/

Filed under: Cushing's, Diagnostic Testing | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Next Page »