Adrenal Cushing’s Syndrome in Pregnancy Complicated by Fetal Growth Restriction Following Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy

Posted on December 7, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

A 29-year-old Japanese pregnant woman, G5P3A1, conceived spontaneously and was referred to our hospital because of uncontrolled hypertension at 24 weeks of gestation. On admission, she presented with physical findings characteristic of Cushing’s syndrome (CS), such as moon face, buffalo hump, and reddish-purple striae. Laboratory examination revealed hyperglycemia and hypercortisolism with suppressed adrenocorticotropic hormone levels. Imaging studies revealed a right adrenocortical adenoma, and the patient was clinically diagnosed with adrenal CS. At 28 weeks, she underwent retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy, which normalized maternal cortisol levels and improved metabolic abnormalities. Despite these improvements, she was diagnosed with fetal growth restriction accompanied by superimposed preeclampsia at approximately 33 weeks. The maternal serum soluble fms-like kinase 1 (sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio was markedly elevated. At 36 weeks, an emergency cesarean section was performed for fetal compromise, resulting in the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant. Histopathological examination of the placenta revealed ischemic changes consistent with placental insufficiency. Both the mother and infant were discharged in stable conditions. The present case shows that although adrenalectomy during pregnancy can correct endocrine abnormalities, it does not necessarily prevent subsequent fetal growth restriction.

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is an endocrine disorder caused by chronic hypercortisolism. Because cortisol can disrupt ovulation, leading to menstrual irregularities and infertility [1,2], pregnancy in women with CS is exceedingly rare. Moreover, diagnosis during pregnancy is particularly challenging as many hallmark features of hypercortisolism – fatigue, weight gain, acne, and mood instability – are common in normal pregnancies.

Untreated CS during gestation is associated with substantially increased maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Aggressive management during gestation, including cortisol synthesis inhibitors or surgical resection of pituitary adenomas or adrenal tumors, has been shown to improve maternal and fetal outcomes [3-5]. However, intensive treatment may not fully reduce the risks of fetal growth restriction and preterm delivery [5,6], and the underlying reason for this remains unclear.

Herein, we report a case of adrenal CS in a pregnant woman who underwent retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy at 28 weeks of gestation. Despite achieving biochemical remission of hypercortisolism after surgery, she developed fetal growth restriction and required preterm cesarean delivery due to fetal compromise.

This article was previously presented as a meeting abstract at (1) the 97th Annual Congress of the JES on June 7, 2024; (2) the 60th Annual Congress of JSPNM on July 15, 2024; and (3) the 47th Annual Meeting of JSGOS on November 24, 2024.

Case Presentation

A 29-year-old Japanese woman with a G5P3A1 conceived spontaneously. She had no medical history other than asthma and no particular familial history. She began receiving antenatal care at a nearby facility during the first trimester. She did not undergo screening tests for predicting the development of preeclampsia (PE), such as the first-trimester ultrasound at 11-14 weeks or pregnancy-associated plasma protein A assessment. Her casual blood glucose level was 87 mg/dL at 10+6 weeks of gestation. Initially, she was normotensive, but her blood pressure gradually increased to 144/100 mmHg at 18 weeks of gestation, and diagnosed as having chronic hypertension. Thereafter, her hypertension worsened, reaching 177/100 mmHg at 21 weeks of gestation, and she was diagnosed with superimposed PE. Around the same time, her body weight increased by 11.5 kg from the pre-pregnancy weight (from 58.5 kg to 70 kg), and generalized edema developed. As a result, she was admitted to the referring hospital and started taking antihypertensive treatment with oral methyldopa 750 mg/day, which lowered her blood pressure to a range of 130-150/80-100 mmHg, decreased her body weight to 66.5 kg, and improved the generalized edema. Although she was discharged from the hospital, her blood pressure increased again; thus, she was transferred to our institution, a tertiary referral perinatal medical center, at 24+6 weeks of gestation for subsequent perinatal management.

At her initial visit, her height and body weight were 153 cm and 66.2 kg, respectively. Her vital signs were as follows: body temperature 36.0℃, blood pressure 159/115 mmHg with the use of antihypertensive medication, and heart rate 80/min. She had an obvious full-moon face, acne vulgaris (Figure 1A), a buffalo hump, and reddish-purple striae on her abdomen and thighs (Figures 1B, 1C). She also had bilateral pitting edema in her lower legs and thin skin on the backs of her hands. No anemic palpebral conjunctiva, cervical lymphadenopathy, or thyroid enlargement was observed.

Macroscopic-findings-characteristic-of-Cushing’s-syndrome
Figure 1: Macroscopic findings characteristic of Cushing’s syndrome

(A) Moon face, (B) reddish-purple striae

on abdomen, and (C) reddish-purple striae on thighs.

An increased neutrophil count and decreased eosinophil count were observed, although the white blood cell count was within the normal range (Table 1). Biochemical analysis showed that the serum potassium level was decreased (2.3 mEq/L). The serum total protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, and cholinesterase levels were mildly decreased. Renal function, hepatic function, and lipid profiles were within normal limits, except for elevated triglyceride levels. A spot urine test indicated an elevated urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (0.436 g/gCr) (Table 2). Regarding diabetes-related tests, fasting plasma glucose (91 mg/dL), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (5.4%), and glycated albumin (GA) (12.9%) were all within their normal ranges. The serum C-peptide level was elevated. A 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) conducted at 25+4 weeks of gestation showed serum glucose levels of 191 mg/dL at one hour and 212 mg/dL at two hours (Table 2), indicating postprandial hyperglycemia. Endocrinological evaluation revealed elevated morning serum cortisol levels with loss of diurnal variation. This hypercortisolism is accompanied by suppressed plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels (Table 3). The 24-hour urinary free cortisol (UFC) level was markedly elevated (1,380 μg/day). In contrast, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels decreased. Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) was markedly decreased (0.091 IU/mL), accompanied by mild reductions in free T3 (1.65 pg/mL) and free T4 (0.65 ng/dL), which indicated central hypothyroidism. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a nodule in the right adrenal gland with a maximum diameter of approximately 30 mm (28 × 27 × 25 mm) (Figure 2A). Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected a 27-mm well-defined nodular lesion at the same location, which demonstrated a signal drop on opposed-phase images (Figure 2B). Obstetric ultrasonography revealed an estimated fetal body weight of 742 g (adequate for gestational age) (Figures 3A–3C), an amniotic fluid index of 16.4 cm (Figure 3D), and no major structural anomalies of the fetus. From the day of referral, oral nifedipine (40 mg/day) was initiated as antihypertensive therapy. Potassium chloride (KCl) was administered orally.

Parameter Test value Reference range
CBC
WBC 8.1×109/L 3.3-8.6 ×109/L
Neut 83.5% 38.5-80.5%
Lymph 10.5% 16.5-49.5%
Mono 5.8% 2.0-10%
Eosino 0.1% 0.0-8.5%
RBC 3.17×1012/L 3.86-4.92 ×1012/L
Hb 11.5 g/dL 11.4-16.8 g/dL
Plt 190×109/L 158-348 ×109/L
Serum Biochemistry
TP 5.7 g/dL 6.6-8.1 g/dL
Alb 3.3 g/dL 4.1-5.1 g/dL
T-Bil 1 mg/dL 0.4-1.5 mg/dL
AST 15 U/L 13-30 U/L
ALT 27 U/L 7-23 U/L
LDH 326 U/L 124-222 U/L
ALP 55 U/L 38-113 U/L
γ-GTP 29 U/L 9-32 U/L
Na 146 mEq/L 138-145 mEq/L
K 2.3 mEq/L 3.6-4.8 mEq/L
Cl 107 mEq/L 101-108 mEq/L
Ca 8.5 mg/dL 8.8-10.1 mg/dL
P 2.1 mg/dL 2.7-4.6 mg/dL
BUN 6 mg/dL 8-20 mg/dL
UA 3.4 mg/dL 2.6-5.5 mg/dL
Cr 0.45 mg/dL 0.46-0.79 mg/dL
CRP 0.1 mg/dL 0-0.14 mg/dL
HDL-C 66 mg/dL 48-103 mg/dL
LDL-C 134 mg/dL 65-163 mg/dL
TG 211 mg/dL 30-117 mg/dL
FPG 91 mg/dL 73-109 mg/dL
HbA1c 5.4% 4.9-6.0%
GA 12.9% 12.3-16.5%
C-peptide 3.7 ng/mL 0.6-1.8 ng/mL
Endocrinology
Adrenaline <0.01 ng/mL <0.17 ng/mL
Noradrenaline 0.09 ng/mL 0.15-0.57 ng/mL
Dopamine <0.02 ng/mL <0.03 ng/mL
Cortisol 24.7 μg/dL 3.7-19.4 μg/dL
Aldosterone <4.0 pg/mL 4.0-82.1 pg/mL
Renin activity 0.7 ng/mL/hr 0.2-3.9 ng/mL/hr
DHEA-S 43 μg/dL 92-399 μg/dL
TSH 0.091 IU/mL 0.350-4.940 IU/mL
FT3 1.65 pg/mL 1.68-3.67 pg/mL
FT4 0.65 ng/dL 0.70-1.48 ng/dL
Table 1: Laboratory data of CBC, serum biochemistry, and endocrinology

CBC: complete blood count, WBC: white blood cell count, Neut: neutrophil, Lymph: lymphocyte, Mono: monocyte, Eosino: eosinophil, RBC: red blood cell count, Hb: hemoglobin, Plt: platelet count, TP: total protein, Alb: albumin, T-Bil: total bilirubin, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, γ-GTP: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, Na: sodium, K: potassium, Cl: chloride, Ca: calcium, P: phosphorus, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, UA: uric acid, Cr: creatinine, CRP: C-reactive protein, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG: triglyceride, FPG: fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c, GA: glycated albumin, C-peptide: connecting peptide, DHEA-S: dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone, FT3: free triiodothyronine, FT4: free thyroxine

Parameter Test value
75-g OGTT
PG
0 min 91 mg/dL
30 min 153 mg/dL
60 min 191 mg/dL
90 min 204 mg/dL
120 min 225 mg/dL
IRI
0 min 10.8 μU/mL
30 min 29.3 μU/mL
60 min 48.7 μU/mL
90 min 64.6 μU/mL
120 min 91.2 μU/mL
Urinalysis
U-Cr 39 mg/dL
U-TP 17 mg/dL
U-TP/Cr 0.436 g/gCr
Table 2: Laboratory data of 75-g OGTT and urinalysis

OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test, PG: plasma glucose, IRI: immunoreactive insulin, U-Cr: urinary creatinine, U-TP: urinary total protein

Parameter Test value Reference range
ACTH/F diurnal rhythm
ACTH
6:00 AM 2.1 pg/mL 7.2-63.3 pg/mL
4:00 PM 2.0 pg/mL 7.2-63.3 pg/mL
11:00 PM 2.3 pg/mL 7.2-63.3 pg/mL
F
6:00 AM 24.7 μg/dL 3.7-19.4 μg/dL
4:00 PM 25 μg/dL 3.7-19.4 μg/dL
11:00 PM 25.8 μg/dL 3.7-19.4 μg/dL
Table 3: Laboratory data of ACTH/F diurnal rhythm

ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone, F: cortisol

Radiological-findings-of-the-right-adrenal-tumor-(white-arrow)
Figure 2: Radiological findings of the right adrenal tumor (white arrow)

(A) Trans-abdominal ultrasonography image and (B) coronal section of the trunk on MRI.

Obstetric-ultrasonography
Figure 3: Obstetric ultrasonography

(A) The plane used for biparietal diameter measurement, (B) the plane used for abdominal circumference measurement, (C) the plane used for femoral length measurement, and (D) the plane used for amniotic fluid index measurement.

Physical examination revealed typical signs of CS, such as a moon face, buffalo hump, and reddish-purple striae. In addition, laboratory findings showed elevated UFC, increased nocturnal serum cortisol levels (>5.0 μg/dL), and suppressed ACTH levels (<5.0 pg/mL). On the basis of these findings, the patient was diagnosed with ACTH-independent CS. Furthermore, imaging studies identified a right adrenal mass, leading to a final diagnosis of CS caused by a right adrenal tumor. Both central hypothyroidism and impaired glucose tolerance were considered secondary complications, primarily caused by hypercortisolemia due to CS. The serum potassium level was maintained at approximately 3.0 mEq/L after the administration of oral KCl. An increase in the nifedipine dose from 20 mg/day to 40 mg/day stabilized the blood pressure at approximately 140/90 mmHg (Figure 4A). Intensive insulin therapy with insulin lispro was initiated on hospital day 4 (Figure 4B), and the insulin dosage was gradually increased for postprandial hyperglycemia. The maximum insulin dose was 41 units/day on day 23 of hospitalization. Throughout this period, the UFC levels remained persistently elevated (Figure 4C).

Clinical-course-between-hospitalization-and-cesarean-delivery
Figure 4: Clinical course between hospitalization and cesarean delivery

(A) Blood pressure trend, (B) total dose of insulin, and (C) urinary free cortisol trend.

A clinical team of obstetricians, urologists, and endocrinologists discussed the treatment plans for CS and perinatal management. Pharmacological treatment had two problems: radicality and risk of fetal adrenal insufficiency due to placental passage of medication; therefore, we decided to perform adrenalectomy during pregnancy. At 28+3 weeks of gestation, a retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy was performed by urologists. After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient lay on the bed in a complete left lateral position (Figures 5A, 5B). Consequently, the endoscope and instrument ports were placed in the same configuration as those used in the conventional retroperitoneal approach for nonpregnant patients. Port placements were planned guided by abdominal ultrasonography to identify the uterine position, and the assistant port was positioned at a location that minimized potential interference with the uterus. The surgery was completed without complications. The operative time was 83 minutes, and bleeding was minimal. Histopathological examination indicated that the tumor was an adrenocortical adenoma (Figures 6A–6C).

Photograph-showing-the-patient-in-the-left-lateral-decubitus-position-after-general-anethesia
Figure 5: Photograph showing the patient in the left lateral decubitus position after general anethesia

(A) Abdominal area and (B) dorsal area.

Histopathological-findings-of-the-right-adrenal-gland-(A,-B,-C)-and-placenta-(D)
Figure 6: Histopathological findings of the right adrenal gland (A, B, C) and placenta (D)

(A) Macroscopic view of the right adrenal gland showing the normal adrenal tissue (black asterisk) and the adrenal tumor (white asterisk). (B, C) Microscopic findings of the right adrenal gland and tumor (H&E staining).

(B) Normal adrenal gland (black asterisk) and adrenal tumor (white asterisk) separated by a thin fibrous capsule (black arrow).

(C) Tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm arranged in a trabecular to microacinar growth pattern.

(D) Microscopic findings of the placenta (H&E staining) showing fibrin deposition within villous vessels (black arrow) and chorionic villi with loss of nuclear detail and crowding (black asterisk).

After surgery, the maternal glucose tolerance rapidly improved, and intensive insulin therapy with insulin lispro became unnecessary (Figure 4B). To avoid postoperative adrenal insufficiency, replacement therapy with hydrocortisone was initiated at 200 mg/day immediately after surgery, and the dosage was gradually tapered to 25 mg/day before delivery (Figure 4C). Maternal thyroid function normalized two weeks after surgery. At 29 weeks of gestation, oral nifedipine (40 mg/day) was stopped and blood pressure was monitored; however, high blood pressure was sustained. Therefore, oral nifedipine was resumed at 20 mg/day at 31 weeks of gestation. At approximately 33 weeks of gestation, the fetus exhibited slow growth, leading to a diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. The levels of serum soluble fms-like kinase 1 (sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) were 173 (7990/46.1) at 33+0, 299 (11600/38.9) at 34+1, and 316 (15200/48.1) at 35+5 weeks. Trends in the estimated fetal body weight and standard deviation are shown in Figure 7. At 36+1 weeks of gestation, cardiotocography revealed severely prolonged deceleration regardless of the absence of uterine contraction, and an emergency cesarean section was performed. A male infant weighing 1,726 g and 41 cm in height, diagnosed as small for gestational age, was born with Apgar scores of 8 at one minute and 9 at five minutes. The umbilical arterial pH was 7.36. The size and weight of the placenta were 14.7 × 12.8 × 3.0 cm and 315 g, respectively, and histopathological examination revealed findings consistent with ischemic infarction (Figure 6D). Antihypertensive drugs administered to the mother were discontinued on day 8. The mother and neonate were discharged on POD 20. The child achieved normal development at the age of two years.

Trends-in-estimated-fetal-body-weight-(EFBW)-and-standard-deviation-(SD)
Figure 7: Trends in estimated fetal body weight (EFBW) and standard deviation (SD)

Discussion

This case illustrates adrenal CS in pregnancy, complicated by the subsequent development of fetal growth restriction, despite retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy at 28 weeks of gestation. Notably, a markedly increased maternal serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was detected at the time of diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case in which angiogenic markers were evaluated in a pregnant woman with adrenal CS.

The coexistence of CS and pregnancy is extremely rare [4]. The primary reason for this rarity is infertility, often caused by the hypercortisolism characteristic of CS. Specifically, hypercortisolism suppresses the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, leading to impaired follicular development and anovulation by disrupting the secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [1,7]. Pregnancy poses significant challenges in patients with ACTH-dependent CS, in whom excessive ACTH production is accompanied by androgen overproduction. As a result, adrenal etiologies of CS are more common than pituitary-dependent etiologies during pregnancy [3]. Several factors make it difficult to diagnose CS during pregnancy. First, the characteristic physical findings of CS closely mimic physiological changes in normal pregnancy. For example, weight gain, abdominal striae, and edema are common symptoms of both conditions. Therefore, this overlap can cause delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis of CS during pregnancy [3]. It has been reported that 21.5% of pregnant women with CS are diagnosed only after delivery [3]. Second, physiological hormonal changes during pregnancy complicate the diagnostic process. During gestation, the placenta produces corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and ACTH [8]. Additionally, elevated estrogen levels increase the synthesis of corticosteroid-binding globulin, resulting in a state of physiological hypercortisolism in pregnant women [9,10]. Consequently, the dexamethasone suppression test, which is key to the diagnosis of CS, is often unreliable in pregnant women because of the high incidence of false-positive results [4].

Despite these diagnostic hurdles, certain findings are highly valuable in identifying CS during pregnancy. First, careful examination of physical signs specific to CS, such as skin thinning and the presence of wide, reddish-purple striae, is crucial. Second, the evaluation of diurnal cortisol rhythms was informative. While this rhythm is preserved in normal pregnancy, it is characteristically absent in CS. Therefore, measuring late-night serum cortisol levels is useful for differentiating between these two states [11]. Third, a 24-hour UFC level exceeding three times the upper limit of normal for non-pregnant individuals is strongly suggestive of CS [4,7,9]. In the present case, these key features were decisive for the diagnosis. We found wide, reddish-purple striae, a loss of diurnal cortisol rhythm, and a markedly elevated 24-hour UFC level. Based on these findings, we definitively diagnosed the patient with CS complicating pregnancy.

According to a systematic review of 263 pregnancies complicated by CS, untreated pregnant women were significantly more likely to develop PE than those treated beforehand (26.5% vs. 2.3%) [3]. PE is characterized by defective placentation and impaired spiral artery remodeling, leading to placental ischemia during early pregnancy. Placental ischemia produces sFlt-1, a splice variant of Flt-1 that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor and PlGF and serves as a biochemical marker of endothelial dysfunction that inhibits angiogenesis [12]. Systemic endothelial dysfunction leads to maternal hypertension, proteinuria, and damage to other organs, including the placenta. In this case, placental histopathology indicated ischemic changes without retroplacental hematoma. In addition, a marked elevation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio – resulting from both increased sFlt-1 and decreased PlGF – was detected, supporting the presence of placental ischemia due to impaired placentation in early pregnancy.

In this case, several factors may have contributed to the placental ischemia. First, poor control of maternal hyperglycemia or hypertension may have played a role. As hyperglycemia is known to induce oxidative stress [13], it is possible that hyperglycemia in early pregnancy causes placental ischemia indirectly via oxidative stress. Recent studies suggest that hypertension in early pregnancy may contribute to impaired placentation, thereby increasing the risk of subsequent superimposed PE [14,15]. Therefore, chronic hypertension associated with CS may also be related to placental ischemia, although the maternal outpatient blood pressure was within the normal range during early pregnancy in the present case. Second, chronic hypercortisolemia can directly contribute to abnormal placentation. Previous animal experiments have shown that elevated maternal serum cortisol levels enhance uterine arterial contractions [16], which may induce placental ischemia. Furthermore, chronic hypercortisolism may exceed the protective capacity of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11β-HSD2), which shields the fetus from excessive cortisol, thereby directly affecting the fetus [17]. Based on these findings, it is presumed that irreversible placental damage had already occurred at the time of the surgical resection in this case. Preconceptional or at least early diagnosis and treatment of CS are crucial for preventing fetal growth restriction associated with superimposed PE after surgery.

The second trimester is generally considered the optimal period for adrenalectomy in pregnant patients with adrenal CS [18]; however, successful procedures have been reported even during the third trimester [6,19]. Endoscopic adrenalectomy is favored over open approaches owing to its reduced morbidity, although direct comparisons between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in pregnancy are lacking. In non-pregnant patients, both approaches yield similar operative times, blood loss, and hospital stays [20]. In this case, the retroperitoneal approach was used. This technique offers several advantages during pregnancy as follows: it allows surgery in the lateral position, minimizes inferior vena cava compression by the gravid uterus, avoids entry into the peritoneal cavity, thereby preventing interference from the enlarged uterus, and reduces the risk of intra-abdominal inflammatory spread to the uterus and adjacent organs. Based on our experience and considering the potential advantages of the retroperitoneoscopic approach, we propose that retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy should be considered even in the early third trimester, as it may safely prolong gestation and reduce the need for preterm delivery.

Conclusions

This case highlights the challenges of managing adrenal CS during pregnancy. Uncontrolled CS may impair placental development during early pregnancy; therefore, preconceptional or at least early recognition and appropriate management are crucial to minimize the risk of subsequent fetal growth restriction. Further research is needed to clarify the pathophysiological relationship between hypercortisolism and impaired placentation in early pregnancy and to refine strategies for managing this rare but high-risk condition.

References

  1. Castinetti F, Brue T: Impact of Cushing’s syndrome on fertility and pregnancy. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2022, 83:188-90. 10.1016/j.ando.2022.04.001
  2. Eschler DC, Kogekar N, Pessah-Pollack R: Management of adrenal tumors in pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2015, 44:381-97. 10.1016/j.ecl.2015.02.006
  3. Caimari F, Valassi E, Garbayo P, Steffensen C, Santos A, Corcoy R, Webb SM: Cushing’s syndrome and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review of published cases. Endocrine. 2017, 55:555-63. 10.1007/s12020-016-1117-0
  4. Hamblin R, Coulden A, Fountas A, Karavitaki N: The diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy. J Neuroendocrinol. 2022, 34:e13118. 10.1111/jne.13118
  5. Sammour RN, Saiegh L, Matter I, et al.: Adrenalectomy for adrenocortical adenoma causing Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy: a case report and review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012, 165:1-7. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.05.030
  6. Martínez García R, Martínez Pérez A, Domingo del Pozo C, Sospedra Ferrer R: Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy during pregnancy: the mainstay treatment. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016, 39:273-6. 10.1007/s40618-015-0345-0
  7. Younes N, St-Jean M, Bourdeau I, Lacroix A: Endogenous Cushing’s syndrome during pregnancy. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2023, 24:23-38. 10.1007/s11154-022-09731-y
  8. Sasaki A, Shinkawa O, Margioris AN, et al.: Immunoreactive corticotropin-releasing hormone in human plasma during pregnancy, labor, and delivery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987, 64:224-9. 10.1210/jcem-64-2-224
  9. Jung C, Ho JT, Torpy DJ, et al.: A longitudinal study of plasma and urinary cortisol in pregnancy and postpartum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011, 96:1533-40. 10.1210/jc.2010-2395
  10. Petraglia F, Sawchenko PE, Rivier J, Vale W: Evidence for local stimulation of ACTH secretion by corticotropin-releasing factor in human placenta. Nature. 1987, 328:717-19. 10.1038/328717a0
  11. Savas M, Mehta S, Agrawal N, van Rossum EF, Feelders RA: Approach to the patient: diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022, 107:3162-74. 10.1210/clinem/dgac492
  12. Jung E, Romero R, Yeo L, et al.: The etiology of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022, 226:S844-66. 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1356
  13. González P, Lozano P, Ros G, Solano F: Hyperglycemia and oxidative stress: an integral, updated and critical overview of their metabolic interconnections. Int J Mol Sci. 2023, 24:9352. 10.3390/ijms24119352
  14. Ueda A, Hasegawa M, Matsumura N, et al.: Lower systolic blood pressure levels in early pregnancy are associated with a decreased risk of early-onset superimposed preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: a multicenter retrospective study. Hypertens Res. 2022, 45:135-45. 10.1038/s41440-021-00763-6
  15. Burton GJ, Jauniaux E: Pathophysiology of placental-derived fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 218:S745-61. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.577
  16. Xiao D, Huang X, Bae S, Ducsay CA, Zhang L: Cortisol-mediated potentiation of uterine artery contractility: effect of pregnancy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002, 283:H238-46. 10.1152/ajpheart.00842.2001
  17. Albiston AL, Obeyesekere VR, Smith RE, Krozowski ZS: Cloning and tissue distribution of the human 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 enzyme. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1994, 105:11-17. 10.1016/0303-7207(94)90176-7
  18. Wang Y, An Y, Hou X, et al.: Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy secondary to adrenocortical adenoma: a case series and review. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2024, 7:e00474. 10.1002/edm2.474
  19. Shaw JA, Pearson DW, Krukowski ZH, Fisher PM, Bevan JS: Cushing’s syndrome during pregnancy: curative adrenalectomy at 31 weeks gestation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002, 105:189-91. 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00148-3
  20. Nigri G, Rosman AS, Petrucciani N, et al.: Meta-analysis of trials comparing laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Surgery. 2013, 153:111-19. 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.042

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/425273-adrenal-cushings-syndrome-in-pregnancy-complicated-by-fetal-growth-restriction-following-retroperitoneoscopic-adrenalectomy#!/

Filed under: adrenal, Cushing's, Rare Diseases, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Cushing’s Syndrome in a Young Woman Due to Prolonged Betamethasone Nasal Drop Use

Posted on August 11, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

Background

Cushing’s syndrome is an uncommon but serious condition caused by long-term exposure to elevated cortisol levels, which is usually iatrogenic in origin. Although systemic corticosteroids are the most frequent agents, the association of intranasal corticosteroids with this condition is remarkably rare.

Case presentation

This report is about a 21-year-old Iranian woman using betamethasone nasal drops for nasal obstruction. The patient presented with weight gain, Amenorrhea, mood disturbances, red purplish striae, and mild hirsutism. Hormonal assessments revealed suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates the underappreciated systemic effects of intranasal betamethasone to induce Cushing’s syndrome. It serves as a pivotal reminder of the need for vigilance in prescribing practices and reinforces the importance of early diagnosis to ensure favorable patient outcomes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is an endocrine disease caused by long-term or high-dose glucocorticoid use [1]. Although iatrogenic cases are commonly associated with oral or injectable glucocorticoids [2], few reports described CS after the use of intranasal steroid sprays (INS) such as betamethasone in adults [3,4,5,6,7]. Currently, INS is widely used for managing conditions such as allergic rhinitis, nasal polyposis, and other upper airway disorders owing to their localized effects and limited systemic absorption [8, 9]. However, prolonged use, high doses, or using potent formulations can lead to significant systemic absorption, resulting in Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis suppression, and frank CS [10]. Betamethasone nasal spray, a cornerstone in the treatment of nasal congestion, has the potential for systemic absorption by the nasal mucosa, particularly with prolonged or excessive use [11].

This report presents the case of a young woman who developed CS following the overuse of betamethasone nasal drops. It also highlights the importance of detailed patient histories when diagnosing CS and highlights the critical need to educate patients on the proper use and potential risks of steroid therapies to prevent complications. This case report adheres to the case report (CARE) guidelines [12].

Case presentation

This is the case of a 21-year-old Iranian female who presented with a history of rapid weight gain (30 kg in 8 months), irregular menstrual cycles, and significant mood changes. Her body mass index (BMI) was calculated at 40.07 kg/m2, classifying her as obese, and her blood pressure was recorded at 115/75 mmHg. In addition, she exhibited red–purple striae on her abdomen and limbs and mild hirsutism (modified Ferriman–Gallwey Score (FGS) score = 10), prompting admission for further evaluation after multiple outpatient visits yielded no definitive diagnosis.

Figure 1 is a clinical photograph (with patient consent) or an illustration of the red–purple striae.

Fig. 1

figure 1

Clinical photograph showcasing the red–purplish striae on the patient’s abdomen, arms, and lower limbs

Upon admission, the patient’s history revealed prolonged use of betamethasone 0.1% 1 mg/mL nasal drops, administered at a daily dosage of 5 cc, in combination with oxymetazoline (a sympathomimetic nasal preparation) at a daily dosage of 1 cc, over approximately 12 months, to address nasal obstruction. Her symptoms began 6 months after starting the nasal drops. Further medication history revealed no other corticosteroid use. Notably, the patient had a past diagnosis of polycystic ovary (PCO) syndrome made on the basis of Rotterdam 2003 criteria (oligomenorrhea since menarche and clinically androgen excess) but did not undergo treatment or maintain laboratory records.

A detailed hormonal evaluation was undertaken. Morning plasma cortisol less than 0.05 µg/dL and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) less than 5 (10–56 pg/mL) measurements were abnormally low. Her 24-hour urine-free cortisol concentrations of 1.04 µg/24 h were significantly reduced, indicating suppression of the HPA axis secondary to prolonged exogenous corticosteroid exposure. All tests were repeated several times by endocrinologists during the time course of disease manifestations.

Table 1 summarizes the hormonal test results to clearly display the abnormalities.

Table 1 Hormonal and biochemical test results with reference values

Imaging studies before admission included a computed tomography (CT) scan of the adrenal glands, which showed that both adrenal glands were of normal size. However, a dynamic pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an 11 mm pituitary gland, despite there being no rationale for imaging studies in this scenario.

The patient was counseled extensively about the condition, and betamethasone nasal drops were discontinued immediately. Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) consultation revealed normal findings and the psychiatric team diagnosed her with major depressive disorder (MDD). She was discharged on 15 mg prednisolone with a structured tapering plan to allow for gradual recovery of adrenal function and to prevent acute adrenal insufficiency. Follow-up appointments were scheduled to monitor her clinical progress and re-evaluate her HPA axis recovery.

Discussion

This case highlights the rare but significant occurrence of iatrogenic CS secondary to prolonged use of intranasal betamethasone. Although oral corticosteroids are well-known to cause HPA axis suppression, INS is generally considered safer owing to their localized effects and lowering systemic absorption side effects. However, the associated potential of systemic absorption in INS remains a concern [13]. As demonstrated in this case, prolonged use of potent formulations such as betamethasone can lead to significant systemic effects, particularly when administered inappropriately or at high doses.

Betamethasone nasal drops, although effective for treating nasal congestion and inflammation [14, 15], carry a potential risk of systemic absorption through the nasal mucosa. Factors, such as prolonged use [6, 16, 17], and high potency [18], can significantly increase systemic bioavailability. R. J. Perry et al. [19] in study of seven children highlights that even patients receiving doses within conventional safety ranges may exhibit varying sensitivity to glucocorticoids, leading to symptomatic adrenal suppression or glucocorticoid excess. Unlike newer corticosteroid compounds, such as fluticasone or mometasone, which undergo extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver, betamethasone exhibits minimal hepatic metabolism, contributing to its prolonged systemic activity [20, 21]. This pharmacokinetic profile underscores the need for careful regulation and monitoring of its use, even in ostensibly localized therapies.

The clinical manifestations in this patient, including central obesity, striae, hirsutism, and mood changes, were classic features of CS and guided the diagnostic process [22]. Scutelnicu et al. [23] reported a case of a patient in the second trimester of pregnancy who, owing to chronic sinusitis, underwent intranasal betamethasone spray therapy. The patient manifested extensive striae on the lower limbs, as well as edema in the legs, arms, and face, accompanied by a weight gain of 22 kg over 3 months. After switching the patient’s treatment to an alpha-1 adrenergic agonist spray, the condition was managed uneventfully without any symptoms of adrenal insufficiency.

Requesting imaging assessments, including a CT scan and MRI, as a first step further complicated the diagnostic process. This highlights a common diagnostic pitfall: the use of imaging as an initial approach can lead to the discovery of incidentalomas, which may misdirect clinical attention. Such findings risk overshadowing the primary etiology of the condition, potentially resulting in misdiagnosis or delayed treatment. This emphasizes the importance of prioritizing functional assessments over imaging in the early diagnostic workup to avoid unwarranted diagnostic confusion and ensure accurate identification of the underlying pathology.

Management involved the immediate cessation of betamethasone nasal drops and initiation of a structured tapering regimen with prednisolone to support adrenal recovery. The importance of stress-dose precautions during intercurrent illnesses was emphasized, alongside comprehensive patient education to prevent future misuse of corticosteroids. The gradual improvement in adrenal function during follow-up highlights the reversibility of glucocorticoid-induced adrenal suppression with appropriate intervention.

Conclusion

This case underscores several critical lessons. First, it emphasizes the importance of heightened awareness among healthcare providers regarding the potential systemic effects of topical corticosteroids, particularly potent formulations such as betamethasone. Second, it highlights the need for thorough history-taking and detailed patient education to prevent corticosteroid misuse. This report contributes to the limited body of literature on iatrogenic CS from intranasal corticosteroids, particularly in adults. Documenting the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and successful management of this case, provides valuable insights into preventing, recognizing, and treating similar cases. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between therapeutic benefit and potential harm in corticosteroid therapy and advocates for ongoing research to establish safer prescribing practices.

Data availability

The data analyzed and generated in this study can be accessed through the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CS:
Cushing’s syndrome
INS:
Intranasal corticosteroids
HPA axis:
Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis
BMI:
Body mass index
FGS:
Ferriman–Gallwey Score
PCO:
Polycystic ovary
ACTH:
Adrenocorticotropic hormone
CT:
Computed tomography
MRI:
Magnetic resonance imaging
ENT:
Ear, nose, and throat
MDD:
Major depressive disorder

References

  1. Cristante J, Chabre O. Factitious, or iatrogenic but unexpected Cushing’s syndrome. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2023;84(3):370–2.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):913–27.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scutelnicu A, Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu AM, Gica N, Botezatu R, Peltecu G, et al. Iatrogenic cushing’s syndrome as a consequence of nasal use of betamethasone spray during pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol. 2020;16(4):511–7.

    CAS Google Scholar

  4. Sakamoto M, Morita K, Okamura E, Uchino T, Okamoto K, Ozawa Y, et al. A case of iatrogenic cushing syndrome due to overuse of nasal steriod and concurrent administration of clarithromycin. Teikyo Med J. 2018;41(4):161–8.

    Google Scholar

  5. Nutting CM, Page SR. Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome due to nasal betamethasone: a problem not to be sniffed at! Postgrad Med J. 1995;71(834):231–2.

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  6. Stevens DJ. Cushing’s syndrome due to the abuse of betamethasone nasal drops. J Laryngol Otol. 1988;102(3):219–21.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dow A, Yu R, Carmichael J. Too little or too much corticosteroid? Coexisting adrenal insufficiency and Cushing’s syndrome from chronic, intermittent use of intranasal betamethasone. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2013;2013:13–0036.

    Google Scholar

  8. Bachert C, Desrosiers MY, Hellings PW, Laidlaw TM. The role of biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(3):1099–106.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bachert C, Han JK, Wagenmann M, Hosemann W, Lee SE, Backer V, et al. EUFOREA expert board meeting on uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and biologics: definitions and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(1):29–36.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Quddusi S, Browne P, Toivola B, Hirsch IB. Cushing syndrome due to surreptitious glucocorticoid administration. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(3):294–6.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Grayson JW, Harvey RJ. Topical corticosteroid irrigations in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019;9(S1):S9–15.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Global Adv Health Med. 2013;2(5):38–43.

    Google Scholar

  13. McDonnell J, Weller K, Pien LC. Safety of intranasal steroids: an updated perspective. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020;20(11):69.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Scadding GK. Other anti-inflammatory uses of intranasal corticosteroids in upper respiratory inflammatory diseases. Allergy. 2000;55(s62):19–23.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Chong LY, Head K, Hopkins C, Philpott C, Burton MJ, Schilder AG. Different types of intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4(4):Cd011993.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Findlay CA, Macdonald JF, Wallace AM, Geddes N, Donaldson MD. Childhood Cushing’s syndrome induced by betamethasone nose drops, and repeat prescriptions. BMJ. 1998;317(7160):739–40.

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  17. Reynolds C, Agrawal P, McCann A, O’Sullivan T, Chroinin MN, O’Riordan SMP. Cushing syndrome and adrenal insufficiency induced by high dose prolonged intranasal betamethasone. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104:A275.

    Google Scholar

  18. Oluwayemi IO, Oduwole AO, Oyenusi E, Onyiriuka AN, Abdullahi M, Fakeye-Udeogu OB, et al. Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome in children following nasal steroid. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17:237.

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  19. Perry RJ, Findlay CA, Donaldson MDC. Cushing’s syndrome, growth impairment, and occult adrenal suppression associated with intranasal steroids. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87(1):45–8.

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  20. Matera MG, Rinaldi B, Calzetta L, Rogliani P, Cazzola M. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled corticosteroids for asthma treatment. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2019;58: 101828.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Krzyzanski W, Milad MA, Jobe AH, Peppard T, Bies RR, Jusko WJ. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of intramuscular and oral dexamethasone and betamethasone in Indian women. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2021;48(2):261–72.

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  22. Savas M, Mehta S, Agrawal N, van Rossum EFC, Feelders RA. Approach to the patient: diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(11):3162–74.

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  23. Scutelnicu A, Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu AM, Gica N, Botezatu R, Peltecu G, et al. Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome as a consequence of nasal use of betamethasone spray during pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2020;16(4):511–7.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammadsadra Shamohammadi

  2. M.D., Endocrinologist Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences at Rasool Akram General Hospital, Tehran, Iran

    Delaram Eskandari

  3. Professor of Endocrinology Department of Endocrinology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Amir Ziaee

  4. Assistant Professor of Endocrinology & Metabolism Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital Iran University of Medical Sciences Medical Doctor at Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Seyed Hossein Samadanifard

  5. Assistant Professor of Endocrinology & Metabolism Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Haleh Chehrehgosha

  6. M.D., Endocrinologist Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences at Rasool Akram General Hospital, Tehran, Iran

    Amir Hossein Ghanooni

Contributions

MS and DE wrote the original draft; AZ and SHS collected the data. DE and HC were the patient’s doctors; MS and AHG reviewed, edited, and supervised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delaram Eskandari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences under approval number IR.IUMS.REC.1404.208.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Filed under: adrenal crisis, Cushing's, Rare Diseases | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Therapeutic Options for the Prevention of Thromboses in Cushing’s Syndrome

Posted on May 26, 2025 by MaryO

Abstract

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome, or hypercortisolism, occurs after prolonged exposure to excess cortisol, and can be characterized by moon facies, central fat redistribution, proximal limb muscle weakness and wasting, and abdominal striae. Medical literature points to a relationship between hypercortisolism and hypercoagulability, with higher rates of venous thromboembolism noted. Current guidelines recommend prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), but there is little evidence to support LMWH over other forms of anticoagulation.

Methods

We utilized TriNetX US Collaborative Network (TriNetX, LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) to investigate the efficacy of different forms of anticoagulation in patients with hypercortisolism, defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Adult patients with hypercortisolism and prescribed enoxaparin, a form of LMWH, were compared to patients with hypercortisolism prescribed unfractionated heparin, warfarin, apixaban, and aspirin at 81 mg. Groups were propensity-matched according to age at index event, sex, race, ethnicity, and comorbid conditions. The outcomes studied included pulmonary embolism (PE), upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UE DVT), lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LE DVT), superficial venous thrombosis (superficial VT), bleeding, transfusion, and all-cause mortality.

Results

No significant differences in outcomes were noted between enoxaparin and heparin, warfarin, or apixaban in patients with hypercortisolism of any cause. Uniquely, the enoxaparin cohort had significantly higher risk of PE, LE DVT, and all-cause mortality compared to the aspirin 81 mg cohort (PE: hazard ratio (HR) 1.697, 95%CI 1.444-1.994, p=0.0345; LE DVT: HR 1.492, 95%CI 1.28-1.738, p=0.0017; mortality: HR 1.272, 95%CI 1.167-1.386, p=0.0002). With further sub-analysis of pituitary-dependent (Cushing’s Disease), enoxaparin continued to demonstrate a higher risk for LE DVT (HR 1.677, 95%CI 1.353-2.079, p=0.0081), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.597, 95%CI 1.422-1.794, p=0.0005).

Conclusion

Although LMWH is currently recommended as the gold standard for anticoagulation in patients with hypercortisolism, our evidence suggests that low-dose antiplatelets such as aspirin 81 mg could outperform it. Further research is warranted to confirm and replicate our findings.

Introduction

Cortisol is produced within the zona fasciculata of the adrenal cortex and is typically released under stress [1]. Cushing’s Syndrome, first defined in 1912 by American neurosurgeon Harvey Cushing, is a state of prolonged hypercortisolism, presenting with classic phenotypic manifestations, including moon facies, central fat deposition, proximal limb muscle weakness and muscle wasting, and abdominal striae [2]. Cushing’s syndrome can be exogenous (medication-induced/iatrogenic) or endogenous (ectopic adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), pituitary-dependent, or adrenal adenoma/carcinoma) [3]. Pituitary adenomas causing ACTH-dependent cortisol excess account for 80% of endogenous cases of Cushing’s Syndrome and are more specifically termed Cushing’s Disease [4]. Overall, however, the most common cause of Cushing’s Syndrome is iatrogenic, from exogenous corticosteroid administration [5].

Hypercortisolism has also been demonstrated to affect coagulation, though the mechanism is unclear [6]. Both venous thromboemboli and pulmonary emboli rates are increased among these patients [7]. The Endocrine Society Guidelines for Treatment of Cushing Syndrome describe altered coagulation profiles that take up to one year to normalize [8]. As a result, limited guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation in Cushing syndrome; while low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the gold standard, there is little evidence behind this recommendation [9]. Furthermore, few studies assessed individual Cushing’s Syndrome subtypes and associated clotting risks or anticoagulation impact. It is currently unknown whether the antagonistic effects of cortisol will be augmented or hindered by anticoagulation other than LMWH.

This retrospective multicenter study aimed to address this paucity in data by analyzing differences among various forms of anticoagulation. Patients with Cushing syndrome who were on one of three common anticoagulants, or aspirin, were compared to patients with Cushing’s Syndrome on enoxaparin, an LMWH considered the gold standard for prophylaxis in this population. Primary objectives included end-points concerning thromboses (such as pulmonary embolism (PE), upper and lower extremity deep vein thromboses (DVTs), and superficial venous thrombosis (VT)). Secondary objectives included analyzing safety profiles (bleeding, transfusion requirements, and all-cause mortality).

Materials & Methods

Eligibility criteria

TriNetX Global Collaborative network (TriNetX, LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States), a nationwide database of de-identified health data across multiple large healthcare organizations (HCOs), was utilized to compile patients according to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes (Figure 1).

Flow-chart-for-inclusion-and-exclusion-criteria-for-the-study
Figure 1: Flow chart for inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study

PE: pulmonary embolism; VT: venous thrombosis; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; UE: upper extremity; LE: lower extremity

ICD-10 codes included those related to Cushing’s Syndrome and one of five studied medications: enoxaparin, heparin, apixaban, warfarin, and aspirin, included in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. ICD-10 codes also included those related to outcomes, including PE, upper extremity (UE) DVT, lower extremity (LE) DVT, superficial VT, bleeding, transfusion, and all-cause mortality (Table 3). Measures of association involved calculating risk differences and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the proportion of patients experiencing each outcome across cohorts.

Cushing’s Syndrome Type ICD-10 Code
Cushing Syndrome (unspecified) Drug-Induced Cushing Syndrome (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.2)
Other Cushing Syndrome (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.8)
Cushing Syndrome, Unspecified (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.9)
Pituitary-Dependent Cushing Disease (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.0)
Cushing Syndrome (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24)
Ectopic ACTH Syndrome (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.3)
Cushing Syndrome (pituitary) Pituitary-Dependent Cushing Disease (UMLS:ICD10CM:E24.0  )
Table 1: International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes utilized to identify patients with Cushing Syndrome in the TriNetX database
Medication ICD-10 Code
Enoxaparin NLM:RXNORM:67108
Warfarin NLM:RXNORM:11289
Heparin NLM:RXNORM:5224
Apixaban NLM:RXNORM:1364430
Aspirin NLM:RXNORM:1191
Table 2: International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes utilized to identify anticoagulants and antiplatelets studied in the TriNetX database
Outcome ICD-10 Codes
Pulmonary Embolism Pulmonary Embolism UMLS:ICD10CM:I26
Upper Extremity DVT Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of unspecified upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.629
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of unspecified upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.729
Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.621
Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of left upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.622
Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of upper extremity, bilateral UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.623
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.721
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of left upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.722
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of upper extremity, bilateral UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.723
Lower Extremity DVT Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.409
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.509
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.50
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity, bilateral UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.503
Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.40
Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.402
Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.401
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.502
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.501
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of left femoral vein UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.512
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of right femoral vein UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.511
Acute embolism and thrombosis of right iliac vein UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.421
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of femoral vein, bilateral UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.513
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified distal lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.5Z9
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified tibial vein UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.549
Acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.4
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.5
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of other specified deep vein of unspecified lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.599
Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified proximal lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.4Y9
Superficial VT Embolism and thrombosis of superficial veins of unspecified lower extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.819
Acute embolism and thrombosis of superficial veins of unspecified upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.619
Chronic embolism and thrombosis of superficial veins of unspecified upper extremity UMLS:ICD10CM:I82.719
Bleeding Hematemesis UMLS:ICD10CM:K92.0
Hemoptysis UMLS:ICD10CM:R04.2
Hemorrhage from respiratory passages UMLS:ICD10CM:R04
Hemorrhage from other sites in respiratory passages UMLS:ICD10CM:R04.8
Hemorrhage from other sites in respiratory passages UMLS:ICD10CM:R04.89
Melena UMLS:ICD10CM:K92.1
Hemorrhage of anus and rectum UMLS:ICD10CM:K62.5
Epistaxis UMLS:ICD10CM:R04.0
Transfusion Transfusion of Nonautologous Whole Blood into Peripheral Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30233H1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Whole Blood into Central Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30243H1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Red Blood Cells into Peripheral Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30233N1
Transfusion, blood or blood components UMLS:CPT:36430
Transfusion of Nonautologous Red Blood Cells into Central Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30243N1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Frozen Red Cells into Peripheral Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30233P1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Red Blood Cells into Peripheral Artery, Percutaneous Approach (deprecated 2020) UMLS:ICD10PCS:30253N1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Frozen Red Cells into Central Vein, Percutaneous Approach UMLS:ICD10PCS:30243P1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Red Blood Cells into Central Artery, Percutaneous Approach (deprecated 2020) UMLS:ICD10PCS:30263N1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Frozen Red Cells into Peripheral Artery, Percutaneous Approach (deprecated 2020) UMLS:ICD10PCS:30253P1
Transfusion of Nonautologous Frozen Red Cells into Central Artery, Percutaneous Approach (deprecated 2020) UMLS:ICD10PCS:30263P1
Transfusion of blood product UMLS:SNOMED:116859006
Transfusion of red blood cells UMLS:SNOMED:116863004
Mortality Deceased Deceased (demographic)
Table 3: International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes utilized to identify outcomes followed in the TriNetX database

DVT: Deep Venous Thrombosis; VT: Venous Thrombosis

Cohort definitions

For each medication listed, two cohorts were compared: (i) a cohort of patients with hypercortisolism on enoxaparin and (ii) a cohort of patients with hypercortisolism on heparin, warfarin, apixaban, or aspirin at 81 mg (Table 4). The cohorts strictly assessed only adult patients (defined as at least 18 years of age); pediatric patients were not analyzed.

Cohort Run
Enoxaparin 146 HCOs with 99 providers responding with 12,885 patients
Heparin 145 HCOs with 97 providers responding with 16,376 patients
Warfarin 145 HCOs with 82 providers responding with 3,230 patients
Apixaban 146 HCOs with 91 providers responding with 3,982 patients
Aspirin (81 mg) 144 HCOs with 51 providers responding with 8,200 patients
Table 4: Outputs of healthcare organization queries as defined in corresponding tables

HCO: Healthcare Organization

Statistical analysis

Index events and time windows were defined to analyze patient outcomes. The index event was defined as the first date a patient met the inclusion criteria for a cohort. The time window was defined as the five years after the index event during which a pre-defined outcome could occur. Outcomes of interest were identified using ICD-10 codes as outlined in Table 1, and included PE, UE DVT, LE DVT, superficial VT, bleeding, transfusion, and all-cause mortality. Cohorts were propensity score-matched 1:1 according to age at index event, sex, race and ethnicity, and comorbid conditions, including endocrine, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary conditions (Table 5). Propensity score-matching was performed using TriNetX, with a greedy (nearest) neighbor matching algorithm (caliper of 0.1 pooled standard deviations).

Variable ICD-10 Code
Demographics Age at Index (AI)
Female (F)
Black/African American (2054-5)
Male (M)
White (2106-3)
American Indian/Alaskan Native (1002-5)
Unknown Race (UNK)
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander (2076-8)
Unknown Gender (UN)
Not Hispanic/Latino (2186-5)
Hispanic/Latino (2135-2)
Other Race (2131-1)
Asian (2028-9)
Diagnosis Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (E00-E89)
Factors influencing health status and contact with health services (Z00-Z99)
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue (M00-M99)
Diseases of the circulatory system (I00-I99)
Diseases of the digestive system (K00-K95)
Diseases of the nervous system (G00-G99)
Diseases of the respiratory system (J00-J99)
Diseases of the genitourinary system (N00-N99)
Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism (D50-D89)
Neoplasms (C00-D49)
Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (L00-L99)
Table 5: International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes utilized to propensity match cohorts in the TriNetX database

Three analytical approaches were performed for this study, including measures of association, survival analysis, and frequency analysis. The measure of association analysis involved calculating RRs (and risk differences) with 95%CIs, comparing the proportion of patients across each cohort experiencing an outcome. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier estimators (evaluating time-to-event outcomes), with Log-Rank testing incorporated to compare the survival curves. Furthermore, Cox proportional hazard models were incorporated to provide an estimate of the hazard ratios (HR) and 95%CIs. Patients who exited a cohort before the end of the time window were excluded from the survival analysis. The frequency analysis was performed by calculating the proportion of patients in each cohort who experienced an outcome during the defined period of five years.

For statistically significant associations, an E-value was calculated to assess the potential impact of unmeasured confounders, quantifying the minimum strength of association that would be required by an unmeasured confounder to explain the observed effect (beyond our measured covariates); an E-value of above 2.0 was considered modestly robust, and above 3 was considered strongly robust. Additionally, a limited sensitivity analysis assessing Pituitary Cushing’s (the most common cause of endogenous Cushing’s Syndrome) was performed. All analyses were conducted through TriNetX, with statistical significance defined as a p-value < 0.05.

Results

Cushing’s syndrome, unspecified

Enoxaparin and Heparin

After propensity-score matching, 8,658 patients were identified in each cohort. The average age at index event for the enoxaparin cohort was 54.5 + 16.5 years, compared to 53.1 + 17.3 years for the heparin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 6,216 females (71.8%), compared to 6,000 (69.3%) in the heparin cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 6035 (69.7%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 987 (11.4%) African American patients, 753 (8.7%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 216 (2.5%) Asian patients. The heparin cohort was similar in ethnicity, with 5,800 (67.0%) Caucasian patients, 1,099 (12.7%) African American patients, 753 (8.7%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 268 (3.1%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin and heparin cohorts demonstrated no significant differences in PE (HR 1.171, 95%CI 1.017-1.348, p=0.1797), UE DVT (HR 1.067, 95%CI 0.837-1.362, p=0.8051), LE DVT (HR 1.066, 95%CI 0.931-1.222, p=0.1922), superficial VT (HR 0.974, 95%CI 0.672-1.41, p=0.4576), bleeding (HR 0.948, 95%CI 0.855-1.05, p=0.3547), transfusion (HR 0.873, 95%CI 0.786-0.969, p=0.1767), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.036, 95%CI 0.966-1.11, p=0.9954). A comprehensive summary of the results is demonstrated in Table 6.

p-value Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT S VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 0.1797 0.8051 0.1922 0.4576 0.3547 0.1767 0.9954
enoxaparin warfarin 0.3828 0.6 0.1963 0.0995 0.7768 0.5715 0.15
enoxaparin apixaban 0.6491 0.6275 0.723 0.4198 0.4356 0.4299 0.2628
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 0.0345 0.587 0.0017 0.4218 0.246 0.2057 0.0002
– – – – – – – – – –
HR Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT S VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 1.171 1.067 1.066 0.974 0.948 0.873 1.036
enoxaparin warfarin 0.936 0.969 0.708 0.655 0.961 1.127 1.042
enoxaparin apixaban 0.798 0.666 0.684 4.059 0.933 1.089 1.041
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 1.697 1.398 1.492 1.718 1.107 1.347 1.272
– – – – – – – – – –
95% CIs Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT Superficial VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 1.017-1.348 0.837-1.362 0.931-1.222 0.672-1.41 0.855-1.05 0.786-0.969 0.966-1.11
enoxaparin warfarin 0.755-1.161 0.692-1.356 0.583-0.859 0.376-1.142 0.812-1.137 0.95-1.336 0.93-1.167
enoxaparin apixaban 0.608-1.047 0.431-1.03 0.593-0.788 1.156-14.258 0.771-1.129 0.892-1.33 0.912-1.189
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 1.444-1.994 1.06-1.845 1.28-1.738 1.011-2.92 0.986-1.243 1.185-1.532 1.167-1.386
Table 6: Hazard Ratio, 95% Confidence Intervals and p-values for anticoagulation and antiplatelet comparisons in all causes of Cushing’s Syndrome

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; PE: pulmonary embolism; VT: venous thrombosis; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; UE: upper extremity; LE: lower extremity

Enoxaparin and Warfarin

After propensity-score matching, 2,786 patients were identified in each cohort. The average age at index event for the enoxaparin cohort was 54.8 + 16.4 years, compared to 58.9 + 15.9 years for the warfarin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 2,020 female patients (72.5%) compared to 1,861 (66.8%) in the warfarin cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 2,000 (71.8%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 334 (12.0%) African American patients, 220 (7.98%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 64 (2.3%) Asian patients. The warfarin cohort was similar, with 2,056 (73.8%) Caucasian patients, 312 (11.2%) African American patients, 170 (6.1%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 92 (3.3%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin and warfarin cohorts demonstrated no significant differences in PE (HR 0.936, 95%CI 0.755-1.161, p=0.3828), UE DVT (HR 0.969, 95%CI 0.692-1.356, p=0.6), LE DVT (HR 0.708, 95%CI 0.583-0.859, p=0.1963), superficial VT (HR 0.655, 95%CI 0.376-1.142, p=0.0995), bleeding (HR 0.961, 95%CI 0.812-1.137, p=0.7768), transfusion (HR 1.127, 95%CI 0.95-1.336, p=0.5715), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.042, 95%CI 0.93-1.167, p=0.15) (Table 6).

Enoxaparin and Apixaban

After propensity-score matching, 2,429 patients were identified in each cohort. The average age at index event for the enoxaparin cohort was 54.6 + 16.4 years, compared to 61.2 + 15.2 years for the apixaban cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 1,746 female patients (71.9%) compared to 1,571 (64.7%) in the apixaban cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 1632 (67.2%) were Caucasian patients, 318 (13.1%) African American patients, 219 (9.0%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 68 (2.8%) Asian patients. A similar composition was noted in the apixaban cohort, with 1,683 (69.3%) Caucasian patients, 321 (13.2%) African American patients, 141 (5.8%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 53 (2.2%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin and apixaban cohorts demonstrated no significant differences in PE (HR 0.798, 95%CI 0.608-1.047, p=0.6491), UE DVT (HR 0.666, 95%CI 0.431-1.03, p=0.6275), LE DVT (HR 0.684, 95%CI 0.593-0.788, p=0.723), superficial VT (HR 4.059, 95%CI 1.156-14.258, p=0.4198), bleeding (HR 0.933, 95%CI 0.771-1.129, p=0.4356), transfusion (HR 1.089, 95%CI 0.892-1.33, p=0.4299), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.041, 95%CI 0.912-1.189, p=0.2628) (Table 6).

Enoxaparin and Aspirin 81 mg

After propensity-score matching, 6,433 patients were identified in each cohort. The average age at index event for the enoxaparin cohort was 54.5 + 16.6 years, compared to the aspirin 81 mg cohort at 58.8 + 14.9 years. The enoxaparin cohort had 4664 female patients (72.5%) compared to 4,445 (69.1%) in the aspirin 81 mg cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 4,522 (70.3%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 766 (11.9%) African American patients, 521 (8.1%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 193 (3.0%) Asian patients. Similar demographics were noted within the Aspirin 81 mg cohort, with 4,670 (72.6%) Caucasian patients, 817 (12.7%) African American patients, 425 (6.6%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 167 (2.6%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin cohort demonstrated a significantly higher risk of PE (HR 1.697, 95%CI 1.444-1.994, p=0.0345), LE DVT (HR 1.492, 95%CI 1.28-1.738, p=0.0017), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.272, 95%CI 1.167-1.386, p=0.0002) compared to the aspirin 81 mg cohort (Figure 2). There was no significant difference in rates of UE DVT (HR 1.398, 95%CI 1.06-1.845, p=0.587), superficial VT (HR 1.718, 95%CI 1.011-2.92, p=0.4268), bleeding (HR 1.107, 95%CI 0.986-1.243, p=0.246), or transfusion (HR 1.347, 95%CI 1.185-1.532, p=0.2057) (Table 6). Due to a significant difference between enoxaparin and Aspirin 81 mg, an E-value was calculated for PE (E-value = 2.783), LE DVT (E-value = 2.348), and all-cause mortality (E-value = 1.860).

Kaplan-Meier-survival-curve-for-pituitary-Cushing's-subtype-(mortality,-LE-DVT,-and-PE)
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier survival curve for pituitary Cushing’s subtype (mortality, LE DVT, and PE)

(A) Mortality of enoxaparin compared to aspirin 81mg (HR 1.272, 95% CI 1.167-1.386, p=0.0002); (B) LE DVT risk with enoxaparin compared to aspirin 81 mg (HR 1.492, 95%CI 1.28-1.738, p=0.0017); (C) PE risk with enoxaparin compared to aspirin 81 mg (HR: 1.697, 95%CI 1.444-1.994, p=0.0345)

DVT: deep vein thrombosis; LE: lower extremity; PE: pulmonary embolism

Pituitary hypercortisolism (Cushing’s disease)

Enoxaparin and Heparin

Propensity-score matching identified 5,602 patients per cohort. The average age at index for the enoxaparin cohort was 53.9 + 16.7 years, compared to 53.7 + 16.9 years in the heparin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 4,088 female patients (72.97%) compared to 4,066 (72.58%) in the heparin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort was predominantly Caucasian patients (n=3,948; 70.47%), followed by 641 (11.45%) African American patients, 424 (7.57%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 139 (2.48%) Asian patients. The heparin cohort was also predominantly Caucasian (n=3,947; 70.46%), followed by 669 (11.94%) African American patients, 401 (7.16%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 148 (2.64%) Asian patients. There were no significant differences in rates of PE (HR 1.208, 95%CI 1.007 – 1.451, p=0.5803), UE DVT (HR 1.156, 95%CI 0.841 – 1.59, p=0.6863), LE DVT (HR 1.246, 95%CI 1.063 – 1.46, p=0.8996), superficial VT (HR 1.347, 95%CI 0.874 – 2.075, p=0.3731), bleeding (HR 0.916, 95%CI 0.809 – 1.037, p=0.1578), transfusion (HR 0.912, 95%CI 0.798 – 1.042, p=2119), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.935 – 1.112, p=0.8734). A comprehensive summary of the results is demonstrated in Table 7.

p-value Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT Superficial VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 0.5189 0.2468 0.7586 0.7708 0.5894 0.6273 0.8433
enoxaparin warfarin 0.4842 0.7763 0.9651 0.682 0.1996 0.5309 0.399
enoxaparin apixaban 0.1047 0.0423 0.647 0.4824 0.2698 0.1122 0.1044
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 0.9651 0.6358 0.8448 0.9765 0.1167 0.4854 0.5001
– – – – – – – – – –
HR Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT Superficial VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 1.186 1.332 1.232 1.183 0.876 0.963 1.016
enoxaparin warfarin 0.804 0.76 0.688 0.815 1.008 1.009 0.976
enoxaparin apixaban 0.875 0.761 0.954 3.068 1.084 1.359 1.115
enoxaparin aspirin 81 mg 1.173 1.157 1.226 1.165 0.908 0.915 1.028
– – – – – – – – – –
95% CIs Medication 1 Medication 2 PE UE DVT LE DVT Superficial VT Bleeding Transfusion Mortality
enoxaparin heparin 0.983-1.433 0.941-1.885 1.032-1.47 0.776-1.803 0.769-0.998 0.808-1.147 0.929-1.112
enoxaparin warfarin 0.612-1.055 0.467-1.235 0.539-0.877 0.447-1.489 0.816-1.246 0.76-1.34 0.843-1.13
enoxaparin apixaban 0.659-1.162 0.456-1.271 0.736-1.236 0.843-11.166 0.845-1.381 0.962-1.921 0.944-1.317
enoxaparin aspirin 81mg 0.969-1.419 0.827-1.619 1.03-1.46 0.763-1.78 0.797-1.035 0.772-1.085 0.938-1.127
Table 7: Hazard ratio, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values for anticoagulation and antiplatelet comparisons in pituitary Cushing’s syndrome

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; PE: pulmonary embolism; VT: venous thrombosis; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; UE: upper extremity; LE: lower extremity

Enoxaparin and Warfarin

Propensity-score matching was performed with 1,694 patients per cohort identified. The average age at index for the enoxaparin cohort was 58.1 + 15.8 years, compared to 58.1 + 15.9 years in the warfarin cohort. The enoxaparin cohort had 1,142 female patients (67.41%) compared to 1,143 (67.47%) in the warfarin cohort. Within the enoxaparin cohort, 1,224 (72.2%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 194 (11.45%) African American patients, 97 (5.73%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 57 (3.37%) Asian patients. The warfarin cohort had similar demographics, with 1,223 (72.2%) Caucasian patients, followed by 194 (11.45%) African American patients, 102 (6.02%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 65 (3.84%) Asian patients. There were no significant differences in rates of PE (HR 0.907, 95%CI 0.694 – 1.186, p=0.8117), UE DVT (HR 0.988, 95%CI 0.628 – 1.555, p=0.9848), LE DVT (HR 0.739, 95%CI 0.589 – 0.929, p=0.4445), superficial VT (HR 0.815, 95%CI 0.44 – 1.511, p=0.8098), bleeding (HR 1.001, 95%CI 0.814 – 1.231, p=0.0987), transfusion (HR 1.106, 95%CI 0.889 – 1.376, p=0.4904), or all-cause mortality (HR 0.951, 95%CI 0.83 – 1.089, p=0.1656) (Table 7).

Enoxaparin and Apixaban

Propensity-score matching identified 1,489 patients per cohort. The enoxaparin cohort was 61.1 + 15.1 years old at the index event, versus the apixaban cohort at 61.4 + 14.9 years. The enoxaparin cohort had 1,054 (70.79%) female patients compared with 1,029 (69.11%) in the apixaban cohort. The enoxaparin cohort was primarily Caucasian patients (n=1,105; 74.21%), followed by 179 (12.02%) African American patients, 74 (4.97%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 27 (1.81%) Asian patients. The apixaban cohort demonstrated similar demographics with 1,080 (72.53%) Caucasian patients, followed by 180 (12.09%) African American patients, 76 (5.1%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 27 (1.81%) Asian patients. There were no significant differences in rates of PE (HR 0.949, 95%CI 0.673 – 1.339, p=0.4372), UE DVT (HR 0.832, 95%CI 0.472 – 1.466, p=0.1538), LE DVT (HR 1.166, 95%CI 0.869 – 1.566, p=0.8595), superficial VT (HR 5.323, 95%CI 1.19 – 23.815, p=0.493), bleeding (HR 1.218, 95%CI 0.948 – 1.565, p=0.4021), transfusion (HR 1.319, 95%CI 0.993 – 1.753, p=0.1663), or all-cause mortality (HR 1.131, 95%CI 0.966 – 1.325, p=0.0839) (Table 7).

Enoxaparin and Aspirin 81 mg

Propensity-score matching revealed 3,475 patients per cohort. The enoxaparin cohort was 58.8 + 15.3 years at index event, compared to the aspirin cohort at 58.2 + 14.3 years. The enoxaparin cohort had 2,438 (70.16%) female patients compared to the aspirin cohort with 2,445 (70.36%). Within the enoxaparin cohort, 2,539 (73.06%) were Caucasian patients, followed by 378 (10.88%) African American patients, 182 (5.24%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 74 (2.13%) Asian patients. The aspirin cohort demonstrated similar demographics with 2,554 (73.5%) Caucasian patients, followed by 363 (10.45%) African American patients, 196 (5.64%) Hispanic/Latino patients, and 68 (1.96%) Asian patients. The enoxaparin cohort demonstrated significantly increased risk of LE DVT (HR 1.677, 95%CI 1.353 – 2.079, p=0.0081) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.597, 95%CI 1.422 – 1.794, p=0.0005) (Figure 3). There were no significant differences in rates of PE (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.354 – 2.236, p=0.2408), UE DVT (HR 1.773, 95%CI 1.108 – 2.837, p=0.8625), superficial VT (HR 4.273, 95%CI 1.969 – 9.273, p=0.5196), bleeding (HR 1.093, 95%CI 0.937 – 1.275, p=0.8554), or transfusion (HR 1.896, 95%CI 1.556 – 2.311, p=0.2609) (Table 7). Due to a significant difference between enoxaparin and Aspirin 81 mg, an E-value was calculated for LE DVT (E-value = 2.744) and all-cause mortality (E-value = 2.574).

Kaplan-Meier-survival-curve-for-pituitary-Cushing's-subtype-(mortality-and-LE-DVT)
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier survival curve for pituitary Cushing’s subtype (mortality and LE DVT)

(A) Mortality of enoxaparin compared to aspirin 81 mg (HR 1.597, 95%CI 1.422-1.794, p=0.0005); (B) LE DVT of enoxaparin compared to aspirin 81 mg (HR 1.677, 95%CI: 1.353-2.079, p=0.0081)

HR: hazard ration; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; LE: lower extremity

Discussion

The concept of hypercoagulability in the setting of hypercortisolemia has been documented since the 1970s [10]. Estimates suggest an 18-fold risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with Cushing’s syndrome compared to the general population [11]. Furthermore, venous thromboembolism accounts for up to 11% of all deaths in Cushing’s syndrome [12]. Patients are often noted to have a “coagulation paradox” in Cushing’s syndrome, whereby there is a heightened risk for thrombosis, with concurrent bruising of the skin; thromboembolism is due to an imbalance between pro- and anti-coagulant pathways, whereas bruising is due to atrophy of the skin and capillary fragility [11]. As noted by Feelders and Nieman, two prominent phases for the development of thromboembolic events include the untreated (active) hypercortisolemia and the postoperative phases [11]. Population-based studies have demonstrated a heightened risk for venous thromboembolism prior to diagnosis (in some studies as early as three years before diagnosis) [9].

Despite this heightened risk for venous thromboembolic events, there appears to be a lack of awareness amongst institutions (and individual practitioners), along with improper management. Fleseriu and colleagues, however, do note that in 2020, the awareness of hypercoagulability in Cushing’s syndrome increased around fourfold in two years, with routine prophylaxis increasing to 75% (from 50%) perioperatively (however, most patients only received prophylaxis for up to two weeks postoperatively) [13]. Another survey was performed by the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions, noting concerns of heterogeneity with timing, type, and duration of prophylaxis, noting most centers do not have a thromboprophylaxis protocol (identifying only one reference center had a standardized thromboprophylaxis protocol for Cushing’s syndrome) [14]. From the European survey, it was noted that prophylaxis was initiated at diagnosis in 48% of patients, with 17% preoperatively, 26% on the day before (or of) surgery, 13% postoperatively, and 9% “depending on the presentation”. With regards to discontinuation of thromboprophylaxis, in centers with a standardized protocol (35% of reference centers), 38% of centers stopped at one month post-operatively, 25% between two and four weeks, and 37% between one week before and two weeks after surgery, between four and six days postoperatively, and at three months postoperatively. When cessation was individualized (in the remaining 65% of reference centers), 60% discontinued thromboprophylaxis once the patient was mobile, 40% with achievement of remission, 27% regarding patient status, and 7% dependent upon hemostatic parameters [14].

There is limited guidance concerning thromboprophylaxis recommendations in Cushing’s syndrome. For example, the Endocrine Society merely recommends assessing the risk of thrombosis in Cushing’s syndrome and administering perioperative prophylaxis if undergoing surgery, but provides no further recommendations [8]. The Pituitary Society highlights the absence of standardized practice for both pre- and postoperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with Cushing’s syndrome [15]. There appears to only be one set of guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in Cushing’s syndrome, known as the “Delphi Panel Consensus”, which forms the basis for the guidelines from the European Society for Endocrinology [9]. The Delphi Panel Consensus recommends considering anticoagulation for all patients with Cushing’s syndrome (in the absence of contraindications), regardless of the underlying etiology, and is recommended in the presence of risk factors [9]. Moreover, thromboprophylaxis is advised to begin at the time of diagnosis [9]. Currently, there is not enough evidence to provide a recommendation for thromboprophylaxis in mild autonomous cortisol secretion [9]. As with any medical patient, thromboprophylaxis should be initiated in all patients with active Cushing’s syndrome who are hospitalized (without contraindications) [9, 15]. Apart from chemical prophylaxis, anti-embolic stockings are not recommended due to the risk of skin fragility and friability [9]. The Delphi Consensus Panel furthermore advises to continue prophylactic anticoagulation for at least three months after biochemical remission (eucortisolemia) has occurred, and note those without additional risk factors (such as obesity, immobility, prior history of venous thromboembolism, or cardiac risk factors) can be considered candidates to stop the medication; one caveat, however, is for patients medically managed with mitotane (which can alter liver function and coagulation factor metabolism), there is an increased risk of bleeding, for which careful monitoring of renal function and bleeding risk is advised [9]. The Pituitary Society provides additional recommendations, such as discontinuing estrogen therapy in women (if used for contraception) [15]. While the Delphi Consensus Panel does not comment upon pediatric patients, the Pituitary Society advises against the use of thromboprophylaxis in the pediatric population due to bleeding risks [15].

The Delphi Consensus Panel furthermore recommend considering thromboprophylaxis at the time of inferior petrosal sinus sampling (if not started before this), due to the risk of thrombosis associated with this intervention; for those who are receiving prophylaxis, it is recommended to continue throughout the procedure, however, if has not been started, it is advised to initiate 12 hours post procedure. Similarly, if thromboprophylaxis was not considered earlier in a patient’s course, it should be reconsidered in the perioperative period, with the last dose of LMWH administered 24 hours prior to surgery and reinitiated 24 hours postoperatively [9]. Isand et al. recommend continuing thromboprophylaxis for three months after cortisol levels normalize (< 5 μg/dL) and when patients can mobilize [9]. In patients for whom a venous thromboembolism develops, patients are advised to receive a therapeutic dose of anticoagulation (preferably LMWH) for three to six months, followed by prophylaxis for three months after resolution of Cushing’s syndrome [9]. The Delphi Consensus Panel provides a summary of their recommendations, shown in Figure 4.

Algorithm-for-thromboprophylaxis-in-Cushing's-syndrome
Figure 4: Algorithm for thromboprophylaxis in Cushing’s syndrome

IPSS: inferior petrosal sinus sampling; VTE: venous thromboembolism; LMWH: low-molecular-weight heparin; DOAC: direct oral anticoagulant

Source: Isand et al., 2025 [9]; Published with permission.

Although intuitively, one may expect the procoagulant profile of Cushing’s syndrome to resolve upon attainment of eucortisolemia with medical management, studies have failed to demonstrate a reduction in venous thromboembolism with medical therapy [16]. Additionally, while one may expect resolution of hypercoagulability with surgical intervention (transsphenoidal sinus surgery or adrenalectomy), the risk maintains in the postoperative period, comparable to that of orthopedic surgery, at times up to one year and beyond to normalize [17]; data from European Register on Cushing’s Syndrome (ERCUSYN) database suggest the risk is greatest six months postoperatively [18]. The estimated risk for postoperative venous thromboembolism in pituitary-dependent Cushing’s is around 4.3% (compared to 0% with a non-functional pituitary adenoma); regarding adrenal surgery, the risk is estimated at around 2.6% [11]. Although the underlying mechanism for the persistent risk for venous thromboembolism remains unknown, it is hypothesized that a sudden drop in cortisol can lead to an inflammatory response (itself activating the coagulation cascade) [16]. Lopes and colleagues note an increase in the number of lymphocytes (because of loss of Th1 cell suppression), with increases in cytokines (such as interferon-gamma, interleukin-2, and transforming growth factor-beta) [16]. Comorbidities such as osteoporosis and myopathy (from hypercortisolemia) may be associated with decreased mobility in the postoperative period, influencing the risk for thrombosis [16].

Whilst all subtypes of Cushing’s syndrome can be associated with a heightened risk for venous thromboembolism (pituitary adenoma, adrenal adenoma, medication-induced, ectopic ACTH, and adrenal carcinoma), the latter two are often associated with malignant disease, which itself poses a risk for hypercoagulability from the underlying neoplasm [11]. Patients with Cushing’s syndrome have been found to demonstrate a reduction in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), alongside increases in clot lysis time, procoagulant factors (such as factor VIII, von-Willebrand factor and fibrinogen) and fibrinolysis inhibitors (including plasminogen activator-inhibitor-1, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, and alpha-2 antiplasmin) [11,12,17]. Varlamov et al. have also noted an increase in thrombin, thromboxane A2, and platelets. Other studies have additionally demonstrated elevated proteins C and S as well as antithrombin III, which are hypothesized to be increased as a compensatory mechanism from the state of hypercoagulability [12]. Barbot et al. demonstrate elevation in factor VIII and von-Willebrand factor within the first few months after transsphenoidal sinus surgery, along with abnormally large von-Willebrand multimers (which are typically found in the cellular components), which can induce spontaneous platelet aggregation [17].

Lopes et al. note that altered von-Willebrand factor levels are not a constant feature reported in Cushing’s syndrome, and state it depends upon the polymorphism of the gene promoter, providing an example of haplotype 1 of the gene promoter conferring the greatest risk for elevated von-Willebrand factor levels by cortisol [16]. Barbot and colleagues furthermore note ABO blood groupings as an additional influencer of the procoagulant state; as an example, blood group-O patients have a near one-quarter reduction in levels of von-Willebrand factor [17]. Feelders and Nieman note heterogeneity in coagulation profiles based on individual characteristics and differing assay techniques [11]. van Haalen and colleagues note an absence of a correlation between severity of hypercortisolism and hemostatic abnormalities [14]; this is echoed by Varlamov et al., stating there is no linear relationship between coagulation parameters and venous thromboembolic events, nor with urinary free cortisol elevation [12]. Varlamov and colleagues further note that a subset of patients may have unaltered coagulation parameters, for which they advise against stratifying patients’ risk based on coagulation parameters [12].

In 2016, Zilio and colleagues posed a scoring system to stratify patients with active Cushing’s syndrome, including both clinical and biochemical parameters, including age (> 69 = 2 points), reduction in mobility (2 points), acute severe infection (1 point), prior cardiovascular event(s) (1 point), midnight plasma cortisol (> 3.15 times upper limit of normal = 1 point), and shortened aPTT (1 point) [19]. Lopes et al. describe the stratification as follows: 2 points (low risk), 3 points (moderate risk), 4 points (high risk), and > 5 points (very high risk) [16]. It should be noted, however, that Zilio et al.’s study was performed on only 176 patients and has not been validated in other studies [19]. Further drawbacks include the failure to account for postoperative events (a major source of venous thromboembolism in Cushing’s syndrome), and despite the stratification categories, no recommendations for treatment are provided.

LMWH is the first-line medication, consistent across differing societies. Despite being the gold standard, there are limited studies demonstrating a beneficial reduction in venous thromboembolic events in such cohorts; similarly, studies are lacking in analysis of the other classes of anticoagulants in head-to-head comparisons against LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in hypercortisolism. Another limitation is the fact that certain studies solely address thromboprophylaxis in the postoperative period. As an example, McCormick et al. performed one of the only trials comparing unfractionated heparin and LMWH (enoxaparin), noting no differences in hemorrhagic complications or thromboses; however, this was analyzed in patients undergoing transsphenoidal sinus surgery [10].

The current study retrospectively analyzed the various anticoagulant agents for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in Cushing’s syndrome (of any subtype), compared to the gold standard, LMWH (in this study, enoxaparin). When analyzing Cushing’s syndrome, our study demonstrated no significant differences in outcomes between enoxaparin and warfarin, apixaban, or unfractionated heparin; however, aspirin 81 mg demonstrated a lower risk of all-cause mortality, PE, and LE DVT. With subanalysis of Cushing’s disease (pituitary-related), there was no significant difference between enoxaparin and warfarin, apixaban or unfractionated heparin; aspirin 81 mg again noted a reduced all-cause mortality and LE DVT (but did not lower the risk of PE, compared with Cushing’s syndrome of all types combined). With E-value sensitivity analysis, the association remained moderately robust with PE (all Cushing’s types combined), LE DVT (all Cushing’s types and pituitary Cushing’s), and mortality (solely pituitary Cushing’s), however, mortality was weak-to-moderate with Cushing’s syndrome of all types (Table 8).

Outcome Hazard Ratio E-value Interpretation
PE (All Cushing’s Types) 1.697 2.783 Moderate
LE DVT (All Cushing’s Types) 1.492 2.348 Moderate
LE DVT (Pituitary) 1.677 2.744 Moderate
Mortality (All Cushing’s Types) 1.272 1.860 Weak
Mortality (Pituitary) 1.597 2.574 Moderate
Table 8: E-value sensitivity analyses for significant findings

DVT: deep vein thrombosis; LE: lower extremity; PE: pulmonary embolism

Aspirin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, was first identified to irreversibly inhibit platelet function in the 1950s by Dr. Lawrence Craven [20]. Data is scarce in terms of aspirin’s role in thromboprophylaxis in hypercortisolemia. In 1999, Semple and Laws Jr. initially reported the use of aspirin postoperatively for six weeks (starting postoperative day one) in patients with Cushing’s disease who underwent transsphenoidal sinus surgery; while the authors mentioned a reduction in rates of venous thromboemboli, no factual data was provided (including dose of aspirin, complications experienced, and number of venous thromboemboli before and after) [21]. In 2015, Smith et al. performed an additional study with 81 mg of aspirin again administered starting postoperative day one (alongside sequential compression devices and mobilization), reporting that none of the 82 patients developed DVTs (with only two cases of epistaxis) [22]. It was not until 1994, however, in the Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaborations’ meta-analysis, that aspirin demonstrated a reduced risk for venous thromboembolism, with similar findings replicated in the Pulmonary Embolism Prevention trial in 2000 and the WARFASA (Warfarin and Aspirin) and ASPIRE (Aspirin to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism) trials in 2012 [23]. In 2012, the American College of Chest Physicians [24,25] were the first to recommend aspirin as thromboprophylaxis following total hip or knee replacement, followed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in 2018 (advising LMWP followed by aspirin) and the American Society of Hematology in 2019 (advising either aspirin or oral anticoagulation after total hip or knee replacement) [25]. Despite recognition of the reduction in venous thromboembolism by aspirin (and its incorporation into guidelines), its role in thromboprophylaxis is largely limited to orthopedic surgery. The mechanisms of aspirin and its reduction in venous thromboembolism is not entirely understood, but believed to occur via differing mechanisms, including inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 (which reduces thromboxane A2, a promoter of platelet aggregation), prevention of thrombin formation and thrombin-mediated coagulant reactions, acetylation of proteins involved in coagulation (such as fibrinogen), and enhancing fibrinolysis [23,26].

Strengths and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, a study specifically comparing the impact of aspirin with that of LMWP in Cushing’s syndrome has not been performed; as a result, our study adds to the paucity of literature pertaining to this topic. Notable strengths in the study include a large sample size (allowing robust comparisons amongst treatment arms), incorporation of propensity-score matching (allowing for internal validity through balancing baseline comparison groups), and comprehensive measurable outcomes.

Limitations to our study are multifold, and include retrospective design, for which intrinsic biases are inherent and can affect causal inference (despite matching techniques). Furthermore, data collection (via TriNetX) relied on correct ICD-10 coding, which could be a source of potential error if conditions and medications are coded improperly, or if our queries missed ICD-10 codes that could also correspond with outcomes. Similarly, TriNetX also relies on queries of healthcare organizations, many of which may not have responded with data, which could inaccurately skew the results. Although TriNetX uses global data, the majority of patient data was derived from the United States population, which could result in less generalizable data to the global public. These findings should be interpreted within the correct context and with caution to prevent misrepresentation. Compliance was a variable that could not be controlled for. Moreover, those who had taken the medication before the index event were excluded from analysis. While aspirin 81 mg demonstrated a reduction in LE DVT and mortality in Cushing’s disease along with PE with Cushing’s syndrome, we only performed a subgroup analysis concerning pituitary-related causes of Cushing’s syndrome (Cushing’s disease); it remains unclear why the risk of PE was not reduced in the latter subgroup. Due to limitations in ICD-10 coding, further subgroup analyses were not performed (such as adrenal adenoma, adrenal adenocarcinoma, or ectopic ACTH syndrome), for which the implications of treating with aspirin 81 mg cannot be inferred from our data. Similarly, further subgroup analyses, such as gender and race, were not performed. Our study assessed adult patients with Cushing’s syndrome, and not pediatric patients, which limits the applicability of our findings to such a cohort. Further studies are required to confirm and replicate our findings in a prospective fashion, stratifying subtypes of Cushing’s Syndrome.

Conclusions

Cushing’s syndrome is associated with a heightened risk for venous thromboembolism, regardless of the underlying etiology. Currently, LMWHs such as enoxaparin remain the gold standard for both thromboprophylaxis and treatment in such patients. There is limited data to support superiority over alternative agents. Our study analyzed enoxaparin against warfarin, unfractionated heparin, and apixaban, for which there was no significant risk difference. When compared to aspirin, enoxaparin demonstrated a greater risk for the development of PE, LE DVT, and all-cause mortality. Further prospective trials are required to replicate our findings and confirm the superiority of aspirin over LMWH.

References

  1. Ulrich-Lai YM, Figueiredo HF, Ostrander MM, Choi DC, Engeland WC, Herman JP: Chronic stress induces adrenal hyperplasia and hypertrophy in a subregion-specific manner. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 291:E965-73. 10.1152/ajpendo.00070.2006
  2. Lindholm J: Cushing’s syndrome: historical aspects. Pituitary. 2000, 3:97-104. 10.1023/a:1009905808033
  3. Raff H, Carroll T: Cushing’s syndrome: from physiological principles to diagnosis and clinical care. J Physiol. 2015, 593:493-506. 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.282871
  4. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK: Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2006, 367:1605-17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68699-6
  5. Savas M, Mehta S, Agrawal N, van Rossum EF, Feelders RA: Approach to the patient: diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022, 107:3162-74. 10.1210/clinem/dgac492
  6. Suarez MG, Stack M, Hinojosa-Amaya JM, et al.: Hypercoagulability in Cushing syndrome, prevalence of thrombotic events: a large, single-center, retrospective study. J Endocr Soc. 2020, 4:bvz033. 10.1210/jendso/bvz033
  7. St-Jean M, Lim DS, Langlois F: Hypercoagulability in Cushing’s syndrome: from arterial to venous disease. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021, 35:101496. 10.1016/j.beem.2021.101496
  8. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Murad MH, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Tabarin A: Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015, 100:2807-31. 10.1210/jc.2015-1818
  9. Isand K, Arima H, Bertherat J, et al.: Delphi panel consensus on recommendations for thromboprophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in endogenous Cushing’s syndrome: a position statement. Eur J Endocrinol. 2025, 192:R17-27. 10.1093/ejendo/lvaf017
  10. McCormick JP, Sun M, Shafqat I, Heaney AP, Bergsneider M, Wang MB: Venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis in Cushing Disease patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2022, 27:10.1016/j.inat.2021.101371
  11. Feelders RA, Nieman LK: Hypercoagulability in Cushing’s syndrome: incidence, pathogenesis and need for thromboprophylaxis protocols. Pituitary. 2022, 25:746-9. 10.1007/s11102-022-01261-9
  12. Varlamov EV, Langlois F, Vila G, Fleseriu M: Management of endocrine disease: cardiovascular risk assessment, thromboembolism, and infection prevention in Cushing’s syndrome: a practical approach. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021, 184:R207-24. 10.1530/EJE-20-1309
  13. Fleseriu M, Biller BM, Grossman A, Swearingen B, Melmed S: Hypercoagulability in Cushing’s disease: a risk awareness and prophylaxis survey on behalf of the Pituitary Society. 15th International Pituitary Congress: Program and Abstracts. The Pituitary Society, Orlando, FL; 2017. 35.
  14. van Haalen FM, Kaya M, Pelsma IC, et al.: Current clinical practice for thromboprophylaxis management in patients with Cushing’s syndrome across reference centers of the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022, 17:178. 10.1186/s13023-022-02320-x
  15. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, et al.: Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9:847-75. 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7
  16. Lopes V, Marques O, De Sousa Lages A: Preventive strategies for hypercoagulation in Cushing’s syndrome: when and how. Thromb J. 2023, 21:72. 10.1186/s12959-023-00515-1
  17. Barbot M, Daidone V, Zilio M, et al.: Perioperative thromboprophylaxis in Cushing’s disease: what we did and what we are doing?. Pituitary. 2015, 18:487-93. 10.1007/s11102-014-0600-y
  18. Isand K, Feelders R, Brue T, et al.: High prevalence of venous thrombotic events in Cushing’s syndrome: data from ERCUSYN and details in relation to surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2024, 190:75-85. 10.1093/ejendo/lvad176
  19. Zilio M, Mazzai L, Sartori MT, et al.: A venous thromboembolism risk assessment model for patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrine. 2016, 52:322-32. 10.1007/s12020-015-0665-z
  20. Zaorsky NG, Buyyounouski MK, Li T, Horwitz EM: Aspirin and statin nonuse associated with early biochemical failure after prostate radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012, 84:e13-7. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.050
  21. Semple PL, Laws ER Jr: Complications in a contemporary series of patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease. J Neurosurg. 1999, 91:175-9. 10.3171/jns.1999.91.2.0175
  22. Smith TR, Hulou MM, Huang KT, Nery B, de Moura SM, Cote DJ, Laws ER: Complications after transsphenoidal surgery for patients with Cushing’s disease and silent corticotroph adenomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2015, 38:E12. 10.3171/2014.10.FOCUS14705
  23. Diep R, Garcia 😧 Does aspirin prevent venous thromboembolism?. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020, 2020:634-41. 10.1182/hematology.2020000150
  24. Maddukuri RK, Chava H, Kondaveeti ST, Mutthineni MV, Vegesana BP: Aspirin for prophylaxis of VTE in patients with hip/ knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Indian J Pharmacol. 2024, 56:420-9. 10.4103/ijp.ijp_732_21
  25. Spoladore R, Milani M, Spreafico LP, Agnelli G, Savonitto S: Prevention of thromboembolism after a fracture: is aspirin enough?. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024, 26:i102-7. 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae025
  26. Undas A, Brummel-Ziedins KE, Mann KG: Antithrombotic properties of aspirin and resistance to aspirin: beyond strictly antiplatelet actions. Blood. 2007, 109:2285-92. 10.1182/blood-2006-01-010645

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/371036-therapeutic-options-for-the-prevention-of-thromboses-in-cushings-syndrome-a-propensity-matched-retrospective-cohort-analysis?score_article=true#!/

Filed under: Cushing's, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Violaceous Abdominal Striae Noted on Physical Examination: A Clue to the Diagnosis of Cushing’s Syndrome

Posted on March 21, 2024 by MaryO

This article costs $70 to buy :(  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2024-259687

Doctors should suspect Cushing’s syndrome when they see patients with purple stretch marks and metabolic conditions such as diabetes, even if those symptoms aren’t the reasons for a medical visit, physicians in Japan wrote in a case study describing how they reached that diagnosis for a woman in her early 30s.

Filed under: Cushing's, symptoms | Tagged: , | Leave a comment »