Myth: “You should be all better by now!

Myth: “You should be all better by now! You found out what was wrong, you got the surgery, it’s been quite some time, and you are STILL not better?! You SHOULD have gotten better by now!” Chronic illness follows the same pattern as normal illness. You get diagnosed, treated, and then go back to a state of recovery, eventually leading you back to a state of “normal health”.

Fact: Chronic illness is called chronic illness for a reason, because it is chronic! Wayne Dyer addresses this myth: We usually expect to follow a pattern that is characteristic of most illness. “The person has an illness and falls from the path of normal health. Then, comes a period of diagnosis and treatment followed by a period of convalescence (the general recovery of health and strength after illness). Finally, the person returns to good health again” (p. 251).

The person is supported, typically, by family, friends, neighbors, and their church community during the illness, treatment, and recovery, assuming that at some point the person will return to normal health and their assistance will no longer be needed (p. 251).

However, in the case of the chronically ill, a different cycle occurs. In the chronically ill, the person loses his normal health. He goes through a period of treatment and sometimes recovers. “But for a number of reasons, depending on the illness, the person does not return to a condition of normal health but continues in a fluctuating pattern of chronic ill health. The person may have periods when he feels better or worse, but at no time does he ever return to complete good health.” (p. 252).

According to Dyer (1990), “Unfortunately, family members, friends, and neighbors do not know how to respond to this unfamiliar pattern, and they usually shift their attention away from the chronically ill person as others with the more normal cycle of sickness occupy their attention” (p 252). At this point, the person with the chronic illness feels a lack of support, understanding, and help. This can lead to increased pain, depression, and anxiety.

It is very difficult for family members, such as spouses, to deal with the person with chronic illness. “Chronic illness can disrupt and pide a family, or it can provide the family with an opportunity to grow in understanding, patience, sacrifice, and love for one another” (Dyer, 1990, p. 256).

For the chronically ill person and his family, the friends, neighbors, and church can either be a source of support and help or elicit feelings of neglect, rejection, and misunderstanding. Most people help at the beginning of the illness, but then become confused when the person doesn’t get better, so they withdraw their attention (p. 256).

Here are some ideas for helping the chronically ill person and family:

• Discuss in some detail with the person how his illness is affecting him and his family and find out what his needs are

• Make short visits to not overtire or over stimulate the patient

• Send a card or make a short phone call to the sick person

• Look for ways to help with young children

• Send a small gift

• Avoid saying things to make the person feel pressured such as “I hope you can come back to church every Sunday now”

• Don’t ask, “What can I do to help?” People don’t like to have to ask for support. Express sensitivity and go ahead and do something (p. 258).

Reference: Dyer, W.G. (1990). Chronic Illness. In R. L. Britsch & T.D. Olson (Ed.), Counseling: A guide to helping others, volume 2, 250-259.

Please take the time to view this video on “Chronic Illness versus Normal Illness” and share with your loved ones:

Some Lifestyle Tips for Cushing’s Syndrome

There are some ideas in the post below and some at http://www.cushings-info.com/index.php?title=Help_Yourself,_Part_1 (and also parts 2 and 3!)

Do you have any other helpful tips for the New Year?

Below is from https://www.endocrineweb.com/conditions/cushings-syndrome/4-lifestyle-tips-cushings-syndrome

As part of your overall Cushing’s syndrome treatment plan, there are some lifestyle tips you can incorporate to help you live well with Cushing’s syndrome.

Below are 4 lifestyle tips you can integrate into your recovery plan from Cushing’s syndrome. Have a conversation with your doctor before making any major changes, such as starting to exercise regularly.

  1. Eat smart. Make sure you’re eating nutritious foods. Of course, you should focus on eating fruits and vegetables, which are high in anti-oxidants, but also eat whole grains, lean protein, and healthy fats. These foods fuel your body by giving you healthy doses of energy.

    Also, be sure you get enough calcium and vitamin D in your diet. These nutrients help strengthen bones (important because bone loss is common with people who have Cushing’s syndrome). If you don’t get enough of these in your diet, talk to your doctor about taking calcium and vitamin D supplements.

    A registered dietitian (RD) can help you create a balanced meal plan—the key word here is “balanced.” Yes, you can still eat the foods you love (in moderation), but it’s important to eat foods that boost your health. An RD can also help you lose extra weight you gained from Cushing’s syndrome.

  2. Exercise gently. Exercise plays a significant role in any healthy lifestyle, but it’s important for you not to rush into it. Even if you think you’re feeling better, your body still needs time to heal.

    Start off slowly-you may want to try low—impact exercise, such as water aerobics, tai chi, or yoga. These exercises gently re-build your muscles and joints. From there, you can work up to a more moderate-paced exercise routine. You can also work with a personal trainer who can customize a workout plan for you.

    Exercising should be comfortable. If you experience pain or any new symptoms when exercising, talk to your doctor right away.

  3. Keep tabs on your mental health. Your mental health can take a toll when you have Cushing’s syndrome—depression is common. If you feel blue or you don’t feel like doing the things you used to and you’re not sure why, don’t ignore it. Talk to your doctor—he or she can recommend a psychologist who can help you cope with your feelings throughout your recovery.

    You may also want to keep a journal to record how you feel on a day-to-day basis.

  4. Give yourself a break. Don’t be hard on yourself as your body recovers from Cushing’s syndrome. It’s important to get plenty of rest, relaxation, and sleep. Treat yourself to a gentle massage, warm bubble bath, or listen to soothing music. Now’s not the time to push yourself—respect your body and its limits.

Incorporating these lifestyle tips into your routine can not only help you live well, but they can help you thrive with Cushing’s syndrome.

Insulin Resistance Unveiled: Cushing’s Disease in a Patient with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Worsening Glycemic Control

Highlights

  • Coexistence of hypercortisolism secondary to ACTH-producing pituitary adenoma and type 1 diabetes mellitus.
  • Presentation of Cushing’s disease in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
  • Automated insulin delivery utilization in type 1 diabetes with comorbid refractory hypercortisolism.

ABSTRACT

Background/Objective

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is an autoimmune disease often characterized by endogenous insulin deficiency and often sensitivity to endogenous insulin administration. Cushing’s disease, though rare, should be considered as a cause of insulin resistance and increased insulin requirements in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Case Presentation

A 21-year-old female with type 1 diabetes mellitus presented with steadily increasing insulin requirements via her hybrid closed-loop insulin pump. She subsequently developed hypertension, weight gain, violaceous striae, and cystic acne. Laboratory evaluation revealed unsuppressed cortisol of 16.6 μg/dL after a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test, with a simultaneous adrenocorticotropin hormone level of 73.3 pg/mL. Pituitary MRI showed a 1.9 cm sellar mass with local invasion. She underwent transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. Postoperative cortisol was 8.9 μg/dL after intraoperative dexamethasone exposure. Residual hypercortisolism was confirmed, necessitating gamma knife radiation and pharmacologic treatment with a steroidogenesis inhibitor.

Discussion

We present a case of Cushing’s disease due to a corticotropin-secreting pituitary macroadenoma in a young woman with type 1 diabetes. Her initial presentation included rising insulin requirements, followed by overt hypercortisolism. Despite surgery, persistent hypercortisolism required further intervention with gamma knife radiation and osilodrostat. She experienced reductions in both weight and insulin needs, with normalization of cortisol levels on maintenance osilodrostat.

Conclusion

Cushing’s syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with type 1 diabetes and increasing insulin requirements. This case underscores the importance of regular review of automated insulin delivery data and consideration of endocrine causes of insulin resistance and increased insulin requirements in those with type 1 diabetes.

KEY WORDS

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
T1DM
Cushing’s disease
Insulin resistance
Insulin pump
Total Daily Dose
TDD

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome occurs as the result of prolonged elevation in plasma cortisol which can lead to adverse effects including insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, hypertension, weight gain, immunosuppression, and neurocognitive changes. Cushing’s syndrome can occur due to exogenous exposure to corticosteroids or endogenous cortisol hypersecretion. The most common etiology of endogenous hypercortisolism is Cushing’s disease secondary to a corticotrophin-secreting pituitary tumor. In 90% of cases of Cushing’s disease, patients present with pituitary microadenomas, with only 10% of patients presenting with pituitary tumors >1 cm1.
Type 1 diabetes mellitus is an autoimmune condition characterized by T-cell mediated destruction of pancreatic beta cells with ultimate inability to produce insulin and subsequent insulin dependence2. Over the last decade, there has been significant advancement in diabetes management strategies and insulin delivery with creation of hybrid closed-loop insulin pump technology used in conjunction with continuous glucose monitoring systems to provide automated insulin delivery. Within the field of endocrinology, this has required a shift in both the interpretation of glycemic data, insulin utilization data, as well as a pivot to approaching titration of insulin pump settings. Assessment of total daily basal and total daily dose (TDD) in automated mode is of utmost importance when utilizing automated insulin delivery as the amount of insulin utilized can vary significantly in comparison to fixed quantities seen with use of manual mode in an insulin pump2,3.
Type 1 diabetes mellitus is typically characterized by relative insulin sensitivity, particularly early in the disease course. Patients can develop insulin resistance over time, particularly in the setting of comorbid obesity. However, we present a case of a young woman with type 1 diabetes mellitus presenting with steadily increasing insulin requirements followed by development of overt Cushing’s secondary to corticotropin-secreting pituitary macroadenoma. She was utilizing a hybrid-closed loop insulin pump technology with insulin pump download indicating diminished glycemic control despite a steady increase in total daily insulin requirements. This is only the third reported case of Cushing’s disease in a person living with type 1 diabetes mellitus4,5.

Case Presentation

A 21-year-old female with a history of type 1 diabetes diagnosed at age 11 in the context of admission for diabetic ketoacidosis initially presented to adult endocrinology for routine outpatient diabetes management. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus was managed with automated hybrid-closed loop insulin pump technology (Tandem T-slim X:2 with Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring system). Her hemoglobin A1c was 6.2% with a review of her continuous glucose monitoring system indicating time in range of 73% with 21% of blood glucose levels >180 mg/dL. At that time, she reported concerns regarding high insulin requirements despite an active lifestyle as she was running out of insulin for use in pump early. She was noted to have significant prandial insulin requirements with insulin to carbohydrate ratio of 1 unit for every 3.0-4.5 carbohydrates, raising concern for insulin resistance. Over the next 16 months, she had weight gain of 15.8 kg with elevation in blood pressure and worsening hyperglycemia. Review of her insulin pump downloads indicated a steady increase in her total daily insulin requirements of close to 30%, coupled with reduced time in range and increase in HbA1c.
On repeat physical examination, the development of cystic acne, trace pitting pedal edema, and purple violaceous striae on the abdomen, hips, and thighs were observed. She was also noted to have a new elevation of blood pressure to 162/101 mm Hg. She declined exposure to exogenous corticosteroids (including oral, topical or intra-articular formulations). Based on clinical examination and changes in insulin requirements, the decision was made to evaluate for hypercortisolism. Laboratory evaluation at that time revealed unsuppressed 08:00 AM cortisol level of 16.6 ug/dL after 1 mg of dexamethasone the evening prior. Dexamethasone level was confirmed to be more than adequate at 418 ng/dL (reference range for 8:00 AM level following 1 mg dexamethasone previous evening: 140-295 ng/dL). A simultaneous ACTH level was elevated at 73.3 pg/mL (reference range: 7.2-63.3 pg/mL). She was also noted to have midnight salivary cortisol levels of 0.646, 0.290, and 0.350 ug/dL on three consecutive evenings (reference range <0.010-0.090 ug/dL).
She then underwent MRI pituitary with and without gadolinium enhancement which revealed 1.8 x 1.9 cm enhancing sellar mass with invasion of the right cavernous sinus, extension around the right internal carotid artery, as well as posteriorly down the dorsal aspect of the clivus (Figures 1 and 2). As both hypercortisolism as well as type 1 diabetes mellitus have been implicated as etiologies for lower bone density with subsequent increased risk of osteoporosis later in life, bone densometry was also obtained for this patient. She was found to have low bone mineral density for her age with Z-score of the lumbar spine of -3.2, Z-score of the femoral neck of -2.3, and Z-score of the total hip of -2.8.

  1. Download: Download high-res image (173KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Figure 1. MRI pituitary coronal image revealing sellar mass with invasion of the right cavernous sinus, extension around the right internal carotid artery.

  1. Download: Download high-res image (209KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Figure 2. MRI pituitary sagittal image revealing 1.8 x 1.9 cm sellar mass.

She was evaluated by neurosurgery and underwent endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenoma. Pathology revealed immunoreactivity for neuroendocrine marker INSM1 (Insulinoma-associated protein 1) and adrenocorticotropic hormone. The lesion was negative for immunoreactivity for prolactin, growth hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and beta-luteinizing hormone.
The cortisol level was 8.9 ug/dL on post-operative day 1. It is notable that she had received 10 mg of intravenous Dexamethasone intraoperatively, raising concern for residual tumor. On post-operative day 3, cortisol level was 4.1 mcg/dL with ACTH level of 94.5 pg/mL. Repeat random cortisol level was 16.3 mcg/dL with simultaneous ACTH level of 63.3 pg/mL. Upon being discharged home, a repeat 24-hour urinary free cortisol was obtained in the outpatient setting and found to be elevated at 464 ug/24 hours (reference range: 6-42 ug/24 hours), consistent with refractory hypercortisolism (Table 1Figure 4). She was then initiated on osilodrostat, a steroidogenesis inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2020 for use in refractory Cushing’s disease after pituitary surgery. Osilodrostat works via inhibition of 11β-hydroxylase and aldosterone synthase to inhibit the production of cortisol and aldosterone6,7. She underwent ongoing up titration to a maintenance dose of osilodrostat 7 mg twice daily with additional insulin pump titrations over a 2-year duration. Urinary free cortisol was monitored as this is the gold standard for monitoring refractory Cushing’s and the preferred modality for monitoring cortisol levels in individuals on osilodrostat. Final repeat 24-hour urine free cortisol level normalized to 35 ug/24 hours and TDD of insulin via automatic insulin delivery system was lower than time of diagnosis of pituitary Cushing’s at 96 units per day despite having had a roughly 27 kg weight gain (Table 1Figure 4).

Table 1. Weight trends as well as TDD of insulin listed along with glycemic parameters from automated insulin dosing system Tandem T-slim X:2 with automated mode utilizing Decom G6 CGM. 24-hour urine cortisol collection data included to highlight degree of hypercortisolism. Treatments denoted by asterisk in table include

Date Weight (kg) Total daily insulin dose (units/day) HbA1c (%) Time in range (%) Urine cortisol (mcg/24 hours); RR 6-42 mcg/24 hours
03/2021 72.7 99.25 6.2 73
06/2021 74.5 109.56 6.6 73
12/2021 80.0 117.17 6.9 62
05/2022 88.5 126.84 6.9 57
11/2022
12/2022 93.8 124.15 7.0 61 464
01/2023∗∗
02/2023 35
06/2023∗∗∗
06/2023 100.4 122.76 7.0 54
07/2023 137
12/2023 100.9 130.34 6.8 48 48
08/2024 106 125 6.9 58 76
02/2025 100 96 5.8 76 42
Transsphenoidal resection.
∗∗
Osilodrostat initiated.
∗∗∗
Gamma knife radiosurgery.

  1. Download: Download high-res image (236KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Figure 3. MRI pituitary coronal image revealing right eccentric heterogenous enhancing sellar mass which is decreased in size. Redemonstrated residual tissue around the right carotid artery.

  1. Download: Download high-res image (220KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Figure 4. Graphical representation of weight (kg), total daily dose of insulin (units per day), and 24-hour urine cortisol measurements (mcg/24 hours).

Due to ongoing hypercortisolism, repeat MRI pituitary with and without gadolinium enhancement was obtained and revealed residual disease in the right sella with right cavernous sinus involvement and extending posteriorly along the dorsal aspect of the clivus (Figure 3). She had subsequent consultation with neurosurgery at which time the decision made to proceed with single-fraction gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. She received additional treatment of gamma knife radiosurgery with dose of 18 Gy to target residual pituitary disease.

Discussion

We present, to our knowledge, the third reported case of Cushing’s disease due to a corticotropin-secreting pituitary adenoma in an individual with type 1 diabetes. Prolonged hypercortisolism, as seen in this case, is associated with obesity, hypertension, decreased bone density, insulin resistance, and decreased glucose control. Hypercortisolism is most commonly caused by chronic exogenous corticosteroid exposure however, endogenous hypercortisolemia should be considered as a potential etiology of worsening glycemia and insulin resistance in individuals with diabetes mellitus.
The coexistence of Cushing’s disease secondary to a corticotropin-secreting pituitary macroadenoma in an individualwith type 1 diabetes mellitus is exceedingly rare. Furthermore, only 10% of pituitary Cushing’s cases present with macroadenomas at the time of diagnosis. Several studies indicate that smaller lesions at the time of diagnosis and earlier diagnosis of Cushing’s disease are associated with reduced risk of disease recurrence6,7,8. In this case, a young female presented with a macroadenoma at the time of diagnosis and had residual post-operative hypercortisolism requiring gamma knife radiation and pharmacologic intervention with osilodrostat, a steroidogenesis inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2020 for use in refractory Cushing’s disease after pituitary surgery. Osilodrostat works via inhibition of 11β-hydroxylase and aldosterone synthase to inhibit the production of cortisol and aldosterone9,10. Of the two other reported cases of comorbid type 1 diabetes and Cushing’s disease, one individual presented with a macroadenoma at the time of diagnosis. This case occurred in a pediatric male with type 1 diabetes mellitus who was ultimately admitted to the hospital with worsening headaches in the setting of pituitary apoplexy. Prior to hospitalization, this individual showed numerous clinical stigmata of hypercortisolism.
Other contributors to increased insulin resistance, such as obesity, infection, stress, and concurrent glucocorticoids, should also be considered in the differential diagnosis when evaluating etiologies for unexplained changes in glycemic control. However, this case emphasizes the importance of considering the possibility of comorbid Cushing’s disease in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This is imperative to mitigate the consequences of prolonged hypercortisolism and to potentially aid in earlier diagnosis. In this case, declining glucose control and increasing insulin requirements were noted prior to other overt clinical findings of hypercortisolism. Thus, this case also underscores the importance of steadfast evaluation of insulin dose requirements for individuals using continuous insulin infusion devices (particularly hybrid closed-loop automated insulin delivery [AID] systems). With growing emphasis on the review and utilization of the one-page ambulatory glucose profile, it is important to also review insulin pump settings and insulin delivery for those utilizing these systems as automated insulin delivery profile for total daily dose can change and should be reviewed at each visit.

Conclusion

In closing, this case emphasizes the importance of considering secondary endocrine disorders in those living with diabetes mellitus who experience sudden or unexplained changes in glycemic control and insulin requirements. Although rare, coexistence of type 1 diabetes and Cushing’s disease can occur. Prompt recognition and treatment of the underlying Cushing’s disease can lead to significant improvements in insulin sensitivity and glycemic outcomes. This report reinforces the need for multidisciplinary management of vigilant monitoring in patients with coexisting endocrine pathologies, particularly when advanced diabetes technologies are in use. Ultimately, it highlights the critical role of clinical suspicion and timely intervention in optimizing outcomes for complex endocrine cases.

Uncited reference

1.1..

References

Low Cortisol Levels Hours After Surgery Predict Long-term Remission in Cushing’s Patients

The level of decline in blood cortisol levels in the immediate period after transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease may help predict which patients will achieve long-term disease remission.

The study, “Earlier post-operative hypocortisolemia may predict durable remission from Cushing’s Disease” was published in the European Journal of Endocrinology.

Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is a minimally invasive procedure for removing pituitary adenomas and is the primary treatment for Cushing’s disease.

But, while 77 to 98 percent of patients achieve remission after TSS, a third of these patients eventually will see their disease returning.

The surgical removal of the pituitary adenoma often leads to a drop in the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels (hypocortisolemia).

“In the post-operative setting, failure to achieve hypocortisolemia is thought to reflect the presence of residual tumor cells,” the researchers wrote in the study. “Therefore, serum cortisol has become a well-established biochemical marker of early surgical remission.”

In an attempt to identify patients with a complete tumor resection – and with lower risk of recurrence – researchers examined the rates of serum cortisol decline in the immediate period after surgery.

The study included 257 Cushing’s disease patients who underwent 291 TSS interventions at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), between 2003 and 2016.

After surgery, patients had their cortisol levels measured every six hours until the third day after surgery. Then, patients had their cortisol levels measured every morning until day 10 or were discharged.

Early remission was defined based on nadir serum cortisol levels – the lowest concentration of cortisol, that is usually reached during the night – below 5 μg/dL.

Of 268 unique admissions, 90 percent of patients (241) achieved remission with a post-operative cortisol nadir below 5 μg/dL within 10 postoperative days.

However, recurrence was seen in 9 percent of these patients. For those with a cortisol nadir below 2 μg/dL, the rates of recurrence dropped to 6 percent.

Interestingly, the team found that cortisol levels below 5 μg/dL by 15 hours after surgery or below 2 μg/dL in the first 21 hours may “accurately predict durable remission in the intermediate term.”

“In our cohort, early, profound hypocortisolemia could be used as a clinical prediction tool for durable remission,” the researchers wrote.

“Such a clinical prediction tool may have significant utility in the management of [Cushing’s disease]. Further validation of its accuracy in a multi-centre prospective study with longer-term follow up is warranted,” the study concluded.

From https://cushingsdiseasenews.com/2018/01/18/low-cortisol-levels-after-surgery-may-predict-remission-cushings-disease/

How to avoid pitfalls in interpretation of adrenal imaging

By Philip Ward, AuntMinnieEurope.com staff writer

January 15, 2019 — A clear understanding of the pitfalls in the performance and interpretation of adrenal CT can help prevent incorrect and inappropriate investigations, award-winning researchers from a top London facility have found. It’s essential to keep aware of the full range of pseudolesions and mimics, they said.

“Evaluation of adrenal tumor function is limited on imaging, but may be inferred from imaging findings,” noted Dr. Gurinder Nandra and colleagues from the department of radiology at St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in an e-poster presentation that received a cum laude award at RSNA 2018 in Chicago.

Other adrenal pathology, including metastases and adrenocortical carcinoma, may be encountered, and this means it’s important to know about the imaging approaches to evaluate the adrenals, the authors pointed out.

Incidental adrenal nodules are identified in around 5% of patients who undergo CT. The prevalence of detecting incidentalomas increases with age, but most incidentally encountered adrenal pathology is benign and of little clinical relevance, they wrote. Adenomas are by far the most common adrenal pathology identified.

Among the technical aspects that deserve special attention are the following:

  • The region of interest (ROI): Changing the size of the ROI can alter the perceived attenuation of the nodule. The ROI should cover at least two-thirds of the circumference of the nodule, and exclude tiny areas of heterogeneity from the ROI (e.g., flecks of calcification) that are not representative of the adrenal pathology. Unenhanced attenuation of less than 10 Hounsfield units (HU) can be used to diagnose lipid-rich adrenal adenoma (sensitivity 71%, specificity of 98%).
  • Attenuation values on unenhanced CT: A homogenously dense lesion on unenhanced CT suggests a lack of microscopic lipid content. If attenuation on unenhanced CT is greater than 20 to 30 HU, evaluate the enhancement kinetics with CT.
  • Effect of kVp on attenuation values in a dual energy study: To use threshold of less than 10 HU to diagnose a lipid-rich adrenal adenoma, the kVp should be 120. Changing kVp can alter the attenuation values of soft tissues and adrenal glands.
  • Timing of post-contrast acquisitions: “Imaging needs to be performed at the correct times to allow sufficient time for enhancement and washout of contrast. Post-contrast images should be obtained at 60 to 75 seconds and 15 minutes,” the authors stated.
  • Assessment of washout on nondedicated studies: Relative washout can be calculated on nondedicated studies if more than one acquisition is made within 15 minutes post-intravenous contrast.
  • Suspicious attenuation: Attenuation of more than 43 HU on noncontrast CT is suspicious for malignancy, regardless of washout characteristics. PET/CT is of more use than CT and MRI in such cases, and adrenal hemorrhage also is a consideration at this attenuation.
  • Evaluation of small nodules: Minor nodularity of less than 1 cm in diameter does not require further radiological investigation. Also, CT evaluation of small adrenal nodules is limited by partial volume artifacts. MRI evaluation of small adrenal nodules is limited by the India ink artifact, or black boundary artifact, on an out-of-phase sequence. This artifact may give the impression of signal loss and lead to an incorrect diagnosis of a lipid-rich adenoma.
  • Evaluation of large adrenal masses: Malignancy risk increases with size (over 4 cm, 70%; over 6 cm, 85%) when excluding myelolipoma. In the absence of known malignancy, an adrenal lesion of less than 4 cm with indeterminate imaging features is likely to be benign.
  • Enhancement characteristics of metastases: Enhancement/washout characteristics of adrenal metastases are variable, and they can be confused with pheochromocytoma.
  • Adrenal calcification: Calcification is seen in benign adrenal pathology, but also can be seen in cases of malignancy, including adrenocortical carcinoma. “Look for ancillary features of malignancy including size, heterogeneity and invasion,” the authors recommended. “Evaluation of a predominantly calcified adrenal lesion will be limited with chemical shift MRI.”
  • Heterogeneous signal loss: Heterogeneous signal loss is not typical for a small lipid-rich adenoma and raises the possibility of malignant pathology. It also can be seen in larger adenomas because of calcification/cystic change/myelolipomatous metaplasia.

In their RSNA 2018 exhibit, Nandra and colleagues also identified the following list of mimics that can crop up:

  • Mimics arising from gastrointestinal tract: Gastric pathology can extend into the left suprarenal space and mimic adrenal pathology. The most common mimics include gastrointestinal stromal tumors and gastric diverticula. Pathology elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract can mimic adrenal pathology (e.g., a fluid-filled colon).
  • Mimics arising from solid viscera: Pathology from the spleen, pancreas, liver, and kidneys can extend into the suprarenal space and mimic adrenal pathology. This includes splenic lobulation, splenunculi, upper pole renal pathology, pancreatic tail pathology, and exophytic hepatic lesions.
  • Mimics arising from vessels: Dilated, tortuous, or aneurysmal vessels may extend into the suprarenal space and mimic adrenal pathology. The most common mimics include splenic varices and splenic artery pseudoaneurysms.
  • Mimics arising from retroperitoneal tissues: Various retroperitoneal lesions can extend into the suprarenal space and mimic adrenal pathology, and normal anatomy in the retroperitoneum also can mimic adrenal pathology (e.g., a thickened diaphragmatic crus).

From https://www.auntminnieeurope.com/index.aspx?sec=ser&sub=def&pag=dis&ItemID=616803