Ectopic CRH/ACTH-Co-Secreting Neuroendocrine Tumors Leading to Cushing’s Disease

Abstract

Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) are essential regulators of cortisol production within the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Elevated cortisol levels, resulting from excessive ACTH, can lead to Cushing’s syndrome, a condition with significant morbidity. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can ectopically produce both ACTH and CRH, contributing to this syndrome. This review discusses the pathophysiology, types, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of these tumors. Emphasis is placed on the importance of identifying dual CRH/ACTH secretion, which complicates diagnosis and necessitates tailored therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, the review highlights the prognosis, common complications, and future directions for research in this area.

We report the case of a 53-year-old female patient who presented with severe Cushing’s syndrome and was diagnosed with ectopic ACTH syndrome. Despite initial indications pointing towards pituitary-dependent hypercortisolism, further investigations revealed the presence of a highly differentiated atypically located tumor in the upper lobe of the left lung, adjacent to the mediastinum. Immunohistochemistry of the tumor tissue demonstrated not only ACTH but also CRH and CRH-R1 expression. The simultaneous expression of these molecules supports the hypothesis of the presence of a positive endocrine feedback loop within the NET, in which the release of CRH stimulates the expression of ACTH via binding to CRH-R1. This case report highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing ectopic ACTH syndrome, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach to identify secondary factors impacting cortisol production, such as CRH production and other contributing neuroendocrine mechanisms.

Journal Section:

Review Article

This content is only available via PDF.

The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). Usage, derivative works and distribution are permitted provided that proper credit is given to the author and the original publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Treatment-Resistant Cushing Disease and Acromegaly in a Young Woman: A Case Of Functional Pituitary Macroadenoma

Abstract

Cushing disease and acromegaly are common endocrine disorders caused by excessive cortisol and growth hormone production, respectively. Both conditions can co-occur due to functioning pituitary adenomas, which are typically benign pituitary gland tumors. This report discusses a 30-year-old woman with hyperpituitarism leading to treatment-resistant Cushing disease and acromegaly caused by a functional pituitary macroadenoma.
A 30-year-old woman presented with a history of excessive weight gain, facial puffiness, fatigue, persistent headaches, and visual disturbances. Clinical examination revealed features consistent with Cushing disease and acromegaly, including a moon face, central obesity, and large hands and feet—the ophthalmologic evaluation identified bitemporal hemianopia, suggesting optic chiasm compression. Laboratory results showed elevated ACTH, IGF-1, and prolactin levels, alongside confirmed hypercortisolism. The patient also had secondary diabetes mellitus and galactorrhea—initial treatment with octreotide provided limited benefit, with persistent hormone elevations and insufficient symptom control. The patient underwent endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of the pituitary macroadenoma, leading to marked symptomatic and hormonal improvements. This underscores the diagnostic challenge and treatment complexity of such cases. Early diagnosis is critical for optimizing outcomes in patients with hyperpituitarism and mitigating complications. This case highlights the importance of multidisciplinary management and the necessity of long-term follow-up to monitor for recurrence and ensure sustained remission.

Introduction

Pituitary adenomas are benign tumors arising from the pituitary gland, often referred to as the “master gland” due to its central role in regulating key physiological processes such as growth, metabolism, and reproduction [1,2]. These tumors are classified by size into microadenomas (<10 mm) and macroadenomas (≥10 mm) and by hormonal activity into functioning and nonfunctioning adenomas. Functioning adenomas actively secrete hormones, leading to distinct syndromes such as prolactinomas, acromegaly (from growth hormone overproduction), and Cushing disease (from excess ACTH). In contrast, nonfunctioning adenomas do not secrete hormones but may cause symptoms due to mass effects, such as visual disturbances or hypopituitarism [[3][4][5]].
The simultaneous occurrence of Cushing disease and acromegaly is rare and presents a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Both conditions stem from hyperpituitarism, typically due to a functional pituitary adenoma [6,7]. Cushing disease results from ACTH hypersecretion, causing excessive cortisol production and features such as central obesity, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and muscle weakness [[8][9][10]]. Prolonged cortisol exposure can lead to severe complications, including cardiovascular diseases and osteoporosis. Acromegaly, on the other hand, arises from growth hormone overproduction, leading to elevated IGF-1 levels and characteristic features such as enlarged extremities, facial changes, and systemic complications like insulin resistance and joint abnormalities [[11][12][13]].
The coexistence of Cushing disease and acromegaly within the same affected person is extraordinarily rare, making this particular case record particularly noteworthy [14,15].
The simultaneous presentation of these 2 endocrine problems in a young lady because of a hormonally functioning pituitary macroadenoma presents a unique scientific venture [16,17]. The pituitary macroadenoma, defined as a tumor more than 10 mm in diameter, can compress adjoining structures within the sella turcica and enlarge into surrounding areas, leading to signs and symptoms with complications, visible disturbances, and hyperpituitarism. In this case, the patient presented with both Cushing disease and acromegaly, at the same time symptoms as a result of the mass impact of the macroadenoma.
The case of a 30-year-old female with hyperpituitarism, characterized with the aid of drug-resistant Cushing disease and acromegaly, highlights the complexities intricately associated with the analysis and control of a couple of endocrine issues bobbing up from a single pituitary macroadenoma. Her medical presentation changed into one marked by a history of noticeable weight gain, facial puffiness, fatigue, chronic complications, and visual disturbances. A thorough physical exam found traits consistent with each Cushing disorder and acromegaly, which include a moon face, vital weight problems, and enlarged arms and toes. The ophthalmologic exam confirmed bitemporal hemianopia, indicative of optic chiasm compression with the aid of the pituitary macroadenoma. Early recognition and multidisciplinary management are essential to mitigate the significant morbidity associated with these conditions. This case report highlights a rare instance of concurrent Cushing disease and acromegaly due to a functional pituitary macroadenoma, underscoring the importance of timely diagnosis and treatment.

Case presentation

This case of a 30-year-old female highlights the complexities of diagnosing and managing a functional pituitary macroadenoma presenting with overlapping features of Cushing disease and acromegaly, along with secondary diabetes mellitus.
The patient demonstrated classic signs of hypercortisolism, including central obesity with a “moon face” and “buffalo hump,” skin thinning, easy bruising, and muscle weakness. Cortisol’s catabolic effects were evident in her limb wasting and truncal obesity. Metabolic complications included hypertension and secondary diabetes mellitus, supported by elevated random blood sugar (22 mmol/L) and postprandial blood sugar levels (27 mmol/L). Laboratory findings showed significantly elevated ACTH levels (670 pg/mL; normal: 10–60 pg/mL) and increased morning urine cortisol levels.
The patient also exhibited hallmark features of acromegaly, including enlarged hands and feet, necessitating larger shoe and glove sizes, and distinct facial changes such as mandibular prognathism, frontal bossing, and nasal broadening. Soft tissue swelling and fatigue were also noted, alongside joint pain likely resulting from cartilage and bone overgrowth. Her IGF-1 levels were markedly elevated (798 ng/mL; normal: 100–300 ng/mL).
Hyperprolactinemia (643 ng/mL; normal: 5–25 ng/mL) caused galactorrhea, likely resulting from tumor compression of the pituitary stalk or direct prolactin secretion. Diabetes mellitus, secondary to insulin resistance driven by excess cortisol and growth hormone, further complicated her clinical picture (Table 1).

Table 1. Markedly elevated hormone levels preoperatively and their postoperative normalization.

Hormone Patient’s level (Preoperative) Postoperative levels Normal reference value
ACTH 670 pg/mL 90 pg/mL 10–60 pg/mL
IGF-1 798 ng/mL 280 ng/mL 100–300 ng/mL (age-dependent)
Prolactin 643 ng/mL 42 ng/mL 5–25 ng/mL
Morning Urine Cortisol Elevated Normal <50 mcg/24 h
Random Blood Sugar 22 mmol/L 6.5 mmol/L 4.0–7.8 mmol/L
2-Hour Postprandial Blood Sugar 27 mmol/L 7.0 mmol/L <7.8 mmol/L
TSH (Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone) 0.8 mIU/L 1.2 mIU/L 0.5–5.0 mIU/L
FT3 (Free Triiodothyronine) 4.5 pmol/L 4.0 pmol/L 3.5–7.7 pmol/L
FT4 (Free Thyroxine) 15 pmol/L 16 pmol/L 12–22 pmol/L
Secondary diabetes mellitus is a common trouble in sufferers with Cushing disease and acromegaly, stemming from the insulin resistance brought about by persistent hypercortisolism and hypersecretion of GH. This patient’s multiplied blood sugar also reflects tremendous impairment in glucose metabolism. Polyuria, polydipsia, and unexplained weight loss are classic signs of diabetes that could have been found in her clinical history but are frequently overshadowed by the traits of the more distinguished functions of her endocrine disorders. The affected person additionally experienced galactorrhea, an odd milk discharge from the breasts, that’s on account of her expanded prolactin levels (643 ng/mL, ordinary range: 2-29 ng/mL). Hyperprolactinemia inside the context of a pituitary macroadenoma can result from the tumor’s direct secretion of prolactin or from the stalk effect, where the tumor compresses the pituitary stalk, disrupting dopamine inhibition of prolactin secretion.
MRI was the primary imaging modality, revealing a large pituitary macroadenoma centered within the sella turcica and extending suprasellar. The tumor demonstrated homogeneous postcontrast enhancement and exerted mass effects, including optic chiasm compression correlating with bitemporal hemianopia. Other modalities, such as CT, were not considered due to MRI’s superior resolution for pituitary evaluation.
The MRI scans of the patient reveal a large, well-defined pituitary macroadenoma centered within the sella turcica, exhibiting significant suprasellar extension. On sagittal T1-weighted postcontrast imaging (Fig. 1), the lesion demonstrates homogeneous enhancement with clear, well-defined borders, expanding superiorly into the suprasellar region. Coronal T2-weighted images (Fig. 2) further delineate this suprasellar extension, with the mass exerting mass effect on adjacent structures.
Fig 1:

  1. Download: Download high-res image (309KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Fig. 1. This sagittal T1-weighted postcontrast MRI of the brain, specifically focusing on the sella turcica region, reveals a large, homogeneously enhancing mass centered within the sella turcica, consistent with a pituitary macroadenoma. The mass exhibits clear, well-defined borders and appears to expand the sella, with extension into the suprasellar region (marked by circle).

Fig 2:

  1. Download: Download high-res image (522KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Fig. 2. This image shows MRI scan of the brain in coronal T2-weighted images which reveals large suprasellar mass (marked by circles).

Additional sagittal T1-weighted postcontrast imaging (Fig. 3) confirms the uniform enhancement of the macroadenoma, filling the sella turcica and extending upward. Coronal T2-weighted MRI (Fig. 4) reveals the lesion as hyperintense, extending into the suprasellar region and displacing the optic chiasm. The imaging highlights the well-defined borders of the mass and the potential mass effect on adjacent structures.
Fig 3:

  1. Download: Download high-res image (618KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Fig. 3. Sagittal T1-weighted postcontrast MRI depicting a large, homogeneously enhancing pituitary macroadenoma within the sella turcica, expanding into the suprasellar region with well-defined borders (marked by arrows).

Fig 4:

  1. Download: Download high-res image (1MB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Fig. 4. Coronal T2-weighted MRI demonstrating a large, hyperintense pituitary macroadenoma within the sella turcica, extending into the suprasellar region (marked by arrows). The lesion displaces the optic chiasm and exhibits well-defined borders, suggesting potential mass effect.

Axial T2-weighted MRI images (Fig. 5) depict a hyperintense lesion in the basal ganglia and thalamus, appearing as a bright, well-defined signal. This finding suggests a potential coexisting pathology affecting deep brain structures, which may or may not be related to the primary pituitary lesion. The characteristics and location of the pituitary macroadenoma correspond with the patient’s clinical presentation of bitemporal hemianopia, likely caused by compression of the optic chiasm.
Fig 5:

  1. Download: Download high-res image (537KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Fig. 5. Axial T2-weighted MRI images of the brain showing a hyperintense lesion in the region of the basal ganglia and thalamus, indicated by white arrows. The lesion appears as a well-defined, bright signal, suggestive of a pathology affecting deep brain structure.

The overall imaging features, including homogeneous enhancement, well-defined borders, and suprasellar extension, are hallmark characteristics of pituitary macroadenomas. The potential lateral extension toward the cavernous sinus warrants further evaluation, while the hyperintense lesion in the basal ganglia and thalamus may indicate secondary effects or unrelated CNS pathology.
The imaging findings collectively support the diagnosis of a large, functioning pituitary macroadenoma, exceeding 10 mm in diameter. The mass’s size and anatomical impact align with the patient’s clinical presentation, which includes headaches, visual field deficits, and hormonal imbalances. The documented compression of the optic chiasm and possible involvement of the cavernous sinus provide a radiological explanation for the patient’s visual symptoms and hormonal disruptions. This MRI assessment substantiates the diagnosis of a pituitary macroadenoma with significant suprasellar extension and compression effects, consistent with the patient’s symptomatology and clinical findings.
The conglomeration of her clinical presentations, elevated hormone levels, and MRI findings of a big suprasellar mass pretty suggestive of a pituitary macroadenoma showed the analysis of a functioning pituitary adenoma. The preliminary treatment control with octreotide, a somatostatin analog, aimed to control both acromegaly and Cushing disorder by inhibiting GH and ACTH secretion. However, the suboptimal reaction highlighted the undertaking of achieving hormone manipulation in sufferers with massive, competitive adenomas.
Given the patient’s persistent symptoms and the insufficient biochemical response to medical therapy, surgical intervention was considered imperative. The patient underwent endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of the pituitary gland, a minimally invasive surgical approach targeting the tumor via the nasal passages. This approach was preferred over traditional craniotomy due to its demonstrated efficacy in reducing tumor size and lowering elevated hormone levels with fewer complications, reduced morbidity, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery times. Additionally, the endoscopic technique offers superior visualization of the surgical field, which aids in precise tumor resection and preservation of normal pituitary tissue.
During the surgery, the tumor was noted to be soft and well-circumscribed, with no significant adherence to adjacent structures such as the cavernous sinus or optic chiasm. This facilitated a complete resection of the tumor, minimizing the risk of residual disease. There were no notable intraoperative complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage or significant bleeding, underscoring the safety and efficacy of the chosen approach. Postoperatively, the patient demonstrated marked clinical improvement in her symptoms, accompanied by a significant reduction in hormone levels to within normal reference ranges. This confirmed the diagnosis and highlighted the effectiveness of the surgical intervention. Specifically, there was a substantial decrease in ACTH, IGF-1, and prolactin levels, leading to clinical remission of Cushing disease and acromegaly.
In the postoperative period, the patient did not require immediate hormone replacement therapy, as her endocrine functions remained stable. However, long-term monitoring is planned to assess for potential hormone deficiencies, disease recurrence, or other complications. The follow-up plan includes regular clinical evaluations, hormonal assays, and periodic imaging studies to ensure sustained remission and to promptly address any residual or recurrent tumor growth. This case highlights the crucial role of surgical intervention in managing functional pituitary macroadenomas, particularly when medical therapy fails. The successful outcome underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and the need for lifelong surveillance to optimize long-term outcomes for such patients. This case scenario also underscores the complexities interwoven in diagnosing and coping with hyperpituitarism because of a pituitary macroadenoma, emphasizing the warrant for a complete and multidisciplinary approach. Early recognition of symptoms, correct diagnostic workup, and timely endocrine disorders.

Discussion

The case of this 30-year-old woman with concurrent refractory Cushing disease and acromegaly due to a functional pituitary macroadenoma highlights the challenges inherent in diagnosing and managing multiple endocrine disorders. Recognizing overlapping clinical features was central to reaching the diagnosis. Classic symptoms of Cushing disease, such as a moon face and central obesity, coupled with acromegalic features, including enlarged extremities, underscored the complexity of the case. The presence of bitemporal hemianopia further pointed to a large pituitary mass compressing the optic chiasm, necessitating imaging studies for confirmation. This case underscores the need for clinicians to remain vigilant when evaluating overlapping endocrine features to avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment [[18][19][20]].
Laboratory evaluations were pivotal, revealing markedly elevated ACTH, IGF-1, and prolactin levels, in addition to evidence of hypercortisolism and secondary diabetes mellitus. These findings highlighted the intricate interplay of hypersecreted pituitary hormones and the systemic consequences of unregulated hormone production. MRI findings of a large suprasellar pituitary tumor were instrumental in confirming the diagnosis of a functional macroadenoma and guided subsequent treatment decisions.
The patient’s suboptimal response to octreotide therapy underscored the limitations of medical treatments in addressing aggressive, hormone-secreting pituitary macroadenomas. While somatostatin analogs are effective in many cases of acromegaly and can provide symptomatic relief, their efficacy is limited in patients with large adenomas and significant hormonal hypersecretion. This case highlights the necessity of early consideration of definitive surgical intervention when medical therapy fails to achieve adequate biochemical control [[21][22][23]].
Endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery was selected for this patient due to its minimally invasive approach, superior visualization of the sellar region, and lower complication rates compared to traditional craniotomy. Intraoperatively, the tumor’s soft consistency and lack of adherence to adjacent structures facilitated a complete resection. Notably, the absence of significant complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage or vascular injury, reflected the safety and precision of this surgical approach [[24][25][26]].
Postoperatively, the patient experienced substantial improvement in symptoms, with normalization of ACTH, IGF-1, and prolactin levels. This outcome underscores the efficacy of surgical intervention in achieving hormonal remission and alleviating symptoms in patients with functional macroadenomas. The resolution of her secondary diabetes mellitus and galactorrhea further reinforced the success of treatment [[27][28][29]].
Managing such complex endocrine disorders necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, with endocrinologists, radiologists, and neurosurgeons collaborating to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. Radiologists play a critical role in identifying and characterizing pituitary tumors, while endocrinologists monitor hormonal responses and guide perioperative management [[30][31][32]]. Neurosurgeons provide expertise in resecting these challenging lesions and optimizing patient outcomes.
The prognosis for patients undergoing surgical resection of functional pituitary macroadenomas is generally favorable when hormonal remission is achieved. However, long-term follow-up is critical to monitor for potential disease recurrence and manage any residual hormone deficiencies. Lifelong surveillance, including periodic hormonal assays and imaging studies, is recommended. Although the patient did not require immediate hormone replacement therapy, ongoing assessment of endocrine function remains essential to address emerging deficiencies promptly [[33][34][35][36]].
This case exemplifies the importance of integrating current evidence-based practices into patient care. Recent guidelines and studies emphasize the role of endoscopic surgery as the preferred approach for resecting pituitary tumors due to its high success rates and reduced morbidity compared to older techniques.

Conclusion

This case highlights the pivotal role of surgical intervention in managing hormone-resistant pituitary macroadenomas underscoring the role of a multidisciplinary approach involving endocrinology, radiology, and neurosurgery, demonstrating its effectiveness in resolving hormonal overproduction and alleviating symptoms. Long-term follow-up is indispensable to monitor for recurrence, address emerging complications, and ensure sustained remission, reinforcing the need for vigilance and specialized endocrine care in managing these complex disorders.

Patient consent

Written informed consent for publication of this case report was obtained from the patient(s). The patient(s) were provided with sufficient information regarding the nature of the publication, including the details to be disclosed and potential implications. The patient(s) have confirmed their understanding and voluntarily agreed to the publication of this case report.

References

Cited by (0)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Avascular Necrosis in Patients With Cushing Syndrome

Abstract

Cushing syndrome (CS) results from prolonged exposure to excess glucocorticoids, leading to a range of clinical manifestations including avascular necrosis (AVN), a rare complication of CS. Although AVN is often associated with exogenous glucocorticoid treatment, it can occur in endogenous CS but may be unrecognized because of its rarity and possibly from a subclinical presentation. We describe a case of a 71-year-old male with florid Cushing disease who initially presented with bilateral hip AVN and later developed bilateral shoulder AVN despite achieving biochemical remission following transsphenoidal surgery and adjuvant stereotactic photon radiosurgery. AVN in endogenous CS is underreported, and guidance on routine screening is lacking. Our case underscores the importance of considering AVN in patients with CS, especially in those with persistent or recurrent joint symptoms and markedly elevated cortisol levels. Early detection of AVN is crucial as it can lead to irreversible joint damage and disability if untreated. Screening strategies should be explored to identify high-risk patients who are diagnosed with CS for timely intervention, thereby preventing long-term morbidity associated with AVN.

Introduction

Cushing syndrome (CS) results from prolonged exposure to excess glucocorticoids, either from exogenous glucocorticoids or endogenous sources. In endogenous CS, hypercortisolism may be due to an ACTH-dependent process, most often from a corticotroph adenoma in Cushing disease (CD) or from ectopic ACTH secretion from neuroendocrine tumors or other solid tumors such as small cell lung carcinoma. On the other hand, ACTH-independent CS is mainly driven from adrenal pathology including adrenal adenomas, adrenocortical carcinomas, adrenal hyperplasia, and primary pigmented micronodular disease [1]. The presenting symptoms and signs of CS include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, weight gain, facial plethora, dorsocervical fat pads, muscle weakness, and osteoporosis, most of which may be detected on physical examination or diagnosed biochemically. A less common symptom is avascular necrosis (AVN) of bone tissue [12], which can present with pain or point tenderness of the hip or other joints as well as present subclinically [3].

AVN of the hip results from compromised blood supply to the bone tissue and usually impacts the hips and shoulders. This leads to necrosis of hematopoietic cells, adipocytes, and osteocytes. Subsequently, bone repair processes are activated, with differentiation of mesenchymal cells into osteoblasts to build new bone and hematopoietic stem cells into osteoclasts to remove necrotic tissue. However, because of impaired bone resorption and formation, subchondral fractures eventually occur [4]. Exogenous glucocorticoid treatment is 1 of the most common causes of AVN and may account for up to 38% of atraumatic AVN and is dose dependent [5]. Glucocorticoid treatment is theorized to cause AVN through increased systemic lipids, leading to compromised perfusion to the femoral head resulting from fat emboli or external lipocyte compression, as well as alterations in the inflammatory cytokines resulting in osteoclast activation and osteoblast apoptosis [46]. Compared to exogenous glucocorticoid treatment, AVN caused by endogenous hypercortisolism is not frequently reported nor is it screened for on diagnosis of CS.

We describe a patient who presented with bilateral hip AVN in the context of florid CD. We aim to highlight this presenting feature to heighten awareness for screening for this progressive condition, which can potentially lead to joint damage, loss of mobility, and long-term disability.

Case Presentation

A 71-year-old male with medical history of active tobacco use and obstructive sleep apnea was diagnosed with new-onset hypertension during an annual health visit. He was started on antihypertensive medications (losartan, hydrochlorothiazide, and spironolactone) by his primary care doctor, but the hypertension remained uncontrolled. Over the course of 2 months, the patient developed progressive lower extremity edema and was started on furosemide, which led to hypokalemia and was subsequently discontinued. He clinically deteriorated, with progressive anasarca and dyspnea, and then developed acute left eye ptosis and diplopia and was admitted to the hospital. The patient also endorsed irritability, mood swings, easy bruising, low libido, increased appetite, 30-lb weight gain, and bilateral hip pain.

Diagnostic Assessment

Physical examination was significant for oral candidiasis, dorsocervical fat pad, facial plethora, proximal muscle weakness, and bilateral hip tenderness. Testing confirmed ACTH-dependent CS with elevated 24-hour urine free cortisol of 1116 μg/24 hours (30788.21 nmol/24 hours) and 1171.9 μg/24 hours (32330.38 nmol/24 hours) (normal reference range, 3.5-45 μg/24 hours; 96.56-1241.46 nmol/24 hours) and ACTH of 173 pg/mL (38.06 pmol/L) and 112 pg/mL (24.64 pmol/L) (normal reference range, 7.2-63 pg/mL; 1.58-13.86 pmol/L) on 2 separate occasions. He had hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with total testosterone levels of 41 ng/dL (1.42 nmol/L) (normal reference range, 250-1100 ng/dL; 8.68-38.17 nmol/mL) and suppressed LH and FSH at <0.2 mIU/mL (<0.2 IU/L) (normal reference range, 0.6-12.1; 0.6-12/1.1 IU/L) and 0.2 mIU/mL (<0.2 IU/L) (normal reference range, 1.0-12.0 2 mIU/mL; 1.0-12.0 2 IU/L) respectively, whereas the remaining pituitary hormones were normal, although IGF-1 was low normal at 66 ng/mL (8.65 nmol/L) (normal reference range, 7.2-63 pg/mL; 1.58-13.86 pmol/L). He also had new-onset diabetes mellitus with glycated hemoglobin of 8% (<5.7%) (Table 1). Imaging of the lungs showed a 15-mm solid noncalcified nodule in the posterior right upper lobe concerning for neoplasm. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 16 × 20 × 16 mm macroadenoma invading the left cavernous sinus (Fig. 1). Additionally, pelvis computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated bilateral avascular necrosis of the capital femoral epiphysis without evidence of fracture or subchondral collapse (Fig. 2A and 2B).

Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium, using T1-weighted, turbo spin-echo revealed sequence revealed a 16 × 20 × 16 mm macroadenoma invading the left cavernous sinus (white arrow).

Figure 1.

Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium, using T1-weighted, turbo spin-echo revealed sequence revealed a 16 × 20 × 16 mm macroadenoma invading the left cavernous sinus (white arrow).

Coronal inversion recovery image bilateral hips demonstrates geographic lesions bilateral femoral heads with serpentine borders consistent with bilateral femoral head bone infarcts. No subchondral collapse or arthritic changes identified (A). Axial proton density with fat saturation image bilateral hips demonstrates geographic lesions bilateral femoral heads with serpentine borders consistent with bilateral femoral head bone infarcts. No subchondral collapse or arthritic changes identified (B). Coronal T1 image of the right shoulder demonstrates geographic lesion medial humeral head with serpentine border consistent with bone infarct. No subchondral collapse or arthritic changes identified (C). Coronal T1 image of the left shoulder demonstrates geographic lesion medial humeral head with serpentine border consistent with bone infarct. No subchondral collapse or arthritic changes identified (D) (white arrows).

Figure 2.

Coronal inversion recovery image bilateral hips demonstrates geographic lesions bilateral femoral heads with serpentine borders consistent with bilateral femoral head bone infarcts. No subchondral collapse or arthritic changes identified (A). Axial proton density with fat saturation image bilateral hips demonstrates geographic lesions bilateral femoral heads with serpentine borders consistent with bilateral femoral head bone infarcts. No subchondral collapse or arthritic changes identified (B). Coronal T1 image of the right shoulder demonstrates geographic lesion medial humeral head with serpentine border consistent with bone infarct. No subchondral collapse or arthritic changes identified (C). Coronal T1 image of the left shoulder demonstrates geographic lesion medial humeral head with serpentine border consistent with bone infarct. No subchondral collapse or arthritic changes identified (D) (white arrows).

Table 1.

Laboratory evaluation of the patient at presentation

Lab Value Reference Range
Conventional units (Système International units)
ACTH 173 pg/mL (38.06 pmol/L) 7.2-63 pg/mL (1.58-13.86 pmol/L)
24-h urine free cortisol 1116 μg/24 h (30,788.21 nmol/24 h) 4.0-55.0 μg/24 h (110.35-1517.34 nmol/24 h)
Total testosterone 41 ng/mL (1.42 nmol/L) 250-1100 ng/mL (8.68-38.17 nmol/L)
Free testosterone 12.3 pg/mL (0.07 nmol/L) 30.0-135.0 pg/mL (0.17-0.79 nmol/L)
LH <0.2 mIU/mL (<0.2 IU/L) 0.6-12.1 mIU/mL (0.6-12.1 IU/L)
FSH 0.2 mIU/mL (0.2 IU/L) 1-12 mIU/mL (1-12 IU/L)
Prolactin 9.6 ng/mL (9.6 μg/L) 3.5-19.4 ng/mL (3.5-19.4 μg/L)
TSH 0.746 mIU/L 0.450-5.330 mIU/L
Free T4 0.66 ng/dL (8.49 pmol/L) 0.61-1.60 ng/dL (7.85-20.59 pmol/L
IGF-1
Z score
66 ng/mL (8.65 nmol/L)
−0.9
34-245 ng/mL (4.45-32.09 nmol/L)
−2.0 to +2.0
HbA1c 8.2% <5.7%

Abbreviations: Hb A1c, hemoglobin A1C.

Treatment

Prophylactic treatment was started with subcutaneous heparin for anticoagulation and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for opportunistic infections. Orthopedic evaluation did not recommend acute intervention for the hip AVN. Given the pituitary macroadenoma on imaging and left cranial nerve VI palsy, it was determined that the patient likely had CD, so he underwent transsphenoidal surgery. Surgical pathology confirmed the adenoma was ACTH positive, sparsely granulated, with Ki-67 index of 4%, and without increased mitotic activity (Fig. 3).

Hematoxylin and eosin (A) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (B) stained sections show oval nuclei with “salt and pepper” chromatin and granular, ACTH-positive cytoplasm. Original magnification 250×.

Figure 3.

Hematoxylin and eosin (A) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (B) stained sections show oval nuclei with “salt and pepper” chromatin and granular, ACTH-positive cytoplasm. Original magnification 250×.

Outcome and Follow-up

Due to ongoing hypercortisolism (Table 2) and residual tumor in the left cavernous sinus, the patient underwent adjuvant treatment with stereotactic photon radiosurgery at a dose of 13 Gy targeted to the left cavernous sinus and was started on osilodrostat, an oral, reversible inhibitor of 11β-hydroxylase that drives the final step of cortisol synthesis and aldosterone synthase, which converts 11-deoxycorticosterone to aldosterone [7]. The starting dose of osilodrostat was 2 mg twice per day. As the patient developed nausea, lack of appetite, and malaise with decreasing cortisol levels, osilodrostat was reduced to 1 mg daily, and he was started on hydrocortisone replacement therapy on week 11 postoperatively (Table 3). Ultimately, both osilodrostat and hydrocortisone were discontinued following normalization of cortisol levels. Regarding the rest of the hormonal deficiencies, his total testosterone and IGF-1 levels improved to levels of 483 ng/dL (16.76 nmol/L) and 99 (12.97 nmol/L), respectively, and he did not require hormone replacement therapy. Clinically, the patient improved with resolution of his hypertension and diabetes and achieved a 38-lb weight loss. Additionally, his diplopia improved and his hip pain resolved without any restriction in mobility. However, 1 year postoperatively, the patient developed bilateral shoulder pain. MRI of the shoulders demonstrated subchondral changes in the right humeral head (Fig. 2C) and a linear area of subchondral change involving the left humeral head (Fig. 2D) consistent with AVN, as well as a bilateral high-grade supraspinatus tear and acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. He was treated with an intraarticular methylprednisolone 40-mg injection to both shoulders, with subsequent improvement of the pain and joint mobility. He also underwent a coronary artery bypass graft surgery for 3-vessel disease. The patient has otherwise maintained normal urine and salivary cortisol levels off osilodrostat or hydrocortisone, and 1 year after surgery, the ACTH (cosyntropin) stimulation test was normal. The pulmonary nodule has remained stable on serial imaging.

Table 2.

Postoperative cortisol and ACTH levels

Postoperative day
Lab Reference Range Conventional units (Système International units) 1 2 2 3 4 5
Morning cortisol 3.7-19.4 μg/dL (102.08- 535.21 nmol/L) 26 μg/dL (717.29 nmol/L) 21.5 μg/dL (593.14 nmol/L) 6 μg/dL (165.53 nmol/L) 8.1 μg/dL (223.46 nmol/L) 16.4 μg/dL (452.44 nmol/L) 21.5 μg/dL (593.14 nmol/L)
ACTH 7.2-63.3 pg/mL (1.58- 13.93 pmol/L) 72 pg/mL (15.84 pmol/L) 62 pg/mL (13.64 pmol/L)

Table 3.

Titration of osilodrostat treatment based on cortisol levels

Postoperative week
Lab Reference range Conventional units (Système International units) 8 9 11 13 15 18 22 24
ACTH 7.2-63.3 pg/mL (1.58-13.93 pmol/L) 95.6 pg/mL (21.03 pmol/L) 131 pg/mL (28.82 pmol/L) 58.8 pg/mL (12.94 pmol/L) 79.3 pg/mL (17.45 pmol/L) 79.9 pg/mL (17.58 pmol/L) 73.4 pg/mL (16.15 pmol/L) 62 pg/mL (13.64 pmol/L) 71.5 pg/mL (15.73 pmol/L)
Morning cortisol 3.7-19.4 μg/dL (102.08-535.21 nmol/L) 23.9 μg/dL (659.35 nmol/L) 18.8 μg/dL (518.65 nmol/L) 6.6 μg/dL (182.08 nmol/L) 4.5 μg/dL (124.15 nmol/L) 3.3 μg/dL (91.04 nmol/L) 2.4 μg/dL (66.21) nmol/L 8.2 μg/dL (226.22. nmol/L) 4.1 μg/dL (113.11 nmol/L)
LNSC <0.010-0.090 μg/dL (0.28-2.48 nmol/L) 0.615 μg/dL (16.97 nmol/L) 0.058 μg/dL (1.60 nmol/L) 0.041 μg/dL (1.13 nmol/L) 0.041 μg/dL (1.13 nmol/L)
UFC, 24-h 5-64 μg/24 h (137.94-1765.63 nmol/24 h) 246 μg/24 h (6786.65 nmol/24 h) 226 μg/24 h (6234.89 nmol/24 h) 2 μg/24 h (55.18. nmol/24 h)
Osilodrostat dose 2 mg BID 2 mg BID 2 mg AM
3 mg PM
2 mg BID 2 mg AM
1 mg PM
1 mg BID 1 mg daily Oslidrostat discontinued

Abbreviations: BID, twice per day; LNSC, late night salivary cortisol; UFC, urine free cortisol.

Discussion

Our patient exhibited pronounced hypercortisolism secondary to CD, with bilateral hip AVN as 1 of the presenting symptoms. Despite achieving biochemical remission of the disease and resolution of other associated symptoms, the patient was later diagnosed with bilateral shoulder AVN.

AVN caused by endogenous hypercortisolism is seldom documented, and routine screening for it is not typically conducted during the diagnosis of CS. However, AVN has been reported to be a presenting symptom in several case reports or may manifest years after the initial diagnosis [8]. Reported causes of AVN in endogenous CS include pituitary adenomas, adrenal adenomas or carcinomas, adrenal hyperplasia, or neuroendocrine tumors [8‐23] (Table 4), with some cases of AVN associated with severe hypercortisolism [1015]. Other risk factors associated with AVN include hip trauma, femoral fractures, hip dislocation, systemic lupus erythematosus in the setting of concomitant corticosteroid treatments, or vasculitis, sickle cell disease, hypercoagulability, Gaucher disease, hyperlipidemia or hypertriglyceridemia, hyperuricemia, hematological malignancies, antiretroviral medications, alcohol use, and exogenous steroid treatment [4]. Our patient had no history of hip trauma or other aforementioned comorbidities. Furthermore, during presentation, his lipid levels were normal, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 89 mg/dL (<130 mg/dL) and triglycerides of 97 mg/dL (<150 mg/dL). Therefore, it is likely that his bilateral hip and shoulder AVN was caused by severe endogenous hypercortisolism.

Table 4.

Published cases of avascular necrosis in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism

First author, year Age (y)/sex Time of diagnosis in relation to CS diagnosis AVN related symptoms Imaging modality Imaging description Diagnosis Treatment
Salazar D, 2021 [15] 38 F 3 y prior to diagnosis Right hip pain MRI
  • Right hip joint effusion and synovitis
  • Flattening of the femoral head-Subcortical edema
Adrenal adenoma Right hip arthroplasty
Madell SH, 1964 [16] 41 F 1 month before diagnosis Right shoulder pain X-ray
  • Increased density of the right humeral head with spotty areas of radiolucency
  • Early flattening and beginning of fragmentation
Adrenal adenoma Osteotomy
Anand A, 2022 [21] 47 M Bilateral hip pain MRI
  • Necrosis of bilateral femur heads
adrenocortical carcinoma
Belmahi N, 2018 [9] 28 F Progressive limping and right hip pain MRI
  • Right femoral head AVN
Pituitary adenoma Right total hip replacement
Wicks I, 1987 [10] 39 M 18 months before diagnosis Progressive hip pain and stiffens X-ray
Bone scan
  • Lucent and sclerotic regions within flattened femoral heads
  • Some loss of articular cartilage
Pituitary adenoma Conservative management
Koch C, 1999 [11] 30 F Sudden onset of severe left hip pain MRI
  • Abnormal high intensity signal changes in the bone marrow of the left femoral head
  • Joint effusion
  • Stage 2 AVN
Pituitary adenoma Immediate core decompression surgery with decongestion of the left femoral head
Premkumar M, 2013 [12] 26 F 2 y after pituitary surgery for Cushing, while on replacement steroid therapy Progressive bilateral hip pain resulting in difficulty in walking MRI
  • Bilateral multiple bony infarcts in the proximal femur and distal femur
  • Femoral head collapse fractures -Stage 2 avascular necrosis
Pituitary adenoma
Bauddh N, 2022 [13] 24 M 2 y prior to diagnosis Progressive left hip pain and difficulty in walking X-ray
MRI
  • Left femoral head AVN
Pituitary adenoma Planned for surgery of hip AVN
Joseph A, 2022 [14] 21 F 1 y prior to diagnosis Bilateral hip joint pain X-ray
MRI
  • Ill-defined mixed sclerotic and lytic pattern of the femoral heads
  • Cortical disruption of the round contour
  • Low signal intensity in the subchondral region of the femoral necks on T1-weighted images
Pituitary adenoma Planned for total hip replacement.
Bisphosphonates.
Pazderska A, 2016 [19] 36 F Right leg pain MRI
  • Bilateral AVN of the femoral heads
  • Left femoral head with early bone fragmentation
Bilateral primary pigmented micronodular adrenal disease Spontaneous healing of AVN after adrenalectomy.
Papadakis G, 2017 [22] 55 F MRI
PET/CT 68Ga-DOTATATE
  • Bilateral AVN
  • Bone marrow edema extending to the intertrochanteric area
  • Mild subchondral femoral head collapse of the left hip
  • Increased activity in bilateral femoral heads and in the bone marrow consistent with edema
  • Mild left femoral head collapse
Ectopic ACTH- secreting tumor
Phillips K, 1986 [8] 24 F 4.5 y after diagnosis Right femoral AVN X-ray
  • Flattening and sclerosis of femoral head
Cushing disease
25 F 4 y after diagnosis Right femoral AVN
  • Subchondral lucency
43 F 8 mo after diagnosis Right humeral AVN
  • Sclerosis and flattening of articular surface of humeral head
61 F 11 y after diagnosis Left femoral AVN and bilateral humeral heads
  • Cortical indistinctness and subchondral lucency
  • Left humeral head flattening and sclerosis
Cerletty J, 1973 [20] 54 M 3 mo before diagnosis Right femoral head fracture X-ray
  • Bilateral subchondral sclerosis of the femoral heads
  • Some narrowing of the joint space on the left
  • Infraction of the margin of the right femoral head
  • Femoral neck fracture.
Bilateral adrenal cortical hyperplasia Total hip joint arthroplasty
Ha J-S, 2019 [18] 36 F 2 y before diagnosis 2 mo left hip restricted range of motion X-ray
MRI
  • Right femoral head with areas of hyperlucency and surrounding sclerosis
  • Subtle changes in the shape of the articular surface
  • Bilateral femoral head osteonecrosis -Increased amount of joint fluid and bone marrow edema in the left hip
  • Right femoral head necrosis
Adrenal cortical adenoma Total hip replacement
Takada, J, 2004 [17] 55 F Intense right hip pain and a limp MRI
  • Low-intensity band on T1-weighted images
  • Stage 2 AVN.
Adrenal adenoma Total hip arthroplasty
Modlinger RS, 1972 [23] 69 F Increased pain of right shoulder X-ray
  • Bilateral shoulders with aseptic necrosis of the humeral heads
Ectopic ACTH secretion NET form pancreatic tumor

Abbreviations: AVN, avascular necrosis; F, female; M, male; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NET, neuroendocrine tumor.

AVN can result in irreversible femoral head collapse, leading to severe limitation in movement, reduced joint functionality, and decreased quality of life [24]. Initially, patients may be asymptomatic or endorse nonspecific pain when presenting with AVN and may not be diagnosed until an advanced stage when they develop more severe pain and disability [25]. In a meta-analysis assessing the prevalence of AVN in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, including those who received corticosteroid treatment, asymptomatic AVN was detected in 29% of patients and symptomatic disease was noted in 9% [26]. AVN can diagnosed with MRI or CT imaging. Although noncontrast MRI has higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting early stages of the disease, CT is comparable to MRI in more advanced stages. Ancillary imaging modalities include plain radiography, positron emission tomography, and bone scan [27].

Staging of AVN relies on radiologic features and size of lesions. In earlier stages, imaging can be normal (stage 0) or with subtle abnormalities on MRI or bone scan and normal radiography (stage 1). As the disease progresses, structural changes, including cystic and sclerotic changes (stage 2), subchondral collapse (stage 3), flattening of the femoral head (stage 4), joint narrowing and acetabular changes (stage 5), and, finally, advanced degenerative changes (stage 6) can be detected on most imaging modalities.

Management of early stages of AVN includes observation or conservative weight-bearing management, medical therapy with bisphosphonates, anticoagulation therapy, statins, and vasodilators. Invasive procedures such as mesenchymal stem cells implantation, osteotomy, surgical joint decompression, and total hip replacement are reserved for more advanced stages [28]. Indeed, AVN accounts for approximately 10% of total hip replacements in the United States [29]. Staging has prognostic implications for treatment options and disease outcomes. Early-stage disease, when diagnosed and treated, can often regress, and be cured. Conservative measures, medical treatment, biophysical stimulation, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, or core decompression, can prevent femoral head collapse and further hip arthroplasty. On the other hand, late-stage disease, characterized by joint collapse, is irreversible and often requires joint replacement [30].

Although actual prevalence rates of AVN in endogenous CS is unknown, one should consider screening for AVN in this high-risk population, particularly in patients showing markedly elevated cortisol levels, as in our case. Such an approach would facilitate the early identification of individuals who would benefit from earlier medical or surgical interventions, thereby preventing permanent joint destruction and chronic disability.

Learning Points

  • AVN can be a complication of endogenous hypercortisolism.
  • AVN may present asymptomatically or with nonspecific symptoms such as joint pain.
  • AVN can affect multiple joints, including hips and shoulders, and its early diagnosis relies on MRI or CT imaging.
  • Early detection and intervention for AVN are crucial to prevent irreversible joint damage and disability.
  • Screening for AVN in patients with CS should be considered to enable timely intervention and prevent long-term complications, particularly in patients with hip or shoulder pain and severe hypercortisolism.

Contributors

All authors made individual contributions to authorship. N.T. and O.C. were involved in the diagnosis and management of the patient and manuscript submission. S.B. was involved in the histopathology section and preparation of histology images. T.L. was involved in the interpretation and preparation of the radiology images. A.N.M. was responsible for the patient’s surgery and treatment plan. All authors reviewed and approved the final draft.

Funding

No public or commercial funding.

Disclosures

Dr. Odelia Cooper is an Editorial Board member for JCEM Case Reports and played no role in the journal’s evaluation of the manuscript. There are no other disclosures to declare.

Informed Patient Consent for Publication

Signed informed consent obtained directly from patient.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

  • AVN

    avascular necrosis

  • CD

    Cushing disease

  • CS

    Cushing syndrome

  • CT

    computed tomography

  • MRI

    magnetic resonance imaging

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. See the journal About page for additional terms.

Oncocytic Pituicytoma in a Patient with Cushing’s Disease

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

1) Background: Posterior pituitary tumors (PPTs) are extremely rare, with fewer than 400 cases reported to date. In 2022, the WHO classified four types of tumors originating from the posterior pituitary: traditional pituicytoma, oncocytic pituicytoma, granular pituicytoma, and ependymal pituicytoma. To our knowledge, only one subject with coexistence of Cushing’s disease and oncocytic pituicytoma (spindle cell oncocytoma) has been reported, but the clinical features of this patient were not described in detail.

2) Case presentation: We presented a case of a patient with Cushing’s syndrome and a pituitary mass. Transsphenoidal surgery was performed, and pathologic examination revealed two distinct tumors: a corticotroph adenoma with a diameter of less than 2mm and a larger oncocytic pituicytoma. Post-surgery serum cortisol was 51 nmol/L, indicating complete remission. Corticotroph adenoma or corticotroph hyperplasia were identified after surgery in less than half of the subjects with Cushing’s disease and PPT. (3)

Conclusions: Our study indicates that Cushing’s disease in patients with PPT may be caused by the existence of collision lesions, with corticotroph adenoma or hyperplasia being difficult to detect due to their small dimensions.

Keywords: Cushing’s disease, oncocytic pituicytoma, Spindle cell oncocytoma, pituitary adenoma, Posterior pituitary tumors

Received: 27 Aug 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Chen, Tan, Yu, Tang, Cai and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Huiwen Tan, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Ying Tang, Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
Bowen Cai, Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
Jianwei Li, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

 

From https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2025.1487120/abstract

 

Insights on Diagnosing and Managing Cushing’s Syndrome

Cushing’s syndrome, or endogenous hypercortisolemia, is a rare condition that both general practice clinicians and endocrinologists should be prepared to diagnose and treat. Including both the pituitary and adrenal forms of the disease, the Endocrine Society estimates that the disorder affects 10 to 15 people per million every year in the United States. It is more common in women and occurs most often in people between the ages of 20 and 50.

Even though Cushing’s remains a rare disease, cortisol recently made waves at the American Diabetes Association 84th Scientific Session. A highlight of the meeting was the initial presentation of data from the CATALYST trial, which assessed the prevalence of hypercortisolism in patients with difficult-to-control type 2 diabetes (A1c 7.5+).

CATALYST is a prospective, Phase 4 study with two parts. In the prevalence phase, 24% of 1,055 enrolled patients had hypercortisolism, defined as an overnight dexamethasone suppression test (ODST) value greater than 1.8 µg/dL and dexamethasone levels greater than 140 µg/dL. Results of CATALYST’s randomized treatment phase are expected in late 2024.

Elena Christofides, MD, FACE, founder of Endocrinology Associates, Inc., in Columbus, OH, believes the CATALYST results will be a wake-up call for both physicians and patients seeking to advocate for their own health. “This means that nearly 1 in 4 patients with type 2 diabetes have some other underlying hormonal/endocrine dysfunction as the reason for their diabetes, or significant contribution to their diabetes, and they should all be screened,” she said. “All providers need to get comfortable with diagnosing and treating hypercortisolemia, and you need to do it quickly because patients are going to pay attention as well.”

In Dr. Christofides’ experience, patients who suspect they have a hormonal issue may start with their primary care provider or they may self-refer to an endocrinologist. “A lot of Cushing’s patients are getting diagnosed and treated in primary care, which is completely appropriate. But I’ve also met endocrinologists who are uncomfortable diagnosing and managing Cushing’s because it is so rare,” she said. “The important thing is that the physician is comfortable with Cushing’s or is willing to put in the work get comfortable with it.”

According to Dr. Christofides, the widespread popular belief that “adrenal fatigue” is causing millions of Americans to feel sick, tired, and debilitated may be creating barriers to care for people who may actually have Cushing’s. “As physicians, we know that adrenal fatigue doesn’t exist, but we should still be receptive to seeing patients who raise that as a concern,” said Dr. Christofides. “We need to acknowledsalige their lived experience as being very real and it can be any number of diseases causing very real symptoms. If we don’t see these patients, real cases of hypercortisolemia could be left undiagnosed and untreated.”

Dr. Christofides, who also serves as a MedCentral Editor-at-Large, said she reminds colleagues that overnight dexamethasone suppression test (ODST) should always be the first test when you suspect Cushing’s. “While technically a screening test, the ODST can almost be considered diagnostic, depending on how abnormal the result is,” she noted. “But I always recommend that you do the ODST, the ACTH, a.m. cortisol, and the DHEAS levels at the same time because it allows you to differentiate more quickly between pituitary and adrenal problems.”

Dr. Christofides does see a place for 24-hour urine collection and salivary cortisol testing at times when diagnosing and monitoring patients with Cushing’s. “The 24-hour urine is only positive in ACTH-driven Cushing’s, so an abnormal result can help you identify the source, but too many physicians erroneously believe you can’t have Cushing’s if the 24-hour urine is normal,” she explained. “Surgeons tend to want this test before they operate and it’s a good benchmark for resolution of pituitary disease.” She reserves salivary cortisol testing for cases when the patient’s ODST is negative, but she suspects Cushing’s may be either nascent or cyclical.

Surgical resection has long been considered first-line treatment in both the pituitary and adrenal forms of Cushing’s. For example, data shared from Massachusetts General Hospital showed that nearly 90% of patients with microadenomas did not relapse within a 30-year period. A recent study found an overall recurrence rate of about 25% within a 10-year period. When reoperation is necessary, remission is achieved in up to 80% of patients.

As new medications for Cushing’s syndrome have become available, Dr. Christofides said she favors medical intervention prior to surgery. “The best part about medical therapy is you can easily stop it if you’re wrong,” she noted. “I would argue that every patient with confirmed Cushing’s deserves nonsurgical medical management prior to a consideration of surgery to improve their comorbidities and surgical risk management, and give time to have a proper informed consent discussion.”

In general, medications to treat Cushing’s disease rely on either cortisol production blockade or receptor blockade, said Dr. Christofides. Medications that directly limit cortisol production include ketoconazoleosilodrostat (Isturisa), mitotane (Lysodren), levoketoconazole (Recorlev), and metyrapone (Metopirone). Mifepristone (Korlym, Mifeprex) is approved for people with Cushing’s who also have type 2 diabetes to block the effects of cortisol. Mifepristone does not lower the amount of cortisol the body makes but limits its effects. Pasireotide (Signifor) lowers the amount of ACTH from the tumor. Cabergoline is sometimes used off-label in the US for the same purpose.

Following surgery, people with Cushing’s need replacement steroids until their adrenal function resumes, when replacement steroids must be tapered. But Dr. Christofides said she believes that all physicians who prescribe steroids should have a clear understanding of when and how to taper patients off steroids.

“Steroid dosing for therapeutic purposes is cumulative in terms of body exposure and the risk of needing to taper. A single 2-week dose of steroids in a year does not require a taper,” she said. “It’s patients who are getting repeated doses of more than 10 mg of prednisone equivalent per day for 2 or more weeks multiple times per year who are at risk of adrenal failure without tapering.”

Physicians often underestimate how long a safe, comfortable taper can take, per Dr. Christofides. “It takes 6 to 9 months for the adrenals to wake up so if you’re using high-dose steroids more frequently, that will cause the patient to need more steroids more frequently,” she explained. “If you’re treating an illness that responds to steroids and you stop them without tapering, the patient’s disease will flare, and then a month from then to 6 weeks from then you’ll be giving them steroids again, engendering a dependence on steroids by doing so.”

When developing a steroid taper plan for postoperative individuals with Cushing’s (and others), Dr. Christofides suggests basing it on the fact that 5 mg of prednisone or its equivalent is the physiologic dose. “Reduce the dose by 5 mg per month until you get to the last 5 mg, and then you’re going to reduce it by 1 mg monthly until done,” she said. “If a patient has difficulty during that last phase, consider a switch to hydrocortisone because a 1 mg reduction of hydrocortisone at a time may be easier to tolerate.”

Prednisone, hydrocortisone, and the other steroids have different half-lives, so you’ll need to plan accordingly, adds Dr. Christofides. “If you do a slower taper using hydrocortisone, the patient might feel worse than with prednisone unless you prescribe it BID.” She suggests thinking of the daily prednisone equivalent of hydrocortisone as 30 mg to allow for divided dosing, rather than the straight 20 mg/day conversion often used.

What happens after a patient’s Cushing’s has been successfully treated? Cushing’s is a chronic disease, even in remission, Dr. Christofides emphasized. “Once you have achieved remission, my general follow-up is to schedule visits every 6 months to a year with scans and labs, always with the instruction if the patient feels symptomatic, they should come in sooner,” she said.

More on Cushing’s diagnosis and therapies.

https://www.medcentral.com/endocrinology/cushings-syndrome-a-clinical-update