Connecting Canine and Human Health to Fight Cushing’s Disease

Posted on May 5, 2025 by MaryO

Cushing’s Disease is common in dogs but rare and hard to diagnose in people. That’s why University of Georgia researchers are leveraging canine treatments to find new solutions to battle the condition in humans. This collaboration between veterinary medicine and human health care is just one example of how UGA uses a Precision One Health approach to find and tailor new medical treatments for people and animals.

~~~

Imagine your body as a well-run newsroom. Each day, the editor-in-chief—in this case, the pituitary gland—provides assignments, keeping everything running smoothly. One day, however, the editor’s role is usurped by a rogue reporter who declares breaking news nonstop, flooding the newsroom with bulletins and sending everyone into overdrive.

This is a bit like Cushing’s Disease. The rogue reporter is a tiny, usually benign tumor, the stress bulletins cortisol. The newsroom—your body—responds with metabolic fluctuations, burnt out muscles, emotional distress, and more. Over the long haul, Cushing’s Disease can cause lasting deterioration of the body: osteoporosis, muscle weakness, high blood pressure and heart disease, diabetes, memory and mood issues, fatigue, and more.

It’s a common disease and easier to detect in canines. In people, however, it is rare and difficult to diagnose. University of Georgia researchers are leveraging canine treatments to find new solutions to battle the condition in humans.

This collaboration between veterinary medicine and human health is just one example of how UGA uses a Precision One Health approach to find and tailor new medical treatments for people and animals.

From https://research.uga.edu/news/connecting-canine-human-health-to-fight-cushings-disease/

​

Filed under: Cushing's, Video | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Day 13, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 13, 2024 by MaryO

UVA 2004
Cushing’s Conventions have always been special times for me – we learn a lot, get to meet other Cushies, even get referrals to endos!

As early as 2001 (or before) my pituitary function was dropping.  My former endo tested annually but did nothing to help me with the symptoms.

In the fall of 2002 my endo refused to discuss my fatigue or anything at all with me until I lost 10 pounds. He said I wasn’t worth treating in my overweight condition and that I was setting myself up for a heart attack. He gave me 3 months to lose this weight. Those 3 months included Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years.  Needless to say, I left his office in tears, again.

Fast forward 2 years to 2004.  I had tried for a while to get my records from this endo. He wouldn’t send them, even at doctors’ or my requests.

I wanted to go see Dr. Vance at UVa but I had no records so she wouldn’t see me until I could get them.

Finally, my husband went to the former endo’s office and threatened him with a court order. The office manager managed to come up with about 13 pages of records. For going to him from 1986 to 2001 including weeks and weeks at NIH and pituitary surgery, that didn’t seem like enough records to me.

In April of 2004, many of us from the message boards went to the UVa Pituitary Days Convention. That’s where the picture above comes in.  Other pictures from that convention are here.

By chance, we met a wonderful woman named Barbara Craven. She sat at our table for lunch on the last day and, after we learned that she was a dietitian who had had Cushing’s, one of us jokingly asked her if she’d do a guest chat for us. I didn’t follow through on this until she emailed me later. In the email, she asked how I was doing. Usually I say “fine” or “ok” but for some reason, I told her exactly how awful I was feeling.

Barbara emailed me back and said I should see a doctor at Johns Hopkins. I said I didn’t think I could get a recommendation to there, so SHE referred me. The doctor got right back to me, set up an appointment. Between his vacation and mine, that first appointment turned out to be Tuesday, Sept 14, 2004.

Just getting through the maze at Johns Hopkins was amazing. They have the whole system down to a science, moving from one place to another to sign in, then go here, then window 6, then… But it was very efficient.

My new doctor was wonderful. Understanding, knowledgeable. He never once said that I was “too fat” or “depressed” or that all this was my own fault. I feel so validated, finally.

He looked through my records, especially at my 2 previous Insulin Tolerance Tests (ITT). From those, he determined that my growth hormone has been low since at least August 2001 and I’ve been adrenal insufficient since at least Fall, 1999 – possibly as much as 17 years! I was amazed to hear all this, and astounded that my former endo not only didn’t tell me any of this, he did nothing. He had known both of these things – they were in the past records that I took with me. Perhaps that was why he had been so reluctant to share copies of those records. He had given me Cortef in the fall of 1999 to take just in case I had “stress” and that was it.

The new endo took a lot of blood (no urine!) for cortisol and thyroid stuff. I went back on Sept. 28, 2004 for arginine, cortrosyn and IGF testing.

He said that I would end up on daily cortisone – a “sprinkling” – and some form of GH, based on the testing the 28th.

For those who are interested, my new endo is Roberto Salvatori, M.D.
Assistant Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins

Medical School: Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
Residency: Montefiore Medical Center
Fellowship: Cornell University, Johns Hopkins University
Board Certification: Endocrinology and Metabolism, Internal Medicine

Clinical Interests: Neuroendocrinology, pituitary disorders, adrenal disorders

Research Interests: Control of growth hormone secretion, genetic causes of growth hormone deficiency, consequences of growth hormone deficiency.

Although I have this wonderful doctor, a specialist in growth hormone deficiency at Johns Hopkins, in November, 2004, my insurance company saw fit to over-ride his opinions and his test results based on my past pharmaceutical history! Hello??? How could I have a history of taking GH when I’ve never taken it before?

Of course, I found out late on a Friday afternoon. By then it was too late to call my case worker at the drug company, so we had to appeal on Monday. My local insurance person also worked on an appeal, but the whole thing was  just another long ordeal of finding paperwork, calling people, FedExing stuff, too much work when I just wanted to start feeling better by Thanksgiving.

As it turned out the insurance company rejected the brand of hGH that was prescribed for me. They gave me the ok for a growth hormone was just FDA-approved for adults on 11/4/04. The day this medication was approved for adults was the day after my insurance said that’s what is preferred for me. In the past, this form of hGH was only approved for children with height issues. Was I going to be a ginuea pig again?

The new GH company assigned a rep for me, submitted info to pharmacy, and waited for insurance approval, again.

I finally started the Growth Hormone December 7, 2004.

Was the hassle and 3 year wait worth it?

Stay tuned for April 15, 2016 when all will be revealed.

Read

Read Dr. Barbara Craven’s Guest Chat, October 27, 2004

Thanks for reading 🙂

MaryO

Filed under: adrenal crisis, Cushing's, Meetings and Conferences, pituitary, symptoms, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

A Medical Chart Audit to Assess Endocrinologist Perceptions of the Burden of Endogenous Cushing’s Syndrome

Posted on January 27, 2024 by MaryO

Abstract

Purpose

This study was undertaken to assess the unmet needs within the endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) care paradigm from the endocrinologist’s perspective, including data abstracted from patient charts. The study evaluated endocrinologists’ perceptions on burden of illness and treatment rationale along with the long-term clinical burden of CS, tolerability of CS treatments, and healthcare resource utilization for CS.

Methods

Retrospective medical chart data from treated patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CS was abstracted using a cross-sectional survey to collect data from qualified endocrinologists. The survey included a case report form to capture patient medical chart data and a web-enabled questionnaire to capture practitioner-level data pertaining to endocrinologists’ perceptions of disease burden, CS treatments, and treatment attributes.

Results

Sixty-nine endocrinologists abstracted data from 273 unique medical charts of patients with CS. Mean patient age was 46.5 ± 13.4 years, with a 60:40 (female:male) gender split. The mean duration of endogenous CS amongst patients was 4.1 years. Chart data indicated that patients experienced a high burden of comorbidities and symptoms, including fatigue, weight gain, and muscle weakness despite multi-modal treatment. When evaluating treatments for CS, endocrinologists rated improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as the most important treatment attribute (mean score = 7.8; on a scale of 1 = Not at all important to 9 = Extremely important). Surgical intervention was the modality endocrinologists were most satisfied with, but they agreed that there was a significant unmet treatment need for patients with CS.

Conclusion

Endocrinologists recognized that patients with CS suffered from a debilitating condition with a high symptomatic and HRQoL burden and reported that improvement in HRQoL was the key treatment attribute influencing their treatment choices. This study highlights unmet needs for patients with CS. Patients with CS have a high rate of morbidity and comorbidity, even after treatment.

Introduction

Endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is a rare, debilitating disorder caused by chronic overproduction of cortisol [1,2,3]. CS has an estimated incidence of 0.7 to 2.4 cases per million per year, with a majority of cases (~ 70%) occurring in women [1, 4, 5]. Active CS is characterized by a variety of signs and symptoms, including muscle weakness, obesity, depression, menstrual changes, facial redness, decreased libido, hirsutism, acne, ecchymoses, hypertension, diabetes, and neurocognitive deficits [6]. Because of the diverse constellation of associated symptoms, many of which are common in the general population, CS can be challenging to diagnose and patients often seek input from multiple specialists (i.e., orthopedists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, and endocrinologists) prior to receiving a correct diagnosis [6].

Current treatment options for CS include surgery as the first line of treatment, followed by pharmacotherapies as the second line option and radiation therapy, among other treatments, as a potential third line option. Pharmacotherapies include steroidogenesis inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, mitotane), glucocorticoid receptor antagonists (e.g., mifepristone), and medications that inhibit tumoral ACTH secretion (e.g., pasireotide, cabergoline) [6,7,8,9,10]. These pharmacotherapies can be administered as monotherapy or in combination.

The impact of CS on overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been previously described [11]. However, studies reporting both the patient burden (via medical charts) and physician perceptions of burden are lacking, and studies examining healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and the economic burden of CS are limited. The current study reviewed medical charts of patients with CS to characterize the overall burden of CS (including symptoms, treatments, and HCRU) as well as physician perceptions of available treatments for CS and the rationale behind associated treatment decisions.

Methods

Study design and recruitment

This quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted to collect disease burden data pertaining to patients with CS from qualified physician respondents. All study materials were reviewed and granted exemption by a central Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior to study execution (Advarra; Columbia, MD; https://www.advarra.com/). HCPs were recruited via a physician panel through an independent recruitment partner (Toluna) and received an appropriate honorarium for their time participating in the study.

This study was fielded between May 26 and July 27, 2021, and involved the abstraction of retrospective medical chart data from patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CS by endocrinologists. The survey included a 45–60-min web-enabled questionnaire, including a case report form (CRF) component, to capture patient medical chart data and health care practitioner (HCP)-level data in order to assess perceptions of CS disease burden, treatments, and attributes associated with treatments. Considering the rarity of CS, each HCP was required to abstract information from a minimum of 2 patient charts, and a maximum of 8 patient charts.

Selection of study population

HCPs were able to participate in the study if they:

  1. 1.Were board-certified or board-eligible in endocrinology in the United States.
  2. 2.Had been in practice for more than 3 years and less than 35 years post residency.
  3. 3.Spent at least 25% of their professional time providing direct patient care.
  4. 4.Had treated or managed at least 40 unique patients (of any condition) in an average month.
  5. 5.Had managed (i.e., had an appointment with) at least 3 patients with CS in the past year.
  6. 6.Had access to confirmed CS patient chart(s) at the time of the study.

Each HCP who qualified to participate provided information via chart abstraction from the medical records of 2–8 patients with CS. The selected medical charts were from patients ≥ 21 years of age who had received a physician confirmed diagnosis of CS at least 3 months before the time of the study, and had received at least one therapy (surgical, radiological, or pharmacological) to treat their CS within the past 12 months. Patients who were diagnosed with adrenal or pituitary carcinomas were excluded.

Data analysis

The data analysis was conducted in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and Q Research Software 5.6. (Q Research Software, New York, NY). After pilot interviews and throughout the fielding, quality control checks of all the case report forms were conducted to ensure that charts with logical inconsistencies were removed from the sample. Descriptive statistics (such as means, medians, and frequencies) were used to describe the study population across various patient and physician level metrics.

Results

Endocrinologists’ demographics and practice characteristics

Endocrinologists’ demographic information and practice characteristics are presented in Table 1. A total of 69 endocrinologists were surveyed and they provided information on 273 unique patient charts. The majority of the 69 endocrinologists surveyed (53/69, 73%) were male. The mean (± SD) time in practice was 17.3 (± 7.6) years. The majority of endocrinologists (35/69, 51%) worked in urban practices and were in private practice settings (47/69, 68%) (Table 1). The sample was almost equally distributed between physicians from the northern (26%), southern (29%), eastern (25%) and western (22%) regions of the United States. The mean (± SD) estimated number of patients with endogenous CS seen in the last 6 months was 30 (± 34.4) patients.

Table 1 Endocrinologist demographics and practice characteristics

aEndocrinologist were allowed to select multiple practice settings, if applicable

Patient demographics

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics at the time of the survey are shown in Table 2. The majority of patients (165/273, 60%) were female with a mean (± SD) age at diagnosis of 40.2 (± 12.3) years and a mean (± SD) age at the most recent visit of 46.5 (± 13.4) years. Mean (± SD) BMI was 33.3 (± 8.3) kg/m2, with 50.5% of patients categorized as obese, 33.0% of patients categorized as overweight, 14.7% of patients categorized as normal or healthy weight, and 1.8% of patients categorized as underweight (Table 2). Most patients (167/273, 61%) had private or commercial health insurance. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics at disease diagnosis are shown in Table 2. A majority of patients (194/273, 79%) originally saw their primary care physician (PCP) prior to diagnosis and were diagnosed in a private practice setting (182/273, 67%). At the time of diagnosis, 46/273 patients (17%) had poor health, 107/273 patients (39%) had fair health, 68/273 patients (25%) had neutral health, 45/273 patients (16%) had good health, and 7/273 patients (3%) had excellent health, according to the responding physician.

Table 2 Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and therapy experience at diagnosis and time of the study

Treatment of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome

The patient treatment experience at the time of the study is presented in Table 2. Of the 273 patients, 79 (28.9%) underwent surgery only, 11 patients (4.0%) underwent surgery and radiation therapy, 4 patients (1.4%) underwent radiation therapy and pharmacotherapy, 5 patients (1.8%) underwent surgery, radiation therapy, and pharmacotherapy, 85 patients (31.1%) underwent surgery and pharmacotherapy, 2 patients (< 1%) underwent radiation alone and 87 patients (31.9%) underwent pharmacotherapy alone.

Symptomatic burden of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome

At diagnosis, 34% of patients presented with 1–3 symptoms, 33% of patients presented with 4–6 symptoms, 20% of patients presented with 7–9 symptoms, 8% of patients presented with 10–12 symptoms, and 5% of patients presented with > 13 symptoms (Fig. 1). Symptoms of CS at the time of diagnosis are shown in Fig. 2. The top 10 most common symptoms of CS at the time of diagnosis (Fig. 3) included fatigue, weight gain (in the midsection and upper back), acne, muscle weakness, facial weight gain (i.e., facial roundness), decreased libido, headache, edema, emotional lability, and hirsutism. Although symptoms decreased post-treatment, a large proportion of subjects still exhibited these symptoms post-treatment (Fig. 3). The most commonly reported comorbidities observed in patients with CS at the time of CS diagnosis (i.e., those affecting ≥ 20% of patients) included obesity, hypertension, depression, diabetes, dyslipidemia, anxiety, and impaired glucose tolerance (Table 2).

Fig. 1

figure 1

Number of CS symptoms reported at diagnosis

Fig. 2

figure 2

Symptoms of CS at diagnosis (N = 273)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Top 10 symptoms of CS over time. Responses were restricted for Erectile Dysfunction and Irregular Menstrual Periods. Hirsutism was not restricted to females only. All denominators in the table reflect the entire patient cohort, while the metrics below are based on only the affected genders: Female Only Hirsutism: 19% of the cohort (= 52/273), 32% of the females (= 52/165), Erectile Dysfunction: 6% of the cohort (= 17/273), 16% of the males (= 17/108) and, Irregular Menstrual Period: 11% of the cohort (= 30/273), 18% of the females (= 30/165)

Economic burden of Cushing’s syndrome

Healthcare resource utilization was assessed (Table 3). Patients required a mean (± SD) of 1 (± 1.4) hospitalization annually with a mean (± SD) length of impatient stay of 4.3 (± 3.1) days. Patients required a mean (± SD) of 0.6 (± 1.3) annual emergency room (ER) visits, and 4.3 (± 6.3) outpatient visits.

Table 3 Healthcare resource utilization

Endocrinologists’ perceptions of disease burden

Endocrinologists were asked if they agreed with a series of statements regarding their perception of CS burden and impact on a scale of 1–9, where 1 = Not at all agree and 9 = Completely agree (Fig. 4). The highest proportion of endocrinologists responded “Completely agree” with the statements “CS patients can have reduced ability to function at work or school due to their condition” (percent of endocrinologists who responded “Completely agree” = 35%), “patients with CS feel the impact of their condition every day” (30%), that “CS is a debilitating condition” (28%), “patients with CS often have impaired health-related quality of life” (28%), and “CS results in sleep disturbances that adversely impact patient’s HRQoL” (26%).

Fig. 4

figure 4

Physicians’ perceptions of CS burden and impact. On a scale of 1–9, where 1 = Not at all agree and 9 = Completely agree

Endocrinologists’ treatment perceptions

Endocrinologists were asked for their perceptions of the most important treatment attributes on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = the least important and 5 = the most important (Table 4). The two most important treatment attributes included treatments that were efficacious post-surgery (mean score = 4.0) and efficacious as a combination therapy (3.7). Endocrinologists were asked to rank satisfaction with currently available treatments for CS including surgical intervention, pharmacotherapy, and radiological or other interventions on a scale of 1–9, where 1 = Not at all satisfied and 9 = Extremely satisfied (Table 5). Overall, endocrinologists reported highest satisfaction with surgical intervention with regards to initial efficacy (mean score = 7.2), durability (6.9), safety (6.3), side effects (6.2), tolerability (6.4), and patient’s overall experience (6.9). Endocrinologists also ranked pharmacotherapy higher than radiation therapy for the treatment of CS for initial efficacy (5.9 versus 5.2), safety (5.9 versus 5.4), side effects (5.3 versus 5.2), tolerability (5.7 versus 5.5), and patient’s overall experience (5.9 versus 5.4).

Table 4 Top 5 highest rated treatment attributes
Table 5 Physicians’ satisfaction across therapeutic categories

Endocrinologists’ attitudes toward treatments and interventions

Key factors for evaluating and selecting a CS treatment were rated on a scale of 1–9, with 1 = Not at all important and 9 = Extremely important (Fig. 5). Improving HRQoL (mean score = 7.8) was rated as the most important attribute. Similarly, improving cardiovascular complications/events (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke, embolism) (7.6), psychiatric symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, mood changes) (7.6), skeletal/muscular symptoms (e.g., muscular weakness, decrease in bone mineral density, bone fractures) (7.5), and neurologic symptoms (e.g., headaches, memory, and cognitive difficulties including brain fog) (7.5) were ranked as key factors when choosing CS treatment. While factors in the survey such as “causes high rate of adrenal insufficiency” and “label contains a warning against use in CS” were ranked as less important, none of the factors listed were considered unimportant by physician respondents for choosing CS treatment.

Fig. 5

figure 5

Key factors for evaluating CS treatments that influence medication selection. On a scale of 1–9, where 1 = Not at all important and 9 = Extremely important

Endocrinologists were asked if they agreed with a series of statements regarding CS treatment and intervention attitudes on a scale of 1–9, where 1 = strongly disagree and 9 = strongly agree (Table 6). The three highest scoring statements were “there is a significant clinical unmet need for patients with endogenous CS” (mean score = 6.6), “better patient support services for CS medications often leads to better patient adherence” (6.5), and “patient out of pocket cost is a significant burden for CS patients on a pharmacological therapy” (6.5). The lowest scoring statement was “patient out of pocket cost is not a significant factor when prescribing pharmacological therapy for my CS patients” (4.6).

Table 6 Physicians’ attitudes toward CS treatment and intervention

Discussion

This study provides valuable information on the physician’s perspective of unmet needs and treatment goals for patients with CS. Endocrinologists in our sample strongly agreed that patients with CS suffered from a debilitating daily condition with a high HRQoL burden. Endocrinologists also strongly agreed with the view that “there is a significant clinical unmet need for patients with endogenous CS” and ranked prescribing treatments to improve HRQoL, cardiovascular events, depression, and anxiety as key factors influencing treatment decisions. The importance providers place on the availability of post-surgery treatment options reflects the inability of many patients with CS to achieve complete post-surgical symptom resolution and suggests all symptoms in patients with CS are not currently addressed with available treatments.

Multiple treatment modalities were utilized by endocrinologists in the care of patients with CS, including surgery, pharmacotherapy, and/or radiation therapy. Improvement in HRQoL was the key treatment attribute influencing CS treatment choices, followed by the goal of reducing cardiovascular complications, and decreasing psychiatric symptoms. However, the prevalence of comorbidities after CS treatment as well as endocrinologists’ perceptions and attitudes regarding an unmet need for CS treatments and ongoing disease burden showed that few therapies are able to improve patients’ ongoing disease burden. New CS treatments are needed that have long-term efficacy, fewer side effects, and effective reimbursement.

Patients with CS have a high symptomatic disease burden at diagnosis. This study and others have demonstrated that many of these signs and symptoms (e.g., hypertension, obesity, and depression) persist even after receiving treatment aimed at normalizing cortisol levels [12,13,14,15]. Results from the present study show that many patients continue to experience fatigue, weight gain, muscle weakness, and emotional lability even after treatment, indicating an unmet need for CS treatments that can effectively manage these persistent symptoms. The persistence of symptoms after treatment for CS is likely multifactorial, and may, at least in part, be due to complications of prolonged hypercortisolism, given diagnostic and treatment delays; however, the ability to predict which patients will continue to experience persistent symptoms after treatment is challenging [14, 16, 17]. Additionally, the effects of inadequate cortisol control, symptoms due to glucocorticoid withdrawal, and side effects from medications taken to address comorbidities may contribute to persistent symptoms after treatment for CS. Although there are currently established reference values and treatment guidelines used to stratify patients, there are no current clear guidelines on management of ongoing symptoms after cortisol levels have been addressed [18]. Additionally, the present study indicated that only 32% of patients were diagnosed at the first presentation of their CS symptoms, underscoring the importance of increasing awareness of CS and its presentation among PCPs to expedite diagnosis and treatment.

The economic burden of illness from CS includes both the direct impact on HCRU, and the indirect impact on the patient due to loss of work productivity. The present study determined that the mean (± SD) annual number of hospitalization among patients with CS was 1 (± 1.4) day with an average length of inpatient stay of 4.3 days, similar in duration to the mean length of stay for all hospitalizations in the US [19]. However, the average number of outpatient visits among patients with CS was 4.3 visits per year, slightly lower than described in a recent study of patients with CS [11], but almost twice the rate of the average American, indicating a substantial direct cost burden [20]. Patients’ reduced ability to function at work or at school could limit their full economic potential, not only for themselves, but for family members and caregivers, indicating an indirect economic cost.

The degree of concordance between patients’ chart data and the perceptions of providers regarding disease symptoms is an important issue raised, but not directly addressed, by this study. Although endocrinologists agreed that there was a high HRQoL burden attributable to CS, this study did not analyze patients’ perceptions of HRQoL burden of CS. Discordance between patients’ perceptions and the perceptions of their healthcare providers, as well as the tendency of providers to perceive disease burden as less impactful or severe than is perceived by patients, has been reported in other medical conditions such as acromegaly, rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain. The result of this is often worse medical outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or worse pain and functioning in patients with chronic pain [21,22,23,24]. Further study is necessary to analyze the concordance between the perceptions of physicians and patients with CS.

A recent cross-sectional web-enabled survey burden of illness study and a recent systemic literature review [11, 25, 26], conducted by the authors of this study, elucidated both the burden of CS as well as unmet needs in the healthcare system for patients with CS. The results of the current study corroborate the findings of both of these studies, confirming that patients experience a substantial and complex burden of cumulative CS symptoms that impacts their HRQoL. Similar to prior studies, the current results also demonstrate that although symptoms improve with treatment, some symptoms such as weight gain, pain, and anxiety persist even after treatment interventions, including surgery, pharmacotherapy, and radiation therapy. Patients with CS have previously been shown to have worse HRQoL scores compared to healthy counterparts [26], underscoring the long-term effects of CS despite treatment. This study and others have demonstrated that current therapies do not completely mitigate this HRQoL burden and indicate an unmet need among many patients with CS for additional treatments to control symptoms after cortisol level normalization.

Study limitations

During the time in which this study was conducted, additional CS treatments could have been approved, potentially changing the treatment landscape, and thereby altering the proportion of patients that continued to have symptoms after treatment (Fig. 3) or the proportion of patients with a particular comorbidity after treatment. Physician response may have been subject to recall bias; although this may have been mitigated by the use of patient chart data the possibility that details were omitted at the time of patient visits exists. Additionally, when physicians were asked about working in a Center of Excellence, the term was not explicitly defined which may have led to varying interpretations by respondents. Due to the nature of the method used (i.e., a survey given to endocrinologists treating patients at the present time), we have limited historical chart data on the entire medical journey of each patient and all important medical events may not have been captured. For example, treatments administered to patients prior to this study (i.e., those administered by previous doctors or from a different hospital) may not be present in the patients’ charts and were not captured by our survey. Additionally, we did not capture biochemical data to make definitive statements on disease status based on patient cortisol levels. Updated guidelines on cortisol levels indicative of disease severity have recently been issued by the Pituitary Society [18], and a shift toward standardized clinical guidelines may help physicians provide timely and appropriate treatment for patients with CS. Future patient-centered research in CS should focus on identifying biomarkers associated with persistent symptoms after initial treatment, which could influence the development of guidelines for managing ongoing symptoms as current treatments are focused on cortisol management. The cohort of patients with CS included in our study is also not representative of the full spectrum of patients with CS as they were required to have received at least one pharmacological therapy to be eligible for the study. This requirement was added to our eligibility criteria as the aim of our study was to evaluate the burden of illness faced by patients with Cushing’s Syndrome, post-treatment, in the real world. Future studies evaluating concordance between patient chart data and physician perceptions of CS symptoms are also likely to be of interest. Finally, patient symptoms in this study could potentially have been masked due to the use of over-the-counter medications or other prescription treatments not fully captured in charts.

Conclusion

Patients with CS continue to experience symptoms such as fatigue, weight gain, muscle weakness, and emotional instability even after seeking and receiving treatment, indicating an unmet need for treatments that control symptoms. Future research is needed to develop a treatment paradigm that alleviates disease burden in patients with CS and that results in long-term disease control with a favorable side effect profile.

Data availability

The authors confirm that all pertinent data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript or Supplementary Materials.

Consent to publish

Study participants consented to the publication of their data anonymously on an aggregate basis.

References

  1. Lacroix A et al (2015) Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 386(9996):913–927

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hopkins RL, Leinung MC (2005) Exogenous Cushing’s syndrome and glucocorticoid withdrawal. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 34(2):371–384, ix

  3. NORD (2021) Cushing syndrome. NORD. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/cushing-syndrome/

  4. Wengander S et al (2019) The incidence of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome in the modern era. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 91(2):263–270

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hakami OA, Ahmed S, Karavitaki N (2021) Epidemiology and mortality of Cushing’s syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 35(1):101521

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nieman LK (2015) Cushing’s syndrome: update on signs, symptoms and biochemical screening. Eur J Endocrinol 173(4):M33–M38

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. Castinetti F, Conte-Devolx B, Brue T (2010) Medical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: glucocorticoid receptor antagonists and mifepristone. Neuroendocrinology 92(Suppl 1):125–130

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Castinetti F, Brue T, Conte-Devolx B (2012) The use of the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone in Cushing’s syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 19(4):295–299

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sharma ST, Nieman LK, Feelders RA (2015) Cushing’s syndrome: epidemiology and developments in disease management. Clin Epidemiol 7:281–293

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  10. Hinojosa-Amaya JM, Cuevas-Ramos D, Fleseriu M (2019) Medical management of Cushing’s syndrome: current and emerging treatments. Drugs 79(9):935–956

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Page-Wilson G et al (2023) Evaluating the burden of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome using a web-based questionnaire and validated patient-reported outcome measures. Pituitary 26(4):1–11

    Article Google Scholar

  12. Pivonello R et al (2016) Complications of Cushing’s syndrome: state of the art. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4(7):611–629

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Pertichetti M et al (2020) Pituitary adenomas and neuropsychological status: a systematic literature review. Neurosurg Rev 43(4):1065–1078

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Andela CD et al (2015) Mechanisms in endocrinology: Cushing’s syndrome causes irreversible effects on the human brain: a systematic review of structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Eur J Endocrinol 173(1):R1-14

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Papakokkinou E et al (2020) Excess morbidity persists in patients with Cushing’s disease during long-term remission: a Swedish nationwide study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(8):dgaa291

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros AL et al (2013) Persistence of Cushing’s disease symptoms and comorbidities after surgical cure: a long-term, integral evaluation. Endocr Pract 19(2):252–258

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Bhattacharyya A et al (2005) Steroid withdrawal syndrome after successful treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: a reminder. Eur J Endocrinol 153(2):207–210

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Fleseriu M et al (2021) Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(12):847–875

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  19. Freeman W, Weiss A, Heslin K (2018) Overview of U.S. hospital stays in 2016: variation by geographic region. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb246-Geographic-Variation-Hospital-Stays.jsp

  20. Control, C.f.D. National Center for Health Statistics (2023) Ambulatory care use and physician office visits. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/physician-visits.htm

  21. Michelsen B et al (2017) Discordance between tender and swollen joint count as well as patient’s and evaluator’s global assessment may reduce likelihood of remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: data from the prospective multicentre NOR-DMARD study. Ann Rheum Dis 76(4):708–711

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Smolen JS et al (2016) Discordance between patient and physician assessments of global disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and association with work productivity. Arthritis Res Ther 18(1):114

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  23. Geer EB et al (2020) Observed discordance between outcomes reported by acromegaly patients and their treating endocrinology medical provider. Pituitary 23(2):140–148

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Panda M et al (2006) The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Am J Med Sci 332(1):18–23

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Page-Wilson GO, Maguire A, O’Hara M, Moloney S, Eliza G (2022) Patient-reported burden of illness in endogenous Cushing’s syndrome

  26. Page-Wilson GO, Bhagyashree O, Silber A, Meyer J, O’Hara M, Geer E (2022) Physician perceptions on the treatment and health-related quality of life burden of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome

Download references

Acknowledgements

Medical editorial assistance was provided by Amal Gulaid, MPH from Trinity Life Sciences. Medical writing assistance was provided by Iona Bartek, PhD. Funding for this study was provided by Strongbridge Biopharma plc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris BioPharma Holdings, Inc.

Target Journal

Pituitary.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by Strongbridge Biopharma plc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. Gabrielle Page-Wilson, MD and Eliza B. Geer, MD were contracted by Strongbridge Biopharma, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. to provide expert guidance for this study. Bhagyashree Oak, PhD, Abigail Silber, MPH, and Mathew O’Hara, MBA are employees of Trinity Life Sciences, which was commissioned by Strongbridge Biopharma, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. to conduct the current study. James Meyer, MBA, PharmD is an employee and shareholder of Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Endocrinology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Gabrielle Page-Wilson

    1. Trinity Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA

      Bhagyashree Oak, Abigail Silber & Matthew O’Hara

    2. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA

      James Meyer

    3. Multidisciplinary Pituitary and Skull Base Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA

      Eliza B. Geer

    Contributions

    All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Study material preparation, data collection, analyses, and manuscript development were conducted by BO, AS, and MO. JM provided overall strategic guidance. GP-W and EBG provided expert reviews of the work. All authors read and approved the final published version.

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Eliza B. Geer.

    Ethics declarations

    Conflict of interest

    Funding for this study was provided by Strongbridge Biopharma plc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. Gabrielle Page-Wilson, MD and Eliza B. Geer, MD were contracted by Strongbridge Biopharma, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. to provide expert guidance for this study. Bhagyashree Oak, PhD, Abigail Silber, MPH, and Mathew O’Hara, MBA are employees of Trinity Life Sciences, which was commissioned by Strongbridge Biopharma, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. to conduct the current study. James Meyer, MBA, PharmD is an employee and shareholder of Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

    Ethical approval

    This was an observational study conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. As this was not a randomized clinical trial, the study was not registered as such. The ADVARRA Institutional Review Board (Columbia, MD; https://www.advarra.com/) has granted the study exemption from IRB oversight using the Department of Health and Human Services regulations found at 45 CFR 46.104(d)(2). The IRB also completed the necessary additional limited review considerations as set forth under the Revised Common Rule, 45 CFR 46.104(d).

    Informed consent

    Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study during the screening process and this was required to successfully enroll into the study. Participants were able to exit the study at any time or refuse to answer any questions.

    Additional information

    Publisher’s Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Filed under: Cushing's, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Adults with Cushing’s Syndrome Report High Burden Of Illness, Despite Ongoing Treatment

Posted on September 4, 2023 by MaryO

Key takeaways:

  • Cushing’s syndrome symptoms moderately impact quality of life for adults with the condition.
  • Weight gain, muscle fatigue and menstrual changes decline in severity from diagnosis to follow-up.

Adults with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome reported that the condition moderately affects their quality of life and causes them to have symptoms about 16 days in a given month, according to findings published in Pituitary.

“Our study aimed to evaluate the ongoing burden of Cushing’s syndrome in order to identify areas of unmet need,” Eliza B. Geer, MD, medical director of the Multidisciplinary Pituitary and Skull Base Tumor Center and associate attending of endocrinology and neurosurgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, told Healio. “We found that patients with treated Cushing’s continue to experience ongoing symptoms more than half of the days in a given month, miss about 25 workdays per year and need twice the average number of outpatient visits per year, indicating a significant impact on daily function and work productivity. Some of these symptoms, like fatigue and pain, have not been well studied in Cushing’s patients, and need more attention.”

Geer and colleagues administered a cross-sectional survey to 55 adults aged 21 years and older who had been diagnosed with Cushing’s syndrome at least 6 months before the survey and were receiving at least one pharmacologic therapy for their disease (85% women; mean age, 43.4 years). The survey was conducted online from June to August 2021. Five patient-reported outcome scales were included. The CushingQoL was used to analyze quality of life, a visual analog scale was included to assess pain, the Brief Fatigue Inventory was used to measure fatigue, the Sleep Disturbance v1.0 scale assessed perceptions of sleep and the PROMIS Short Form Anxiety v1.0-8a scale was used to measure fear, anxious misery, hyperarousal and somatic symptoms related to arousal. Participants self-reported the impact of Cushing’s syndrome on daily life and their physician’s level of awareness of Cushing’s syndrome.

Some symptoms decline in severity over time

Of the study group, 81% had pituitary or adrenal tumors, and 20% had ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone-producing tumors; 80% of participants underwent surgery to treat their Cushing’s syndrome.

The frequency of reported symptoms did not change from Cushing’s syndrome diagnosis to the time of the survey. The most frequently reported symptoms were weight gain, muscle fatigue and weakness and anxiety.

Participants reported a decline in symptom severity for weight gain, muscle fatigue and weakness and menstrual changes from diagnosis to the survey. Though symptom severity declined, none of the three symptoms were entirely eliminated. Adults did not report declines in severity for other symptoms. Hirsutism and anxiety were reported by few participants, but were consistently scored high in severity among those who reported it. There were no changes in patient satisfaction with medications from their first appointment to the time of the survey.

“It was surprising that anxiety and pain did not improve with treatment,” Geer said. “A quarter of patients at baseline reported anxiety and this percentage was exactly the same after treatment. Same for pain — nearly a quarter of patients reported pain despite treatment. While the presence of anxiety has been well-documented in Cushing’s patients, pain has not, and needs further study.”

Nearly half of primary care providers unable to diagnose Cushing’s syndrome

All participants reported having at least one challenge with being diagnosed with Cushing’s syndrome. Of the respondents, 49% said their primary care provider was unable to diagnose their Cushing’s syndrome and 33% initially received the wrong diagnosis. Physicians referred 49% of participants to a specialist, and 39% of adults said their doctor lacked knowledge or understanding of their condition.

The study group had a moderate level of quality of life impairment as assessed through the CushingQoL scale. The mean pain score was 3.6 of a possible 10, indicating low levels of pain. Moderate to severe levels of fatigue were reported by 69% of participants. Self-reported sleep and anxiety scores were similar to what is observed in the general population.

Participants said sexual activity, self-confidence and life satisfaction were most impacted by a Cushing’s syndrome diagnosis. Adults experienced symptoms a mean 16 days in a typical month and saw their outpatient physician an average of six times per year. Those who were employed said they miss 2 days of work per month, or about 25 days per year, due to Cushing’s syndrome.

“Longitudinal assessment of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes based on validated measures and coupled with biochemical and treatment data is needed in a large cohort of Cushing’s patients,” Geer said. “This will allow us to identify clinically meaningful changes in symptom burden within each patient, as well as predictors of outcomes — which patients improve on which symptoms, and which patients do not feel better despite biochemical normalization. We need to improve our ability to help our patients feel better, not just achieve normal cortisol levels.”

For more information:

Eliza B. Geer, MD, can be reached at geere@mskcc.org.

From https://www.healio.com/news/endocrinology/20230830/adults-with-cushings-syndrome-report-high-burden-of-illness-despite-ongoing-treatment

Filed under: Cushing's, symptoms, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Cushing’s Disease Associated With Partially Empty Sella Turcica Syndrome

Posted on June 28, 2023 by MaryO

Abstract

The association between empty sella turcica (EST) syndrome and Cushing’s disease has been rarely reported. It is plausible to hypothesize that EST syndrome in association with Cushing’s disease can be attributed to intracranial hypertension. In this case report, we present a 47-year-old male patient who presented with weight loss, fatigue, easy bruising, acanthosis nigricans, and skin creases hyperpigmentation. Investigations revealed hypokalemia and confirmed the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain showed a partial EST syndrome and a new pituitary nodule as compared with previous brain imaging. Transsphenoidal surgery was pursued and was complicated by cerebrospinal fluid leakage. This case reflects the rare association of EST syndrome and Cushing’s disease, suggesting the increased risk of postoperative complications in this setting and the diagnostic challenge that EST syndrome imposes. We review the literature for a possible mechanism of this association.

Introduction

Cushing’s disease is commonly caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-producing pituitary adenoma, which can be very challenging to be seen on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1]. Empty sella turcica (EST) syndrome is a radiological diagnosis of apparently empty turcica secondary to outpouching of the arachnoid mater into the turcica, which can be attributed to intracranial hypertension (ICHTN). This can make the visual diagnosis of pituitary adenoma even more challenging in clinical practice. ICHTN has been also associated with Cushing’s disease and might explain this infrequent association between EST and Cushing’s disease [1]. EST syndrome can be either partial or complete, primary or secondary and has been seen infrequently with Cushing’s disease. In this setting, not only that it is likely to obscure an underlying pituitary lesion, but also it does contribute to the risk of postoperative complications [2].

Case Presentation

A 47-year-old male presented to the emergency department (ED) with slowly progressive generalized limb muscle weakness affecting both distal and proximal muscles over a few weeks and gait instability for three days prior to presentation. He also reported unintentional 40 pounds weight loss over the previous four months. Past medical history was significant for type II diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. In the ED, vital signs included a blood pressure of 140/90 mmHg, a heart rate of 66 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 16 cycles per minute, and SpO2 of 97% on room air. Body mass index has decreased to 22 kg/m2 from a baseline of 26 kg/m2 one month prior. On the physical exam, he exhibited cachexia, easy bruising, acanthosis nigricans, and hyperpigmentation of skin creases. All other systems were negative. Complete metabolic panel and complete blood count were obtained showing hyperglycemia of 311 mg/dl, see Table 1. Further lab evaluation showed elevated salivary cortisol at 2.96 microgram/dl (reference range 0.094-1.551 mcg/dl), elevated 24-hour urinary free cortisol at 156 mcg/24 hour (reference 10-100 mcg/24h), positive overnight dexamethasone suppression test with serum cortisol at 2.8 mcg/dl (reference more than 2 mcg/dl), negative anti-adrenal antibodies, normal aldosterone, and elevated dehydroepiandrostenedione at 401 mcg/dl (reference 32-240 mcg/dl), with lack of suppression of the ACTH level at 35.1 pg/ml (reference 10-60 pg/ml). This confirmed the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease.

Variable Finding Reference
Random glucose 311 Less than 200 mg/dl
Sodium 141 137-145 mmol/L
Potassium 2.5 3.5-5.1 mmol/L
Chloride 96 98-107 mmol/L
Bicarbonate 32 22-30 mmol/L
Blood urea nitrogen 32 9-20 mg/dl
Creatinine 0.52 0.66-1.25 mg/dl
Calcium 8.7 8.6-10.3 mg/dl
Total protein 5.5 6.5-8.5 g/dl
Albumin 3.3 3.5-5 g/dl
Total bilirubin 0.6 0.2-1.3 mg/dl
Alkaline phosphatase 115 38-126 U/L
Aspartate transaminase 17 17-59 U/L
Alanine transaminase 39 Less than 49 U/L
White blood cell count 10×10^3 cells/mcl 4-10×1063 cells/mcl
Hemoglobin 15.3 13.7-17.5 g/dl
Platelet 281 150-400×10^3 cells/mcl
Table 1: Lab Findings

Computed tomography (CT) scan of the head was unremarkable. CT scan of the chest was also unremarkable. CT scan of abdomen and pelvis showed no adrenal mass. Ultrasound of the kidneys was unremarkable. Pituitary MRI brain protocol for adenoma showed a partial EST, shortening within neurohypophysis and a new 10 x 8 x 4 mm nodule along the floor of pituitary sella as compared to MRI four years ago (Figure 1).

Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging-(MRI)-Brain
Figure 1: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain

MRI brain showing partially empty sella turcica syndrome ( black arrow) with a small nodule at the floor of the turcica (white arrow).

The diagnosis of Cushing’s disease was confirmed, and the patient underwent trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma. Histological examination showed positive CAM 5.2, positive chromogranin, and ACTH immunostains. The patient presented to the ED five days after discharge home. He stated that he noticed drainage from the nose that transitioned from bloody to clear fluid and has been increasing in quantity for two days with associated intermittent headaches since the surgery. He was afebrile with stable vital signs. No signs of infection were noted on basic labs. These were significant only for mild asymptomatic hyponatremia of 131 mmol/L and hypokalemia of 3.3 mmol/L. The patient was diagnosed with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and had a lumbar drain trial. The trial was unsuccessful after several days, and the patient underwent a transnasal endoscopic repair of CSF rhinorrhea using nasoseptal flaps. At an outpatient follow-up one month and three months after the surgery, prior lab abnormalities including hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and hyperglycemia resolved. No further evidence of CSF leakage was appreciated, and he remained asymptomatic.

Discussion

EST syndrome is characterized by herniation of the subarachnoid space into the intrasellar space with compression of the pituitary gland into the posteroinferior wall [3]. This is likely to obscure the presence of underlying pituitary mass. The incidence of EST syndrome in the general population is estimated at 20%. The association between EST syndrome and Cushing’s disease has been reported infrequently. A retrospective study of 68 patients with Cushing’s disease found that 16% of these have EST syndrome [3].

Cushing’s disease usually results from pituitary adenomas secreting ACTH, and even the smallest microadenomas can produce a systemic disease. These microadenomas can be very difficult to recognize on brain MRI [4]. This is complicated in EST syndrome and even further with the possibility of ectopic ACTH production. A retrospective study of 197 patients diagnosed with Cushing’s disease concluded that EST syndrome is associated with higher prevalence of MRI-negative Cushing’s disease. This was attributed to ICHTN and pituitary gland compression [1]. Although surgery is curative in 70-90% of cases, EST syndrome was found to have higher risk of postoperative complications among those with Cushing’s disease including diabetes insipidus, hypopituitarism, and CSF leakage [3]. This is usually because in the case of MRI-negative Cushing’s disease with total EST syndrome, empiric surgical exploration is sought after inferior petrosal sampling confirms the pituitary origin of excess ACTH, and postoperative remission indicates adequate tumor resection [2]. This entails a higher chance of uncertainty and injury to healthy pituitary tissue.

EST syndrome can be either primarily due to defects in the sellar diaphragm or anatomical variant or secondary to ICHTN. EST syndrome has been reported in association with many conditions associated with elevated intracranial pressure including tumors, thrombosis, meningitis, hydrocephalus, and Arnold-Chiari malformation [5]. Reversal of EST syndrome has been reported in those with idiopathic ICHTN with therapy by acetazolamide, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and lumbar puncture [6,7]. A study has shown correlation between CSF circulation impairment or blockage and EST syndrome [8]. The incidence of EST syndrome in association with symptomatic intracranial hypertension is variable and ranges from 2.5% for total EST syndrome to 94% for partial EST syndrome [9]. Impaired CSF circulation and dynamics have been reported in 77% of patients with EST syndrome [10]. In addition to intracranial hypertension, EST syndrome has also been described in association with obesity, meningioma, pediatric nevoid basal cell carcinoma, therapy for growth hormone deficiency and even in healthy individuals [9]. Lack of symptoms of intracranial hypertension in this patient does not rule it out as intracranial hypertension in EST syndrome represents a spectrum that ranges from asymptomatic, milder intracranial hypertension to symptomatic intracranial hypertension with headache, visual disturbance, and papilledema [10]. This explains the fact that only 8-14% of EST syndrome progress to symptomatic ICHTN, while symptomatic ICHTN has been associated with EST syndrome in 94% of cases.

ICHTN has been seen in association with disturbance of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. This has been reported after surgical and medical treatment of Cushing’s disease, withdrawal of long-term steroid therapy, initial presentation of Addison’s disease, or relative glucocorticoids deficiency [11]. Cortisol excess increases CSF production and reduces its absorption, hence increasing intracranial pressure [12]. Another possible mechanism is the expression of both mineralocorticoid responsive epithelial sodium channel receptors on the basolateral membrane of the CSF producing epithelial cells of the choroid plexus as well as the expression of 11-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 enzyme, which is a bidirectional enzyme that mainly functions to convert the inactive cortisone to active cortisol. These mechanisms play a role in maintaining the balance between CSF production and absorption [13,14].

In this case, the patient presented some clinical findings that are rarely associated with Cushing’s disease, combined with a radiological feature that masked the true diagnosis. Our patient presented with significant weight loss, rather than central obesity, which is normally associated with Cushing’s disease. Although possible, the increase in ACTH due to Cushing’s disease is not sufficient to cause hyperpigmentation, which is a classical finding of Addison’s disease, where the entire adrenal cortex is usually affected due to an autoimmune destruction; however, the zona glomerulosa of the adrenal cortex produces aldosterone and its deficiency would lead to hyperkalemia [15]. Our patient presented with both hyperpigmentation and hypokalemia.

Conclusions

EST syndrome is an uncommon radiological finding of apparently EST that has been reported in association with ICHTN. The latter has also been seen in association with Cushing’s disease/syndrome. This is likely to result from glucocorticoid excess-induced change in CSF flow dynamics. EST has been infrequently described in association with Cushing’s disease. This association has a clinical implication as it is likely to obscure the visualization of pituitary lesions responsible for Cushing’s disease, contribute to diagnostic uncertainty, and increase the risk of healthy pituitary tissue injury and the risk of postoperative complications including CSF leakage.

References

  1. Himes BT, Bhargav AG, Brown DA, Kaufmann TJ, Bancos I, Van Gompel JJ: Does pituitary compression/empty sella syndrome contribute to MRI-negative Cushing’s disease? A single-institution experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2020, 48:E3. 10.3171/2020.3.FOCUS2084
  2. Sun Y, Sun Q, Fan C, et al.: Diagnosis and therapy for Cushing’s disease with negative dynamic MRI finding: a single-centre experience. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012, 76:868-76. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04279.x
  3. Manavela MP, Goodall CM, Katz SB, Moncet D, Bruno OD: The association of Cushing’s disease and primary empty sella turcica. Pituitary. 2001, 4:145-51. 10.1023/a:1015310806063
  4. Chatain GP, Patronas N, Smirniotopoulos JG, et al.: Potential utility of FLAIR in MRI-negative Cushing’s disease. J Neurosurg. 2018, 129:620-8. 10.3171/2017.4.JNS17234
  5. Friedman DI, Jacobson DM: Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. 2002, 59:1492-5. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000029570.69134.1b
  6. Triggiani V, Giagulli VA, Moschetta M, Guastamacchia E: An unusual case of reversible empty sella. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2016, 16:154-6. 10.2174/1871530315666151001141507
  7. Wind JJ, Lonser RR, Nieman LK, DeVroom HL, Chang R, Oldfield EH: The lateralization accuracy of inferior petrosal sinus sampling in 501 patients with Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013, 98:2285-93. 10.1210/jc.2012-3943
  8. Brismar K, Bergstrand G: CSF circulation in subjects with the empty sella syndrome. Neuroradiology. 1981, 21:167-75. 10.1007/BF00367338
  9. Ranganathan S, Lee SH, Checkver A, Sklar E, Lam BL, Danton GH, Alperin N: Magnetic resonance imaging finding of empty sella in obesity related idiopathic intracranial hypertension is associated with enlarged sella turcica. Neuroradiology. 2013, 55:955-61. 10.1007/s00234-013-1207-0
  10. Maira G, Anile C, Mangiola A: Primary empty sella syndrome in a series of 142 patients. J Neurosurg. 2005, 103:831-6. 10.3171/jns.2005.103.5.0831
  11. Zada G, Tirosh A, Kaiser UB, Laws ER, Woodmansee WW: Cushing’s disease and idiopathic intracranial hypertension: case report and review of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95:4850-4. 10.1210/jc.2010-0896
  12. Sinclair AJ, Ball AK, Burdon MA, Clarke CE, Stewart PM, Curnow SJ, Rauz S: Exploring the pathogenesis of IIH: an inflammatory perspective. J Neuroimmunol. 2008, 201:212-20. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.06.029
  13. Sinclair AJ, Onyimba CU, Khosla P, et al.: Corticosteroids, 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isozymes and the rabbit choroid plexus. J Neuroendocrinol. 2007, 19:614-20. 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2007.01569.x
  14. Amin MS, Wang HW, Reza E, Whitman SC, Tuana BS, Leenen FH: Distribution of epithelial sodium channels and mineralocorticoid receptors in cardiovascular regulatory centers in rat brain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005, 289:R1787-97. 10.1152/ajpregu.00063.2005
  15. Stratakis CA: Skin manifestations of Cushing’s syndrome. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016, 17:283-6. 10.1007/s11154-016-9399-3

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/161111-cushings-disease-associated-with-partially-empty-sella-turcica-syndrome-a-case-report#!/

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Rare Diseases, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »