Desmopressin is Promising Alternative in Diagnosing Cushing’s Disease

Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) — a procedure that uses desmopressin to determine levels of ACTH hormone from veins that drain from the pituitary gland, is a sensitive way to diagnose patients with Cushing’s disease and find tumors, a Chinese study shows.

The study, “Tumour Lateralization in Cushing’s disease by Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling with desmopressin,” appeared in the journal Clinical Endocrinology.

Cushing’s disease is characterized by excessive production of the adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) caused by a tumor in the pituitary gland. ACTH is the hormone that causes the adrenal glands to produce cortisol.

Currently, pituitary imaging is insufficient to confirm a Cushing’s diagnosis. This is because 70 percent of pituitary adenomas in Cushing’s are microadenomas, which are physically very small. As a result, 40 percent of Cushing’s patients are reported as being healthy.

This means that a Cushing’s diagnosis requires a combination of techniques including clinical symptoms, imaging methods and endocrinological assays that include measures of serum cortisol and ACTH levels.

IPSS determines ACTH levels from veins that drain from the pituitary gland. ACTH levels are then compared to ACTH levels in blood. Higher levels in the pituitary gland indicate a pituitary tumor.

IPSS can also be used to determine tumor lateralization, which refers to which side of the pituitary gland the tumor is located on. The test is 69 percent accurate.

Doctors administer IPSS along with corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation. IPSS with CRH is considered the gold standard for preoperative diagnosis of Cushing’s, with a diagnostic sensitivity (or true positive rate) of 95 percent and specificity (or true negative rate) of 90 to 95 percent. Unfortunately, the high cost and limited availability of CRH make it impractical for many patients.

Desmopressin has been used to replace CRH to stimulate ACTH secretion for IPSS, and prior studies have shown that desmopressin’s sensitivity is comparable to that of CRH.

Researchers at Peking Union Medical College in Beijing conducted a retrospective analysis of their experience using desmopressin-stimulated IPSS to determine its diagnostic value for Cushing’s and its predictive value for tumor lateralization.

Researchers analyzed 91 Cushing’s patients who either had negative findings on the MRI imaging of the pituitary or negative high-dose dexamethasone suppression tests, which is another method of evaluation. All patients underwent IPSS with desmopressin, followed by pituitary surgery to extract the tumor.

Of the 91 patients tested, 90 patients had confirmed Cushing’s. And of these, 89 had positive IPSS findings, which led to a sensitivity of 98.9 percent for this test. One patient out of 91 who did not have Cushing’s also underwent this test, which led to a negative IPSS result and a specificity of 100 percent.

Researchers also determined tumor lateralization in patients who were ultimately diagnosed with Cushing’s and underwent surgery. Results of the IPSS showed a 72.5 percent concordance between the results from the IPSS and the surgery.

Therefore, IPSS with desmopressin is a comparable approach to IPSS with CRH for the diagnosis of Cushing’s. It also demonstrates moderate accuracy in determining the location of tumors.

“Like many medical centers in China, we currently have no supply of CRH, while desmopressin is readily available,” researchers concluded. “Moreover, desmopressin is cheaper than CRH. As our data and other studies indicate, IPSS with desmopressin yielded comparable outcomes to IPSS with CRH. Therefore, desmopressin-stimulated IPSS might serve as a possible alternative to CRH-stimulated IPSS.”

From https://cushingsdiseasenews.com/2017/11/14/ipss-desmopressin-alternative-method-diagnosis-cushings-disease/

New ACTH Detection Method Improves Cure Rates in Cushing’s Disease Patients

Researchers have identified a new, quick method for detecting ACTH-producing tumors – called Elecsys – that can improve the cure rates of Cushing’s disease patients undergoing surgery.

The study, “Long-term outcomes of tissue-based ACTH-antibody assay–guided transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas in Cushing disease,” was published in the Journal of Neurosurgery.

Transsphenoidal resection (TSR) – a surgical procedure performed through the nose and sphenoid sinus to remove a pituitary tumor – has been the method of choice for treatment for Cushing’s disease.

However, it often fails to localize the tumor with precision, leading to an incomplete resection (removal). This is likely a result of the preoperative methods used to guide surgeons before surgery, which include both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a minimally invasive procedure called bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) that measures ACTH in the veins that drain the pituitary gland.

However, both “suffer from suboptimal sensitivity and thus allow for incomplete resections, specially if pathological frozen sections fail to identify tumor,” researchers wrote.

MRI, for example, detects only 50 percent of Cushing’s adenomas, limiting surgeons’ ability to conduct curative TSR surgeries. Therefore, better diagnostic and tumor localization techniques are needed to increase the likelihood that initial surgeries can remove the entire tumor and cure patients.

A team of researchers at Yale School of Medicine evaluated a new method for guiding tumor localization during TSR. The method – a double-antibody sandwich assay for ACTH – is performed in the operating room in resected pituitary samples from patients. ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) is a hormone produced in the pituitary gland in the brain, that simulated cortisol production in the adrenal glands. In patients with Cushing disease the pituitary gland releases too much ACTH.

In the new method – called Elecsys – samples are squeezed between sandwich-like system composed of two antibodies that recognize two sections of the ACTH protein. The three-step procedure is quick, allowing doctors to analyze samples in the operating room and determine if they have removed the entire tumors.

The performance and outcomes associated with the Elecsys were assessed by reviewing data of tissue samples from 14 patients with ACTH-secreting adenomas, who underwent TSR surgeries between 2009 and 2014.

“The intraoperative TSR protocol was modified with the introduction of the ACTH assay such that if either the assay or the frozen-section pathology returned results positive for tumor, that area of the gland was resected,” the researchers explained.

The new ACTH method detected tumor tissue and was capable of distinguishing it from normal tissue with a 95% sensitivity and 71.3% specificity. These values are comparable to those using the standard method for tumor localization, which requires frozen sections of the tumor. This suggests that the test can be used either in conjunction with or in place of frozen sections.

Also, 85.7% of the patients achieved long-term disease remission, with the remission rate exceeding the rate with previous methods (71.9%).

Overall, “these preliminary findings reflect the promising potential of tissue-based ACTH-antibody-guided assay for improving the cure rates of Cushing’s disease patients undergoing TSR. Further studies with larger sample sizes, further refinements of assay interpretation, and longer-term follow-ups are needed,” the study concluded.

From https://cushingsdiseasenews.com/2017/10/19/acth-detection-method-improved-cure-rates-cushings-disease-study-shows/

Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Cushing’s Syndrome

D. Lynn Loriaux, M.D., Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 2017; 376:1451-1459April 13, 2017DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1505550

More than a century ago, Harvey Cushing introduced the term “pluriglandular syndrome” to describe a disorder characterized by rapid development of central obesity, arterial hypertension, proximal muscle weakness, diabetes mellitus, oligomenorrhea, hirsutism, thin skin, and ecchymoses.1 Cushing knew that this syndrome was associated with adrenal cancer,2 and he suspected that some cases might have a pituitary component.

On September 6, 1911, he performed a craniotomy on one of his patients (referred to as Case XLV) but found no pituitary tumor.3 In his description of the case, he goes on to say that “we may perchance be on the way toward the recognition of the consequences of hyperadrenalism.”2 With time, it became clear that the disorder could be caused by small basophilic adenomas of the pituitary gland,4 and the pluriglandular syndrome became known as Cushing’s syndrome.

Fuller Albright provided the next conceptual advance in an extraordinary report, published in the first volume of the Laurentian Hormone Conference, “The Effects of Hormones on Osteogenesis in Man”5:

It has been our concept that protoplasm in general, like the protoplasmic matrix of bone, is constantly being anabolized and catabolized at one and the same time; a factor which increases catabolism would lead to very much the same net result as a factor which inhibits anabolism, but there would be some differences; it is my belief that the “S” hormone [cortisol] is anti-anabolic rather than catabolic. . . . The anti-anabolism . . . is contrasted with the increased anabolism due to an excess of the “N” hormone [testosterone] in the adreno-genital syndrome. This anti-anabolism of protoplasm in Cushing’s syndrome accounts for not only the osteoporosis, but the muscular weakness, the thin skin, probably the easy bruisability, and possibly the atrophy of the lymphoid tissues and thymus.

Nonetheless, in the intervening years, the physical examination of patients suspected to have glucocorticoid excess focused on the anabolic changes, essentially to the exclusion of the antianabolic changes. With the rapid increase in the rate of obesity in the general population, Cushing’s syndrome can no longer be reliably separated from the metabolic syndrome of simple obesity on the basis of anabolic signs alone. However, the antianabolic changes in Cushing’s syndrome are very effective in making this distinction. This review focuses on the problems introduced into the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome by the obesity epidemic and on ways to alter the traditional approach, using the antianabolic changes of excess cortisol to separate patients with Cushing’s syndrome from obese patients with the insulin-resistant metabolic syndrome.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564) published his transformational work on human anatomy, De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem, in 1543. It is the book that corrected many of Galen’s anatomical errors. The book was met with considerable hostility. As an example, Jacobus Sylvius (Jacques Dubois, 1478–1555), the world’s leading anatomist at the time and Vesalius’s former mentor, on being asked his opinion of the work, replied, “Galen is not wrong. It is man that has changed, and not for the better.”6 This was not true then, but it is true now.

Approximately one third of the U.S. population is obese. The worldwide prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among obese persons is conservatively estimated at 10%; that is, approximately 12 million people have the obesity-related metabolic syndrome.7,8 The clinical picture of this syndrome is almost the same as that of Cushing’s syndrome.9,10 The prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome is about 75 cases per 1 million population, or 24,000 affected persons. On the basis of these prevalence estimates, the chance that a person with obesity, hypertension, hirsutism, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia has Cushing’s syndrome is about 1 in 500. In Harvey Cushing’s era, when obesity was rare, making the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome was the most certain aspect of the management of this disorder. Today, making the diagnosis is the least certain aspect in the care of patients with Cushing’s syndrome.

The metabolic syndrome caused by glucocorticoid hypersecretion can be differentiated from the obesity-associated metabolic syndrome with the use of a careful assessment of Albright’s antianabolic effects of cortisol. These effects — osteopenia, thin skin, and ecchymoses — are present in patients with Cushing’s syndrome but not in patients with simple obesity.

Patients in whom osteoporosis is diagnosed radiographically are more likely to have Cushing’s syndrome than those who do not have osteoporosis, with a positive likelihood ratio of 11.11-13 Today, a z score of −2 at the lumbar spine supports this criterion. Skinfold thickness is conveniently measured with an electrocardiographic caliper that has the points dulled with a sharpening stone and the screws tightened so that the gap is maintained when the caliper is removed from the skinfold. The skin over the proximal phalanx of the middle finger of the nondominant hand is commonly used for this measurement

 

(Figure 1 FIGURE 1Measurement of Skinfold Thickness.). A thickness of less than 2 mm is considered to be thin skin. Patients who have thin skin are more likely to have Cushing’s syndrome, with a positive likelihood ratio of 116

 

(Figure 2 FIGURE 2 Comparison of Skinfold Thickness in Patients with Cushing’s Syndrome and Those with Other Conditions Related to Insulin Resistance.).13-15 Finally, patients who have three or more ecchymoses that are larger than 1 cm in diameter and not associated with trauma such as venipuncture are more likely to have Cushing’s syndrome than are patients without such findings, with a positive likelihood ratio of 4.13,16

If we know the prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome in the population of persons with the obesity-related metabolic syndrome, we can begin to calculate the probability that a person has Cushing’s syndrome, using the likelihood ratios for the antianabolic features observed on physical examination. Likelihood ratios can be converted into probabilities with the use of Bayes’ theorem. This conversion is markedly facilitated by the Fagan nomogram for this purpose.17

The prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome is not known, but it can be estimated. Two persons per 1 million population die from adrenal cancer every year.18 The current life span for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma, after diagnosis, is between 2 and 4 years.19,20 Allowing 3 years to make the diagnosis, the prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome is 6 cases per million. In most case series of Cushing’s syndrome, an average of 8% of patients have adrenal carcinoma.21 If 6 per million is 8% of the group, the total Cushing’s syndrome group is 75 persons per million, or 24,000 persons. If all 24,000 patients are included in the metabolic syndrome group, comprising 12 million people, the prevalence of Cushing’s syndrome is 0.002, or 0.2%. With a probability of 0.2% and a likelihood ratio of 116 for thin skin, 18 for osteopenia, and 4 for ecchymoses, the probability that a patient with these three findings has Cushing’s syndrome is 95%.

URINARY FREE CORTISOL

The diagnosis of all endocrine diseases requires a clinical presentation that is compatible with the disease, as well as identification of the pathophysiological cause. An assessment for excess glucocorticoid effects can be made by measuring the 24-hour urinary free cortisol level.22 There are two kinds of free cortisol: plasma protein-unbound cortisol and cortisol unconjugated to sulfuric or hyaluronic acid. Protein-unbound cortisol is filtered in the glomerulus and then reabsorbed in the collecting system. About 3% of filtered cortisol ends up in the urine. This free cortisol in the urine is unconjugated. Thus, the urinary free cortisol level is a direct reflection of the free, bioactive cortisol level in plasma. The free cortisol level is quantified in a 24-hour urine sample by averaging the increased secretion of cortisol in the morning and the decreased secretion in the afternoon and at night. Urinary creatinine is also measured to determine whether the collection is complete. Creatinine levels of less than 1.5 g per day for men and less than 1 g per day for women indicate incomplete collection, and the test should be repeated in patients with these levels.

Unconjugated cortisol can be extracted directly from urine with a nonpolar lipid solvent. After extraction, the cortisol is purified by means of high-pressure liquid chromatography and then quantified with a binding assay, usually radioimmunoassay. Free cortisol also can be quantitated directly by means of mass spectroscopy. The urinary free cortisol assay of choice uses high-pressure liquid chromatographic separation followed by mass spectrometric quantitation.23 With the use of this assay, the urinary free cortisol level in healthy adults ranges from 8 to 51 μg per 24 hours (mean [±SD], 23±8). Clinical depression increases urinary free cortisol excretion, and most studies show that the level of urinary free cortisol ranges from 10 to 60 μg per day in patients with typical clinical signs and symptoms of depression. If we use 60 μg per day as the cutoff between normal values (<60 μg per day) and elevated values (≥60 μg per day), urinary free cortisol excretion of 62 μg per day or more has a positive likelihood ratio of 11.24 Thus, in a patient presenting with obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and hirsutism who has thin skin, osteopenia, ecchymoses, and an elevated urinary free cortisol level, the probability of Cushing’s syndrome is 1 (100%). For such patients, the clinician should move directly to a differential diagnostic evaluation.

DEXAMETHASONE-SUPPRESSION TEST

The dexamethasone-suppression test is commonly used in the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. This test was developed by Grant Liddle in the early 1960s as a differential diagnostic test to separate corticotropin-dependent from corticotropin-independent Cushing’s syndrome. This is now done by measuring the plasma corticotropin level. Unfortunately, dexamethasone suppression has continued to be used as a screening test for Cushing’s syndrome.

The control group for this test comprises patients with obesity and depression in whom cortisol secretion is not suppressed in response to an oral dose of 1 mg of dexamethasone at midnight. Of the current U.S. population of 360 million people, approximately one third (120 million people) are obese. Of those who are obese, 10% (12 million people) have depression. In half these patients (6 million people), the plasma cortisol level will not be suppressed in response to a dexamethasone challenge. On the basis of my estimate of the current prevalence of undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome (24,000 cases) and the estimate of the at-risk population (6 million persons), the positive predictive value of the dexamethasone-suppression test is only 0.4%. Thus, this test should not influence what the physician does next and should no longer be used for this purpose.

OUTLIERS

For patients with convincing evidence of Cushing’s syndrome on physical examination and an elevated 24-hour urinary free cortisol level, the differential diagnostic process outlined below should be initiated. However, a small group of patients will not meet these criteria.

Some patients have a strongly positive physical examination but low or zero urinary free cortisol excretion. Plasma corticotropin levels are suppressed in these patients. These patients are receiving exogenous glucocorticoids. The glucocorticoid must be identified, and a plan must be made for its discontinuation. Sometimes the glucocorticoid is being given by proxy (e.g., by a parent to a child), and no history of glucocorticoid administration can be found. Nevertheless, the glucocorticoid must be identified and discontinued.

Other patients have few or no clinical signs of Cushing’s syndrome but do have elevated urinary free cortisol excretion. Plasma corticotropin is measurable in these patients. They are usually identified during an evaluation for arterial hypertension. All such patients should undergo inferior petrosal sinus sampling to determine the source of corticotropin secretion. Ectopic sources are almost always neoplastic and are usually in the chest.25 Patients with eutopic secretion usually have the syndrome of generalized glucocorticoid resistance.26

Finally, a few patients have convincing findings on physical examination coupled with a normal urinary free cortisol level. In such cases, the clinician should make sure that urinary free cortisol is being measured with high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, that renal function is normal, and that the collections are complete. “Periodic” Cushing’s syndrome must be ruled out by measuring urinary free cortisol frequently over the course of a month.27 If these efforts fail, the patient should be followed for a year, with urinary free cortisol measurements performed frequently. No additional tests should be performed until the situation is sorted out. More tests would be likely to lead to an unnecessary surgical procedure.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

The differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is shown in Figure 3

FIGURE 3Differential Diagnosis of Cushing’s Syndrome.. If plasma corticotropin is measurable, the disease process is corticotropin-dependent. If corticotropin is not measurable, the process is corticotropin-independent.

Corticotropin-dependent causes of Cushing’s syndrome are divided into those in which the corticotropin comes from the pituitary (eutopic causes) and those in which the corticotropin comes from elsewhere (ectopic causes). This differentiation is made with the measurement of corticotropin in inferior petrosal sinus plasma and the simultaneous measurement of corticotropin in peripheral (antecubital) plasma immediately after corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation of pituitary corticotropin secretion. In samples obtained 4, 6, and 15 minutes after stimulation with corticotropin-releasing hormone, eutopic corticotropin secretion is associated with a ratio of the central-plasma corticotropin level to the peripheral-plasma corticotropin level of 3 or more. Ectopic corticotropin secretion is associated with a central-to-peripheral corticotropin ratio of less than 3. The positive predictive value of this test is 1 (Figure 4

FIGURE 4Maximal Ratio of Corticotropin in Inferior Petrosal Sinus Plasma to Corticotropin in Peripheral Plasma in Patients with Cushing’s Syndrome, Ectopic Corticotropin Secretion, or Adrenal Disease.).28

Although some authorities suggest that inferior petrosal sinus sampling can safely be bypassed in patients with corticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome and a well-defined pituitary adenoma, I disagree. The incidence of nonfunctioning pituitary microadenomas is between 15% and 40%.29 This means that up to 40% of patients with ectopic secretion of corticotropin have an incidental pituitary abnormality. If it is assumed that the pituitary abnormality is responsible for corticotropin secretion, 15 to 40% of patients with ectopic secretion of corticotropin will be misdiagnosed and submitted to a transsphenoidal exploration of the sella turcica and pituitary gland. The prevalence of ectopic corticotropin secretion in the population of patients with undiagnosed Cushing’s syndrome is about 10%, accounting for 2400 patients. Up to 40% of these patients, or 960, have an incidental pituitary tumor. The mortality associated with transsphenoidal microadenomectomy is 1%.30 If all 360 to 960 patients undergo this procedure, there will be up to 10 deaths from an operation that can have no benefit. For this reason alone, all patients with corticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome should undergo inferior petrosal sinus sampling to confirm the source of corticotropin secretion before any surgical intervention is contemplated.

Patients with eutopic corticotropin secretion are almost certain to have a corticotropin-secreting pituitary microadenoma. An occasional patient will have alcohol-induced pseudo–Cushing’s syndrome. The slightest suggestion of alcoholism should lead to a 3-week abstinence period before any surgery is considered.31

Patients with ectopic corticotropin secretion are first evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the chest. In two thirds of these patients, a tumor will be found.25 If nothing is found in the chest, MRI of the abdominal and pelvic organs is performed. If these additional imaging studies are also negative, there are two options: bilateral adrenalectomy or blockade of cortisol synthesis. If blockade is chosen, the patient should undergo repeat scanning at 6-month intervals.32 If no source is found by the end of the second year, it is unlikely that the source will ever be found, and bilateral adrenalectomy should be performed for definitive treatment (Doppman JL: personal communication).

Corticotropin-independent Cushing’s syndrome is usually caused by an adrenal neoplasm. Benign tumors tend to be small (<5 cm in diameter) and secrete a single hormone, cortisol. The contralateral adrenal gland is suppressed by the cortisol secreted from the tumorous gland. If the value for Hounsfield units is less than 10 and the washout of contrast material is greater than 60% at 15 minutes, the tumor is almost certainly benign.33 Such tumors can be treated successfully with laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

The syndromes of micronodular and macronodular adrenal dysplasia usually affect both adrenal glands. The nodules secrete cortisol. Corticotropin is suppressed, as is the internodular tissue of the adrenal glands. Percutaneous bilateral adrenalectomy, followed by glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid treatment, is curative.

Adrenal tumors secreting more than one hormone (i.e., cortisol and androgen or estrogen) are almost always malignant. Surgical removal of all detectable disease is indicated, as is a careful search for metastases. If metastases are found, they should be removed. This usually requires an open adrenalectomy. It goes without saying that adrenal tumors, nodules, and metastases should be treated by the most experienced endocrine cancer surgeon available.

If the plasma cortisol level on the morning after a transsphenoidal microadenomectomy is 0, the operation was a success. The patient should be treated with oral hydrocortisone, at a dose of 12 mg per square meter of body-surface area once a day in the morning, and a tetracosactide (Cortrosyn) stimulation test should be performed at 3-month intervals. When the tetracosactide-stimulated plasma cortisol level is higher than 20 μg per deciliter (551 μmol per liter), cortisol administration can be stopped. The same rule applies in the case of a unilateral adrenalectomy. If the adrenalectomy is bilateral, cortisol, at a dose of 12 to 15 mg per square meter per day, and fludrocortisone (Florinef), at a dose of 100 μg per day, should be prescribed as lifelong therapy.

SUMMARY

The obesity epidemic has led to necessary changes in the evaluation and treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome. The most dramatic change is the emphasis on the antianabolic alterations in Cushing’s syndrome, which can provide a strong basis for separating patients with Cushing’s syndrome from the more numerous patients with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. More can be done along these lines. Likelihood ratios are known for proximal muscle weakness and can be known for brain atrophy and growth failure in children.

The dexamethasone-suppression test, although still very popular, no longer has a role in the evaluation and treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Only three biochemical tests are needed: urinary free cortisol, plasma corticotropin, and plasma cortisol measurements. Urinary free cortisol excretion is the test that confirms the clinical diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. To be trustworthy, it must be performed in the most stringent way, with the use of high-pressure liquid chromatography followed by mass spectrometric quantitation of cortisol. Measurement of plasma corticotropin is used to separate corticotropin-dependent from corticotropin-independent causes of Cushing’s syndrome and to separate eutopic from ectopic secretion of corticotropin. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling should be performed in all patients with corticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome because of the high prevalence of nonfunctioning incidental pituitary adenomas among such patients. Measurement of plasma cortisol has only one use: determining the success or failure of transsphenoidal microadenomectomy or adrenalectomy. If the plasma cortisol level is not measurable on the morning after the operation (<5 μg per deciliter [138 μmol per liter]), the procedure was a success; if it is measurable, the operation failed. The surgeon must not administer intraoperative or postoperative synthetic glucocorticoids until the plasma cortisol level has been measured.

Successful evaluation of a patient who is suspected of having Cushing’s syndrome requires an endocrinologist who is skilled in physical diagnosis. Also required is a laboratory that measures urinary free cortisol using high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry and that can measure plasma cortisol and plasma corticotropin by means of radioimmunoassay.

Inferior petrosal sinus sampling is performed by an interventional radiologist. The treatment for all causes of Cushing’s syndrome, other than exogenous glucocorticoids, is surgical, and neurosurgeons, endocrine surgeons, and cancer surgeons are needed. This level of multidisciplinary medical expertise is usually found only at academic medical centers. Thus, most, if not all, patients with Cushing’s syndrome should be referred to such a center for treatment.

Disclosure forms provided by the author are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

SOURCE INFORMATION

From the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Loriaux at the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., L607, Portland, OR 97239-3098, or at .

From http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1505550

Adrenocortical carcinoma masquerading as Cushing’s disease

BMJ Case Reports 2017; doi:10.1136/bcr-2016-217519

Summary

Cushing’s syndrome (CS) can be classified as adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent or ACTH-independent depending on the ACTH levels.

However, 30% of the patients with CS have ACTH levels in the ‘grey zone’ (5–20 pg/mL), thereby posing a challenge in establishing the aetiological diagnosis. In a patient with full-blown features of Cushing’s syndrome with equivocal ACTH levels, and a pituitary microadenoma on contrast-enhanced MRI sella, can falsely lead to a diagnosis of Cushing’s disease. Pituitary microadenoma, if <6 mm in size, may be an incidental finding (incidentaloma) in this scenario and can be present in ∼3–27% of the healthy population. Therefore, in a patient with CS with equivocal ACTH levels and a pituitary microadenoma, multiple samplings for ACTH and adrenal imaging should be performed to exclude ACTH-independent CS and if required, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling to determine the source of ACTH excess.

Find the entire article here: http://casereports.bmj.com/content/2017/bcr-2016-217519.full

Interview with Doc Karen, Pituitary Patient and Cushing’s Advocate

Karen’s Story

Life was good! In fact, life was great! I was married to the love of my life. We had a beautiful little girl. My husband and I had both earned our graduate degrees. I earned my Doctorate in Clinical Psychology and was growing my clinical practice. I loved my work!

In October, 2006, my life was turned upside down when I gained 30 pounds in 30 days! I knew this was not normal at all. I sought answers but my doctor kept insisting that I wasn’t eating the right foods, that I wasn’t exercising hard enough, and finally that it was genetic. However, I was always a thin person, I ate pretty healthy foods, and I was pretty active. Red flags became even greater when my physician put me on prescription weight loss drugs and I STILL gained another 30 pounds. I knew my body and I knew something was wrong but I had no one to validate what was going on.

In January, 2010, to my surprise, I learned that I was miraculously pregnant with our second daughter. I was so sick during that pregnancy and,  again, my doctors couldn’t figure out why. My OBGYN was very supportive, yet so concerned. Her solution was to put me on bed rest. I became so ill that she told me that “my only job was to sit still and wait to have a baby”. I did give birth to a healthy baby girl four weeks early. Little did I know, then, how much of a miracle she was.

During the latter part of my pregnancy, while flipping through channels on television, I came across a Cushing’s episode on the health TV show, “Mystery Diagnosis”.

I knew right away that this diagnosis fit everything I had been experiencing: years of weird and unexplained symptoms, gaining 150 pounds for no reason, an onset of diabetes, high blood pressure, and an overall sense of doom.

You see, my friends and family witnessed me go from a vibrant young Clinical Psychologist in practice, to someone whose health deteriorated due to the symptoms of Cushing’s, as I tried for many years to get answers from professionals. As I continued to eat a healthy, 1000 calorie per day diet, engage in exercise with multiple personal trainers, and follow through with referrals to consult with dietitians; I continued to gain weight at a rate of 5 pounds per week and experience rapidly declining health. Finally, after watching that Cushing’s episode of Mystery Diagnosis, I found my answer! Ultimately, I sought the expertise of and treatment from a team of experts at the Seattle Pituitary Center in Seattle, WA. I had brain surgery in Seattle on November 16th, 2011. I want to tell you how I found the people who helped save my life…

On June 9, 2011, I went to my first MAGIC conference. I had never heard of them but someone on one of the online support groups told me about it.  At that time, I was working but was very, very sick. We suspected at that time that I had been sick for years! My local endocrinologist was far from a Cushing’s expert. After watching the Cushing’s episode of Mystery Diagnosis, I told the same endocrinologist who had misdiagnosed me for years that I had found my answer. He swore that there was “literally no possible way that I had Cushing’s Disease!” He stated that my “hump wasn’t big enough”, “my stretch marks were not purple enough” and that “Cushing’s patients do not have children!” I told him that I was NOT leaving his office until he started testing me. He finally caved in. To his surprise, I was getting abnormal labs back.

At that time, there was evidence of a pit tumor but it wasn’t showing up on an MRI. So, I had my IPSS scheduled. An IPSS stands for Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling. It is done because 60 % of Cushing’s based pituitary tumors are so small that they do not show up on an MRI. Non Cushing’s experts do not know this so they often blow patients off, even after the labs show a high level of ACTH in the brain through blood work. An overproduction of the hormone ACTH from the pituitary communicates to the adrenal glands to overproduce cortisol. Well, the IPSS procedure is where they put catheters up through your groin through your body up into your head to draw samples to basically see which side of your pituitary the extra hormone is coming from, thus indicating where the tumor is. U of C is the only place in IL that does it.

So, back to the MAGIC convention; my husband and I went to this conference looking for answers. We were so confused and scared!  Everyone, and I mean everyone, welcomed us with opened arms like we were family! There were brilliant presenters there, including an endocrinologist named Dr. William Ludlam. At that time, he was the director at the Seattle Pituitary Center in Seattle, WA. He is a true Cushing’s expert. Since then, he left in January, 2012 to have a significant impact toward the contribution of research of those impacted by Cushing’s Syndrome. His position was taken over by another brilliant endocrinologist, Dr. Frances Broyles.

I was scheduled to get an IPSS at U of C on June 28th, 2011 to locate the tumor. Two days after the IPSS, I began having spontaneous blackouts and ended up in the hospital for 6 days. The docs out here had no clue what was happening and I was having between 4-7 blackouts a day! My life was in danger and they were not helping me! We don’t know why, but the IPSS triggered something! But, no one wanted to be accountable so they told me the passing out, which I was not doing before, was all in my head being triggered by psychological issues. They did run many tests. But, they were all the wrong tests. I say all the time; it’s like going into Subway and ordering a turkey sandwich and giving them money and getting a tuna sandwich. You would be mad! What if they told you, “We gave you a sandwich!” Even if they were to give you a dozen sandwiches; if it wasn’t turkey, it wouldn’t be the right one. This is how I feel about these tests that they ran and said were all “normal”. The doctors kept telling us that they ran all of these tests so they could cover themselves. Yet, they were not looking at the right things, even though, I (the patient) kept telling them that this was an endocrine issue and had something to do with my tumor! Well, guess how good God is?!!!!

You see, Dr. Ludlam had given me his business card at the conference, which took place two weeks prior to the IPSS. I put it away for a while. But, something kept telling me to pull the card out and contact him. I am crying just thinking about it, Lord!

So, prior to my IPSS, I wrote Dr. Ludlam an e mail asking him some questions. At that time, he told me to send him ALL of my records including labs. I sent him 80 pages of records that day.  He called me back stating that he concurred with all of the evidence that I definitely have Cushing’s Disease from a pituitary source. He asked me what I planned to do and I told him that I was having the IPSS procedure done in a few days at the University of Chicago. He told me once I got my results to contact him.

Fast forward, I ended up in the hospital with these blackouts after my IPSS. The doctors, including MY local endocrinologist told me there was no medical evidence for my blackouts. In fact, he told the entire treatment team that he even doubted if I even had a tumor! However, this is the same man who referred me for the IPSS in the first place! I was literally dying and no one was helping me! We reached out to Dr. Ludlam in Seattle and told him of the situation. He told me he knew exactly what was going on. For some reason, there was a change in my brain tumor activity that happened after my IPSS. No one, to this day, has been able to answer the question as to whether the IPSS caused the change in tumor activity. The tumor, for some reason, began shutting itself on and off. When it would shut off, my cortisol would drop and would put me in a state of adrenal insufficiency, causing these blackouts!

Dr. Ludlam said as soon as we were discharged, we needed to fly out to Seattle so that he could help me! The hospital discharged me in worse condition then when I came in. I had a blackout an hour after discharge! But get this…The DAY the hospital sent me home saying that I did not have a pit tumor, my IPSS results were waiting for me! EVIDENCE OF TUMOR ON THE LEFT SIDE OF MY PITUITARY GLAND!!!

Two days later, Craig and I were on a plane to Seattle. I had never in my life been to Seattle, nor did I ever think I would go. We saw the man that God used to save my life, Dr. William Ludlam, the same man who we had met at the MAGIC conference for the first time one month prior! He put me on a combo of medications that would pull me out of crisis. Within one month, my blackouts had almost completely stopped! Unfortunately, we knew this was a temporary fix! He was treating me to carry me over to surgery. You see, his neurosurgeon, Dr. Marc Mayberg was just as amazing. He is one of the top neurosurgeons in the US! Statistically, he has one of the highest success rates!

The problem was that our insurance refused to pay for surgery with an expert outside of IL, stating that I could have surgery anywhere in IL! Most people don’t know that pituitary surgeries are very complicated and need the expertise of a “high volume center” which is where they do at least 50 of these surgeries per year. Dr. Mayberg has performed over 5,000 of these surgeries!  By this time, we had learned that we need to fight for the best care! It was what would give me the best chance at life! We thought I would have to wait until January when our insurance would change, to see if I could get the surgery I so desperately needed! I was holding on by a thread!

We began appealing our insurance. At the time the MAGIC foundation had an insurance specialist who was allowed to help us fight our insurance. Her name is Melissa Callahan and she took it upon herself to fight for us as our patient advocate. It was a long and hard battle! But…we finally WON!!!! On November 16th, 2011, Dr. Marc Mayberg found that hidden tumor on the left side of my pituitary gland! He removed the tumor along with 50% of my pituitary gland.

Recovery was a difficult process. They say that it takes about one full year to recover after pituitary surgery for Cushing’s. I was grateful to be in remission, nonetheless. However, about one year after my brain surgery, the Cushing’s symptoms returned. After seven more months of testing that confirmed a recurrence of the Cushing’s, I was cleared for a more aggressive surgery. This time, I had both of my adrenal glands removed as a last resort. By then, we had learned that I had hyperplasia, which is an explosion of tumor cells in my pituitary. It only takes one active cell to cause Cushing’s. Therefore, I could have potentially had several more brain surgeries and the disease would have kept coming back over and over.

As a last resort, my adrenal glands were removed so that no matter how much these cells try to cause my adrenals to produce excessive amounts of cortisol; the glands are not there to receive the message. As a result, I am Adrenally Insufficient for life, which means that my body cannot produce the life sustaining hormone, cortisol, at all. I had my Bilateral Adrenalectomy by world renowned BLA surgeon, Dr. Manfred Chiang, in Wisconsin on August 21st, 2013. I traded Cushing’s Disease for Addison’s Disease, one of the hardest decisions I have ever had to make in my life. However, I knew that I would die with Cushing’s. Recovery from my last surgery was difficult and involved weaning down to a maintenance dose of steroid to replace my cortisol. Now, on a maintenance dose; I still have to take extra cortisol during times of physical or emotional stress to prevent my body from going into shock.

I promised a long time ago that I would pay it forward…give back because so much has been given to me. This is why I have committed my life to supporting the Cushing’s community. I post videos on YouTube as a way of increasing awareness. My channel can be found at http://www.YouTube.com/drnkarenthames

Additionally, I am working on a Cushing’s documentary. Please like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/Hug.A.Cushie

Thank you for taking the time to read my story!

Karen has made 2 videos about her experiences with Cushing’s:

and

Doc Karen will be our guest in an interview on BlogTalk Radio  Friday December 2 at 11:00 AM eastern.  The Call-In number for questions or comments is (323) 642-1665 .

The archived interview will be available through iTunes Podcasts (Cushie Chats) or BlogTalkRadio.  While you’re waiting, there are currently 90 other past interviews to listen to!

%d bloggers like this: