Older Adults With Cushing’s Disease Present With Fewer Symptoms Than Younger Patients

Posted on March 7, 2025 by MaryO

Key takeaways:

  • Older age was tied to a higher prevalence of 10 comorbidities among a group of 608 people with Cushing’s disease.
  • Younger age was associated with most hallmark features of Cushing’s disease.

The presentation of Cushing’s disease varies by age, with older adults having fewer hallmark features of the condition and more comorbidities, according to study findings published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Researchers assessed data from 608 people diagnosed with Cushing’s disease and treated with a transsphenoidal tumor resection at 11 academic pituitary centers in the U.S. from 2003 to 2023 (82% women; 77.3% white). Patients were divided into 10-year age interval groups, with the youngest group consisting of those aged 10 to 19 years and the oldest containing adults aged 70 to 79 years. Researchers found Cushing’s disease presents differently as adults age, with older adults experiencing more comorbidities and complications, but fewer hallmark features such as weight gain, facial rounding and hirsutism.

“The diagnosis of Cushing’s disease remains challenging, particularly with age,” Won Kim, MD, associate clinical professor of neurosurgery and radiation oncology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, told Healio. “The older a patient is, the more likely that he or she may have a slower-growing tumor with fewer classic manifestations of the disease.”

Kim and colleagues obtained data from the Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders. Hallmark features of Cushing’s disease were identified by consensus opinion.

The number of comorbidities increased with patient age (beta = 0.0466; P < .001), according to the researchers.

Older age was associated with several comorbidities for patients with Cushing’s disease, including hypertension (P < .001), diabetes (P < .001), hyperlipidemia (P < .001), cancer (P < .001), coronary artery disease (P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .044), cardiac arrhythmia (P = .023), hepatitis (P = .038), anxiety (P = .039) and osteopenia (P = .024). The most common comorbidity was hypertension, which was prevalent in 67.2% of participants.

In an analysis of presenting hallmark features of Cushing’s disease, younger age was positively associated with weight gain (P < .001), facial rounding (P < .001), abdominal striae (P < .001), hirsutism (P < .001), menstrual irregularities (P < .001) and acne (P < .001). Older age was positively tied to obstructive sleep apnea (P = .007). The most common hallmark feature of Cushing’s disease was weight gain, prevalent in 80.2% of patients.

“Our work highlights that we must lower our threshold for suspecting Cushing’s disease in patients without the classic physical manifestations as the age of the patient increases,” Kim said in an interview. “Subtle clues, such as increasingly difficult to control medical conditions such as hypertension and diabetes, may be the only things we see.”

Older age was associated with lower preoperative 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels (beta = –0.0256; P = 6.89 x 10-7), but higher postoperative nadir cortisol (beta = 0.0342; P = 1.03 x 10-4) and higher adrenocorticotropin (beta = 0.0204; P = 5.22 x 10-4).

In an assessment of tumor characteristics, older age was tied to having a higher Knosp grade tumor (beta = 0.011; P = .00435), greater tumor volume (beta = 0.0261; P = .0233) and higher maximum tumor dimension (beta = 0.009; P = 3.82 x 10-4). Older age was inversely associated with Ki-67 index, which is a measure of tumor’s proliferation (beta = –0.0459; P = 1.39 x 10-4).

Age was not associated with a patient’s number of surgical complications. Older age was linked to a greater prevalence of deep vein thrombosis or venous thromboembolism (beta = 0.07; P = .014). Younger age was tied to a higher prevalence of postoperative arginine vasopressin (beta = –0.02; P = .048).

Kim said the study’s findings should encourage health care professionals to adjust their methods for screening for Cushing’s disease in older adults.

“Improving our diagnostic sensitivity through our standardized assessments for the disease should account for these new findings,” Kim told Healio.

For more information:

Won Kim, MD, can be reached at wonkim@mednet.ucla.edu.

Published by:endocrine today logo

Filed under: Cushing's, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Unveiling the Uncommon: Cushing’s Syndrome (CS) Masquerading as Severe Hypokalemia

Posted on July 2, 2024 by MaryO

Abstract

Cushing’s syndrome (CS) arises from an excess of endogenous or exogenous cortisol, with Cushing’s disease specifically implicating a pituitary adenoma and exaggerated adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) production. Typically, Cushing’s disease presents with characteristic symptoms such as weight gain, central obesity, moon face, and buffalo hump.

This case report presents an unusual manifestation of CS in a 48-year-old male with a history of hypertension, where severe hypokalemia was the primary presentation. Initial complaints included bilateral leg swelling, muscle weakness, occasional shortness of breath, and a general feeling of not feeling well. Subsequent investigations revealed hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis, and an abnormal response to dexamethasone suppression, raising concerns about hypercortisolism. Further tests, including 24-hour urinary free cortisol and ACTH testing, confirmed significant elevations. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified a pituitary macroadenoma, necessitating neurosurgical intervention.

This case underscores the rarity of CS presenting with severe hypokalemia, highlighting the diagnostic challenges and the crucial role of a collaborative approach in managing such intricate cases.

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome (CS), characterized by excessive cortisol production, is well-known for its diverse and often conspicuous clinical manifestations. Cushing’s disease is a subset of CS resulting from a pituitary adenoma overproducing adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), leading to heightened cortisol secretion. The classic presentation involves a spectrum of symptoms such as weight gain, central obesity, muscle weakness, and mood alterations [1].

Despite its classic presentation, CS can demonstrate diverse and atypical features, challenging conventional diagnostic paradigms. This case report sheds light on a rare manifestation of CS, where severe hypokalemia was the primary clinical indicator. Notably, instances of CS prominently manifesting through severe hypokalemia are scarce in the literature [1,2].

Through this exploration, we aim to provide valuable insights into the diagnostic intricacies of atypical CS presentations, underscore the significance of a comprehensive workup, and emphasize the collaborative approach essential for managing such uncommon hormonal disorders.

Case Presentation

A 48-year-old male with a history of hypertension presented to his primary care physician with complaints of bilateral leg swelling, occasional shortness of breath, dizziness, and a general feeling of malaise persisting for 10 days. The patient reported increased water intake and urinary frequency without dysuria. The patient was diagnosed with hypertension eight months ago. He experienced progressive muscle weakness over two months, hindering his ability to perform daily activities, including using the bathroom. The primary care physician initiated a blood workup that revealed severe hypokalemia with a potassium level of 1.3 mmol/L (reference range: 3.6 to 5.2 mmol/L), prompting referral to the hospital.

Upon admission, the patient was hypertensive with a blood pressure of 180/103 mmHg, a heart rate of 71 beats/minute, a respiratory rate of 18 breaths/minute, and an oxygen saturation of 96% on room air. Physical examination revealed fine tremors, bilateral 2+ pitting edema in the lower extremities up to mid-shin, abdominal distension with normal bowel sounds, and bilateral reduced air entry in the bases of the lungs on auscultation. The blood work showed the following findings (Table 1).

Parameter Result Reference Range
Potassium (K) 1.8 mmol/L 3.5-5.0 mmol/L
Sodium (Na) 144 mmol/L 135-145 mmol/L
Magnesium (Mg) 1.3 mg/dL 1.7-2.2 mg/dL
Hemoglobin (Hb) 15.5 g/dL 13.8-17.2 g/dL
White blood cell count (WBC) 13,000 x 103/µL 4.5 to 11.0 × 109/L
Platelets 131,000 x 109/L 150-450 x 109/L
pH 7.57 7.35-7.45
Bicarbonate (HCO3) 46 mmol/L 22-26 mmol/L
Lactic acid 4.2 mmol/L 0.5-2.0 mmol/L
Table 1: Blood work findings

In order to correct the electrolyte imbalances, the patient received intravenous (IV) magnesium and potassium replacement and was later transitioned to oral. The patient was also started on normal saline at 100 cc per hour. To further investigate the complaint of shortness of breath, the patient underwent a chest X-ray, which revealed bilateral multilobar pneumonia (Figure 1). He was subsequently treated with ceftriaxone (1 g IV daily) and clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) for seven days.

A-chest-X-ray-revealing-(arrows)-bilateral-multilobar-pneumonia
Figure 1: A chest X-ray revealing (arrows) bilateral multilobar pneumonia

With persistent abdominal pain and lactic acidosis, a computed tomography (CT) scan abdomen and pelvis with contrast was conducted, revealing a psoas muscle hematoma. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicted an 8×8 cm hematoma involving the left psoas and iliacus muscles. The interventional radiologist performed drainage of the hematoma involving the left psoas and iliacus muscles (Figure 2).

Magnetic-resonance-imaging-(MRI)-depicting-an-8x8-cm-hematoma-(arrow)-involving-the-left-psoas-and-iliacus-muscles
Figure 2: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicting an 8×8 cm hematoma (arrow) involving the left psoas and iliacus muscles

In light of the concurrent presence of hypokalemia, hypertension, and metabolic alkalosis, there arose concerns about Conn’s syndrome, prompting consultation with endocrinology. Their recommended workup for Conn’s syndrome included assessments of the aldosterone-renin ratio and random cortisol levels. The results unveiled an aldosterone level below 60 pmol/L (reference range: 190 to 830 pmol/L in SI units) and a plasma renin level of 0.2 pmol/L (reference range: 0.7 to 3.3 mcg/L/hr in SI units). Notably, the aldosterone-renin ratio was low, conclusively ruling out Conn’s syndrome. The random cortisol level was notably elevated at 1334 nmol/L (reference range: 140 to 690 nmol/L).

Furthermore, a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test was undertaken due to the high cortisol levels. Following the administration of 1 mg of dexamethasone at 10 p.m., cortisol levels were measured at 9 p.m., 3 a.m., and 9 a.m. the following day. The results unveiled a persistently elevated cortisol level surpassing 1655 nmol/L, signaling an abnormal response to dexamethasone suppression and raising concerns about a hypercortisolism disorder, such as CS.

In the intricate progression of this case, the investigation delved deeper with a 24-hour urinary free cortisol level, revealing a significant elevation at 521 mcg/day (reference range: 10 to 55 mcg/day). Subsequent testing of ACTH portrayed a markedly elevated level of 445 ng/L, distinctly exceeding the normal reference range of 7.2 to 63.3 ng/L. A high-dose 8 mg dexamethasone test was performed to ascertain the source of excess ACTH production. The baseline serum cortisol levels before the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test were 1404 nmol/L, which decreased to 612 nmol/L afterward, strongly suggesting the source of excess ACTH production to be in the pituitary gland.

A CT scan of the adrenal glands ruled out adrenal mass, while an MRI of the brain uncovered a 1.3×1.3×3.2 cm pituitary macroadenoma (Figure 3), leading to compression of adjacent structures. Neurosurgery was consulted, and they recommended surgical removal of the macroadenoma due to the tumor size and potential complications. The patient was referred to a tertiary care hospital for pituitary adenoma removal.

Magnetic-resonance-imaging-(MRI)-of-the-brain-depicting-a-1.3x1.3x3.2-cm-pituitary-macroadenoma-(star)
Figure 3: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain depicting a 1.3×1.3×3.2 cm pituitary macroadenoma (star)

Discussion

CS represents a complex endocrine disorder characterized by excessive cortisol production. While the classic presentation of CS includes weight gain, central obesity, and muscle weakness, our case highlights an uncommon initial manifestation: severe hypokalemia. This atypical presentation underscores the diverse clinical spectrum of CS and the challenges it poses in diagnosis and management [1,2].

While CS typically presents with the classic symptoms mentioned above, severe hypokalemia as the initial manifestation is exceedingly rare. Hypokalemia in CS often results from excess cortisol-mediated activation of mineralocorticoid receptors, leading to increased urinary potassium excretion and renal potassium wasting. Additionally, metabolic alkalosis secondary to cortisol excess further exacerbates hypokalemia [3,4].

Diagnosing a case of Cushing’s disease typically commences with a thorough examination of the patient’s medical history and a comprehensive physical assessment aimed at identifying characteristic manifestations such as central obesity, facial rounding, proximal muscle weakness, and increased susceptibility to bruising. Essential to confirming the diagnosis are laboratory examinations, which involve measuring cortisol levels through various tests, including 24-hour urinary free cortisol testing, late-night salivary cortisol testing, and dexamethasone suppression tests. Furthermore, assessing plasma ACTH levels aids in distinguishing between pituitary-dependent and non-pituitary causes of CS. Integral to the diagnostic process are imaging modalities such as MRI of the pituitary gland, which facilitate the visualization of adenomas and the determination of their size and precise location [1-4].

Treatment for Cushing’s disease primarily entails surgical removal of the pituitary adenoma via transsphenoidal surgery, with the aim of excising the tumor and restoring normal pituitary function. In cases where surgical intervention is unsuitable or unsuccessful, pharmacological therapies employing medications such as cabergoline (a dopamine receptor agonist) or pasireotide (a somatostatin analogue) may be considered to suppress ACTH secretion and regulate cortisol levels. Additionally, radiation therapy, whether conventional or stereotactic radiosurgery, serves as a supplementary or alternative treatment approach to reduce tumor dimensions and mitigate ACTH production [5,6]. To assess the effectiveness of treatment, manage any problem, and assure long-term illness remission, diligent long-term follow-up and monitoring are essential. Collaborative multidisciplinary care involving specialists such as endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, and other healthcare professionals is pivotal in optimizing patient outcomes and enhancing overall quality of life [2,4].

The prognosis of CS largely depends on the underlying cause, stage of the disease, and efficacy of treatment. Early recognition and prompt intervention are essential for improving outcomes and minimizing long-term complications. Surgical resection of the adrenal or pituitary tumor can lead to remission of CS in the majority of cases. However, recurrence rates vary depending on factors such as tumor size, invasiveness, and completeness of resection [2,3]. Long-term follow-up with endocrinologists is crucial for monitoring disease recurrence, assessing hormonal function, and managing comorbidities associated with CS.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our case report highlights the rarity of severe hypokalemia as the initial presentation of CS. This unique presentation underscores the diverse clinical manifestations of CS and emphasizes the diagnostic challenges encountered in clinical practice. A multidisciplinary approach involving endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, and radiologists is essential for the timely diagnosis and management of CS. Early recognition, prompt intervention, and long-term follow-up are essential for optimizing outcomes and improving the quality of life for patients with this endocrine disorder.

References

  1. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, Montori VM: The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 93:1526-40. 10.1210/jc.2008-0125
  2. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK: Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2006, 367:1605-17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68699-6
  3. Torpy DJ, Mullen N, Ilias I, Nieman LK: Association of hypertension and hypokalemia with Cushing’s syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH secretion: a series of 58 cases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 970:134-44. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04419.x
  4. Elias C, Oliveira D, Silva MM, Lourenço P: Cushing’s syndrome behind hypokalemia and severe infection: a case report. Cureus. 2022, 14:e32486. 10.7759/cureus.32486
  5. Fleseriu M, Petersenn S: Medical therapy for Cushing’s disease: adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor blockers. Pituitary. 2015, 18:245-52. 10.1007/s11102-014-0627-0
  6. Pivonello R, De Leo M, Cozzolino A, Colao A: The treatment of Cushing’s disease. Endocr Rev. 2015, 36:385-486. 10.1210/er.2013-1048

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Is Cushing Syndrome More Common in the US Than We Think?

Posted on June 11, 2024 by MaryO

I think members of the Cushing’s Help boards have been saying this forever!  Cushing’s isn’t all that rare.  Just rarely diagnosed,

 

BOSTON — The prevalence of Cushing syndrome (CS) in the United States may be considerably higher than currently appreciated, new data from a single US institution suggest.

In contrast to estimates of 1 to 3 cases per million patient-years from population-based European studies, researchers at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, estimated that the incidence of CS in Wisconsin is a minimum of 7.2 cases per million patient-years. What’s more, contrary to all previous studies, they found that adrenal Cushing syndrome was more common than pituitary adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)– secreting tumors (Cushing disease), and that fewer than half of individuals with adrenal Cushing syndrome had classic physical features of hypercortisolism, such as weight gain, round face, excessive hair growth, and stretch marks.

“Cases are absolutely being missed…. Clinicians should realize that cortisol excess is not rare. It may not be common, but it needs to be considered in patients with any constellation of features that are seen in cortisol excess,” study investigator Ty B. Carroll, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, and the Endocrine Fellowship Program Director at Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, told Medscape Medical News.

There are several contributing factors, he noted, “including the obesity and diabetes epidemics which make some clinical features of cortisol excess more common and less notable. Providers get used to seeing patients with some features of cortisol excess and don’t think to screen. The consequence of this is more difficult-to-control diabetes and hypertension, more advance metabolic bone disease, and likely more advanced cardiovascular disease, all resulting from extended exposure to cortisol excess,” he said.

Are Milder Cases the Ones Being Missed?

Asked to comment, session moderator Sharon L. Wardlaw, MD, professor of medicine at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, said “When we talk about Cushing [syndrome], we usually think of pituitary ACTH as more [common], followed by adrenal adenomas, and then ectopic. But they’re seeing more adrenal adenoma…we are probably diagnosing this a little more now.”

She also suggested that the Wisconsin group may have a lower threshold for diagnosing the milder cortisol elevation seen with adrenal Cushing syndrome. “If you screen for Cushing with a dexamethasone suppression test…[i]f you have autonomous secretion by the adrenal, you don’t suppress as much…. When you measure 24-hour urinary cortisol, it may be normal. So you’re in this in-between [state]…. Maybe in Wisconsin they’re diagnosing it more. Or, maybe it’s just being underdiagnosed in other places.”

She also pointed out that “you can’t diagnose it unless you think of it. I’m not so sure that with these mild cases it’s so much that it’s more common, but maybe it’s like thyroid nodules, where we didn’t know about it until everybody started getting all of these CT scans. We’re now seeing all these incidental thyroid nodules…I don’t think we’re missing florid Cushing.”

However, Wardlaw said, it’s probably worthwhile to detect even milder hypercortisolism because it could still have long-term damaging effects, including osteoporosis, muscle weakness, glucose intolerance, and frailty. “You could do something about it and normalize it if you found it. I think that would be the reason to do it.”

Is Wisconsin Representative of Cushing Everywhere?

Carroll presented the findings at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society. He began by noting that most of the previous CS incidence studies, with estimates of 1.2-3.2 cases per million per year, come from European data published from 1994 to 2019 and collected as far back as 1955. The method of acquisition of patients and the definitions of confirmed cases varied widely in those studies, which reported CS etiologies of ACTH-secreting neoplasms (pituitary or ectopic) in 75%-85% and adrenal-dependent cortisol excess in 15%-20%.

The current study included data from clinic records between May 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, of Wisconsin residents newly diagnosed with and treated for CS. The CS diagnosis was established with standard guideline-supported biochemical testing and appropriate imaging. Patients with exogenous and non-neoplastic hypercortisolism and those who did not receive therapy for CS were excluded.

A total of 185 patients (73% female, 27% male) were identified from 27 of the total 72 counties in Wisconsin, representing a population of 4.5 million. On the basis of the total 5.9 million population of Wisconsin, the incidence of CS in the state works out to 7.2 cases per million population per year, Carroll said.

However, data from the Wisconsin Hospital Association show that the University of Wisconsin’s Milwaukee facility treated just about half of patients in the state who are discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of CS during 2019-2023. “So…that means that an actual or approximate incidence of 14-15 cases per million per year rather than the 7.2 cases that we produce,” he said.

Etiologies were 60% adrenal (111 patients), 36.8% pituitary (68 patients), and 3.2% ectopic (6 patients). Those proportions were similar between genders.

On biochemical testing, values for late-night salivary cortisol, dexamethasone suppression, and urinary free cortisol were highest for the ectopic group (3.189 µg/dL, 42.5 µg/dL, and 1514.2 µg/24 h, respectively) and lowest for the adrenal group (0.236 µg/dL, 6.5 µg/dL, and 64.2 µg/24 h, respectively). All differences between groups were highly statistically significant, at P < .0001, Carroll noted.

Classic physical features of CS were present in 91% of people with pituitary CS and 100% of those ectopic CS but just 44% of individuals with adrenal CS. “We found that adrenal-dependent disease was the most common form of Cushing syndrome. It frequently presented without classic physical features that may be due to the milder biochemical presentation,” he concluded.

Carroll reports consulting and investigator fees from Corcept Therapeutics. Wardlaw has no disclosures. 

Miriam E. Tucker is a freelance journalist based in the Washington DC area. She is a regular contributor to Medscape, with other work appearing in The Washington Post, NPR’s Shots blog, and Diatribe. She is on X (formerly Twitter) @MiriamETucker.

1

Credit

Lead image: Designer491/Dreamstime

Medscape Medical News © 2024 WebMD, LLCSend comments and news tips to news@medscape.net.

Cite this: Is Cushing Syndrome More Common in the US Than We Think? – Medscape – June 07, 2024.

Filed under: adrenal, Cushing's, pituitary, Rare Diseases, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Unveiling the Uncommon: Cushing’s Syndrome (CS) Masquerading as Severe Hypokalemia

Posted on April 26, 2024 by MaryO

Abstract

Cushing’s syndrome (CS) arises from an excess of endogenous or exogenous cortisol, with Cushing’s disease specifically implicating a pituitary adenoma and exaggerated adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) production. Typically, Cushing’s disease presents with characteristic symptoms such as weight gain, central obesity, moon face, and buffalo hump.

This case report presents an unusual manifestation of CS in a 48-year-old male with a history of hypertension, where severe hypokalemia was the primary presentation. Initial complaints included bilateral leg swelling, muscle weakness, occasional shortness of breath, and a general feeling of not feeling well. Subsequent investigations revealed hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis, and an abnormal response to dexamethasone suppression, raising concerns about hypercortisolism. Further tests, including 24-hour urinary free cortisol and ACTH testing, confirmed significant elevations. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified a pituitary macroadenoma, necessitating neurosurgical intervention.

This case underscores the rarity of CS presenting with severe hypokalemia, highlighting the diagnostic challenges and the crucial role of a collaborative approach in managing such intricate cases.

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome (CS), characterized by excessive cortisol production, is well-known for its diverse and often conspicuous clinical manifestations. Cushing’s disease is a subset of CS resulting from a pituitary adenoma overproducing adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), leading to heightened cortisol secretion. The classic presentation involves a spectrum of symptoms such as weight gain, central obesity, muscle weakness, and mood alterations [1].

Despite its classic presentation, CS can demonstrate diverse and atypical features, challenging conventional diagnostic paradigms. This case report sheds light on a rare manifestation of CS, where severe hypokalemia was the primary clinical indicator. Notably, instances of CS prominently manifesting through severe hypokalemia are scarce in the literature [1,2].

Through this exploration, we aim to provide valuable insights into the diagnostic intricacies of atypical CS presentations, underscore the significance of a comprehensive workup, and emphasize the collaborative approach essential for managing such uncommon hormonal disorders.

Case Presentation

A 48-year-old male with a history of hypertension presented to his primary care physician with complaints of bilateral leg swelling, occasional shortness of breath, dizziness, and a general feeling of malaise persisting for 10 days. The patient reported increased water intake and urinary frequency without dysuria. The patient was diagnosed with hypertension eight months ago. He experienced progressive muscle weakness over two months, hindering his ability to perform daily activities, including using the bathroom. The primary care physician initiated a blood workup that revealed severe hypokalemia with a potassium level of 1.3 mmol/L (reference range: 3.6 to 5.2 mmol/L), prompting referral to the hospital.

Upon admission, the patient was hypertensive with a blood pressure of 180/103 mmHg, a heart rate of 71 beats/minute, a respiratory rate of 18 breaths/minute, and an oxygen saturation of 96% on room air. Physical examination revealed fine tremors, bilateral 2+ pitting edema in the lower extremities up to mid-shin, abdominal distension with normal bowel sounds, and bilateral reduced air entry in the bases of the lungs on auscultation. The blood work showed the following findings (Table 1).

Parameter Result Reference Range
Potassium (K) 1.8 mmol/L 3.5-5.0 mmol/L
Sodium (Na) 144 mmol/L 135-145 mmol/L
Magnesium (Mg) 1.3 mg/dL 1.7-2.2 mg/dL
Hemoglobin (Hb) 15.5 g/dL 13.8-17.2 g/dL
White blood cell count (WBC) 13,000 x 103/µL 4.5 to 11.0 × 109/L
Platelets 131,000 x 109/L 150-450 x 109/L
pH 7.57 7.35-7.45
Bicarbonate (HCO3) 46 mmol/L 22-26 mmol/L
Lactic acid 4.2 mmol/L 0.5-2.0 mmol/L
Table 1: Blood work findings

In order to correct the electrolyte imbalances, the patient received intravenous (IV) magnesium and potassium replacement and was later transitioned to oral. The patient was also started on normal saline at 100 cc per hour. To further investigate the complaint of shortness of breath, the patient underwent a chest X-ray, which revealed bilateral multilobar pneumonia (Figure 1). He was subsequently treated with ceftriaxone (1 g IV daily) and clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) for seven days.

A-chest-X-ray-revealing-(arrows)-bilateral-multilobar-pneumonia
Figure 1: A chest X-ray revealing (arrows) bilateral multilobar pneumonia

With persistent abdominal pain and lactic acidosis, a computed tomography (CT) scan abdomen and pelvis with contrast was conducted, revealing a psoas muscle hematoma. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicted an 8×8 cm hematoma involving the left psoas and iliacus muscles. The interventional radiologist performed drainage of the hematoma involving the left psoas and iliacus muscles (Figure 2).

Magnetic-resonance-imaging-(MRI)-depicting-an-8x8-cm-hematoma-(arrow)-involving-the-left-psoas-and-iliacus-muscles
Figure 2: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicting an 8×8 cm hematoma (arrow) involving the left psoas and iliacus muscles

In light of the concurrent presence of hypokalemia, hypertension, and metabolic alkalosis, there arose concerns about Conn’s syndrome, prompting consultation with endocrinology. Their recommended workup for Conn’s syndrome included assessments of the aldosterone-renin ratio and random cortisol levels. The results unveiled an aldosterone level below 60 pmol/L (reference range: 190 to 830 pmol/L in SI units) and a plasma renin level of 0.2 pmol/L (reference range: 0.7 to 3.3 mcg/L/hr in SI units). Notably, the aldosterone-renin ratio was low, conclusively ruling out Conn’s syndrome. The random cortisol level was notably elevated at 1334 nmol/L (reference range: 140 to 690 nmol/L).

Furthermore, a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test was undertaken due to the high cortisol levels. Following the administration of 1 mg of dexamethasone at 10 p.m., cortisol levels were measured at 9 p.m., 3 a.m., and 9 a.m. the following day. The results unveiled a persistently elevated cortisol level surpassing 1655 nmol/L, signaling an abnormal response to dexamethasone suppression and raising concerns about a hypercortisolism disorder, such as CS.

In the intricate progression of this case, the investigation delved deeper with a 24-hour urinary free cortisol level, revealing a significant elevation at 521 mcg/day (reference range: 10 to 55 mcg/day). Subsequent testing of ACTH portrayed a markedly elevated level of 445 ng/L, distinctly exceeding the normal reference range of 7.2 to 63.3 ng/L. A high-dose 8 mg dexamethasone test was performed to ascertain the source of excess ACTH production. The baseline serum cortisol levels before the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test were 1404 nmol/L, which decreased to 612 nmol/L afterward, strongly suggesting the source of excess ACTH production to be in the pituitary gland.

A CT scan of the adrenal glands ruled out adrenal mass, while an MRI of the brain uncovered a 1.3×1.3×3.2 cm pituitary macroadenoma (Figure 3), leading to compression of adjacent structures. Neurosurgery was consulted, and they recommended surgical removal of the macroadenoma due to the tumor size and potential complications. The patient was referred to a tertiary care hospital for pituitary adenoma removal.

Magnetic-resonance-imaging-(MRI)-of-the-brain-depicting-a-1.3x1.3x3.2-cm-pituitary-macroadenoma-(star)
Figure 3: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain depicting a 1.3×1.3×3.2 cm pituitary macroadenoma (star)

Discussion

CS represents a complex endocrine disorder characterized by excessive cortisol production. While the classic presentation of CS includes weight gain, central obesity, and muscle weakness, our case highlights an uncommon initial manifestation: severe hypokalemia. This atypical presentation underscores the diverse clinical spectrum of CS and the challenges it poses in diagnosis and management [1,2].

While CS typically presents with the classic symptoms mentioned above, severe hypokalemia as the initial manifestation is exceedingly rare. Hypokalemia in CS often results from excess cortisol-mediated activation of mineralocorticoid receptors, leading to increased urinary potassium excretion and renal potassium wasting. Additionally, metabolic alkalosis secondary to cortisol excess further exacerbates hypokalemia [3,4].

Diagnosing a case of Cushing’s disease typically commences with a thorough examination of the patient’s medical history and a comprehensive physical assessment aimed at identifying characteristic manifestations such as central obesity, facial rounding, proximal muscle weakness, and increased susceptibility to bruising. Essential to confirming the diagnosis are laboratory examinations, which involve measuring cortisol levels through various tests, including 24-hour urinary free cortisol testing, late-night salivary cortisol testing, and dexamethasone suppression tests. Furthermore, assessing plasma ACTH levels aids in distinguishing between pituitary-dependent and non-pituitary causes of CS. Integral to the diagnostic process are imaging modalities such as MRI of the pituitary gland, which facilitate the visualization of adenomas and the determination of their size and precise location [1-4].

Treatment for Cushing’s disease primarily entails surgical removal of the pituitary adenoma via transsphenoidal surgery, with the aim of excising the tumor and restoring normal pituitary function. In cases where surgical intervention is unsuitable or unsuccessful, pharmacological therapies employing medications such as cabergoline (a dopamine receptor agonist) or pasireotide (a somatostatin analogue) may be considered to suppress ACTH secretion and regulate cortisol levels. Additionally, radiation therapy, whether conventional or stereotactic radiosurgery, serves as a supplementary or alternative treatment approach to reduce tumor dimensions and mitigate ACTH production [5,6]. To assess the effectiveness of treatment, manage any problem, and assure long-term illness remission, diligent long-term follow-up and monitoring are essential. Collaborative multidisciplinary care involving specialists such as endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, and other healthcare professionals is pivotal in optimizing patient outcomes and enhancing overall quality of life [2,4].

The prognosis of CS largely depends on the underlying cause, stage of the disease, and efficacy of treatment. Early recognition and prompt intervention are essential for improving outcomes and minimizing long-term complications. Surgical resection of the adrenal or pituitary tumor can lead to remission of CS in the majority of cases. However, recurrence rates vary depending on factors such as tumor size, invasiveness, and completeness of resection [2,3]. Long-term follow-up with endocrinologists is crucial for monitoring disease recurrence, assessing hormonal function, and managing comorbidities associated with CS.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our case report highlights the rarity of severe hypokalemia as the initial presentation of CS. This unique presentation underscores the diverse clinical manifestations of CS and emphasizes the diagnostic challenges encountered in clinical practice. A multidisciplinary approach involving endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, and radiologists is essential for the timely diagnosis and management of CS. Early recognition, prompt intervention, and long-term follow-up are essential for optimizing outcomes and improving the quality of life for patients with this endocrine disorder.

References

  1. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, Montori VM: The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 93:1526-40. 10.1210/jc.2008-0125
  2. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK: Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2006, 367:1605-17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68699-6
  3. Torpy DJ, Mullen N, Ilias I, Nieman LK: Association of hypertension and hypokalemia with Cushing’s syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH secretion: a series of 58 cases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 970:134-44. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04419.x
  4. Elias C, Oliveira D, Silva MM, Lourenço P: Cushing’s syndrome behind hypokalemia and severe infection: a case report. Cureus. 2022, 14:e32486. 10.7759/cureus.32486
  5. Fleseriu M, Petersenn S: Medical therapy for Cushing’s disease: adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor blockers. Pituitary. 2015, 18:245-52. 10.1007/s11102-014-0627-0
  6. Pivonello R, De Leo M, Cozzolino A, Colao A: The treatment of Cushing’s disease. Endocr Rev. 2015, 36:385-486. 10.1210/er.2013-1048

Filed under: Cushing's, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a comment »

A Medical Chart Audit to Assess Endocrinologist Perceptions of the Burden of Endogenous Cushing’s Syndrome

Posted on January 27, 2024 by MaryO

Abstract

Purpose

This study was undertaken to assess the unmet needs within the endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) care paradigm from the endocrinologist’s perspective, including data abstracted from patient charts. The study evaluated endocrinologists’ perceptions on burden of illness and treatment rationale along with the long-term clinical burden of CS, tolerability of CS treatments, and healthcare resource utilization for CS.

Methods

Retrospective medical chart data from treated patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CS was abstracted using a cross-sectional survey to collect data from qualified endocrinologists. The survey included a case report form to capture patient medical chart data and a web-enabled questionnaire to capture practitioner-level data pertaining to endocrinologists’ perceptions of disease burden, CS treatments, and treatment attributes.

Results

Sixty-nine endocrinologists abstracted data from 273 unique medical charts of patients with CS. Mean patient age was 46.5 ± 13.4 years, with a 60:40 (female:male) gender split. The mean duration of endogenous CS amongst patients was 4.1 years. Chart data indicated that patients experienced a high burden of comorbidities and symptoms, including fatigue, weight gain, and muscle weakness despite multi-modal treatment. When evaluating treatments for CS, endocrinologists rated improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as the most important treatment attribute (mean score = 7.8; on a scale of 1 = Not at all important to 9 = Extremely important). Surgical intervention was the modality endocrinologists were most satisfied with, but they agreed that there was a significant unmet treatment need for patients with CS.

Conclusion

Endocrinologists recognized that patients with CS suffered from a debilitating condition with a high symptomatic and HRQoL burden and reported that improvement in HRQoL was the key treatment attribute influencing their treatment choices. This study highlights unmet needs for patients with CS. Patients with CS have a high rate of morbidity and comorbidity, even after treatment.

Introduction

Endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is a rare, debilitating disorder caused by chronic overproduction of cortisol [1,2,3]. CS has an estimated incidence of 0.7 to 2.4 cases per million per year, with a majority of cases (~ 70%) occurring in women [1, 4, 5]. Active CS is characterized by a variety of signs and symptoms, including muscle weakness, obesity, depression, menstrual changes, facial redness, decreased libido, hirsutism, acne, ecchymoses, hypertension, diabetes, and neurocognitive deficits [6]. Because of the diverse constellation of associated symptoms, many of which are common in the general population, CS can be challenging to diagnose and patients often seek input from multiple specialists (i.e., orthopedists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, and endocrinologists) prior to receiving a correct diagnosis [6].

Current treatment options for CS include surgery as the first line of treatment, followed by pharmacotherapies as the second line option and radiation therapy, among other treatments, as a potential third line option. Pharmacotherapies include steroidogenesis inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, mitotane), glucocorticoid receptor antagonists (e.g., mifepristone), and medications that inhibit tumoral ACTH secretion (e.g., pasireotide, cabergoline) [6,7,8,9,10]. These pharmacotherapies can be administered as monotherapy or in combination.

The impact of CS on overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been previously described [11]. However, studies reporting both the patient burden (via medical charts) and physician perceptions of burden are lacking, and studies examining healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and the economic burden of CS are limited. The current study reviewed medical charts of patients with CS to characterize the overall burden of CS (including symptoms, treatments, and HCRU) as well as physician perceptions of available treatments for CS and the rationale behind associated treatment decisions.

Methods

Study design and recruitment

This quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted to collect disease burden data pertaining to patients with CS from qualified physician respondents. All study materials were reviewed and granted exemption by a central Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior to study execution (Advarra; Columbia, MD; https://www.advarra.com/). HCPs were recruited via a physician panel through an independent recruitment partner (Toluna) and received an appropriate honorarium for their time participating in the study.

This study was fielded between May 26 and July 27, 2021, and involved the abstraction of retrospective medical chart data from patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CS by endocrinologists. The survey included a 45–60-min web-enabled questionnaire, including a case report form (CRF) component, to capture patient medical chart data and health care practitioner (HCP)-level data in order to assess perceptions of CS disease burden, treatments, and attributes associated with treatments. Considering the rarity of CS, each HCP was required to abstract information from a minimum of 2 patient charts, and a maximum of 8 patient charts.

Selection of study population

HCPs were able to participate in the study if they:

  1. 1.Were board-certified or board-eligible in endocrinology in the United States.
  2. 2.Had been in practice for more than 3 years and less than 35 years post residency.
  3. 3.Spent at least 25% of their professional time providing direct patient care.
  4. 4.Had treated or managed at least 40 unique patients (of any condition) in an average month.
  5. 5.Had managed (i.e., had an appointment with) at least 3 patients with CS in the past year.
  6. 6.Had access to confirmed CS patient chart(s) at the time of the study.

Each HCP who qualified to participate provided information via chart abstraction from the medical records of 2–8 patients with CS. The selected medical charts were from patients ≥ 21 years of age who had received a physician confirmed diagnosis of CS at least 3 months before the time of the study, and had received at least one therapy (surgical, radiological, or pharmacological) to treat their CS within the past 12 months. Patients who were diagnosed with adrenal or pituitary carcinomas were excluded.

Data analysis

The data analysis was conducted in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and Q Research Software 5.6. (Q Research Software, New York, NY). After pilot interviews and throughout the fielding, quality control checks of all the case report forms were conducted to ensure that charts with logical inconsistencies were removed from the sample. Descriptive statistics (such as means, medians, and frequencies) were used to describe the study population across various patient and physician level metrics.

Results

Endocrinologists’ demographics and practice characteristics

Endocrinologists’ demographic information and practice characteristics are presented in Table 1. A total of 69 endocrinologists were surveyed and they provided information on 273 unique patient charts. The majority of the 69 endocrinologists surveyed (53/69, 73%) were male. The mean (± SD) time in practice was 17.3 (± 7.6) years. The majority of endocrinologists (35/69, 51%) worked in urban practices and were in private practice settings (47/69, 68%) (Table 1). The sample was almost equally distributed between physicians from the northern (26%), southern (29%), eastern (25%) and western (22%) regions of the United States. The mean (± SD) estimated number of patients with endogenous CS seen in the last 6 months was 30 (± 34.4) patients.

Table 1 Endocrinologist demographics and practice characteristics

aEndocrinologist were allowed to select multiple practice settings, if applicable

Patient demographics

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics at the time of the survey are shown in Table 2. The majority of patients (165/273, 60%) were female with a mean (± SD) age at diagnosis of 40.2 (± 12.3) years and a mean (± SD) age at the most recent visit of 46.5 (± 13.4) years. Mean (± SD) BMI was 33.3 (± 8.3) kg/m2, with 50.5% of patients categorized as obese, 33.0% of patients categorized as overweight, 14.7% of patients categorized as normal or healthy weight, and 1.8% of patients categorized as underweight (Table 2). Most patients (167/273, 61%) had private or commercial health insurance. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics at disease diagnosis are shown in Table 2. A majority of patients (194/273, 79%) originally saw their primary care physician (PCP) prior to diagnosis and were diagnosed in a private practice setting (182/273, 67%). At the time of diagnosis, 46/273 patients (17%) had poor health, 107/273 patients (39%) had fair health, 68/273 patients (25%) had neutral health, 45/273 patients (16%) had good health, and 7/273 patients (3%) had excellent health, according to the responding physician.

Table 2 Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and therapy experience at diagnosis and time of the study

Treatment of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome

The patient treatment experience at the time of the study is presented in Table 2. Of the 273 patients, 79 (28.9%) underwent surgery only, 11 patients (4.0%) underwent surgery and radiation therapy, 4 patients (1.4%) underwent radiation therapy and pharmacotherapy, 5 patients (1.8%) underwent surgery, radiation therapy, and pharmacotherapy, 85 patients (31.1%) underwent surgery and pharmacotherapy, 2 patients (< 1%) underwent radiation alone and 87 patients (31.9%) underwent pharmacotherapy alone.

Symptomatic burden of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome

At diagnosis, 34% of patients presented with 1–3 symptoms, 33% of patients presented with 4–6 symptoms, 20% of patients presented with 7–9 symptoms, 8% of patients presented with 10–12 symptoms, and 5% of patients presented with > 13 symptoms (Fig. 1). Symptoms of CS at the time of diagnosis are shown in Fig. 2. The top 10 most common symptoms of CS at the time of diagnosis (Fig. 3) included fatigue, weight gain (in the midsection and upper back), acne, muscle weakness, facial weight gain (i.e., facial roundness), decreased libido, headache, edema, emotional lability, and hirsutism. Although symptoms decreased post-treatment, a large proportion of subjects still exhibited these symptoms post-treatment (Fig. 3). The most commonly reported comorbidities observed in patients with CS at the time of CS diagnosis (i.e., those affecting ≥ 20% of patients) included obesity, hypertension, depression, diabetes, dyslipidemia, anxiety, and impaired glucose tolerance (Table 2).

Fig. 1

figure 1

Number of CS symptoms reported at diagnosis

Fig. 2

figure 2

Symptoms of CS at diagnosis (N = 273)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Top 10 symptoms of CS over time. Responses were restricted for Erectile Dysfunction and Irregular Menstrual Periods. Hirsutism was not restricted to females only. All denominators in the table reflect the entire patient cohort, while the metrics below are based on only the affected genders: Female Only Hirsutism: 19% of the cohort (= 52/273), 32% of the females (= 52/165), Erectile Dysfunction: 6% of the cohort (= 17/273), 16% of the males (= 17/108) and, Irregular Menstrual Period: 11% of the cohort (= 30/273), 18% of the females (= 30/165)

Economic burden of Cushing’s syndrome

Healthcare resource utilization was assessed (Table 3). Patients required a mean (± SD) of 1 (± 1.4) hospitalization annually with a mean (± SD) length of impatient stay of 4.3 (± 3.1) days. Patients required a mean (± SD) of 0.6 (± 1.3) annual emergency room (ER) visits, and 4.3 (± 6.3) outpatient visits.

Table 3 Healthcare resource utilization

Endocrinologists’ perceptions of disease burden

Endocrinologists were asked if they agreed with a series of statements regarding their perception of CS burden and impact on a scale of 1–9, where 1 = Not at all agree and 9 = Completely agree (Fig. 4). The highest proportion of endocrinologists responded “Completely agree” with the statements “CS patients can have reduced ability to function at work or school due to their condition” (percent of endocrinologists who responded “Completely agree” = 35%), “patients with CS feel the impact of their condition every day” (30%), that “CS is a debilitating condition” (28%), “patients with CS often have impaired health-related quality of life” (28%), and “CS results in sleep disturbances that adversely impact patient’s HRQoL” (26%).

Fig. 4

figure 4

Physicians’ perceptions of CS burden and impact. On a scale of 1–9, where 1 = Not at all agree and 9 = Completely agree

Endocrinologists’ treatment perceptions

Endocrinologists were asked for their perceptions of the most important treatment attributes on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = the least important and 5 = the most important (Table 4). The two most important treatment attributes included treatments that were efficacious post-surgery (mean score = 4.0) and efficacious as a combination therapy (3.7). Endocrinologists were asked to rank satisfaction with currently available treatments for CS including surgical intervention, pharmacotherapy, and radiological or other interventions on a scale of 1–9, where 1 = Not at all satisfied and 9 = Extremely satisfied (Table 5). Overall, endocrinologists reported highest satisfaction with surgical intervention with regards to initial efficacy (mean score = 7.2), durability (6.9), safety (6.3), side effects (6.2), tolerability (6.4), and patient’s overall experience (6.9). Endocrinologists also ranked pharmacotherapy higher than radiation therapy for the treatment of CS for initial efficacy (5.9 versus 5.2), safety (5.9 versus 5.4), side effects (5.3 versus 5.2), tolerability (5.7 versus 5.5), and patient’s overall experience (5.9 versus 5.4).

Table 4 Top 5 highest rated treatment attributes
Table 5 Physicians’ satisfaction across therapeutic categories

Endocrinologists’ attitudes toward treatments and interventions

Key factors for evaluating and selecting a CS treatment were rated on a scale of 1–9, with 1 = Not at all important and 9 = Extremely important (Fig. 5). Improving HRQoL (mean score = 7.8) was rated as the most important attribute. Similarly, improving cardiovascular complications/events (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke, embolism) (7.6), psychiatric symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, mood changes) (7.6), skeletal/muscular symptoms (e.g., muscular weakness, decrease in bone mineral density, bone fractures) (7.5), and neurologic symptoms (e.g., headaches, memory, and cognitive difficulties including brain fog) (7.5) were ranked as key factors when choosing CS treatment. While factors in the survey such as “causes high rate of adrenal insufficiency” and “label contains a warning against use in CS” were ranked as less important, none of the factors listed were considered unimportant by physician respondents for choosing CS treatment.

Fig. 5

figure 5

Key factors for evaluating CS treatments that influence medication selection. On a scale of 1–9, where 1 = Not at all important and 9 = Extremely important

Endocrinologists were asked if they agreed with a series of statements regarding CS treatment and intervention attitudes on a scale of 1–9, where 1 = strongly disagree and 9 = strongly agree (Table 6). The three highest scoring statements were “there is a significant clinical unmet need for patients with endogenous CS” (mean score = 6.6), “better patient support services for CS medications often leads to better patient adherence” (6.5), and “patient out of pocket cost is a significant burden for CS patients on a pharmacological therapy” (6.5). The lowest scoring statement was “patient out of pocket cost is not a significant factor when prescribing pharmacological therapy for my CS patients” (4.6).

Table 6 Physicians’ attitudes toward CS treatment and intervention

Discussion

This study provides valuable information on the physician’s perspective of unmet needs and treatment goals for patients with CS. Endocrinologists in our sample strongly agreed that patients with CS suffered from a debilitating daily condition with a high HRQoL burden. Endocrinologists also strongly agreed with the view that “there is a significant clinical unmet need for patients with endogenous CS” and ranked prescribing treatments to improve HRQoL, cardiovascular events, depression, and anxiety as key factors influencing treatment decisions. The importance providers place on the availability of post-surgery treatment options reflects the inability of many patients with CS to achieve complete post-surgical symptom resolution and suggests all symptoms in patients with CS are not currently addressed with available treatments.

Multiple treatment modalities were utilized by endocrinologists in the care of patients with CS, including surgery, pharmacotherapy, and/or radiation therapy. Improvement in HRQoL was the key treatment attribute influencing CS treatment choices, followed by the goal of reducing cardiovascular complications, and decreasing psychiatric symptoms. However, the prevalence of comorbidities after CS treatment as well as endocrinologists’ perceptions and attitudes regarding an unmet need for CS treatments and ongoing disease burden showed that few therapies are able to improve patients’ ongoing disease burden. New CS treatments are needed that have long-term efficacy, fewer side effects, and effective reimbursement.

Patients with CS have a high symptomatic disease burden at diagnosis. This study and others have demonstrated that many of these signs and symptoms (e.g., hypertension, obesity, and depression) persist even after receiving treatment aimed at normalizing cortisol levels [12,13,14,15]. Results from the present study show that many patients continue to experience fatigue, weight gain, muscle weakness, and emotional lability even after treatment, indicating an unmet need for CS treatments that can effectively manage these persistent symptoms. The persistence of symptoms after treatment for CS is likely multifactorial, and may, at least in part, be due to complications of prolonged hypercortisolism, given diagnostic and treatment delays; however, the ability to predict which patients will continue to experience persistent symptoms after treatment is challenging [14, 16, 17]. Additionally, the effects of inadequate cortisol control, symptoms due to glucocorticoid withdrawal, and side effects from medications taken to address comorbidities may contribute to persistent symptoms after treatment for CS. Although there are currently established reference values and treatment guidelines used to stratify patients, there are no current clear guidelines on management of ongoing symptoms after cortisol levels have been addressed [18]. Additionally, the present study indicated that only 32% of patients were diagnosed at the first presentation of their CS symptoms, underscoring the importance of increasing awareness of CS and its presentation among PCPs to expedite diagnosis and treatment.

The economic burden of illness from CS includes both the direct impact on HCRU, and the indirect impact on the patient due to loss of work productivity. The present study determined that the mean (± SD) annual number of hospitalization among patients with CS was 1 (± 1.4) day with an average length of inpatient stay of 4.3 days, similar in duration to the mean length of stay for all hospitalizations in the US [19]. However, the average number of outpatient visits among patients with CS was 4.3 visits per year, slightly lower than described in a recent study of patients with CS [11], but almost twice the rate of the average American, indicating a substantial direct cost burden [20]. Patients’ reduced ability to function at work or at school could limit their full economic potential, not only for themselves, but for family members and caregivers, indicating an indirect economic cost.

The degree of concordance between patients’ chart data and the perceptions of providers regarding disease symptoms is an important issue raised, but not directly addressed, by this study. Although endocrinologists agreed that there was a high HRQoL burden attributable to CS, this study did not analyze patients’ perceptions of HRQoL burden of CS. Discordance between patients’ perceptions and the perceptions of their healthcare providers, as well as the tendency of providers to perceive disease burden as less impactful or severe than is perceived by patients, has been reported in other medical conditions such as acromegaly, rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain. The result of this is often worse medical outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or worse pain and functioning in patients with chronic pain [21,22,23,24]. Further study is necessary to analyze the concordance between the perceptions of physicians and patients with CS.

A recent cross-sectional web-enabled survey burden of illness study and a recent systemic literature review [11, 25, 26], conducted by the authors of this study, elucidated both the burden of CS as well as unmet needs in the healthcare system for patients with CS. The results of the current study corroborate the findings of both of these studies, confirming that patients experience a substantial and complex burden of cumulative CS symptoms that impacts their HRQoL. Similar to prior studies, the current results also demonstrate that although symptoms improve with treatment, some symptoms such as weight gain, pain, and anxiety persist even after treatment interventions, including surgery, pharmacotherapy, and radiation therapy. Patients with CS have previously been shown to have worse HRQoL scores compared to healthy counterparts [26], underscoring the long-term effects of CS despite treatment. This study and others have demonstrated that current therapies do not completely mitigate this HRQoL burden and indicate an unmet need among many patients with CS for additional treatments to control symptoms after cortisol level normalization.

Study limitations

During the time in which this study was conducted, additional CS treatments could have been approved, potentially changing the treatment landscape, and thereby altering the proportion of patients that continued to have symptoms after treatment (Fig. 3) or the proportion of patients with a particular comorbidity after treatment. Physician response may have been subject to recall bias; although this may have been mitigated by the use of patient chart data the possibility that details were omitted at the time of patient visits exists. Additionally, when physicians were asked about working in a Center of Excellence, the term was not explicitly defined which may have led to varying interpretations by respondents. Due to the nature of the method used (i.e., a survey given to endocrinologists treating patients at the present time), we have limited historical chart data on the entire medical journey of each patient and all important medical events may not have been captured. For example, treatments administered to patients prior to this study (i.e., those administered by previous doctors or from a different hospital) may not be present in the patients’ charts and were not captured by our survey. Additionally, we did not capture biochemical data to make definitive statements on disease status based on patient cortisol levels. Updated guidelines on cortisol levels indicative of disease severity have recently been issued by the Pituitary Society [18], and a shift toward standardized clinical guidelines may help physicians provide timely and appropriate treatment for patients with CS. Future patient-centered research in CS should focus on identifying biomarkers associated with persistent symptoms after initial treatment, which could influence the development of guidelines for managing ongoing symptoms as current treatments are focused on cortisol management. The cohort of patients with CS included in our study is also not representative of the full spectrum of patients with CS as they were required to have received at least one pharmacological therapy to be eligible for the study. This requirement was added to our eligibility criteria as the aim of our study was to evaluate the burden of illness faced by patients with Cushing’s Syndrome, post-treatment, in the real world. Future studies evaluating concordance between patient chart data and physician perceptions of CS symptoms are also likely to be of interest. Finally, patient symptoms in this study could potentially have been masked due to the use of over-the-counter medications or other prescription treatments not fully captured in charts.

Conclusion

Patients with CS continue to experience symptoms such as fatigue, weight gain, muscle weakness, and emotional instability even after seeking and receiving treatment, indicating an unmet need for treatments that control symptoms. Future research is needed to develop a treatment paradigm that alleviates disease burden in patients with CS and that results in long-term disease control with a favorable side effect profile.

Data availability

The authors confirm that all pertinent data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript or Supplementary Materials.

Consent to publish

Study participants consented to the publication of their data anonymously on an aggregate basis.

References

  1. Lacroix A et al (2015) Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 386(9996):913–927

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hopkins RL, Leinung MC (2005) Exogenous Cushing’s syndrome and glucocorticoid withdrawal. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 34(2):371–384, ix

  3. NORD (2021) Cushing syndrome. NORD. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/cushing-syndrome/

  4. Wengander S et al (2019) The incidence of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome in the modern era. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 91(2):263–270

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hakami OA, Ahmed S, Karavitaki N (2021) Epidemiology and mortality of Cushing’s syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 35(1):101521

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nieman LK (2015) Cushing’s syndrome: update on signs, symptoms and biochemical screening. Eur J Endocrinol 173(4):M33–M38

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. Castinetti F, Conte-Devolx B, Brue T (2010) Medical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: glucocorticoid receptor antagonists and mifepristone. Neuroendocrinology 92(Suppl 1):125–130

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Castinetti F, Brue T, Conte-Devolx B (2012) The use of the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone in Cushing’s syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 19(4):295–299

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sharma ST, Nieman LK, Feelders RA (2015) Cushing’s syndrome: epidemiology and developments in disease management. Clin Epidemiol 7:281–293

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  10. Hinojosa-Amaya JM, Cuevas-Ramos D, Fleseriu M (2019) Medical management of Cushing’s syndrome: current and emerging treatments. Drugs 79(9):935–956

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Page-Wilson G et al (2023) Evaluating the burden of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome using a web-based questionnaire and validated patient-reported outcome measures. Pituitary 26(4):1–11

    Article Google Scholar

  12. Pivonello R et al (2016) Complications of Cushing’s syndrome: state of the art. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4(7):611–629

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Pertichetti M et al (2020) Pituitary adenomas and neuropsychological status: a systematic literature review. Neurosurg Rev 43(4):1065–1078

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Andela CD et al (2015) Mechanisms in endocrinology: Cushing’s syndrome causes irreversible effects on the human brain: a systematic review of structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Eur J Endocrinol 173(1):R1-14

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Papakokkinou E et al (2020) Excess morbidity persists in patients with Cushing’s disease during long-term remission: a Swedish nationwide study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(8):dgaa291

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros AL et al (2013) Persistence of Cushing’s disease symptoms and comorbidities after surgical cure: a long-term, integral evaluation. Endocr Pract 19(2):252–258

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Bhattacharyya A et al (2005) Steroid withdrawal syndrome after successful treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: a reminder. Eur J Endocrinol 153(2):207–210

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Fleseriu M et al (2021) Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(12):847–875

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  19. Freeman W, Weiss A, Heslin K (2018) Overview of U.S. hospital stays in 2016: variation by geographic region. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb246-Geographic-Variation-Hospital-Stays.jsp

  20. Control, C.f.D. National Center for Health Statistics (2023) Ambulatory care use and physician office visits. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/physician-visits.htm

  21. Michelsen B et al (2017) Discordance between tender and swollen joint count as well as patient’s and evaluator’s global assessment may reduce likelihood of remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: data from the prospective multicentre NOR-DMARD study. Ann Rheum Dis 76(4):708–711

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Smolen JS et al (2016) Discordance between patient and physician assessments of global disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and association with work productivity. Arthritis Res Ther 18(1):114

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  23. Geer EB et al (2020) Observed discordance between outcomes reported by acromegaly patients and their treating endocrinology medical provider. Pituitary 23(2):140–148

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Panda M et al (2006) The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Am J Med Sci 332(1):18–23

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Page-Wilson GO, Maguire A, O’Hara M, Moloney S, Eliza G (2022) Patient-reported burden of illness in endogenous Cushing’s syndrome

  26. Page-Wilson GO, Bhagyashree O, Silber A, Meyer J, O’Hara M, Geer E (2022) Physician perceptions on the treatment and health-related quality of life burden of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome

Download references

Acknowledgements

Medical editorial assistance was provided by Amal Gulaid, MPH from Trinity Life Sciences. Medical writing assistance was provided by Iona Bartek, PhD. Funding for this study was provided by Strongbridge Biopharma plc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris BioPharma Holdings, Inc.

Target Journal

Pituitary.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by Strongbridge Biopharma plc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. Gabrielle Page-Wilson, MD and Eliza B. Geer, MD were contracted by Strongbridge Biopharma, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. to provide expert guidance for this study. Bhagyashree Oak, PhD, Abigail Silber, MPH, and Mathew O’Hara, MBA are employees of Trinity Life Sciences, which was commissioned by Strongbridge Biopharma, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. to conduct the current study. James Meyer, MBA, PharmD is an employee and shareholder of Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Endocrinology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Gabrielle Page-Wilson

    1. Trinity Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA

      Bhagyashree Oak, Abigail Silber & Matthew O’Hara

    2. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA

      James Meyer

    3. Multidisciplinary Pituitary and Skull Base Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA

      Eliza B. Geer

    Contributions

    All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Study material preparation, data collection, analyses, and manuscript development were conducted by BO, AS, and MO. JM provided overall strategic guidance. GP-W and EBG provided expert reviews of the work. All authors read and approved the final published version.

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Eliza B. Geer.

    Ethics declarations

    Conflict of interest

    Funding for this study was provided by Strongbridge Biopharma plc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. Gabrielle Page-Wilson, MD and Eliza B. Geer, MD were contracted by Strongbridge Biopharma, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. to provide expert guidance for this study. Bhagyashree Oak, PhD, Abigail Silber, MPH, and Mathew O’Hara, MBA are employees of Trinity Life Sciences, which was commissioned by Strongbridge Biopharma, a wholly owned subsidiary of Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. to conduct the current study. James Meyer, MBA, PharmD is an employee and shareholder of Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

    Ethical approval

    This was an observational study conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. As this was not a randomized clinical trial, the study was not registered as such. The ADVARRA Institutional Review Board (Columbia, MD; https://www.advarra.com/) has granted the study exemption from IRB oversight using the Department of Health and Human Services regulations found at 45 CFR 46.104(d)(2). The IRB also completed the necessary additional limited review considerations as set forth under the Revised Common Rule, 45 CFR 46.104(d).

    Informed consent

    Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study during the screening process and this was required to successfully enroll into the study. Participants were able to exit the study at any time or refuse to answer any questions.

    Additional information

    Publisher’s Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Filed under: Cushing's, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »