Medium and Long-Term Data from a Series of 96 Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgeries for Cushing Disease

Objective

Postoperative data on Cushing’s disease (CD) are equivocal in the literature. These discrepancies may be attributed to different series with different criteria for remission and variable follow-up durations. Additional data from experienced centers may address these discrepancies. In this study, we present the results obtained from 96 endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries (ETSSs) for CD conducted in a well-experienced center.

Methods

Pre- and postoperative data of 96 ETSS in 87 patients with CD were included. All cases were handled by the same neurosurgical team between 2014 and 2022. We obtained data on remission status 3−6 months postoperatively (medium-term) and during the latest follow-up (long-term). Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathology results were obtained for each case.

Results

The mean follow-up duration was 39.5±3.2 months. Medium and long-term remission rates were 77% and 82%, respectively. When only first-time operations were considered, the medium- and long-term remission rates were 78% and 82%, respectively. The recurrence rate in this series was 2.5%. Patients who showed remission between 3−6 months had higher longterm remission rates than did those without initial remission. Tumors >2 cm and extended tumor invasion of the cavernous sinus (Knosp 4) were associated with lower postoperative remission rates.

Conclusion

Adenoma size and the presence/absence of cavernous sinus invasion on preopera-tive MRI may predict long-term postoperative remission. A tumor size of 2 cm may be a supporting criterion for predicting remission in Knosp 4 tumors. Further studies with larger patient populations are necessary to support this finding.

Key WordsComplete remission · Neuroendoscopy · Pituitary-dependant Cushing syndrome · Treatment outcome.

Go to : Goto

INTRODUCTION

Cushing’s disease (CD) is characterized by excessive secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by a corticotropic adenoma in the pituitary gland. In patients with CD whose hypercortisolism is inadequately corrected, morbidity and mortality can increase by up to 4.8 times due to Cushingrelated complications such as osteoporosis, hypertension, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hypercoagulability [11,18].
Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS), the first-line treatment for CD [7], is performed to decrease complications while achieving remission and long-term disease control. Previous studies on CD have reported varying remission rates between 45% and 95% and recurrence rates ranging from 3−66% [2,4,9,16,21,30]. This wide range of differences can be primarily attributed to differences in surgical experience among centers: centers with higher surgical experience have fewer postoperative complications and higher remission rates [4,6]. However, despite initial remission, patients with CD may eventually experience recurrence. The mean recurrence rate at the 5-10-year follow-up is 23% for microadenomas and 33% for macroadenomas [19,23,30].
Since the postoperative rates in the literature are variable, additional data from experienced centers may be necessary to resolve these discrepancies. In this study, we present the medium- and long-term follow-up data from 96 operations for CD that were conducted in a center with a high level of experience for ETSS.
Go to : Goto

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital (No. 2022185). Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
This retrospective study included pre and postoperative data of 96 ETSS performed in 87 patients with CD (Fig. 1). CD was diagnosed based on unsuppressed cortisol levels (>1.8 µg/dL) following the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test, high levels of urinary free cortisol, or late night salivary cortisol and plasma ACTH levels >20 pg/mL [28]. Between 2014 and 2022, all surgeries were conducted by the experienced neurosurgical team (Ö.G., O.T., B.E., E.A.) responsible for endoscopic transsphenoidal procedures at the Pituitary Research Center. The surgeries were performed under perioperative glucocorticoid coverage.

jkns-2023-0100f1.jpg
Fig. 1.
Number of operations and patients included in the study.

Download Figure

Size, cavernous sinus invasion, sellar and suprasellar infiltration of adenoma on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, residual tumor on postoperative MRI scans, postoperative complications, pathology results, remission and recurrence status, and additional postoperative management were evaluated in addition to patients’ demographic data. For follow-up assessments, data obtained 3−6 months postoperatively and during the latest follow-up were included. Three different classifications obtained during radiologic evaluation using MRI were used for pituitary adenomas : 1) maximum size of tumor (MST) : 0−5 mm (group 1), 6−10 mm (group 2), 11−20 mm (group 3), and >20 mm (group 4); 2) Knosp classification : for evaluation of cavernous sinus invasion [22]; and 3) modified Hardy classification : for evaluation of sellar and suprasellar infiltrations [20,39].
In cases of CD without a lesion or with a lesion <6 mm on MRI, confirmation of the central origin and lateralization was provided by inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) with corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation [25,26,29]. Under neuronavigation guidance, pure ETSS surgical interventions were performed for all patients by a single surgical team using the Medtronic StealthStation S7 and S8 systems (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) together with 4-mm 0°, 30°, and 45° rigid optical instruments and an endoscope. A nasal decongestant spray was administered 1 hour before the operation. The sphenoid ostium was detected from both nostrils, and a bi-nostril approach was used by resecting the posterior nasal septum. After sphenoidectomy, the standard sellar approach was used for lesions in the sellar region. The details of these surgical procedures are described in previous study [14]. Selective adenectomy with ETSS was performed for preoperatively localized and visible tumors, whereas hemihypophysectomy was performed for non-lesional cases. In cases with cavernous sinus-invading tumors, particularly Knops 3-4, the defect which was created by the tumor on the medial wall of anterior cavernous sinus was identified and, it was expanded for resection of the tumor tissue within the cavernous sinus. If a defect was not visible, blunt-ended hook-shaped dissectors were used to create a defect on the medial wall, allowing access for the tumor to enter the cavernous sinus. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry staining were performed for the specimens obtained during ETSS. Adenomas showing positive immunohistological staining for ACTH were diagnosed histologically as corticotropinomas.
CD was considered to be in remission when the cases showed basal cortisol levels <5 µg/dL or suppressed cortisol levels (≤1.8 µg/dL) following the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test, 3-6 months postoperation, and during the latest follow-up. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our institution.
Data were statistically analyzed using the SPSS 15.0 package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Sample distribution was evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous independent variables with a normal distribution were compared using the Student’s t-test. Continuous variables with non-normal distributions were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to determine probability and time to recurrence in cases with initial remission.
Go to : Goto

RESULTS

Demographic data

A total of 96 ETSS were performed for 87 patients with CD. Of the 87 patients, 68 (79%) were female, and 19 (21%) were male. The mean patient age was 42.2±12.9 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 39.5±3.2 months. Of the 96 surgeries, 79 (82%) were performed for the first time, six (6%) were performed for residual tumors, and 11 (12%) were performed following a recurrence of the disease. Eight of the 17 patients who underwent reoperations had undergone their first operation at another center.

Preoperative imaging

Table 1 shows the maximum tumor size on preoperative pituitary MRI before each surgical procedure. Preoperative IPSS for lateralization was performed in 42 operations (44%), all of which were first-time cases. Knosp classification based on preoperative pituitary MRI and the modified Hardy classification is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Preoperative pituitary magnetic resonance imaging scans

Number of tumors (n=96)
Maximum tumor size
 Group 1, 0−5 mm 41 (42.7)
 Group 2, 6−10 mm 24 (25.0)
 Group 3, 11−20 mm 20 (20.8)
 Group 4, >20 mm 11 (11.5)
Knosp classification
 Grade 0 52 (54.2)
 Grade 1 22 (22.9)
 Grade 2 6 (6.3)
 Grade 3 8 (8.3)
 Grade 4 8 (8.3)
Modified Hardy classification
 0
  A 41 (42.8)
  B
  C
  D
  E
 1
  A 14 (14.6)
  B
  C
  D
  E 4 (4.2)
 2
  A 5 (5.2)
  B
  C
  D
  E 5 (5.2)
 3
  A 1 (1.0)
  B 2 (2.1)
  C
  D
  E 1 (1.0)
 4
  A 1 (1.0)
  B
  C
  D 1 (1.0)
  E 3 (3.1)
 NA 18 (18.8)

Values are presented as number (%). Invasion : 0, sella normal; 1, sella focally expanded and tumor ≤10 mm; 2, sella enlarged and tumor ≥10 mm; 3, localized perforation of the sellar floor; 4, diffuse destruction of the sellar floor. Suprasellar extension : A, no suprasellar extension; B, anterior recesses of the third ventricle obliterated; C, floor of the third ventricle grossly displaced with parasellar extension; D, intracranial (intradural) : anterior, middle or middle fossa; E, into/beneath the cavernous sinus (extradural).

NA : not available

Download Table

Postoperative results

Remission was achieved between the 3rd and 6th months in 74 (77%) of the 96 operations, and long-term remission in 79 operations (82%). Among all 96 operations, eight (8%) concluded with a residual tumor. Regarding only first-time operations, five (6%) of the 79 concluded with a postoperative residual tumor. Of the 79 first-time operations, there were 62 cases (78%) of remission between 3 and 6 months. Two (2.5%) of these 79 operations involved recurrence during follow-up, while 60 (97%) showed sustained remission. Those with sustained remission had a median disease-free survival time of 31 months (interquartile range, 14-64) during long-term followup, two cases with recurrence had their recurrence 49 and 54 months after their operation. Survival analysis of cases with remisson and recurrence is presented in Fig. 2. CD persisted after 17 (21.5%) of the 79 first operations.

jkns-2023-0100f2.jpg
Fig. 2.
Survival analysis after the first operation in cases with remission at 3-6 months. Dashed line represents cases with recurrence and, straight line represents cases with sustained remission during long-term follow-up.

Download Figure

Ten (13%) of the 79 cases underwent reoperation; two were due to recurrence, and eight due to disease persistence. In five cases (29%), the patients were initially unresponsive but showed remission later during the long-term follow-up. Remission was achieved with stereotactic radiosurgery (STRS) and medical treatment in one of these cases, with only STRS in two and only medical treatment in two cases. At the latest follow-up visit, the total number of cases showing remission after the first operation was 65 (82%). Additional details regarding the results of the first operations are provided in Fig. 3.

jkns-2023-0100f3.jpg
Fig. 3.
Results of the cases who had operation for the first time.

Download Figure

Of the 18 reoperations, the results for one case were excluded since the patient was operated at another center. After the reoperation (n=17), the medium and long-term remission rates were 71% (n=12) and 77% (n=13), respectively. The 3-6-month remission rate did not differ significantly between first-time and reoperations (p=0.5). Residual tumors were present in three cases (18%) after reoperation. Of the early non-responders, one case showed remission after STRS, and none of the responders showed recurrence during long-term follow-up. Additional details regarding the results of reoperations are provided in Fig. 4.

jkns-2023-0100f4.jpg
Fig. 4.
Results of the reoperations in our center.

Download Figure

Remission rates based on tumor size are presented in Table 2. The initial remission rates of the tumors in MST group 4 were significantly lower than those in the other MST groups (MST 1 vs. 4, p=0.01; MST 2 vs. 4, p=0.001; and MST 3 vs. 4, p=0.006). Comparisons of the other MST groups showed no significant differences. When adenomas were stratified using the 10-mm cut-off, the remission rates did not differ significantly (remission rate, 81% for adenomas <10 mm and 68% for adenomas ≥10 mm; p=0.2). Postoperative residual tumors were observed in five of the 11 tumors (46%) >2 cm (MST group 4) and in one tumor in each of MST groups 1-3 (2%, 4%, and 5%, respectively, p<0.001). Reoperation rate was 17% (n=7) for adenomas ≤5 mm, 18% (n=10) for adenomas ≥6 mm (p=0.9), and 27% (n=3) for adenomas >20 mm (among all grades, p=0.3).

Table 2.

Comparison of remission rates in preoperative pituitary magnetic resonance imaging scans

3−6-month remission Long-term remission
Maximum tumor size
 Group 1, 0−5 mm (n=41) 31 (75.6) 33 (80.5)
 Group 2, 6−10 mm (n=24) 22 (91.7) 22 (91.7)
 Group 3, 10−20 mm (n=20) 17 (85.0) 17 (85.0)
 Group 4, >20 mm (n=11) 4 (36.4) 7 (63.6)
p-value 0.003* 0.200
Knops classification
 0 (n=52) 41 (78.8) 44 (84.6)
 1 (n=22) 21 (95.5) 21 (95.5)
 2 (n=6) 4 (66.7) 3 (50.0)
 3 (n=8) 7 (87.5) 7 (87.5)
 4 (n=8) 1 (12.5) 4 (50.0)
p-value <0.001* 0.010*
Modified Hardy classification
 0
  A (n=41) 32 (78.0) 34 (82.9)
 1
  A (n=14) 12 (85.7) 12 (85.7)
 2
  E (n=4) 3 (75.0) 3 (75.0)
  A (n=5) 5 (100.0) 5 (100.0)
 3
  E (n=5) 2 (40.0) 2 (40.0)
  A (n=1) 1 (100.0) 1 (100.0)
  B (n=2) 2 (100.0) 2 (100.0)
 4
  E (n=1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  A (n=1) 1 (100.0) 1 (100.0)
  D (n=1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  E (n=3) 1 (33.3) 3 (100.0)
p-value 0.10 0.06
Pathology result
 Corticotropinoma (+) (n=71) 58 (81.7) 60 (84.5)
 Corticotropinoma (-) (n=25) 16 (64.0) 19 (76.0)
p-value 0.07 0.30

Values are presented as number (%). Invasion : 0, sella normal; 1, sella focally expanded and tumor ≤10 mm; 2, sella enlarged and tumor ≥10 mm; 3, localized perforation of the sellar floor; 4, diffuse destruction of the sellar floor. Suprasellar extension : A, no suprasellar extension; B, anterior recesses of the third ventricle obliterated; D, intracranial (intradural) with anterior, middle, or middle fossa; E, into/beneath the cavernous sinus (extradural).

* Statistically significant p-value

Download Table

Remission rates based on Knosp and Hardy classifications are presented in Table 2, respectively. The medium-term remission rates in Knosp group 4 were significantly lower than the rates in the other groups (Knosp 0 vs. 4, p<0.001; Knosp 1 vs. 4, p<0.001; Knosp 2 vs. 4, p=0.04; and Knosp 3 vs. 4, p=0.003). Additionally, the medium-term remission rate of tumors in Knosp group 2 was lower than that in Knosp group 1 (p=0.04). However, remission rates did not differ significantly among the other groups. Comparing invasive (Knosp 3 and 4) and noninvasive (Knosp 0, 1, and 2) tumors, remission rates within 3-6 months were 50% and 83% in the invasive and noninvasive groups, respectively. We further stratified cases with tumor size ≥20 mm (n=11) using Knosp classification; one case (9%) was Knosp 0, one case (9%) was Knosp 1, two cases (18%) were Knosp 3, and seven cases (64%) were Knosp 4 tumors. For ≥20 mm, all cases with Knosp 0, 1, and 3 tumors achieved remission within 3-6 months postoperatively, while none of the cases with Knosp 4 tumors had remission (p=0.01). All the cases with Knosp 0, 1, and 3 tumors sustained remission, and three cases with Knosp 4 tumor later achieved long-term remission (p=0.3). Of the cases that achieved long-term remission, two underwent STRS, and one had medical therapy with additional STRS.
Of the 96 tissue specimens obtained during ETSS, 71 (74%) stained positive for ACTH and were histologically identified as corticotropic adenomas, while 25 (26%) were negative. Remission rates based on the pathology results are compared in Table 2. Of the lesions with conclusive findings on MRI (≥6 mm lesions), 89% (n=49) were pathologically confirmed as corticotropinomas, whereas 54% (n=22) of those with inconclusive MRI f indings were pathologically conf irmed (p<0.001). Among the lesions that showed negative results for both conclusive MRI findings (≤5 mm) and pathologic confirmation (negative for a corticotropinoma) (n=19), 12 (63%) showed remission at 3-6 months and 14 (74%) showed remission during long-term follow-up.
During the exploration of the cavernous sinus in one patient (1%), postoperative lateral gaze paralysis of the eye developed due to right abducens nerve palsy. The patient was treated with anti-inflammatory doses of steroids, and the symptom completely resolved within 1 month. In three other patients (3%), severe epistaxis was observed in the postoperative period, 1 to 3 weeks after surgery. Nasal packing was applied for 3 days. Additionally, three patients (3%) experienced postoperative rhinorrhea. To address this issue, a reconstruction of the skull base was performed using fat tissue harvested from the leg, fascia lata graft, and tissue adhesive material. These patients were monitored with a lumbar drain for 1 week. Among the patients who developed rhinorrhea, one patient also developed meningitis and received intravenous antibiotic therapy for about 3 weeks and, the situation compeletly resolved during follow-up. The postoperative complications are summarized in Table 3. Comparison of various characteristics of the cases with and without medium and long-term remission are presented in Table 3, respectively.

Table 3.

Comparison of cases with and without remission, postoperative complications

3−6-month remission


Long-term remission


Number of cases (n=96)
Remission (+) (n=74) Remission (-) (n=22) p-value Remission (+) (n=79) Remission (-) (n=17) p-value
Operation 0.500 0.08
 First time 62 (83.8) 17 (77.3) 66 (83.5) 13 (76.5)
 Re-operation 12 (16.2) 5 (22.7) 13 (16.5) 4 (23.5)
Tumor characteristics 0.003* 0.20
 MST
  Grade 1 31 (42.0) 10 (45.0) 33 (41.8) 8 (47.1)
  Grade 2 22 (30.0) 2 (9.0) 22 (27.8) 2 (11.8)
  Grade 3 17 (23.0) 3 (14.0) 17 (21.5) 3 (17.6)
  Grade 4 4 (5.0) 7 (32.0) 7 (8.9) 4 (23.5)
 Knosp classification <0.001* 0.01*
  0 41 (56.0) 11 (50.0) 44 (55.5) 9 (53.0)
  1 21 (28.0) 1 (4.5) 21 (26.5) 2 (12.0)
  2 4 (5.0) 2 (9.0) 3 (4.0) 1 (6.0)
  3 7 (10.0) 1 (4.5) 7 (9.0) 1 (6.0)
  4 1 (1.0) 7 (32.0) 4 (5.0) 4 (23.0)
 Hardy classification 0.09 0.06
  0A 32 (43.2) 9 (41.0) 34 (43.0) 7 (41.0)
  1A 12 (16.2) 2 (9.0) 12 (15.0) 2 (12.0)
  1E 3 (4.0) 1 (4.5) 3 (4.0) 1 (6.0)
  2A 5 (6.7) 0 (0.0) 5 (6.0) 0 (0.0)
  2E 2 (2.7) 3 (14.0) 2 (3.0) 3 (17.0)
  3A 1 (1.4) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.0) 0 (0.0)
  3B 2 (2.7) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.0) 0 (0.0)
  3E 0 (0.0) 1 (4.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (6.0)
  4A 1 (1.4) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.0) 0 (0.0)
  4D 0 (0.0) 1 (4.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (6.0)
  4E 1 (1.4) 2 (9.0) 3 (4.0) 0 (0.0)
  NA 15 (20.3) 3 (13.5) 16 (20.0) 2 (12.0)
Postoperative
 Complication 0.900 0.30
  (+) 10 (13.5) 3 (13.6) 12 (15.2) 1 (5.9)
  (-) 64 (86.5) 19 (86.4) 67 (84.8) 16 (94.1)
 Pathologic diagnosis 0.070 0.30
  Corticotropinoma 58 (78.4) 13 (59.1) 60 (75.9) 11 (64.7)
  Negative 16 (21.6) 9 (40.9) 19 (24.1) 6 (35.3)
 Remission during long-term F/U <0.001*
  (+) 72 (97.3) 7 (31.8)
  (-) 2 (2.7) 15 (68.2)
 Residual tumor 0.001*
  (+) 3 (3.8) 5 (29.4)
  (-) 76 (96.2) 12 (70.6)
 Remission during long-term F/U <0.001*
  (+) 72 (91.1) 2 (11.8)
  (-) 7 (8.9) 15 (88.2)
Postoperative complication
 DI-temporary 4 (4.2)
 DI-permanent 4 (4.2)
 Meningitis 1 (1.0)
 CSF leak 3 (3.1)
 Epistaxis 3 (3.1)
 Cranial nerve palsy, transient 1 (1.0)
Hypopituitarism 4 (4.2)
 Hypocortisolism 2 (2.1)
 Hypothyroidisim 2 (2.1)

Values are presented as number (%). *Statistically significant p-values. MST : maximum size of tumor, NA : not available, F/U : follow up, DI : diabetes insipidus, CSF : cerebrospinal fluid

Download Table

Go to : Goto

DISCUSSION

This study reported an overall postoperative 3-6 month remission rate of 77% and a long-term remission rate of 82% after 3 years of follow-up. The initial and long-term remission rates after first operations were 78% and 82%, respectively, with a recurrence rate of 2.5% over a follow-up period of 3-3.5 years. Additionally, our findings revealed that tumor size >2 cm and extended tumor invasion of the cavernous sinus (Knosp 4) might be associated with lower postoperative remission rates. Patients who showed remission within 3-6 months showed higher rates of long-term remission than those in patients without initial remission.
Pituitary surgery is the first-line treatment modality for CD. ETSS is a safe and less invasive method for treating pituitary adenomas; therefore, it has been increasingly preferred in CD [5,15]. However, the postsurgical outcomes in patients with CD have shown variable remission and recurrence rates [2,4,9,16,17,21,30]. These discrepancies may be attributable to differences in population and number of cases involved in the studies, tumor characteristics, criteria for remission and recurrence used by the centers, laboratory parameters, time of evaluation and followup durations, surgical and imaging techniques used by different centers, and neurosurgical expertise.
In this study, we present the medium- and long-term postoperative results of 96 ETSS procedures performed in 87 patients. The medium-term results (obtained 3-6 months postoperation) were preferred to immediate results since a subset of cases may show delayed remission, and immediate postoperative results could be misleading in almost 6% of cases [37]. The overall medium-term remission rate was 77%, consistent with the results published by Serban et al. [34], who reported an overall remission rate of 77% 2 months postoperation. A larger series of 1106 cases reported an immediate remission rate of 72.5% within 7 days postoperation; however, this rate decreased to 67% after delayed remission rates and recurrences 56 months postoperation were considered [12]. The long-term remission rate obtained over a median period of 3 years was 82% in our series. The increased long-term remission rate was attributed to reoperations, additional medical therapies, and the use of STRS in those who did not show remission initially.
Of the 96 procedures, 79 were performed for the first time. The medium-term remission rate after first operations was 78%. Recent studies have reported remission rates of 74-82% after first operations [12,34]. The recurrence rates reported previously varied between 3% and 66% [5,12,34]. However, the duration of follow-up differed among the studies. Dai et al. [12] and Brady et al. [5] reported recurrence rates of 12% and 3%, respectively, after a follow-up period of 2 years. In contrast, Serban et al. [34] reported a recurrence rate of 17% after a longer followup duration of 6 years. In this series, after a median follow-up period of 3 years, the overall recurrence rate was 2.5%. Residual tumors were observed in five cases (6%), and the reoperation rate after the first operation was 13%. Including the eight patients admitted for reoperation after having undergone their first surgery in another center, 17 cases involved reoperations in our center. Of these cases, 71% (n=12) showed remission between 3-6 months postoperation, while none showed recurrence; thus, the long-term remission rate was 77%. Residual tumors were detected in three cases (18%), and the disease persisted in four (24%) of these 17 reoperated cases. Previous studies have reported remission rates of 22-75% after repeated surgery in CD [5,12,34,38]. Although the success rates after reoperations were lower than those in first-time operations in some studies [38], the remission rates after the first and reoperations did not differ significantly in our study.
Tumor size has been reported to contribute to the success of transsphenoidal surgery [12,34], with microadenomas showing a higher success rate after surgery [5,12,34]. Our remission rates for micro- and macroadenomas were similar to those reported by Dai et al. [12] : 81% for adenomas <10 mm and 68% for adenomas ≥10 mm. However, the statistical significance of our study differed from that in the series presented by Dai et al. [12] (p=0.2 vs. p=0.002). This may be due to the large difference in the number of cases included in the two studies and the differences in size scales for tumors ≥10 mm. In our series, when the tumors were stratified further by the tumor size, the medium-term remission rate further decreased to 36% for tumors ≥20 mm in size, although the remission rates for other groups <20 mm were all above 75% (p=0.003). Sharifi et al. [35] classified pituitary MRI scans in CD showing a tumor size <6 mm as “inconclusive” because incidentalomas are frequent among tumors in this size range, and this size is not indicative of CD. Previously published series reported that the rate of inconclusive MRI scans in CD was 36-64%, and the remission rates varied between 50% and 71% for those with an inconclusive MRI scan [10,24,27,32,33]. In our series, 54% of the preoperative MRI scans were inconclusive. In the series presented by Sharifi et al. [35] and some other series [8,12,32,36], no significant difference was observed between the remission rates of CD cases with and without a conclusive MRI.This finding is controversial since other studies showed decreased remission rates with preoperative inconclusive MRIs [13,40]. Similar to the results reported by Sharifi et al. [35], we did not find a statistically significant difference between the remission rates of tumors <6 mm and those between 6-20 mm. However, a significant difference was observed between tumors <6 mm and those ≥20 mm. Residual tumors were more frequent after operating tumors >20 mm compared to those <20 mm, but the number of reoperations did not differ among the groups. Additionally, tumors >20 mm were primarily Knosp 4 (64%), probably contributing to lower remission rates in this group. Interestingly, two Knosp 3 cases had postoperative remission within 3-6 months without additional intervention. In these two cases, the surgical team explored the cavernous sinus and could resect the tumor. However, complete excision was not feasible with Knosp 4 tumors, where there is a complete encasement of the intracavernous internal carotid artery. Thus, a tumor size of 20 mm may be supportive data in predicting non-remission in the presence of complete cavernous sinus infiltration.
Cavernous sinus invasion, determined by the Knosp classification, and sellar invasion and/or suprasellar extension, determined by the Hardy-Wilson classification, indicate the radiologic status of local invasion in cases of pituitary tumors [20,22,39]. Invasion to surrounding structures and tissues may be a limiting factor for postoperative remission of pituitary tumors. In the series presented by Dai et al. [12], remission rates of corticotropinomas with Knosp grade 4 (definitive cavernous sinus invasion) dropped to 53% from a remission rate of 77% for corticotropinomas with less likely or no cavernous sinus invasion (p<0.001). Similarly, our results showed that both medium- and long-term remission rates for Knosp grade 4 tumors decreased to 13% and 50%, respectively, and were lower than the remission rates in other grades (p<0.001 and p=0.01, respectively). While remission rates in Knosp group 3 were not inferior to noninvasive tumors, remission rates in Knosp group 4 were lower than all the other groups. In this regard, the extent of invasion may be more determinative. In contrast, in our series, the modified Hardy classification did not show a significant effect on postoperative remission rates in medium- and long-term follow-up assessments. Araujo-Castro et al. [3] had previously shown that for pituitary adenomas, the Hardy-Wilson classification lacked utility in predicting postoperative remission compared to the Knosp classification. The difference in the utility of these classifications for predicting postoperative remission may be due to differences in accessing tissues during surgery.
In the present series, 74% (n=71) of tissues were histologically proven to be corticotropinomas, while 26% (n=25) did not show histologic confirmation. Medium- and long-term remission rates did not differ between histologically proven and unproven CD cases (medium-term remission rates, 82% vs. 64%, p=0.07; long-term remission rates, 85% vs. 76%, p=0.3). A conclusive finding of an adenoma on MRI increased the rate of histologic proof of corticotropinoma in our series, implying that adenomas showing a ≥6-mm lesion on MRI more frequently stained positive for ACTH. In previous studies 12-53% of CD did not have postoperative pathologic identification and the rate increased in those with a preoperative inconclusive MRI [25,31,38]. However, this did not have a significant influence on our remission rates. The remission rates did not decrease even for CD cases that were not conclusively detected on MRI and could not be histologically proven. On the other hand, in previous studies, ACTH positivity was higher, and the lack of proof for a corticotropinoma decreased the remission rates [1,12,31,32,34]. The higher remission rates despite reduced localization with MRI and/or lower rates of histologic confirmation in our series may be explained by the successful preoperative IPSS lateralization, surgical exploration, and hemi-hypophysectomy procedure. Furthermore, tumor tissues might have been aspirated along with blood and other materials through the suction tube, potentially resulting in less histological confirmation despite postoperative remission of CD.
Additionally, tumor tissues might have been aspirated along with blood and other materials through the suction tube, potentially resulting in less histological confirmation despite postoperative remission of CD.
The total rate of complications in this series was 20%, and the most frequent complication was diabetes insipidus (DI; 8%, both permanent and temporary). The incidence of hypopituitarism was relatively lower (4%), mainly involving hypocortisolism and hypothyroidism. Recent studies have shown postoperative DI rates of 25-66% and hypothyroidism rates of 11-23% [5,34]. Although our neurosurgical team was experienced in conducting pituitary surgeries, other factors may have resulted in these differences. Since not all the cases were postoperatively followed in our center, with some patients lost to follow-up, there may be missing data.
Comparing cases with and without remission in the medium term, cases of remission frequently involved adenomas >20 mm and less cavernous sinus invasion. Additionally, cases that achieved medium-term remission showed long-term remission more frequently. In the long term, those showing remission had less cavernous sinus invasion and residual tumors compared to those without remission. Therefore, we may conclude that a tumor size of 20 mm may predict medium-term remission, while the absence of/less cavernous sinus invasion, early remission, and absence of residual tumor may predict long-term remission.
This study had limitations. First, the retrospective nature of the study and the limited number of cases, which was inevitable due to the low incidence of CD, may have distorted our results. Although the same neurosurgical team operated on all patients, they were followed up pre and postoperatively at different endocrinology centers, causing difficulty in obtaining the full postoperative data of certain cases. Lastly, some patients recently underwent ETSS; thus, they had a shorter follow-up period. However, we intend to present the longer-term outcomes of all patients in a separate study.
Although ETSS is the first-line treatment for CD, previous studies on the use of ETSS for CD have reported a wide range of remission and recurrence rates, which can be primarily attributed to differences in the surgical experience levels among centers. This trend highlights the need for additional data from experienced centers to resolve the discrepancies in the existing data. Therefore, we present medium- and long-term follow-up data from 96 operations for CD conducted in a center with a high level of experience for ETSS. We believe our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because the findings reconfirm the usefulness of ETSS for the treatment of CD and highlight the importance of the size of the adenoma and presence/absence of cavernous sinus invasion on preoperative MRI in predicting long-term remission postoperatively.
Go to : Goto

CONCLUSION

ETSS is a safe and effective method for the treatment of CD. Some characteristics of adenomas, such as size, cavernous sinus invasion, and postoperative residue, may predict long-term remission. A tumor size of 2 cm may be a supporting criterion for predicting remission status in the presence of complete cavernous sinus infiltration. Further studies with larger patient populations are necessary to support this finding.
Go to : Goto

Notes

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this study exist.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Author contributions

Conceptualization : BE, MB, EH; Data curation : EA, OH, DT, MM; Formal analysis : LŞP, DAB, DT, İÇ; Funding acquisition : OT, ÖG, DAB; Methodology : LŞP, İÇ, MM, ÖG; Project administration : BE, SÇ, EH; Visualization : EA, OT, OH; Writing – original draft : BE, MB, SÇ; Writing – review & editing : BE, EH

Data sharing

None

Preprint

None

Go to : Goto

Acknowledgements

This manuscript was edited by a certified English Proofreading Service (Editage).
Go to : Goto

References

1. Acebes JJ, Martino J, Masuet C, Montanya E, Soler J : Early post-operative ACTH and cortisol as predictors of remission in Cushing’s disease. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149 : 471-477; discussion 477-479, 2007
crossref pmid pdf
2. Aranda G, Enseñat J, Mora M, Puig-Domingo M, Martínez de Osaba MJ, Casals G, et al : Long-term remission and recurrence rate in a cohort of Cushing’s disease: the need for long-term follow-up. Pituitary 18 : 142-149, 2015
crossref pmid pdf
3. Araujo-Castro M, Acitores Cancela A, Vior C, Pascual-Corrales E, Rodríguez Berrocal V : Radiological Knosp, revised-Knosp, and Hardy-Wilson classifications for the prediction of surgical outcomes in the endoscopic endonasal surgery of pituitary adenomas: study of 228 cases. Front Oncol 11 : 807040, 2022
crossref pmid pmc
4. Biller BM, Grossman AB, Stewart PM, Melmed S, Bertagna X, Bertherat J, et al : Treatment of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93 : 2454-2462, 2008
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Brady Z, Garrahy A, Carthy C, O’Reilly MW, Thompson CJ, Sherlock M, et al : Outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease. BMC Endocr Disord 21 : 36, 2021
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Brichard C, Costa E, Fomekong E, Maiter D, Raftopoulos C : Outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for cushing disease: a single-center experience over 20 years. World Neurosurg 119 : e106-e117, 2018
crossref pmid
7. Broersen LHA, Biermasz NR, van Furth WR, de Vries F, Verstegen MJT, Dekkers OM, et al : Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary 21 : 524-534, 2018
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Cebula H, Baussart B, Villa C, Assié G, Boulin A, Foubert L, et al : Efficacy of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease in 230 patients with positive and negative MRI. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 159 : 1227-1236, 2017
crossref pmid pdf
9. Chandler WF, Barkan AL, Hollon T, Sakharova A, Sack J, Brahma B, et al : Outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for cushing disease: a singlecenter experience over 32 years. Neurosurgery 78 : 216-223, 2016
pmid
10. Ciric I, Zhao JC, Du H, Findling JW, Molitch ME, Weiss RE, et al : Transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing disease: experience with 136 patients. Neurosurgery 70 : 70-80; discussion 80-81, 2012
pmid
11. Clayton RN, Raskauskiene D, Reulen RC, Jones PW : Mortality and morbidity in Cushing’s disease over 50 years in Stoke-on-Trent, UK: audit and meta-analysis of literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96 : 632-642, 2011
crossref pmid pdf
12. Dai C, Feng M, Sun B, Bao X, Yao Y, Deng K, et al : Surgical outcome of transsphenoidal surgery in Cushing’s disease: a case series of 1106 patients from a single center over 30 years. Endocrine 75 : 219-227, 2022
crossref pmid pdf
13. Doglietto F, Maira G : Cushing disease and negative magnetic resonance imaging finding: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. World Neurosurg 77 : 445-447, 2012
crossref pmid
14. Erkan B, Barut O, Akbas A, Akpinar E, Akdeniz YS, Tanriverdi O, et al : Results of endoscopic surgery in patients with pituitary adenomas : association of tumor classification grades with resection, remission, and complication rates. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 64 : 608-618, 2021
crossref pmid pmc pdf
15. Fang J, Xie S, Li N, Jiang Z : Postoperative complications of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a meta-analysis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 28 : 554-559, 2018
crossref pmid
16. Feng M, Liu Z, Liu X, Bao X, Yao Y, Deng K, et al : Diagnosis and outcomes of 341 patients with Cushing’s disease following transsphenoid surgery: a single-center experience. World Neurosurg 109 : e75-e80, 2018
crossref pmid
17. Fleseriu M, Hamrahian AH, Hoffman AR, Kelly DF, Katznelson L; AACE Neuroendocrine, Pituitary Scientific Committee : American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Disease state clinical review: diagnosis of recurrence in Cushing disease. Endocr Pract 22 : 1436-1448, 2016
crossref pmid
18. Hakami OA, Ahmed S, Karavitaki N : Epidemiology and mortality of Cushing’s syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 35 : 101521, 2021
crossref pmid
19. Hameed N, Yedinak CG, Brzana J, Gultekin SH, Coppa ND, Dogan A, et al : Remission rate after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pathologically confirmed Cushing’s disease, the role of cortisol, ACTH assessment and immediate reoperation: a large single center experience. Pituitary 16 : 452-458, 2013
crossref pmid pdf
20. Hardy J, Vezina JL : Transsphenoidal neurosurgery of intracranial neoplasm. Adv Neurol 15 : 261-273, 1976
pmid
21. Juszczak A, Ertorer ME, Grossman A : The therapy of Cushing’s disease in adults and children: an update. Horm Metab Res 45 : 109-117, 2013
crossref pmid
22. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C : Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33 : 610-617; discussion 617-618, 1993
crossref pmid
23. Lambert JK, Goldberg L, Fayngold S, Kostadinov J, Post KD, Geer EB : Predictors of mortality and long-term outcomes in treated Cushing’s disease: a study of 346 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98 : 1022-1030, 2013
crossref pmid pmc
24. Lüdecke DK, Flitsch J, Knappe UJ, Saeger W : Cushing’s disease: a surgical view. J Neurooncol 54 : 151-166, 2001
pmid
25. Mamelak AN, Dowd CF, Tyrrell JB, McDonald JF, Wilson CB : Venous angiography is needed to interpret inferior petrosal sinus and cavernous sinus sampling data for lateralizing adrenocorticotropin-secreting adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81 : 475-481, 1996
crossref pmid
26. McCance DR, McIlrath E, McNeill A, Gordon DS, Hadden DR, Kennedy L, et al : Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling as a routine procedure in ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 30 : 157-166, 1989
crossref pmid
27. Netea-Maier RT, van Lindert EJ, den Heijer M, van der Eerden A, Pieters GF, Sweep CG, et al : Transsphenoidal pituitary surgery via the endoscopic technique: results in 35 consecutive patients with Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol 154 : 675-684, 2006
crossref pmid
28. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, et al : The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93 : 1526-1540, 2008
crossref pmid pmc
29. Oldfield EH, Doppman JL, Nieman LK, Chrousos GP, Miller DL, Katz DA, et al : Petrosal sinus sampling with and without corticotropin-releasing hormone for the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 325 : 897-905, 1991
crossref pmid
30. Petersenn S, Beckers A, Ferone D, van der Lely A, Bollerslev J, Boscaro M, et al : Therapy of endocrine disease: outcomes in patients with Cushing’s disease undergoing transsphenoidal surgery: systematic review assessing criteria used to define remission and recurrence. Eur J Endocrinol 172 : R227-R239, 2015
crossref pmid
31. Prevedello DM, Pouratian N, Sherman J, Jane JA Jr, Vance ML, Lopes MB, et al : Management of Cushing’s disease: outcome in patients with microadenoma detected on pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 109 : 751-759, 2008
crossref pmid
32. Salenave S, Gatta B, Pecheur S, San-Galli F, Visot A, Lasjaunias P, et al : Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging findings do not influence surgical outcome in adrenocorticotropin-secreting microadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89 : 3371-3376, 2004
crossref pmid
33. Semple PL, Laws ER Jr : Complications in a contemporary series of patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease. J Neurosurg 91 : 175-179, 1999
crossref
34. Serban AL, Del Sindaco G, Sala E, Carosi G, Indirli R, Rodari G, et al : Determinants of outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing disease in a single-centre series. J Endocrinol Invest 43 : 631-639, 2020
crossref pmid pdf
35. Sharifi G, Amin AA, Sabahi M, Echeverry NB, Dilmaghani NA, Mousavinejad SA, et al : MRI-negative Cushing’s disease: management strategy and outcomes in 15 cases utilizing a pure endoscopic endonasal approach. BMC Endocr Disord 22 : 154, 2022
crossref pmid pmc pdf
36. Sun Y, Sun Q, Fan C, Shen J, Zhao W, Guo Y, et al : Diagnosis and therapy for Cushing’s disease with negative dynamic MRI finding: a singlecentre experience. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 76 : 868-876, 2012
crossref pmid
37. Valassi E, Biller BM, Swearingen B, Pecori Giraldi F, Losa M, Mortini P, et al : Delayed remission after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95 : 601-610, 2010
crossref pmid pmc pdf
38. Valderrábano P, Aller J, García-Valdecasas L, García-Uría J, Martín L, Palacios N, et al : Results of repeated transsphenoidal surgery in Cushing’s disease. Long-term follow-up. Endocrinol Nutr 61 : 176-183, 2014
crossref pmid
39. Wilson CB : A decade of pituitary microsurgery. The Herbert Olivecrona lecture. J Neurosurg 61 : 814-833, 1984
pmid
40. Yamada S, Fukuhara N, Nishioka H, Takeshita A, Inoshita N, Ito J, et al : Surgical management and outcomes in patients with Cushing disease with negative pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. World Neurosurg 77 : 525-532, 2012
crossref pmid

Olfactory Neuroblastoma Causing Cushing’s Syndrome Due to the Ectopic Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Secretion

Abstract

Cushing’s syndrome is a constellation of features occurring due to high blood cortisol levels. We report a case of a 47-year-old male with a history of recurrent olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB). He presented with bilateral lower limb weakness and anosmia and was found to have Cushing’s syndrome due to high adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels from an ectopic source, ONB in this case. Serum cortisol and ACTH levels declined after tumor removal.

Introduction

Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), or esthesioneuroblastoma, is a rare malignancy arising from neuroepithelium in the upper nasal cavity. It represents approximately 2% of all nasal passage tumors, with an incidence of approximately 0.4 per 2.5 million individuals [1]. ONB shares similar histological features with small round blue cell neoplasms of the nose. Ectopic hormone secretion is a very rare feature associated with these tumors. Five-year overall survival is reported to be between 60% and 80% [2,3]. The age distribution is either in the fifth to sixth decade of life [4,5], or in the second and sixth decades [6].

Features of Cushing’s syndrome (moon face, buffalo hump, central obesity hypertension, fragile skin, easy bruising, fatigue, muscle weakness) are due to high blood cortisol levels [7]. It can be either primary (cortisol-secreting adrenal tumor), secondary (adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary tumor, also called Cushing disease), or ectopic ACTH secretion (from a non-pituitary source). All three types share similar features [8].

Ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS) is due to an extra pituitary tumor, producing ACTH. It accounts for 12-17% of Cushing’s syndrome cases [9]. Most cases of EAS-producing tumors are in the lungs, mediastinum, neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, and pheochromocytomas [9]. Ectopic ACTH secretion from an ONB is very rare. As of 2015, only 18 cases were reported in the literature [10]. Here, we report such a case.

Case Presentation

Our patient is a 47-year-old Bangladeshi male, with a history of recurrent ONB that was resected twice in the past (transsphenoidal resection in 2016 and 2019) with adjuvant radiotherapy, no chemotherapy was given. He also had diabetes mellitus type 1 (poorly controlled) and hypertension. He presented with bilateral lower limb weakness, anosmia, decreased oral intake, loss of taste for one week, and bilateral submandibular swelling that increased in size gradually over the past two years. There was no history of fever, cough, abdominal pain, or exposure to sick contacts. The patient reported past episodes of similar symptoms, but details are unclear. The patient’s family history is positive for diabetes mellitus type 1 in both parents. Lab tests in the emergency department showed hypokalemia and hyperglycemia as detailed in Table 1. He was admitted for further workup of the above complaints.

Test Patient Results Reference Range Unit Status
Hemoglobin 14.7 13-17 g/dL Normal
White blood cell (WBC) 17.9 4-10 10*9/L High
Neutrophils 15.89 2-7 10*9/L High
Lymphocytes 1.07 1-3 10*9/L Normal
Sodium 141 136-145 mmol/L Normal
Potassium 2.49 3.5-5.1 mmol/L Low (Panic)
Chloride 95 98-107 mmol/L Low
Glucose 6.52 4.11-5.89 mmol/L Elevated
C-reactive protein (CRP) 0.64 Less than 5 mg/L Normal
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 2 0-30 mm/h Normal
Creatinine 73 62-106 µmol/L Normal
Uric acid 197 202.3-416.5 µmol/L Normal
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 33.2 0-41 U/L Normal
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 18.6 0-40 U/L Normal
International Normalised Ratio (INR) 1.21 0.8-1.2 sec High
Prothrombin time (PT) 15.7 12.3-14.7 sec High
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 491 135-225 U/L High
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) 0.222 0.27-4.20 mIU/L Low
Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 106 ≤50 ng/L Elevated
Cortisol (after dexamethasone suppression) 1750 Morning hours (6-10 am): 172-497 nmol, Afternoon hours (4-8 pm): 74.1-286 nmol nmol/L Elevated (failure of suppression)
24-hour urine cortisol (after dexamethasone suppression) 5959.1 <120 nmol/24 hrs nmol/24hr Elevated (failure of suppression)
Table 1: Results of blood test at the time of hospitalization. Hypokalemia and high values of adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol were confirmed.

On examination, the patient’s vital signs were as follows: blood pressure was 154/77 mmHg, heart rate of 60 beats per minute, respiratory rate was 18 breaths per minute, oxygen saturation of 98% on room air, and a temperature of 36.7°C. The patient had a typical Cushingoid appearance with a moon face, buffalo hump, purple striae on the abdomen, central obesity, and hyperpigmentation of the skin. Submandibular lymph nodes were enlarged bilaterally. The examination of the submandibular lymph nodes showed a firm, fixed mass extending from the angle of the mandible to the submental space on the left side. Neurological examination showed weakness in both legs bilaterally (strength 3/5) and anosmia (checked by orthonasal smell test). The rest of the neurological exam was normal.

Laboratory findings revealed (in Table 1) a marked hypokalemia of 2.49 mmol/L and hyperglycemia of 6.52 mmol/L. The serum cortisol level was elevated at 1587 nmol/L. Serum ACTH levels were raised at 106 ng/L (normal value ≤50 ng/L). Moreover, the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test failed to lower the serum ACTH levels and serum and urine cortisol. Serum cortisol level after the suppression test was 1750 nmol/L, while 24-hour urine cortisol after the test was 5959.1 nmol/24hr. Serum ACTH levels after the test also remained high at 100mg/L. This indicated failure of ACTH suppression by high-dose dexamethasone, which points towards ectopic ACTH production. Other blood tests (complete blood count, liver function tests) were insignificant.

A computed tomography scan with contrast (CT scan) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with a special focus on the adrenals, was negative for any malignancy or masses. CT scan of the neck showed bilaterally enlarged submandibular lymph nodes and an enlarged right lobe of the thyroid with nodules. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the thyroid nodules revealed a benign nature. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed a contrast-enhancing soft tissue lesion (18x18x10mm) in the midline olfactory groove area with extension into the frontal dura and superior sagittal sinus, suggesting recurrence of the previous ONB. There was evidence of previous surgery also. The pituitary gland was normal (Figures 12).

A-brain-MRI-(T1-weighted;-without-contrast;-sagittal-plane)-shows-a-soft-tissue-lesion-located-in-the-midline-olfactory-groove-area.-Dural-surface-with-extension-into-anterior-frontal-dura.
Figure 1: A brain MRI (T1-weighted; without contrast; sagittal plane) shows a soft tissue lesion located in the midline olfactory groove area. Dural surface with extension into anterior frontal dura.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging

A-brain-MRI-(T2-weighted;-without-contrast;-axial-plane)-shows-a-soft-tissue-lesion-located-in-the-midline-olfactory-groove-area.
Figure 2: A brain MRI (T2-weighted; without contrast; axial plane) shows a soft tissue lesion located in the midline olfactory groove area.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging

Octreotide scintigraphy showed three focal abnormal uptakes in the submandibular cervical nodes. Additionally, there was a moderate abnormal uptake at the midline olfactory groove with bilateral extension (Figure 3).

Whole-body-octreotide-scan-(15-mCi-99mTc-Octreotide-IV)-demonstrates-three-focal-abnormal-uptakes:-the-largest-(5.2-x-2.4-cm)-in-the-left-submandibular-region,-and-two-smaller-ones-on-the-right,-suggestive-of-lymph-node-uptake.-Additional-abnormal-uptake-was-seen-along-the-midline-of-the-olfactory-groove-region-with-bilateral-extension.-No-other-significant-abnormal-uptake-was-identified.
Figure 3: Whole-body octreotide scan (15 mCi 99mTc-Octreotide IV) demonstrates three focal abnormal uptakes: the largest (5.2 x 2.4 cm) in the left submandibular region, and two smaller ones on the right, suggestive of lymph node uptake. Additional abnormal uptake was seen along the midline of the olfactory groove region with bilateral extension. No other significant abnormal uptake was identified.

On microscopic examination, an excisional biopsy after the transcranial resection surgery of the frontal skull base tumor showed nests and lobules of round to oval cells with clear cytoplasm, separated by vascular and hyalinized fibrous stroma (Figures 4A4B). Tumor cells show mild to moderate nuclear pleomorphism, and fine chromatin (Figure 4C). A fibrillary neural matrix is also present. Some mitotic figures can be seen. Immunohistochemical stains revealed positive staining for synaptophysin (Figure 4D) and chromogranin (Figure 4E). Stains for CK (AE1/AE3), CD45, Desmin, and Myogenin are negative. Immunostaining for ACTH was focally positive (Figure 4F), while the specimen of the cervical lymph nodes showed the same staining, indicating metastases. The cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic features observed are consistent with a Hyams grade II ONB, with ectopic ACTH production.

Histopathological-and-immunohistochemical-findings-of-olfactory-neuroblastoma.
Figure 4: Histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of olfactory neuroblastoma.

A (100x magnification) and B (200x magnification) – hematoxylin and eosin (H-E) staining shows cellular nests of round blue cells separated by hyalinized stroma. C (400x magnification) – nuclei show mild to moderate pleomorphism with fine chromatin. D (100x magnification) – an immunohistochemical stain for synaptophysin shows diffuse, strong cytoplasmic positivity within tumor cells. E (200x magnification) – tumor cells are positive for chromogranin. F (400x magnification) – ACTH cytoplasmic expression in tumor cells.

ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone

For his resistant hypokalemia, he had to be given intravenous (IV) and oral potassium chloride (KCL) repeatedly. The patient underwent transcranial resection of the frontal skull base tumor. The patient received cefazolin for seven days, and hydrocortisone for four days. After transcranial resection, his cortisol level decreased to 700 nmol/L. Furthermore, ACTH dropped, and serum potassium also normalized. Subsequently, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) for meticulous monitoring and continued care. In the ICU, the patient developed one episode of a generalized tonic-clonic seizure, which aborted spontaneously, and the patient received phenytoin and levetiracetam to prevent other episodes. A right-sided internal jugular vein and left transverse sinus thrombosis were also developed and treated with enoxaparin sodium. Following surgery, his low potassium levels improved, resulting in an improvement in his limb weakness. His other symptoms also gradually improved after surgery. Three weeks following the primary tumor resection, he underwent bilateral neck dissection with right hemithyroidectomy, for removal of the metastases. The patient opted out of chemotherapy and planned for an international transfer to his home country for further management. Other treatments that he received during hospitalization were ceftriaxone, azithromycin, and Augmentin®. Insulin was used to manage his diabetes, perindopril to regulate his blood pressure, and spironolactone to increase potassium retention. Omeprazole was administered to prevent GI bleeding and heartburn/gastroesophageal reflux disease relief after discharge.

Discussion

ONB was first described in 1924, and it is a rare neuroectodermal tumor that accounts for 2% of tumors affecting the nasal cavity [11]. Even though ONB has a good survival rate, long-term follow-up is necessary due to the disease’s high recurrence rate [2]. ONB recurrence has been approximated to range between 30% and 60% after successful treatment of the primary tumor [12]. Recurrent disease is usually locoregional and tends to have a long interval to relapse with a mean of six years [12]. The first reported case of ectopic ACTH syndrome caused by ONB was in 1987 by M Reznik et al., who reported a 48-year-old woman with ONB who developed a Cushing-like syndrome 28 months before her death [13].

The occurrence of Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic ACTH can occur either in the initial tumor or even years later during its course or after recurrence [3,6,9,14]. Similar to the case of Abe et al. [3], our patient also presented with muscle weakness due to hypokalemia, which is a feature of Cushing’s syndrome. Hypokalemia is present at diagnosis in 64% to 86% of cases of EAS and is resistant to treatment [9,14], as seen in our case. In our patient, the exact time of development of Cushing’s syndrome could not be ascertained due to the non-availability of previous records. However, according to the patient, he started developing abdominal obesity, pigmentation, and buffalo hump in 2021 about two years after his second surgery for ONB.

The distinction between pituitary ACTH and ectopic ACTH involves utilizing CT/MRI of the pituitary, corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation test with petrosal sinus blood sampling, high dose dexamethasone suppression test, and checking serum K+ (more commonly low in ectopic ACTH) [2,15,16]. In our case, a CRH stimulation test was not available but CT/MRI brain, dexamethasone test, low serum potassium, plus the postoperative fall in cortisol levels, all pointed towards an ectopic ACTH source.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this case highlights the rare association between ONB and ectopic ACTH syndrome, which developed after tumor recurrence. The patient’s unique presentation of bilateral lower limb weakness and hypokalemia can cause diagnostic challenges, emphasizing the need for comprehensive diagnostic measures. Surgical intervention proved crucial, with postoperative cortisol values becoming normal, highlighting the efficacy of this approach. The occurrence of ectopic ACTH production in ONB patients, although very rare, is emphasized, so that healthcare professionals who deal with these tumors are aware of this complication. This report contributes valuable insights shedding light on the unique ONB manifestation causing ectopic ACTH syndrome. The ongoing monitoring of the patient’s clinical features will further enrich the understanding of the course of this uncommon phenomenon in the medical literature.

References

  1. Thompson LD: Olfactory neuroblastoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2009, 3:252-9. 10.1007/s12105-009-0125-2
  2. Abdelmeguid AS: Olfactory neuroblastoma. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018, 20:7. 10.1007/s11912-018-0661-6
  3. Abe H, Suwanai H, Kambara N, et al.: A rare case of ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome with recurrent olfactory neuroblastoma. Intern Med. 2021, 60:105-9. 10.2169/internalmedicine.2897-19
  4. Yin Z, Wang Y, Wu Y, et al.: Age distribution and age-related outcomes of olfactory neuroblastoma: a population-based analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018, 10:1359-64. 10.2147/CMAR.S151945
  5. Platek ME, Merzianu M, Mashtare TL, Popat SR, Rigual NR, Warren GW, Singh AK: Improved survival following surgery and radiation therapy for olfactory neuroblastoma: analysis of the SEER database. Radiat Oncol. 2011, 6:41. 10.1186/1748-717X-6-41
  6. Elkon D, Hightower SI, Lim ML, Cantrell RW, Constable WC: Esthesioneuroblastoma. Cancer. 1979, 44:3-1087. 10.1002/1097-0142(197909)44:3<1087::aid-cncr2820440343>3.0.co;2-a
  7. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, Montori VM: The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 93:1526-40. 10.1210/jc.2008-0125
  8. Chabre O: Cushing syndrome: physiopathology, etiology and principles of therapy [Article in French]. Presse Med. 2014, 43:376-92. 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.02.001
  9. Isidori AM, Lenzi A: Ectopic ACTH syndrome. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2007, 51:1217-25. 10.1590/s0004-27302007000800007
  10. Kunc M, Gabrych A, Czapiewski P, Sworczak K: Paraneoplastic syndromes in olfactory neuroblastoma. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2015, 19:6-16. 10.5114/wo.2015.46283
  11. Finlay JB, Abi Hachem R, Jang DW, Osazuwa-Peters N, Goldstein BJ: Deconstructing olfactory epithelium developmental pathways in olfactory neuroblastoma. Cancer Res Commun. 2023, 3:980-90. 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0013
  12. Ni G, Pinheiro-Neto CD, Iyoha E, et al.: Recurrent esthesioneuroblastoma: long-term outcomes of salvage therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2023, 15:1506. 10.3390/cancers15051506
  13. Reznik M, Melon J, Lambricht M, Kaschten B, Beckers A: Neuroendocrine tumor of the nasal cavity (esthesioneuroblastoma). Apropos of a case with paraneoplastic Cushing’s syndrome [Article in French]. Ann Pathol. 1987, 7:137-42.
  14. Kadoya M, Kurajoh M, Miyoshi A, et al.: Ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome associated with olfactory neuroblastoma: acquirement of adrenocorticotropic hormone expression during disease course as shown by serial immunohistochemistry examinations. J Int Med Res. 2018, 46:4760-8. 10.1177/0300060517754026
  15. Clotman K, Twickler MTB, Dirinck E, et al.: An endocrine picture in disguise: a progressive olfactory neuroblastoma complicated with ectopic Cushing syndrome. AACE Clin Case Rep. 2017, 3:278-83. 10.4158/EP161729.CR
  16. Chung YS, Na M, Ku CR, Kim SH, Kim EH: Adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting esthesioneuroblastoma with ectopic Cushing’s syndrome. Yonsei Med J. 2020, 61:257-61. 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.3.257

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/226080-olfactory-neuroblastoma-causing-cushings-syndrome-due-to-the-ectopic-adrenocorticotropic-hormone-acth-secretion-a-case-report?score_article=true#!/

Fulminant Ectopic Cushing’s Syndrome Caused by Metastatic Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Tumour

Cushing’s syndrome (CS) secondary to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) producing tumours is a severe condition with a challenging diagnosis. Ectopic ACTH-secretion often involves neuroendocrine tumours (NET) in the respiratory tract.

ACTH-secreting small intestine neuro-endocrine tumours (siNET) are extremely rare entities barely reported in literature. This review is illustrated by the case of a 75-year old woman with fulminant ectopic CS caused by a ACTH-secreting metastatic siNET. Severe hypokalemia, fluid retention and refractory hypertension were the presenting symptoms. Basal and dynamic laboratory studies were diagnostic for ACTH-dependent CS.

Extensive imaging studies of the pituitary and thorax-abdomen areas were normal, while [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT revealed increased small intestine uptake in the left iliac fossa. The hypercortisolism was well controlled with somatostatin analogues, after which a debulking resection of the tumour was performed. Pathological investigation confirmed a well-differentiated NET with sporadic ACTH immunostaining and post-operative treatment with somatostatin analogues was continued with favourable disease control.
© Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica.

ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS

Different Patient Versus Provider Perspectives on Living with Cushing’s Disease

Abstract

Context

Patients with Cushing’s disease (CD) face challenges living with and receiving appropriate care for this rare, chronic condition. Even with successful treatment, many patients experience ongoing symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL). Different perspectives and expectations between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) may also impair well-being.

Objective

To examine differences in perspectives on living with CD between patients and HCPs, and to compare care goals and unmet needs.

Design

Memorial Sloan Kettering Pituitary Center established an annual pituitary symposium for pituitary patients and HCPs. Through anonymous pre-program surveys distributed at the 2020 and 2022 symposia, patients and HCPs answered questions related to their own sense, or perception of their patients’ sense, of hope, choice, and loneliness in the context of living with CD.

Participants

From 655 participants over two educational events, 46 patients with CD and 116 HCPs were included. Median age of both groups was 51 years. 78.3% of the patients were female vs. 53.0% of the HCPs.

Results

More patients than HCPs reported they had no choices in their treatment (21.7% vs. 0.9%, P < 0.001). More patients reported feeling alone living with CD than HCPs’ perception of such (60.9% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.08). The most common personal care goal concern for patients was ‘QoL/mental health,’ vs. ‘medical therapies/tumor control’ for HCPs. The most common CD unmet need reported by patients was ‘education/awareness’ vs. ‘medical therapies/tumor control’ for HCPs.

Conclusions

CD patients experience long term symptoms and impaired QoL which may in part be due to a perception of lack of effective treatment options and little hope for improvement. Communicating experiences and care goals may improve long term outcomes for CD patients.

Introduction

Patients with rare diseases face challenges receiving appropriate care. Cushing’s disease (CD), a condition associated with excess endogenous glucocorticoids due to an ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor, is a rare disease, occurring in 0.7 to 2.4 per million per year [1]. Patients with CD are at high risk for metabolic, cardiovascular, and psychiatric disease, in addition to long-term symptom burden and impaired quality of life (QoL), despite adequate treatment [1,2,3].

A critical aspect of effective patient care is communication and mutual understanding between healthcare provider (HCP) and patient. Patients with pituitary tumors experience significant anxiety associated with their diagnosis, in large part due to difficulties interacting with healthcare systems and limited communication of information [4]. Many pituitary patients express concern regarding the complexity of their care, and satisfaction improves with the delivery of more information by the HCP [4]. Patients with pituitary tumors, and CD specifically, require multidisciplinary care which necessitates effective communication in order to provide the best possible outcomes [5].

Similar to acromegaly patients [6], CD patients’ long-term well-being may be adversely affected by different perspectives and expectations between patients and HCPs, especially after treatment [7]. While HCPs primarily use biochemical data to define successful treatment, patients rely more on their symptoms and ability to regain normal functioning [7]. Despite achieving biochemical remission, CD patient perception of having persistent disease negatively impacts QoL [8]. In addition, 67.5% of Cushing’s syndrome patients report receiving insufficient information from their HCPs regarding the recovery experience after surgery despite the fact that all HCPs report providing this information [9]. Improved communication between HCPs and CD patients is vital to optimizing patients’ QoL and long term outcomes.

Recently there has been a growing emphasis on the use of internet-based platforms for healthcare delivery and education [10]. With the goals of offering HCP and patient education and assessing pituitary patients’ needs, since 2019 the pituitary center at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) has offered annual virtual educational programs for pituitary patients, caregivers, HCPs, and members of the pharmaceutical industry. For the current study, we gathered deidentified information from 2020 to 2022 MSK program participants on CD patients’ and HCPs’ attitudes about CD, related to their sense of hope, choice, and loneliness, through anonymous pre-program surveys. Our specific aims were to: (1) Assess differences in perspectives between patients’ and HCPs’ responses in the pre-program survey; (2) Compare patients’ and HCPs’ perceived care goals and unmet needs.

Methods

Educational program enrollment

The MSK program was offered to patients with any type of pituitary tumor as well as HCPs, family members, caregivers, and members of industry. The role of the registrant as a patient, caregiver/family member, HCP, and/or member of industry was determined for all registrants of the virtual programs.

Any patient with a pituitary tumor treated at our center and outside institutions, inclusive of patients at all points along their treatment journey, were invited to register for the virtual education program. HCPs, including endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, radiation oncologists, neurologists, ophthalmologists, neuro-oncologists, family medicine and internal medicine physicians, physicians in training and other allied health professionals who treat and manage patients with pituitary diseases were also invited to register. Invitations were sent through email to neuroendocrine experts and endocrinologists, patient support groups on social media, direct messaging to patients with pituitary tumors by their treating physicians and via patient databases, advertisements through endocrine societies, brochure/postcard mailing, and Eventbrite, a virtual platform for live events.

Study participants

Registrants from MSK virtual programs held on December 5, 2020, (n = 328) and April 9, 2022, (n = 327) were included in the pool of subjects, among which the qualifying participants were determined.

Of the 655 total registrants from the 2020 and 2022 programs, 320 (48.9%) were patients or caregivers and 309 (47.2%) were HCPs (Fig. 1). Of the 147 providers (88 in 2020 and 59 in 2022) that attended and filled out a pre-program survey 31 were excluded from our analysis. Eight filled out surveys in both 2020 and 2022, 4 were members of industry, 3 did not fill out any responses, and 1 was not in the healthcare field. In addition, 12 providers had at least three fields missing in the survey and 3 had filled out two surveys for the same year, so they were also excluded. A total of 116 providers (72 from 2020 to 44 from 2022) were included in the analysis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Enrollment flowchart

Among the 320 pituitary patients who attended the programs (157 from 2020 to 163 from 2022), 53 identified as ‘patients with Cushing’s’ and submitted surveys (34 participants from 2020 to 19 from 2022). Seven patients were excluded from the 2022 surveys as they had also filled out surveys in 2020, leaving a final group of 46 patients who were included in the analysis.

Virtual education programs

For each program, there was a single day of live interactive programming, meaning that all participants attended at the same time. The programs were recorded and made available for several weeks as enduring material for registrants on an online website.

After joint sessions in the morning, both programs consisted of two tracks in the afternoon: the ‘provider/clinical track’ and the ‘patient/caregiver track’. During the programs, an ongoing chat reeled through the virtual program which allowed patients to continually ask questions. Faculty experts answered these questions in written responses directly within the chat and/or in spoken responses during one of the live broadcasted Q&A sessions. Additionally, the programs both included panel discussions answering patient questions and moderated patient discussions with invited patient speakers.

Study procedures

Through anonymous pre-program surveys distributed at the 2020 and 2022 symposia, patients and HCPs answered questions related to their own sense, or perception of their patients’ sense, of hope, choice, and loneliness in the context of living with CD. This survey was developed by a multidisciplinary team and has been reported previously [11]. Demographic and clinical information was also assessed including year of diagnosis, prior treatments, and current medications (for patients) and specialty and practice type (for providers), as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Multiple-choice questions assessing patients’ attitudes toward their disease included possible answers of ‘I have no hope for improvement,’ ‘I have some hope for improvement,’ and ‘I have a lot of hope for improvement;’ and ‘I have no choice in my treatment,’ ‘I have some choices in my treatment,’ and ‘I have many choices in my treatment.’ Patients were also asked to respond ‘TRUE’ or ‘FALSE’ to the following statements: ‘I feel alone living with my Cushing’s,’ ‘Hearing the journeys of other patients helps me better understand my own,’ and ‘I feel anxious about my Cushing’s diagnosis.’

Table 1 Patient demographic data
Table 2 Provider demographic data

Multiple-choice questions assessing providers’ attitudes about their patients’ Cushing’s included possible answers of ‘I have no hope for their improvement,’ ‘I have some hope for their improvement,’ and ‘I have a lot of hope for their improvement;’ and ‘my patients have no choice in their treatment,’ ‘my patients have some choices in their treatment,’ and ‘my patients have many choices in their treatment.’ Providers were also asked to respond ‘TRUE’ or ‘FALSE’ to the following statements: ‘my patients feel alone living with their Cushing’s,’ ‘Hearing the journeys of other patients helps will help my patients better understand their own,’ and ‘my patients feel anxious about their Cushing’s diagnosis.’

Additionally, patients were surveyed on care goals and unmet needs related to their treatment. Specifically, patients were asked, ‘What are the healthcare outcomes/goals that matter to you the most?’ and ‘What do you think are unmet needs for the diagnosis or treatment of your condition?’ The first question was intended to refer to the patient specifically, while the second question was meant to examine how the condition is treated in general. Survey responses were submitted as free text and subsequently grouped by the authors (AH and EBG) into nine different categories: (a) Quality of life (QoL)/Mental Health; (b) Medical Therapies/Tumor Control; (c) Education/Awareness; (d) Communications/Multidisciplinary Care; (e) Insurance/Access; (f) Fertility; (g) Controlling Comorbidities; (h) Support System and (i) none. Responses could receive multiple designations if applicable. AH coded the free text themes independently, then EBG reviewed each answer and corresponding grouping to confirm accuracy. If there was disagreement or confusion, coding from our prior work [11] was reviewed.

HCPs were also surveyed on care goals and unmet needs related to their patient’s treatment. Providers were asked, ‘What are the healthcare outcomes/goals that matter to you the most?’ and ‘what do you think are unmet needs for the diagnosis or treatment of your patient’s condition?’ The first question was intended to refer to the provider and their goals related to Cushing’s, while the second question was meant to examine how the condition is treated in general. Survey responses were submitted as free text and subsequently grouped by the authors (AH and EBG) into nine different categories: (a) Quality of life (QoL)/Mental Health; (b) Medical Therapies/Tumor Control; (c) Education/Awareness; (d) Communications/Multidisciplinary Care; (e) Insurance/Access; (f) Fertility; (g) Controlling Comorbidities; (h) Support System and (i) none. Responses could receive multiple designations if applicable.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented as counts and percentages for categorical variables and as medians and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables. The Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare gender and survey responses between the CD patient group and the HCP group. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and a P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SAS Software® (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.

Results

Between the 2020 and 2022 events, there was combined representation from 25 different countries. A map and a full list of the countries is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

figure 2

Map of registrant locations. Locations (listed alphabetically): Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Greece, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Jamaica, Latvia, Malaysia, Netherlands, New, Zealand, Oman, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, UK, US

From a total of 655 participants over two educational events, 46 patients with CD and 116 HCP caring for CD patients were included in the analysis. The demographic data of the patients and HCPs are outlined in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Median age of the patients and HCPs was 51 years. 78.3% of the CD group was female vs. 53.0% of the HCP group (P = 0.003).

CD patients ranged from newly diagnosed to being diagnosed 33 years prior. The HCPs who filled out the pre-program surveys were in practice for a mean duration of 18.5 years, with a range from 1 to 54 years.

As shown in Table 1, CD patients had a mean duration of suspected active disease prior to diagnosis of 5.26 years, as defined by onset of CD symptoms until diagnosis, and a mean duration of disease since diagnosis of 5.9 years. 42 (91%) had undergone surgical treatment of their Cushing’s. For those who underwent surgery, the mean number of surgeries was 1.17 (range 0–4). 20% had received pituitary radiation. Overall, 31% of patients were on medical therapy for Cushing’s. Metyrapone was the most used CD therapy (in 11%), followed by ketoconazole (in 9%). Of those requiring pituitary hormone replacement, 34.8% had one pituitary hormone deficiency and 21.7% had multiple hormone deficiencies. Thyroid hormone replacement (37%) and adrenal replacement (30%) were the most common.

As shown in Table 2, the majority of the HCPs were endocrinologists (72%) followed by neurosurgeons (9%) and nurses (8%). There was a total of 9 different specialties represented by the provider group. 16% of the providers worked in private practice, 16% were hospital based, and 16% worked in ‘unspecified clinical care.’ 38% of the providers practice type was ‘unspecified.’

Based on the pre-program survey responses, we identified different attitudes between patients and HCPs in several domains. Table 3 depicts pre-program survey responses from CD patients and HCPs assessing their attitudes about CD. 21.7% of patients reported they had no choices in their treatment, compared to 0.9% of HCPs (P < 0.001). Almost all HCPs (99.1%) reported that CD patients had least some choice in their management. In addition, less than half (45.7%) of patients reported they had a lot of hope for improvement whereas 71.3% of HCPs had a lot of hope for their patients’ improvement. Surprisingly, fewer CD patients reported feeling anxious about their diagnosis compared to HCPs’ perceived patient anxiety (65.2% vs 94.6%, P < 0.001). However, more patients tended to feel more alone living with CD than HCPs’ perception of such (60.9% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.08). Both CD patients and HCPs agreed that hearing the journeys of other CD patients would help patients better understand their own disease (97.8% vs 100%).

Table 3 Patient and provider attitudes by pre-program survey

CD patients and HCPs were also surveyed on their personal care goals and unmet needs, results of which are shown in Figs. 3A, B and 4A, B. The most common personal care goal concern for patients was ‘QoL/mental health’ which was reported by 70%, followed by ‘controlling comorbidities’ (39%) and ‘medical therapies/tumor control’ (24%). HCPs prioritized the same three care goals as patients but ‘medical therapies/tumor control’ was the most common (44%). ‘Controlling comorbidities’ and ‘QoL/mental health’ were the second and third most often HCP reported care goals (31 and 22% respectively). ‘Education/awareness’ was the most common perceived CD unmet need by patients (59%). HCPs reported both ‘medical therapies/tumor control’ and ‘education/awareness’ to be the most common unmet needs (35 and 26%, respectively). Examples of patient and provider responses, and how they were coded, are shown in Supplemental Table 1.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A Care goals according to participants with Cushing’s who completed pre-program survey. This pie graph represents the free-text survey response from patients regarding their personal care goals as categorized by topic. B Care goals according to providers who completed pre-program survey. This pie graph represents the free-text survey response from providers regarding their personal care goals as categorized by topic

Fig. 4
figure 4

A Unmet needs for the field of Cushing’s disease according to participants with Cushing’s who completed pre-program survey. This pie graph represents the free-text survey response from patients regarding unmet needs in Cushing’s as categorized by topic. B Unmet needs for the field of Cushing’s disease according to providers who completed pre-program survey. This pie graph represents the free-text survey response from providers regarding unmet needs in Cushing’s as categorized by topic

Discussion

This study examined the differences between patients and HCP-reported perceptions of living with CD. We identified several differences in disease outlook between CD patients and HCPs. We found that more patients than HCPs reported they had no choices in their treatment. Furthermore, less than half of patients reported they had a lot of hope for improvement whereas most (71.3%) of HCPs had a lot of hope for their patients’ improvement. Interestingly, fewer CD patients reported feeling anxious about their diagnosis compared to HCPs’ perceived patient anxiety, although a higher percentage of patients reported feeling alone living with CD compared to the HCPs’ perception of patient loneliness. We also identified HCP and patient differences in reported personal care goals and perceived unmet needs in the field. The most common personal care goal concern for patients was ‘QoL/mental health,’ whereas it was ‘medical therapies/tumor control’ for HCPs. ‘Education/awareness’ was the most commonly perceived unmet need by patients, whereas it was ‘medical therapies/tumor control’ for HCPs.

Our findings support prior work demonstrating a discrepancy between patients and HCPs regarding the need for improved multidisciplinary care [12]. 43% of patients listed ‘communication/multidisciplinary care’ as an unmet need in the field, compared to 3% of providers. Pituitary centers of excellence provide expert multidisciplinary care in the neuroendocrine, neurosurgical, and radiation oncology domains, but often lack expertise in mental and physical health domains salient for CD patients, who suffer from depression, anxiety, myopathy and joint pain. In order to offer comprehensive care, psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, pain medicine experts, physical therapists, and nutritionists with expertise in CD should be included in the pituitary center multidisciplinary team [13]. Our findings suggest that pituitary centers of excellence should take into account the most important personal care goal reported by CD patients, which is Qol/mental health, and provide expert treatment in this domain.

It is not surprising that Qol/mental health is the personal care goal most reported by CD patients. Prior assessment of acromegaly patients demonstrated the same finding: QoL/mental health was the most common personal care goal concern [11]. While surgical [14] and medical [15,16,17,18] treatment of Cushing’s improves QoL, QoL has been shown to remain impaired over time after treatment [19]. Several factors may contribute to long-term Qol impairments, including the presence of persistent disease, imperfect treatment modalities which themselves may be associated with burden and adverse side effects, and persistent comorbidities including depression, anxiety, fatigue, and overweight. Perception of disease status may also play a role in QoL. In surgically remitted CD patients, there may be discordance between biochemical remission and perceived disease status [8]. Specifically, this study found that of those with self-identified persistence of disease, 65% were in fact biochemically remitted. This group had lower QoL scores than the concordant group who self-identified as in remission with biochemical evidence of remission.

CD patients’ outlook on their condition, including their perception of choices and hope for change, has not been previously well described, despite the fact that these perceptions likely inform long term Qol. Patient outlook may be a modifiable target that if addressed, could improve long term patient well-being and outcomes. Aside from continuing progress in the development of new therapies for CD patients which can offer patients more objective choices in their treatment, other modalities should be considered. Prior work has shown that virtual educational programs improve acromegaly patients’ hope for improvement, perception of having choices in their treatment, and sense of loneliness [11]. Educational programs have also been shown to result in improved physical activity and sleep, and reduced pain levels in CS patients [20]. More work is needed to develop effective education programming tailored for CD patients to provide the appropriate support that these patients need.

Difference in HCP and patient disease perceptions may also play a role in Cushing’s patients’ quality of life and outcomes. Among a cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection for Cushing’s, 32.4% reported not receiving information from their doctors about the recovery experience, despite the fact that all physicians surveyed reported giving information about the recovery process [9]. Furthermore, 16.1% of patients in this cohort reported that not enough medical professionals were familiar with the symptoms of Cushing’s. Recovery time was also reported to be longer by patients than providers [9]. Similarly, discordance was found between acromegaly patients and HCPs regarding reported severity of symptoms, with patients more frequently reporting symptoms as severe compared to HCPs, and many patients reporting symptoms which were not reported by HCPs [6]. Improving communication between HCP and patients may positively affect CD patient outlook and QoL.

We identified a similar disparity between CD patients and HCP regarding care goals and unmet needs. 70% of patients surveyed considered QoL/mental health to be a top care goal, but only 22% of provider shared this goal. 59% of patients reported education/awareness as an unmet need, compared to 26% of HCPs. These findings support data shown by Acre et al. in which Cushing’s patients report a lack of symptom recognition by their providers [9]. HCPs should be aware that their patients may have different treatment priorities.

Our finding that more HCPs reported patient anxiety living with CD compared to patients themselves needs further exploration. This could reflect inadequate communication between HCP and patient, or skewed HCP perceptions of CD. This, and other findings in our study should be viewed in light of the small cohort, and as such, needs confirmation in larger cohorts and more in-depth symptom assessments. Additional limitations of our study include lack of paired patient-HCP responses as the HCPs included were not providing care for this specific CD cohort. Since this was a pituitary educational forum, likely most or all patients who identified as having Cushing’s had CD. However, our survey did not specify the type of surgery patients underwent or the etiology of their Cushing’s. Additionally, we used multidisciplinary team agreed upon measures and not validated assessments. Further work should consider validating a tool to assess patient-provider discordances. Our findings may also be confounded by selection bias, given that the patients participating in our virtual education programs are more likely to be under the care of experts in the field and may not represent the attitudes of all patients living with CD. Finally, the included HCPs were representatives from a range of specialties with different levels of experience taking care of patients with CD which may also affect their responses.

Our findings highlight the importance of understanding CD patients’ outlook and perspective in their condition, and that they may differ from their HCP. More than half of CD patients did not have a lot of hope for improvement and reported feeling alone, and many patients felt they had no choices in their treatment. QOL/mental health was the most commonly reported care goal for patients, which was not the case for HCPs. Comprehensive multidisciplinary care for CD patients should include mental health professionals with expertise in CD. Regular open communication between HCPs and CD patients will help bridge perception differences and facilitate personalized care, which will ultimately improve long-term outcomes for CD patients.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon request.

References

  1. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK (2006) Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 367(9522):1605–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68699-6

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Siegel S, Gammel C et al (2018) Support needs of patients with Cushing’s disease and Cushing’s syndrome: results of a survey conducted in Germany and the USA. Int J Endocrinol 2018:9014768. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9014768

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  3. Feelders RA, Pulgar SJ, Kempel A, Pereira AM (2012) The burden of Cushing’s disease: clinical and health-related quality of life aspects. Eur J Endocrinol 167(3):311–326. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-11-1095

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donegan D, Gowan T, Gruber R et al (2021) The need for patient-centered education among patients newly diagnosed with a pituitary tumor. J Endocr Soc. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab061

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  5. Frara S, Rodriguez-Carnero G, Formenti AM, Martinez-Olmos MA, Giustina A, Casanueva FF (2020) Pituitary tumors centers of excellence. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 49(3):553–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2020.05.010

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Geer EB, Sisco J, Adelman DT et al (2020) Observed discordance between outcomes reported by acromegaly patients and their treating endocrinology medical provider. Pituitary 23(2):140–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-019-01013-2

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Webb SM, Valassi E (2022) Quality of life impairment after a diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Pituitary 25(5):768–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-022-01245-9

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  8. Carluccio A, Sundaram NK, Chablani S et al (2015) Predictors of quality of life in 102 patients with treated Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 82(3):404–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12521

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Acree R, Miller CM, Abel BS, Neary NM, Campbell K, Nieman LK (2021) Patient and provider perspectives on postsurgical recovery of Cushing syndrome. J Endocr Soc. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab109

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  10. Ca BM, Badiu C, Bonomi M et al (2017) Developing and evaluating rare disease educational materials co-created by expert clinicians and patients: the paradigm of congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Orphanet J Rare Dis 12(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0608-2

    Article Google Scholar

  11. Geer EB, Kilgallon JL, Liebert KJP, Kimball A, Nachtigall LB (2022) Virtual education programming for patients with acromegaly: a pilot study. Eur J Endocrinol 186(3):341–349. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-1071

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Valassi E, Santos A, Yaneva M et al (2011) The European registry on Cushing’s syndrome: 2-year experience. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Eur J Endocrinol 165(3):383–392. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-11-0272

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Casanueva FF, Barkan AL, Buchfelder M et al (2017) Criteria for the definition of pituitary tumor centers of excellence (PTCOE): a pituitary society statement. Pituitary 20(5):489–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0838-2

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  14. Santos A, Resmini E, Martinez-Momblan MA et al (2012) Psychometric performance of the Cushing QoL questionnaire in conditions of real clinical practice. Eur J Endocrinol 167(3):337–342. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-12-0325

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Colao A, Petersenn S, Newell-Price J et al (2012) A 12-month phase 3 study of pasireotide in Cushing’s disease. N Engl J Med 366(10):914–924. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1105743

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Fleseriu M, Biller BM, Findling JW et al (2012) Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, produces clinical and metabolic benefits in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(6):2039–2049. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-3350

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Geer EB, Salvatori R, Elenkova A et al (2021) Levoketoconazole improves clinical signs and symptoms and patient-reported outcomes in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Pituitary 24(1):104–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01103-6

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s disease (LINC 3): a multicentre phase III study with a double-blind, randomised withdrawal phase. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 8(9):748–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30240-0

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Page-Wilson G, Oak B, Silber A et al (2023) Evaluating the burden of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome using a web-based questionnaire and validated patient-reported outcome measures. Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-023-01314-7

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  20. Martínez-Momblán MA, Gómez C, Santos A et al (2016) A specific nursing educational program in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrine 53:199–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0737-0

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the HCP and patient participants who attended the events, the MSK faculty, invited speakers, Leslie Edwin of Cushing’s Support and Research Foundation, Amy Edouard and the MSK CME team, and Recordati Rare Diseases, Inc., Amryt Pharma (previously Chiasma, Inc.), Crinetics, Sparrow Pharmaceuticals, Corcept Therapeutics, and Xeris Biopharma (previously Strongbridge Biopharma) for providing educational grants for these educational activities.

Funding

This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Amanda Halstrom

  2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

    I.-Hsin Lin

  3. Multidisciplinary Pituitary & Skull Base Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

    Andrew Lin, Marc Cohen, Viviane Tabar & Eliza B. Geer

  4. Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

    Andrew Lin

  5. Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

    Andrew Lin, Marc Cohen & Eliza B. Geer

  6. Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

    Marc Cohen & Viviane Tabar

  7. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

    Eliza B. Geer

Contributions

A.H. and E.B.G. wrote the manuscript text and prepared the figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliza B. Geer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

As an educational quality initiative project using de-identified data, it was determined that our project did not constitute human subjects research and thus did not require IRB oversight.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Navigating the Surgical Landscape: A Comprehensive Analysis of Endoscopic vs. Microscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery Outcomes

Abstract

Pituitary surgery, a critical intervention for various pituitary disorders, has sparked ongoing debates regarding the preference between endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal approaches. This systematic review delves into the outcomes associated with these techniques, taking into account the recent advancements in neurosurgery. The minimally invasive nature of endoscopy, providing improved visualization and reduced morbidity, stands in contrast to the well-established track record of the conventional microscopic method. Examining outcomes for disorders such as Cushing’s disease and acromegaly, the review synthesizes evidence from Denmark, Bulgaria, and China. Noteworthy advantages of endoscopy encompass higher resection rates, shorter surgery durations, and fewer complications, endorsing its effectiveness in pituitary surgery. While emphasizing the necessity for prospective trials, the review concludes that endoscopic approaches consistently showcase favorable outcomes, influencing the ongoing discourse on the optimal surgical strategies for pituitary disorders.

Introduction & Background

Pituitary surgery is a critical intervention for various pituitary disorders, and the choice between endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal approaches has been a subject of ongoing debate within the medical community. This systematic review aims to explore and analyze the outcomes associated with endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. As advancements in surgical techniques continue to shape the field of neurosurgery, understanding the comparative effectiveness of these two approaches becomes imperative. The endoscopic approach, characterized by its minimally invasive nature, has gained popularity for pituitary surgery in recent years [1]. Proponents argue that it provides enhanced visualization, improved maneuverability, and reduced patient morbidity. On the other hand, traditional microscopic transsphenoidal surgery has been the conventional method for decades, known for its familiarity among surgeons and established track record [2].

Several studies have investigated the outcomes of these approaches in treating pituitary disorders, including but not limited to Cushing’s disease, pituitary adenomas, and other tumors. For instance, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Chen et al. compared endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery specifically for Cushing’s disease, shedding light on the effectiveness of these approaches in managing this specific condition [3]. Moreover, Møller et al. reported promising results for endoscopic pituitary surgery based on the experiences of experienced microscopic pituitary surgeons, indicating a potential shift towards the adoption of the endoscopic technique [1]. Guo et al. conducted a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of microscopic and endoscopic surgery for treating pituitary disorders, contributing valuable insights into the overall efficacy of these approaches [4].

This review aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on pituitary surgery by providing a comprehensive analysis of the outcomes associated with endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal approaches. By synthesizing the existing evidence, we strive to offer valuable insights that can guide both clinicians and researchers in making informed decisions regarding the optimal surgical approach for pituitary disorders.

Review

Materials and methods

This systematic review strictly adheres to the established Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, employing a comprehensive approach to investigate the outcomes of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. The subsequent sections delineate the criteria for study inclusion, the search strategy utilized, and the methodology employed for data synthesis.

Search Strategy

We conducted a meticulous search across prominent electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, to identify pertinent articles. Our search strategy comprised a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords related to pituitary surgery, encompassing both endoscopic and microscopic approaches. Boolean operators (AND, OR) were strategically employed to refine the search and identify studies meeting our predetermined inclusion criteria. The search string used for PubMed was (“Outcomes” OR “Treatment Outcome” OR “Surgical Outcome”) AND (“Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery” OR “Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery” OR “Endoscopic Hypophysectomy”) AND (“Microscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery” OR “Microscopic Pituitary Surgery” OR “Microscopic Hypophysectomy” OR “Endoscopy”[Mesh] OR “Endoscopy, Surgical”[Mesh] OR “Transsphenoidal Hypophysectomy”[Mesh] OR “Microsurgery”[Mesh] OR “Microscopic Hypophysectomy”[Mesh]).

Eligibility Criteria

Stringent inclusion criteria were predefined to ensure the selection of high-quality and relevant studies. The included studies focused on investigating the outcomes of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals within the timeframe from the inception of relevant databases until October 2023 were considered. Exclusion criteria encompassed studies on other interventions, those lacking sufficient data on surgical outcomes, and studies solely involving animal cells. Additionally, only studies in the English language with full-text availability were included, and gray literature was not considered eligible.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent reviewers meticulously screened titles and abstracts to identify potentially eligible studies. Subsequently, full-text articles were retrieved and evaluated for adherence to inclusion criteria. Discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion and consultation with a third reviewer. Relevant data, including study design, patient characteristics, interventions, and surgical outcomes, were systematically extracted using a predefined data extraction form.

Data Analysis

A narrative synthesis approach was employed to summarize findings from included studies due to anticipated heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures. Key themes and patterns related to the outcomes of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery were identified and presented.

Results

Study Selection Process

Following four database searches, 97 articles were initially identified. After eliminating eight duplicates, the titles and abstracts of the remaining 89 publications were evaluated. Subsequently, 17 potential studies underwent eligibility verification through a thorough examination of their full texts. Ultimately, three articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. No additional studies meeting the eligibility criteria were found during the examination of references in the selected articles. The entire process is visually depicted in the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1).

PRISMA-flow-diagram-of-the-selection-of-studies-for-inclusion-in-the-systematic-review.
Figure 1: PRISMA flow diagram of the selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review.

PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Characteristics of Selected Studies

Overall, three papers met the inclusion criteria. Two studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one each from Bulgaria and China. One study was an observational study from Denmark. The main findings and characteristics of the included studies are mentioned in the following tables (Table 1 and Table 2).

Author Year Country Study type Sample size No. of participants in the endoscopic group No. of participants in the microscopic group Main findings
Møller et al. [1] 2020 Denmark Observational study 240 45 195 The study comparing endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery revealed that the endoscopic technique exhibited advantages, achieving a higher rate of gross total resection (39% vs. 22%) and shorter surgery duration (86 minutes vs. 106 minutes). Complications within 30 days were lower with the endoscope (17% vs. 27%), and grade II complications or higher were significantly reduced (4% vs. 20%) compared to the microscopic approach. Pituitary function outcomes favored the endoscope, with fewer new deficiencies in the HPA axis (3% vs. 34%) and TSH-dependent deficiencies (15% vs. 38%). The HPG axis also showed better normalization in the endoscopic group (32% vs. 19%). Visual field impairment and postoperative improvement did not significantly differ between the two techniques. Overall, the findings suggest that endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery may offer superior outcomes compared to the microscopic approach, particularly in terms of resection rates and complication profiles.
Vassilyeva et al. [5] 2023 Bulgaria RCT 83 43 40 The study compared endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in acromegaly patients, revealing comparable demographic profiles between the groups. Endoscopic surgery demonstrated advantages with shorter anesthesia and surgery times, as well as a reduced postoperative hospital stay. Complete tumor removal was more frequent with endoscopic adenomectomy, while microscopic surgery showed a higher rate of sub-total removal. Both techniques led to a tendency for somatic improvement, with more pronounced visual function improvement in the endoscopic group. Complications, such as liquorrhea and endocrine disorders, were generally low, with endoscopic surgery showing mainly mild complications. Disease remission rates were similar between the groups at various follow-up intervals. In conclusion, while both techniques proved effective in achieving remission, endoscopic surgery exhibited favorable outcomes in terms of efficiency and some aspects of complication profiles.
Zhang et al. [6] 2021 China RCT 46 23 23 Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery for the treatment of Cushing’s disease showed comparable efficacy to microscopic transseptal pituitary surgery but with the added benefits of shorter operative time, reduced estimated blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications.
Table 1: Summary of the studies included in this systematic review.

RCT: randomized controlled trial; HPA: hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; HPG: hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal

Technique Møller et al. [1] Vassilyeva et al. [5] Zhang et al. [6]
Male-to-female ratio (endoscopic) 25:20 17:26 13:10
Male-to-female ratio (microscopic) 107:88 16:24 12:11
Mean age in years (endoscopic) 61 43.26 55.6
Mean age in years (microscopic) 58 44.12 53.2
Functional tumors (endoscopic) 15 All functional All functional
Non-functional tumors (endoscopic) 29
Functional tumors (microscopic) 69 All functional All functional
Non-functional tumors (microscopic) 115
Microadenoma size (mm) (endoscopic) 4 19
Macroadenoma size (mm) (endoscopic) 39 4
Microadenoma size (mm) (microscopic) 3 18
Macroadenoma size (mm) (microscopic) 37 5
Mean operative time (min) (endoscopic) 86 142 108
Mean operative time (min) (microscopic) 106 176 174
Mean hospital stay (days) (endoscopic) 5 2.8
Mean hospital stay (days) (microscopic) 7 5.1
Postoperative complications (endoscopic) 2 15 3
Postoperative complications (microscopic) 39 10 8
Table 2: Summary of demographics, tumor characteristics, and postoperative outcomes of the studies included in this systematic review.

The quality assessment of the selected studies was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. All three studies included in this study turned out to be of high quality with a rating of 9/9 stars (Table 3).

Author Selection Comparability Outcome Total stars
Møller et al. [1] ★★★★ ★★ ★★★ ★★★★★★★★★
Vassilyeva et al. [5] ★★★★ ★★ ★★★ ★★★★★★★★★
Zhang et al. [6] ★★★★ ★★ ★★★ ★★★★★★★★★
Table 3: Quality assessment of the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.

Discussion

This systematic review thoroughly assesses the effectiveness and results of endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in comparison to microscopic transsphenoidal surgery, with a specific focus on pituitary adenomas, including Cushing’s disease and acromegaly. The results contribute significant insights into the evolving landscape of pituitary surgery, highlighting the benefits and limitations of both surgical techniques.

The selected studies offer valuable insights into the comparative outcomes. Møller et al.’s observational study in Denmark suggests that endoscopic surgery exhibits superior outcomes with higher gross total resection rates, shorter surgery duration, and fewer complications [1]. Vassilyeva et al.’s RCT in Bulgaria, focusing on acromegaly patients, indicates endoscopic advantages such as shorter anesthesia and surgery times, reduced postoperative stay, and comparable remission rates [5]. Zhang et al.’s RCT in China, specifically for Cushing’s disease, suggests comparable efficacy with added benefits favoring endoscopy [6].

The endoscopic approach has been advocated for its panoramic visualization and superior mobility, which are crucial in resecting tumors while preserving normal structures [7,8]. Studies have shown a higher remission rate in endoscopic procedures for endocrine-active tumors, like growth hormone or adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting adenomas, compared to the microscopic approach [9,10]. Patient comfort and recovery play a significant role in evaluating surgical methods. The endoscopic technique, by avoiding submucosal excision of nasal tissues, typically results in less postoperative pain and rhinological dysfunction. Studies, including ours, have reported shorter operative times and hospital stays with endoscopic surgery, attributed to fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications and a reduced need for wound management [11-13].

Safety is paramount to any surgical intervention. The endoscopic method has shown a decrease in common complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, pituitary hormone dysfunction, and diabetes insipidus. Additionally, the endoscopic procedure exhibited fewer complications, which could be attributed to the enhanced visualization allowing for more precise tumor excision and preservation of vital structures [14-16].

In the context of acromegaly patients, the endoscopic technique has demonstrated increased radicality in tumor removal. Our review aligns with these findings, showing a higher rate of total tumor resection in endoscopic patients compared to those undergoing microscopic surgery. This improved outcome is likely due to better illumination and a wider angle of vision provided by endoscopic operations [5,17].

The endoscopic technique has shown a statistically significant improvement in visual function post surgery compared to the microscopic method. However, the frequency of certain postoperative complications, such as intraoperative liquorrhea, was higher in microscopic surgery. These differences underline the importance of the surgical technique in influencing the outcomes and complications of pituitary surgery [5,18].

Despite these findings, it is important to recognize the limitations inherent in these studies. Factors such as tumor size, density, and localization significantly influence surgical outcomes and procedure times. Additionally, the retrospective nature of many studies introduces potential biases, underscoring the need for more prospective, randomized trials for a comprehensive understanding of the long-term outcomes of these techniques.

Conclusions

This systematic review comparing endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery outcomes indicates consistent evidence favoring the endoscopic approach. Notable studies from Denmark, Bulgaria, and China reveal superior results with endoscopic surgery, demonstrating higher resection rates, shorter surgery duration, and fewer complications. Endoscopy’s benefits extend to patient comfort, as evidenced by shorter operative times and hospital stays. Safety considerations also support endoscopy, showing a decrease in common complications such as CSF leaks and hormonal dysfunction. Despite these strengths, the review underscores the need for prospective, randomized trials to address limitations and provide a comprehensive understanding of long-term outcomes.

References

  1. Møller MW, Andersen MS, Glintborg D, Pedersen CB, Halle B, Kristensen BW, Poulsen FR: Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a single centre study. Sci Rep. 2020, 10:21942. 10.1038/s41598-020-78823-z
  2. Gao Y, Zhong C, Wang Y, et al.: Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2014, 12:94. 10.1186/1477-7819-12-94
  3. Chen J, Liu H, Man S, et al.: Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for the treatment of pituitary adenoma: a meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2022, 8:806855. 10.3389/fsurg.2021.806855
  4. Guo S, Wang Z, Kang X, Xin W, Li X: A meta-analysis of endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for non-functioning and functioning pituitary adenomas: comparisons of efficacy and safety. Front Neurol. 2021, 12:614382. 10.3389/fneur.2021.614382
  5. Vassilyeva N, Mena N, Kirov K, Diatlova E: Comparative effectiveness of endoscopic and microscopic adenoma removal in acromegaly. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023, 14:1128345. 10.3389/fendo.2023.1128345
  6. Zhang T, Zhang B, Yuan L, Song Y, Wang F: Superiority of endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery to microscopic transseptal pituitary surgery for treatment of Cushing’s disease. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2021, 67:1687-91. 10.1590/1806-9282.20210732
  7. Yadav Y, Sachdev S, Parihar V, Namdev H, Bhatele P: Endoscopic endonasal trans-sphenoid surgery of pituitary adenoma. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012, 3:328-37. 10.4103/0976-3147.102615
  8. Louis RG, Eisenberg A, Barkhoudarian G, Griffiths C, Kelly DF: Evolution of minimally invasive approaches to the sella and parasellar region. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, 18:S136-48. 10.1055/s-0034-1395265
  9. Broersen LH, Biermasz NR, van Furth WR, de Vries F, Verstegen MJ, Dekkers OM, Pereira AM: Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary. 2018, 21:524-34. 10.1007/s11102-018-0893-3
  10. Torales J, Halperin I, Hanzu F, et al.: Endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary tumors. Results in a series of 121 patients operated at the same center and by the same neurosurgeon. Endocrinol Nutr. 2014, 61:410-6. 10.1016/j.endoen.2014.07.002
  11. Zubair A, M Das J: Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL); 2023.
  12. Pan X, Ma Y, Fang M, Jiang J, Shen J, Zhan R: Improvement in the quality of early postoperative course after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: description of surgical technique and outcome. Front Neurol. 2020, 11:527323. 10.3389/fneur.2020.527323
  13. Aiyer RG, Upreti G: Endoscopic endo-nasal trans-sphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas: a prospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020, 72:36-43. 10.1007/s12070-019-01725-8
  14. Oertel J, Gaab MR, Linsler S: The endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to sellar lesions allows a high radicality: the benefit of angled optics. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016, 146:29-34. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.04.016
  15. Hanson M, Li H, Geer E, Karimi S, Tabar V, Cohen MA: Perioperative management of endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020, 6:84-93. 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.01.005
  16. Qiao N: Endocrine outcomes of endoscopic versus transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas: a system review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018, 169:107-15. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.009
  17. Nie D, Fang Q, Wong W, Gui S, Zhao P, Li C, Zhang Y: The effect of endoscopic transsphenoidal somatotroph tumors resection on pituitary hormones: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2023, 21:71. 10.1186/s12957-023-02958-2
  18. Butenschoen VM, Schwendinger N, von Werder A, Bette S, Wienke M, Meyer B, Gempt J: Visual acuity and its postoperative outcome after transsphenoidal adenoma resection. Neurosurg Rev. 2021, 44:2245-51. 10.1007/s10143-020-01408-x

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/213241-navigating-the-surgical-landscape-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-endoscopic-vs-microscopic-transsphenoidal-pituitary-surgery-outcomes#!/