Prednisolone May Raise Cholesterol in Adrenal Insufficiency

Posted on April 4, 2026 by MaryO

Prednisolone treatment of patients with adrenal insufficiency is associated with significantly elevated total-and low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels compared with use of an alternative glucocorticoid, hydrocortisone, new data suggest.

Real-world data from the European Adrenal Insufficiency Registry (EU-AIR) were presented on April 2 here at ENDO 2017: The Endocrine Society Annual Meeting by Robert D Murray, MBBS, consultant endocrinologist and honorary associate professor at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

In an interview, Dr Murray told Medscape Medical News, “In addition to previous data showing that prednisolone can cause lower bone mass, we’ve now shown that it may raise cholesterol to a higher degree than hydrocortisone.”

Asked to comment, session moderator Constantine A Stratakis, MD, chief medical officer of the National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, said: “These are significant findings. I think that the difference he’s seeing may be mostly due to the differences in how glucocorticoids are metabolized locally in the liver and fat tissues.”

Regarding clinical implications, Dr Stratakis said, “These data point to the need for using hydrocortisone. Clearly, at these doses anyway, you have increases in LDL and cholesterol with prednisolone.”

Indeed, the new findings support recent recommendations from the Endocrine Society to use hydrocortisone as first-line glucocorticoid replacement therapy for primary adrenal insufficiency.

But the huge cost difference between the two generic medications has led some to suggest otherwise. In 2014, the BMJ published editorials arguing both for and against the preferred use of prednisolone.

During his presentation, Dr Murray reported that in the United Kingdom, an annual supply of 5-mg prednisolone (one tablet a day) costs about £16 and 3 mg (three 1-mg tablets a day) about £48, compared with £1910 for a year’s supply of twice-daily 10-mg hydrocortisone.

(Hydrocortisone is also considerably more expensive than prednisolone in the United States, although the differential isn’t quite as dramatic.)

Dr Murray pointed out that about 75% of the patients in the database were taking 5 mg/day of prednisolone and that although that’s within the recommended range (3–5 mg/day), it might be too much. “I suspect this isn’t related to the steroid use, but that we may actually have gotten the doses wrong, and we may need a smaller dose of prednisolone. I think probably in reality the ideal dose is probably nearer to 3.5 to 4 mg. Therefore, I think we may be slightly overtreating these people and both the bone mass and the cholesterol may be a reflection of that.

“I think for now we have to stay with hydrocortisone as our mainstay of treating adrenal insufficiency, but I think more studies need to be done in patients taking 3.5 to 4.0 mg to then look at the effects on cholesterol, bone mass, and other markers….It would be quite a significant saving if we were able to move patients to prednisolone,” he added.

Dr Stratakis commented, “I have to say the price difference to me is amazing.” Asked about Dr Murray’s dose hypothesis, he responded, “It is possible we may be giving more prednisolone than we should. Also, there might be important differences in the handling of glucocorticoids at the tissue level, in fat and liver, specifically, that we don’t account for.”

Hydrocortisone vs Prednisolone

Beginning his presentation, Dr Murray noted that data on risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with adrenal insufficiency treated with prednisolone are scarce, despite this condition being the predominant cause of excess mortality, and so in this analysis he and his colleagues aimed to address this gap in the literature.

EU-AIR is a prospective, observational study, initiated in August 2012 to monitor the long-term safety of glucocorticoids in patients with adrenal insufficiency, and of 946 enrolled — in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom — 91.8% were using hydrocortisone for glucocorticoid replacement therapy compared to just 6.8% using prednisone, with marked heterogeneity in doses and frequency and timing of dosing (Endocrine Abstracts. 2015: DOI:10.1530/endoabs.37.EP39).

Other previous studies have found lower bone mass at the hip and spine with prednisolone compared with hydrocortisone-treated patients, but no quality-of-life difference between the two treatments, Dr Murray said.

The current study is the first patient-matched analysis of cardiovascular-risk-factor differences for the two glucocorticoid therapies. Patients were excluded if they were receiving more than one glucocorticoid, had congenital adrenal hyperplasia, were receiving modified-release hydrocortisone, or were receiving prednisolone or hydrocortisone doses outside the Endocrine Society’s recommended ranges.

Prior to matching, the 909 hydrocortisone patients were significantly more likely to be female, to have primary adrenal insufficiency, to be older, and to have longer disease duration. After matching three hydrocortisone patients for every one taking prednisolone, the 141 hydrocortisone and 47 prednisolone patients were similar for those factors: 62% were female, 40% had primary adrenal insufficiency, average age was around 59 years, and disease duration 23 years.

Both total cholesterol and LDL levels were significantly higher, at 6.3 and 3.9 mmol/L, respectively, in the prednisolone group compared with 5.4 and 3.2 mmol/L for hydrocortisone (both P < .05). However, there were no significant differences in rates of hypertension, diabetes (of either type), blood pressure, triglycerides, or HDL cholesterol.

In subgroup analysis, both total and LDL cholesterol were elevated among patients with primary adrenal insufficiency taking prednisolone, but among those with only secondary adrenal insufficiency, just total cholesterol was elevated with prednisolone.

Dr Stratakis told Medscape Medical News, “It is peculiar for me to see that the only difference he found from all the parameters he measured were in lipids, and specifically total cholesterol and LDL. I think the difference is tissue-specific.”

Dr Murray said it’s certainly plausible that the current prednisolone dosing is too high for two reasons: First, in the United Kingdom prednisolone comes in 1-mg and 5-mg tablets, so taking 5 mg/day is simpler than taking the lower end of the recommended range.

Second, “hydrocortisone is cortisol, so you know what the body produces and about what your levels should be, but you can’t do that with prednisone because it’s an analog. So, we’re guessing, and I think we’ve guessed too high.”

Dr Murray is a speaker and consultant to Shire. Disclosures for the coauthors are listed in the abstract. Dr Stratakis has no relevant financial relationships.   

For more diabetes and endocrinology news, follow us on Twitter and on Facebook.

ENDO 2017. April 2, 2017; Orlando, Florida. Abstract OR03-5

 

From http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/878097

Filed under: adrenal, Rare Diseases | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Day 3: Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 3, 2026 by MaryO

me-tired

Sleep.  Naps.  Fatigue, Exhaustion.  I still have them all.  I wrote on my bio in 1987 after my pituitary surgery “I am still and always tired and need a nap most days. I do not, however, still need to take whole days off just to sleep.”

That seems to be changing back, at least on the weekends.  A recent weekend, both days, I took 7-hour naps each day and I still woke up tired. That’s awfully close to taking a whole day off to sleep again.

In 2006, I flew to Chicago, IL for a Cushing’s weekend in Rockford.  Someone else drove us to Lake Geneva, Wisconsin for the day.  Too much travel, too Cushie, whatever, I was too tired to stay awake.  I actually had put my head down on the dining room table and fallen asleep but our hostess suggested the sofa instead.  Amazing that I traveled that whole distance – and missed the main event 😦

This sleeping thing really impacts my life.  Between piano lessons, I take a nap.  I sleep as late as possible in the mornings and afternoons are pretty much taken up by naps.  I nod off at night during TV. One time I came home between church services and missed the third service because I fell asleep.

I only TiVo old tv shows that I can watch and fall asleep to since I already know the ending.

Since  mid-February, I have been doing physical therapy twice a week for 2 hours at a time for a knee injury (read more about that in Bees Knees).  I come home from that exhausted – and in more pain than I went.  I know it’s working and my knee is getting better, but it’s such a time and energy sapper.  Neither of which I can really spare.

Maybe now that I’m nearly 10  years out from my kidney cancer (May 9, 2006) I could theoretically go back on Growth Hormone again.  My surgeon says he “thinks” it’s ok.  I’m sort of afraid to ask my endo about it, though.  I want to feel better and get the benefits of the GH again but I don’t want any type of cancer again and I certainly can’t afford to lose another kidney.

I’ll probably just muddle through without it.  I always laugh when I see that commercial online for something called Serovital.  I saw it in Costco the other day and it mentions pituitary right on the package.  I wish I could take the people buying this, sit them down and tell them not to mess with their pituitary glands.  But I won’t.  I’ll take a nap instead because I’m feeling so old and weary today, and yesterday.

And tomorrow…

Filed under: Cancer, Cushing's, pituitary, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Longer-Acting Growth Hormones Promising for Adult GH Deficiency

Posted on April 3, 2026 by MaryO

Two investigational long-acting growth-hormone (GH) replacement products hold potential for less frequent dosing and improved adherence among adult patients with proven growth-hormone deficiency.

Adult growth-hormone deficiency is a rare disorder characterized by the inadequate secretion of the growth hormone from the pituitary gland. It can be hereditary; can be acquired as a result of trauma, infection, radiation therapy, or brain tumor growth; and can even emerge without a diagnosable cause. Currently, it is treated with once-daily injections of subcutaneous growth hormone.

The new results, from a 26-week phase 3 trial of Novo Nordisk’s once-weekly growth-hormone derivative somapacitan and a dose-finding phase 2 safety study of Versartis’s long-acting recombinant growth hormone somavaratan, both in adult patients with growth-hormone deficiency, were presented here at ENDO 2017: The Endocrine Society Annual Meeting.

“Compliance is often a problem with daily growth-hormone injections in children and even with adults,” session moderator Luma Ghalib, MD, assistant professor in the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, told Medscape Medical News.

“Patients will often stop taking the daily medications, sometimes because of the cost but also because the daily injections are cumbersome. So the two longer-acting agents that have been studied will be an amazing breakthrough if they get [US FDA]-approved.”

But, she cautioned, longer-term data are needed. “In the long term, we worry about the metabolic effects. We know growth hormone can increase insulin resistance and diabetes, so we have to keep an eye on the peaks.”

And, she added, there could be a small risk for regrowth of the pituitary adenoma that caused the growth-hormone deficiency. “The risk will probably be slim because we haven’t seen regrowth with the daily dosing, but it hasn’t been studied.”

Once-Weekly Somapacitan Found Safe, Well-Tolerated

Gudmundur Johannsson, MD, PhD, professor and chief physician at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, reported findings from the 26-week multicenter, multinational, randomized open-label parallel-group trial of somapacitan, a reversible albumin-binding human GH derivative intended for once-weekly subcutaneous administration.

A total of 92 adults (aged 18-79 years) who had been previously treated with once-daily growth-hormone replacement for at least 6 months were randomized 2:1 (after a 1-day washout) to either once-weekly somapacitan or once-daily somatropin (Norditropin, Novo Nordisk). Doses of both were titrated for the first 8 weeks to achieve normal insulinlike growth factor (IGF)-1 levels (target 0–2 standard deviation scores) and remained fixed for the subsequent 18 weeks.

Patients were around 50 years of age, 45% female, with body mass index 28 kg/m2. After remaining stable in both arms following titration, mean serum IGF-1 standard-deviation scores at week 25 were 0.22 for somapacitan and 0.35 for somatropin.

The primary outcome, incidence of adverse events including injection-site reactions, was similar between the two groups. Total adverse events occurred in 53 of 61 (86.9%) with somapacitan vs 21 of 31 (67.5%) with somatropin and included nasopharyngitis, headache, fatigue, dizziness, and arthralgia. Serious adverse events occurred in four (6.6%) with somapacitan and two (6.5%) with somatropin.

Of more than 1500 somapacitan injections given, there were two mild, transient, injection-site reactions (hematoma and bruising). No antibodies to somapacitan or GH were detected.

At week 26, patients’ scores on the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9) for convenience, effectiveness, and satisfaction all favored somapacitan over somatropin.

Additional phase 3 trials in adults with growth-hormone deficiency are ongoing, as well as a phase 2 trial in children, a Novo Nordisk spokesperson told Medscape Medical News.

Somavaratan Dose-Finding Study Yields 2-Week Response

Kevin CJ Yuen, MD, MBChB, medical director of the Swedish Pituitary Center, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, presented findings from an open-label, multicenter phase 2 study of somavaratan, a novel long-acting form of recombinant human growth hormone. The study aimed to evaluate starting dose, dose titration plan, and safety and to determine the IGF-1 response with 30-day dosing.

Patients were allocated into three starting dose cohorts: 0.6 mg/kg/month for those aged 35 and older, 0.8 mg/kg/month for those younger than 35, and 1.0 mg/kg/month for women on oral estrogen, regardless of age. All received five monthly subcutaneous doses of somavaratan with a target IGF-1 standard deviation score of 0–1.5. In all, 32 of 49 patients completed the study.

The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions (19.4%) and headache (11.1%), mostly mild or moderate. No severe adverse events were deemed related to somavaratan.

Mean IGF-I SDS increased from -1.32 at baseline to +2.31 at 7 days after the first dose, with subjects within each cohort who received higher doses tending to have higher IGF-1 responses. Following the last study dose, IGF-1 standard-deviation scores returned to baseline by day 22.

Thus, Dr Yuen said, twice-monthly administration will be studied going forward. Starting somavaratan dose and administration frequency are being investigated further in the extension study and then will be carried forward in a new phase 3 study.

Speaking about both products, Dr Ghalib told Medscape Medical News: “We are waiting. Less frequent dosing will make our lives and definitely the patients’ lives a lot easier.”

Dr Johannsson is a consultant and/or speaker for Viropharma, Shire, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Otsuka, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Serono, Pfizer, and Ipsen. Dr Yuen is an investigator and/or medical advisory board member for Pfizer, Opko, Novo Nordisk, Versartis, and Sandoz. Dr Ghalib has no relevant financial relationships.  

For more diabetes and endocrinology news, follow us on Twitter and on Facebook.

ENDO 2017. April 1, 2017; Orlando, Florida. Abstract OR22-1, Abstract OR22-2

From http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/878088

Filed under: pituitary, Treatments | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

Day 2, Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 2, 2026 by MaryO

The Seven Dwarves of Cushing's

So, these are only seven of the many, many symptoms of Cushing’s.  I had those above – and I often felt like I looked like one of those little bearded dwarves.

Cushing’s affects every part of the body.  It’s not like when I had kidney cancer and only the kidney was affected.

Here are some of the many areas affected.

  • Progressive obesity and skin changes
  • Weight gain and fatty tissue deposits, particularly around the midsection and upper back, in the face (moon face) and between the shoulders (buffalo hump). Some symptoms such as sudden weight gain, are caused by excess cortisol. The excess cortisol in the body does not increase protein and carbohydrate metabolism. It slows or nearly disables metabolism function, which can cause weight gain (fat accumulation) in the buttocks, abdomen, cheeks, neck, or upper back.
  • Loss of muscle mass. Some areas of the body, such as the arms and legs, will remain thin.
  • Pink or purple stretch marks (striae) on the skin of the abdomen, thighs, breasts and arms
  • Thinning, fragile skin that bruises easily
  • Slow healing of cuts, insect bites and infections
  • Acne

Women with Cushing’s syndrome may experience:

  • Thicker or more visible body and facial hair (hirsutism)
  • Irregular or absent menstrual periods

Men with Cushing’s syndrome may experience:

  • Decreased libido
  • Decreased fertility
  • Erectile dysfunction

Other signs and symptoms include:

  • Fatigue
  • Muscle weakness
  • Depression, anxiety and irritability
  • Loss of emotional control
  • Cognitive difficulties
  • New or worsened high blood pressure
  • Glucose intolerance that may lead to diabetes
  • Headache
  • Bone loss, leading to fractures over time
  • Hyperlipidemia (elevated lipids – cholesterol – in the blood stream)
  • Recurrent opportunistic or bacterial infections
Think you have Cushing’s?  Get to a doctor and don’t give up!

MaryO
         MaryO

Filed under: Cancer, Cushing's, Rare Diseases, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Day 1: Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

Posted on April 1, 2026 by MaryO

April is always Cushing’s Awareness Challenge month because Dr. Harvey Cushing was born on April 8th, 1869.

30-posts

Thanks to Robin for this wonderful past logo!  I’ve participated in these 30 days for Cushing’s Awareness several times so I’m not quite sure what is left to say this year but I always want to get the word out when I can.

As I see it, there have been some strides the diagnosis or treatment of Cushing’s since last year.  More drug companies are getting involved, more doctors seem to be willing to test, a bit more awareness, maybe.

April Fool's Day

How fitting that this challenge should begin on April Fool’s Day.  So much of Cushing’s  Syndrome/Disease makes us Cushies seem like we’re the April Fool.  Maybe, just maybe, it’s the doctors who are the April Fools…

Doctors tell us Cushing’s is too rare – you couldn’t possibly have it.  April Fools!

All you have to do is exercise and diet.  You’ll feel better.  April Fools!

Those bruises on your legs?  You’re just clumsy. April Fools!

Sorry you’re growing all that hair on your chin.  That happens as you age, you know.  April Fools!

Did you say you sleep all day?  You’re just lazy.  If you exercised more, you’d have more energy. April Fools!

You don’t have stretch marks.  April Fools!

You have stretch marks but they are the wrong [color/length/direction] April Fools!

The hump on the back of your neck is from your poor posture. April Fools!

Your MRI didn’t show a tumor.  You couldn’t have Cushing’s. April Fools!

This is all in your mind.  Take this prescription for antidepressants and go home.  April Fools!

If you have this one surgery, your life will get back to normal within a few months. April Fools!

What?  You had transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s?  You wasted your time and money. April Fools!

I am the doctor.  I know everything.  Do not try to find out any information online. You could not have Cushing’s.  It’s too rare…  April FOOL!

All this reminds me of a wonderful video a message board member posted a while ago:

So now – who is the April Fool?  It wasn’t me.  Don’t let it be you, either!

Filed under: Cushing's, Diagnostic Testing, Rare Diseases, symptoms, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

« Previous Page