Roundup may cause potentially fatal ‘adrenal insufficiency’

Posted on August 22, 2015 by MaryO

IMPORTANT!  A new study finds that the Roundup herbicide disrupts the hormonal system of rats at low levels at which it’s meant to produce no adverse effects. By the same mechanism It may be causing the potentially fatal condition of ‘adrenal insufficiency’ in humans.

Monsanto’s glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup is an endocrine (hormone) disruptor in adult male rats, a new study shows.

The lowest dose tested of 10 mg/kg bw/d (bodyweight per day) was found to reduce levels of corticosterone, a steroid hormone produced in the adrenal glands. This was only one manifestation of a widespread disruption of adrenal function.

No other toxic effects were seen at that dose, so if endocrine disruption were not being specifically looked for, there would be no other signs that the dose was toxic. However a 2012 study detected a 35% testosterone down-regulation in rats at a concentration of 1 part per million.

In both studies endocrine disruption was detected at the lowest level tested for, so we don’t know if, when it comes to endocrine disruption, there are ‘safe’ lower doses of Roundup. In technical parlance, this means that no NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level), was found.

Significantly, the authors believe that the hormonal disruption could lead to the potentially fatal condition know as ‘adrenal insufficiency’ in humans, which causes fatigue, anorexia, sweating, anxiety, shaking, nausea, heart palpitations and weight loss.

“A progressive increase in its prevalence has been observed in humans, while a very few studies relating to xenobiotic exposure and adrenal insufficiency development have been reported”, they write. The increasing levels of Roundup in the environment and food could be “one of the possible mechanisms of adrenal insufficiency.”

How does this level relate to safety limits set by regulators?

One problem with trying to work out how the endocrine disruptive level of 10 mg/kg bw/d relates to how ‘safe’ levels are set by regulators.

The experiment looked at Roundup, the complete herbicide formulation as sold and used, but regulators only look at the long-term safety of glyphosate alone, the supposed active ingredient of Roundup.

Safe levels for chronic exposure to the Roundup herbicide product have never been tested or assessed for regulatory processes. This is a serious omission because Roundup has been shown in many tests to be more disruptive to hormones than glyphosate alone, thanks to the numerous other ingredients it contains to enhance its weed-killing properties.

Given this yawning data gap, let’s for a moment assume that the regulatory limits set for glyphosate alone can be used as a guide for the safe level of Roundup.

The endocrine disruptive level of Roundup found in the experiment, of 10 mg/kg bw/d, is is well above the acceptable daily intake (ADI) set for glyphosate in Europe (0.3 mg/kg bw/d) and the US (1.75 mg/kg bw/d). But this isn’t a reason to feel reassured, since with endocrine effects, low doses can be more disruptive than higher doses.

Another worrying factor is that 10 mg/kg bw/d is well below the NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) for chronic toxicity of glyphosate: 500 mg/kg bw/d for chronic toxicity, according to the US EPA.

In other words, the level of 500 mg/kg bw/d – a massive 50 times higher than the level of Roundup found to be endocrine disruptive in the experiment – is deemed by US regulators not to cause chronic toxicity.

This experiment shows they are wrong by a long shot. They failed to see toxicity below that level because they failed to take endocrine disruptive effects from low doses into account and industry does not test for them.

Hormone disruption take place at or below ‘no adverse effects’ levels

Interestingly, the NOAEL for glyphosate in industry’s three-generation reproductive studies in rats was much lower than that for chronic toxicity – 30 mg/kg bw/day for adults and 10 mg/kg bw/day for offspring.

However the latter figures – at which no adverse effects should be apparent from glyphosate – are at the same as or higher level than the level of Roundup found to be endocrine disruptive in the new study.

These results therefore show that the reproductive processes of the rats are sensitive to low doses that are apparently not overtly toxic. This in turn suggests that the reproductive toxicity findings are due to endocrine disruptive effects.

Regulatory tests still do not include tests for endocrine disruption from low doses, in spite of the fact that scientists have known about the syndrome since the 1990s.

In the final section of the new study, the researchers discuss its implications. They note that the effects seen in the Roundup-treated rats to the Adrenocorticotropic hormone receptor (ACTH) were similar to adrenal insufficiency in humans:

“The findings that Roundup treatment down regulates endogenous ACTH, is similar to the condition known as adrenal insufficiency in humans. This condition manifests as fatigue, anorexia, sweating, anxiety, shaking, nausea, heart palpitations and weight loss. Chronic adrenal insufficiency could be fatal, if untreated.

“A progressive increase in its prevalence has been observed in humans, while a very few studies relating to xenobiotic exposure and adrenal insufficiency development have been reported. The present study describes one of the possible mechanisms of adrenal insufficiency due to Roundup and suggests more systematic studies, to investigate the area further. “

Claire Robinson of GMWatch commented: “Since no safe dose has been established for Roundup with regard to endocrine disrupting effects, it should be banned.”

 

 

The study: ‘Analysis of endocrine disruption effect of Roundup in adrenal gland of male rats‘ is by Aparamita Pandey and Medhamurthy Rudraiah, and published in Toxicology Reports 2 (2015) pp.1075-1085 on open access.

This article was originally published by GMWatch. This version has been subject to some edits and additions by The Ecologist.

From http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_round_up/2985058/roundup_may_cause_potentially_fatal_adrenal_insufficiency.html

Filed under: adrenal, adrenal crisis, Rare Diseases | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Urinary free cortisol measurement most accurate first-line test for Cushing’s syndrome diagnosis

Posted on August 19, 2015 by MaryO

ufc

 

Ceccato F, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;doi:10.1210/jc.2015-2507.

Measuring 24-hour urinary free cortisol with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry is the most accurate first-line diagnostic tool for diagnosing Cushing’s syndrome in adults, according to research published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Filippo Ceccato, MD, of the University Hospital of Padova, Italy, and colleagues analyzed data from 137 adults from 2012 to 2014 (108 women; mean age, 41 years) with clinical conditions suggestive of hypercortisolism. Within the cohort, 38 had a confirmed diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome (27 women); 99 did not have the diagnosis. In all patients, researchers measured 24-hour urinary free cortisol with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), late-night salivary cortisol with a radio-immunometric method and serum cortisol with a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test. Researchers performed all three tests on patients within 2 weeks to avoid fluctuations in cortisol production.

Researchers found that using LC-MS/MS to measure urinary free cortisol revealed both a combined higher positive ratio (10.7) and a lower negative likelihood ratio (0.03) among the three first-line tests.

For the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test, researchers found a cutoff of 138 nmol/L revealed the best specificity (97%), whereas the 50 nmol/L cutoff confirmed the best sensitivity (100%). For the late-night salivary cortisol test, researchers found a cutoff of 14.46 provided a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 89%. For urinary free cortisol, a cutoff of 170 nmol during 24 hours provided a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 91%.

After using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-contrast analysis to compare the power of each test alone and combined with one another, the urinary free cortisol assay was at least as good as all the other possible combinations, according to researchers.

“This result is rather surprising because some authors have recently advocated replacing [the urinary free cortisol] assay with other tests,” the researchers wrote. “Our findings go against such a hypothesis, probably because we used LC-MS/MS in our routine clinical practice for all patients, meaning that high [urinary free cortisol] concentrations pointed to a high likelihood of [Cushing’s syndrome].”

Researchers also observed higher urinary free cortisol levels in men with Cushing’s syndrome, as well as greater cortisol suppression in the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test in women, but noted that sex did not affect the diagnostic accuracy of tests.

“Choosing between valid tests for ruling out [Cushing’s syndrome] in high-risk populations requires an understanding of their diagnostic performance in different clinical settings,” the researchers wrote. “We recommend measuring [urinary free cortisol] with LC-MS/MS as the first-line screening test for the diagnosis of [Cushing’s syndrome], and then confirming hypercortisolism with the 1-mg [dexamethasone suppression test] or late-night salivary cortisol assay.” – by Regina Schaffer

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.

From http://www.healio.com/endocrinology/adrenal/news/online/%7B1851a57b-4e76-4c5d-ad7e-ef217c2a2336%7D/urinary-free-cortisol-measurement-most-accurate-first-line-test-for-cushings-syndrome-diagnosis

Filed under: Cushing's, Diagnostic Testing | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Cortendo plans tax-fuelled shift to Dublin

Posted on August 6, 2015 by MaryO

Cortendo, a Swedish-American biopharmaceutical company that has invested millions developing treatments for rare conditions such as Cushing’s syndrome, is the latest global drug company to propose a move to Ireland for tax reasons.

The company operates from Pennsylvania, is listed in Norway but is incorporated in Sweden.

In recent days it told its investors it had submitted a prospectus to the Central Bank relating to the establishment of a Dublin-based public limited company.

Cortendo is proposing that the new Dublin company would become the parent of the group, replacing its current Swedish domicile. The Irish company would buy all of the outstanding stock in the current Cortendo parent, paying investors with an issuance of depositary receipts.

Depositary receipts have become popular financial instruments in the biopharma industry, and are typically used by non-US drug companies that want to trade in over-the-counter and traditional US markets.

Cortendo told its shareholders the move to Ireland “will have the effect of facilitating tax-efficient allocations of capital [and] tax-efficient returns of capital to shareholders”.

“Furthermore, the board expects that certain features of Irish company law will enable the Cortendo group to operate more flexibly and efficiently,” the company said.

Cortendo had not yet responded to a request prior to publication for details on what, if any, staff or operations would be shifted to Dublin as part of the move.

The company last month indicated it may seek to list its shares in the United States, although it did not discuss a valuation. It set up its Irish unit in May, according to company filings.

The company focuses on developing drugs to treat rare endocrine diseases, including the potentially fatal Cushing’s and acromegaly, inflammation of the hands and feet that can lead to diabetes.

Its main drugs have not yet been commercialised but it has high hopes for its treatment for Cushing’s , which is at a late stage of development. The company’s latest annual report shows an operating loss of about €8 million.

From http://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/swedish-drug-firm-plans-tax-fuelled-shift-to-dublin-1.2307007

Filed under: Cushing's, Treatments | Tagged: , , | Leave a comment »

Does a Normal Urine Free Cortisol Result Rule out Cushing’s Syndrome?

Posted on August 4, 2015 by MaryO
Endocrine Society’s 97th Annual Meeting and Expo, March 5–8, 2015 – San Diego
SAT-384:
Does a Normal Urine Free Cortisol Result Rule out Cushing’s Syndrome?
Susmeeta T. Sharma1 and Lynnette K Nieman2

  • 1Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • 2National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Presentation Number: SAT-384
Date of Presentation: March 7, 2015
Abstract:Background: Urine free cortisol (UFC) has been traditionally used as one of the first steps in the diagnostic evaluation of Cushing’s syndrome (CS) (1). False positive results, especially values less than twice the upper limit of normal (ULN), can be seen in uncontrolled diabetes, obesity, depression, alcoholism, increased fluid intake, overcollection and stress. False negative results have also been reported with incomplete collection, in mild or cyclic CS and in patients with renal insufficiency (2-3). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of UFC and 24-hour urine 17-hydroxycorticosteroids (17OHCS) in patients with CS.Methods: Retrospective study of all CS patients evaluated at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from 2009 to 2014. Screening tests used for CS included UFC, 17OHCS, late night salivary cortisol (LNSC), midnight serum cortisol and low dose (1mg overnight or 2-day 2mg/day) dexamethasone suppression test (DST). Values above reference range for UFC, 17OHCS and LNSC, a midnight serum cortisol ≥ 7.5 mcg/dL, and post-dexamethasone cortisol values ≥ 1.8 mcg/dL were considered abnormal. Hourly 24-hour sampling for cortisol was performed in a few cases with a mild clinical phenotype and equivocal test results. UFC was measured using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). 17OHCS was measured using colorimetric methodology with Porter-Silber reaction (reported as mg/g of creatinine). Mean of the first two UFC and 17OHCS values (appropriate collection by urine volume and creatinine) obtained within 30 days of initial NIH presentation were used for the purpose of this study.

Results: Seventy-two patients were diagnosed with CS (aged 18-77 years, 51 females). Of these, 51 had Cushing’s disease (CD), 10 had ectopic CS while 2 had an adrenal source of Cushing’s based on pathology. Biochemical tests including inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) suggested ectopic CS but no tumor was found (occult) in 6 patients. IPSS was indicative of a pituitary source in 2 patients with failed transsphenoidal surgery while one patient did not complete evaluation for ACTH-dependent CS. UFC results were available in all, 17OHCS in 70, LNSC in 21, midnight serum cortisol in 68 and DST results in 37 patients. UFC was falsely normal in six and only minimally elevated (< 2 x ULN) in 13 patients (normal renal function, no history of cyclicity, all had CD). Of these 19 patients, 24h 17OHCS was abnormal in all, LNSC was abnormal in 12, midnight serum cortisol was abnormal in 18 and DST was abnormal in 12 patients. Hourly 24-hour sampling for cortisol performed in 3 of these patients revealed abnormal nadir (> 7.5 mcg/dL) and mean daily serum cortisol (> 9 mcg/dL) levels.

Conclusion: UFC can be falsely normal or only minimally elevated in mild CS. Multiple collections and use of complimentary screening tests including 24-hour urine 17OHCS and LNSC can help make a diagnosis and prevent delay in treatment.

(1) Newell-Price J, et al. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2006;367(9522):1605-17.  (2) Alexandraki KI, et al. Is urinary free cortisol of value in the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2011;18:259–63.  (3) Kidambi S, et al. Limitations of nocturnal salivary cortisol and urine free cortisol in the diagnosis of mild Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157(6):725-31

Nothing to Disclose: STS, LKN

Sources of Research Support: This research was in part supported by the intramural research program of NICHD/NIH

Read the entire article at http://press.endocrine.org/doi/abs/10.1210/endo-meetings.2015.ahpaa.9.sat-384

Filed under: adrenal, Clinical trials, Cushing's, pituitary | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

A Single Midnight Serum Cortisol Measurement Distinguishes Cushing’s Syndrome from Pseudo-Cushing States

Posted on August 1, 2015 by MaryO
Dimitris A. Papanicolaou, Jack A. Yanovski, Gordon B. Cutler, Jr. 2 , George P. Chrousos, and Lynnette K. Nieman
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dimitris A. Papanicolaou, M.D., Developmental Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 10N262, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1862, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1862. E-mail: papanicd@cc1.nichd.nih.gov.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jcem.83.4.4733
Received: October 22, 1997
Accepted: January 05, 1998
First Published Online: July 01, 2013
Abstract

Cushing’s syndrome (CS) may be difficult to distinguish from pseudo-Cushing states (PCS) based on physical findings or urinary glucocorticoid excretion. As the lack of diurnal variation in serum cortisol is characteristic of CS, we studied whether diurnal cortisol determinations could discriminate CS from PCS. Two hundred and sixty-three patients were evaluated: 240 had CS, and 23 had PCS. Urine was collected for 24 h for measurement of cortisol and 17-hydroxycorticosteroids (17OHCS). Blood was drawn at 2300, 2330, 0000, 0030, and 0100 h and at 0600, 0630, 0700, 0730, and 0800 h the next morning for serum cortisol determination. The main outcome measure was the sensitivity of these parameters for the diagnosis of CS at 100% specificity. A midnight cortisol value greater than 7.5 μg/dL correctly identified 225 of 234 patients with CS and all PCS patients. This sensitivity (96%) was superior to that obtained for any other measure, including urinary cortisol (45%), 17OHCS (22%), any other individual cortisol time point (10–92%), the morning (23%) or the evening (93%) cortisol mean, and the ratio (11%) of morning to evening values. We conclude that at 100% specificity, a single serum cortisol value above 7.5 μg/dL at midnight discriminates CS from PCS with higher sensitivity than 24-h urinary cortisol or 17OHCS, or other individual or combined measures of serum cortisol.

OVERPRODUCTION of cortisol is the biochemical hallmark of Cushing’s syndrome (CS) regardless of its etiology and is evidenced by increased urinary cortisol excretion, and a decrease in the circadian variation of serum cortisol (1).

Pseudo-Cushing states (PCS), as the name implies, share many of the features of Cushing’s syndrome, including cortisol overproduction. The hypercortisolism of PCS is hypothesized to be caused by increased activity of the CRH neuron, which, in turn, stimulates ACTH production and release (2). PCS are a heterogeneous group of disorders, including chronic alcoholism and alcohol withdrawal syndrome (3, 4), major depression (5), poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (6, 7), and obesity (8). Additionally, transient hypercortisolism may be associated with less obvious psychiatric conditions (e.g. anxiety) in patients with clinical features reminiscent of CS, such as obesity and hypertension, which are common in the general population. The substantial overlap in urinary free cortisol (UFC) excretion and clinical features between some patients with CS and those with PCS can make it difficult to distinguish between the two conditions (9). Thus, although persistent elevation of 24-h UFC in the presence of unequivocal signs of CS (particularly classic moon facies, prominent centripetal obesity, severe proximal muscle weakness, and violaceous striae) suggest the diagnosis of CS, patients with less obvious signs pose a diagnostic dilemma.

Several tests have been proposed to diagnose CS, including 24-h UFC measurements, the 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST) (10), the 2-day DST (1), and the dexamethasone-CRH (Dex-CRH) stimulation test (8). Each has drawbacks. Twenty-four-hour urinary collections are inconvenient and often incomplete. The 1-mg overnight DST is commonly used as a screening test to exclude the diagnosis of CS. This test has two caveats. First, a criterion for the level of serum cortisol suppression to exclude CS has not been developed using modern RIAs. Second, although the test has a false negative rate of only 2%, it has a significant false positive rate, especially in chronically ill (23%) or obese patients (13%) (11) and in patients with major depression (43%) or other psychiatric disorders (8–41%) (12). Even in normal individuals, the test may be consistent with CS in up to 30% (9).

Similarly, the 2-mg 2-day DST, often used as a confirmatory diagnostic test, has a diagnostic accuracy of only 71% (8). An additional problem is the variable metabolic clearance of dexamethasone (13), which is especially problematic in patients receiving medications that induce the cytochrome P450-related enzymes (e.g.phenytoin, rifampin, and phenobarbital) (14) or in patients with renal or hepatic failure. In such cases, neither DST gives reliable results. Finally, the drawbacks of 24-h urine collections apply to the DST as well.

We previously determined that the dexamethasone-CRH test has a diagnostic accuracy of 98% in the distinction of CS from PCS (8, 15). However, although accurate, this test has the drawbacks related to dexamethasone clearance, as discussed above.

Physiological cortisol secretion is characterized by circadian rhythmicity. Serum cortisol concentration reaches its zenith in the morning (0600–0800 h) and its nadir in the night during the first half of normal sleep. Krieger et al. defined the normal circadian rhythm of plasma corticosteroid levels as the pattern where all plasma glucocorticoid levels from 1600–2400 h were 75% or less of the 0800 h value (16). As previous studies have found that obese individuals retain a normal circadian cortisol rhythm (17), we hypothesized that differences in circadian plasma cortisol values would distinguish CS from PCS. To test this hypothesis, we prospectively measured serum cortisol values during the normal nadir and zenith periods in patients being evaluated for CS.

Read the entire study at http://press.endocrine.org/doi/10.1210/jcem.83.4.4733?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dpubmed

Filed under: Cushing's, Diagnostic Testing | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »