Ectopic Cushing’s Syndrome From a Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone-Secreting Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: a Rare Pitfall af Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling

Abstract

Summary

This case report describes a rare presentation of ectopic Cushing’s syndrome (CS) due to ectopic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) production from a medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).

The patient, a 69-year-old man, presented with symptoms of muscle weakness, facial plethora, and easy bruising.

An inferior petrosal sinus sampling test (IPSS) demonstrated pituitary adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) secretion, but a whole-body somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT) revealed enhanced uptake in the right thyroid lobe which, in addition to a grossly elevated serum calcitonin level, was indicative of an MTC. A 18F-DOPA PET/CT scan supported the diagnosis, and histology confirmed the presence of MTC with perinodal growth and regional lymph node metastasis.

On immunohistochemical analysis, the tumor cell stained positively for calcitonin and CRH but negatively for ACTH. Distinctly elevated plasma CRH levels were documented. The patient therefore underwent thyroidectomy and bilateral adrenalectomy.

This case shows that CS caused by ectopic CRH secretion may masquerade as CS due to a false positive IPSS test. It also highlights the importance of considering rare causes of CS when diagnostic test results are ambiguous.

Learning points

  • Medullary thyroid carcinoma may secrete CRH and cause ectopic CS.
  • Ectopic CRH secretion entails a rare pitfall of inferior petrosal sinus sampling yielding a false positive test.
  • Plasma CRH measurements can be useful in selected cases.

Background

The common denominator of Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is autonomous hypersecretion of cortisol (1) and it is subdivided into ACTH-dependent and ACTH-independent causes. The majority of CS cases are ACTH-dependent (80–85%) with a pituitary corticotroph tumor as the most prevalent cause (Cushing’s disease), and less frequently an ectopic ACTH-producing tumor (2). The gold standard method to ascertain the source of ACTH secretion in CS patients is inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) with measurement of plasma ACTH levels in response to systemic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation (3). The IPSS has a very high sensitivity and specificity of 88–100% and 67–100%, respectively (4), but pitfalls do exist, including the rare ectopic CRH-producing tumor, which may yield a false positive test result (3). Here, we describe a very rare case masquerading as CS including a positive IPSS test.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old man presented at a local hospital with a 6-month history of progressive fatigue, muscle weakness and wasting, easy bruising, facial plethora, and fluid retention. His serum potassium level was 2.6 mmol/L (reference range: 3.5–4.2 mmol/L) without a history of diuretics use. His previous medical history included spinal stenosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and hypertension. An electromyography showed no sign of polyneuropathy and an echocardiography showed no signs of heart failure with an ejection fraction of 55%. MRI of the spine revealed multiple compression fractures, and the patient underwent spinal fusion and decompression surgery; during this admission he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c: 55 mmol/mol). After spine surgery, the patient developed a pulmonary embolism and initiated treatment with rivaroxaban.

Establishing the diagnosis of ACTH-dependent CS

Six months after his spine surgery, the patient was referred to the regional department of endocrinology for osteoporosis management. Blood tests revealed a low serum testosterone level with non-elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (Table 1). An overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test was positive with a morning cortisol level of 254 nmol/L and three consecutive 24-h urinary cortisol levels were markedly elevated with mean level of ≈600 nmol/24 h (reference range: 12–150 nmol/24 h). A single plasma ACTH was 37 ng/L (Table 1).

Table 1Baseline endocrine assessment.

Parameters Patient’s values Reference range
ACTH, ng/L 37 7–64
UFC, nmol/day 588 12–150
Urinary cortisol, nmol/L 600 171–536
OD, nmol/L 254 <50
Free testosterone, nmol/L 0.061 0.17–0.59
HbA1c, mmol/mol 55 <48
FSH, IU/L 7.4 1.2–15.8
LH, IU/L 2.2 1.7–8.6

ACTH, adrenocorticotropin; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; IU, international units; LH, luteinizing hormone; OD, plasma cortisol levels after a 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test; UFC, urine free cortisol hormone.

Differential diagnostic tests

The patient was referred to a tertiary center for further examinations. Ketoconazole treatment was started to alleviate the consequences of hypercortisolism. A pituitary MRI revealed an intrasellar microtumor with a maximal diameter of 6 mm and an IPSS was ordered. A whole-body somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT) was also performed to evaluate the presence of a potential neuroendocrine tumor. This revealed multiple areas of enhanced uptake including the right thyroid lobe and cervical lymph nodes in the neck (with CT correlates), as well as in the duodenum (with no CT correlate). Concomitantly, a grossly elevated serum calcitonin level of 528 pmol/L (reference range <2.79 pmol/L) was measured.

Subsequently, the IPSS revealed pituitary ACTH secretion with a central-to-peripheral ACTH ratio >3 (Table 2). The right petrosal sinus was not successfully catheterized; thus, lateralization could not be determined.

To corroborate the diagnosis MTC, a 18F-DOPA PET/CT scan (FDOPA) was performed (5), which showed pathologically enhanced uptake in the right thyroid lobe and regional lymph nodes (Fig. 1). An ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy from the thyroid nodule was inconclusive; however, the patient underwent total thyroidectomy and regional lymph node resection, from which histology confirmed the diagnosis of disseminated MTC. Standard replacement with levothyroxine, calcium, and vitamin D was initiated. A blood sample was collected, and genomic DNA was extracted. The DNA analysis for RET germline mutation was negative.

Figure 1View Full Size
Figure 1
18F-DOPA PET/CT scan with pathologically enhanced uptake in the right thyroid lobe (large blue arrow on the left side) and regional lymph nodes (small blue arrows).

Citation: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports 2023, 3; 10.1530/EDM-23-0057

Table 2Results from the inferior petrosal sinus sampling.*

Time (min) Left IPSS Peripheral L/P
-5 42 36 1.2
-1 116 33 3.5
2 120 32 3.8
5 209 28 7.5
7 180 43 4.2
10 529 34 15.6
15 431 37 11.6

*Data represents ACTH levels in ng/L. IPSS Inferior petrosal sampling ACTH Adrenocorticotropin hormone CRH Corticotropin-releasing hormone, L/P Ratio of left (L) inferior petrosal sinus to peripheral venous ACTH concentrations.

Pathology

Total thyroidectomy and bilateral cervical lymph node dissection (level six and seven) were performed. Macroscopic evaluation of the right thyroid lobe revealed a 24 mm, irregular solid yellow tumor. Microscopically the tumor showed an infiltrating architecture with pseudofollicles and confluent solid areas. Calcification was prominent, but no amyloid deposition was seen. The tumor cells were pleomorphic with irregular nuclei and heterogenic chromatin structure. No mitotic activity or necrosis was observed. On immunohistochemical analysis, the tumor cells expressed thyroid transcription factor 1 and stained strongly for carcinoembryonic antigen and calcitonin; tumor cells were focally positive for cytokeratin 19. The tumor was completely negative for ACTH, thyroid peroxidase, and the Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 antigen. Further analysis revealed positive immunostaining for CRH (Fig. 2). The Ki-67 index was very low (0–1%), indicating a low cellular proliferation. Molecular testing for somatic RET mutation was not performed.

Figure 2View Full Size
Figure 2
Histopathological findings and immunohistochemical studies of MTC. (A) Microscopic features of medullary thyroid carcinoma. (B) Polygonal tumor cells (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40). (C) Tumor cells stain for calcitonin (×20). (D) Immunohistochemical stain (×400) for CRH showing cells being positive (brown). (E) Pituitary tissue from healthy control staining positive for ACTH in comparison to (F) ACTH-negative cells MTC tissue from the patient (×20).

Citation: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports 2023, 3; 10.1530/EDM-23-0057

No malignancy was found in the left thyroid lobe and there was no evidence of C-cell hyperplasia. Regional lymph node metastasis was found in 13 out of 15 nodes with extranodal extension.

Outcome and follow-up

Follow-up

Serum calcitonin levels declined after neck surgery but remained grossly elevated (118 pmol/L 3 weeks post surgery) and cortisol levels remained high. Ketoconazole treatment was poorly tolerated and not sufficiently effective. Plasma levels of CRH were measured by a competitive-ELISA kit (EKX-KIZI6R-96 Nordic BioSite), according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The intra- and interassay %CV (coefficient of variability) were below 8% and 10%, respectively, and the assay sensitivity was 1.4 pg/mL. The plasma CRH was distinctly elevated compared to in-house healthy controls both before and after thyroid surgery (Fig. 3).

Figure 3View Full Size
Figure 3
Plasma CRH levels before and after total thyroidectomy compared to three healthy controls.

Citation: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports 2023, 3; 10.1530/EDM-23-0057

The patient subsequently underwent uneventful bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy followed by standard replacement therapy with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone. The symptoms and signs of his CS gradually subsided. Pathology revealed bilateral cortical hyperplasia as expected.

The patient continues follow-up at the Department of Oncology and the Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine. At 13-month follow-up, 68Ga-DOTATOC shows residual disease with pathologically enhanced uptake in two lymph nodes, whereas the previously described focal DOTATOC uptake in the duodenum was less pronounced (still no CT correlate). Serum calcitonin was 93 pmol/L at the 13-month follow-up.

Discussion

Diagnostic challenges remain in the distinction between pituitary and ectopic ACTH-dependent CS, and several diagnostic tools are used in combination, none of which is infallible, including IPSS (6). Our case and others illustrate that ectopic CRH secretion may yield a false positive IPSS test result (3). Measurement of circulating CRH levels is relevant if an ectopic CRH producing tumor is suspected, but the assay is not routinely available in clinical practice (Lynnette K Nieman M. Measurement of ACTH, CRH, and other hypothalamic and pituitary peptides https://www.uptodate.com/contents/measurement-of-acth-crh-and-other-hypothalamic-and-pituitary-peptides: UpToDate; 2019). In our case, the presence of elevated plasma CRH levels after thyroidectomy strengthened the indication for bilateral adrenalectomy.

The most common neoplasm causing ectopic CS is small-cell lung cancer, whereas MTC accounts for 2–8% of ectopic cases (7). The development of CS in relation to MTC is generally associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis of an otherwise relatively indolent cancer (8), and the clinical progression of CS is usually rapid, why an early recognition and rapid control of hypercortisolemia and MTC is necessary to decrease morbidity and mortality (79). Our case does have residual disease; however, he remains progression-free with stable and relatively low calcitonin levels within 1-year follow-up.

Only a very limited number of cases of ectopic tumors with either combined ACTH and CRH secretion or isolated CRH secretion have been reported, with ectopic CRH secretion accounting for less than 1% of CS (9).

An ACTH- or CRH-producing tumor can be difficult to localize and may include gastric ACTH/CRH-secreting neuroendocrine tumors (9). In our case, the 68Ga-DOTATOC identified a possible duodenal site, in addition to the MTC, but an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed no pathological findings and there was no CT correlate. Thus, we concluded that the most likely and sole source of ectopic CRH was the MTC and its metastases.

To our knowledge, no official guidelines for managing ectopic ACTH-dependent CS have been established. In a recent publication by Alba et al. (10), the authors demonstrated a clinical algorithm (The Mount Sinai Clinical Pathway, MSCP) and recommendation for the management of CS due to ectopic ACTH secretion.

Essentially, our approach in this particular case followed these recommendations, including source location by CT and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging, acute management with ketoconazole, and finally, bilateral adrenalectomy as curative MTC surgery was not possible. In retrospect, performance of the IPSS could be questioned in view of the MTC diagnosis. In real time, however, a pituitary MRI performed early in the diagnostic process revealed a microadenoma, which prompted the IPSS. In parallel, a somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT) was also done, which raised the suspicion of an MTC.

Conclusion

We report a very rare case of an ectopic CS caused by a CRH-secreting MTC. Although IPSS has stood the test of time in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent CS, this case illustrates a rare pitfall.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

Patient consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details was obtained from the patient.

Author contribution statement

JOJ and MJO are the physicians responsible for the patient. LR performed the thyroidectomy and bilateral adrenalectomy. SHM and SLA assessed and reassessed the histopathology and the immunohistochemical analysis. MB measured plasma CRH. VM, JOJ, and MJO drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to critical revision of the manuscript.

References

Minimally Invasive Approaches Lead to High Remission Rates in Children

Minimally invasive diagnostic methods and transnasal surgery may lead to remission in nearly all children with Cushing’s disease, while avoiding more aggressive approaches such as radiation or removal of the adrenal glands, a study shows.

The study, “A personal series of 100 children operated for Cushing’s disease (CD): optimizing minimally invasive diagnosis and transnasal surgery to achieve nearly 100% remission including reoperations,” was published in the Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism.

Normally, the pituitary produces adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), which stimulates the adrenal glands to produce cortisol. When a patient has a pituitary tumor, that indirectly leads to high levels of cortisol, leading to development of Cushing’s disease (CD).

In transnasal surgery (TNS), a surgeon goes through the nose using an endoscope to remove a pituitary tumor. The approach is the first-choice treatment for children with Cushing’s disease due to ACTH-secreting adenomas — or tumors — in the pituitary gland.

Micro-adenomas, defined as less than 4 mm, are more common in children and need surgical expertise for removal. It is necessary to determine the exact location of the tumor before conducting the surgery.

Additionally, many surgeons perform radiotherapy or bilateral adrenalectomy (removal of both adrenal glands) after the surgery. However, these options are not ideal as they can be detrimental to children who need to re-establish normal growth and development patterns.

Dieter K. Lüdecke, a surgeon from Germany’s University of Hamburg, has been able to achieve nearly 100% remission while minimizing the need for pituitary radiation or bilateral adrenalectomy. In this study, researchers looked at how these high remission rates can be achieved while minimizing radiotherapy or bilateral adrenalectomy.

Researchers analyzed 100 patients with pediatric CD who had been referred to Lüdecke for surgery from 1980-2009. Data was published in two separate series — series 1, which covers patients from 1980-1995, and series 2, which covers 1996-2009. All the surgeries employed direct TNS.

Diagnostic methods for CD have improved significantly over the past 30 years. Advanced endocrine diagnostic investigations, such as testing for levels of salivary cortisol in the late evening and cortisol-releasing hormone tests, have made a diagnosis of CD less invasive. This is particularly important for excluding children with obesity alone from children with obesity and CD. Methods to determine the precise location of micro-adenomas have also improved.

The initial methodology to localize tumors was known as inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS), an invasive procedure in which ACTH levels are sampled from the veins that drain the pituitary gland.

In series 1, IPSS was performed in 24% of patients, among which 46% were found to have the wrong tumor location. Therefore, IPSS was deemed invasive, risky, and unreliable for this purpose.

All adenomas were removed with extensive pituitary exploration. Two patients in series 1 underwent early repeat surgery; all were successful.

Lüdecke introduced intraoperative cavernous sinus sampling (CSS), an improved way to predict location of adenomas. This was found to be very helpful in highly select cases and could also be done preoperatively for very small adenomas.

In series 2, CSS was used in only 15% of patients thanks to improved MRI and endocrinology tests. All patients who underwent CSS had correct localization of their tumors, indicating its superiority over IPSS.

In series 2, three patients underwent repeat TNS, which was successful. In these recurrences, TNS minimized the need for irradiation. The side effects of TNS were minimal. Recurrence rate in series 1 was 16% and 11% in series 2.

While Lüdecke’s patients achieved a remission rate of 98%, other studies show cure rates of 45-69%. Only 4% of patients in these two series received radiation therapy.

“Minimally invasive unilateral, microsurgical TNS is important functionally for both the nose and pituitary,” the researchers concluded. “Including early re-operations, a 98% remission rate could be achieved and the high risk of pituitary function loss with radiotherapy could be avoided.”

From https://cushingsdiseasenews.com/2018/09/04/minimally-invasive-methods-yield-high-remission-in-cushings-disease-children/

New ACTH Detection Method Improves Cure Rates in Cushing’s Disease Patients

Researchers have identified a new, quick method for detecting ACTH-producing tumors – called Elecsys – that can improve the cure rates of Cushing’s disease patients undergoing surgery.

The study, “Long-term outcomes of tissue-based ACTH-antibody assay–guided transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas in Cushing disease,” was published in the Journal of Neurosurgery.

Transsphenoidal resection (TSR) – a surgical procedure performed through the nose and sphenoid sinus to remove a pituitary tumor – has been the method of choice for treatment for Cushing’s disease.

However, it often fails to localize the tumor with precision, leading to an incomplete resection (removal). This is likely a result of the preoperative methods used to guide surgeons before surgery, which include both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a minimally invasive procedure called bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) that measures ACTH in the veins that drain the pituitary gland.

However, both “suffer from suboptimal sensitivity and thus allow for incomplete resections, specially if pathological frozen sections fail to identify tumor,” researchers wrote.

MRI, for example, detects only 50 percent of Cushing’s adenomas, limiting surgeons’ ability to conduct curative TSR surgeries. Therefore, better diagnostic and tumor localization techniques are needed to increase the likelihood that initial surgeries can remove the entire tumor and cure patients.

A team of researchers at Yale School of Medicine evaluated a new method for guiding tumor localization during TSR. The method – a double-antibody sandwich assay for ACTH – is performed in the operating room in resected pituitary samples from patients. ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) is a hormone produced in the pituitary gland in the brain, that simulated cortisol production in the adrenal glands. In patients with Cushing disease the pituitary gland releases too much ACTH.

In the new method – called Elecsys – samples are squeezed between sandwich-like system composed of two antibodies that recognize two sections of the ACTH protein. The three-step procedure is quick, allowing doctors to analyze samples in the operating room and determine if they have removed the entire tumors.

The performance and outcomes associated with the Elecsys were assessed by reviewing data of tissue samples from 14 patients with ACTH-secreting adenomas, who underwent TSR surgeries between 2009 and 2014.

“The intraoperative TSR protocol was modified with the introduction of the ACTH assay such that if either the assay or the frozen-section pathology returned results positive for tumor, that area of the gland was resected,” the researchers explained.

The new ACTH method detected tumor tissue and was capable of distinguishing it from normal tissue with a 95% sensitivity and 71.3% specificity. These values are comparable to those using the standard method for tumor localization, which requires frozen sections of the tumor. This suggests that the test can be used either in conjunction with or in place of frozen sections.

Also, 85.7% of the patients achieved long-term disease remission, with the remission rate exceeding the rate with previous methods (71.9%).

Overall, “these preliminary findings reflect the promising potential of tissue-based ACTH-antibody-guided assay for improving the cure rates of Cushing’s disease patients undergoing TSR. Further studies with larger sample sizes, further refinements of assay interpretation, and longer-term follow-ups are needed,” the study concluded.

From https://cushingsdiseasenews.com/2017/10/19/acth-detection-method-improved-cure-rates-cushings-disease-study-shows/

Interview with Doc Karen, Pituitary Patient and Cushing’s Advocate

Karen’s Story

Life was good! In fact, life was great! I was married to the love of my life. We had a beautiful little girl. My husband and I had both earned our graduate degrees. I earned my Doctorate in Clinical Psychology and was growing my clinical practice. I loved my work!

In October, 2006, my life was turned upside down when I gained 30 pounds in 30 days! I knew this was not normal at all. I sought answers but my doctor kept insisting that I wasn’t eating the right foods, that I wasn’t exercising hard enough, and finally that it was genetic. However, I was always a thin person, I ate pretty healthy foods, and I was pretty active. Red flags became even greater when my physician put me on prescription weight loss drugs and I STILL gained another 30 pounds. I knew my body and I knew something was wrong but I had no one to validate what was going on.

In January, 2010, to my surprise, I learned that I was miraculously pregnant with our second daughter. I was so sick during that pregnancy and,  again, my doctors couldn’t figure out why. My OBGYN was very supportive, yet so concerned. Her solution was to put me on bed rest. I became so ill that she told me that “my only job was to sit still and wait to have a baby”. I did give birth to a healthy baby girl four weeks early. Little did I know, then, how much of a miracle she was.

During the latter part of my pregnancy, while flipping through channels on television, I came across a Cushing’s episode on the health TV show, “Mystery Diagnosis”.

I knew right away that this diagnosis fit everything I had been experiencing: years of weird and unexplained symptoms, gaining 150 pounds for no reason, an onset of diabetes, high blood pressure, and an overall sense of doom.

You see, my friends and family witnessed me go from a vibrant young Clinical Psychologist in practice, to someone whose health deteriorated due to the symptoms of Cushing’s, as I tried for many years to get answers from professionals. As I continued to eat a healthy, 1000 calorie per day diet, engage in exercise with multiple personal trainers, and follow through with referrals to consult with dietitians; I continued to gain weight at a rate of 5 pounds per week and experience rapidly declining health. Finally, after watching that Cushing’s episode of Mystery Diagnosis, I found my answer! Ultimately, I sought the expertise of and treatment from a team of experts at the Seattle Pituitary Center in Seattle, WA. I had brain surgery in Seattle on November 16th, 2011. I want to tell you how I found the people who helped save my life…

On June 9, 2011, I went to my first MAGIC conference. I had never heard of them but someone on one of the online support groups told me about it.  At that time, I was working but was very, very sick. We suspected at that time that I had been sick for years! My local endocrinologist was far from a Cushing’s expert. After watching the Cushing’s episode of Mystery Diagnosis, I told the same endocrinologist who had misdiagnosed me for years that I had found my answer. He swore that there was “literally no possible way that I had Cushing’s Disease!” He stated that my “hump wasn’t big enough”, “my stretch marks were not purple enough” and that “Cushing’s patients do not have children!” I told him that I was NOT leaving his office until he started testing me. He finally caved in. To his surprise, I was getting abnormal labs back.

At that time, there was evidence of a pit tumor but it wasn’t showing up on an MRI. So, I had my IPSS scheduled. An IPSS stands for Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling. It is done because 60 % of Cushing’s based pituitary tumors are so small that they do not show up on an MRI. Non Cushing’s experts do not know this so they often blow patients off, even after the labs show a high level of ACTH in the brain through blood work. An overproduction of the hormone ACTH from the pituitary communicates to the adrenal glands to overproduce cortisol. Well, the IPSS procedure is where they put catheters up through your groin through your body up into your head to draw samples to basically see which side of your pituitary the extra hormone is coming from, thus indicating where the tumor is. U of C is the only place in IL that does it.

So, back to the MAGIC convention; my husband and I went to this conference looking for answers. We were so confused and scared!  Everyone, and I mean everyone, welcomed us with opened arms like we were family! There were brilliant presenters there, including an endocrinologist named Dr. William Ludlam. At that time, he was the director at the Seattle Pituitary Center in Seattle, WA. He is a true Cushing’s expert. Since then, he left in January, 2012 to have a significant impact toward the contribution of research of those impacted by Cushing’s Syndrome. His position was taken over by another brilliant endocrinologist, Dr. Frances Broyles.

I was scheduled to get an IPSS at U of C on June 28th, 2011 to locate the tumor. Two days after the IPSS, I began having spontaneous blackouts and ended up in the hospital for 6 days. The docs out here had no clue what was happening and I was having between 4-7 blackouts a day! My life was in danger and they were not helping me! We don’t know why, but the IPSS triggered something! But, no one wanted to be accountable so they told me the passing out, which I was not doing before, was all in my head being triggered by psychological issues. They did run many tests. But, they were all the wrong tests. I say all the time; it’s like going into Subway and ordering a turkey sandwich and giving them money and getting a tuna sandwich. You would be mad! What if they told you, “We gave you a sandwich!” Even if they were to give you a dozen sandwiches; if it wasn’t turkey, it wouldn’t be the right one. This is how I feel about these tests that they ran and said were all “normal”. The doctors kept telling us that they ran all of these tests so they could cover themselves. Yet, they were not looking at the right things, even though, I (the patient) kept telling them that this was an endocrine issue and had something to do with my tumor! Well, guess how good God is?!!!!

You see, Dr. Ludlam had given me his business card at the conference, which took place two weeks prior to the IPSS. I put it away for a while. But, something kept telling me to pull the card out and contact him. I am crying just thinking about it, Lord!

So, prior to my IPSS, I wrote Dr. Ludlam an e mail asking him some questions. At that time, he told me to send him ALL of my records including labs. I sent him 80 pages of records that day.  He called me back stating that he concurred with all of the evidence that I definitely have Cushing’s Disease from a pituitary source. He asked me what I planned to do and I told him that I was having the IPSS procedure done in a few days at the University of Chicago. He told me once I got my results to contact him.

Fast forward, I ended up in the hospital with these blackouts after my IPSS. The doctors, including MY local endocrinologist told me there was no medical evidence for my blackouts. In fact, he told the entire treatment team that he even doubted if I even had a tumor! However, this is the same man who referred me for the IPSS in the first place! I was literally dying and no one was helping me! We reached out to Dr. Ludlam in Seattle and told him of the situation. He told me he knew exactly what was going on. For some reason, there was a change in my brain tumor activity that happened after my IPSS. No one, to this day, has been able to answer the question as to whether the IPSS caused the change in tumor activity. The tumor, for some reason, began shutting itself on and off. When it would shut off, my cortisol would drop and would put me in a state of adrenal insufficiency, causing these blackouts!

Dr. Ludlam said as soon as we were discharged, we needed to fly out to Seattle so that he could help me! The hospital discharged me in worse condition then when I came in. I had a blackout an hour after discharge! But get this…The DAY the hospital sent me home saying that I did not have a pit tumor, my IPSS results were waiting for me! EVIDENCE OF TUMOR ON THE LEFT SIDE OF MY PITUITARY GLAND!!!

Two days later, Craig and I were on a plane to Seattle. I had never in my life been to Seattle, nor did I ever think I would go. We saw the man that God used to save my life, Dr. William Ludlam, the same man who we had met at the MAGIC conference for the first time one month prior! He put me on a combo of medications that would pull me out of crisis. Within one month, my blackouts had almost completely stopped! Unfortunately, we knew this was a temporary fix! He was treating me to carry me over to surgery. You see, his neurosurgeon, Dr. Marc Mayberg was just as amazing. He is one of the top neurosurgeons in the US! Statistically, he has one of the highest success rates!

The problem was that our insurance refused to pay for surgery with an expert outside of IL, stating that I could have surgery anywhere in IL! Most people don’t know that pituitary surgeries are very complicated and need the expertise of a “high volume center” which is where they do at least 50 of these surgeries per year. Dr. Mayberg has performed over 5,000 of these surgeries!  By this time, we had learned that we need to fight for the best care! It was what would give me the best chance at life! We thought I would have to wait until January when our insurance would change, to see if I could get the surgery I so desperately needed! I was holding on by a thread!

We began appealing our insurance. At the time the MAGIC foundation had an insurance specialist who was allowed to help us fight our insurance. Her name is Melissa Callahan and she took it upon herself to fight for us as our patient advocate. It was a long and hard battle! But…we finally WON!!!! On November 16th, 2011, Dr. Marc Mayberg found that hidden tumor on the left side of my pituitary gland! He removed the tumor along with 50% of my pituitary gland.

Recovery was a difficult process. They say that it takes about one full year to recover after pituitary surgery for Cushing’s. I was grateful to be in remission, nonetheless. However, about one year after my brain surgery, the Cushing’s symptoms returned. After seven more months of testing that confirmed a recurrence of the Cushing’s, I was cleared for a more aggressive surgery. This time, I had both of my adrenal glands removed as a last resort. By then, we had learned that I had hyperplasia, which is an explosion of tumor cells in my pituitary. It only takes one active cell to cause Cushing’s. Therefore, I could have potentially had several more brain surgeries and the disease would have kept coming back over and over.

As a last resort, my adrenal glands were removed so that no matter how much these cells try to cause my adrenals to produce excessive amounts of cortisol; the glands are not there to receive the message. As a result, I am Adrenally Insufficient for life, which means that my body cannot produce the life sustaining hormone, cortisol, at all. I had my Bilateral Adrenalectomy by world renowned BLA surgeon, Dr. Manfred Chiang, in Wisconsin on August 21st, 2013. I traded Cushing’s Disease for Addison’s Disease, one of the hardest decisions I have ever had to make in my life. However, I knew that I would die with Cushing’s. Recovery from my last surgery was difficult and involved weaning down to a maintenance dose of steroid to replace my cortisol. Now, on a maintenance dose; I still have to take extra cortisol during times of physical or emotional stress to prevent my body from going into shock.

I promised a long time ago that I would pay it forward…give back because so much has been given to me. This is why I have committed my life to supporting the Cushing’s community. I post videos on YouTube as a way of increasing awareness. My channel can be found at http://www.YouTube.com/drnkarenthames

Additionally, I am working on a Cushing’s documentary. Please like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/Hug.A.Cushie

Thank you for taking the time to read my story!

Karen has made 2 videos about her experiences with Cushing’s:

and

Doc Karen will be our guest in an interview on BlogTalk Radio  Friday December 2 at 11:00 AM eastern.  The Call-In number for questions or comments is (323) 642-1665 .

The archived interview will be available through iTunes Podcasts (Cushie Chats) or BlogTalkRadio.  While you’re waiting, there are currently 90 other past interviews to listen to!