Day 1: Cushing’s Awareness Challenge

April is always Cushing’s Awareness Challenge month because Dr. Harvey Cushing was born on April 8th, 1869.

30-posts

Thanks to Robin for this wonderful past logo!  I’ve participated in these 30 days for Cushing’s Awareness several times so I’m not quite sure what is left to say this year but I always want to get the word out when I can.

As I see it, there have been some strides the diagnosis or treatment of Cushing’s since last year.  More drug companies are getting involved, more doctors seem to be willing to test, a bit more awareness, maybe.


April Fool's Day

How fitting that this challenge should begin on April Fool’s Day.  So much of Cushing’s  Syndrome/Disease makes us Cushies seem like we’re the April Fool.  Maybe, just maybe, it’s the doctors who are the April Fools…

Doctors tell us Cushing’s is too rare – you couldn’t possibly have it.  April Fools!

All you have to do is exercise and diet.  You’ll feel better.  April Fools!

Those bruises on your legs?  You’re just clumsy. April Fools!

Sorry you’re growing all that hair on your chin.  That happens as you age, you know.  April Fools!

Did you say you sleep all day?  You’re just lazy.  If you exercised more, you’d have more energy. April Fools!

You don’t have stretch marks.  April Fools!

You have stretch marks but they are the wrong [color/length/direction] April Fools!

The hump on the back of your neck is from your poor posture. April Fools!

Your MRI didn’t show a tumor.  You couldn’t have Cushing’s. April Fools!

This is all in your mind.  Take this prescription for antidepressants and go home.  April Fools!

If you have this one surgery, your life will get back to normal within a few months. April Fools!

What?  You had transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s?  You wasted your time and money. April Fools!

I am the doctor.  I know everything.  Do not try to find out any information online. You could not have Cushing’s.  It’s too rare…  April FOOL!

All this reminds me of a wonderful video a message board member posted a while ago:

So now – who is the April Fool?  It wasn’t me.  Don’t let it be you, either!

Violaceous Abdominal Striae Noted on Physical Examination: A Clue to the Diagnosis of Cushing’s Syndrome

This article costs $70 to buy :(  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2024-259687

Doctors should suspect Cushing’s syndrome when they see patients with purple stretch marks and metabolic conditions such as diabetes, even if those symptoms aren’t the reasons for a medical visit, physicians in Japan wrote in a case study describing how they reached that diagnosis for a woman in her early 30s.

Severe Osteoporosis in a Young Man with Bilateral Cushing’s Syndrome

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is challenging; however, through the clinical picture and the search for secondary causes of osteoporosis, it was possible to reach the diagnosis of the case reported. There was an independent, symptomatic ACTH hypercortisolism manifested by typical phenotypic changes, severe secondary osteoporosis and arterial hypertension in a young patient.

Case presentation

A 20-year-old Brazilian man with low back pain for 8 months. Radiographs showed fragility fractures in the thoracolumbar spine, and bone densitometry showed osteoporosis, especially when evaluating the Z Score (− 5.6 in the lumbar spine). On physical examination, there were wide violaceous streaks on the upper limbs and abdomen, plethora and fat increase in the temporal facial region, hump, ecchymosis on limbs, hypotrophy of arms and thighs, central obesity and kyphoscoliosis. His blood pressure was 150 × 90 mmHg. Cortisol after 1 mg of dexamethasone (24.1 µg/dL) and after Liddle 1 (28 µg/dL) were not suppressed, despite normal cortisoluria. Tomography showed bilateral adrenal nodules with more severe characteristics. Unfortunately, through the catheterization of adrenal veins, it was not possible to differentiate the nodules due to the achievement of cortisol levels that exceeded the upper limit of the dilution method. Among the hypotheses for the differential diagnosis of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia are primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia, McCune–Albright syndrome and isolated bilateral primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia or associated with Carney’s complex. In this case, primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia or carcinoma became important etiological hypotheses when comparing the epidemiology in a young man and the clinical-laboratory-imaging findings of the differential diagnoses. After 6 months of drug inhibition of steroidogenesis, blood pressure control and anti-osteoporotic therapy, the levels and deleterious metabolic effects of hypercortisolism, which could also impair adrenalectomy in the short and long term, were reduced. Left adrenalectomy was chosen, given the possibility of malignancy in a young patient and to avoid unnecessary definitive surgical adrenal insufficiency if the adrenalectomy was bilateral. Anatomopathology of the left gland revealed expansion of the zona fasciculate with multiple nonencapsulated nodules.

Conclusion

The early identification of Cushing’s syndrome, with measures based on the assessment of risks and benefits, remains the best way to prevent its progression and reduce the morbidity of the condition. Despite the unavailability of genetic analysis for a precise etiological definition, it is possible to take efficient measures to avoid future damage.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cushing’s syndrome may be exogenous or endogenous and, in this case, can be ACTH-dependent or independent. In the case reported, there was an independent, symptomatic ACTH hypercortisolism manifested by typical phenotypic changes, severe secondary osteoporosis and arterial hypertension in a young patient. Osteoporosis secondary to hypercortisolism occurs due to chronic reduction in bone formation, loss of osteocytes and increased reabsorption caused by intense binding of cortisol to glucocorticoid receptors present in bone cells [1]. In addition, excess cortisol impairs vitamin D metabolism and reduces endogenous parathyroid hormone secretion, intestinal calcium reabsorption, growth hormone release, and lean body mass [2]. Subclinical Cushing disease occurs in up to 11% of individuals diagnosed with early-onset osteoporosis and 0.5–1% of hypertension patients. [3] A cross-sectional study published in 2023 revealed a prevalence of 81.5% bone loss in 19 patients with Cushing’s syndrome [2]. The prevalence of osteopenia ranges from 60 to 80%, and the prevalence of osteoporosis ranges from 30 to 65% in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Additionally, the incidence of fragility fractures ranges from 30 to 50% in these patients [4] and is considered the main cause of morbidity affecting the quality of life. The diagnosis is challenging, given the presence of confounding factors; however, through the clinical picture and the search for secondary causes of osteoporosis, it was possible to reach a syndromic diagnosis. Early identification of this syndrome, with measures based on the assessment of risks and benefits, remains the best way to prevent progression and reduce morbidity related to this disease [2].

Case presentation

A 20-year-old Brazilian male patient reported low back pain that had evolved for 8 months, with no related trauma. He sought emergency care and performed spinal radiographs on this occasion (03/2019). Due to the several alterations observed in the images, he was referred to the Orthopedics Service of the Hospital of Federal University of Juiz de Fora, which prescribed orthopedic braces, indicated physical therapy and was referred again to the Osteometabolic Diseases outpatient clinic of the Endocrinology and Rheumatology Services of the Hospital of Federal University of Juiz de Fora on 10/2019.

The radiographs showed a marked reduction in the density of bone structures, scoliotic deviation with convexity toward the left and reduction in the height of the lumbar vertebrae, with partial collapses of the vertebral bodies at the level of T12, L1, L2, L3 and L5, with recent collapses in T12 and L1, suggesting bone fragility fractures. The same can be seen in posterior magnetic resonance imaging (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

figure 1

Radiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of lumbosacral spine in profile

Bone scintigraphy on 08/2019 did not reveal hyper flow or anomalous hyperemia in the topography of the thoracolumbar spine, and in the later images of the exam, there was a greater relative uptake of the tracer in the lumbar spine (vertebrae T10–T12, L2–L4), of nonspecific aspect, questioning the presence of osteoarticular processes or ankylosing spondylitis.

It was also observed in the bone densitometry requested in October 2019, performed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), low bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total femur, when comparing the results to evaluating the Z Score (Table 1).

Table 1 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Thus, the diagnosis of osteoporosis was established, and treatment with vitamin D 7000 IU per week was started due to vitamin D3 insufficiency associated with the bisphosphonate alendronate 70 mg, also weekly. The patient had a past pathological history of fully treated syphilis (2018) and perianal condyloma with a surgical resection on 09/2017 and 02/2018. In the family history, it was reported that a maternal uncle died of systemic sclerosis. In the social context, the young person denied drinking alcohol and previous or current smoking.

On physical examination, there were no lentiginous skin areas or blue nevi; however, wide violet streaks were observed on the upper limbs and abdomen, with plethora and increased fat in the temporal facial region and hump (Fig. 2a, b), limb ecchymosis, hypotrophy of the arms and thighs, central obesity and kyphoscoliosis. Systemic blood pressure (sitting) was 150 × 90 mmHg, BMI was 26.09 kg/m2, and waist circumference was 99 cm, with no reported reduction in height, maintained at 1.55 m.

Fig. 2

figure 2

Changes in the physical examination. a Violet streaks on the upper limbs, b Violet streaks on abdomen

An investigation of secondary causes for osteoporosis was initiated, with the following laboratory test results (Table 2).

Table 2 Laboratory tests

Computed tomography of the abdomen with adrenal protocol performed on 08/13/2020 characterized isodense nodular formation in the body of the left adrenal and in the lateral portion of the right adrenal, measuring 1.5 cm and 0.6 cm, respectively. The lesions had attenuation of approximately 30 HU, showing enhancement by intravenous contrast, with an indeterminate washout pattern in the late phase after contrast (< 60%) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

figure 3

Computed tomography abdomen with adrenal protocol

After contact with the interventional radiology of the Hospital of Federal University of Juiz de Fora, catheterization of adrenal veins was performed on 10/2020; however, it was not possible to perform adequate lesion characterization due to obtaining serum cortisol levels that extrapolated the dilutional upper limit of the method (Table 3).

Table 3 Adrenal catheterization

The calculation of the selectivity index was 6.63 (Reference Value (RV) > 3), confirming the good positioning of the catheter within the vessels during the procedure. The calculated lateralization index was 1.1296 (VR < 3), denoting bilateral hormone production. However, as aldosterone was not collected from a peripheral vein, it was not possible to obtain the contralateral rate and define whether there was contralateral suppression of aldosterone production [5].

Due to pending diagnoses for a better therapeutic decision and Cushing’s syndrome in clear evolution and causing organic damage, it was decided, after catheterization, to make changes in the patient’s drug prescription. Ketoconazole 400 mg per day was started, the dose of vitamin D was increased to 14,000 IU per week, and ramipril 5 mg per day was prescribed due to secondary hypertension. In addition, given the severity of osteoporosis, it was decided to replace previously prescribed alendronate with zoledronic acid.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen was performed on 06/19/2021, which demonstrated lobulated nodular thickening in the left adrenal gland with areas of decreased signal intensity in the T1 out-phase sequence, denoting the presence of fat, and homogeneous enhancement using contrast, measuring approximately 1.7 × 1.5 × 1.3 cm, suggestive of an adenoma. There was also a small nodular thickening in the lateral arm of the right adrenal, measuring approximately 0.8 × 0.6 cm, which was difficult to characterize due to its small dimensions and nonspecific appearance.

PPNAD or carcinoma became an important etiological hypothesis for the case described when comparing the epidemiology in a young man and the clinical-laboratory-imaging findings of the differential diagnoses. According to a dialog with the patient and family, the group of experts opted for unilateral glandular surgical resection on the left side (11/11/2021), where more significant changes were visualized, as there was a possibility of malignancy in a young patient and to avoid a definitive adrenal insufficiency condition because of bilateral adrenalectomy. This would first allow the analysis of the material and follow-up of the evolution of the condition with the permanence of the contralateral gland.

In the macroscopic analysis of the adrenalectomy specimen, adrenal tissue weighing 20 g and measuring 9.3 × 5.5 × 2.0 cm was described, completely surrounded by adipose tissue. The gland has a multinodular surface and varies between 0.2 and 1.6 cm in thickness, showing a cortex of 0.1 cm in thickness and a medulla of 1.5 cm in thickness (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

figure 4

Left adrenal

The microscopic analysis described the expansion of the zona fasciculate, with the formation of multiple nonencapsulated nodules composed of polygonal cells with ample and eosinophilic cytoplasm and frequent depletion of intracytoplasmic lipid content. No areas of necrosis or mitotic activity were observed. The histopathological picture is suggestive of cortical pigmented micronodular hyperplasia of the adrenal gland.

For the final etiological definition and an indication of contralateral adrenalectomy, which could be unnecessary and would avoid chronic corticosteroid therapy, or else, it would be necessary to protect the patient from future complications with the maintenance of the disease in the right adrenal gland, it would be essential to search for mutations in the PRKAR1A, PDE11A, PDE8B and PRKACA genes [15]; however, such genetic analysis is not yet widely available, and the impossibility of carrying it out at the local level did not allow a complete conclusion of the case.

Discussion

Through the clinical picture presented and the research of several secondary causes for osteoporosis, it was possible to arrive at the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome [6]. There was symptomatic independent ACTH hypercortisolism, manifested by typical phenotypic changes, severe secondary osteoporosis, and arterial hypertension in a young patient.

The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is always challenging, given the presence of confounding factors such as the following:

  • Physiological states of hypercortisolism—pseudo Cushing (strenuous exercise, pregnancy, uncontrolled diabetes, sleep apnea, chronic pain, alcohol withdrawal, psychiatric disorders, stress, obesity, glucocorticoid resistance syndromes);
  • Cyclic or mild—subclinical Cushing’s pictures;
  • Frequent and, even unknown, short- and long-term use of corticosteroids under different presentations;
  • Increase in the general population incidence of diabetes and obesity;
  • Screening tests with singularities for collection and individualized for different patient profiles.

It is important to note that the basal morning cortisol measurement is not the ideal test to assess hypercortisolism and is better applied to the assessment of adrenal insufficiency. However, the hypercortisolism of the case was unequivocal, and this test was also shown to be altered several times. As no test is 100% accurate, the current guidelines suggest the use of at least two first-line functional tests that focus on different aspects of the pathophysiology of the hypothalamic‒pituitary‒adrenal axis to confirm the hypercortisolism state: 24-hours cortisol, nocturnal salivary cortisol, morning serum cortisol after suppression with 1 mg of dexamethasone or after Liddle 1. Given that night-time salivary cortisol would require hospitalization, the other suggested tests were chosen, which are easier to perform in this context [78].

Subsequently, tests were performed to determine the cause of hypercortisolism, such as serum ACTH levels and adrenal CT. The suppressed ACTH denoted the independence of its action. CT showed bilateral adrenal nodules with more severe features: solid lesion, attenuation > 10 UI on noncontrast images, and contrast washout speed < 60% in 10 minutes. In this case, it is essential to make a broad clinical decision and dialog with the patient to weigh and understand the risks and benefits of surgical treatment [9].

Among the main diagnostic hypotheses for the differential diagnosis of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia are primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia, McCune–Albright syndrome (MAS) and bilateral primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia (PPNAD) isolated or associated with Carney’s complex. Another possibility would be bilateral adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent macronodular hyperplasia secondary to long-term adrenal stimulation in patients with Cushing’s disease (ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor) or ectopic ACTH production, but the present case did not present with ACTH elevation.

Primary macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (nodules > 1 cm) predominates in women aged 50–60 years and may also be detected in early childhood (before 5 years) in the context of McCune–Albright syndrome. Most cases are considered sporadic; however, there are now several reports of familial cases whose presentation suggests autosomal dominant transmission. Several pathogenic molecular causes were identified in the table, indicating that it is a heterogeneous disease [10]. The pathophysiology occurs through the expression of anomalous ectopic hormone receptors or amplified eutopic receptors in the adrenals. It usually manifests in an insidious and subclinical way, with cortisol secretion mediated through receptors for gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), vasopressin (ADH), catecholamines, interleukin 1 (IL-1), leptin, luteinizing hormone (LH), serotonin or others. Nodular development is not always synchronous or multiple; thus, hypercortisolism only manifests when there is a considerable increase in the number of adrenocortical cells, with severe steroidogenesis observed by cortisoluria greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. Patients with mild Cushing’s syndrome should undergo screening protocols to identify aberrant receptors, as this may alter the therapeutic strategy. If there is evidence of abnormal receptors, treatment with beta-blockers is suggested for patients with beta-adrenergic receptors or with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (and sex steroid replacement) for patients with LH/hCG receptors. In patients in whom aberrant hormone receptors are not present or for whom no specific pharmacological blockade is available or effective, the definitive treatment is bilateral adrenalectomy, which is known to make the patient dependent on chronic corticosteroid therapy [11]. Studies have shown the effectiveness of unilateral surgery in the medium and long term, opting for the resection of the adrenal gland of greater volume and nodularity by CT, regardless of the values obtained by catheterization of adrenal veins, but with the possibility of persistence or recurrence in the contralateral gland. Another possibility would be total unilateral adrenalectomy associated with subtotal contralateral adrenalectomy [12].

In McCune–Albright syndrome (MAS), there are activating mutations in the G-protein GNAS1 gene, generating autonomic hyperfunction of several tissues, endocrine or not, and there may be, for example, a constant stimulus similar to ACTH on the adrenal gland. In this case, pituitary levels of ACTH are suppressed, and adrenal adenomas with Cushing’s syndrome appear. Hypercortisolism may occur as an isolated manifestation of the syndrome or be associated with the triad composed of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, café au lait spots with irregular borders and gonadal hyperfunction with peripheral precocious puberty. The natural history of Cushing’s syndrome in McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS) is heterogeneous, with some children evolving with spontaneous resolution of hypercortisolism, while others have a more severe condition, eventually requiring bilateral adrenalectomy [13].

PPNAD predominates in females, in people younger than 30 years, multiple and small (< 6 mm) bilateral pigmented nodules (surrounded by atrophied cortex), which can reach 1.5 cm in adulthood, with family genetic inheritance (66%) or sporadic inheritance (33%), and as part of the Carney complex reported in 40% of cases. In 70% of cases, inactivating mutations are identified in the PKA regulatory 1-alpha subunit (PRKAR1A), a tumor suppressor gene [14]. Osteoporosis is often associated with this condition [15]. One test that can distinguish patients with PPNAD from other primary adrenocortical lesions is cortisoluria after sequential suppression with low- and high-dose dexamethasone. In contrast to most patients with primary adrenocortical disease, who demonstrate no change in urinary cortisol, 70% of PPNAD patients have a paradoxical increase in urinary cortisol excretion [16]. The treatment of choice for PPNAD is bilateral adrenalectomy due to the high recurrence rate for primary adrenal disease [17].

Carney complex is a multiple neoplastic syndrome with autosomal dominant transmission, characterized by freckle-like cutaneous hyperpigmentation (lentiginosis), endocrine tumors [(PPNAD), testicular and/or thyroid tumors and acromegaly] and nonendocrine tumors, including cutaneous, cardiac, mammary, and osteochondral myxomas, among others. In the above case, the transthoracic echocardiogram of the patient on 03/18/2021 showed cavities of normal dimensions, preserved systolic and diastolic functions, no valve changes and no lentiginous skin areas and blue nevi, making the diagnosis of the syndrome less likely. The definitive diagnosis of Carney requires two or more main manifestations. Several related clinical components may suggest the diagnosis but not define it. The diagnosis can also be made if a key criterion is present and a first-degree relative has Carney or an inactivating mutation of the gene encoding PRKAR1A [18].

The adenoma is usually small in size (< 3 cm), similar to the nodules in this case; however, it is usually unilateral, with an insidious and mild evolution, especially in adult women over 35 years of age, producing only 1 steroid class. Carcinomas are usually large (> 6 cm), and only 10% are bilateral. They should be suspected mainly when the tumor presents with hypercortisolism associated with hyperandrogenism. They have a bimodal age distribution, with peaks in childhood and adolescence, as well as at the end of life [3].

Conclusion

Early identification of Cushing’s syndrome, with measures based on the assessment of risks and benefits, remains the best way to prevent progression and reduce morbidity [2]. After 6 months of drug inhibition of steroidogenesis, blood pressure control and anti-osteoporotic therapy, the objective was to minimize the levels and deleterious metabolic effects of hypercortisolism, which could also harm the surgical procedure in the short and long term through infections, dehiscence, nonimmediate bed mobilization and cardiovascular events. Unilateral adrenalectomy was chosen, given the possibility of malignancy in a young patient and to avoid definitive surgical adrenal insufficiency if the adrenalectomy was bilateral. Despite the unavailability of genetic analysis for a precise etiological definition, it is possible to take efficient measures to avoid unnecessary consequences or damage.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional file 1]. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the link https://ufjfedubr-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/barbara_reis_ufjf_edu_br/EVpIR005sPZGlQvMJhIwSaUB0Hig4KOjhkG4D4cMggUwHA?e=Dk8tng.

Abbreviations

ACTH:
Adrenocorticotropic hormone
PPNAD:
Bilateral primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia
DXA:
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
GIP:
Gastric inhibitory peptide
GnRH:
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone
IL-1:
Interleukin 1
BMD:
Low bone mineral density
LH:
Luteinizing hormone
MAS:
McCune–Albright syndrome
PRKAR1A:
PKA regulatory 1-alpha subunit
ADH:
Vasopressin

References

  1. Pedro AO, Plapler PG, Szejnfeld VL. Manual brasileiro de osteoporose: orientações práticas para os profissionais de saúde. 1st ed. São Paulo: Editora Clannad; 2021. ISBN 978-65-89832-00-3.

  2. Naguib R, Elkemary EZ, Elsharkawi KM. The severity of bone loss: a comparison between Cushing’s disease and Cushing’s syndrome. J Endocrinol Metab. 2023;13(1):33–8. https://doi.org/10.14740/jem857.

    Article Google Scholar

  3. Vilar L, et al. Endocrinologia Clínica. 6th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2016.

    Google Scholar

  4. Wang D, Dang CX, Hao YX, Yu X, Liu PF, Li JS. Relationship between osteoporosis and Cushing syndrome based on bioinformatics. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(43): e31283.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Williams TA, Reincke M. Management of Endocrine Disease: diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism: the Endocrine Society guideline 2016 revisited. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179(1):R19–29. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0990.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N, National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), et al. UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. Nieman LK. Diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome in the modern era. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2018;47(2):259–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2018.02.001.

    Article Google Scholar

  8. Herr K, Muglia VF, Koff WJ, Westphalen AC. Imaging of the adrenal gland lesions. Radiol Bras. 2014;47(4):228–39. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1762.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  9. Hsiao HP, Kirschner LS, Bourdeau I, Keil MF, Boikos SA, Verma S, et al. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity, overlap with other tumor syndromes, and atypical glucocorticoid hormone secretion in adrenocorticotropin-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia compared with other adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2930–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-0516.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  10. Mircescu H, Jilwan J, N’Diaye N, et al. Are ectopic or abnormal membrane hormone receptors frequently present in adrenal Cushing’s syndrome? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(10):3531–6. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.10.6865.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Miller BS, Auchus RJ. Evaluation and treatment of patients with hypercortisolism: a review. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(12):1152–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3280.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Haddad NG, Eugster EA. Peripheral precocious puberty including congenital adrenal hyperplasia: causes, consequences, management and outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;33(3):101273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2019.04.007.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Bonnet-Serrano F, Bertherat J. Genetics of tumors of the adrenal cortex. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018;25(3):R131–52. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-17-0361.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Carney JA, Young WF Jr. Primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease and its associated conditions. Endocrinologist. 1992;2:6.

    Article Google Scholar

  15. Stratakis CA, Sarlis N, Kirschner LS, Carney JA, Doppman JL, Nieman LK, et al. Paradoxical response to dexamethasone in the diagnosis of primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(8):585–91. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-131-8-199910190-00006.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Powell AC, Stratakis CA, Patronas NJ, Steinberg SM, Batista D, Alexander HR, et al. Operative management of Cushing syndrome secondary to micronodular adrenal hyperplasia. Surgery. 2008;143(6):750–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.022.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Almeida MQ, Stratakis CA. Carney complex and other conditions associated with micronodular adrenal hyperplasias. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24(6):907–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2010.10.006.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  18. Hannah-Shmouni F, Stratakis CA. A gene-based classification of primary adrenocortical hyperplasias. Horm Metab Res. 2020;52(3):133–41. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1107-2972.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Serviço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Bárbara Oliveira Reis, Christianne Toledo Sousa Leal, Danielle Guedes Andrade Ezequiel, Ana Carmen dos Santos Ribeiro Simões Juliano, Flávia Lopes de Macedo Veloso, Leila Marcia da Silva, Lize Vargas Ferreira, Mariana Ferreira & Gabriel Zeferino De Oliveira Souza

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the conception and design of the work and have approved the submitted version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bárbara Oliveira Reis.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Surgical removal of adrenal gland.

Researchers Report Rare Case of Cushing’s Caused by Bilateral Adrenal Tumors

Cases of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-independent Cushing’s syndrome are often caused by unilateral tumors in the adrenal glands, but Indian researchers have now reported a rare case where the condition was caused by tumors in both adrenal glands.

Fewer than 40 cases of bilateral tumors have been reported so far, but an accurate diagnosis is critical for adequate and prompt treatment. Sampling the veins draining the adrenal glands may be a good way to diagnose the condition, researchers said.

The study, “Bilateral adrenocortical adenomas causing adrenocorticotropic hormone-independent Cushing’s syndrome: A case report and review of the literature,” was published in the World Journal of Clinical Cases.

Cushing’s syndrome, a condition characterized by excess cortisol in circulation, can be divided into two main forms, depending on ACTH status. Some patients have tumors that increase the amount of ACTH in the body, and this hormone will act on the adrenal glands to produce cortisol in excess. Others have tumors in the adrenal glands, which produce excess cortisol by themselves, without requiring ACTH activation. This is known as ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome.

Among the latter, the disease is mostly caused by unilateral tumors — in one adrenal gland only —  with cases of bilateral tumors being extremely rare in this population.

Now, researchers reported the case of a 31-year-old Indian woman who developed ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome because of tumors in both adrenal glands.

The patient complained of weight gain, red face, moon face, bruising, and menstrual irregularity for the past two years. She recently had been diagnosed with high blood pressure and had started treatment the month prior to the presentation.

A physical examination confirmed obesity in her torso, moon face, buffalo hump, thin skin, excessive hair growth, acne, swollen legs and feet, and skin striae on her abdomen, arms, and legs.

Laboratory examinations showed that the woman had an impaired tolerance to glucose, excess insulin, and elevated cortisol in both the blood and urine. Consistent with features of Cushing’s syndrome, cortisol levels had no circadian rhythm and were non-responsive to a dexamethasone test, which in normal circumstances lowers cortisol production.

Because ACTH levels were within normal levels, researchers suspected an adrenal tumor, which led them to conduct imaging scans.

An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed adrenal adenomas in both adrenal glands (right: 3.1 cm × 2.0 cm × 1.9 cm; left: 2.2 cm × 1.9 cm × 2.1 cm). A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed that the pituitary gland (which normally produces ACTH) was normal.

To determine whether both adrenal tumors were producing cortisol, researchers sampled the adrenal veins and compared their cortisol levels to those of peripheral veins. They found that the left adrenal gland was producing higher amounts of cortisol, thought the right adrenal gland was also producing cortisol in excess.

“Our case indicates that adrenal vein [blood] sampling might be useful for obtaining differential diagnoses” in cases of Cushing’s syndrome, researchers stated. Also, they may help design a surgical plan that makes much more sense.”

The tumors were surgically removed — first the left, and three months later the right — which alleviated many of her symptoms. She also started prednisolone treatment, which helped resolve many disease symptoms.

“Bilateral cortisol-secreting tumors are a rare cause of Cushing’s syndrome,” researchers said. So when patients present bilateral adrenal lesions, “it is crucial to make a definitive diagnosis before operation since various treatments are prescribed for different causes,” they said.

The team recommends that in such cases the two tumors should not be removed at the same time, as this approach may cause adrenal insufficiency and the need for glucocorticoid replacement therapy.

From https://cushingsdiseasenews.com/2019/06/27/rare-case-of-cs-due-to-bilateral-tumors-in-the-adrenal-glands/

Cushing’s and Hairy Nipples

Hairy nipples are a common condition in women. The amount of hair on the nipples varies, but some women find that the hair becomes long, coarse, and dark, which can be distressing.

Hairy nipples are rarely a cause for concern and are usually not a sign of any underlying health issues. However, occasionally they can signify something more serious, in which case, it is essential to consult a doctor.

Almost every part of a person’s skin is covered in hair and hair follicles. On certain parts of the body, such as the top of the head, the hair usually grows longer and thicker, while on other parts, it is thin and transparent.

Fast facts on hairy nipples:

  • It is not known how common hairy nipples are or how many women have them.
  • Many women do not report the condition and instead manage it themselves.
  • It is possible for hair that used to be fine and light to turn coarse and dark with age.

Causes of hairy nipples in women

There are several underlying reasons that might cause nipple hairs to grow. These are:

Cushing’s syndrome

Cushing’s syndrome is another condition caused by hormonal imbalance. When it occurs, there is an excess of cortisol in the body. In this case, a person may experience several symptoms, such as:

  • increased hair growth
  • abnormal menstrual periods
  • high blood pressure
  • a buildup of fat on the chest and tummy, while arms and legs remain slim
  • a buildup of fat on the back of the neck and shoulders
  • a rounded and red, puffy face
  • bruising easily
  • big purple stretch marks
  • weakness in the upper arms and thighs
  • low libido
  • problems with fertility
  • mood swings
  • depression
  • high blood glucose level

Cushing’s syndrome is fairly rare, and the cause is usually associated with taking glucocorticosteroid medicine, rather than the body overproducing the hormone on its own.

It is possible, however, that a tumor in the lung, pituitary gland, or adrenal gland is the cause.

Also:

Hormonal changes and fluctuations

Hormonal changes in women can cause many different symptoms, one of which is changes in nipple hair growth and color.

Some common hormonal changes happen during pregnancy and menopause.

However, hormonal changes can also occur when a woman is in her 20s and 30s, which may cause nipple hair to change appearance or become noticeable for the first time.

Overproduction of male hormones

It is possible for hormonal imbalances to cause hairy nipples. Overproduction of male hormones, including testosterone, can cause hair growth, while other symptoms include:

  • oily skin that can lead to breakouts and acne
  • menstrual periods stopping
  • increase in skeletal muscle mass
  • male pattern baldness, leading to a woman losing hair on her head

If overproduction of male hormones is suspected, it is a good idea to make an appointment with a doctor who can confirm this with a simple test.

Polycystic ovary syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) occurs because of a hormonal imbalance. PCOS is a condition that affects the way the ovaries work.

Common symptoms of PCOS are:

  • infertility
  • irregular menstrual periods
  • ovarian cysts
  • excessive hair growth in unusual places, such as the nipples

PCOS is believed to affect around 1 in 5 women.

Medication

The side effects of particular medicines can cause unusual hair growth.

Medicines, such as testosterone, glucocorticosteroids, and certain other immunotherapy drugs may cause hairy nipples.

What are the treatment options?

Treatment for hairy nipples is not usually necessary for health reasons.

However, many women with the condition prefer to try and reduce or get rid of the appearance of hair on their nipples for cosmetic purposes.

There are several methods by which they can try and do this:

Trimming the nipple hair

Trimming the nipple hair may be enough to reduce its appearance. Small nail scissors are ideal, and hair can be cut close to the skin. It is essential to do this carefully and avoid catching the skin.

Trimming will need to be carried out regularly when the hair grows back.

Tweezing the nipple hair

Tweezing nipple hair is an effective way to get rid of unwanted nipple hair. However, this option can be painful as the skin around the nipple area is particularly soft and sensitive.

It is also important to bear in mind that the hair will return, and tweezing the hair increases the risk of infection and ingrown hairs.

Shaving the nipple hair

Shaving is another option to reduce the appearance of nipple hair. However, it is advisable to do so with caution to avoid nicking the sensitive skin.

This option also carries an increased risk of developing ingrown hairs and infection.

Waxing

Sugaring or waxing is a good hair removal option, though either one is likely to be painful. A salon is the best place to get this treatment type, as doing this at home may cause damage to the skin. Infection and ingrown hairs are again a risk.

Laser hair removal

These popular treatments can help to reduce the hair growth and slow or even prevent regrowth for a while. However, they can be painful, too.

Laser treatment is by far the most expensive option, as it will need to be performed by a plastic surgeon or cosmetic dermatologist.

Hormonal treatment

If a hormonal imbalance is the cause of hairy nipples, a doctor may prescribe or adjust a woman’s medication therapy to restore a healthy hormonal balance.

Other treatments and how to choose

The above treatments are all commonly used to remove and reduce nipple hair and usually have minimal side effects.

Bleaching or using hair removal cream to treat the condition, however, is not advised as these methods are usually too harsh for this sensitive area and may cause irritation and damage.

At what point should you see a doctor?

Hairy nipples in women are quite common, and there is usually no need to see a doctor. However, if they are accompanied by any other unusual symptoms, it is a good idea to make an appointment.

A doctor will be able to perform tests to determine whether an underlying cause, such as PCOS, is causing the growth of nipple hair. If so, they will give advice and medication therapy to help manage the condition.

A doctor will also be able to advise how to remove nipple hair safely.

Takeaway

For the majority of women, nipple hair may seem unsightly, but it is not a cause for any concerns about their health.

However, because some medical conditions can cause nipple hair to darken and grow, it is important to see a doctor if any other symptoms are experienced.

Nipple hair can usually be easily treated and managed, should a woman choose to try to remove the hair for cosmetic reasons.

Adapted from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320835.php