Think Like a Doctor: Red Herrings Solved!

Posted on January 11, 2026 by MaryO

By LISA SANDERS, M.D.

On Thursday we challenged Well readers to take the case of a 29-year-old woman with an injured groin, a swollen foot and other abnormalities. Many of you found it as challenging as the doctors who saw her. I asked for the right test as well as the right diagnosis. More than 200 answers were posted.

The right test was…

The dexamethasone suppression test,though I counted those of you who suggested measuring the cortisol in the urine.

The right diagnosis was…

Cushing’s disease

More than a dozen of you got the right answer or the right test, but Dr. Davin Quinn, a consultant psychiatrist at the University of New Mexico Hospital, was the first to be right on both counts. As soon as he saw that the patient’s cortisol level was increased, he thought of Cushing’s. And he had treated a young patient like this one some years ago as a second year resident.

The Diagnosis:

Cushing’s disease is caused by having too much of the stress hormone cortisol in the body. Cortisol is made in the adrenal glands, little pyramid shaped organs that sit atop the kidneys. It is normally a very tightly regulated hormone that helps the body respond to physical stress.

Sometimes the excess comes from a tumor in the adrenal gland itself that causes the little organ to go into overdrive, making too much cortisol. More often the excess occurs when a tumor in the pituitary gland in the brain results in too much ACTH, the hormone that controls the adrenal gland.

In the body, cortisol’s most fundamental job is to make sure we have enough glucose around to get the body’s work done. To that end, the hormone drives appetite, so that enough fuel is taken in through the food we eat. When needed, it can break muscle down into glucose. This essential function accounts for the most common symptoms of cortisol excess: hyperglycemia, weight gain and muscle wasting. However, cortisol has many functions in the body, and so an excess of the hormone can manifest itself in many different ways.

Cushing’s was first described by Dr. Harvey Cushing, a surgeon often considered the father of modern neurosurgery. In a case report in 1912, he described a 23-year-old woman with sudden weight gain, mostly in the abdomen; stretch marks from skin too thin and delicate to accommodate the excess girth; easy bruising; high blood pressure and diabetes.

Dr. Cushing’s case was, it turns out, a classic presentation of the illness. It wasn’t until 20 years later that he recognized that the disease had two forms. When it is a primary problem of an adrenal gland gone wild and producing too much cortisol on its own, the disease is known as Cushing’s syndrome. When the problem results from an overgrown part of the pituitary making too much ACTH and causing the completely normal adrenal glands to overproduce the hormone, the illness is called Cushing’s disease.

It was an important distinction, since the treatment often requires a surgical resection of the body part where the problem originates. Cushing’s syndrome can also be caused by steroid-containing medications, which are frequently used to treat certain pulmonary and autoimmune diseases.

How the Diagnosis Was Made:

After the young woman got her lab results from Dr. Becky Miller, the hematologist she had been referred to after seeing several other specialists, the patient started reading up on the abnormalities that had been found. And based on what she found on the Internet, she had an idea of what was going on with her body.

“I think I have Cushing’s disease,” the patient told her endocrinologist when she saw him again a few weeks later.

The patient laid out her argument. In Cushing’s, the body puts out too much cortisol, one of the fight-or-flight stress hormones. That would explain her high blood pressure. Just about everyone with Cushing’s disease has high blood pressure.

She had other symptoms of Cushing’s, too. She bruised easily. And she’d been waking up crazy early in the morning for the past year or so – around 4:30 – and couldn’t get back to sleep. She’d heard that too much cortisol could cause that as well. She was losing muscle mass – she used to have well-defined muscles in her thighs and calves. Not any more. Her belly – it wasn’t huge, but it was a lot bigger than it had been. Cushing’s seemed the obvious diagnosis.

The doctor was skeptical. He had seen Cushing’s before, and this patient didn’t match the typical pattern. She was the right age for Cushing’s and she had high blood pressure, but nothing else seemed to fit. She wasn’t obese. Indeed, she was tall (5- foot-10) and slim (150 pounds) and athletic looking. She didn’t have stretch marks; she didn’t have diabetes. She said she bruised easily, but the endocrinologist saw no bruises on exam. Her ankle was still swollen, and Cushing’s can do that, but so can lots of other diseases.

The blood tests that Dr. Miller ordered measuring the patient’s ACTH and cortisol levels were suggestive of the disease, but many common problems — depression, alcohol use, eating disorders — can cause the same result. Still, it was worth taking the next step: a dexamethasone suppression test.

Testing, Then Treatment:

The dexamethasone suppression test depends on a natural negative feedback loop whereby high levels of cortisol suppress further secretion of the hormone. Dexamethasone is an artificial form of cortisol. Given in high doses, it will cause the level of naturally-occurring cortisol to drop dramatically.

The patient was told to take the dexamethasone pills the night before having her blood tested. The doctor called her the next day.

“Are you sure you took the pills I gave you last night?” the endocrinologist asked her over the phone. The doctor’s voice sounded a little sharp to the young woman, tinged with a hint of accusation.

“Of course I took them,” she responded, trying to keep her voice clear of any irritation.

“Well, the results are crazy,” he told her and proposed she take another test: a 24-hour urine test.

Because cortisol is eliminated through the kidneys, collecting a full day’s urine would show how much cortisol her body was making. So the patient carefully collected a day’s worth of urine.

A few days later, the endocrinologist called again: her cortisol level was shockingly high. She was right, the doctor conceded, she really did have Cushing’s.

An M.R.I. scan revealed a tiny tumor on her pituitary. A couple of months later, she had surgery to remove the affected part of the gland.

After recovering from the surgery, the patient’s blood pressure returned to normal, as did her red blood cell count and her persistently swollen ankle. And she was able to once again sleep through the night.

Red Herrings Everywhere:

As many readers noted, there were lots of findings that didn’t really add up in this case. Was this woman’s groin sprain part of the Cushing’s? What about the lower extremity swelling, and the excess red blood cell count?

In the medical literature, there is a single case report of high red blood cell counts as the presenting symptom in a patient with Cushing’s. And with this patient, the problem resolved after her surgery – so maybe they were linked.

And what about the weird bone marrow biopsy? The gastritis? The enlarged spleen? It’s hard to say for certain if any of these problems was a result of the excess cortisol or if she just happened to have other medical problems.

Why the patient didn’t have the typical symptoms of Cushing’s is easier to explain. She was very early in the course of the disease when she got her diagnosis. Most patients are diagnosed once symptoms have become more prominent

By the time this patient had her surgery, a couple of months later, the round face and belly characteristic of cortisol excess were present. Now, two years after her surgery, none of the symptoms remain.

From http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/17/think-like-a-doctor-red-herrings-solved/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Filed under: adrenal, Cushing's, pituitary | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

On Becoming Empowered

Posted on January 1, 2026 by MaryO

This is kind of a “cheat” post since it’s a compilation of other posts, web pages, message board posts and some original thoughts.  

For all of my early life, I was the good, compliant, patient.  I took whatever pills the doctor prescribed, did whatever tests h/she (most always a he) wrote for.  Believed that whatever he said was the absolute truth.  He had been to med school.  He knew what was wrong with me even though he didn’t live in my body 24/7 and experience what I did.

I know a lot of people are still like this.  Their doctor is like a god to them.  He can do no wrong – even if they don’t feel any better after treatment, even if they feel worse.  “But the doctor said…”

Anyway, I digress.

All this changed for me in 1983.

At first I noticed I’d stopped having my periods and, of course, I thought I was pregnant. I went to my Gynecologist who had no explanation. Lots of women lose their periods for a variety of reasons so no one thought that this was really significant.

Then I got really tired, overly tired. I would take my son to a half hour Choir rehearsal and could not stay awake for the whole time. I would lie down in the back of the van, set an alarm and sleep for the 30 minutes.

A whole raft of other symptoms started appearing – I grew a beard (Hirsuitism), gained weight even though I was on Weight Watchers and working out at the gym nearly every day, lost my period, everything hurt, got what is called a “moon face” and a “buffalo hump” on the back of my neck. I also got stretch marks. I was very depressed but it’s hard to say if that was because of the hormone imbalance or because I felt so bad and no one would listen to me.

I came across a little article in the Ladies Home Journal magazine which said “If you have these symptoms…ask your doctor about Cushing’s”. After that, I started reading everything I could on Cushing’s and asking my doctors. Due to all my reading at the library and medical books I bought, I was sure I had Cushing’s but no one would believe me. Doctors would say that Cushing’s Disease is too rare, that I was making this up and that I couldn’t have it.

I asked doctors for three years – PCP, gynecologist, neurologist, podiatrist – all said the now-famous refrain.  It’s too rare.  You couldn’t have Cushing’s.  I kept persisting in my reading, making copies of library texts even when I didn’t understand them, keeping notes.  I just knew that someone, somewhere would “discover” that I had Cushing’s.

My husband was on the doctors’ sides.  He was sure it was all in my mind (as opposed to all in my head!) and he told me to just think “happy thoughts” and it would all go away.

A Neurologist gave me Xanax. Since he couldn’t see my tumor with his Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machine there was “no possibility” that it existed. Boy was he wrong!

Later in 1986 I started bruising incredibly easily. I could touch my skin and get a bruise. On New Year’s Day of 1987 I started bleeding under the skin. My husband made circles around the outside perimeter each hour with a marker, like the rings of a tree. When I went to my Internist the next day he was shocked at the size. He now thought I had a blood disorder so he sent me to a Hematologist/Oncologist.

Fortunately, the Hematologist/Oncologist ran a twenty-four hour urine test and really looked at me. Both he and his partner recognized that I had Cushing’s. Of course, he was sure that he did the diagnosis.  No matter that I had been pursuing this with other doctors for 3 years.

It was not yet determined if it was Cushing’s Disease (Pituitary) or Syndrome (Adrenal). However, he couldn’t help me any further so the Hematologist referred me to an Endocrinologist.

The Endocrinologist, of course, didn’t trust the other tests I had had done so I was back to square one. He ran his own multitude of tests. He had to draw blood at certain times like 9 AM. and 5 PM. There was a dexamethasone suppression test where I took a pill at 10 p.m. and gave blood at 9 am the next day. I collected gallons of urine in BIG boxes (Fun in the fridge!). Those were from 6 a.m. to 6 a.m. to be delivered to his office by 9 a.m. same day. I was always worried that I’d be stopped in rush hour and the police would ask about what was in that big container. I think I did those for a week. He also did standard neurological tests and asked lots of questions.

When the endo confirmed that I had Cushing’s in 1987 he sent me to a local hospital where they repeated all those same tests for another week and decided that it was not my adrenal gland (Cushing’s Syndrome) creating the problem. The doctors and nurses had no idea what to do with me, so they put me on the brain cancer ward.

When I left this hospital after a week, we didn’t know any more than we had before.

As luck would have it, NIH (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) was doing a clinical trial of Cushing’s. I live in the same area as NIH so it was not too inconvenient but very scary at first to think of being tested there. At that time I only had a choice of NIH, Mayo Clinic and a place in Quebec to do this then-rare pituitary surgery called a Transsphenoidal Resection. I chose NIH – closest and free. After I was interviewed by the Doctors there, I got a letter that I had been accepted into the clinical trial. The first time I was there was for 6 weeks as an inpatient. More of the same tests.

There were about 12 of us there and it was nice not to be alone with this mystery disease. Many of these Cushies (mostly women) were getting bald, couldn’t walk, having strokes, had diabetes. One was blind, one had a heart attack while I was there. Towards the end of my testing period, I was looking forward to the surgery just to get this whole mess over with. While I was at NIH, I was gaining about a pound a day!

The MRI still showed nothing, so they did a Petrosal Sinus Sampling Test. That scared me more than the prospect of surgery. (This test carries the risk of stroke and uncontrollable bleeding from the incision points.) Catheters were fed from my groin area to my pituitary gland and dye was injected. I could watch the whole procedure on monitors. I could not move during this test or for several hours afterwards to prevent uncontrolable bleeding from a major artery. The test did show where the tumor probably was located. Also done were more sophisticated dexamethasone suppression tests where drugs were administered by IV and blood was drawn every hour (they put a heplock in my arm so they don’t have to keep sticking me). I got to go home for a weekend and then went back for the surgery – the Transsphenoidal Resection. I fully expected to die during surgery (and didn’t care if I did) so I signed my will and wrote last letters to those I wanted to say goodbye to. During the time I was home just before surgery, a college classmate of mine (I didn’t know her) did die at NIH of a Cushing’s-related problem. I’m so glad I didn’t find out until a couple months later!

November 3, 1987, the surgeon, Dr. Ed Oldfield, cut the gum above my front teeth under my upper lip so there is no scar. He used tiny tools and microscopes. My tumor was removed successfully. In some cases (not mine) the surgeon uses a plug of fat from the abdomen to help seal the cut. Afterwards, I was in intensive care overnight and went to a neurology ward for a few days until I could walk without being dizzy. I had some major headaches for a day or two but they gave me drugs (morphine) for those. Also, I had cotton plugs in my nostrils. It was a big day when they came out. I had diabetes insipidus (DI) for a little while, but that went away by itself – thank goodness!

I had to use a foam product called “Toothies” to brush my teeth without hitting the incision. Before they let me go home, I had to learn to give myself an injection in my thigh. They sent me home with a supply of injectible cortisone in case my level ever fell too low (it didn’t). I was weaned gradually off cortisone pills (scary). I now take no medications. I had to get a Medic Alert bracelet. I will always need to tell medical staff when I have any kind of procedure – the effects of my excess cortisone will remain forever.

I went back to the NIH for several follow-up visits of a week each where they did all the blood and urine testing again. After a few years NIH set me free. Now I go to my “outside” endocrinologist every year for the dexamethasone suppression test, 24-hour urine and regular blood testing.

As I get further away from my surgery, I have less and less chance that my tumor will grow back. I have never lost all the weight I gained and I still have the hair on my chin but most of my other symptoms are gone. I am still and always tired and need a nap most days. I do not, however, still need to take whole days off just to sleep.

I consider myself very lucky that I was treated before I got as bad as some of the others on my floor at NIH but think it is crazy that these symptoms are not taken seriously by doctors.

My story goes on and if you’re interested some is on this blog and some is here:

Forbes Magazine | MaryO’s bio | Cushing’s and Cancer Blog | Cushing’s Awareness Day Testimonial Archive |

Because of this experience in getting a Cushing’s diagnosis – and later, a prescription for growth hormone – I was concerned that there were probably other people not being diagnosed with Cushing’s. When I searched online for Cushing’s, all the sites that came up were for dogs and horses with Cushing’s.  Not what I was looking for!

In July of 2000, I was talking with my dear friend Alice, who ran a wonderful menopause site, Power Surge, wondering why there weren’t many support groups online (OR off!) for Cushing’s.  This thought percolated through my mind for a few hours and I realized that maybe this was my calling.  Maybe I should be the one to start a network of support for other “Cushies” to help them empower themselves.

I wanted to educate others about the awful disease that took doctors years of my life to diagnose and treat – even after I gave them the information to diagnose me.  I didn’t want anyone else to suffer for years like I did.  I wanted doctors to pay more attention to Cushing’s disease.

The first website (http://www.cushings-help.com) went “live” July 21, 2000.  It was just a single page of information. The message boards began September 30, 2000 with a simple message board which then led to a larger one, and a larger.  Today, in 2010, we have over 7 thousand members.  Some “rare disease”!

The message boards are stillactive and we have weekly online text chats, weekly live interviews, local meetings, conferences, email newsletters, a clothing exchange, a Cushing’s Awareness Day Forum, podcasts, phone support and much more. Because I wanted to spread the word to others not on “the boards” we have extended out to social networking sites – twitter groups, facebook groups, twines, friendfeeds, newsletters, websites, chat groups, multiply.com, and much, much more.

People are becoming more empowered and participating in their own diagnoses, testing and treatment.  This have changed a lot since 1983!

When I had my Cushing’s over 40 years ago (AARRGGHH!), I never thought that I would meet another Cushing’s patient in real life or online. Back then, I’d never even been aware that there was anything like an “online”. I’m so glad that people struggling with Cushing’s today don’t have to suffer anymore thinking that they’re the only one who deals with this.

Because of my work on the websites – and, believe me it is a ton of work! – I have had the honor of meeting over a hundred other Cushies personally at local meetings, conferences, at NIH (the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD where I had my final diagnosis and surgery). It occurred to me once that this is probably more than most endocrinologists will ever see in their entire career. I’ve also talked to countless others on the phone. Amazing for a “rare” disease!

I don’t know what pushed me in 1983, how I got the confidence and self-empowerment to challenge these doctors and their non-diagnoses over the years.  I’m glad that I didn’t suffer any longer than I did and I’m glad that I have a role in helping others to find the medical help that they need.

What do *YOU* think?  How are you becoming empowered?

Filed under: Clinical trials, Cushing's, General Health, Health Care, pituitary | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Consecutive Resections of Double Pituitary Adenoma for Resolution of Cushing Disease

Posted on December 20, 2025 by MaryO

BACKGROUND

Double pituitary adenomas are rare presentations of two distinct adenohypophyseal lesions seen in <1% of surgical cases. Increased rates of recurrence or persistence are reported in the resection of Cushing microadenomas and are attributed to the small tumor size and localization difficulties. The authors report a case of surgical treatment failure of Cushing disease because of the presence of a secondary pituitary adenoma.

OBSERVATIONS

A 32-year-old woman with a history of prolactin excess and pituitary lesion presented with oligomenorrhea, weight gain, facial fullness, and hirsutism. Urinary and nighttime salivary cortisol elevation were elevated. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a 4-mm3 pituitary lesion. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling was diagnostic for Cushing disease. Primary endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection was performed to remove what was determined to be a lactotroph-secreting tumor on immunohistochemistry with persistent hypercortisolism. Repeat resection yielded a corticotroph-secreting tumor and postoperative hypoadrenalism followed by long-term normalization of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

LESSONS

This case demonstrates the importance of multidisciplinary management and postoperative hormonal follow-up in patients with Cushing disease. Improved strategies for localization of the active tumor in double pituitary adenomas are essential for primary surgical success and resolution of endocrinopathies.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACTH = adrenocorticotrophic hormone;  BMI = body mass index;  DHEA-S = dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate;  FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone;  GH = growth hormone;  IHC = immunohistochemical;  IPSS = inferior petrosal sinus sampling;  LH = luteinizing hormone;  MRI = magnetic resonance imaging;  POD = postoperative day;  T4 = thyroxine;  TF = transcription factor;  TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone;  UFC = urinary free cortisol

Pituitary adenomas are adenohypophyseal tumors that can cause endocrinopathies, such as pituitary hormone hypersecretion or anterior hypopituitarism. Cell lineages are used to classify these tumors on the basis of immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of transcription factors, hormones, and other biomarkers.1 Pituitary adenomas differentiate from pluripotent stem cells along one of three lineage pathways, depending on the following active transcription factors (TFs): pituitary transcription factor 1 (PIT-1), T-box transcription factor (TPIT), or steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1). Rarely, two or more discrete pituitary adenomas from different lineages are identified in patients; however, the etiology remains unclear.2 The incidence of multiple pituitary adenomas has been reported to be 1%–2% of all resected pituitary adenomas but is likely underestimated based on data from large autopsy series.1–4 Pluri-hormonal adenomas are also rare entities in which a single tumor contains multiple TF lineages with one or more hormonal excesses.1–3 Preoperative recognition of multiple or pluri-hormonal pituitary adenomas is rare, and most tumors are discovered incidentally upon autopsy, intraoperatively, or on histological analysis.2,3,5

In cases of multiple synchronous pituitary adenomas, only one hormone excess syndrome is most frequently evident on clinical presentation and endocrine workup. Silent pituitary tumors positive for prolactin on immunohistochemistry are the most prevalent additional, incidentally found tumor in cases of multiple pituitary adenomas.5 This is particularly true in Cushing disease.6,7 It is important to recognize the presence of multiple pituitary adenomas especially in the setting of hormonally active pituitary adenomas to provide optimal management for this subset of patients. Complete resection is curative for Cushing disease with the standard of care achieved through a transsphenoidal approach. Localization of the tumor presents a challenge because of suboptimal sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in demonstrating microadenomas, the inconsistency of lateralization with inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS), and delays in pathological analysis.1,8,9 Additionally, the presence of an additional pituitary adenoma can obscure the microtumor through its large size and mass effect and can act as a “decoy lesion” during MRI, IPSS, and resection.6

Consideration of multiple pituitary tumors is necessary for successful resection. In a patient with a biochemical picture of Cushing disease, the demonstration of an adenoma with negative adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) immunostaining and the absence of postoperative hypoadrenalism may indicate the existence of a double adenoma. Few cases have described a lack of remission of an endocrinopathy after transsphenoidal resection due to the presence of an additional adenoma,2,6,10 and even less so in the instance of the persistence of Cushing disease.6 We present a rare case of double pituitary adenomas in a patient presenting with Cushing disease who underwent two endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resections and immunostaining for prolactin and ACTH, respectively, with long-term normalization of her hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.

Illustrative Case

History and Presentation

A 32-year-old female, gravida 0 para 0, with a history of a pituitary lesion and hyperprolactinemia presented to our institution for the evaluation for Cushing disease. Ten years earlier, the patient had presented to a gynecologist with hirsutism, galactorrhea, and oligomenorrhea. Her endocrine workup was remarkable for an elevated prolactin at 33.8 ng/mL (2.3–23.3 ng/mL), while follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels were normal. No ACTH or cortisol levels were available. MRI demonstrated a 5 × 6 × 5–mm T1-weighted isointense pituitary lesion protruding into the suprasellar cistern due to a small sella size. She was treated with bromocriptine 2.5 mg daily for 5 years, with normalization of her prolactin level. Subsequent MRI demonstrated a stable lesion size and T1 and T2 hyperintensity in the region of the known pituitary lesion, considered to be posttreatment cystic change with proteinaceous contents and blood. After the normalization of her prolactin levels, she continued to have oligomenorrhea and abnormal hair growth. Polycystic ovaries were not visualized on ultrasound. She was started on oral contraceptives and then switched to the etonorgestrel implant.

A decade after initial presentation, she presented to endocrinology at our institution with 3 years of weight gain, hirsutism, and potential oligomenorrhea. Vital signs were stable (blood pressure: 122/86; heart rate: 72 beats/min), and facial fullness and striae on her bilateral breasts were appreciated on physical examination. She was taking isoniazid and pyridoxine for a recent diagnosis of latent tuberculosis and had discontinued bromocriptine 5 years earlier. Her weight was 66.3 kg and body mass index (BMI) was 23.9 kg/m2. She reported that her maternal uncle had a pituitary tumor. Laboratory analysis was positive for elevated urinary free cortisol (UFC) of 109 µg per 24 hours (2.5–45 µg/24 h; Table 1) and nighttime salivary cortisol of 142 ng/mL (<100 ng/dL) with high-normal prolactin of 22.8 ng/mL (2.3–23.3 ng/dL) and normal FSH, LH, TSH, and thyroxine (T4). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) was 128 µg/dL (98.8–340.0 µg/dL). Imaging demonstrated a 4 × 4 × 4–mm pituitary lesion with decreased T1-weighted and increased central T2-weighted signal intensity in the left lateral pituitary (Fig. 1A–C). Desmopressin (Ferring Pharmaceuticals DDAVP) stimulation increased a basal ACTH of 49.9 pg/mL to ACTH of 91.2 pg/mL, and cortisol increased from 13.7 µg/dL to 21.2 µg/dL, consistent with neoplastic hypercortisolism. IPSS was performed, which showed a right-sided, central-to-peripheral ACTH gradient (Table 2). The patient elected to undergo endoscopic endonasal resection with the initial target as the left-lateral pituitary mass to achieve a cure for Cushing disease.

TABLE 1Urinary free cortisol at baseline and 3, 5, and 7 months after the primary resection

Variable Baseline 3 Mos 5 Mos 7 Mos on Osilodrostat
Urinary free cortisol (4–50 µg/24 hrs) 109 134.2 125.4 40.3
Urinary creatinine (0.5–2.5 g/24 hrs) 0.995 1.17 1.42 1.11
Urinary vol (mL) 1950 2300 2100 2125
FIG. 1
FIG. 1

Preoperative coronal precontrast (A) and postcontrast (B) T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and T2-weighted MRI (C) demonstrated a 4-mm3 lesion (arrows) with decreased T1 and increased central T2 signal intensity in the left lateral pituitary. Two days after surgery, coronal precontrast (D) and postcontrast T1-weighted (E) and T2-weighted (F) MRI demonstrated the unchanged adenoma.

TABLE 2Preoperative inferior petrosal sinus sampling with corticorelin ovine triflutate 68 µg

Time (mins) ACTH (pg/mL) Prolactin (ng/mL)
Peripheral Petrosal Sinus ACTH Ratio Peripheral Petrosal Sinus Prolactin Ratio
Rt Lt Rt Lt Rt Lt Rt Lt
−5 50.6 225 1586 4.45 31.34 21 124 295 5.90 14.05
0 48.8 389 1376 7.97 28.20 22.2 185 198 8.33 8.92
3 69.8 4680 1333 67.05 19.1 22.1 396 32.5 17.92 1.47
5 80.9 4590 1623 56.74 20.06 22.1 436 32.2 19.73 1.46
10 112 4160 1660 37.14 14.82 20.2 367 42 17.90 2.05

ACTH or prolactin ratio = inferior petrosal sinus ACTH or prolactin/peripheral blood ACTH or prolactin.

Primary Resection and Outcomes

During the primary resection, abnormal tissue was immediately visible after a linear incision along the bottom of the dura, with an excellent plane of dissection. The inferomedial adenoma was distinct from the known left lateral lesion, and the resection was considered complete by the primary neurosurgeon. Subsequently, the left-sided adenoma was not pursued because of the historical prolactinoma diagnosis and an assumption that the newly discovered adenoma was the cause of ACTH hypersecretion. However, pathology of the inferomedial tumor was strongly and diffusely positive for prolactin (Fig. 2B), synaptophysin, and cytokeratin, with an Mindbomb Homolog-1 (MIB-1) proliferative index of 2.4%. ACTH, growth hormone (GH), FSH, LH, and TSH immunostaining were negative. TF immunohistochemistry was not available. On postoperative day (POD) 1, pituitary MRI was performed and demonstrated the unchanged 4-mm3 T1-weighted hypointense lesion with small central T2-weighted hyperintensity in the left lateral gland (Fig. 1D–F). Cortisol levels ranged from 9.7 to 76.2 µg/dL (4.8–19.5 µg/dL), and ACTH was 19.5 pg/mL (7.2–63.3 pg/mL) on POD 1.

FIG. 2
FIG. 2

Histological examination of surgical specimens from the inferomedial (A–C) and left lateral (D–F) lesions. The initial resection (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], A) was strongly and diffusely positive for prolactin (B) with normal reticulin levels (C) indicating a lactotrophic pituitary adenoma. The second operation (H&E, D) was diagnostic for a corticotropic pituitary adenoma with diffusely positive adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) (E) and decreased reticulin (F). Original magnification ×100.

Early reoperation was discussed with the patient based on the pathology and persistent hypercortisolism; however, she elected to pursue conservative management with close follow-up. Postoperative cortisol nadir was 4.8 µg/dL (4.8–19.5 µg/dL) on POD 2 during her 4-day hospital stay. DHEA-S was significantly decreased from baseline at 22.3 µg/dL (98.8–340.0 µg/dL) and a prolactin level of 3.4 ng/mL (2.3–23.3 ng/dL) was low-normal. No glucocorticoids were administered during her hospital course. There was no clinical evidence of vasopressin deficiency while she was an inpatient.

Three months postoperatively, the patient reported insomnia, poor hair quality, fatigue, nocturnal sweating, and continued increasing weight gain with fat accumulation in the supraclavicular and dorsal cervical area. She had one spontaneous menstrual period despite the use of etonogestrel implant. UFC was increased at 134.2 µg/24 hours (4–50 µg/24 h; Table 1). The 8:00 am serum cortisol was 10.2 µg/dL (5.0–25.0 µg/dL). She was started on osilodrostat 2 mg twice daily for her persistent hypercortisolism, and she reported some clinical improvement; however, she had continued elevation in her late-night salivary cortisol levels up to 7.0 nmol/L. Other endocrine lab work was normal, with a prolactin of 13.5 ng/mL (2.8–23.3 ng/mL) and TSH of 3.67 µIU/mL (0.4–4.0 µIU/mL). Her weight had increased by 4.9 kg to 71.2 kg with a BMI of 25.3 kg/m2. Approximately 6 months postoperatively, she was amenable to a secondary resection targeting the remaining left lateral pituitary adenoma.

Secondary Resection and Outcomes

After obtaining adequate exposure for the secondary resection, the lesion in the left lateral aspect of the pituitary was targeted. The tumor was clearly identified and completely resected without intraoperative complication. IHC staining was diffusely positive for ACTH (Fig. 2E), synaptophysin, and cytokeratin with decreased reticulin and an MIB-1 index of 3.3%. Prolactin, GH, TSH, LH, and FSH immunostaining were negative. Postoperative cortisol monitoring demonstrated decreased levels, with a nadir of 2.0 µg/dL on POD 0. Levels of ACTH and DHEA-S were decreased at 4.4 pg/mL (7.2–63.3 pg/mL) and 13.3 µg/dL (98.8–340 µg/dL), respectively, on POD 1. Prolactin remained within the normal range at 8.2 ng/mL (2.8–23.3 ng/mL). The patient was started on intravenous hydrocortisone 50 mg every 8 hours for adrenal insufficiency. Postoperative symptoms of nausea, headache, and muscle weakness resolved with hydrocortisone administration. She was discharged on hydrocortisone 60 mg daily in divided doses for adrenal insufficiency and had no signs of vasopressin deficiency during her 2-day hospital course.

By 3 months, the patient reported decreased fatigue, myalgia, and insomnia and improved overall well-being and physical appearance. She was weaned down to a total daily dose of 20 mg of hydrocortisone and had lost 5.2 kg. Her menstruation returned while having an etonogestrel implant. Rapid ACTH stimulation was abnormal, with decreased cortisol at 30 minutes of 4.1 µg/dL (7.2–63.3 pg/mL) demonstrating continued adrenal insufficiency. Follow-up MRI demonstrated miniscule remaining left pituitary adenoma (Fig. 3). Seven months after her second surgery, she was started on 50 µg levothyroxine for primary hypothyroidism in the setting of slightly elevated TSH of 4.1 µIU/mL (0.4–4.0 µIU/mL) and a low-normal T4 of 0.8 ng/dL (0.7–1.5 ng/dL).

FIG. 3
FIG. 3

Postoperative imaging 3 months after the second operation demonstrates near gross-total resection (yellow arrows: surgical cavity) of the left lateral pituitary adenoma on coronal precontrast (A) and postcontrast T1-weighted (B) and T2-weighted (C) MRI.

Two years after the second resection, the patient lost 10.1 kg (weight, 61.1 kg; BMI, 21.76 kg/m2). Her ACTH stimulation test became normal, and hydrocortisone therapy was discontinued. At the 2-year time point, the patient and her husband successfully conceived a child.

Patient Informed Consent

The necessary patient informed consent was obtained in this study.

Discussion

Double or multiple pituitary adenomas are discovered in 0.37%–2.6% of resected pituitary lesions.3,4,6,11,12 A majority of multiple pituitary adenomas are not suspected before surgery with an inconclusive clinical presentation or endocrine laboratory workup.6 The presentation of multiple synchronous neoplasms is thought to be more common than having a single neoplasm with multiple lineages.1 Studies have shown that additional pituitary adenomas are seen at a rate of 1.6%–3.3% in Cushing disease in studies including both contiguous and noncontiguous double pituitary adenomas.6 Additional pituitary adenomas that are hormonally active make up 40% of resected double pituitary adenomas, with most staining for gonadotroph adenoma.13 Overall, the most common incidental pituitary adenoma is prolactinoma,6 which occurs most frequently with GH or ACTH adenomas.5 In very rare instances, Cushing cases can present with hyperprolactinemia and Cushing synchronously.6 Hormonal secretion and clinical presentation are variable, with the pathology most often attributed to only one component of double pituitary adenoma.3,14 The multiple-hit theory is the most common hypothesis for double pituitary adenoma etiology with coincidental monoclonal expansion of two or more lineages, which present with separate pseudo-capsules for each lesion.15

Observations

On presenting with Cushing disease, the differential diagnosis before the initial operation considered that the known left lateral pituitary adenoma could be a mixed tumor with both prolactin and ACTH lineages. Therefore, it was the initial target of the resection until discovering the second adenoma intraoperatively. With two distinct adenomas, the inferomedial adenoma was presumed to be the source of the ACTH hypersecretion and was subsequently resected. The left lesion was thought to be a prolactinoma and hormonally inactive after historical dopaminergic therapy and thus was not pursued during the initial surgery. However, pathology confirmed that the opposite was true. Few cases have also involved incidental pituitary tumors that look like the hormonally active adenoma and encourage resection of it, leaving the primary pituitary adenoma behind.6,7 It has been reported that these “decoy lesions” can cause surgical failure and require secondary operations.6,7,10,16 Intraoperative localization and confirmation of the adenoma classification may have also been helpful during the case, including tissue-based ACTH antibody assay,9 plasma ACTH measurements with a immunochemiluminometric method,17 or intraoperative ultrasound.5,6

The inferomedial second tumor was not appreciated or reported throughout her serial MRI studies from 2010 to 2020. Interestingly, imaging did demonstrate the left pituitary adenoma that was medically treated as a prolactinoma, although it was later diagnosed as an ACTH-secreting lesion on IHC staining. Preoperative visualization of a pituitary adenoma in Cushing disease is reported to be limited, with a reported 50% incidence with negative MRI with standard 1.5 T.1,18,19 MRI technical refinements in magnet strength, slice thickness, or enhanced spin sequences have increased sensitivity, but one-third of patients with Cushing disease still have negative scans.20 Small prolactinomas, especially those near the cavernous sinus, are also notoriously difficult to visualize on MRI, although recent advances using co-registration of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography–computed tomography with MRI (Met-PET/MRICR) may prove useful.21 Difficulty with preoperative visualization complicates a diagnosis of multiple adenomas, with or without multiple endocrinopathies, and negatively affects surgical planning. In a single-institution retrospective review of MRI in all cases of double pituitary tumors, only one of eight patients (12.5%) over 16 years of age had a positive MRI for double pituitary tumors and was diagnosed preoperatively.2

The patient’s preoperative IPSS demonstrated a right central-to-peripheral gradient. This was incongruent with the MRI demonstrating the single left-sided tumor. While IPSS is useful in confirming Cushing disease, its sensitivity for lateralization has been reported at only 59%–71%.9 With this in mind and a known left-sided adenoma on MRI, exploration of the right side of the pituitary was not originally planned. Ultimately, the left-sided adenoma was the source of ACTH hypersecretion, which remains incongruent with preoperative IPSS. It has been suggested that multiple pituitary adenomas in Cushing disease could further decrease its accuracy.1,6

The patient’s initial historical prolactin levels (33.8 ng/dL) were lower than reported levels of 100–250 ng/dL for microadenoma and >250 ng/dL in cases of macroadenoma. Normally, in active single prolactinoma, prolactin secretion is correlated to size. We do not suspect that the presence of more than one pituitary adenoma would affect the level of prolactin hypersecretion.6 Slight elevations in prolactin can be attributed to causes such as pituitary stalk effect, medications, and physiological stimulation. During the 5 years of bromocriptine therapy, the effect on the inferomedial prolactinoma was unknown, as it was not appreciated on MRI. There are reports of prolactinomas being less responsive to dopaminergic agonist therapy in cases of double adenomas.14,22 Upon resection of the inferomedial prolactinoma during the initial operation, there was no further change in the patient’s prolactin levels, which could most likely be attributed to prior dopaminergic therapy. Unfortunately, the initial endocrine laboratory workup did not include levels of ACTH or cortisol. In addition to hyperprolactinemia, Cushing disease can also present with changes in menstruation. After the secondary resection and removal of the ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma, the patient’s oligomenorrhea resolved and she achieved pregnancy. Retrospectively, it remains unclear if the prolactinoma was once truly active hormonally.

Lessons

The rare presence of two pituitary adenomas can complicate the diagnosis, medical and surgical management, and long-term outcomes for patients. A complete endocrine workup is essential when a pituitary adenoma is suspected and can help screen for pluri-hormonal and multiple pituitary adenomas. In our patient, it is unknown when the onset of hypercortisolism was with the limited initial hormonal workup.

Currently, localizing and resecting the hormonally active adenoma in double or multiple pituitary adenomas remain a challenge, with limitations in preoperative imaging and intraoperative measures. After encountering the additional inferomedial lesion during surgery, resection of both adenomas during the initial surgery may have been prudent to ensure the resolution of Cushing disease. Although exploration for additional pituitary adenomas is not usually recommended, it could be considered in cases of multiple pituitary adenomas and uncertainty of the culprit of Cushing disease.

The current characterization of pituitary tumors by the World Health Organization includes immunohistochemistry for both transcription factors and pituitary hormones, with clinical usefulness to be determined by future studies. Multiple lineages can occur mixed in a single pituitary adenoma or across different noncontiguous adenomas and can only be determined by TF immunostaining. The left ACTH-staining lesion in our patient had some shrinkage and MRI changes, which may have been a response to dopaminergic therapy. Full characterization of the tumor cell lineages in this case remains undetermined without staining for TFs.

In conclusion, we report a rare case of Cushing disease concurrent with a prolactinoma leading to the need for repeat resection. This is one of the few reported cases of a double pituitary adenoma leading to a lack of biochemical remission of hypercortisolism after the initial surgery. Strategies for localization of the active tumor in double pituitary adenomas are essential for primary surgical success and the resolution of endocrinopathies.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: Zwagerman, Tavakoli, Shah, Findling. Acquisition of data: Zwagerman, Armstrong, Tavakoli, Shah, Ioachimescu, Findling. Analysis and interpretation of data: Zwagerman, Armstrong, Tavakoli, Shah, Coss, Ioachimescu, Findling. Drafting of the article: Zwagerman, Armstrong, Shah. Critically revising the article: Zwagerman, Armstrong, Tavakoli, Shah, Ioachimescu, Findling. Reviewed submitted version of the manuscript: Zwagerman, Armstrong, Tavakoli, Shah, Laing, Ioachimescu, Findling. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Zwagerman. Statistical analysis: Armstrong, Shah. Administrative/technical/material support: Zwagerman, Armstrong, Shah. Study supervision: Zwagerman, Tavakoli, Shah, Laing.

References

Filed under: Cushing's, pituitary, Rare Diseases, symptoms, Treatments | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Misconceptions About Cushing’s

Posted on December 14, 2025 by MaryO

Cushing’s.  So many people are confused by what it is and what it isn’t.  They may have heard of it because a dog they know has it – or, these days, a horse, ferret, rat.  Seems it’s way more common in lots of animals but not people.

If people have heard of the “animal version” they might say “Yeah, my dog had that and it was easy to diagnose. We just gave him medication…”

When we first started having bios on the website, sometimes people would say that they had Cushions Disease.  At first I wondered about that but then it started to make more sense.  If you’ve never heard of the disease,  the doctor mumbles something.  You know you’re a little “fluffy” and cushions makes a lot of sense.

Twice in the last week I’ve seen Cushing’s described as Crushings Disease.  That sort of makes sense, too.  Cushing’s crushes your plans, relationships, credibility, pretty much everything.

Other misconceptions involve Cushing’s symptoms.  Others, especially doctors, will see you gain weight and assume you’re eating too much and a good diet will fix everything.  Or see that you’re depressed (who wouldn’t be!) and offer anti-depressants.

Doctors may say that Cushing’s is too rare, that they’ll never see a case of it in their practice.  But rare doesn’t mean that no one gets it.  Rare doesn’t mean that doctors shouldn’t test for it.

Then, the anatomy just isn’t right.  People say that they have a brain tumor instead of a pituitary tumor.  I just read this on another site: The pituitary gland is on the bottom of the brain… Umm – not exactly ON the bottom of the brain but maybe close enough for people to get an idea.

What sorts of things about Cushing’s/Cushions/Crushings that just weren’t quite right?

Filed under: Cushing's, Rare Diseases | Tagged: , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Co-Occurrence of Endogenous and Exogenous Cushing’s Syndromes: Does “Double Cushing Syndrome” Really Exist? A Case Report

Posted on December 1, 2025 by MaryO

ABSTRACT

Double Cushing syndrome exists: exogenous steroid use can mask concurrent adrenal hypercortisolism. When symptoms persist and cortisol remains high after tapering or stopping prescribed glucocorticoids, an endogenous source is likely. Early recognition with ACTH testing, dexamethasone suppression, and adrenal imaging reduces misdiagnosis, favors timely surgery, and supports safe tapering.

1 Introduction

Cushing syndrome (CS) is a non-physiological increase in plasma glucocorticoids [1]. In most cases, the source of increased plasma glucocorticoids is caused by exogenous steroid administration, which is quite common, and about 1% of the world population is on long-term (more than 3 months) oral glucocorticoids [1, 2]. On the contrary, endogenous overproduction of glucocorticoids is rare, and annually, only two to eight per million people are diagnosed with endogenous CS [3]. The simultaneous occurrence of endogenous and exogenous CS is an exceptionally uncommon phenomenon. This dual manifestation has been reported in a few case reports, highlighting its rarity and the complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenges it poses [4, 5]. Therefore, in this study, we discuss a patient who presented with cushingoid features and was simultaneously diagnosed with both endogenous and exogenous CS or, as it is called, double CS.

2 Case Presentation

The patient was a 46-year-old male with a history of new-onset hypertension and recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who was referred to our endocrinology clinic with a chief complaint of hip pain and weakness of the lower limbs. In the past 3 years, the patient had been receiving 50 mg/day of oral prednisolone and inhalation powder of Umeclidinium and Vilanterol (62.5/25 μg/dose) because of respiratory complications that started after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. After 3 months of corticosteroid treatment, he experienced DVT for the first time when he was started on rivaroxaban. However, while he was on treatment, the second DVT occurred 1 month before his referral, and therefore, rivaroxaban was changed to warfarin 5 mg/day.

The patient also mentioned weight gain with his body mass index (BMI) rising from 26 to 31 kg/m2, progressive weakness of proximal muscles, easy bruising, decreased libido, mood changes with mostly euphoric mood, and irritability during the last 2 years. Moreover, multiple osteoporotic fractures of ribs, clavicle, sternum, and lumbar vertebrae were added to his symptoms in the past 5 months. At that time, he underwent bone densitometry, which revealed osteopenia of the left hip with a Z-score of −1.3 and severe osteoporosis of total lumbar spine with a T-score of −3.9. He started taking calcium and vitamin D3 supplements and received a single injection of 750 μg/3 mL teriparatide 30 days before his referral to our center.

Two months ago, the patient gradually reduced the dosage of prednisolone by tapering the dose to 12.5 mg/day. However, a month later, the hip pain and muscle weakness worsened to such an extent that the patient was unable to walk. Due to his signs and symptoms, the patient was referred to our center for further evaluation of CS. The patient also mentioned a history of nephrolithiasis, new-onset hypertension, and lower limb edema, for which he was started on eplerenone 25 mg and furosemide 20 mg tablets once daily. In his family history, the patient’s mother had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and his two sisters had a history of nephrolithiasis. The patient did not mention any history of allergies to medications or foods. He was addicted to opium and had 15 pack-years of smoking, but he did not mention alcohol consumption.

Upon admission, the patient presented with a blood pressure of 150/83 mmHg, heart rate of 74 bpm, respiratory rate of 20/min, temperature of 36.5°C, oxygen saturation of 93%, and BMI of 31 kg/m2. He was sitting in a wheelchair due to weakness and severe pain in the hip. On physical examination, the patient showed the features of CS, including moon face, buffalo hump, central obesity, facial plethora, thin and brittle skin, acne, and purple stretch marks (striae) on the flanks (Figure 1). Proximal muscle weakness in the lower limbs with a muscle force grade of 4/5 and 3+ edema was also observed. Laboratory investigations are shown in Table 1.

Details are in the caption following the image

De-identified clinical photographs illustrating the Cushingoid phenotype. (A) Overall habitus with marked central (truncal) adiposity. (B) Rounded plethoric face (“moon facies”). (C) Relatively slender distal extremities compared with truncal obesity. (D) Dorsocervical fat pad (“buffalo hump”). (E) Upper thoracic/supraclavicular fat accumulation. (F) Protuberant abdomen with wide violaceous striae.
TABLE 1. Laboratory findings of case report.
Laboratory test Patient value (in-hospital) Patient value (follow-up) Reference range
On admission
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 16.6 13.6 13.5–17.5
Hematocrit (%) 49.5 42.1 42–52
WBC (white blood cells; 103/μL) 11.8 7.1 4.0–11.0
PLT (platelet count; 103/μL) 286 294 150–450
BUN (blood urea nitrogen; mg/dL) 10 11 7–18
Cr (creatinine; mg/dL) 0.9 0.9 0.7–1.3
ALP (alkaline phosphatase; IU/L) 1016 129 44–147
AST (aspartate aminotransferase; IU/L) 48 30 < 31
ALT (alanine transaminase; IU/L) 88 21 < 31
CRP (C-reactive protein; mg/dL) 31 3 < 5
ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate; mm/h) 63 24 < 15
Sodium (mEq/L) 148 141 136–145
Potassium (mEq/L) 4.8 4.3 3.5–5
FBS (fasting blood glucose; mg/dL) 97 89 80–100
TC (total cholesterol; mg/dL) 267 182 < 200
TG (triglyceride; mg/dL) 148 104 < 200
LDL (low-density lipoprotein; mg/dL) 138 98 < 130
HDL (high-density lipoprotein; mg/dL) 64 55 30–70
In hospital
Cortisol 8 a.m. fasting (μg/dL) 20.2 14.1 4.3–24.9
ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone; pg/mL) < 1 — 7.2–63.3
1 mg Overnight dexamethasone suppression test (μg/dL) 16.5 — < 1.8

3 Methods (Differential Diagnosis, Investigations, and Treatment)

Initially suspected of having exogenous-induced CS, the patient’s prednisolone was on hold for 3 days. Cortisol 8 a.m. fasting level, measured with Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) test, was 20.2 μg/dL (585.4 nmol/L) and < 1 pg/mL, respectively. Due to the lack of suppression of serum cortisol despite not using oral glucocorticoids, the absence of adrenal insufficiency symptoms, and the fact that the patient’s symptoms remained unchanged during this period, co-occurrence of endogenous CS was suspected.

A 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test was performed to confirm endogenous CS diagnosis, and the results were reported as 16.5 μg/dL (normal range < 1.8 μg/dL). Considering the possibility of an ACTH-independent CS, the patient underwent an abdominopelvic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of abdominopelvic with adrenal protocol, which revealed a well-defined lesion with an approximate size of 32.8 × 38.6 mm in the left adrenal gland with a radiodensity of 90 Hounsfield units and a normal right adrenal gland (Figure 2). Moreover, evidence of previous old fractures as multiple callus formation was seen involving the clavicles, sternum, bilateral ribs, ischium, and pelvic bones. Multilevel old stable compression fractures of thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies were also present. The differential diagnoses were glucocorticoid secretory adrenal tumors, including adrenal cell carcinoma and lipid-poor adenoma. In order to rule out pheochromocytoma, 24-h urine catecholamines were measured, and the results were negative.

Details are in the caption following the image

Abdominopelvic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with adrenal protocol showing a well-defined lesion with an approximate size of 32.8 × 38.6 mm in the left adrenal gland; radiodensity 90 HU. (A) Transverse plane. (B) Coronal plane. (C) Sagittal plane.

Finally, the patient underwent left adrenalectomy and corticosteroid replacement therapy due to the suppression of the other adrenal gland. According to the post-operative pathological investigations, immunohistochemistry markers reported as negative chromogranin, positive melan-A and inhibin, less than 3% Ki-67 marker, and lipid-poor adrenal cortical adenoma without invasions were diagnosed (Figure 3).

Details are in the caption following the image

Immunohistochemistry of the adrenal lesion (all panels acquired with a 100× oil-immersion objective; 10× eyepiece; original magnification ×1000). (A) Positive inhibin, (B) Positive Melan-A, (C) Less than 3% Ki-67 marker, and (D) Negative chromogranin.

4 Results (Outcome and Follow-Up)

Within 3 months after the operation, the patient’s corticosteroid was tapered and then discontinued due to the normalization of the cortisone serum test (14.1 μg/dL). Proximal limb weakness and hip pain, which had deprived the patient of the ability to move, gradually improved so that he could walk easily and perform daily activities. The signs and symptoms related to CS, including the patient’s mood, skin signs, and general appearance, returned to normal. The patient has been followed up for 6 months after the surgery. The patient’s BMI decreased to 24 kg/m2, and he stopped his anti-hypertensive medications with a blood pressure of 100/60 mmHg without previously prescribed drugs. So far, the laboratory tests have been within the normal range, and he has no complaints (Table 1).

5 Discussion

The described case was diagnosed with a cortisol-producing adrenocortical adenoma accompanied by exogenous CS. CS is an uncommon clinical condition caused by prolonged exposure to increased cortisol levels, which can be due to endogenous or exogenous factors [6]. Endogenous CS is infrequent and is classified as ACTH-dependent (80% of cases) or ACTH-independent (20% of cases) [7]. In the ACTH-independent category, adrenal adenoma accounts for 60% of cases and only 12% of cases of endogenous CS [7, 8]. Exogenous CS mainly occurs due to prolonged administration of glucocorticoids, which are used to manage a broad spectrum of diseases such as inflammatory, autoimmune, or neoplastic disorders and are the most common cause of CS worldwide [9]. Multiple factors, including formulation, duration of administration, pharmacokinetics, affinity, and potency of exogenous glucocorticoids, affect the probability of exogenous CS, but all forms of glucocorticoids can induce CS [10].

In the setting of cushingoid clinical features with chronic administration of high-dose glucocorticoids, especially oral prednisolone, the probability of exogenous CS is remarkably high; therefore, CS diagnostic approaches suggest that the first step after confirmation of cortisol excess is ruling out exogenous glucocorticoid administration [7, 8, 10]. Therefore, the possibility of co-occurrence of endogenous CS with iatrogenic CS is extremely low, and the diagnosis requires high clinical suspicion [4].

Differentiating endogenous and exogenous CS based on clinical features can be challenging and far-fetched. However, a few points can help physicians distinguish between these two. First, exogenous CS symptoms tend to be more striking, while endogenous CS appears more gradually. Second, hypertension, hypokalemia, and features of androgen excess, such as acne and hirsutism, are more common in endogenous CS [4, 10]. In addition, endogenous CS should be suspected if the patient’s symptoms continue after corticosteroid discontinuation or if the serum cortisol level is high despite corticosteroid cessation. In our case, the patient had a high cortisol level despite stopping prednisolone for 3 days, and he did not have any symptoms of adrenal insufficiency despite stopping prednisolone suddenly. Consequently, it was suspected that glucocorticoids might come from an endogenous source. Because ACTH was suppressed concurrently with elevated cortisol, non-ACTH-dependent CS was suspected, and MDCT of abdominopelvic confirmed it.

So far, few similar cases of simultaneous endogenous and exogenous CS have been reported. The first case was a 23-year-old woman with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who was administered high doses of triamcinolone for 16 years [4]. The development of cushingoid features that favored endogenous CS, such as hirsutism and acne, strengthened the suspicion of endogenous CS, and a CT scan revealed hypercortisolism with a bulky and nodular left adrenal gland, and a double CS was confirmed [4]. The second case was a 66-year-old woman diagnosed with exogenous CS after consumption of Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for a year [5]. The cessation of TCM did not significantly improve her cushingoid features, and she developed additional CS complications, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and osteoporotic fractures over the next 8 years. CS workup revealed a right-sided adrenal adenoma, and after the adrenalectomy, her clinical cushingoid features markedly improved [5]. These cases suggest that exogenous and endogenous CS can exist simultaneously in the same person. Although it is very rare, it should be considered in a person who still complains of CS symptoms after corticosteroid cessation. We suggest clinicians evaluate the patients for the disappearance of exogenous CS symptoms after tapering and stopping glucocorticoids. If the symptoms remain, they should be evaluated for endogenous CS.

6 Conclusion

The co-occurrence of an endogenous CS in the setting of an exogenous CS is curious. The diagnosis is based on a high clinical suspicion. Clinicians should evaluate patients for symptom resolution after tapering and discontinuing corticosteroids. Clinical cushingoid features that do not resolve after discontinuing exogenous glucocorticoids and high cortisol levels despite discontinuing corticosteroids should raise clinicians’ suspicion of the co-occurrence of exogenous and endogenous CS.

Author Contributions

Reza Amani-Beni: investigation, methodology, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Atiyeh Karimi Shervedani: methodology, writing – original draft. Bahar Darouei: conceptualization, validation, writing – review and editing. Matin Noroozi: methodology, writing – original draft. Maryam Heidarpour: conceptualization, supervision, validation, writing – review and editing.

Acknowledgments

The authors have nothing to report.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report, including de-identified clinical photographs, in accordance with the journal’s patient consent policy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available on request of the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccr3.71419

Filed under: adrenal, Cushing's, symptoms | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment »

Next Page »