Cushing’s Syndrome Presenting as Non-Atherosclerotic Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure

Abstract

Cushing’s syndrome is a rare cause of myocardial infarction and heart failure. Herein, we report a female patient who presented acute myocardial infarction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The patient was found to have hypercortisolism secondary to adrenocortical adenoma and responded well to therapy. This case underlines the effects of hypercortisolism on the cardiovascular system. The clinical presentation of this patient is unique because non-atherosclerotic myocardial infarction is rarely reported in Cushing’s syndrome patients.

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome is an endocrine condition associated with excessive secretion of cortisol. Hypertension, vascular atherosclerosis, and chronic cardiac remodelling and dysfunction are commonly recognized cardiovascular complications in Cushing’s syndrome patients.1 Herein, we report a rare case of Cushing’s syndrome patient with a primary diagnosis of non-atherosclerotic myocardial infarction and heart failure (HF).

Case Report

A 61-year-old female with a past medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was admitted with sudden onset chest pain on 6 February 2018. Electrocardiogram showed ST-segment elevation in leads V3–V5. Blood biochemical results of 1 h after the onset of chest pain: cardiac troponin I (cTnI) 0.06 ug/L↑, creatine kinase (CK) 63 U/L, creatine phosphokinase-MB (CK-MB) 22 U/L, aspartate transferase (AST) 19 U/L, and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) 482 U/L. Myocardial injury markers were markedly elevated at the time point of 18 h after onset: cTnI 13.9 ug/L↑, CK 613 U/L↑, CK-MB 102 U/L↑, AST 112 U/L↑, and LDH 833 U/L↑. Due to the acute ECG changes and elevated myocardial injury markers, the patient was preliminarily diagnosed as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and underwent coronary angiography, which showed no stenosis, occlusion or dissection of coronary arteries (Figure 1). Echocardiography showed enlarged left atrial dimension (LAD, 55 mm) and left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVDd, 57 mm), and reduced ejection fraction (EF, 33%). The patient was treated for STEMI and HF, and was started on aspirin, statin, diuretic of furosemide and spirolactone, metoprolol, and Sacubitril/valsartan (SV, initiated June, 2020). The patient was strictly adherent to the medication prescribed (Table 1).

Details are in the caption following the image

Coronary angiogram demonstrating no significant obstruction in coronary artery circulation.
Table 1. Echocardiography results
2020-06-22 2020-09-02 2021-03-29 2021-06-02 2021-09-01 2021-10-22 2021-12-21
LAD (mm) 55 55 46 52 47 44 41
LVDd (mm) 57 57 53 55 54 51 55
IVS (mm) 10 10 11 10 10 10 11
LVPW (mm) 11 11 11 10 11 9 10
EF (%) 33 30 31 39 47 49 52.5
  • EF, ejection fraction; IVS, interventricular septum; LAD, left atrium dimension; LVDd, left ventricular end diastolic dimension; LVPW, left ventricular posterior wall.

However, the patient’s condition was not improved despite optimized medication. On 26 January 2021, the patient was re-admitted with recurrent chest distress and oedema, with new symptoms of facial plethora, centripetal obesity, and hyperglycaemia (Figure S1). Abdominal CT scan showed a right adrenal adenoma (Figure 2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed enlarged LVDd (62 mm), and reduced EF, with delayed myocardial enhancement and evidence of myocardial fibrosis and fatty deposits (Figure 3). Laboratory findings showed hypokalaemia: potassium 3.0 mmol/L, elevated serum cortisol level, low plasma ACTH level, and positive 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test. Based on the above findings, the patient was diagnosed with Cushing’s syndrome and started treatment with the glucocorticoid receptor inhibitor mifepristone on 5 February 2021.

Details are in the caption following the image

Abdominal CT scan showed adrenal adenoma at the right.

Details are in the caption following the image

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed enlarged LVDd, reduced EF, with delayed myocardial enhancement, evidence of myocardial fibrosis and fatty deposits.

With mifepristone added to the previous medical therapy (aspirin, statin, sacubitril/valsartan, metoprolol and diuretic of furosemide and spirolactone, and mifepristone), the patient’s condition and cardiac function improved, and echocardiography (21 December 2021) showed increased EF (52.5%). The patient underwent partial adrenalectomy on 22 December 2021. Postoperative pathology confirmed adrenal cortical adenoma. At last follow-up on 29 May 2023, the patient showed marked improvement in face and body shape, with no complaints of chest distress or oedema (Figure S2).

Discussion

In this case, the patient was first evaluated for STEMI due to her symptoms of chest pain, and the elevated ST-segment on ECG, along with the moderately elevated troponin I and other cardiac enzyme levels. However, coronary atherosclerotic heart disease was ruled out by the normal cardiac catheterization. We presume that a possible reason for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) might be vasospastic angina due to abnormal hormone levels with Cushing’s syndrome, leading to increased excessive myocardial metabolic demand and relative myocardial hypoxia, which eventually induced myocardial infarction. Although coronary atherosclerotic heart disease is the main cause of AMI, many non-atherosclerotic processes can lead to an imbalance between decreased coronary blood flow and increased myocardial metabolic demand. To date, non-atherosclerotic myocardial infarction has rarely been reported in Cushing’s syndrome patients. Vieira JT et al. reported that a patient with Cushing’s disease was considered to have spontaneous coronary artery dissection, which is a rare reason for AMI.2

Cushing’s syndrome is associated with an increased risk of cardiac failure,3 with both structural alterations and functional impairment. In our case, the patient’s CMR imaging showed typical features of cardiac geometry, function, and fibrosis, in accordance with previous reports.4 The underlying mechanisms may be the enhanced responsiveness to angiotensin II and activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor in direct response to cortisol excess.5

Our patient responded well to the therapy of conventional anti-HF medication of sacubitril/valsartan, metoprolol, and diuretic, once mifepristone was added. This favourable response to the pharmacological regimen supports the benefits of the agents for the normalization of excess cortisol. This case indicates that early diagnosis and effective treatment of Cushing’s syndrome may be crucial in preventing irreversible cardiac dysfunction secondary to cardiovascular events and heart failure.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81900409 and 82172182) and the PLA Youth Training Project for Medical Science (19QNP037).

Conflict of interest

The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

From https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.14548

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone-Dependent Cushing’s Syndrome Complicated With Gastric Ulcer Perforation in a 30-Year-Old Saudi Female

Abstract

Gastrointestinal perforation is a well-addressed complication of exogenous hypercortisolism; however, patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) do not usually experience this condition in clinical practice. The literature on this subject is limited and consists solely of clinical case reports/series with only 23 instances of gastrointestinal perforation occurring in individuals with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome. This is mainly attributed to the rarity of Cushing’s syndrome itself and the low chance of occurrence of such complications.

We report a case of a recently diagnosed adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent Cushing’s syndrome in a 30-years-old female who presented initially with a three-month history of progressive weight gain, generalized weakness, acne, menstrual irregularity, and severe hypokalemia, and then developed a gastric ulcer perforation only one month after her ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome diagnosis and was managed through emergent surgery.

Introduction

A disorder of the endocrine system characterized by excessive cortisol production, known as Cushing’s syndrome, rarely occurs. The main causes are pituitary tumors, ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting tumors, or adrenal tumors that secrete cortisol independently [1]. Patients initially present with a wide range of symptoms, including weight gain, proximal myopathy, skin thinning, and abdominal striae [1]. Additionally, several metabolic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, can occur, especially when the diagnosis is not established at an early stage [2]. There is a possibility of gastrointestinal complications among patients receiving exogenous glucocorticoids. However, there is limited information on gastrointestinal complications associated with endogenous hypercortisolemia [3,4]. Thus far, only 23 instances have been published addressing the co-occurrence of gastrointestinal perforation with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome [5-17]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reporting gastric perforation in an ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, while the vast majority reported diverticular, sigmoid, or duodenal perforation with Cushing’s syndrome [5-17]. Herein, we describe the medical history, physical examination, and investigatory findings of a 30-year-old female with a recent diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome that was complicated by gastric ulcer perforation, necessitating an urgent exploratory laparotomy. The primary motivator of this case report was the rarity of the described condition, the atypical location of the perforation in such patient group, and the relatively young age of the patient.

Case Presentation

History and examination

A 30-year-old female with a history of mental retardation was admitted to our emergency department (ER) with progressive weakness and fatigue. Upon taking the history, she had been having menstrual irregularities, progressive weight gain, and generalized weakness, which was significant enough to limit her physical activity and hinder her movement for the past three months. Initial vital signs showed that the patient had a body temperature of 37°C, a pulse rate of 90 beats per minute, and a blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg. On physical examination, the patient had a moon face with supraclavicular fullness, dorsocervical fat pad, purple abdominal striae, facial signs of hirsutism, and acne all over the face, shoulders, chest, and back.

Investigations

In the initial laboratory examination, hypokalemia of 2.1 mEq/L, hyperglycemia of 12.1 mmol/L, and metabolic alkalosis were detected (Table 1). The cortisol level after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test was 2204 nmol/L (normal range 140-690), ACTH 123 pg/mL (normal range 7.2-63.3), DHEA-S 27.85 umol/L (normal range 2.6-13.9), And 24-hour urine cortisol level was 1560 mg/day (normal range 30-350) (Table 1). No suppression was observed in cortisol level with 8 mg dexamethasone suppression test.

Parameter Initial presentation Perforation presentation Refrence range
Na+ 143 mEq/L 139 mmol/L 135-147 mEq/L
Cl- 85 mEq/L 105 mmol/L 98-108 mEq/L
K+ 2.1 mEq/L 2.8 mmol/L 3.5-5.0 mEq/L
Mg2+ 0.79 mmol/L 0.77 mmol/L 0.85-1.110 mmol/L
PO3- 0.88 mmol/L 1.23 mmol/L 0.97-1.46 mmol/L
PH 7.54 7.36 7.35-7.45
PCO2 67.5 mmHg 42.7 mmHg 35-45 mmHg
PO2 27.7 mmHg 62.2 mmHg 75-100 mmHg
HCO3 49.8 mEq/L 23.6 mEq/L 22-26 mEq/L
Random blood glucose 12.1 mmol/L 24.1 mmol/L <5.5 mmol/L
Hemoglobin 13.5 g/dL 14.9 g/dL 13.7-16.8 g/dL
White blood cells 9,720 /uL 11,100 /uL 3,300-8,600 /uL
Lymphocyte 0.48% 0.33%
Neutrophil 8.55% 9.66%
Eosinophil 0.0% 0.0%
TSH 0.55 mIU/L Was not ordered 0.4-4.0 mIU/L
Cortisol 2204 nmol/L 4842 nmol/L 140-690 nmol/L
ACTH 123 pg/mL Was not ordered 7.2-63.3 pg/mL
Table 1: Laboratory findings on initial presentation and on perforation day

TSH – thyroid stimulating hormone; ACTH – adrenocorticotropic hormone

A series of CT scans for the neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed and failed to localize any tumors acting as an ectopic source. A pituitary MRI was performed, and no adenoma was found. To complete the diagnostic workup, we decided to do an inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) and PET scan with Gallium 68; however, the patient’s family refused and requested discharge and outpatient follow-ups. These results, together with the biochemical and clinical findings, supported the diagnostic hypothesis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome.

Treatment/management

When addressing the issue of hypokalemia that the patient presented with initially, it was found to be resistant and difficult to correct. The patient was put on spironolactone 50 mg BID, and potassium chloride 20 mEq q8h, and her potassium level barely reached 3.5 mmol/L after several days. In addition, her magnesium level was corrected with magnesium oxide 800 mg every six hours. Her blood glucose level was controlled with insulin glargine 6 units daily and Novorapid as per the sliding scale. The patient was discharged on spironolactone tablets 50 mg BID (oral), potassium chloride 20 mEq q8h, cholecalciferol, calcium carbonate, insulin glargine 6 units daily, and Novorapid 4 units TID before meals.

Follow-up and outcomes

Seven days after discharge, she presented to the ER complaining of a new onset of abdominal pain, constipation, and reduced urine output. Her Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 15, her blood pressure measurement was 146/90 mmHg, her pulse rate was 66 beats per minute, her respiratory rate was 21 breaths per minute, and her temperature was 36.7°C. Upon physical examination, the patient had distended non-tender abdomen without any other significant findings. Blood work was done, including renal functions, and all parameters, including potassium, were within normal limits. A chest X-ray was also performed and revealed no evidence of pneumoperitoneum. The patient was clinically stable after managing her abdominal pain with acetaminophen injection and administering fleet enema for constipation. After instructions on when to come again to the ER were given, the patient was discharged home on lactulose and paracetamol, and a close outpatient follow-up appointment was scheduled.

Five days after the ER visit, the patient presented again to the ER. She was still complaining of severe non-resolving abdominal pain, constipation, and reduced urine output. Upon physical examination in the ER, the patient was found to have developed a new onset of lower limb edema, abdominal rebound tenderness, and abdominal rigidity and guarding. She was hypotensive with a blood pressure of 91/46 mmHg, pulse rate of 80 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, temperature of 38.2 °C, and SpO2 of 96%. The only significant laboratory finding was her potassium level dropping low to 2.8 mEq/L (Table 1). An X-ray of the chest was requested and showed a large pneumoperitoneum (Figure 1).

Posteroanterior-chest-X-ray-at-the-time-of-gastric-perforation-displaying-severe-air-under-the-diaphragm-with-bilateral-obstruction-indicating-massive-pneumoperitoneum-(red-arrow)
Figure 1: Posteroanterior chest X-ray at the time of gastric perforation displaying severe air under the diaphragm with bilateral obstruction indicating massive pneumoperitoneum (red arrow)

Abdominal CT was also urgently performed and confirmed the presence of gastric perforation likely related to an underlying perforated peptic ulcer with 0.8 cm defect at the distal greater curvature (Figures 23).

Coronal-section-CT-image-of-abdomen-and-pelvis-at-the-time-of-gastric-perforation-showing-features-of-gastric-perforation-likely-related-to-the-underlying-perforated-peptic-ulcer-with-0.8-cm-defect-at-the-distal-greater-curvature-
Figure 2: Coronal-section CT image of abdomen and pelvis at the time of gastric perforation showing features of gastric perforation likely related to the underlying perforated peptic ulcer with 0.8 cm defect at the distal greater curvature
Horizontal-section-CT-image-showing-features-of-gastric-perforation-likely-related-to-the-underlying-perforated-peptic-ulcer-with-0.8-cm-defect-at-the-distal-greater-curvature
Figure 3: Horizontal-section CT image showing features of gastric perforation likely related to the underlying perforated peptic ulcer with 0.8 cm defect at the distal greater curvature

The patient underwent an emergent gastric wedge resection for gastric perforation, and the pathology reported evidence of gastric ulcer with no evidence of malignancy. Furthermore, Helicobacter pylori test was performed on the sample, and it came back positive. The patient tolerated the surgery very well, and postoperative recovery was without any complications.

Later, the patient was prescribed metyrapone 250 mg Q4h, which was then increased to 500 mg Q4h four days after surgery, and her cortisol level significantly dropped to 634nmol/L. During that time, a gastrin level test was also performed to exclude the presence of gastrinomas, and the level was 45 pg/ml (normal range 13-115).

Discussion

A small percentage of the population suffers from Cushing’s syndrome, which is an endocrine disorder characterized by an endogenous overproduction of glucocorticoids, resulting in hypercortisolemia [1]. It is estimated to affect 0.7 to 2.4 people per million annually [1]. Hypercortisolemia alters psychologic, metabolic, and cardiovascular functions, resulting in increased mortality and morbidity rates, particularly if the diagnosis is delayed and long-term exposure to high cortisol levels occurs [2]. Women are more likely to suffer from this condition than men, and people in their 40s to 60s are most vulnerable to it [1]. Patients initially present with a wide range of symptoms, including weight gain, proximal myopathy, skin thinning, and abdominal striae [1]. Additionally, several metabolic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, can occur [1]. Due to the rarity of this condition, there is often a significant delay in diagnosis and treatment, which could eventually lead to complications from prolonged hypercortisolism.

From another standpoint, in a systematic review, the incidence of peptic ulcer perforation ranges from 3.8 to 14 per 100,000 individuals in the general population [18]. In under-developed countries, patients are typically young, tobacco-using males [19]. However, patients in industrialized countries are typically older with multiple co-morbidities and are on long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or steroid use [19]. Patients may present with an abrupt onset of abdominal discomfort, abdominal rigidity, and tachycardia in the early stages of a perforated peptic ulcer [19]. Later, abdominal distention, pyrexia, hypotension, fever, and vomiting can occur [19]. Furthermore, when the diagnosis is made early, a perforated ulcer often has a good prognosis. However, the risk of adverse events increases if there is a delay in the diagnosis [20]. Therefore, making an early detection through different imaging modalities is crucial [20]. A history of peptic ulcer disease, NSAIDs, physiological stress, smoking, corticosteroids, and Helicobacter pylori are some of the well-established risk factors for a perforated peptic ulcer [20].

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori among Saudi patients is high; in one study, the overall prevalence was 46.5% in patients with dyspepsia using gastric biopsy [21]. Several studies have explored the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal perforation, but the results have been mixed. Some studies have suggested a higher prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among individuals with gastrointestinal perforation compared to those without, indicating a potential association. However, other studies have found no significant difference in the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection between perforated and non-perforated gastrointestinal ulcer cases [22]. Furthermore, they suggested that the presence of other risk factors like the use of NSAIDs, smoking, and alcohol may interact with Helicobacter pylori infection and contribute to the development of complications such as gastrointestinal perforation [22]. However, in our case, the patient did not have any established risk factors for gastric perforation, such as NSAIDs, smoking, or alcohol. Therefore, considering the low incidence of gastrointestinal perforation and high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori, the conflicting data regarding the association between Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal perforation, and the lack of established risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation in our patient, we suggest that prolonged excess glucocorticoids from Cushing’s syndrome may have contributed to the gastric perforation either independently or synergistically with Helicobacter pylori since hypercortisolism can lead to a weakened gastrointestinal wall integrity due to decreased collagen turnover and disruption of mucosal protection by prostacyclin [15]. In addition, because of hypercortisolism, perforation may not be contained or healed initially due to the immunosuppressive effects of hypercortisolism, whether endogenous or exogenous [15]. Additionally, high levels of cortisol may delay the diagnosis and treatment since it may mask the symptoms of the perforation [14]. Moreover, our patient was treated for severe hypokalemia with potassium supplementation for an extended period of time. Previous studies have linked potassium chloride supplementation to gastrointestinal ulceration and perforation, making this a possible additive cause of our patient’s condition [23,24].

A limited number of studies have addressed gastrointestinal perforations associated with endogenous hypercortisolemia [5-17]. The correlation between Cushing’s syndrome and gastrointestinal perforation is highlighted in our study and in the case reports that have been previously published (Table 2). Similar to our case, a female predominance was seen in gastrointestinal perforation among the reported cases of Cushing’s syndrome [6,7,12,13,15,16]. Additionally, the average age at which gastrointestinal perforation occurred in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism ranged from 45 to 80, which is a noticeably higher age range than the case we are presenting here (aged 30) [6-10,12]. Furthermore, unlike our case, in which gastrointestinal perforation occurred four months after the onset of Cushing’s symptoms, Intestinal perforation occurs approximately 9.8 months after Cushing’s symptoms first appear [15]. Furthermore, in our patient, gastric perforation occurred while she was hypercortisolemic and not in a remission state. Hence, in association with Helicobacter pylori infection, severe hypercortisolemia could have been a secondary contributing factor to gastric perforation. The complications of gastric ulceration, specifically with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome, have been addressed in two case reports [25,26]. It must be noted, however, that neither case is similar to ours. A case of gastric perforation was reported by Kubicka et al. in a patient who had a confirmed diagnosis of gastrinoma, and the patient was diagnosed with ectopic Cushing’s syndrome seven months after gastric perforation [25]. Therefore, since ectopic Cushing’s syndrome was diagnosed seven months after the perforation, it is more likely that the gastrinoma contributed to this complication. In contrast, our patient’s serum gastrin level was within the normal range, ruling out gastrinoma. Further, Hoshino et al. reported a case of gastrointestinal bleeding in a 39-year-old man with a confirmed diagnosis of Cushing’s disease secondary to pituitary adenoma [26]. He was found to have gastric ulceration and bleeding along with Helicobacter pylori infection and elevated cortisol levels [26]. In spite of the patient not developing a gastric perforation, it was suggested by the author that hypercortisolism might be a contributing factor for gastric ulcer complications by slowing down the ulcer healing process [26]

Reference Year of publication Age, gender Highest cortisol level plasma cortisol (PC, nmol/L) / UFC (nmol/L) Cause of Cushing’s syndrome Time from onset of Cushing’s symptoms to perforation (months) Reported site of gastrointestinal perforation
Current 2023 30, Female PC 4842 ACTH-dependant 4 Gastric perforation
Ishinoda et al. [17] 2023 24, Male PC 1647 Cushing’s disease 12 Sigmoid colon perforation
Wijewickrama et al. [16] 2021 32, Female PC 1147 Pituitary microadenoma 1 Diverticular perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 72, Female UFC 5296 Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor 12 Diverticular perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 61, Female PC 1925 Metastatic medullary carcinoma of thyroid 12 Sigmoid colon and diverticular perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 68, Female UFC 410 Cushing’s disease 12 Sigmoid colon perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 71, Female UFC 1533 Cushing’s disease 4 Diverticular perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 54, Male UFC 374 Cushing’s disease 3 Sigmoid colon perforation
Shahidi et al. [15] 2019 52, Female UFC 885 Cushing’s disease 16 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 80, Female UFC 5601 Lung carcinoid 36 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 60, Female UFC 72726 Metastatic islet cell carcinoma 36 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 31, Male UFC 1297 Cushing’s disease 20 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 52, Female UFC 2371 Lung carcinoid 4 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 67, Male UFC 3836 Ectopic ACTH 10 Diverticular perforation
Sater et al. [14] 2018 51, Male UFC 13552 Metastatic thymic carcinoma 4 Diverticular perforation
Kaya et al. [9] 2016 70, Male PC 1432 Small cell lung cancer 1 Diverticular perforation
Dacruz et al. [12] 2016 60, Female UFC 4481 Metastatic parotid tumor 5 Sigmoid colon and diverticular perforation
Matheny et al. [10] 2016 67, Male UFC 11119 Metastatic medullary carcinoma of thyroid 4 Diverticular perforation
Flynn et al. [13]   2016 63, Female UFC 12465 Pheochromocytoma 1 Perforation at the splenic flexure
Balestrieri et al. [11] 2016 75, Male PC 2272 Neuroendocrine tumor 1 Intestinal perforation
Hara et al, [8] 2013 79, Male PC 1230 Cushing’s disease 6 Diverticular perforation
De Havenon et al. [7] 2011 71, Female PC 2593 Cushing’s disease 9 Diverticular perforation
Lutgers et al. [6] 2010 55, Female UFC 10152 Right pheochromocytoma 1 Sigmoid colon and diverticular perforation
Drake et al. [5] 1998 35, Male PC 1442 Islet cell tumor 4 Duodenal perforation and rupture of pancreatic pseudocyst
Table 2: Current case and previous reported 23 cases of patients with Cushing’s syndrome and gastrointestinal perforation

UFC – urinary free cortisol; PC – plasma cortisol; ACTH – adrenocorticotropic hormone

Conclusions

A high blood cortisol level can be associated with various clinical manifestations and diverse sets of complications. This case report sheds light on one of the less common complications of hypercortisolism in patients with Cushing’s syndrome, which is gastrointestinal perforation. Our report further supports the published evidence that gastrointestinal perforation is a rare but potentially fatal complication among patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Moreover, it highlights the possibility of developing gastric perforations in this patient group, even at younger ages than expected. This should elicit a high clinical suspicion and demand prompt investigation of Cushing’s syndrome patients in a hypercortisolism state presenting with modest gastrointestinal symptoms.

References

  1. Pivonello R, De Martino MC, De Leo M, Lombardi G, Colao A: Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008, 37:135-49. 10.1016/j.ecl.2007.10.010
  2. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK: Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2006, 367:1605-17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68699-6
  3. Goethals L, Nieboer K, De Smet K, De Geeter E, Tabrizi NH, Van Eetvelde E, de Mey J: Cortisone associated diverticular perforation. JBR-BTR. 2011, 94:348-9. 10.5334/jbr-btr.705
  4. Piekarek K, Israelsson LA: Perforated colonic diverticular disease: the importance of NSAIDs, opioids, corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008, 23:1193-7. 10.1007/s00384-008-0555-4
  5. Drake WM, Perry LA, Hinds CJ, Lowe DG, Reznek RH, Besser GM: Emergency and prolonged use of intravenous etomidate to control hypercortisolemia in a patient with Cushing’s syndrome and peritonitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998, 83:3542-4. 10.1210/jcem.83.10.5156
  6. Lutgers HL, Vergragt J, Dong PV, de Vries J, Dullaart RP, van den Berg G, Ligtenberg JJ: Severe hypercortisolism: a medical emergency requiring urgent intervention. Crit Care Med. 2010, 38:1598-601. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e47b7a
  7. de Havenon A, Ehrenkranz J: A perforated diverticulum in Cushing’s disease. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2011, 2:215-7. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2011.06.009
  8. Hara T, Akutsu H, Yamamoto T, Ishikawa E, Matsuda M, Matsumura A: Cushing’s disease presenting with gastrointestinal perforation: a case report. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2013, 2013:130064. 10.1530/EDM-13-0064
  9. Kaya T, Karacaer C, Açikgöz SB, Aydemir Y, Tamer A: Severe hypokalaemia, hypertension, and intestinal perforation in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016, 10:OD09-11. 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17198.7127
  10. Matheny LN, Wilson JR, Baum HB: Ectopic ACTH production leading to diagnosis of underlying medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2016, 4:2324709616643989. 10.1177/2324709616643989
  11. Balestrieri A, Magnani E, Nuzzo F: Unusual Cushing’s syndrome and hypercalcitoninaemia due to a small cell prostate carcinoma. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2016, 2016:6308058. 10.1155/2016/6308058
  12. Dacruz T, Kalhan A, Rashid M, Obuobie K: An ectopic ACTH secreting metastatic parotid tumour. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2016, 2016:4852907. 10.1155/2016/4852907
  13. Flynn E, Baqar S, Liu D, et al.: Bowel perforation complicating an ACTH-secreting phaeochromocytoma. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2016, 2016:10.1530/EDM-16-0061
  14. Sater ZA, Jha S, McGlotten R, Hartley I, El Lakis M, Araque KA, Nieman LK: Diverticular perforation: A fatal complication to forestall in Cushing syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018, 103:2811-4. 10.1210/jc.2018-00829
  15. Shahidi M, Phillips RA, Chik CL: Intestinal perforation in ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Biomed Res Int. 2019, 2019:9721781. 10.1155/2019/9721781
  16. Wijewickrama PS, Ratnasamy V, Somasundaram NP, Sumanatilleke M, Ambawatte SB: A challenging case of Cushing’s disease complicated with multiple thrombotic phenomena following trans-sphenoidal surgery; a case report. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021, 21:29. 10.1186/s12902-021-00701-0
  17. Ishinoda Y, Uto A, Meshino H, et al.: Bowel perforation associated with Cushing’s disease: a case report with literature review. Endocr J. 2023, 70:933-9. 10.1507/endocrj.EJ23-0110
  18. Lau JY, Sung J, Hill C, Henderson C, Howden CW, Metz DC: Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion. 2011, 84:102-13. 10.1159/000323958
  19. Chung KT, Shelat VG: Perforated peptic ulcer – an update. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017, 9:1-12. 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.1
  20. Weledji EP: An overview of gastroduodenal perforation. Front Surg. 2020, 7:573901. 10.3389/fsurg.2020.573901
  21. Akeel M, Elmakki E, Shehata A, Elhafey A, Aboshouk T, Ageely H, Mahfouz MS: Prevalence and factors associated with H. pylori infection in Saudi patients with dyspepsia. Electron Physician. 2018, 10:7279-86. 10.19082/7279
  22. Thirupathaiah K, Jayapal L, Amaranathan A, Vijayakumar C, Goneppanavar M, Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah VP: The association between Helicobacter pylori and perforated gastroduodenal ulcer. Cureus. 2020, 12:e7406. 10.7759/cureus.7406
  23. Farquharson-Roberts MA, Giddings AE, Nunn AJ: Perforation of small bowel due to slow release potassium chloride (slow-K). Br Med J. 1975, 3:206. 10.1136/bmj.3.5977.206
  24. Payan H, Blaustein A: Potassium chloride and small bowel perforation. Gastroenterology. 1965, 48:877-8. 10.1016/S0016-5085(65)80073-7
  25. Kubicka E, Zawadzka K, Syrycka J, Kałużny M, Pawluś A, Bolanowski M: A case of gastrinoma associated with ectopic Cushing syndrome. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020, 130:328-9. 10.20452/pamw.15201
  26. Hoshino C, Satoh N, Narita M, Kikuchi A, Inoue M: Another ‘Cushing ulcer’. BMJ Case Rep. 2011, 2011:10.1136/bcr.02.2011.3888

From https://www.cureus.com/articles/196132-adrenocorticotropic-hormone-dependent-cushings-syndrome-complicated-with-gastric-ulcer-perforation-in-a-30-year-old-saudi-female-a-case-report-and-a-review-of-the-literature#!/

A Case Report of Cushing’s Disease Presenting With Psychosis and Muscle Weakness Postpartum

Abstract

Cushing’s syndrome is a condition leading to overproducing of cortisol by the adrenal glands. If the pituitary gland overproduces cortisol, it is called Cushing’s disease. Cushing’s syndrome and even Cushing’s disease during and after pregnancy are rare events. There is not enough literature and guidance for managing and treating these patients. The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy is often delayed because the symptoms overlap. We presented a thin 31-year-old woman, admitted 2 months after a normal-term delivery, with an atypical presentation of Cushing’s disease, unusual clinical features, and a challenging clinical course. She had no clinical discriminatory features of Cushing’s syndrome. Given that the patient only presented with psychosis and proximal myopathy and had an uncomplicated pregnancy, our case was considered unusual. The patients also had hyperpigmentation and severe muscle weakness which are among the less common presentations of Cushing’s syndrome. Our findings suggest that an early diagnosis of Cushing’s disease is important in pregnancy period for its prevalent fetal and maternal complications, and it should be treated early to optimize fetal and maternal outcomes as there is an increasing trend toward live births in treated participants.

Introduction

Cushing’s syndrome is a condition that originates from excessive production of glucocorticoids. The condition is most common in women of childbearing age and is characterized by altered distribution of the adipose tissue to the central and upper regions of the trunk (central obesity and buffalo hump), face (moon face), capillary wall integrity (easy bruising), hyperglycemia, hypertension, mental status changes and psychiatric symptoms, muscle weakness, signs associated with hyperandrogenism (acne and hirsutism), and violaceous striae among other signs. Hypercortisolism and hyperandrogenism suppress the production of the pituitary gonadotropins, which in turn leads to menstrual irregularities and infertility.13 Moreover, the main common cause of developing Cushing’s syndrome is the use of exogenic steroid.3
Cushing’s disease is a form of Cushing’s syndrome with overproduction of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) due to pituitary adenoma. The diagnosis is made using clinical features and paraclinical tests including urinary free cortisol (UFC), serum ACTH, dexamethasone suppression tests (DSTs), pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and sometimes by inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS).4 Although women with Cushing’s disease are less likely to become pregnant, timely diagnosis and appropriate management are especially important during possible pregnancy, preventing neonatal and maternal complications and death. The diagnosis is challenging due to the overlap of the disease symptoms with the changes associated with a normal pregnancy. Moreover, the hormonal milieu during pregnancy has recently been proposed as a potential trigger for Cushing’s disease in some cases; hence, the term “pregnancy-associated Cushing’s disease” has been used for the disease in the recent literature. In this study, we presented a thin 31-year-old woman who was referred to our clinic 2 months after a normal delivery, with an atypical presentation of Cushing’s disease, unusual clinical features, and a challenging clinical course.

Case Presentation

Our patient was a 31-year-old woman who presented 2 months after the delivery of her second child. She had a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension in the past 2 years prior to her presentation. She had been admitted to another center following an episode of falling and muscle weakness. Two weeks later, she was admitted to our center with an impression of pulmonary thromboembolism due to tachypnea, tachycardia, and dyspnea. During follow-up, she was found to have leukocytosis, hyperglycemia (random blood sugar: 415 mg/d; normal level: up to 180 mg/dL) and hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis (PH: 7.5, HCO3 [bicarbonate]: 44.7 mEq/L, paO2 [partial pressure of oxygen]: 73 mm Hg, pCO2: 51.7 mm Hg, potassium: 2.7 mEq/L [normal range: 3.5-5.1 mEq/L]), which was refractory to the treatment; therefore, an endocrinology consultation was first requested. On physical examination, the patient was agitated, confused, and psychotic. Her vital signs were: blood pressure 155/100 mm Hg, heart rate: 130 bpm, and respiratory rate: 22 bpm, temperature: 39°C. As it has shown in Figure 1A, her face is not typical for moon face of Cushing’s syndrome, but facial hirsutism (Figure 1A) and generalized hyperpigmentation is obvious (Figure 1A-C). She was a thin lady and had a normal weight and distribution of adiposity (Body Mass Index [BMI] = 16.4 kg/m2; weight: 40 kg, and height: 156 cm). Aside from thinness of skin, she did not have the cutaneous features of Cushing’s syndrome (e.g. purpura, acne, and violaceous striae) and did not have supraclavicular and dorsocervical fat pad (buffalo hump), or plethora. In other words, she had no clinical discriminatory features of Cushing’s syndrome despite the high levels of cortisol, as confirmed by severely elevated UFC (5000 μg/24 h and 8000 μg/24 h; normal level: 4-40 μg/24 h). In addition, as will be mentioned later, the patient had axonal neuropathy which is a very rare finding in Cushing’s syndrome.
Figure 1. Clinical finding of our case with Cushing’s disease. (A) Hirsutism, (B) muscle atrophy seen in proximal portion of lower limbs, and (C) hyperpigmentation specially on the skin of the abdominal region.

OPEN IN VIEWER

She had a markedly diminished proximal muscle force of 1 out of 5 across all extremities; the rest of the physical examinations revealed no significant abnormalities (Figure 1B). On the contrary, based on her muscle weakness, hirsutism, psychosis and hyperpigmentation and refractory hypokalemic alkalosis, hyperglycemia, and hypertension, Cushing’s syndrome was suspected; therefore, 24-hour UFC level was checked that the results showed a severely elevated urinary cortisol (5000 μg/24 h and 8000 μg/24 h; normal level: 4-40 μg/24 h). Serum ACTH level was also inappropriately elevated (45 pg/mL; normal range: 10-60 pg/mL). High-dose dexamethasone failed to suppress plasma cortisol level and 24-hour urine cortisol level. A subsequent pituitary MRI showed an 8-mm pituitary mass, making a diagnosis of Cushing’s disease more probable. Meanwhile, the patient was suffering from severe muscle weakness that did not improve after the correction of hypokalemia. Then, a neurology consultation was requested. The neurology team evaluated laboratory data as well as EMG (Electromyography) and NCV (Nerve Conduction Velocity) of the patient, and based on their findings, “axonal neuropathy” was diagnosed for her weakness; so they ruled out the other neuromuscular diseases. A 5-day course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was started for her neuropathy; however, the treatment did not improve her symptoms and the patient developed fungal sepsis and septic shock. Therefore, she was processed with broad-spectrum antibiotics and antifungal agents and recovered from the infection.
Mitotane was started for the patient before definitive surgical treatment to suppress hormonal production due to her poor general condition. Despite the 8-mm size of the pituitary mass which is likely to be a source of ACTH, our patient was underweight and showed the atypical clinical presentation of Cushing’s disease, making us suspect an ectopic source for the ACTH. Therefore, a Gallium dotatate scan was performed to find any probable ectopic sources; however, the results were unremarkable. The patient underwent Trans-Sphenoidal Surgery (TSS) to resect the pituitary adenoma because it was not possible to perform IPSS in our center. Finally, the patient’s condition including electrolyte imbalance, muscle weakness, blood pressure, and hyperglycemia started to improve significantly. The pathologist confirmed the diagnosis of a corticotropic adenoma. Nevertheless, the patient suddenly died while having her meal a week after her surgery; most likely due to a thromboembolic event causing a cardiac accident.

Discussion

Our patient was significantly different from other patients with Cushing’s disease because of her atypical phenotype. She was unexpectedly thin and had psychosis, hyperpigmentation, proximal myopathy, axonal neuropathy and no clinical discriminatory features of Cushing’s syndrome such as central adiposity, dorsocervical or supraclavicular fat pad, plethora or striae. She had also a history of type 2 diabetes and hypertension 2 years before her admission. The patient was diagnosed with Cushing’s later. From what was presented, the patient did not know she had Cushing’s until after her delivery and despite the highly elevated UFC, and she completed a normal-term delivery. Given that she only presented with psychosis and proximal myopathy, her pregnancy was considered unusual. Her clinical features such as hyperpigmentation and severe muscle weakness are among less common presentations.5
11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11-βHSD1) is an enzyme responsible for converting cortisone (inactive glucocorticoid) into cortisol (active). It is speculated that this enzyme has a role in obesity (Figure 2).6,7
Figure 2. The enzymatic actions of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase on its substrate interconverting inactive and active glucocorticoid.

OPEN IN VIEWER

In a case reported by Tomlinson, a 20-year-old female was diagnosed with Cushing’s disease despite not having the classical features of the disease. It has been suggested that the mechanism is a partial defect in 11β-HSD1 activity and concomitant increase in cortisol clearance rate. Thus, the patient did not have a classic phenotype; the defect in the conversion of cortisone to cortisol rises cortisol clearance and protects the patient from the effects of cortisol excess. This observation may help explain individual susceptibility to the side effects of glucocorticoids.6
Further studies of Tomlinson et al showed that a deficit in the function of (and not a mutation related to) 11β-HSD2 might have been responsible for the absence of typical Cushing’s symptoms. 11-HSD2 keeps safe the mineralocorticoid receptor from excess cortisol. Mutation in the HSD11B2 gene explains an inherited form of hypertension, apparent mineralocorticoid excess syndrome, in which Cushing’s disease results in cortisol-mediated mineralocorticoid excess affecting the kidney and leads to both hypokalemia and hypertension.8
It is frequent in Cushing’s syndrome that the patients usually have no mineralocorticoid hypertension; however, it is still proposed that a defect in 11β-HSD1 can be responsible for the presence of mineralocorticoid hypertension in a subgroup of patients. In fact, 11β-HSD1 is expressed in several tissues like the liver, kidneys, placenta, fatty tissues and gonads,9 meaning that this enzyme may potentially affect the results of cortisol excess in Cushing’s syndrome/disease. Abnormality in the function of this enzyme could explain the absence of the symptoms like central obesity, easy bruising, and typical striae during Cushing’s disease. Several factors affect the action of glucocorticoids. In this regard, the impact of the different types and levels of impairment in glucocorticoid receptors have been highlighted in some studies, as it can lead to different levels of response to glucocorticoids10 as well as a variety in the symptoms observed in Cushing’s disease.
The predominant reaction of the NADP(H)-dependent enzyme 11-Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD)1 happens through the catalysis of the conversion of inactive cortisol into receptor-active cortisol. The reverse reaction is mediated through the unidirectional NAD-dependent 11-HSD type 2 (Figure 2).11
In another case reported by Ved V. Gossein, a 41-year-old female was evaluated for hirsutism and irregular menstrual cycles. Her BMI was 22.6 kg/m2. The patient had no signs or symptoms of overnight recurrent Cushing’s syndrome, the 48-hour DST failed to suppress cortisol levels, and 24-hour urinary cortisol levels were persistently elevated on multiple occasions. Adrenocorticotropic hormone levels were unreasonably normal, suggesting ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism. Despite these disorders, she had 2 children. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary did not show any abnormalities. Moreover, abdominal MRI did not show adrenal mass or enlargement. Genetic testing to determine glucocorticoid resistance syndrome showed no mutation.12
Primary generalized glucocorticoid resistance is a rare genetic disorder characterized by generalized or partial insensitivity of target tissues to glucocorticoids.1317 There is a compensatory increase in hypothalamic-pituitary activity due to decreased sensitivity of peripheral tissues to glucocorticoids systems.1317 Excessive ACTH secretion leads to high secretion of cortisol and mineralocorticoids and/or androgens. However, the clinical features of Cushing’s syndrome do not develop after resistance to the effects of cortisol. Generalized glucocorticoid resistance is a rare condition characterized by high cortisol levels but no scarring of Cushing’s syndrome.18
An important aspect of our case was her pregnancy. Our patient had a history of hypertension and diabetes type 2, 2 years before her presentation to our center that could be because of an undiagnosed Cushing’s disease. The patient’s pregnancy terminated 2 months prior the admission and she had a normal vaginal delivery. So, we suspect that she become pregnant while involved with the disease. Aside from focusing on how this can happen in a patient with such high levels of glucocorticoids, more attention should be paid to occurring pregnancy in the background of Cushing’s disease. In fact, up to 250 patients were reported, of which less than 100 were actively treated.1922
Cushing’s disease is associated with serious complications in up to 70% of the cases coinciding with pregnancy.21 The most frequent maternal complications reported in the literature are hypertension and impaired glucose tolerance, followed by preeclampsia, osteoporosis, severe psychiatric complications, and maternal death (in about 2% of the cases). Prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation account for the most prevalent fetal complications. Stillbirth, intrauterine deaths, intrauterine hemorrhage, and hypoadrenalism have also been reported.23 Early diagnosis is especially challenging during pregnancy because of many clinical and biochemical shared features of the 2 conditions.23,24 These features include an increase in ACTH production, corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) 1 level, level of cortisol (urinary, plasma and free), hyperglycemia, weight gain, and an increased chance for occurrence of bruising, hypertension (mistaken with preeclampsia), gestational diabetes mellitus, weight gain, and mood swings.3 There are some suggestions proposed in the studies that help in screening and differentiation of Cushing’s from the normal and abnormal effects of pregnancy and Cushing’s disease from Cushing’s syndrome in suspected pregnant patients. Contrary to Cushing’s syndrome, the nocturnal minimum level of cortisol is preserved in pregnancy.23,25 There is not yet a diagnostic cut-off determined on mentioned level; however, a few studies elucidate the evaluation of hypercortisolemia in a pregnant patient.2628
Urinary free cortisol, a measure that reflects the amount of free cortisol in circulation, normally increases during pregnancy, and it can increase up to 8 times the normal level with Cushing’s disease during the second and the third trimesters,23,29 which is a useful tool to evaluate cortisol levels in a suspected pregnant woman. Because the suppression of both UFC and plasma cortisol is decreased in pregnancy,23,30 a low-dose DST is not very helpful for screening Cushing’s disease in pregnant patients. However, a high-dose DST with a <80% cortisol suppression might only indicate Cushing’s disease.3,31 Thus, it helps differentiating between ectopic ACTH syndrome and Cushing’s disease.32 The use of high-dose DST can distinguish between adrenal and pituitary sources of CS in pregnancy. Owing to the limited evidence available and the lack of data on normal pregnancies, the use of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), desmopressin, and high-dose DST in pregnancy is not recommended yet.33 More timely diagnosis as well as timely intervention may have saved the life of our patient.
To differentiate between ectopic ACTH syndrome and Cushing’s disease, adrenal imaging should be considered. For higher plasma levels, combined employment of CRH stimulation test and an 8-mg DST can be helpful.3 Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (B-IPSS) might be needed when the findings are not in accordance with other results, but it is recommended to perform B-IPSS only if the noninvasive studies are inconclusive and only if there is enough expertise, experience, and technique for its performance.3
Although axonal neuropathy has been reported as a rare syndrome associated with paraneoplastic ectopic Cushing’s syndrome and exogenous Cushing’s syndrome, its association with Cushing’s disease has not been reported.5,32 Our patient had severe muscle weakness that we initially attributed it to myopathy and hypokalemia associated with Cushing’s syndrome. In our study, the diagnosis of axonal neuropathy was made based on electrophysiological studies by a neurology consultant and then IVIG was administered; however, the patient’s weakness did not improve after this treatment. The co-occurrence of Guillain-Barré syndrome which may also be classified as axonal neuropathy has also been reported in a pregnant woman with ectopic Cushing’s syndrome.34,35 Whether this finding is coincidental or the result of complex immune reactions driven by Cushing’s disease, or the direct effect of steroids, these results cannot be deduced from current data.36 Some data suggest that the fluctuations and inferior petrosal sinus sampling may trigger the flare of autoimmune processes, specifically when the cortisol levels start to decline during the course of Cushing’s syndrome.35,8 Also, due to COVID-19 pandemic affecting vital organs like kidney, paying attention to COVID-19 is suggested.3740

Conclusions

We presented a thin young female with psychosis, proximal myopathy, and axonal neuropathy with Cushing’s disease who had a recent pregnancy that was terminated without any fetal or maternal complications despite the repeated elevated serum cortisol and 24-hour UFC; therefore, we suggest that she might have glucocorticoid resistance. Glucocorticoid resistance is a rare disease in which the majority, but not all, of patients have a genetic mutation in the hGR-NR3C1 gene. As we did not perform genetic testing for our patient, the data are lacking.
Another clue to the absence of the classic Cushing’s disease phenotype in our case is the role of isoenzymes of 11-HSD1 and 11-HSD2. Other mechanisms, such as the defect somewhere in the glucocorticoid pathway of action such as a decreased number of receptors, a reduction in ligand affinity, or a postreceptor defect, play an important role in nonclassical clinical manifestations of Cushing’s syndrome.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patient for allowing us to publish this case report. The authors show their gratitude to the of the staff of the Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC) specially Mrs. Farahnaz Nikkhah for its technical and editorial assists.

Ethics Approval

Our institution does not require ethical approval for reporting individual cases or case series.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient and for her anonymized information to be published in this article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

1. Guilhaume B, Sanson ML, Billaud L, Bertagna X, Laudat MH, Luton JP. Cushing’s syndrome and pregnancy: aetiologies and prognosis in twenty-two patients. Eur J Med. 1992; 1(2):83-89.
2. Lin W, Huang HB, Wen JP, et al. Approach to Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy: two cases of Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy and a review of the literature. Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7(18):490.
3. Vilar L, Freitas MdC, Lima LHC, Lyra R, Kater CE. Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy: an overview. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2007;51(8):1293-1302.
4. Pecori Giraldi F, Cavallo LM, P, et al. The role of inferior petrosal sinus sampling in ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome: review and joint opinion statement by members of the Italian Society for Endocrinology, Italian Society for Neurosurgery, and Italian Society for Neuroradiology. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(2):E5.
5. Molina Garrido MJ, Guillén Ponce C, Maciá Escalante S, Pons Sanz V, Carrato Mena A. Cushing’s paraneoplastic syndrome as first manifestation of an adenocarcinoma of unknown origin. Clin Transl Oncol. 2006;8(8):621-623.
6. Tomlinson JW, Draper N, Mackie J, et al. Absence of Cushingoid phenotype in a patient with Cushing’s disease due to defective cortisone to cortisol conversion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(1):57-62.
7. Kobayashi T, Matsumoto T, Kamata K. IGF-I-induced enhancement of contractile response in organ-cultured aortae from diabetic rats is mediated by sustained thromboxane A2 release from endothelial cells. J Endocrinol. 2005;186(2): 367-376.
8. Stewart PM. Tissue-specific Cushing’s syndrome, 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases and the redefinition of corticosteroid hormone action. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;149:163-168.
9. Ricketts ML, Verhaeg JM, Bujalska I, et al. Immunohistochemical localization of type 1 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in human tissues. J Clinl Endocrinol Metabol. 1998;83:1325-1335.
10. Huizenga NA, Koper JW, De Lange P, et al. A polymorphism in the glucocorticoid receptor gene may be associated with and increased sensitivity to glucocorticoids in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(1):144-151.
11. Hintzpeter J, Stapelfeld C, Loerz C, Martin HJ, Maser E. Green tea and one of its constituents, Epigallocatechine-3-gallate, are potent inhibitors of human 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e84468.
12. Gossain VV, El-Rifai M, Krishnan P, Bhavsar B. Cushing’s syndrome with no clinical stigmata—a variant of glucocorticoid resistance syndrome. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;4:23-25.
13. Charmandari E, Kino T, Ichijo T, Chrousos GP. Generalized glucocorticoid resistance: clinical aspects, molecular mechanisms, and implications of a rare genetic disorder. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1563-1572.
14. Cidlowski JA, Malchoff CD, Malchoff DM. Glucocorticoid receptors, their mechanism of action, and glucocorticoid resistance. In: Jameson JL, De Groot LJ, eds. Endocrinology: Adult and Pediatric. Saunders; 2016:1717-1726.
15. Charmandari E, Kino T. Chrousos syndrome: a seminal report, a phylogenetic enigma and the clinical implications of glucocorticoid signaling changes. Eur J Clin Investig. 2010;40: 932-942.
16. Nicolaides NC, Charmandari E. Chrousos syndrome: from molecular pathogenesis to therapeutic management. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45(5):504-514.
17. Nicolaides N, Lamprokostopoulou A, Sertedaki A, Charmandari E. Recent advances in the molecular mechanisms causing primary generalized glucocorticoid resistance. Hormones. 2016;15(1): 23-34.
18. Huizenga NATM De Lange P, Koper JW, et al. Five patients with biochemical and/or clinical generalized glucocorticoid resistance without alterations in the glucocorticoid receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2076-2081.
19. Luger A, Broersen LHA, Biermasz NR, et al. ESE clinical practice guideline on functioning and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas in pregnancy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;185: G1-G33.
20. Sridharan K, Sahoo J, Palui R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment outcomes of Cushing’s disease during pregnancy. Pituitary. 2021;24(5):670-680.
21. Caimari F, Valassi E, Garbayo P, et al. Cushing’s syndrome and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review of published cases. Endocrine. 2017;55(2):555-563.
22. Lindsay JR, Jonklaas J, Oldfield EH, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome during pregnancy: personal experience and review of the literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(5):3077-3083.
23. Lindsay JR, Nieman LK. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in pregnancy: challenges in disease detection and treatment. Endocr Rev. 2005;26(6):775-799.
24. Buescher MA, McClamrock HD, Adashi EY. Cushing syndrome in pregnancy. Obstetr Gynecol. 1992;79:130-137.
25. Carr BR, Parker CR Jr, Madden JD, et al. Maternal plasma adrenocorticotropin and cortisol relationships throughout human pregnancy. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1981;139:416-422.
26. Mellor A, Harvey RD, Pobereskin LH, Sneyd JR. Cushing’s disease treated by trans-sphenoidal selective adenomectomy in mid-pregnancy. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80(6):850-852.
27. Doshi S, Bhat A, Lim K. Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy. J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2003;23:568-569.
28. Wood PJ, Barth JH, Freedman DB, Perry L, Sheridan B. Evidence for the low dose dexamethasone suppression test to screen for Cushing’s syndrome—recommendations for a protocol for biochemistry laboratories. Ann Clin Biochem. 1997;34(pt 3):222-229.
29. Lindsay JR, Jonklaas J, Oldfield EH, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome during pregnancy: personal experience and review of the literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(5): 3077-3083.
30. Wallace C, Toth EL, Lewanczuk RZ, Siminoski K. Pregnancy-induced Cushing’s syndrome in multiple pregnancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(1):15-21.
31. Invitti C, Pecori Giraldi F, de Martin M, Cavagnini F. Diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome: results of an Italian multicentre study. Study Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology on the Pathophysiology of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(2):440-448.
32. Vilar L, Naves LA, Freitas MdC, et al. Endogenous Cushing’s syndrome: clinical and laboratorial features in 73 cases. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2007;51(4):566-574.
33. Hamblin R, Coulden A, Fountas A, Karavitaki N. The diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy. J Neuroendocrinol. 2022;34(8):e13118.
34. Bressler R, Johnson CT. Cushing’s syndrome and the Guillain-Barré syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1959;50:1298-1303.
35. Moeindarbary S, Abbasi dalooei M, Ghahremani S, et al. Guillain-Barré syndrome following Cushing’s syndrome in a pregnant woman: a case report. Int J Pediatr. 2019;7:10651-10657.
36. Hasenmajer V, Sbardella E, Sciarra F, Minnetti M, Isidori AM, Venneri MA. The immune system in Cushing’s syndrome. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020;31(9):655-669.
37. Besharat S, Alamda NM, Dadashzadeh N, et al. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with COVID-19 who died in Modarres Hospital. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020;8:144-149.
38. Lotfi B, Farshid S, Dadashzadeh N, Valizadeh R, Rahimi MM. Is Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated with renal involvement? A review of century infection. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2020;13:e102899.
39. Dadashzadeh N, Farshid S, Valizadeh R, Nanbakhsh M, Rahimi MM. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVId-19 disease. Immunopathol Persa. 2020;6:e16.
40. Petramala L, Olmati F, Conforti MG, et al. Autoimmune diseases in patients with Cushing’s syndrome after resolution of hypercortisolism: case reports and literature review. Int J Endocrinol. 2018;2018:1464967.

 

Ectopic Cushing’s Syndrome From a Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone-Secreting Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: a Rare Pitfall af Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling

Abstract

Summary

This case report describes a rare presentation of ectopic Cushing’s syndrome (CS) due to ectopic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) production from a medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).

The patient, a 69-year-old man, presented with symptoms of muscle weakness, facial plethora, and easy bruising.

An inferior petrosal sinus sampling test (IPSS) demonstrated pituitary adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) secretion, but a whole-body somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT) revealed enhanced uptake in the right thyroid lobe which, in addition to a grossly elevated serum calcitonin level, was indicative of an MTC. A 18F-DOPA PET/CT scan supported the diagnosis, and histology confirmed the presence of MTC with perinodal growth and regional lymph node metastasis.

On immunohistochemical analysis, the tumor cell stained positively for calcitonin and CRH but negatively for ACTH. Distinctly elevated plasma CRH levels were documented. The patient therefore underwent thyroidectomy and bilateral adrenalectomy.

This case shows that CS caused by ectopic CRH secretion may masquerade as CS due to a false positive IPSS test. It also highlights the importance of considering rare causes of CS when diagnostic test results are ambiguous.

Learning points

  • Medullary thyroid carcinoma may secrete CRH and cause ectopic CS.
  • Ectopic CRH secretion entails a rare pitfall of inferior petrosal sinus sampling yielding a false positive test.
  • Plasma CRH measurements can be useful in selected cases.

Background

The common denominator of Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is autonomous hypersecretion of cortisol (1) and it is subdivided into ACTH-dependent and ACTH-independent causes. The majority of CS cases are ACTH-dependent (80–85%) with a pituitary corticotroph tumor as the most prevalent cause (Cushing’s disease), and less frequently an ectopic ACTH-producing tumor (2). The gold standard method to ascertain the source of ACTH secretion in CS patients is inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) with measurement of plasma ACTH levels in response to systemic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation (3). The IPSS has a very high sensitivity and specificity of 88–100% and 67–100%, respectively (4), but pitfalls do exist, including the rare ectopic CRH-producing tumor, which may yield a false positive test result (3). Here, we describe a very rare case masquerading as CS including a positive IPSS test.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old man presented at a local hospital with a 6-month history of progressive fatigue, muscle weakness and wasting, easy bruising, facial plethora, and fluid retention. His serum potassium level was 2.6 mmol/L (reference range: 3.5–4.2 mmol/L) without a history of diuretics use. His previous medical history included spinal stenosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and hypertension. An electromyography showed no sign of polyneuropathy and an echocardiography showed no signs of heart failure with an ejection fraction of 55%. MRI of the spine revealed multiple compression fractures, and the patient underwent spinal fusion and decompression surgery; during this admission he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c: 55 mmol/mol). After spine surgery, the patient developed a pulmonary embolism and initiated treatment with rivaroxaban.

Establishing the diagnosis of ACTH-dependent CS

Six months after his spine surgery, the patient was referred to the regional department of endocrinology for osteoporosis management. Blood tests revealed a low serum testosterone level with non-elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (Table 1). An overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test was positive with a morning cortisol level of 254 nmol/L and three consecutive 24-h urinary cortisol levels were markedly elevated with mean level of ≈600 nmol/24 h (reference range: 12–150 nmol/24 h). A single plasma ACTH was 37 ng/L (Table 1).

Table 1Baseline endocrine assessment.

Parameters Patient’s values Reference range
ACTH, ng/L 37 7–64
UFC, nmol/day 588 12–150
Urinary cortisol, nmol/L 600 171–536
OD, nmol/L 254 <50
Free testosterone, nmol/L 0.061 0.17–0.59
HbA1c, mmol/mol 55 <48
FSH, IU/L 7.4 1.2–15.8
LH, IU/L 2.2 1.7–8.6

ACTH, adrenocorticotropin; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; IU, international units; LH, luteinizing hormone; OD, plasma cortisol levels after a 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test; UFC, urine free cortisol hormone.

Differential diagnostic tests

The patient was referred to a tertiary center for further examinations. Ketoconazole treatment was started to alleviate the consequences of hypercortisolism. A pituitary MRI revealed an intrasellar microtumor with a maximal diameter of 6 mm and an IPSS was ordered. A whole-body somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT) was also performed to evaluate the presence of a potential neuroendocrine tumor. This revealed multiple areas of enhanced uptake including the right thyroid lobe and cervical lymph nodes in the neck (with CT correlates), as well as in the duodenum (with no CT correlate). Concomitantly, a grossly elevated serum calcitonin level of 528 pmol/L (reference range <2.79 pmol/L) was measured.

Subsequently, the IPSS revealed pituitary ACTH secretion with a central-to-peripheral ACTH ratio >3 (Table 2). The right petrosal sinus was not successfully catheterized; thus, lateralization could not be determined.

To corroborate the diagnosis MTC, a 18F-DOPA PET/CT scan (FDOPA) was performed (5), which showed pathologically enhanced uptake in the right thyroid lobe and regional lymph nodes (Fig. 1). An ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy from the thyroid nodule was inconclusive; however, the patient underwent total thyroidectomy and regional lymph node resection, from which histology confirmed the diagnosis of disseminated MTC. Standard replacement with levothyroxine, calcium, and vitamin D was initiated. A blood sample was collected, and genomic DNA was extracted. The DNA analysis for RET germline mutation was negative.

Figure 1View Full Size
Figure 1
18F-DOPA PET/CT scan with pathologically enhanced uptake in the right thyroid lobe (large blue arrow on the left side) and regional lymph nodes (small blue arrows).

Citation: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports 2023, 3; 10.1530/EDM-23-0057

Table 2Results from the inferior petrosal sinus sampling.*

Time (min) Left IPSS Peripheral L/P
-5 42 36 1.2
-1 116 33 3.5
2 120 32 3.8
5 209 28 7.5
7 180 43 4.2
10 529 34 15.6
15 431 37 11.6

*Data represents ACTH levels in ng/L. IPSS Inferior petrosal sampling ACTH Adrenocorticotropin hormone CRH Corticotropin-releasing hormone, L/P Ratio of left (L) inferior petrosal sinus to peripheral venous ACTH concentrations.

Pathology

Total thyroidectomy and bilateral cervical lymph node dissection (level six and seven) were performed. Macroscopic evaluation of the right thyroid lobe revealed a 24 mm, irregular solid yellow tumor. Microscopically the tumor showed an infiltrating architecture with pseudofollicles and confluent solid areas. Calcification was prominent, but no amyloid deposition was seen. The tumor cells were pleomorphic with irregular nuclei and heterogenic chromatin structure. No mitotic activity or necrosis was observed. On immunohistochemical analysis, the tumor cells expressed thyroid transcription factor 1 and stained strongly for carcinoembryonic antigen and calcitonin; tumor cells were focally positive for cytokeratin 19. The tumor was completely negative for ACTH, thyroid peroxidase, and the Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 antigen. Further analysis revealed positive immunostaining for CRH (Fig. 2). The Ki-67 index was very low (0–1%), indicating a low cellular proliferation. Molecular testing for somatic RET mutation was not performed.

Figure 2View Full Size
Figure 2
Histopathological findings and immunohistochemical studies of MTC. (A) Microscopic features of medullary thyroid carcinoma. (B) Polygonal tumor cells (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40). (C) Tumor cells stain for calcitonin (×20). (D) Immunohistochemical stain (×400) for CRH showing cells being positive (brown). (E) Pituitary tissue from healthy control staining positive for ACTH in comparison to (F) ACTH-negative cells MTC tissue from the patient (×20).

Citation: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports 2023, 3; 10.1530/EDM-23-0057

No malignancy was found in the left thyroid lobe and there was no evidence of C-cell hyperplasia. Regional lymph node metastasis was found in 13 out of 15 nodes with extranodal extension.

Outcome and follow-up

Follow-up

Serum calcitonin levels declined after neck surgery but remained grossly elevated (118 pmol/L 3 weeks post surgery) and cortisol levels remained high. Ketoconazole treatment was poorly tolerated and not sufficiently effective. Plasma levels of CRH were measured by a competitive-ELISA kit (EKX-KIZI6R-96 Nordic BioSite), according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The intra- and interassay %CV (coefficient of variability) were below 8% and 10%, respectively, and the assay sensitivity was 1.4 pg/mL. The plasma CRH was distinctly elevated compared to in-house healthy controls both before and after thyroid surgery (Fig. 3).

Figure 3View Full Size
Figure 3
Plasma CRH levels before and after total thyroidectomy compared to three healthy controls.

Citation: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports 2023, 3; 10.1530/EDM-23-0057

The patient subsequently underwent uneventful bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy followed by standard replacement therapy with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone. The symptoms and signs of his CS gradually subsided. Pathology revealed bilateral cortical hyperplasia as expected.

The patient continues follow-up at the Department of Oncology and the Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine. At 13-month follow-up, 68Ga-DOTATOC shows residual disease with pathologically enhanced uptake in two lymph nodes, whereas the previously described focal DOTATOC uptake in the duodenum was less pronounced (still no CT correlate). Serum calcitonin was 93 pmol/L at the 13-month follow-up.

Discussion

Diagnostic challenges remain in the distinction between pituitary and ectopic ACTH-dependent CS, and several diagnostic tools are used in combination, none of which is infallible, including IPSS (6). Our case and others illustrate that ectopic CRH secretion may yield a false positive IPSS test result (3). Measurement of circulating CRH levels is relevant if an ectopic CRH producing tumor is suspected, but the assay is not routinely available in clinical practice (Lynnette K Nieman M. Measurement of ACTH, CRH, and other hypothalamic and pituitary peptides https://www.uptodate.com/contents/measurement-of-acth-crh-and-other-hypothalamic-and-pituitary-peptides: UpToDate; 2019). In our case, the presence of elevated plasma CRH levels after thyroidectomy strengthened the indication for bilateral adrenalectomy.

The most common neoplasm causing ectopic CS is small-cell lung cancer, whereas MTC accounts for 2–8% of ectopic cases (7). The development of CS in relation to MTC is generally associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis of an otherwise relatively indolent cancer (8), and the clinical progression of CS is usually rapid, why an early recognition and rapid control of hypercortisolemia and MTC is necessary to decrease morbidity and mortality (79). Our case does have residual disease; however, he remains progression-free with stable and relatively low calcitonin levels within 1-year follow-up.

Only a very limited number of cases of ectopic tumors with either combined ACTH and CRH secretion or isolated CRH secretion have been reported, with ectopic CRH secretion accounting for less than 1% of CS (9).

An ACTH- or CRH-producing tumor can be difficult to localize and may include gastric ACTH/CRH-secreting neuroendocrine tumors (9). In our case, the 68Ga-DOTATOC identified a possible duodenal site, in addition to the MTC, but an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed no pathological findings and there was no CT correlate. Thus, we concluded that the most likely and sole source of ectopic CRH was the MTC and its metastases.

To our knowledge, no official guidelines for managing ectopic ACTH-dependent CS have been established. In a recent publication by Alba et al. (10), the authors demonstrated a clinical algorithm (The Mount Sinai Clinical Pathway, MSCP) and recommendation for the management of CS due to ectopic ACTH secretion.

Essentially, our approach in this particular case followed these recommendations, including source location by CT and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging, acute management with ketoconazole, and finally, bilateral adrenalectomy as curative MTC surgery was not possible. In retrospect, performance of the IPSS could be questioned in view of the MTC diagnosis. In real time, however, a pituitary MRI performed early in the diagnostic process revealed a microadenoma, which prompted the IPSS. In parallel, a somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT) was also done, which raised the suspicion of an MTC.

Conclusion

We report a very rare case of an ectopic CS caused by a CRH-secreting MTC. Although IPSS has stood the test of time in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent CS, this case illustrates a rare pitfall.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

Patient consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details was obtained from the patient.

Author contribution statement

JOJ and MJO are the physicians responsible for the patient. LR performed the thyroidectomy and bilateral adrenalectomy. SHM and SLA assessed and reassessed the histopathology and the immunohistochemical analysis. MB measured plasma CRH. VM, JOJ, and MJO drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to critical revision of the manuscript.

References

Hormones and High Blood Pressure: Study Reveals Endocrine Culprits and Targeted Treatments

In a recent study published in Hypertension Research, scientists examine the endocrine causes of hypertension (HTN) and investigate the efficacy of treatments to alleviate HTN.

 

What is HTN?

About 30% of the global population is affected by HTN. HTN is a modifiable cardiovascular (CV) risk factor that is associated with a significant number of deaths worldwide.

There are two types of HTN known as primary and secondary HTN. As compared to primary HTN, secondary HTN causes greater morbidity and mortality.

The most common endocrine causes of HTN include primary aldosteronism (PA), paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas (PGL), Cushing’s syndrome (CS), and acromegaly. Other causes include congenital adrenal hyperplasia, mineralocorticoid excess, cortisol resistance, Liddle syndrome, Gordon syndrome, and thyroid and parathyroid dysfunction.

What is PA?

PA is the most common endocrine cause of hypertension, which is associated with excessive aldosterone secretion by the adrenal gland and low renin secretion. It is difficult to estimate the true prevalence of PA due to the complexity of its diagnosis.

Typically, the plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is measured to diagnose PA. The diagnosis of PA can also be confirmed using other diagnostic tools like chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays (CLEIAs) and radio immune assay (RIA).

Continuous aldosterone secretion is associated with organ damage due to chronic activation of the mineralocorticoid (MR) receptor in many organs, including fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes. An elevated level of aldosterone causes diastolic dysfunction, endothelial dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, and arterial stiffness.

Increased aldosterone secretion also leads to obstructive sleep apnea and increases the risk of osteoporosis. This is why individuals with PA are at a higher risk of cardiovascular events (CVDs), including heart failure, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation.

PA is treated by focusing on normalizing potassium and optimizing HTN and aldosterone secretion. Unilateral adrenalectomy is a surgical procedure proposed to treat PA.

Young patients who are willing to stop medication are recommended surgical treatment. The most common pharmaceutical treatment for PA includes mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as spironolactone and eplerenone.

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas

PGL are tumors that develop at the thoracic-abdominal-pelvic sympathetic ganglia, which are present along the spine, as well as in the parasympathetic ganglia located at the base of the skull. The incidence rate of PGL is about 0.6 for every 100,000 individuals each year. PGL tumors synthesize excessive catecholamines (CTN), which induce HTN.

Some of the common symptoms linked to HTN associated with PGL are palpitations, sweating, and headache. PGL can be diagnosed by determining metanephrines (MN) levels, which are degraded products of CTN. Bio-imaging tools also play an important role in confirming the diagnosis of PGL.

Excessive secretion of CTN increases the risk of CVDs, including Takotsubo adrenergic heart disease, ventricular or supraventricular rhythm disorders, hypertrophic obstructive or ischaemic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and hemorrhagic stroke. Excessive CTN secretion also causes left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction.

Typically, PGL treatment is associated with surgical procedures. Two weeks before the surgery, patients are treated with alpha-blockers. For these patients, beta-blockers are not used as the first line of treatment without prior use of alpha-adrenergic receptors.

Patients with high CTN secretion are treated with metyrosine, as this can inhibit tyrosine hydroxylase. Hydroxylase converts tyrosine into dihydroxyphenylalanine, which is related to CTN synthesis.

What is CS?

CS, which arises due to persistent exposure to glucocorticoids, is a rare disease with an incidence rate of one in five million individuals each year. The most common symptoms of CS include weight gain, purple stretch marks, muscle weakness, acne, and hirsutism. A high cortisol level causes cardiovascular complications such as HTN, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes.

CS is diagnosed based on the presence of two or more biomarkers that can be identified through pathological tests, such as salivary nocturnal cortisol, 24-hour urinary-free cortisol, and dexamethasone suppression tests.

CS is treated through surgical procedures based on the detected lesions. Patients with severe CS are treated with steroidogenic inhibitors, such as metyrapone, ketoconazole, osilodrostat, and mitotane. Pituitary radiotherapy and bilateral adrenalectomy are performed when other treatments are not effective.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly arises due to chronic exposure to growth hormone (GH), leading to excessive insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) synthesis. This condition has a relatively higher incidence rate of 3.8 million person-years. Clinical symptoms of acromegaly include thickened lips, widened nose, a rectangular face, prominent cheekbones, soft tissue overgrowth, or skeletal deformities.

Prolonged exposure to GH leads to increased water and sodium retention, insulin resistance, reduced glucose uptake, and increased systemic vascular resistance. These conditions increase the risk of HTN and diabetes in patients with acromegaly. Acromegalic patients are also at a higher risk of cancer, particularly those affecting the thyroid and colon.

Acromegaly is diagnosed using the IGF1 assay, which determines IGF1 levels in serum. After confirming the presence of high IGF1 levels, a GH suppression test must be performed to confirm the diagnosis. Bioimaging is also conducted to locate adenoma.

Acromegaly is commonly treated through surgical procedures. Patients who refuse this line of treatment are treated with somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, dopaminergic agonists, or radiotherapy.

Journal reference:
  • De Freminville, J., Amar, L., & Azizi, M. (2023) Endocrine causes of hypertension: Literature review and practical approach. Hypertension Research; 1-14. doi:10.1038/s41440-023-01461-1

From https://www.news-medical.net/news/20231015/Hormones-and-high-blood-pressure-Study-reveals-endocrine-culprits-and-targeted-treatments.aspx